Up Next
Examining Internet Theories About Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University Without Drawing Conclusions
20:52
Dave Rubin and Russell Brand Process the Shooting of Charlie Kirk in Raw Real-Time Conversation
24:53
Bari Weiss and Ben Shapiro Mourn Charlie Kirk After Assassination at Utah Valley University
1:24:32
Matt Walsh Calls Charlie Kirk Assassination an Act of LGBT Terrorism Demanding Federal Crackdown
Matt Walsh examines the evidence surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination at Utah Valley University, arguing that the shooting represents a coordinated act of left-wing LGBT terrorism. Walsh details the shooter Tyler Robinson's relationship with a transgender-identifying individual, Antifa messaging engraved on ammunition, and social media posts that allegedly predicted the attack. He criticizes leftist narratives attempting to portray the shooter as a right-wing extremist, calls for federal investigations into organizations like Reddit as breeding grounds for domestic terrorism, and demands the dismantling of what he describes as left-wing terror cells. Walsh advocates for RICO charges against billionaires like George Soros, deportation of Ilhan Omar, and a complete federal ban on gender-affirming care at any age.
The Evidence of LGBT Terrorism
Matt Walsh presents what he calls overwhelming evidence that Charlie Kirk's assassination was an act of LGBT terrorism. According to Walsh, Charlie was murdered by a leftist in a relationship with a man who identifies as transgender. The shooter engraved his ammunition with messages commonly used by left-wing Antifa groups, calling Charlie a fascist, as well as references to fetish subcultures.
Walsh cites multiple sources indicating that the investigation has revealed the shooter's deep connections to left-wing extremism. Days before the murder, several trans-identifying individuals and people in their social groups posted messages on social media suggesting they had advance knowledge of the attack. One message read: "Charlie Kirk is coming to my college tomorrow. I really hope someone evaporates him literally. Let's just say something big will happen tomorrow." The account that posted this has since been suspended from X.
Another post from five days before the shooting indicated that "something big was coming soon." After the shooting, the same author wrote: "Well, that's that. And another Chud bites the dust." Walsh highlights a particularly disturbing post from September 3rd that read: "It'd be funny if someone like Charlie Kirk got shot on September 10th."
Coordinated Network and Advanced Knowledge
According to Walsh, the username of one author was "Tally Hall album." The man who shot Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson, had a publicly visible playlist of songs by the band Tally Hall on Spotify. Additionally, the shooter's transgender-identifying boyfriend was active on the Tally Hall subreddit, suggesting a connected network of individuals.
Walsh argues these publicly available posts indicate the actual number of people with advanced knowledge of the attack was probably quite high. Shortly after the assassination, another post written by someone in the same friend network as the trans-identifying man dating the shooter read simply: "We effing did it."
A pro-trans organization in Utah called Armed Queers SLC took down its Instagram page entirely following the assassination. According to the New York Post, Armed Queers SLC has a logo featuring two high-powered rifle rounds similar to the one that struck Kirk. The group also hosted a lecture on queer resistance at the University of Utah in September 2023, around 45 miles from Utah Valley University where the 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder lost his life.
Protecting the Shooter After the Attack
Walsh reports that even people with direct knowledge of the shooter continued to protect him after the assassination. The New York Times reported that members of the shooter's Discord channel were joking with him about the possibility that he was the shooter based on photographs released by the FBI. Yet none of the members of this Discord group turned him in.
This evidence comes on top of statements from numerous officials, including the governor, that Robinson was heavily indoctrinated into left-wing extremism. Walsh emphasizes that sources from the family and people who knew the shooter have confirmed this characterization.
Mass Celebration and the Left's Response
Walsh argues that perhaps the clearest sign that Charlie was murdered as part of a coordinated leftist campaign to terrorize conservatives is that over the past several days, his killers' comrades have tried to disown him. This is happening even as hundreds of thousands of leftists openly gloat over Charlie's murder—everyone from neurologists to school teachers to military service members to entertainers to the chief of police of Durham to the entire population of Reddit and Blue Sky.
Despite this widespread celebration, Walsh notes these same leftists are pretending in defiance of all evidence and basic common sense that the shooter was actually a MAGA white supremacist. They're pushing the fantasy that Charlie Kirk was murdered because he wasn't right-wing enough. Walsh insists they know it's not true and that no rational person could possibly believe it, but they're saying it anyway.
The Left's Disinformation Campaign
Walsh describes the official talking point of the left as claiming Charlie was killed by the right. He characterizes this as a maneuver that has always been an old standby for communist regimes. According to Walsh, leftists don't care about their foot soldiers, even those who throw their lives away for the cause. They certainly don't care about the truth. All that matters to leftists is their collective mission.
The shooter fulfilled part of the left's mission by killing Charlie—by murdering someone who dared to engage them in free and open debates they could not win. Now the shooter is fulfilling another mission as a useful tool to defame and malign the right.
