I came across this information. I was going to try to put it into a video, but I wanted to get it out in real time as fast as possible because the more information we have out there, the faster we can solve what actually happened to Charlie Kirk. How was this planned out? Who is actually behind it? So, I came across this um on Infowars with Alex Jones. I want you to we're going to listen to it and then I'm going to take you through people are posting more information that they're finding about what's happening behind the scenes. And this is actually shocking to know that book a book was published about his shooting the day before he died. And then also the LA Times and the New York Times reporting that he was shot September 9th, the day before he was shot. None of this makes any sense. Let's uh let me take you through it real real quick. >> Now, Grock confirmed this. I went and looked it up and confirmed it. I saw this uh last night and I wanted to wait and check. And a whole bunch of corporate publications a full day before Charlie was shot put out articles saying Charlie Kirk was shot and killed, but just the headline. And the people there were chanting and we have the audio. You hear the crowd, the noise, you there's all the witnesses they were saying. It's kind of like, you know, it's like the crazy man that stabbed the Ukrainian girl in the throat. You got to listen real carefully, but he says twice, I got that white girl. I got that white girl. But, you know, he's in a train, so you have to really listen carefully. But you can hear it in there. I don't know if it'll translate over AM radio out there. Probably would on FM, but it's all over X if you want to see it. And you know, the cheering. Yeah. Once it happens. Yeah. They're looking. Yeah. Yeah. H yeah. And and and so and I've got all the postings in the town by leftists and trans people that hey, he's getting liquidated tomorrow. He's getting dissolved tomorrow. Something big's going to happen. He's going to go bye-bye. And then there's this. And I'll I'll play that and show you the stuff in a moment. But look at this. Let's put this on screen from uh Amazon. Put the full screen up, please. The shooting of Charlie Kirk. Yeah. Blow that up. Why does Amazon have the shooting of Charlie Kirk by Anastasia J Casey posted one day before he was murdered and then they updated it and it's on the internet archive that's been checked. It it happened a day September 9th. So it was already out there and then they updated it today. Publication date, September 9th. Uh, the FBI needs to be knocking down some doors over there. >> Those who are seeing this all about Charlie Kirk, first of all, I am devastated. I am stressed. I hope he's okay. I was just googling this and something blew my mind. This just happened September 10th. If you look on Google right now 19 hours ago posted by New York Times and Los Angeles Times 19 hours ago saying Charlie Craig was shot 19 hours ago would have been September 9th. Today's the 10th. This doesn't make sense 19 hours ago. 19 hours ago today is the 10th. This doesn't this doesn't make sense. How could the New York Times and Los Angeles Times report 19 hours ago that he had been shot when this just happened September 10th? I'm going try to skip past the little intro music. Okay, here we go. Let's get to that. But is this crazy, guys? This is crazy. So, Amazon, this book was published by this person the day before he died. And then the New York Times and LA Times. I want to make this clear. Published. This has been fact checked. They've people have been crawling all through the internet, the metadata, all of it. They published that he was shot the day before the day. But before he was shot, this book was published and we have two major publications outlets reporting that he was shot. How is that possible? How is that possible? Then you see people that were cheering in the crowd. People saying that something big was going to happen. It was going to be the end of Charlie Kurt tomorrow. And they this was still just a lone gunman, guys. This was just some crazy person. Sure. He a crazy person was able to make that shot and all of this happened. Let's continue. >> Uh so do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years? too many. [Applause] >> I just want to pause it for a second. I want to make sure they're not going to actually show the actual shooting. Give me one second, guys. I'm just going to remove it for a second. I just want to make sure that doesn't show. Um, okay, it did. So, I'm glad I skipped that part. Let's add back to the stage. Here we go. >> Get down. Get down. Go. >> What the [ __ ] [Applause] >> Steven Crowder overnight. He published it about 7:00 a.m. this morning on X was given by law enforcement. ATFDHS there in known own internal report that they got the rifle the the shells in the magazine with all the different trans and anti-fasced just like they released the information within hours within 15 minutes of them being there to Kyle Sarapin FBI whistleblower