Up Next
Theo Von Processes Fear and Grief After Charlie Kirk's Assassination Shakes Public Safety
17:46
Candace Owens Explains Why She Says F Ukraine and Why America Must Put Itself First
10:05
Tucker Carlson Raises Troubling Questions About Charlie Kirk's Death and the War in Iran
16:26
Jocko Willink on Brian Thompson's Assassination and the Dangerous Devolution of American Culture
Jocko Willink draws a stark parallel between the strict rules of engagement he followed as a Navy SEAL in Ramadi and the brutal assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on American soil. In 2006, Willink couldn't declare even a known al-Qaeda leader hostile without high-level approval, yet in modern America, one man declared another hostile and executed him for his beliefs. Willink examines how digital manipulation, social media algorithms, and constant exposure to curated outrage have created a culture of radicalization, isolation, and dehumanization. He warns that we're carrying instruments of brainwashing in our pockets, feeding us divisive content designed to make us hate. This is a call to reject electronic emotions, reconnect with real human relationships, and remember what it means to be American.
The Rules of Engagement in Ramadi
In 2006, Jocko Willink was in charge of SEAL Task Unit Bruiser in Ramadi, Iraq. His mission was to help conventional forces secure and stabilize the city from insurgents who were torturing, raping, and murdering the local populace. The city was a complete war zone, and his task unit conducted hundreds of operations—reconnaissance missions, presence patrols, direct action raids, and sniper overwatches—to support US Army and Marine Corps troops who had the insanely difficult job of clearing the city house to house, street to street, and neighborhood to neighborhood.
The fighting was brutal. Many brave soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines were wounded and killed. The civilian populace suffered heinous crimes against humanity committed by demonic insurgents.
The Al-Qaeda Leader We Couldn't Engage
A couple of months into the deployment, Willink's team received intelligence about a specific al-Qaeda insurgent leader—one of the worst of the worst. He had a reputation for absolute brutality, a bloodthirsty boss in an evil death cult. The intelligence gave them a window of time and place to kill him, but the window was small and extremely high risk. This insurgent leader traveled frequently, never settling in one place for long, and he traveled with a significant security detail of would-be martyrs ready to kill and die for him.
Due to these parameters, Willink made an extremely uncommon request up the chain of command. In Iraq, they followed very strict rules of engagement that required an individual must display either a hostile act or show hostile intent before they could be engaged. In layman's terms, before one of Willink's SEALs could shoot, they were required to determine with reasonable certainty that the individual was either committing a hostile act or showing hostile intent. These rules of engagement were in place to protect the civilian populace and mitigate collateral damage.
In this particular case, the insurgent leader was not likely to be committing a hostile act or displaying hostile intent in the location where they predicted he would be. He was simply scheduled to pass through a specific location. So Willink asked his chain of command for this individual to be declared hostile—a legal term that can only be done by appropriate high-level US command authorities, senior flag officers with the responsibility to weigh all available intelligence, legal obligations, political considerations, and consequences for US interests.
The Request Denied
From Willink's perspective, this was the perfect time for the use of this type of declaration. At this time, al-Qaeda and the insurgents had the upper hand in both Ramadi and Anbar province. They were killing and wounding coalition forces on a daily basis and wantonly butchering the civilian populace day in and day out. This high-value targeted individual was a leader of this savagery. If they had the chance to kill him, it made perfect sense that they should do just that.
Willink sent the request up the chain of command, figuring they would get approval. The platoon prepared to conduct the operation—they put together a plan, rehearsed the actions, dialed in their weapons, prepared the vehicles, and waited. The timeline was tight as they stood by to execute the mission, growing impatient.
Finally, just before their drop-dead time to launch the operation, they received word from higher headquarters. The answer was no. They would not allow them to declare this al-Qaeda leader hostile. They would not be able to shoot him when they confirmed it was him. In keeping with the standard rules of engagement, they would only be able to engage him if he committed a hostile act or displayed hostile intent.
This threw a wrench into the plan. Due to the tight timeline and the restraints of the rules of engagement in this particular situation, they did not execute the mission. They canceled it.
Frustration and American Values
At the time, it was very frustrating. Willink was frustrated, but he knew they couldn't let emotions drive their decisions—that can have catastrophic results. Still, seeing so many brave Americans wounded and killed, it was hard not to get emotional when an opportunity to kill enemy leadership like that was missed.
But this reinforced an idea in Willink's mind about who Americans are. Even in a devastating war zone where American lives are at risk and a clear enemy is present, even when a targeted individual is without question a sadistic, deranged, remorseless, depraved monster, even then, Americans seldom declare people hostile. Americans value human life that much. They aspire to live up to their own ideals and the rule of law. They take and maintain the moral high ground even at great risk to themselves and their American brothers and sisters on the battlefields. They remember their American values and do their utmost to maintain those standards.
