Up Next

Candace Owens Responds to Erika Kirk's Fox News Interview About Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories

Candace Owens Responds to Erika Kirk's Fox News Interview About Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories

1:01:46

Candace Owens: Unraveling Questions in Charlie Kirk Shooting Investigation

Candace Owens: Unraveling Questions in Charlie Kirk Shooting Investigation

56:29

Forensic Expert Reveals How Bullet Engravings May Have Saved Lives in Charlie Kirk Shooting

Forensic Expert Reveals How Bullet Engravings May Have Saved Lives in Charlie Kirk Shooting

13:34

Freedom Hat: https://conservativevibes.com/

Donate to Charlie Kirk's UVU Memorial: https://www.givesendgo.com/UVU-Charlie-Kirk?utm_source=sharelink&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_campaign=UVU-Charlie-Kirk

On September 10th I was in the UVU courtyard when a shot rang out and Charlie Kirk was taken from us. Today I'm recreating the shot from the alleged shooter's position. I'm sharing my thoughts and exclusive footage from the event. NONE OF THIS ADDS UP!

#conservative #charliekirk #investigations

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

The FBI is lying to you about Charlie Shooter. I'm going to tell you why. My name is Cameron Vance and I've struggled to make this video because I was there in the crowd that day at UVU when Charlie was shot and assassinated. [�__�] >> We got you. We got you. You're good. I'm not a Navy Seal sniper. I am a gun enthusiast who has done assassination recreations before. I'm going to share my thoughts as someone who was there and has knowledge about guns. I'm also going to respectfully recreate the shot using this 306 here. A big part of the narrative here is that a scoped rifle is the bad guy in the story, not the person behind the trigger. So, we'll see if it really takes a trained sniper to make the shot. While this is under pending investigation, of course, there's going to be all kinds of conspiracy theories and rumors. First, let's do some quick debunking. Conspiracy theorists say that there was a black apparatus on Charlie's shirt. Charlie was wearing the exact same type of microphone as I'm using. It's a DJI. It has a magnet on the back. This is something he often wore in other videos. There's been theories about camera phones that were actually pistols or camera rigs that had some sort of firearm apparatus built into them. I'll tell you right now, no one needed that to get a gun into this event. Yes, you had to register online and get a ticket, but no one was checking tickets at the door. There was no screening. There was no point of entry. Literally, anyone off the street could have entered that courtyard at Utah Valley University from multiple entry points. Bags were not checked. People were not checked. Someone could have an AK-47 in a baby stroller, and none would be the wiser. This is all my footage recording on my iPhone. I'll show you how easy it was to get into this event. So, just coming from the parking lot into one of the buildings, up the hallway, right up to the Hall of Flags, just walk up to this door, and boom, I'm at the event out in the courtyard. Multiple entry points, no ticketing, no screening, no nothing. For context, I was dressed as the Cracker Barrel CEO, full wig and makeup, asking people what they thought about the Cracker Barrel rebrand, and talking to subscribers who'd come up to the event. >> How's it going? I'm actually Julie Msino, the CEO of Cracker Barrel. >> I told my wife there's one person I'm looking for today. There's one person I'm here looking for today. It is freaking CV, dude. >> I was able to get this close to the tent. >> Sorry, guys. Going to squeeze through here >> just by asking to get through. I mean, if I was an evil doer, I am right against the tent. I have not been checked. I have not been screened. >> Right here talking to Charlie's security guard. >> Now, Charlie had six of his own security personnel. There were also planes closed and uniformed officers present, but all eyes were on the crowd facing in at Charlie. No screening, no ticket checking, no drones overhead. All of these things contributed to the assassin's success. Before we get to the field test, let me share what my thoughts were as I heard the shot. Now, I was at the back of the crowd when the shot rang out. To me, it sounded like something small caliber or farther away. NBC is spinning the story that Charlie Kirk's assassin's alleged gun was powerful, vintage, and hard to trace. Former federal agents fear the potential for other would-be assassins to seek out widely available decades old firearms that require only basic proficiency to hit distant targets. According to the FBI, it