Candace Owens Rejects Media Campaign Surrounding Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation and Erika Kirk Interviews

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Frank Turek Recalls Charlie Kirk's Final Moments and Confronts Three Months of Conspiracy Theories

Frank Turek Recalls Charlie Kirk's Final Moments and Confronts Three Months of Conspiracy Theories

15:00

Candace Owens Proven Right About Maroon Shirts at Charlie Kirk Assassination Event

Candace Owens Proven Right About Maroon Shirts at Charlie Kirk Assassination Event

8:36

Sam Parker Exposes Mikey McCoy's Strange Behavior After Charlie Kirk Shooting as Turning Point USA Launches Damage Control

Sam Parker Exposes Mikey McCoy's Strange Behavior After Charlie Kirk Shooting as Turning Point USA Launches Damage Control

1:30:23

Candace Owens Rejects Media Campaign Surrounding Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation and Erika Kirk Interviews

Candace Owens addresses what she describes as a coordinated PR campaign following the Charlie Kirk assassination, questioning the official narrative and mainstream media's treatment of those asking questions. She responds to recent interviews given by Erika Kirk to Bari Weiss and Glenn Beck, challenging the assertion that the facts are "very clear" and defending her right to investigate inconsistencies. Owens draws parallels between current pressure tactics and those used during COVID-19 and the BLM movement, arguing that emotional manipulation and appeals to authority are being deployed to silence legitimate inquiry into unresolved questions about September 10th.

December 12, 2025

Rejecting Emotional Manipulation and PR Campaigns

Candace Owens opens by acknowledging her frustration with what she perceives as an obvious psychological operation surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. She explains that the entire media apparatus and establishment appear to be joining hands to condemn people for having common sense and asking basic questions. Owens directly addresses the audience, asking if anyone genuinely believes the answer regarding who killed Charlie Kirk and what happened on September 10th is "very clear" as Erika Kirk has stated.

Owens describes the current situation as the "final stop" of a PR campaign where Erika Kirk is being brought out to signal to the public that her judgment cannot be questioned because she is a widow. Owens explicitly rejects this strategy, stating she rejects emotional manipulation and wants to give people permission to avoid the trap of thinking they must arrive at the same conclusions as Erika Kirk, especially when the story presented makes little sense.

Analyzing the Talking Points

Owens identifies what she sees as coordinated talking points being pushed by press members and influencers:

  • "There's a bigger mission at bay" - suggesting people should focus on larger issues
  • "It's going to ruin the trial" - claiming questions could damage the legal case
  • "This is an illness" - suggesting something is mentally wrong with those who question the narrative

She characterizes this as a badly run PR campaign because it is recognizable, noting that a good PR campaign should not be obvious. Owens respectfully requests that what she calls "agent Smiths in this obvious matrix" stop their campaign, which she says has been non-stop since Charlie was shot and was "dead on arrival" because people do not trust or believe it.

The Ballistics Question and Physical Impossibilities

Owens emphasizes that there is nothing that feels right about the Charlie Kirk assassination, particularly the claim that Charlie's neck stopped a 30-06 bullet. She stresses this would be unprecedented in human history and challenges anyone to present evidence of a 30-06 bullet being stopped by a human neck. She further points out that not only are they claiming the bullet was stopped, but that there was minimal damage to the front of Charlie's neck as well, describing it as having "cleanly went in and then ricocheted downward into his stomach."

Responding to Erika Kirk's Interview with Bari Weiss

Owens addresses Erika Kirk's upcoming interview with Bari Weiss, which is being termed a "town hall." She criticizes Weiss as "a Tel Aviv agent" and questions her rise to prominence despite what Owens characterizes as "sub average intelligence." Owens notes that the interview was pre-recorded from 11:00 to 4:00 p.m., with sources indicating multiple takes were needed because Weiss wanted to read from a prompter with pre-submitted questions.

In a clip from the interview, Weiss asks Erica what she wants to say to "the podcaster Candace Owens" who has been "peddling conspiracies" and "building her business off of these lies." Erica's response is simply: "Stop. That's it. That's all I have to say. Stop."

Owens responds by saying she can only honor that request if Erica is more explicit about what she has lied about. She acknowledges that it is plausible she has made mistakes but says she has reviewed her work and cannot find the lies. Instead, she presents a detailed list of what she characterizes as lies coming from Turning Point USA and others.

Documenting Contradictions and Unanswered Questions

Owens presents an extensive list of what she considers to be lies and inconsistencies from official sources:

  • Claims that Mikey had blood all over him (later said to be confusion)
  • Rob McCoy saying his son called him first and was a hero
  • Charlie's neck stopping a 30-06 bullet being described as a "modern-day Christian miracle"
  • Claims that Charlie never wavered in his support for Israel
  • Charlie being described as a "committed evangelical who only liked Catholic architecture"
  • Ben Shapiro saying they never had bad blood
  • Terryl Farnsworth being told by police to remove SD cards (Farnsworth personally told Owens this wasn't true)
  • Claims about when and how Tyler Robinson was arrested
  • Missing footage of Tyler Robinson turning himself in
  • The presence of Egyptian planes tracking Charlie and Erica at various events

Owens emphasizes these are not minor errors but significant contradictions that deserve answers. She argues that getting answers to these questions would not impact the legal case and challenges anyone to explain how transparency would ruin the trial.