Walsh provides numerous examples of this narrative being pushed across social media platforms. On Reddit, which he calls "one of the many cesspools that should immediately be investigated by federal authorities as a breeding ground for domestic terrorism," posts claim: "The Bellachow thing found on the ammo casings is a Nick Fuentes thing. He seems like an online Nick Fuentes Groper." When someone asks what a Groper is, the response is: "Alt-right white nationalist, Christian nationalist followers of Nick Fuentes."
Walsh emphasizes it's impossible to overstate how aggressively this message is being pushed on Reddit and Blue Sky. It's all over Facebook and throughout the internet. The media is toying with this message as well. He says it's not an exaggeration to claim that the majority of leftists probably believe it.
The Truth About Bella Ciao
Walsh refutes the narrative that the shooter was connected to right-wing ideology. They're claiming that a gay man who was dating a trans-identifying man, who openly told his family and friends that he hated Charlie Kirk, who was steeped in left-wing ideology according to the governor of Utah, who wrote Antifa messages on the bullet casings, who accused Charlie of being a fascist, was actually a big fan of Nick Fuentes and a far-right extremist.
Walsh clarifies that Antifa terrorists have been citing the Bella Ciao song for a long time, as Andy Ngo has pointed out. This includes in 2019 when an Antifa shooter cited the song in a manifesto before attacking an ICE facility. There is a record and precedent not just for this Bella Ciao reference to be used by the far left, but for it to be used by the far left when carrying out domestic terrorist attacks. Additionally, one of the ringleaders of Antifa in Los Angeles owns a company called Bella Ciao Cinema. This is an old World War II song that's been repurposed by Antifa today.
Mainstream Media Complicity
Walsh accuses prominent outlets like CNN of doing their best to further the false narrative. He describes a screenshot of CNN's homepage showing nine stories about Charlie's assassination. None of them discuss the shooter's motive or his belief in left-wing ideology and his connection to transgenderism. None discuss the gloating of leftists or the messages that predicted the attack. Instead, the stories focus on the job Kash Patel is doing, how leftists are getting fired for celebrating Kirk's death, or how the shooter's father turned him in.
Walsh highlights major figures in the American left openly lying on social media. Harvard professor Lawrence Tribe posted: "Kirk's apparent assassin seems to have been ultra MAGA, exploding the GOP MAGA attempt to pin the blame for this tragedy on liberals." Walsh notes this is the same line used after the first Trump assassination attempt, when Democrats said the shooting was either staged or that the shooter was somehow a Trump supporter.
The chair of Minnesota's DFL, essentially the state Democrat party, posted: "The shooter didn't think Kirk was right-wing enough. The reference to Groer is linked to a rival right-wing ideologue." Walsh characterizes this as a declarative statement from a top Democrat in Minnesota that has no basis in reality, with references to Gropers without any citation whatsoever.
Government Officials Spreading Lies
Walsh reports that the LA Times apparently cited an expert who decided Charlie Kirk was shot in a white supremacist gang attack. Then there's a post from Jackie Sartorius, the district attorney in Portland, Maine, who was installed with the help of George Soros. She posted: "There are now increasing questions about the actual shooter's possible affinity with the extreme far right. This may have involved a beef between alt-right Nick Fuentes and the victim." Walsh emphasizes this is a government official, a prosecutor who's supposed to care about things like evidence and facts.
On X, posts with tens of millions of views and hundreds of thousands of likes spread the same message that the shooter was a right-winger. Walsh provides examples, including one with 30 million views and 400,000 likes claiming: "So, the killer of Charlie Kirk is Tyler Robinson, white boy, right-wing Republican, wealthy family born and raised in Utah. This is a bad week for MAGA."
Another post with 10 million views and 100,000 likes states: "According to Utah officials and police interviews with his family, Tyler Robinson hated Charlie Kirk because Kirk wasn't conservative enough. Robinson reportedly admired Nick Fuentes."
Teachers Union President Spreads Misinformation
Walsh identifies one of the worst examples as Randi Weingarten, the president of the largest teachers union in the country. She reposted content from someone named Jeannie Ryder that said: "The leftist students in Utah who didn't want Charlie Kirk to speak did what leftists do. They signed petitions, staged a protest, and lined up to challenge him. The right-winger who didn't want Charlie Kirk to speak did what right-wingers do and shot him. We are not the same."
Weingarten reposted this with the caption: "This seems important to state." Walsh emphasizes that the leader of the largest teachers union in the country considers it not only important to state total nonsense and lies that completely flip reality on its head, but also to brand all right-wingers as violent killers.
Walsh notes that on Reddit or Blue Sky you'll find hundreds of thousands of people liking and upvoting various posts like this. If you know any leftists, there's a good chance you're seeing the same content all over your social media feeds. None of it is remotely true. There's no source for any of it because it's false.