was a decades old German-made rifle built for use by the military in both World Wars. So old, it may have been brought into the US before laws were enacted in the 1960s, requiring guns to be affixed with serial numbers or other marks to enable tracing. There are believed to be millions of such weapons in homes across America. Short of the security afforded to the president, there's no way to defend against the threat posed by this fear-mongering and cries for gun control at their finest. There's millions of these untraceable ghost guns across America. And unless you have Secret Service level security, anyone could take you out. Well, let's see about that. Again, I am not a military sniper, but I am working closely with an Army arms instructor who served in Iraq. I also have a similar skill set to the alleged shooter growing up around guns since I was 12 years old and going on hunting trips. So, can I dispel the narrative that anyone can take one of these guns off the wall and go shoot someone from 160 yards? So, I went back to UVU with my rangefinder. I determined that the exact yardage was about 160.7 yards. Obviously, this is a newer synthetic stock 3006 from Ruger. It is not a vintage rifle. It does have a serial number, but the technology is mostly unchanged and the cartridge has been around since 1906, hence the name 306. So, for my first shot here, I'm going to put the crosshairs right mid torso. This is right out of the box. Okay, I moved the camera a little closer. Crosshairs right on center of target. Did not hit. Now, let's take the shot again, knowing that the scope is zeroed at 100 yards, meaning I'm going to need to shoot above the target, above where I'm intending to hit. All right, that was a hit. All right, we got two hits on that one. Two confirms. Hang on. Let's go look at it. Should I have brought two cameras? Absolutely. Did I? Nope. We got a shot high and about mid torso. Okay, I've sighted into 160 yards. Essentially shooting in three round groups, adjusting the scope until I'm happy with where the crosshair is impacting consistently. Now the scope is sighted in at 160 yards. Let's put the crosshair on the mid torso and see how it does. Going to get serious on this one. Hat's going backwards. That's pretty much dead center. I'll send one or two more. Here's my final shot group after zeroing I think these two. In my opinion so far, this field test has proven not just anyone can take a rifle off of their grandparents wall, buy one from a sporting goods store that already has a scope mounted, put the crosshair on target, squeeze the trigger, and become an immediate assassin. There's at least a skill here to hit this shot from 160 yards. All right, while we're out here, let's test a few more things. First of all, let's see if this rifle can fit down the leg of my pants. Can I hobble around with this through a neighborhood like we saw the alleged shooter do for me. Honey, if you're watching, this is for science. You can hardly tell. I don't know how he got anywhere near campus walking like this, though. >> He's holding on to the backpack as he's jumping and landing with the backpack. Most of us would drop whatever heavy thing we have so that it makes the landing less painful, but he jumps with that backpack. Does that make you think that he did break the rifle down and that he did put it in the backpack? >> Uh, not necessarily. Um, with all the things going on in his mind, he's probably not thinking about what's the best way to land here. He's thinking about getting away. Now, if he did somehow get on campus walking like he had a peg leg, this is the biggest duffel bag I could find. doesn't exactly do a great job concealing it. I mean, it might hide the silhouette, but doesn't do a great job. We could just pretend this isn't a rifle barrel. Now, a lot of so-called gun experts said he was able to fold the rifle. Somehow, this is collapsible and easily taken down. Experts say you could definitely break this gun down easily. >> Collected a bolt action cuz this is typically the the choice for for a long range sniper. A boltaction uh looks like this. It has very few moving pieces. Could he break it down if he needed to break it down? >> A second or two. >> A second or two? >> What? >> This is why no one can trust news media. >> Literally just push a button and wrap it around. Push another. >> Okay, show me >> button. Wrap it back. Now, I'm no gunsmith, but that's about all I can do. You might be able to get the bolt out and detach the scope quickly, but that doesn't do anything about the length of the rifle. Did we really think he could break down a rifle like this in the matter of minutes it would take for him to escape that rooftop? Just to assemble it later