The Glenn Beck Interview and Appeals to Authority

Owens analyzes Erika Kirk's interview with Glenn Beck, noting what she sees as another coordinated talking point: that people don't understand how the court system works and that social media commentary could taint the jury pool. Owens compares this to COVID-19 messaging where people were told they weren't educated enough about science to question official narratives and should "trust the experts."

She plays a clip where Erica expresses concern about social media impacting the trial, referencing the United Healthcare case. Erica states: "I want justice for my husband. Anytime we have leads, anytime we hear anything, we send it to the authorities. We're not messing around. None of us are involved in my husband's murder. None of us. Turning Point USA, myself, any of these other crazy accusations. None of us."

Owens rejects this framing, arguing it's the same pattern seen during COVID where concerns about censorship and suppression of questions were justified by appeals to expertise and the "greater good."

The "Higher Calling" and Legacy Arguments

In another clip from the Glenn Beck interview, Erica discusses not wanting to "waste time" going back and forth with critics and emphasizes Charlie's legacy should be about his work and mission, not his murder. She states: "My husband's legacy is not about his murder. My husband's legacy is what he left behind."

Owens firmly rejects this argument, stating that if the government is implicated in Charlie's death, then his legacy will be that "a person who gave all of himself to helping people get elected, all of himself to this political machine was ultimately killed by it." She argues this matters to people, which is why what feels like a "billion dollar campaign of propaganda" doesn't seem to be working.

Owens criticizes what she sees as emotional manipulation, comparing it to tactics used during the Parkland shooting where David Hogg's status as a survivor was used to shield him from legitimate questions. She argues that being a grieving widow does not make someone immune to questioning, especially when there are verifiable inconsistencies in the official narrative.

Calling Out Inauthenticity

Owens expresses frustration with what she perceives as rehearsed, inauthentic responses from Erika Kirk. She notes that the interviews feature pre-screened questions and prepared answers, which she finds problematic. Owens states she never asks for interview questions ahead of time because receiving them and preparing answers "feels fake."

She says what's missing is "passion, normal passion, not this chat GPT feeling" and expresses a desire for something that "feels anywhere where it feels authentic." Owens suggests that if Erica were genuinely investigating alongside authorities, she might express curiosity about odd details rather than dismissing all questions as conspiracy theories.

Owens describes the overall presentation as feeling "elite" - as if powerful, wealthy people are using their resources and connections to override common sense and public perception. She states: "It feels like we're so rich you don't have the right to think. The elites are here."

Tyler Robinson's First Court Appearance

Owens reports that Tyler Robinson made his first in-person court appearance, noting somewhat sarcastically that she's "happy to learn that Tyler Robinson is not AI." She observes that he appeared to be smiling and did not give the energy of someone worried about facing the death penalty. Nothing significant came out of the preliminary hearing, but Owens notes that media organizations are requesting transcripts and hoping for transparency as the case proceeds.

Addressing Allie Beth Stuckey's Criticism

Owens dedicates significant time to responding to Allie Beth Stuckey, who posted about what she called a "Kafka trap" - a rhetorical trick where someone's denial of an accusation proves their guilt. Stuckey compared Owens' approach to BLM tactics from 2020, suggesting that Owens claims anyone who pushes back must be part of a scop or getting paid.

Owens finds this comparison particularly ironic, noting that she was the one who exposed the truth about George Floyd and BLM in 2020 when the entire media and influencer class were pushing a false narrative. She argues that the lesson of 2020 was exactly that media and influencers can collude to suspend rational thinking using emotional arguments, which is what she sees happening now.

Owens criticizes Stuckey for what she characterizes as "mean girl" behavior hidden behind Bible verses and claims of biblical authority. She takes issue with Stuckey defending people who have been caught in verifiable lies - including Josh Hammer lying about Charlie's state of mind regarding Israel, Alex Clark misrepresenting Charlie's Catholic interests, and Ben Shapiro claiming he had no issues with Charlie.

Owens plays a clip where Stuckey defends these individuals and criticizes Owens for revealing old text messages between her and Charlie about Ben Shapiro, claiming the texts "made Charlie look bad" rather than Ben. Owens responds that the texts were from seven years ago when Charlie was coming up in the movement, and she only revealed them after being attacked and lied about first. She argues that allowing people to "grift after he dies by pretending they were friends with him" would be the real betrayal.

Standing Firm on Principles

Throughout the episode, Owens emphasizes that she's the same person who stood up to her own community during BLM, noting she's now standing up to the conservative community when the government appears involved in hiding facts. She draws parallels between the current situation and previous instances where she went against mainstream narratives that later proved false.

Owens stresses that her issue is not with Erika Kirk personally, but with the coordinated campaign to shut down legitimate questions. She states she's "always been swimming against the mainstream" and has "constantly felt like an alien" who doesn't understand why being fake is required. She indicates she "spiritually can't" go along with narratives that don't make sense, regardless of pressure.

In closing, Owens maintains that people are allowed to disagree with Erika Kirk and that viewers should not allow the current strategy to stop them from standing by their convictions. She emphasizes: "Don't allow this strategy to stop you from standing by your convictions. You are allowed to think what you think."

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!