The Undeniable Truth
Walsh states emphatically that any suggestion Charlie was killed by a right-winger is a flat-out bald-faced lie. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. All of the evidence points to left-wing LGBT extremists. It's not close. It's not ambiguous: gay shooter, trans boyfriend, Antifa messages on the bullets, trans people predicting the shooting ahead of time. This was not a Groper. This is not a Nick Fuentes acolyte.
Walsh adds that even if the killer were a right-wing extremist, which he definitively was not, the left would still own Charlie's murder because they've taken ownership of it. They've spent the last four days since his assassination celebrating, and thousands upon thousands of them have personally endorsed the man who slaughtered Charlie. Even if the shooter were a right-wing Republican, which he is not, he would still now be one of theirs by adoption. They own this because they have said so themselves.
Why Charlie Kirk Was Targeted
Walsh reflects on what Charlie Kirk provided to American discourse and why he was targeted. Charlie Kirk's public debates have been recorded for many years, and those debates prove the exact opposite of the points leftists try to make against him. That's why hundreds of thousands of students, including Democrats, showed up to his events. They knew they wouldn't get shouted down. They wouldn't get violently attacked unless it was by one of their own. They wouldn't suffer any consequences whatsoever. They'd be able to engage with a leading conservative voice at length in a respectful forum.
Walsh emphasizes this is something nobody on the left ever does. None of them ever do this. Who on the left is going into a crowd where there's going to be conservatives and saying: "You know what? I'll talk to any of you right now. I'll debate you on camera live. Line up. If you disagree with me, come to the front of the line." Walsh insists not a single person on the left in the country is doing it. That's something only conservatives do, and Charlie was the best at it.
The footage was uploaded in its entirety online. It's one of the main reasons so many young men voted Republican in the last election. Charlie allowed leftists to speak, and in doing so, they revealed they were unhinged, incoherent, dangerous radicals. That's why they killed him, according to Walsh.
Ilhan Omar's Response
Walsh highlights Ilhan Omar, whom he calls "the darling of the Democrat party," and her response to Kirk's assassination. She reposted a video declaring: "Kirk was a reprehensible human being, a stochastic terrorist. With his last dying words, he was spewing racist dog whistles. Charlie Kirk was Dr. Frankenstein, and his monster shot him through the neck."
She then gave an interview in which she suggested Kirk had it coming because he wasn't a fan of Juneteenth and didn't believe George Floyd was murdered. In the interview, Omar stated: "What I do know for sure is that Charlie was someone who once said guns save lives after a school shooting. Charlie was someone who was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd in the hands of Minneapolis police. I think you called him a scumbag, right? Have no regard. Downplay slavery and what black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth should never exist. And I think there are a lot of people who are out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate. Complete rewriting of history. There is nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so."
Walsh argues this is a complete rewriting of history and that even if Charlie were the bully they're painting him to be, which he wasn't at all, that still obviously wouldn't be any justification to murder him. If Ilhan Omar were a decent American or an American at all, she'd understand that, Walsh contends.
The Left's Monopoly on Political Violence
Walsh insists this is not a both-sides issue. Political violence is almost exclusive to the left. The left is responsible for torching federal courthouses, churches, and small businesses. They're responsible for BLM riots and Antifa. They're responsible for the massacre of Christian children in schools and churches, multiple attempts on the president's life, and violent attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers. They're responsible for vandalizing Teslas and torching Tesla storefronts. They're the ones attacking ICE agents and police.
The left has a near monopoly on politically motivated violence in this country, Walsh argues. It was a Tim Walz appointee apparently suffering from schizophrenia who murdered a lawmaker in Minnesota. It was Trump supporters and Trump supporters alone who died on January 6th, which is the one example leftists can give of right-wing political violence. That's the only example they can give, which they've greatly exaggerated for the last five years, and the only people who died were Trump supporters.
Political violence has been going in only one direction for a very long time, and that is by design, according to Walsh. The left's domestic terror operation is well established at this point.
The Criminal Enterprise Behind Left-Wing Terror
Walsh describes how the system works: Billionaires like George Soros fund various NGOs, political candidates, and media personalities who talk like Ilhan Omar. They declare that conservatives are Nazis, that all conservatives are fascists who demonize oppressed people. When you go around calling people Nazis, Walsh argues, that is a direct call for violence against that person. At the very least, it is a justification beforehand for violence.
They tell highly disturbed individuals, particularly people who identify as trans, that they're being genocided by these fascists. They'll open the prisons and allow the most deranged members of society to continue tormenting normal people. Walsh notes we don't even add to the discussion the everyday street violence that happens because violent criminals are released onto the street by politically motivated left-wing district attorneys and judges.
The politicians and billionaires sit back and watch as their deranged foot soldiers carry out acts of domestic terrorism. After these terrorist attacks are carried out, the politicians gloat and blame the other side, showing clear consciousness of guilt. Among other things, this is a criminal enterprise—maybe the single most dangerous criminal enterprise to ever exist in this country because it poses a direct threat to the most important civil liberty: the right to free expression. It needs to be dismantled.