they told him because we're concerned they're going to cover this up 100% this is a shooter and it And just like the Nashville shooter, it would take years to find out it was a trans person if it was left to the FBI old leadership. But they don't wait around now. They're sick of it. So that's good. We got good people more and more in there that have the courage to speak out and get the information out. I want to get to Trump's statement here, but but I want to show you something first. Okay. Now, Grock confirmed this. I went and looked it up and confirmed it. I saw this uh last night and I wanted to wait and check and a whole bunch of corporate publications a full day before Charlie was shot put out articles saying Charlie Kirk was shot and killed but just the headline and the people there were chanting and we have the audio you hear the crowd the noise you there's all the witnesses they were saying it's kind of like You know, it's like the crazy man that stabbed the Ukrainian girl in the throat. You got to listen real carefully, but he says twice, "I got that white girl. I got that white girl, but you know, he's in a train, so you have to really listen carefully." But you can hear it in there. I don't know. It'll translate over AM radio out there. Probably would on FM, but it's all over if you want to see it. And you know, the cheering. Yeah. Once it happens. Yeah. They're looking. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. and and and so and and I've got all the postings in the town by leftists and trans people that hey, he's getting liquidated tomorrow. He's getting dissolved tomorrow. Something big's going to happen. He's going to go bye-bye. And then there's this and I'll I'll play that and show you the stuff in a moment. But look at this. Let's put this on screen from uh Amazon. Put the full screen up, please. The shooting of Charlie Kirk. Yeah. Blow that up. Why does Amazon have the shooting of Charlie Kirk by Anastasia J Casey posted one day before he was murdered and then they updated it and it's on the internet archive that's been checked it it happened a day September 9th so it was already out there and then they updated it today publication date September 9th Uh, the FBI needs to be knocking down some doors over there. So, these people aren't playing games. And it was a big meme out there in a big we're going to kill Charlie Kirk. Now, guys, put that hashtag up that Rob told me about. There is a hashtag we'll show you in a moment. We'll just show the feed of it on X and elsewhere. RIP Bozo. And there's a lot of people countering it now with praise, but it's other people celebrating it. We're partying. It's a great thing. Light up them cigars. Rest in peace. You won't be missed. All right, y'all. Quick pause because if you're watching this, you're exactly the kind of person who's going to love what I've got in my store. We're talking Taste Like Liberal Tears mugs. We the people tease sexy and conservative shirts, even a Trump final boss drop. It's bold, unapologetic, and guaranteed to trigger every Democrat on your block. And the best part, every order helps me keep exposing the nonsense the left wants to hide. So head over to realmelanikking.com, grab a mug, grab a tea, grab something that makes a statement. The link is in the description box and the pin comment. You will help support the channel and join the movement. And also wear your values out loud. >> So yeah, just keep showing it. I mean, these are sick people. We'll show a compilation of them celebrating in a moment. But do you understand? Now, let's show this video. Here it is. The shooting of Charlie Kirk, a comprehensive account of the Utah Valley University attack and aftermath and America's response. These people have a time machine. September 9th, the Utah killing. And they're all there. He's dead. Something big tomorrow. No police on the roof. What the hell is this? [Applause] Now it gets worse. Key West just asked, "Why does Amazon have the shooting of Charlie Kirk by Anastasia Casey posted one day before? He was murdered." Now, this lady noticed, and people ask me, so I'm responding to them. Alex Jones, something for you to check out. Given this is right up your alley, and you have the resources to do so. Wall Street Apes posted this a little while ago. They're credible folks. We checked it, though. It's true. The New York Times and LA Times had articles published about Charlie Kirk being shot before he was actually was. That's how they reported three hours before they caught Oswald that it was Oswald in in the Asian papers because they got their times messed up. They report the WT7 was blown up an hour before it was blown up. Exactly how it was blown up. Wall Street apes posted this a little bit ago. The New York Times and LA Times had articles published about Charlie Kurt being shot before he actually was. Screenshots and video posted and Grock checked it and said it is accurate. Grock's findings at the end of the video. Here is the video. >> Those who are seeing this all