Washington Post Report on Tyler Robinson Reveals Chilling Details of Charlie Kirk Assassination
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
JP Sears Examines Death Penalty Charges Against Charlie Kirk's Alleged Killer Tyler James Robinson
17:14
Dr. Grande Analyzes the Assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in 2025
13:13
Brandon Tatum on Charlie Kirk's Murder: The Radical Left's Indoctrination Has Gone Too Far
22:38
Washington Post Report on Tyler Robinson Reveals Chilling Details of Charlie Kirk Assassination
The Washington Post published an extensive report on Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. The article details Robinson's silence with reporters, his relationship with a trans furry roommate, and the disturbing timeline leading up to the shooting, including texting Wordle scores just 60 minutes before allegedly pulling the trigger. Legal analysts Arthur Aidala, Matt Murphy, and Megan examine whether the Post's narrative attempts to obscure Robinson's apparent leftward shift in ideology, his anti-conservative sentiments, and the evidence pointing to a politically motivated murder. They discuss what evidence will be admissible in court, the challenges facing Robinson's defense team, and how the media's framing of Kirk as a "right-wing political activist" dehumanizes the victim.
Washington Post Report Attempts to Define Tyler Robinson's Politics
The Washington Post published a lengthy report on Tyler Robinson, the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk, that has raised questions about the media's attempt to shape the narrative around the shooter's political leanings. According to excerpts from the article, reporters have been calling Robinson since his incarceration, hoping to get some reaction or statement. Robinson has remained disciplined in his silence.
"I can't answer any questions," Robinson told Washington Post reporters. "You're welcome to talk." In four calls spanning about 40 minutes, he maintained that disciplined approach, listening silently as a reporter described what friends and acquaintances had said about him. He did not audibly react to hearing that Kirk's wife Erika had publicly forgiven him. He did not react in any notable way to the fact that Kirk had been awarded the Medal of Freedom. Eventually, Robinson asked that the reporters communicate with him only in writing. He did not respond to messages sent through the jail's email system, and his attorneys declined to answer questions for the report.
The Post's Narrative: Was Robinson Conservative or Liberal?
The Washington Post report appears to attempt to portray Robinson as not being a liberal but rather a conservative. The article gives lip service to statements from Robinson's mother that he had become much more enamored with pro-gay, pro-trans ideology in the year prior to the murder. The reporters mention this because it would be journalistic malpractice not to, and it's been alleged in the indictment. However, the piece then attempts to prove that he was really apolitical, with his friends saying they didn't really see any of that.
Yet the article does discuss Robinson holding his trans furry roommate, who was crying about all the hatred towards trans people, as Tyler Robinson stroked him and tried to make him feel better about all the hate that was out there. The report notes Robinson didn't like "hateful people." Robinson allegedly wrote in text messages right after the murder that he killed Charlie because Charlie was full of too much hate—"some hate can't be negotiated out."
The Post tries to downplay what Robinson wrote on the bullets, saying it was just a meme. But what they're really writing about is a guy who was kind of listlessly going through life. He dropped out of the Utah university he was attending—not Utah Valley University where Charlie was killed. He became a tradesman, learning the electrician trade, and was seen on site balling his fists up, walking around with his fists balled up to the point where his co-workers would ask, "Tyler, what's wrong with you?" He'd respond, "Oh, that's just something I do. I'm fine." But he would eat lunch alone. The only thing that ever animated him was guns that he would get really interested in.
Text Messages Reveal Anti-Conservative Views
There are text exchanges with Robinson's friends about the election and fake news around it. He thought Joe Biden might have been winning on the night of the 2020 election, but he wasn't sure. Here's one friend writing to him in the fall of 2020:
Friend: "I wish there was a simple solution against fake news, but there isn't. I have my own opinions, but that's it."
Robinson: "Pretty much see if there are any sources cited and check the accuracy. If really any of it's not true, then it's fake."
Friend: "I understand freedom of speech, and it's cool, but it makes it so media can lie about anything."
Robinson: "I wish at least like anti-vax wasn't protected under freedom of speech because it's speech that actively harms people."
This discussion about anti-vax messages doesn't really sound like a conservative perspective. After Trump was almost assassinated, Robinson sent a text that all of his friends said they thought was a joke: "Snowflake liberals can't shoot straight cuz they're too busy being gay." Of course, Robinson did appear to be gay himself—he was having sex with his male roommate who had declared himself female and was a furry.
Robinson's Relationship and Roommate's Political Views
The article points out that Robinson's roommate viewed Trump's election as a loss for trans rights and was distraught. More than once, a friend said he saw Robinson cradling his sobbing roommate in his arms. The roommate would erupt at friends who came to visit who would say things about boys and girls sports, shouting repeatedly to shut up as Robinson sat nearby on a couch. The group went quiet before their gaming eventually resumed.
The Chilling Timeline: Wordle to Murder in Under an Hour
The Washington Post details how Robinson did a Wordle puzzle right before Charlie's assassination. By the morning of September 10th, Robinson had made the drive north to Utah Valley University where Charlie was killed. According to prosecutors, he texted his Wordle score to his friend at 11:28 that morning. At 11:51, he allegedly walked onto campus and then made his way onto the roof of the building. In the courtyard below, a crowd had gathered to hear Charlie. At 12:23 p.m., it's remarkable—the Wordle score was texted to his friend at 11:28, and less than 60 minutes later, he shot Charlie.