Standards Shattered at Home
Now, those standards and that ideal have been shattered here at home. Murder is rampant. Destruction is commonplace. And assassination—one man, Brian Thompson, declared hostile by another man and executed for his beliefs and for the words that he spoke. This is happening in America, on our hallowed homeland. And some people cheer and celebrate this execution. That's sickening.
Willink asks himself: What have we become? Where does this come from? How do people become so depraved?
The Pliable Human Mind
When thinking about that question, Willink believes it's important to remember how pliable and impressionable the human mind is, how people are influenced by what they see and what they hear. Just look at normal pop culture trends in music, fashion, or language—these things change all the time. They grow and fade and something else grows, and people follow each other and follow trends. It's part of human psychology. Humans like to be part of a group. It's an instinct. People want to feel secure.
When people don't have those things, that's how brainwashing happens—people in moments or situations of isolation, fear, and confusion. Those are fertile grounds for manipulation. Once it's recognized that someone is in a bad state, an isolated state, a confused state, then it's just exposure, repetition, reinforcement, group pressure, social influence, and indoctrination. Eventually people change what they think and what they believe. That's brainwashing.
The Digital Instrument of Brainwashing
In the old days—20, 30, 40 years ago—in order to brainwash someone, you had to physically control them. You had to physically remove them from their community and forcibly expose them to the information you wanted them to accept. This was challenging because it's difficult to get physical access and control of another human being at that level.
But it's very different now. Everyone is carrying around and glued to a conduit of brainwashing all day, every day in their hands—their phone. You only have to go on that phone for five minutes to realize the kind of destructive, manipulative, and divisive content that's on there.
When you subject a human being to that for four, six, eight, ten, or twelve hours a day with an algorithm specifically engineered and tailored to keep them watching, listening, scrolling, and feeling emotions based on 30-second clips curated to make them emotional, frustrated, angry, spiteful, to make them hate—all for clicks, likes, and shares. As stupid and meaningless as we think they are, when they happen over and over and over again to someone who is insecure, alone, or has a pliable young mind, the result is very predictable: isolation, polarization, dehumanization, and radicalization.
The Path to Radicalization
Radicalization means the rejection of societal norms, the adoption of the most extreme views, and the abandonment of reason. It keeps going until it reaches a point where one disturbed and twisted soul believes he has the right and authority to declare another man as hostile and execute that man.
This is a devolution. This is a regression. This is a decline of our culture. We cannot accept this behavior. This is tribal murder. And what caused it? An infection of the mind. We cannot accept that either.
There Must Be Rules
There have to be rules. There must be rules. Willink isn't talking about rules to be imposed by the government or by technocrats. He's talking about rules that we need to apply to ourselves as humans, as individuals, as families, as communities, as Americans.
Do not allow yourself to be manipulated by electronic emotions. Do not allow yourself to be possessed by digital demons. There is darkness in the world. There is evil in the world. And it has never been easier for that evil to crawl inside your head, to grab hold of your heart, and to get control of your soul. You must cast it out. You cannot accept that master.
Listen to your friends, not your feed. Talk to people, not to pixels. Connect with your family, not with firmware. Steer away from the darkness that surrounds us. As strong as the lure of temptation might be, do your utmost to walk in the light, in the principles that founded our great nation.
Our Country Is Us
Our great nation is ours. Our country is us. It is what we do. It is how we behave. It is what we allow and what we forbid—not the legislation, not the political class, not the elite, but us. You and me.
Our forefathers fought for freedom. Many in Willink's generation did the same. They have fought for freedom and will do it again. They are not afraid and will not tolerate those who aim to destroy us, destroy our way of life, harm our families, or infringe on our freedom. Freedom is our God-given right. It's ours to protect. It's ours to cherish. That is our choice.
It's on us to carry on, to stand up for what we believe in, to be better people—to be better people to each other and to be better people for each other.
We Are Americans
This is America. We are Americans—brave, strong, and free. We must not be hostile to each other. We must not be enemies here in our own land. That is unacceptable. Too much blood has already been shed. We need to make bridges instead of blood, for God's sake and for the sake of our country.
We are Americans and we must act like Americans. One nation under God, with liberty and justice for all.
Video Transcript
in Iraq. In 2006, I was in charge of a
SEAL task unit, and our job was to help
conventional forces secure and stabilize
the city of Rammani
from
evil insurgents who were torturing,
raping, and murdering the local
populace.
And it was a complete war zone at the
time. and my SEAL task unit, task unit
bruiser.
We conducted
hundreds of operations to support
coalition forces on the ground. And our
operations consisted of
reconnaissance missions, presence
patrols,
direct action raids,
and sniper overwatches
to help out and support the US Army and
the Marine Corps troops
who had the insanely difficult job of
clearing the city house to house, street
to street.
and neighborhood to neighborhood. And
the fighting was brutal.