about Charlie Kirk, first of all, I am devastated. I am stressed. I hope he's okay. I was just googling this and something blew my mind. This just happened September 10th. If you look on Google right now, 19 hours ago, posted by New York Times and Los Angeles Times, 19 hours ago saying Charlie Craig was shot. 19 hours ago would have been September 9th. Today's the 10th. This doesn't make sense. >> 19 hours ago. 19 hours ago. Today is the 10th. This doesn't This doesn't make sense. How could the New York Times and Los Angeles Times report 19 hours ago that he had been shot when this just happened September 10th? Am I Am I crazy? Am I crazy? Now, in a moment, we're going to play uh these would be hours long. We played them all, but just some of the celebrations and and these people are doctors and lawyers and nurses and school teachers mainly. It's a bunch of school teachers in Florida and New York, California, Texas, just like they celebrated when the girls that were white drowned in the floods. >> Okay. So, he's getting into like the celebration. I've done some compilations on that. I'll be reporting more on that. I may play more of that, but I want to keep the focus on this book being published on Amazon and then the New York Times and LA Times because if you just go search and Google, if you look at the mainstream media, no one is reporting this. You have to go on X to find some of this deep information that is being confirmed. Okay? So, this isn't like people just coming up with conspiracy theories, but people are checking the metadata. They're going deep into it. And you have hundreds of people researching this and you're not going to see this on any mainstream outlet. Why? Why? How could they possibly know anything about him being shot? So, what I want to show you now, let me um if you get into I'm going to make it bigger so we can see it. And some of you guys are saying I showed the shooting. Now, I took it out the moment right before he got shot. Then when I came back, it was like the immediate second after he was shot. You from what I saw, what I did, I did not. It was on my screen over here, but I made sure that you guys didn't see it. At least I thought that I did. Okay. So, in no way do I want to show that footage um at all. So, if it I don't know. I thought I did. If it accidentally show, obviously that was a mistake. I said I did not want to show it. So, it was just on Alex Jones uh live stream. So, um, so just getting a little bit more context here. Let's see if I can blow this up bigger. Uh, it doesn't always let me blow things up there. Okay, so this is what he's referring to. Can someone honestly explain to me how a book titled The Shooting of Charlie Kirk, a comprehensive account of the Utah Valley University aftermath, I mean university attack, the aftermath in America's response, was published on Amazon on a September 9th when the event took place on September 10th. So, here it is. It isn't the clearest shooting. They actually I believe they may have taken the listing down. I'll show you that in a second, but there it is. Clear as day. There's no way to backdate that and say it or do any of that. It was published onto Amazon that day. Now, I tried looking up who this person was, which I'll show you, but let's continue. Um, all right. So, this is actually this is a person that was saying, "Holy shite, this is true. This may be really small for you guys, but hopefully you can see it." So, this is really weird. Um, there's a couple books now about his shooting, but this is the first one. This is the Anastasia Casey. This is the the Kindle book. How Well, what does what doesn't make sense? Let's just say in a makebelieve world, we know it's outrageous that this was published the day before, but let's just say in a makebelieve world where they tried to change the date to um uh September 11th now. I think they tried to change it to to today that they published it. But how would you have enough information to write a whole book even the day he died? Like how how would that be possible? How would a person do that? Let alone, of course, the day before. But even the day of makes no sense. Even the day after, it makes no sense to have a whole book ready to go. Yes, it's a a ebook or a Kindle book, but still, how would you be able to do that that fast? Like the FBI doesn't even know all the details. New the news outlets were still reporting the information was coming in and yours is ready to go to be packaged and sold. Does that make sense to you? Not to me. I'm sorry. There is no explanation. This makes absolutely no sense. Um, so another person was screenshotting it. They the person saying, "I took this p this picture personally." Um, uh, and it looks like they took down the links to the actual to it and people are going into the web archives and looking this up. So, it is just it's just really crazy. So, I'm going to also show you guys this one. Um, so what I did was I just wanted to see who has any information, right? Like where can I find more information about this? So, this was the um original post that was about 4 hours ago and it was reported. Um, I'll give you guys another closeup because unless you're on X, you're not going to have access to these images. And I'm like in the way right there. Let me You can see it's the same title, but you see September 9th and then September 11th. Pretty crazy, right? All right. Cuz I just cuz some people say it's not true. It's a fake. Blah blah blah. Um, and I'm trying to get to the New York Times. Okay, so this person is saying Amazon requires 72 hours to approve and publish a book. Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University on September 10th. Yet, a book titled The Shooting of Charlie Kirk, a comprehensive account of the Utah Valley University attack, was already live on Amazon September 9th. How the hell does a book about Charlie Kirk shooting hit Amazon before the assassination uh even happened? This is even worse. They require 72 hours before a book can be published. So let's backdate that. So that's September 9th is when it was published. So we're going back to the 8th, the 7th, the 6th. Between the 7th and 6th, the 6th and 7th. September 6th and 7th, this book was uh uploaded to Amazon and then published the day before. I don't know if it was a mistake and they meant to like it was pre-planned is all part of it, but they it accidentally published publicly the day before, but they were trying to hold it off until the 9th or the 11th, but maybe the approval process once it triggered it and then it automatically pushed it out, then they tried to go back and delete it and change it and all of that now that we're all talking about it. So, and even like some people are saying, "Oh, it could be AI to put the book together and put it all together." Okay, that's fine. Explain the 72 hours before he died. How? And I don't care about AI. It still was published and put together before the man was shot. How would AI do that? How How would they do that on the sixth and seventh? Hm. Yeah, I'm sorry that none of that makes sense to me. Um, I'm going to put in the New York Times so we can uh people are talking about it. Okay, so this is it's a little bit it's not the best photo. I'll try to find one better. But here it is. This is a um so these are screenshots of people that pe that people have taken. I think that woman has and several other people showing that it was 19 hours ago. This was before this was the day before um he was shot that they were p they had published this information. The New York Times and the LA Times. So um yeah, so there's more pictures. Now this one I think is a little bit more clear. Here you go. So they put Charlie Kirk is apparently shot during Utah Valley University event. I am very confused. And I'm just trying to I'm just scrolling through to see if I can see anything else um about it because people are just now talking about it. Like I said, this person started talking about it um today, about 4 hours ago. So, the information is still coming out. Um all right. So, there's a lot of different things going on. Some of this is old. Okay. That is the gun that was used. There's just things that people from the New York Times were saying. Let's tr do the LA Times. Let me actually let me spell out New York Times because that may give me a better Okay, so this is the original video that Alex Jones played. I'll just go ahead and play it again because I know new people are coming in >> and something blew my mind. >> Hold on one second. Let me rewind it. I'm gonna make it bigger and >> Okay, so those who are seeing this all about Charlie Kirk, first of all, I am devastated. I'm stressed. I hope he's okay. I was just googling this and something blew my mind. This just happened September 10th. If you look on Google right now, 19 hours ago, posted by New York Times and Los Angeles Times, 19 hours ago, saying Charlie Craig was shot. 19 hours ago would have been September 9th. Today's the 10th. This doesn't make sense. >> 19 hours ago. 19 hours ago. >> Today is the 10th. This doesn't This doesn't make sense. How could the New York Times and Los Angeles Times report 19 hours ago that he had been shot when this just happened September 10th? Am I Am I crazy? Am I crazy? Okay, so it says the New York Times live updates page for Charlie Kirk shooting is dated September 10th, 2025 with content indicating real time um reporting after the event occurred that afternoon. diverse sources, all published after the incident with no mentions of backdating. The 16 hours ago in the image could um could be a search engine glitch or edited screenshot. I found no verifying evidence of pre-dating. So, meaning like it they're if they're going to backdate something or predate something, then it will be said in the article. They have to do that. So, they're not seeing anything that shows that. Um, also I don't think this woman who's mom of two on Tik Tok created fake screenshots who's live looking this up and so were several other people. So this was published um