to leave in the woods. To remove this barrel, you need a specialized tool. You need vice grips, not just a screwdriver. I made this video not to exploit a tragedy, but to provide more information about what actually happened to give evidence that this is not a simple shot, that is not the gun that is the issue here. It is the mentally unwell person that pulled the trigger. But for now, the biggest discrepancy I can see is did the shooter use a World War I antique rifle or the one in this picture? Cuz if it's the one in this picture, that looks like stainless steel and a synthetic or plastic stock. That's not World War I era. When we talk about the alleged rifle, there's two very different pictures painted. The first is this modern looking rifle that's made of plastic and stainless steel. This is not a World War I era mouser. This is not a takedown model that's easily disassembled. It cannot easily be hidden in a backpack or shoved down your pants leg. No photos or videos have been released showing Robinson holding this alleged murder weapon. So, which is it FBI? Is this the gun or was it a vintage rifle? FBI stated that the rifle used was an antique rifle that predated serialization. Serial numbers became a federal requirement after the JFK assassination. So, did he use one of these ghost guns so it wouldn't get traced back to him? Because the way to scare the left is by telling them that there's millions of ghost guns hanging up on the wall in your grandparents' house. In fact, the 306 was the preferred rifle of my father and my grandfather when we went hunting. What a wonderful narrative for our Second Amendment rights. The government's going to have to come into your home and check your guns for serial numbers. Even after that field test, there's a lot of things that don't add up. Why would the shooter disassemble the rifle only to reassemble it and then leave it in the woods near campus? Let's talk about the shooter's rifle. This is a boltaction 30 odd 6 scoped rifle. And contrary to gun experts online, no, this is not a foldable collapsible rifle. It is not easily taken apart. If we look at an AR-15 similar to the one that was used in Trump's assassination attempt, this rifle is easily broken down using one of its own bullets. By simply inserting the bullet, you can remove the pins from the upper and lower and be able to pack this gun into a backpack or bag. You can still see how significantly shorter the AR-15 would be compared to this rifle, even if the barrel was removed. And how did a 3006 round not completely penetrate Charlie? I wanted to do a quick size comparison. This is a 9 millimeter bullet. This is a pistol round. This is 5.56. This is the cartridge used in the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. And this is a 300 6. The 300 6 has more powder packed in, a bigger tip, and an expanding tip. This round is especially for hunting. Well, there's a theory by Paramount Tactical that Charlie is wearing t-shirt armor. The theory is Charlie was shot high chest and the round ricocheted off the top of the armor into his neck. The problem with the t-shirt armor theory is that's a 3A panel that's rated to stop pistol ammo, not a significantly heavier, faster moving rifle round. So, did it hit just the lip of the armor? Did a fragment hit Charlie? I'll leave that up to the FBI and for you to decide. Because if there's one thing we can learn from today's video, it's that you can't trust the FBI. If it wasn't for Tyler's friends and family coming forward, who knows if we ever would have found the shooter. And who knows if this guy is actually the shooter. But the answer to the question I really wanted to answer today is no. Not anyone can go and pick up one of these rifles off the wall, go and buy it at your local Shields or Bass Pro Shop already with a scope mounted and take a 160 yard shot. the shooter at least knew how to zero in his scope and adjust accordingly. I would say if you've ever successfully hunted small game, there's a high likelihood that you too could make this shot. Right now, we live in a world, a society where there's so much information out there, it's hard to know what to trust and what to believe. There's so much misinformation and malicious disinformation. I encourage you to draw your own conclusions. Don't trust the media at face value and exercise your god-given right to bear arms. If you want to pick up this freedom hat that says the great and legendary on the side, never surrender on the back, click the link in the description down below. All hat purchase proceeds are donated to TurningPoint USA. If you like the video, please consider subscribing for more. I'm Cameron Vance and I'll see you in the next

Link copied to clipboard!