And there were many
brave soldiers, sailors, airmen, and
marines who took the fight to the enemy.
And many of those
were wounded
and many were killed.
and the civilian populace in the city,
they suffered heinous
crimes against humanity committed by the
demonic insurgents.
And a couple of months into that
deployment, we received some
intelligence about a specific al-Qaeda
insurgent leader,
and he was one of the worst of the
worst. He had a reputation of absolute
brutality.
He was a bloodthirsty boss in this
evil death cult.
And the intelligence that we received
about him gave us a window
of time and place and an opportunity
to kill him.
But the window was small and it was
extremely high risk.
And the window was small because this
particular insurgent leader traveled
frequently and he never settled in one
place for any length of time. And the
risk was high because he traveled with
significant security
uh detail of
wouldbe martyrs who were ready to kill
and die for this homicidal maniac. And
due to those parameters,
I made an extremely uncommon request up
the chain of command. You see, in Iraq,
we followed very strict rules of
engagement.
And the rules of engagement
required
that an individual,
a potential enemy individual, must
display
either a hostile act or they must show
hostile intent before we could engage
them. And to put that into layman's
term, what that meant was before one of
my SEALs could shoot,
they were required to determine with
reasonable certainty
that the individual they were shooting
was either committing a hostile act or
was showing hostile intent.
And my SEALs had to confirm that before
they could shoot.
And the soldiers and marines had to
follow those same rules of engagement.
And these rules of engagement,
they are in place to protect the
civilian populace and to mitigate
collateral damage. But in this
particular case, this insurgent leader
was not likely to be committing a
hostile act or displaying hostile intent
in the location
where we predicted he was going to be.
He was simply scheduled to pass through
a specific location. We had intelligence
about that.
And so what I asked my chain of command
was for this individual to be
declared hostile.
And declared hostile,
this is a
a legal term.
You can declare an individual hostile.
And this can only be done by appropriate
highlevel US command authorities. And
what that means is
senior flag officers with the
responsibility to weigh all of the
available intelligence, all the legal
obligations,
the political considerations, and they
have to think about the consequences for
US interests. and then they have to
make this decision to declare an
individual hostile.
But from my perspective, this was the t
perfect
time for the use of this type of
declaration
because after all to restate, at this
time al-Qaeda and the insurgents
had the upper hand in both Ramani and in
Albar province.
They were killing and wounding wounding
coalition forces on a daily basis and
they were wantingly butchering the
civilian populace day in and day out.
And so this
highvalue targeted individual that we
wanted to kill was a leader of this
savagery.
So if we had the chance to kill him, it
made perfect sense to me that we should
do just that. So, I sent that request up
the chain of command that they deem this
individual hostile so that we could
shoot on site.
And quite frankly, I figured that we
would get the approval.
So,
the platoon prepared to conduct the
operation. They put together a plan.
They rehearsed
the actions. They dialed in their
weapons. They prepared the vehicles. And
then waited.
And it was a tight timeline
as we stood by to execute this mission.
So we were a little bit impatient. But
finally, just before our drop dead time
to launch the operation,
we finally received word from our higher
headquarters.
And the answer was no.
The answer was no.
They would not allow us to declare this
al-Qaeda leader hostile. We would not be
able to shoot him
when we confirmed it was him. When we
made positive identification, we would
not simply be able to engage. No. In
keeping with the standard rules of
engagement, we would only be able to
engage him
if he committed a hostile act or
displayed hostile intent.
Now, this threw a wrench into what our
plan was. And unfortunately, due to the
tight timeline
due to the restraints of the rules of
engagement in this particular situation,
we did not execute the mission.
We canceled the mission. And
of course, at the time it was very
frustrating. I was frustrated,
but I know that we can't let our
emotions drive our decisions. That can
have catastrophic results. But seeing so
many brave Americans wounded and killed,
it was hard not to get emotional
when an opportunity to kill enemy
leadership like that was missed.
So I was frustrated but at the same time
this was something that reinforced
an idea in my mind
about who we are.
We are Americans
and even in a devastating war zone
where American lives are at risk
and a clear enemy is present and even
when a targeted individual
is without question
a targeted individual who is a sadistic,
deranged,
remorseless, depraved monster. Even
then, we seldom declare people hostile.
We
as Americans, we are supposed to value
human life that much.
We aspire to live up to our own ideals.
the rule of law
and that's what we did.
We take and we maintain
the moral high ground even at great
risks to ourselves
and our American brothers and sisters on
the battlefields.
But we remember
our American values
and we do our utmost
to maintain
those values and those standards.
Now,
right now, we have seen
those standards
and that ideal shattered here
at home.
Murder is rampant.
Destruction is common place. And
assassination
assassination. One man,
Charlie Kirk, declared hostile by
another man and executed
for his beliefs
and for the words
that he spoke.
