Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Memory at University of Minnesota After Tragic Campus Shooting
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Isabel Brown Honors Charlie Kirk's Legacy at AmericaFest With Andrew Kolvet and Mikey McCoy
1:09:17
Vivek Ramaswamy Honors Charlie Kirk's Legacy at Montana Memorial Event Following Campus Assassination
1:41:04
Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Peacemaking Legacy and Calls for Conservative Unity at AmericaFest
20:47
Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Memory at University of Minnesota After Tragic Campus Shooting
Michael Knowles stepped onto the University of Minnesota campus to fulfill a commitment made to Charlie Kirk before an assassin's bullet took the Turning Point USA founder's life. What was meant to be a conversation between two friends became a powerful tribute to a man who gave his life encouraging healthy debate across America's campuses. With an estimated 4,000 people packing an auditorium built for 2,700, students demonstrated they would not be intimidated into silence. Knowles sat down with students whose lives Charlie transformed, exploring how the 31-year-old conservative leader inspired a generation to embrace faith, engage in civil discourse, and refuse to surrender to forces seeking their destruction.
Michael Knowles and Charlie Kirk were scheduled to host an event together at the University of Minnesota on September 22nd as part of Kirk's American comeback tour. Twelve days before that event could take place, an assassin's bullet took Charlie's life, triggering a national trauma the likes of which had not been seen in decades. The shooting occurred on a campus in Utah, where Kirk was doing what he did best—engaging students in dialogue and debate.
The assassination sent shockwaves through the conservative movement and beyond. As one observer noted, Kirk was killed because his words made a difference. He was described as the voice of a generation who gave voice to a generation, an irreplaceable figure and authentic American genius.
Celebration of Violence From the Left
While many mourned Charlie's death, disturbing reactions emerged from segments of the political left. Social media posts celebrated the killing with comments like "someone had to do it" and "put down like a dog in Utah." One person callously stated, "You know what kind of Nazi is the best Nazi? A dead one."
Knowles expressed disgust at the celebration, noting that Kirk was a man willing to engage in debate to resolve disagreements. The fact that people were celebrating his murder was sickening. Some even claimed Kirk was "not martyr material" and that "his death will mean nothing."
The Tour Must Go On
As the nation mourned, a critical question emerged: Would Charlie's tour continue? Turning Point USA insisted that it must. The organization announced that their campus tour would not only continue that fall but would expand in years to come. Kirk's widow affirmed this decision, stating that in a world filled with chaos, doubt, and uncertainty, her husband's voice would ring out louder and more clearly than ever.
Evil forces thought they could stop Charlie's movement, but his many friends and millions of admirers would not allow that to happen. The University of Minnesota event became the first Turning Point USA gathering since Kirk's death.
4,000 Strong: Refusing to Be Intimidated
The decision to continue the tour raised serious questions about safety. Would students feel comfortable attending amid widespread celebration of political violence against conservatives? The answer was a resounding yes. Campus security estimated 4,000 people showed up to an auditorium that could fit fewer than 2,700, demonstrating they would not be threatened or intimidated into silence.
What was intended to be a conversation between two friends with audience Q&A became a tribute to a man who gave his life to encourage healthy debate throughout the country, especially on campus. The event was for the freshman pledge, the junior sociology major, and all those kids scrolling through clips online, being exposed to new ideas and having their minds changed.
Knowles told the packed auditorium that they must now reassert order and reestablish healthy politics. Those who came out despite the threats and hardship showed they believed it could be done. The man they honored that night gave his life in confident hope that it could be done. He urged them to never despair, never surrender to forces seeking their destruction, and work tirelessly to ensure this moment truly becomes a turning point for America.
Students Whose Lives Charlie Changed
After his remarks, Knowles had the special pleasure of sitting down with students whose lives Charlie had transformed. These young people shared how they first encountered Kirk through Instagram and TikTok videos during high school, typically within the past one to two years.
One student explained that Kirk's impact went beyond politics—he made him a better Christian. The way Charlie spoke about his faith impacted him to become closer to his own faith and learn from Kirk's example.