What Dismantling Means
Walsh outlines specific actions that should be taken. Billionaires like George Soros can be indicted on RICO charges, as Donald Trump himself suggested. Criminal aliens like Ilhan Omar could be denaturalized and deported immediately for lying on their applications for citizenship when they pledged loyalty to America and, in her case, allegedly weren't married to their brother.
The entire industry of transgenderism can be demolished overnight with a national federal ban on any kind of so-called gender-affirming care for anyone of any age. The so-called doctors who would mutilate and sterilize patients in service of this ideology can be sent to federal prison.
All of these steps are necessary and can happen after Charlie's assassination and the facts that have been gathered in the aftermath, Walsh argues. There's no doubt about it: terrorism against conservatives is only going to intensify from here.
Previous Threats and Inaction
Walsh recalls that a year ago at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the president of the Young Democratic Socialists of America threatened to shoot up the local Turning Point USA chapter, forcing a Turning Point representative to flee the campus. The socialist said: "I'd line all you mother effers up against the wall and shoot you." Nothing was done. The DSA chapter wasn't dismantled.
That's normally how these things go, Walsh observes. The left terrorizes, the right doesn't respond, and in turn, the terrorism intensifies. This must end. It is now abundantly clear that America isn't divided into two political parties. We're divided into one political party and one cartel that aids and abets domestic terrorism.
Trans Ideology as a Death Cult
Walsh argues that leftists are deliberately provoking some of the most deranged and hopeless members of society—people who are already in a state of deep-seated psychosis. Now that those individuals are realizing they're losing, that they really can't transform into members of the opposite sex, that they're on the losing side of everything, they're doing exactly what the left wants them to do.
The LGBT terror cells have been activated, and they're effective terror cells because trans ideology is a death cult—the largest, most well-funded, most deranged death cult this country has ever seen, according to Walsh. We shouldn't be surprised by this. Two weeks ago, Walsh said on X and on his show that trans extremists are losing badly, they're desperate, and that makes them more dangerous than they've ever been. He said it would get worse. Two weeks later, Charlie Kirk was shot and killed by an LGBT militant with a trans boyfriend.
The Path Forward
Walsh says again now: this will get worse. We need to take this threat seriously. That doesn't mean delivering speeches about unity or singing kumbaya and telling everyone to come together. It means utterly destroying every left-wing terror cell like the one that killed Charlie. It also means destroying the criminal institutions that are enabling their insanity rather than treating it. Then we have to move up the chain of leftist terror to the nonprofits and the billionaires.
The more they gloat over Charlie's dead body and the more they threaten to murder more conservatives, the harder we have to push. We cannot stop until conservatives are free to exercise their First Amendment rights in this country without fear. Until that happens, we don't have a free society. We don't have any rights at all to any meaningful degree. In that environment, we don't owe our enemies any kind of restraint or mercy. They must be crushed if civil liberties are going to mean anything in America.
Walsh concludes that all the indications he has are that the Trump administration understands this and that they're acting legally and nonviolently, which is how we must act. Now they need to do something the federal government never did under the previous administration: defend the civil liberties of American citizens and disarm and dismantle every domestic terrorist organization and militant LGBT group posing as a legitimate political institution. That's a very long list to get through, but with ruthlessness and without apology, now is the time to start.
Video Transcript
It's one of the main reasons so many
young men voted Republican in the last
election. He allowed leftists to speak
and in doing so they revealed that they
were unhinged, incoherent, dangerous
radicals, which is why they killed them.
A day after Charlie Kirk was
assassinated while debating college
students in Utah, uh I said that it was
important to gather as much information
as possible before drawing any
conclusions about culpability and before
implementing the kind of crackdown on
left-wing extremism in this country that
for many years we've all suspected would
be necessary. Well, now several days
later, we have gathered those facts. The
assassination of Charlie Kirk was
unequivocally an act of LGBT terrorism.
Now, more evidence will come out soon,
and that's also what I've been told
personally from sources who are familiar
with uh the FBI's investigation, but
already the evidence is overwhelming.
Charlie was murdered by a leftist who
was in a relationship with a man who
identifies as transgender, a man who
identifies as a woman. The shooter
engraved his ammunition with messages
that are commonly used by left-wing
Antifa groups, calling uh uh Charlie a
fascist, as well as a reference to a
fetish subculture. Days before the
murder, several transidentifying
individuals and people in their social
groups posted messages on social media
indicating that they were aware that the
assassination would soon take place. One
of those messages read, "Charlie Kirk is
coming to my college tomorrow. I really
hope someone evaporates him literally.
Let's just say something big will happen
tomorrow. The account that posted that
thread is now suspended from X. Another
post from 5 days before the shooting
indicated that something big was coming
soon. Then after the shooting, the
author wrote, "Well, that's that." And
another Chud bites the dust. Um, here's
another. This one was written on
September 3rd. It begins, quote, "It'd
be funny if someone like Charlie Kirk
got shot on September 10th."