And we see this
in our country on our hallowed homeland.
And we see some people cheer and
celebrate
this
execution.
And that's sickening.
And
I ask myself, what have we become? Where
does this come from?
And I've been asking myself that
question.
How do people
become
so depraved?
And when I think about that, I think
it's important to remember how
pliable and impressionable the human
mind is,
how people are
influenced by what they see and what
they hear. And if you just look at just
normal pop culture trends in music or
fashion or language, the words that we
use,
these things they they change all the
time. They they grow and then they fade
and then something else grows and people
follow each other and they follow
trends.
It's part of our psychology.
We as humans,
we like to be part of a group. It's an
instinct for us. We want to feel secure.
And when we don't have those things,
that's how brainwashing happens.
people
in moments or situations of isolation
and fear and confusion.
Those are fertile grounds
for manipulation.
And once
it is recognized that someone is in a
bad state, an isolated state, a confused
state, then it's just exposure
and repetition and reinforcement and
group pressure and social influence and
indoctrination.
And eventually people change.
Eventually people change. They change
what they think and they change what
they believe.
And that's brainwashing.
And in the old days,
and by old days I mean 20 years ago, 30
years ago, 40 years ago, in order to
brainwash someone, you had to physically
control them. You had to physically
remove them from their community. You
had to forcibly expose them to the
information that you wanted them to
accept. And this is pretty challenging
to do because it's difficult
to get physical access and physical
control of another human being at that
level.
But it's very different now.
And everyone is carrying around and
glued to a conduit of brainwashing.
And we're carrying around
that conduit all day, every day in our
hands.
And it's our phone.
And you only have to go on that phone
for five minutes to realize the kind of
destructive and manipulative and
divisive content that's on there. And
when you subject a human being to that
for four hours or six hours or eight
hours or 10 hours or 12 hours a day with
an algorithm that is specifically
engineered and tailored
to keep them watching and keep them
listening and keep them scrolling and
keep them feeling
keep them feeling emotions.
based on 30-second clips that are
curated to make them emotional, to make
them frustrated, to make them angry, to
make them spiteful,
to make them hate.
and clicks and likes and shares. As
stupid and meaningless as we think they
are
when they happen over and over and over
and over again. To someone that is
insecure,
to someone that is alone,
to someone that has a pliable young
mind. The result is very predictable.
Isolation,
polarization,
dehumanization
and radicalization.
Radicalization,
the
rejection of societal norms,
the adoption of the most extreme views,
and the abandonment of reason.
And it keeps going until it reaches a
point where one disturbed and twisted
soul believes that he has the right and
the authority to declare another man as
hostile
and execute that man.
This is
a devolution. This is a regression. This
is a decline
of our culture. And we cannot accept
this behavior. This is this is tribal
murder.
And what caused it?
It's an infection of the mind and we
cannot accept that either.
There have to be rules. There must be
rules. And I'm not talking about rules
to be imposed
by our government.
I'm not talking about rules to be
imposed by the technocrats. I'm talking
about rules that we need to apply to
ourselves
as humans, as individuals, as families,
as communities,
as Americans,
as individual Americans. Do not allow
yourself to be manipulated
by electronic emotions. Do not allow
yourself to be possessed
by digital demons.
There is darkness in the world. There is
evil in the world.
And it has never been easier for that
evil to crawl inside your head.
It has never been easier for that evil
to grab a hold of your heart.
And it has never been easier for that
darkness and that evil to get control of
your soul.
You must cast it out.
You cannot accept that master.
Listen to your friends, not your feed.
Talk to people, not to the pixels.
Connect with your family, not with
firmware.
and steer away
from the darkness that surrounds us. And
as strong
as the lure
of temptation might be.
Do
your utmost, your utmost to walk
in the light,
in the principles
that founded
our great nation.
Our great nation, ours, our country is
us.
It's us.
It is what we do. It is how we behave.
It is what we allow and it is what we
forbid.
Not the legislation, not the political
class, not the elite, but us. It's us.
You and me.
Our
forefathers fought for freedom.
Many in my generation did the same.
We have fought for freedom and we will
do it again. We are not afraid
and we will not tolerate
those who aim to destroy us or destroy
our way of life or harm our families or
infringe on our freedom.
Freedom is our Godgiven right.
It's ours to protect. It's ours to
cherish. That is our choice.
It's on us
to carry on
to stand up for what we believe in.
to be
better people.
To be better people to each other and to
be better people for each other.
This is America.
We are Americans.
brave.
We are strong.
We are free.
We must not be hostile to each other.
We must not be enemies here in our own
land. That is unacceptable.
Too much blood has already been shed.
We need to make
bridges instead of blood
for God's sake and for the sake of our
country.
We are Americans
and we must act like Americans.
One nation
under God,
with liberty and justice
for all.