when she took these screenshots yesterday so you guys can see for yourself the evidence. Um, oh looks like New York Times also tried to change their what they um their title was. It says the New York Times changes headline on the Charlie Kirk obituary. The original version was so beyond the pel that you can only shake your head in disbelief. So the original is Charlie Kirk right-wing provocator and close ally of Trump dies at 31. Now the new one, Charlie Kirk, right-wing force and close Trump ally dies at 31. You see the nastiness that they started with? Right-wing provocator. What was provocative about him? In fact, in fact, I'm going to show you guys something. I'm going to show you this. The beginning of this, I want you to hear what this left-wing person says who came to debate Charlie Kirk. This is the last video that Charlie Kirk ever published on his YouTube channel. This is his last video. Take a listen to to this. Let me make this a little bit bigger for you guys. There we go. There we go. We're honored to be partnering with the Allen Jackson Ministries and today I want to point you to their podcast. It's called Culture and Christianity, the Allen Jackson Podcast. What makes it unique is Pastor Allen's biblical perspective. He takes the truth from the Bible and applies it to issues that we're facing today. Gender confusion, abortion, immigration, Doge, Trump, and the White House. issues in the church. He doesn't just discuss the problems. In every episode, he gives practical things we can do to make a difference. His guests have incredible expertise and powerful testimonies. Each episode will make you recognize the power of your faith and how God can use your life to impact our world today. The Culture and Christianity podcast is informative and encouraging. You can find it on YouTube, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Be sure to subscribe so you don't miss any episodes. Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring biblical truth back into our culture. You can find the Culture and Christianity podcast, sermons, and other thoughtprovoking teachings on our Pastor Allan's YouTube channel, Allen Jackson Ministries. [Music] >> A big crowd for California. [Music] >> All right, you guys know how it works. We're going to do questions for a couple hours here. If I really like your answer, you get a hat. We'll be signing hats as well. And uh God bless you guys. We're going to have a great time. Thank you. >> Okay. Hello. Yes. >> Hello. Uh my name is Yardo. I have a small YouTube channel. I'm a political commentator as well, much smaller than you are. Um I just wanted to thank everybody at Turning Point USAD for having this debate. And also I would thank the Turning Point uh USA San Diego State because they uh gave a voice to one of my dear friends who was a victim at the December or the October 7th um Nova Music Festival and his name is a Muzzai. Um I really appreciate that you guys did that and like you have my sincere gratitude. Um, I'd also like to um quickly state uh that this is a message for the far left first and then we'll get into what I highly disagree with you about. But um I just read Hassan Piker's New York Times article where he claims that he did not stifle free speech in his chat. I do not believe that's true because I was banned multiple times for having a simple disagreement with him. That is one thing on the right that you guys do far better is not creating echo chambers. And this is a a complete amazing thing you guys are doing right now. And I just want to let you know right now, Hassan [ __ ] I will donate $5,000 to Palestine if you debate me. Now, and I I 100% mean that and I will make sure that that is is public. >> Okay. So, what I wanted you to hear, if you missed it, what he said, he was thanking Charlie Kirk, thanking the right, saying that it's less of an ancho echo chamber and they allow diverse voices to speak out there. And that was a message to the far left because the far left doesn't do that. they are censored. Okay? Even if you are on the left, if you disagree with something about them that they say or anything like that, he's saying Hassan [ __ ] banned him or he was restricted. They they shut down free speech. There's there's supposed to be all about free speech. Obviously, we know that is not true because they demonize, shut you down, try to get you canled and killed if you don't agree with them, if you don't say everything you want them to say. So, I just want to play that little part again where he is actually saying, "Okay, someone there to debate Charlie Kirk, this man that they claim is so divisive, this man that is such a threat, this man that is so hateful that that you have someone thanking him who does not agree with him because they don't get that on the left. You aren't able to have open discussions on the left." Um, I'd also like to um quickly state uh that this is a message for the far left first and then we'll get into what I highly disagree with you about. But um I just read Hassan