More Than Just a Talking Head
When Knowles asked what distinguished Kirk from the countless other voices on social media, the students were unanimous: Charlie wasn't just some talking head. He actually lived what he preached and approached people with love. He genuinely wanted people to be better.
Kirk was going to campuses where people disagreed with him, where people were struggling and miserable, and he was trying to get them to a better place. That authenticity resonated deeply. One student agreed with the characterization that Kirk embodied both Rush Limbaugh and Billy Graham in the same person.
Students noted that Charlie always had his facts straight when debating. He would back up his faith with theology but then also return to statistics and concrete examples. This combination of spiritual conviction and factual rigor made him particularly effective.
Why They Hated Him
Knowles observed that the left seemed to hate Kirk with particular intensity, which he initially found strange given that Charlie was among the most moderate and gracious of conservative public figures. The students had insights into why Kirk aroused such ire.
One pointed to how his character shone through—the way he loved God, his family, and his country. Another recalled a clip where Charlie explained why universities hated having him on campus. Kirk had said that universities get students for four years, but if he could talk to them for just 30 seconds, he could change their whole lives. The universities recognized this power, and that's why they hated him.
Walking the Walk
Students repeatedly returned to how Charlie lived his life—that he walked the walk and practiced what he preached. Knowles mentioned that Kirk was one of his few friends with whom he'd never had a cigar and drink because Charlie didn't smoke or drink. He lived up to a very high standard, and students believed this is what really enraged his opponents.
When Knowles asked why they would join a political organization like Turning Point USA if they were seeking religious lessons rather than just joining a Christian campus group, one student explained that public policy affects everyone. Without good students in schools and good people in government, there won't be protection of religion—it will be further encroached upon.
The Eternal and The Political
Knowles praised Charlie for avoiding the trap many fall into—being either purely philosophical or purely political. Kirk was interested simultaneously in the eternal and the most nitty-gritty political details. He was always preaching the gospel and trying to get people to religion, but also focused on specific house races and voter registration efforts in states like Arizona.
Some saw this as a contradiction, but Knowles and the students saw it as coherence. You keep your eyes on the eternal destiny, the heavenly Jerusalem, but we're here with bodies, communities, nations, and families. Those two dimensions are not supposed to be disconnected.
We Have the Numbers
One student observed that the left likes to tell conservatives they don't have the numbers and should stay hidden. At club fairs, Catholics and Turning Point USA are relegated to the farthest back corner. But Kirk was effective at getting youth out and showing that conservatives have the numbers and can make a difference.
Despite Democrats technically winning young voters in 2024, young voters moved 10 points to the right. And who led the young voter efforts? Charlie Kirk. There was no number two. His approach of setting down his microphone, letting the other person talk, being approachable, and welcoming opposing viewpoints while pushing back respectfully made him stand out. He told the truth through his debates, and it was apparent he meant what he said.
Campus Reaction After the Assassination
When Knowles asked about the feeling on campus after the killing, students painted a disturbing picture. At the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, the day after President Trump was elected, students were offered mental health services, therapy dogs, and free food. But after September 10th, when Charlie was killed, students who came to campus grieving and attending vigils found that everyone else seemed pretty fine—even celebrating.
At the University of Minnesota Duluth, one student described hearing every two voices in the hallways celebrating Charlie's death. People who simply tried to have civil debate are not supposed to be murdered for it, regardless of their political affiliation. At a university that in principle endeavors to exchange ideas and arrive at truth, this should represent an existential threat to the institution's mission.
Both-Sidesing Political Violence
One student attended a small private school and had politics class at 9:00 a.m. the day after the assassination. He had been asked by his professor to announce the Minnesota event to the class. When he walked in, his liberal professor dismissed it with "Well, that's not happening" and an "oh well" attitude. The professor talked about political violence and tried to both sides the issue.
The student sat there knowing it was completely different—Kirk wasn't even in government, had no decision-making power, and was just trying to talk to people. Knowles pointed out the absurdity of the comparison, noting that the left can point to perhaps one or two examples of right-to-left political violence, while nearly every example in recent memory runs from left to right, going back through Black Lives Matter to the 1970s and 1960s. Moreover, left-wing political violence often isn't even categorized as such.