Now, the username of the author of this
post, as Cassandra McDonald of Gateway
Pundit has pointed out, is Tally Hall
album. And coincidentally enough, the
man who shot Charlie Kirk, Tyler
Robinson, had a publicly visible
playlist of songs by the band Tally Hall
on Spotify. And additionally, the
shooter's transidentifying boyfriend
McDonald reported was active on the
Italy Hall subreddit.
That's just a sample of some publicly
available posts that appeared to predict
Charlie Charlie's murder. Uh we can
obviously assume based on these posts
that the actual number of people with
advanced knowledge of the attack was
probably quite high. Additionally, short
shortly after the assassination, another
post written by someone who was in the
same friend network as a
transidentifying man who was dating the
shooter read simply, "We effing did it."
And then a protrans organization Utah
called Armed Queers SLC took down its
Instagram page entirely. According to
New York Post, Armed Queers SLC has a
quote logo that features two
high-powered rifle rounds similar to the
one that struck Kirk. The group also
quote hosted a lecture on queer
resistance at the University of Utah in
September 2023 around 45 miles from Utah
Valley University where the 31-year-old
Turning Point USA founder and Trump ally
lost his life.
Even people with direct knowledge of the
shooter continued to protect him after
the assassination. The New York Times is
reporting that members of the shooters
discord channel were joking with him
about the possibility that he was the
shooter based on the photographs
released by the FBI. And yet none of the
members of this discord group uh
actually turned him in.
But and this is all evidence on on top
of uh a number of officials telling us
including the governor that he was
heavily indoctrinated into leftwing
extremism. Uh hearing these sources from
the family, from people who knew him. Uh
so the evidence again is absolutely
overwhelming.
But maybe the clearest possible sign
that Charlie was murdered as part of a
coordinated leftist campaign to
terrorize conservatives is that over the
past several days his comrades have
tried to uh disown him. Even as hundreds
of thousands of leftists openly gloat
over Charlie's murder. And this is
everyone ranging from neurologists to
school teachers to military service
members to entertainers to the chief of
police of Durham to the entire
population of Reddit and Blue Sky. Even
as all that's happening, these same
leftists are pretending in defiance of
all the evidence and of basic common
sense that the shooter was actually a
MAGA white supremacist. They're pushing
the fantasy that Charlie Kirk was
murdered because he wasn't right-wing
enough.
Now, they know that it's not true. They
know that no rational person could
possibly believe it, but they're saying
it anyway. The official talking point of
the left is that Charlie was killed by
the right.
This is a maneuver that for communist
regimes has always been an old standby.
They don't actually care about their
foot soldiers, even foot soldiers who
throw their lives away for the cause.
They certainly don't care about the
truth. All that matters to leftists is
their collective mission. The shooter
fulfilled part of the left's mission by
killing Charlie, by murdering someone
who dared to engage them in free and
open debates that they could not win.
And now the shooter is fulfilling
another mission. He's a useful tool to
defame and malign the right.
Now, there are too many examples on this
front to list, but here's a few. We'll
start with Reddit, uh, one of the many
cesspools that should immediately be
investigated by federal authorities as a
breeding ground for domestic terrorism.
But here's a sample of the post. Quote,
"The Bellachow thing found on the ammo
casings is a Nick Fuentes thing. He
seems like an online Nick Fuentes
Groper."
Yep. Gropers have been against Charlie
Kirk for a long time. Then some when
someone asks what a groper is, the
response is quote, "Altright uh white
nationalist, Christian nationalist
followers of Nick Fuentes."
It's impossible to overstate how
aggressively this message is is being
pushed on Reddit and Blue Sky. It's also
all over Facebook. It's all over the
internet. Uh the media is is toying with
this message as well. It's not an
exaggeration to say that the majority of
leftists probably believe it.
They're claiming that a gay man who was
dating a transidentifying man, who
openly told his family and friends that
he hated Charlie Kirk, who was steeped
in leftwing ideology according to the
governor of Utah, who wrote Antifa
messages on the bullet casings, who
accused Charlie of being a fascist,
was actually in truth, you know, a big
fan of Nick Fuentes, was a was a big big
uh far-right right-wing guy.
To be clear, Antifa terrorists have been
citing the Bella Chow song for uh a long
time, as Andy know has has pointed out,
including in 2019 when an Antifa shooter
cited the song in a manifesto before
attacking an ICE facility.
So there is a record, there's a
precedent, not just for this Bellachow
thing to be used by the far left, but
for it to be used by the far left when
they're carrying out domestic terrorist
attacks.
Additionally, one of the ring leaders of
Antifa in Los Angeles owns a company
called Bella Chow Cinema. This is an old
World War II song that's been repurposed
by Antifa today. You know, everyone
who's looks into this knows it. It's
very obvious,
but uh in the leftwing fever swamps,
they're pretending otherwise.