Piker's New York Times article where he claims that he did not stifle free speech in his chat. I do not believe that's true because I was banned multiple times for having a simple disagreement with him. That is one thing on the right that you guys do far better is not creating echo chambers. And this is a a complete amazing thing you guys are doing right now. And I just want to let you know right now, Hassan [ __ ] I will donate $5,000 to Palestine if you debate me. Now, >> okay. So, let's get back over to um this. I'm going make this bigger again. There we go. Uh let me see. So, this is again them calling him a right-wing provocator. more people are sharing the video of that woman, more screenshots of what had hap what you know these things coming out. So it's just um it's just very very weird. And in even the New York Times, they did an obituary about him just hours after he died and it said that he spread unsupported claims and outright lies. This is this is their obituary for Charlie Kirk who was assassinated. Right. This is some of the things they had to say. Um unsupported claims of he spread unsupported claims and outright lies. He said the drug um hydroxychloroquin hopefully I said I said that right was 100% effective in treating the virus which it is not. That Twitter that Twitter temporarily barred him in early March of 2020. But that move only added to his notoriety and seemed to support his claim that he was being muzzled by liberal elite. This is this is the this is what they've decided to do today. Not only publishing the day before that he that he died that he was shot. Somehow they knew magically. They must have had a magic eightball and they could see the future and they knew that he was going to get shot. So did the LA Times. So did this book on Amazon. This this person on Amazon. But they're out here writing this. And not only that, you saw the headline that they had to switch over uh right here where they called him a provocator. But you just saw from this left-wing person who was actually condemning the left, condemning someone who was very big on the left for censoring speech because they don't agree with, you know, something that someone else said that's on their side. and he's actually congratulating thanking the right for not being an echo chamber and allowing diverse voices to speak and to be challenged. How are you a provocator when he literally goes on the front lines every day front lines sitting there allowing people who disagree with him to come and argue their point to come prove him wrong. What they took advantage of that that he was willing to talk to people face to face. He was willing to have the conversations. He was not being divisive. He was trying to to have conversations, be civil in this country because everything has gotten out of control. And even coming to them in peace, even being peaceful, even coming to them and trying to listen and understand and debate, they still killed him. So when people talk about, you know, peaceful protests and we need to kumbaya and hold hands and it's, you know, the right is doing this and that and the other really they're going to events and and doing this to a man who literally was trying to reach out. So then what hope do we have if we are trying to have conversation or whatever? We're thinking we're not being provocative. We're not, you know, being hateful or angry. were trying to have a conversation with people and they will still kill you because they disagree. You're not allowed to have free speech. Like that's what I think makes this even more shocking. He wasn't out there like I hate everybody and everybody like making some crazy like he is talking to people one on- one. Those are the conversations we need in this country because that is the way we change things or at least we thought that would change things. Charlie Kirk thought that that would change things, but instead of it changing things, which it will, it still is going to change things. But instead of being grateful to have the conversation, being open to have the conversation, they would rather just kill you than than talk. But then they want to tell us about peaceful and and right shouldn't do this and they shouldn't do that. There are targets on conservatives backs right now. Because although Charlie Kirk was a political figure, he was not a politician. So they're actually they're taking out commentators, YouTubers, they're taking out everybody at this point. We don't know. And that may it may sound hyperbolic or I'm being a little scary over here, but this is the truth. And the fact the way that the left is celebrating this, I put together a compilation earlier today just showing them celebrating and excited talking about they want to buy the bullet a beer. They're praying for the bullet's family. Does the bullet have a GoFundMe? People are talking about they want to hide the the um the killer. They want to help him escape justice because we need more of that in this country. Then they are actually creating lists of