2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk Celebrate Supreme Court Victory Against Transgender Medical Procedures on Children
Matt Walsh joins Charlie Kirk to discuss the Supreme Court's decision upholding Tennessee's law banning gender transition procedures on minors, marking what Walsh calls "the fatal blow" to the transgender medical industry. The ruling validates state bans across the country and clears the path for a potential federal ban. Walsh explains how the trans activist movement relied on courts to bail them out, and now that strategy has failed. With public opinion overwhelmingly against child medical transitions, Walsh and Kirk argue there's no excuse for Republicans in Congress not to pass a nationwide ban, forcing Democrats to defend the indefensible on the record.
Matt Walsh, host of the Matt Walsh Show and filmmaker behind "Am I a Racist?" and "What is a Woman?", joined Charlie Kirk to discuss a significant Supreme Court ruling that upheld Tennessee's law banning gender transition procedures on minors. Walsh described the decision as "a historic win" and "probably the final nail in the coffin" for the transgender medical industry.
The Supreme Court found that Tennessee's law regulating and banning these procedures is valid and constitutional, which means that dozens of states across the country with similar bans will see those laws stand. More importantly, Walsh argued, this ruling removes any excuse for Republicans in Congress not to pass a federal ban on these procedures.
Understanding the Legal Arguments
Walsh explained that the Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of gender transition procedures themselves or declare them unconstitutional nationwide. Instead, the Court determined that state bans do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
The opposition's argument was that these bans discriminate based on sex, which Walsh called absurd. He explained that the law simply states you cannot castrate and mutilate a child for the purpose of changing their gender, regardless of the child's sex. The law applies equally to male and female children.
Walsh pointed out a critical flaw in the opposition's argument: for something to violate the Equal Protection Clause through discrimination, it must be based on an immutable characteristic. However, even trans activists claim that gender identity is not immutable and can change from day to day. This contradiction undermined their entire legal strategy.
Why This Marks the End for Trans Activists
Walsh characterized this decision as "the fatal blow" to the trans activist movement because it was their only hope. For years, as cultural attitudes shifted against them and states passed protective laws, trans activists remained confident that courts would bail them out.
Now that the courts have not intervened, trans activists are left on a level playing field where they must make the actual argument for why society should chemically castrate children. Walsh confidently stated they cannot win this argument because "the argument is insane."
He estimated that this is not even an 80-20 issue, but more like a 95-5 issue, with the number of Americans who actually support chemically castrating children being "vanishingly small."
The Path to a Federal Ban
Charlie Kirk asked about the implications for a nationwide ban, including President Trump's executive order currently in the courts. Walsh explained that Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene already has a bill that codifies Trump's executive order on this issue.
Walsh emphasized this is one of those rare moments in politics where the clearly morally right thing to do is also the clearly politically popular thing to do. This makes it a total winner for Republicans, and there's simply no reason not to pursue it.
He stressed the importance of protecting children in so-called "trans sanctuary states" like California. Children born in those states deserve protection too, and shouldn't be subjected to chemical castration and surgical procedures that will injure them permanently.
Forcing Democrats to Defend the Indefensible
Walsh pointed out that passing a federal ban would force Democrats to get on the record making the case for why it's okay to cut the breasts off of 15-year-old girls and castrate 12-year-old boys. He stated confidently that Democrats do not want this fight and would rather the issue just go away.
Democrats are hoping Republicans will be satisfied with the Supreme Court victory and move on. Walsh argued this is exactly why they cannot do that. He referenced Elizabeth Warren's statement calling the decision insensitive to young kids and their parents, suggesting Republicans should welcome that debate openly.
Kirk agreed, suggesting the 2026 midterms or 2028 election should partially focus on whether the country should have a castration business that profits off the removal of children's genitals.
The Decade-Long Battle for Public Opinion
Kirk asked Walsh to reflect on the journey from 2015 to today regarding public opinion on this issue. Walsh offered an interesting perspective: he doesn't believe public opinion actually changed that much.
Walsh argued that if you had polled Americans in 2019 or 2020 about men in women's sports and bathrooms, or gender transition procedures on kids, many would have answered in support. However, he doesn't think most of them actually believed those positions.
Instead, Walsh believes trans activists never actually persuaded people. For five to seven years, they successfully scared people into silence through emotional blackmail. This campaign was ruthless and relentless, blindsiding many Americans.
The most sinister application of this emotional blackmail targeted parents. Parents who had never heard of the trans issue were suddenly told that if they didn't let their child transition, the child would commit suicide. Many parents simply didn't know how to respond to such jarring claims.
Walsh concluded that the first half of this decade-long fight was characterized by people being scared into silence, but that era has now ended with this Supreme Court victory.