According to prosecutors, at 12:23 p.m. came the crack of a single shot. As a student pressed Kirk on his views of transgender people and mass shootings, Kirk slumped backward. At 9:00 a.m. that very morning before the shooting, Robinson's friend in New England sent Robinson the friend's Wordle results. He'd gotten it in just two tries. Robinson replied 21 minutes later—it had taken him three. It was their last exchange. He's getting ready to shoot Charlie, and he's doing the Wordle. He's exchanging texts about the Wordle. Then he would shoot Charlie, and the bullets would include messages like "Hey fascist, catch."
Legal Analysts Discuss the Evidence and Media Narrative
All of this is interesting because clearly the shooter's friends are starting to speak out to the media in drips and drabs. There's an attempt by the media to try to divert the narrative away from the idea that he was a leftist. He may have been right-leaning for a period of time, much in the way that Thomas Crooks, who shot Trump, was a righty for a period of time but then had shifted notably leftward in the last year before. That also appears to have happened to Tyler Robinson.
Legal analyst Arthur Aidala discussed the human aspect of the case: "From a human point of view, it's relevant about how sick this guy is. Unfortunately, in society, we've lost the concept of what it's like to kill another person. The fact that you're playing a game, a word game, moments before you're about to kill anyone is just—it shows you how this guy either doesn't care. As a defense attorney, you want to talk about how sick he clearly was."
Aidala continued: "The fact that the politicians and the media are trying to figure out, 'Well, who's team was he on?' It's upsetting to me. Everyone on the planet Earth should condemn what happened. I haven't watched the video of Charlie getting killed because it's just too disturbing to me. But I have watched at this point hundreds, and I'm not exaggerating, of Charlie Kirk videos. And boy, oh boy, what a cool guy he was, and the way he conducted himself. And it's hard for me to believe that someone who believed in the same things that Charlie did, and Charlie was clearly on the conservative side of things, although I hate all of these labels, would execute him. So good luck to the media saying he was really a righty who's killing him."
Regarding the furry aspect, Aidala admitted confusion: "The whole trans thing is very confusing to me. You use this word furry. I don't really know what that means." The explanation provided was that furries are people who have anthropomorphic features—they want to be like half human, half animal, and they masquerade around in animal gear. They want to be treated like animals and make animal sounds. It's related to their sex lives as well, like a sexual fetish, and it is very closely linked with the trans community.
Aidala responded: "These are sick people. I mean, honestly, they're mentally—it's largely called a mental disease or defect. That's Arthur Aidala's opinion. If that's what you're thinking like how you should go through life the way you just described it, that's a mental disease or defect, and maybe his lawyers are going to try to put that kind of a defense forward."
Defense Strategy and Admissibility of Evidence
The discussion turned to whether any of this information would be relevant in court. Since the prosecution doesn't need to prove motive, and to the extent they do, it's written on the bullets and in Robinson's confession, would any of this come in?
Prosecutor Matt Murphy explained: "It is relevant. That it shows such a cavalier disregard. This can come in—they've got to attack mens rea. They've got to attack what he's thinking at the time he does it, which means they can either go with a voluntary manslaughter. He's so outraged by the things that Charlie Kirk is saying, and I'm with Arthur on this. If you watch his videos, he is center right. And he's trying to engage in the American art of debate, and he's trying to sway people with words, and he's respectful to everybody. So that is going to come back and hurt him. If I'm the prosecutor on that, that's a great fact, because that shows that he's cavalier when he's not angry, he's playing Wordle."
Murphy continued: "He's not so outraged at some position or something that Charlie Kirk said that they're going to be able to say, 'Hey, look, he is coming at this from a perspective where he's trying to defend the honor of his partner.' I think there are a lot of ways it can come in. It can also come in, and correct me if I'm wrong on this, Arthur, if you disagree, but if they try to go with some mental health defense on this, that's a big roadblock for the same reasons, right? Because he's cogent. And Wordle's tough, right? And if he's bragging about his Wordle score, that means his brain is working."
Aidala suggested an alternative defense strategy: "If I were a defense lawyer, I would say this is proof he didn't do it. Look how calm he is. He didn't do it. He wasn't there. I hope they run out of defense because it's so obvious when you go through the facts of this thing and the text messages that he wrote afterwards."
The Weapon and Media Framing
The murder weapon was Robinson's grandfather's gun, which is a 100-year-old Mauser rifle. When all the gun debate came in after this incident, as everybody loves to jump on it—like what's happening in Australia right now with Bondi Beach—people say they're going to solve this with more gun control. This is a type of rifle whose design is pretty much not trying to be controlled almost nowhere. It has no "evil features" like they call it in California. This is an ancient gun that is still totally effective because it's made of metal.
Going back to the Washington Post article, Megan noted: "The first line in the article is 'right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk.' And this is something that we've heard a lot in the media. When you go to a scene and I know Arthur's done a bunch of these too—when you actually go to a murder scene and you see a human being lying on the floor, they're a human being. 'Right-wing political activist,' the way that was written, it almost dehumanizes this man from the first line of the article. It alienates, you know, in the hot-blooded, divisive times that we're living in, it alienates all the readers on the other side, whatever that means."
Conclusion
The Washington Post report on Tyler Robinson reveals a complex picture of a troubled individual who appeared to shift leftward ideologically in the year before allegedly assassinating Charlie Kirk. Despite the Post's apparent attempt to portray Robinson as apolitical or even conservative, the evidence suggests otherwise—from his anti-conservative text messages to his relationship with a trans roommate to the messages written on the bullets. The chilling detail that Robinson was texting Wordle scores just an hour before the shooting demonstrates a cavalier disregard for human life that will likely be central to the prosecution's case. As the legal proceedings move forward, the question remains whether Robinson's defense will attempt to argue mental illness, mistaken identity, or some other strategy to combat the overwhelming evidence against him.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.