Prominent outlets like CNN are are doing
their best to further the same
narrative. Take a look at at this
screenshot of CNN's homepage the other
day. Um, there are nine stories about
Charlie's assassination. None of them
discuss the shooter's motive or his
belief in left-wing ideology and his
connection to transgenderism. None of
them discuss the gloating of leftists or
the messages that predicted the attack.
Instead, the stories are about the job
that Cash Patel is doing or how leftists
are getting fired for celebrating Kirk's
death or how the shooter's father turned
him in. Meanwhile, all over social
media, major figures in America, the
American left, are openly lying. Uh
here's Harvard professor Lawrence Tribe
for example. Quote, "Kirk's apparent
assassin seems to have been ultra MAGA,
exploding the GOP MAGA attempt to pin
the blame for this tragedy on liberals."
This is the same line that they used
after the first Trump assassination
attempt. As you probably remember,
Democrats said the shooting was either
staged or that the shooter was somehow a
Trump supporter, which they still claim
to this day.
Only this time, we're not just hearing
that claim from a handful of big names.
is coming from everywhere. Here's the
chair of Minnesota's DFL, for example.
This is basically the state uh Democrat
party. Quote, "The shooter didn't think
Kirk was right-wing enough. The
reference to Groer is linked to a rival
right-wing ideologue."
This is a declarative statement from a
top Democrat in Minnesota that has no
basis in reality. He talks about a
reference to gropers with no citation
whatsoever. It's completely made up.
Meanwhile, the LA Times apparently cited
an expert who decided that Charlie Kirk
was shot in a white supremacist gang
head. And then there's this post from
Jackie Sartorius, the DA in Portland,
Maine, who was recently installed with
the help of George Soros. She uh wants
you to know that quote, "There are now
increasing questions about the actual
shooter's possibil possible affinity
with the extreme far right. This may
have involved a beef between alt-right
Nick Fuentes and the victim.
That's a government official, a
prosecutor who's supposed to care about
things like evidence and facts and well,
so much for that. Over on X, you'll find
posts with tens of millions of views and
hundreds of thousands of likes with the
exact same message. Huge numbers of
people are spreading the claim that the
shooter was was a right-winger. The
totally false, fabricated, madeup, no
basis in reality claim. Here's one
example. This one has 30 million views,
400,000 likes.
says, quote, "So, the killer char of
Charlie Kirk is Tyler Robinson, white
boy, right-wing Republican, wealthy
family born and raised in Utah. This is
a bad week for MAGA." Here's another
one. This one has 10 million views and
100,000 likes. According to Utah
officials and police interviews with his
family, Tyler Robinson hated Charlie
Kirk because Kirk wasn't conservative
enough.
Robinson reportedly admired Nick
Fuentes. GOP is now scrubbing exposts
about Dems faster than DOJ erases Trump
name and Epstein files. Perhaps one of
the worst examples is Randy Weine
Garden, the president of the largest
teachers union in the country. She
reposted a post from someone named
Jeannie Ryder. And the post says, "The
leftist students in Utah who didn't want
Charlie Kirk to speak did what leftists
do. They signed petition, staged a
protest, and lined up to challenge him.
The right-winger who didn't want Charlie
Kirk to speak did what right-wingers do
and shot him. We are not the same." Now,
Randy reposted that uh inverted reality
nonsense with the caption, "This seems
important to state."
Yes, the leader of of the largest
teacher teachers union in the country.
To her, it's not only important to state
total absolute nonsense and lies that
completely flip reality on its head. But
it's also important to brand all
right-wingers as violent killers.
Go on Reddit or Blue Sky and you'll find
hundreds of thousands of people who are
liking and upvoting various posts like
this. If you know any leftists, there's
a good chance you're seeing the same
content all over your social media feeds
as well. None of it is remotely true.
There's no source for any of it because
because it's it's false. Just to be
totally clear about this, any suggestion
that Charlie was killed by a
right-winger is a flatout bald-faced
lie. There is no evidence of that. None
at all. All of the evidence points to
left-wing LGBT extremists. It's not
close. It's not ambiguous,
gay guy, trans trans boyfriend,
Antifa messages on the bullets,
trans people predicting the shooting
ahead of time. I mean, this is not this
is not close.
This was not a Groper. This is not a
Nick Fuentes acolyte. And by the way,
even if the killer was a right-wing
extremist, which which he definitely
unequivocally was not, the left would
still own Charlie's murder because
they've taken ownership of it. They
spent the last four days since his
assassination celebrating and mass
thousands upon thousands of them have
personally endorsed the man who
slaughtered Charlie. So that even if the
guy were a right-wing Republican, which
again he is not,
he would still now be one of theirs by
adoption. They own this because they
have said so themselves. Thousands of
them have have said that.
They've said, "We support this. We like
it. Do it more."
But again, the killer is not rightwing.
Yeah. There's no point in facteing like
this really. There's no point in
engaging with any of the people who are
posting this content and trying to
persuade them that based on the evidence
they're wrong.
