Tucker Carlson Exposes How 100,000 Canadians Were Killed by Their Government Through Medical Assistance in Dying
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Tucker Carlson Reveals FBI Cover-Up of Thomas Crooks' Online Threats Before Trump Assassination Attempt in Butler Pennsylvania
34:24
Charlie Kirk Dismantles Transgender Ideology in Debate with College Student Claiming Male to Female Transition
21:56
Eric Metaxas and Dinesh D'Souza Expose Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens' Troubling Shift on Israel and Anti-Semitism
34:15
Tucker Carlson Exposes How 100,000 Canadians Were Killed by Their Government Through Medical Assistance in Dying
Tucker Carlson reveals the shocking truth about Canada's medical assistance in dying (MAID) program, which has resulted in over 100,000 deaths since 2016. He examines how the ancient Hippocratic Oath was rewritten after World War II, removing the prohibition against physicians taking life, and how this change enabled government-sanctioned euthanasia programs. Carlson argues that doctors now wield unprecedented power over life and death, with minimal oversight, and warns that what's happening in Canada could easily spread to the United States.
Among the most powerful groups in society today are physicians, healthcare workers, doctors, and nurses—people with needles who hold the power of life and death. This power exceeds that of any Delta Force member, FBI agent, or Capitol police officer, as medical professionals can determine whether someone lives or dies. This immense authority is inherent to their profession, which is why thoughtful, responsible societies have historically established structures to prevent abuse of this power.
For thousands of years, dating back to ancient Greece, the medical profession maintained strict ethical guidelines through the Hippocratic Oath. While many people believe the oath's most famous principle is "first do no harm"—a phrase that surprisingly doesn't appear in the original text—the actual ancient oath contained explicit prohibitions that reveal much about our current situation.
The Original Hippocratic Oath and Its Prohibitions
The authentic Hippocratic Oath, before it was rewritten in the post-war West, contained this crucial passage: "Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly, I will not give to a woman a medical instrument to cause abortion, but I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art."
Thousands of years ago, wise people understood that the power to kill resided inherently in doctors. They recognized that the temptation to kill—possibly at the request of the patient—would be ever-present. However, they understood that crossing that line would transform a doctor from a healer into a killer, fundamentally destroying the essence of medicine. You cannot go to a killer to be healed.
The Post-War Rewriting of Medical Ethics
These clear prohibitions proved too restrictive for the post-Nazi medical establishment of the 1940s, leading them to change the language. The new version of the Hippocratic Oath states: "It may also be within my power to take a life. This awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty."
This represents a fundamental shift from "you cannot kill people—your job is to heal them, even if they ask you to kill them" to "you can kill people, but remember you're only human as you do it." The question becomes: Is it possible to remember that you're only human while taking a human life? Probably not, because by definition, you assume a facsimile of god-like power as the destroyer of life.
This temptation—more powerful than sex or money—is the ultimate temptation: the ability to extinguish life. Society has granted this power to the entire medical class with virtually no oversight.
The Unpunished Nazi Physicians
After the widely discussed atrocities of the Nazi euthanasia program, very few of the physicians involved were punished. While some were executed, the overwhelming majority escaped justice. Some doctors who had killed children—admitting to starving them to death or injecting them with poison because they weren't smart enough or were in institutional care—not only avoided punishment but became prominent physicians in countries like Austria. They testified in court as experts and were regarded as authorities on medical ethics.
These physicians weren't punished because they function as a priest class, similar to the Aztecs or Incas in human sacrifice-based religions. Their role isn't to heal but to decide when people die, and that's where their power originates.
The Reality of Euthanasia at Scale
Many assume that euthanasia would only be sought by desperate people facing certain death—those with ALS, stage 4 pancreatic cancer, or other horrifying illnesses with no treatment options. At a certain point, patients know what's coming: grueling suffering that they can't fully imagine but deeply dread. This is the most human response possible.
However, the question becomes: Would government officials, physicians, and nurses be so unethical or morally ungrounded that they would allow relatively healthy people, depressed people, or people who could improve with treatment—treatment that's simply too expensive for the state to provide—to be killed?
Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying Program
The answer to this question doesn't require speculation, because state-sponsored killing of citizens has been in place for more than 10 years in Canada—the second largest country in the world, America's neighbor with the longest land border on Earth, and the most resource-dense nation relative to its population.
In Canada, the MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) program has been law since 2016, following a Supreme Court of Canada decision. In nearly 11 years, over 100,000 Canadians have been killed by their government. In a country with fewer than 40 million people, this has become a leading cause of death—one of the primary ways Canadians die.
This staggering number wasn't advertised by the government, which did much to keep it secret. The figure was unearthed by private researcher Kelsey Sharon, one of the few people in Canada paying attention to this issue. To put this in perspective: in a nation of fewer than 40 million people, 100,000 deaths in 10 years represents an enormous proportion of the population.
The Significance of Government-Sanctioned Killing
When assessing what matters in society, the fundamental question is: who lives and who dies? These are final decisions. To judge whether a country is thriving, we examine birth rate, life expectancy, suicide rate, and the number of citizens the government kills.
By these measures, there may be no darker country on Earth than Canada. Countries typically described as rogue, outlaw, run by religious extremists—whether Russia, North Korea, or Iran—none have killed 100,000 of their citizens in the last 10 years. Yet Canada has.
Most Canadians aren't even aware this happened, highlighting how significant information can be suppressed even in supposedly free societies. If you're trying to assess what's important, the choice between covering a pop star's wedding or the fact that 100,000 people were killed by their government is clear: what matters most is who lives and who dies.
Questions About Suffering and Design
It's worth considering: Why is there so much suffering in death? Why is there so much suffering in childbirth? This appears to be a matter of design. Not all animals suffer in childbirth or death to the degree humans do. People suffer on the way into life and on the way out.
Is there a reason for this? Is there a purpose behind the design? Is there something to learn from the experience of suffering? These questions aren't asked in a materialist society focused on avoiding pain and easily prescribing painkilling drugs. Previous civilizations thought deeply about these questions and reached very different conclusions. But in a society as shallow as a coffee stain, based on pain avoidance, no one entertains these fundamental questions about human existence.