Direct Threats Go Unpunished
The students shared harrowing personal experiences with threats on campus. One student who served as president of the Turning Point USA chapter at the University of Minnesota Duluth was threatened by another student who said he would shoot him in the student common area. The student didn't go to school for three weeks and slept on the floor of his buddy's dorm room.
The school's solution was inadequate—they said they couldn't do anything until police finished their investigation, but that meant the threatening student, who was president of the socialist chapter, was still walking around campus. He was charged by police and pled down, but the school wouldn't tell the victim if he would be allowed back on campus. The student transferred schools and became involved with the Turning Point chapter there, while Nathan took over the Duluth chapter.
Another student was literally tabling when that threat happened and witnessed it firsthand. Knowles noted that if the situation had been reversed—if someone had accused these conservative students of a hate crime, no matter how absurd—it would be a statewide news story. But a direct threat to kill a conservative student passes by unnoticed.
Refusing to Live in Fear
Knowles raised a legitimate question about whether students would feel safe attending events after Charlie's assassination. When he told a liberal media outlet the event would proceed, they asked if people would show up or if they were scared. The insinuation was that conservatives should stay home and cede to these threats.
But the students were unequivocal: No, they were not afraid. As one explained, this is the turning point—they would come back stronger than ever. Another literally dropped a class to attend the event. For many, it came down to faith and knowing they were doing the right thing. They wanted Turning Point to still be around when they graduated.
One student articulated a theological perspective: You trust in the Lord, speak the truth, and whatever happens is God's will. As seen with Charlie, God can take something evil and use it to bring the most good. They saw themselves as agents cooperating with God's will.
Charlie's Impact: Converting, Not Just Preaching to the Choir
Knowles addressed the common criticism that Kirk was merely preaching to the choir. While he acknowledged the choir needs preaching, his impression was that Charlie genuinely turned people. The students confirmed this observation from their own experience with friends and classmates.
When the Turning Point chapter at one school started in November 2023, seven people attended the first meeting. After Charlie's death, they had about 30 at meetings and 45 in their group chat. The student predicted that future statistics would show Gen Z becoming more conservative and more Christian—a small revival—and Charlie's legacy would have a huge part in that.
At the University of Minnesota Duluth, membership went from about 30 before Charlie's killing to close to 80 afterward. Many people from moderate positions moved to the right. The impact was everywhere, even beyond youth—family members and neighbors who had been on the sidelines, believing in the conservative movement but not wanting to do anything, saw Charlie's courage and were inspired to get involved.
Charlie Did It Without Advantages
Students noted that Charlie didn't come from money, didn't have a fancy college degree, and didn't have connections to the richest people in the world. He just did it. He outworked everyone. This made his example accessible and inspiring—if Charlie could make such a huge impact by age 31, what excuse did others sitting on their couches have?
What Drives the Movement Forward
Looking to the post-Charlie future, students identified what would drive the movement: hunger for truth, hunger for normalcy and reality. What happened to Charlie is not normal. That shock would drive people to say they want normalcy back. The assassination exposes those celebrating it as completely crazy.
Responding to Those Who Celebrate Murder
When Knowles asked what should happen to people celebrating the murder of the most mainstream civil conversationalist—people who would celebrate the students' murders too—they advocated speaking out to let these people know it's not okay and there will be repercussions. But they emphasized doing it through Christian theology and letting God handle the rest, doing it in a civil way through civil authority when people step out of bounds. The consequences have to continue until behavior improves.
The Movement Continues
The Turning Point Tour continues with Charlie's friends from across the country stepping in to keep the movement moving forward. Students like Elizabeth Kleener, Sam Spain, Nathan McIntyre, and Tifa Feight can hear ideas that have otherwise been banished from campus. And perhaps some ambitious 17-year-old watching will feel called to dedicate himself to advancing the next great American movement, just as Charlie Kirk did.