That's what Charlie attempted to do.
What he what he did with unmatched skill
uh and and not to mention patience
debating and engaging with these people.
The left has made the decision to
respond to that kind of dialogue with
violence. And when I say the left, I'm
not using shortorthhand. I'm not
painting with too broad a brush.
I'm talking about the left
and all of their extremist groups, of
which there are many.
I'm referring to Antifa. I'm referring
to sites like Reddit and Blue Sky. Most
of all, I'm referring to the Democrat
party. All these organizations are
dominated by and under the complete
control of demons who either
participated in the murder murder of
Charlie participated in other uh
domestic terrorist attacks uh
politically motivated or who celebrated.
They resemble a domestic terror cell
because that's exactly what they are
and they need to be treated like it. If
you think that's overstated, uh, here's
Ilhan Omar, the darling of the Democrat
party, one of them. Her response to
Kirk's assassination was to repost a
video declaring that, quote, "Kirk was a
reprehensible human being, a stoastic
terrorist. With his last dying words, he
was spewing racist dog whistles. Charlie
Kirk was Dr. Frankenstein, and his
monster shot him through the neck."
Then she gave this interview in which
she suggested that Kirk had it coming
because he wasn't a fan of Junth and
didn't believe the myth that uh George
Floyd was murdered. Watch.
What what I do know for sure is that you
know Charlie was someone who once said
um you know guns save lives
um after a a school shooting. Um,
Charlie was someone who was willing to
debate and downplay the death of George
Floyd uh in the hands of Minneapolis
police.
I think you called him a scumbag,
right? Have no regard. Um, downplay
slavery and what black people have gone
through in in this country uh by saying
Juneen should never exist. Um, and I and
I think you know the the there are a lot
of people who are out there talking
about him just wanting to have a civil
debate.
complete rewriting of a complete
rewriting of history.
Yeah, there is nothing um more effed up,
you know, like uh than to than to
completely pretend that, you know, his
words and actions
um have not been recorded and and and in
existence um for for the last decade or
so.
And and
Charlie Kirk's public debates have been
recorded for many years. She's right
about that. And those debates prove the
exact opposite of the point she's trying
to make. That's why hundreds of
thousands of students, including
Democrats, showed up to his events.
They knew that they wouldn't get shouted
down. They wouldn't get violently
attacked
unless it was by one of their own.
They wouldn't suffer any consequences
whatsoever. they'd be able to engage
with a leading conservative voice at
length in a respectful forum,
which by the way is something that
nobody on the left ever does ever. None
of them ever do this.
Who on the left is going into a crowd
where there's going to be conservatives
and saying, "You know what? I'll talk to
any of you right now. I'll debate you on
camera live.
Line up. If you disagree with me, come
to the front of the line." Who on the
left is doing that? None of them, not a
single one in the country is doing it.
That's is something that only
conservatives do only. And Charlie was
the best at it.
And we know all that. The footage was
uploaded in its entirety online. That's
what Charlie provided. It's one of the
main reasons so many young men voted
Republican in the last election. He
allowed leftists to speak. And in doing
so, they reveal that they were unhinged,
incoherent, dangerous radicals, which is
why they killed him.
But really, none of this matters. Even
if Charlie were the bully that they're
painting him to be, which he wasn't at
all, uh that still obviously wouldn't be
any justification to murder him. And if
Ian Omar were a decent American or an
American at all, she'd understand that.
So would the rest of the Democrat party.
Instead, within hours of Charlie's
assassination,
in a terrorist attack designed to
silence conservatives, they're gloating
over his body and encouraging more
violence against Charlie's wife,
against any other conservative who steps
out of line.
Only the left operates like this. The
left is responsible. I mean, it really,
this is not a both sides thing, okay?
This is not both sides. It is not.
Political violence is almost exclusive
to the left.
Nearly exclusive.
The left is responsible for torching
federal courouses, churches, small
businesses. They're responsible for BLM
riots, Antifa. Responsible for the
massacre of Christian children in
schools and churches. Responsible for
multiple attempts on the president's
life as well as the violent attacks on
pro-life pregnancy centers. They're
responsible for vandalizing Teslas,
torching Tesla storefronts. They're the
ones attacking ICE agents. They're the
ones attacking police. The left is a
near monopoly on politically motivated
violence in this country. It was a Tim
Walls appointee apparently suffering
from schizophrenia who murdered the
lawmaker in Minnesota. It was Trump
supporters and Trump supporters alone
who died on January 6th,
which is the one example that they can
actually give of right-wing political
violence, right-wing riots.
That's the only example they can give
which they obviously have greatly
exaggerated for the last 5 years and the
only people who died in that were Trump
supporters.
Political violence has been going in
only one direction for a very long time
now
and that is by design. The left's
domestic terror operation is well
established at this point. Billionaires
like George Soros fund various NOS and
political candidates and media
personalities who talk like Ilhan Omar.
They declare that conservatives are
Nazis, that all conservatives are
fascists who demonize oppressed people
or whatever.
When you go around, we we kind of laugh
it off because it's so ridiculous. It is
ridiculous, but when you go around
calling people Nazis,
okay, that that is a that is a direct
call for violence against that person,
it just is. At the very least, it is a
justification beforehand for violence
when you call somebody a Nazi.
And they tell highly disturbed
individuals, particularly people who
identify as trans, that they're being
genocided
by these fascists.
They'll open the prisons and allow the
most deranged members of society to
continue tormenting normal people, which
is something we don't even add to when
we're talking about left-wing motivated
violence. We're not even adding to the
list the everyday street violence that
it happens because violent criminals are
released onto the street by politically
motivated left-wing DAs and judges.
And the politicians and billionaires sit
back and watch as their deranged foot
soldiers carry out acts of domestic
terrorism. And then after these attacks
of terrorism are carried out, the
politicians gloat and blame the other
side, showing clear consciousness of
guilt.
Among among other things, this is a
criminal enterprise. It's it's maybe the
single most dangerous criminal
enterprise to ever exist in this country
because it poses a direct threat to our
most important civil liberty, which is
the right to free expression.
And it needs to be dismantled.
And I'll tell you what I mean by
dismantled. Billionaires like George
Soros can be indicted on RICO charges,
as Donald Trump himself suggested the
other day.
criminal aliens like Ilhan Omar could be
denaturalized and deported immediately
for lying on their applications for
citizenship
when they pledge loyalty to America
and where they said in her case they
weren't married to their brother.
The entire industry of transgenderism
can be demolished overnight with a
national federal ban on any kind any
kind of so-called gender affirming care
for anyone of any age.
The so-called doctors who would mutilate
and sterilize patients in service of
this ideology can be sent to federal
prison. All of these steps are necessary
and can happen
after Charlie's assassination and the
facts that have been gathered in the
aftermath. There's no doubt about it.
Terrorism against conservatives is only
going to intensifies from here. A year
ago at the University of Minnesota,
DUTH, the president of the Young
Democratic Socialist of America
threatened to shoot up the local Turning
Point USA chapter, forcing a Turning
Point representative to flee the campus.
Quote, "I'd line all you mother efers up
against the wall and shoot you." The
socialist said, "Nothing was done. The
DSA chapter wasn't dismantled."
And that's normally how these things go.
The left terrorizes, the right doesn't
respond, and in turn, the terrorism
intensifies.
This must end. It is it is now
abundantly clear that America isn't
divided into two political parties.
We're divided into one political party
and one cartel that aids and abetss
domestic terrorism. They are
deliberately provoking some of the most
deranged and hopeless members of
society. People who are already in a
state of deep-seated uh psychosis.
And now that those individuals are
realizing that they're losing,
that they really can't transform into
members of the opposite sex, that, you
know, that they're in the losing side of
everything. They're doing exactly what
the left wants them to do.
The LGBT terror cells have been
activated, and they're effective uh
terror cells because uh because trans
ideology is a death cult, the largest,
most wellfunded, most deranged death
cult this country has ever seen.
And we shouldn't be surprised by this.
You know, two weeks ago
I said on X and on this show that trans
extremists are losing badly. They're
desperate and that makes them more
dangerous than they've ever been.
And I said it would get worse.
Two weeks later, Charlie Kirk was shot
and killed by an LGBT militant with a
trans boyfriend.
So I say again now, this will get worse.
that we need to take this threat
seriously.
That doesn't mean we need to deliver
speeches about unity or sing kumbaya and
tell everyone to come together. It means
we need to utterly destroy
every left-wing terror cell like the one
that killed Charlie.
And it also means that we need to
destroy the criminal institutions that
are enabling their insanity rather than
rather than treating it.
And then we have to move up the chain of
leftist terror to the nonprofits and the
billionaires.
The more they gloat over Charlie's dead
body and the more they threaten to
murder more conservatives, the harder we
have to push.
We cannot stop until conservatives are
free to exercise their First Amendment
rights in this country without fear. And
until that happens, we don't have a free
society.
We don't have any rights at all to any
meaningful degree.
And in that environment, we don't owe
our enemies any kind of restraint or
mercy.
They must be crushed if civil liberties
are going to mean anything in America.
At the moment, all the indications I
have are that the Trump administration
understands all this,
that they're acting legally,
nonviolently,
which is how we must act.
Now they need to do something the
federal government never did under the
previous administration,
which is to defend the civil liberties
of American citizens and disarm and
dismantle every domestic terrorist
organization and militant LGBT group
posing as a legitimate political
institution. That's a very, very long
list to get through,
but with ruthlessness and without
apology,
now is the time to start. If you'd like
to see what else I have to say, you can
access my full show by going to
dailywire.com or by going to the Mattwal
Show Twitter page. Hope to see you
there.