more targets of right-wing people, people who are journalists, political figures. And I think now the move is not to go after the politicians, but to go to the influencers, the journalists, the people who don't have Secret Service, who don't have a level of protection, who just go to the grocery store with their kids, who are just living normal lives because they don't have the security. it's easier to get to us. It's easier to get to someone um that is not a politician but also has political influence. So, it makes sense. And I want to see who is supposed to take over the reigns at turning point because now that he was taken out, if we want to think about the bigger picture, was this a inside job? In fact, let me show you this really quickly. Um I cannot confirm this. This is all over X. I don't know if he is or not. I'm just going to show you the video and I want you of your own choice. Sorry. Sorry. This just got super big out of Let me show you. So you guys tell me, do you think that this was some type of hand signal? Because was this an inside job? Did they want to take Charlie Kirk out because maybe people didn't like a direction he was going, his messaging that was coming out? Do they want to install somebody new for the top of turning point so that they can steer the conversation and the youth in a certain certain way? I don't know. You tell me. >> Okay. Now, five is a lot, right? I'm going to give you some credit. Do you do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? >> Counting or not? >> Okay. I'm not going to I don't think it shows It doesn't show the shot. Okay. It's just showing the guy, but look what he does. Is it strange to do the baseball hat, touch the ear and then go back and then he is shot like what? Three to five seconds after that, maybe 5 seconds after this guy does the signal and then then the ear. Let's look at it again, guys. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm reading into things. Any military guys or anybody who familiar with the type of thing, let me know. >> It's five. Okay, now five is a lot, right? I'm going to give you give you some credit. Do you do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? >> Counting or not counting gang violence? >> Great. It's five. Okay. Now, five is a lot, right? I'm gonna give you give you some credit. Do you do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over >> that's a signal. Notice guys, notice there was no reason to for him to he just like it's like he just slightly moves the hat. There was nothing do and then he just touches the air real quick. I just don't I've never seen anybody do that unless they're they're throwing out signals. >> I wish I could slow this down. Let me see if this lets me uh do the playback speed. Let's do it really slow so we can actually see what's going on. You know, notice that he also Let me Sorry if you guys can see it. Notice that he also moves the phone over into a different direction. I don't know. Am I reading into it? You guys tell me. Um, oh, and thank you for my uh super chat here. Let me show this is uh West Virginia Wire. Thank you, my lady. Thank you for jumping on this case. Well, thank you for your super chat. I really appreciate that. Uh, but I am just, you know, I I really appreciate you guys and your support. Also, anybody who wants to be a moderator for when I go live, leave a comment in the chat that you would like to become a moderator. I'll go through everybody and then I'll approve certain people to become a moderator. I really appreciate it so we can keep any craziness out of the chat. It make it it look like the wild wild west right now because I don't go live that often. And so um so yeah, but one more time for those of you if you're not heavy on X or social media like that, you may not have seen this video. I just want to play it one more time and then uh we're going to get to the next thing. So I have muted it. So he's just randomly out the blue just a tiny lift of the hat. What? And then bringing up the ear then strategically moving the camera around. Someone says in baseball it means the play is on. Um um I'm just seeing 150 yards was the distance. Uh someone said 300 with a hunter rifle. So yeah, there's a lot that still needs to to be figured out. I see you guys with the moderation um comments. I will be once I'm done with this live, I will be adding in people to be moderators. So whenever I'm live and you happen to pop in, you will be a moderator for the channel. So let's go back. Um. Uh. Oh, Ilhan Omar. Oh, wow. Guys, uh Oh, >> someone. >> Here we go. >> What what I do know for sure is that, you know, Charlie was someone who once said, um, you know, guns save lives, um, after a a school shooting. Um, Charlie was someone who was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd uh in the hands of Minneapolis police. >> I think he called him a scumbag, >> right? Have no regard um downplay slavery and what black people have gone through in in this country uh by saying Jun should never exist. Um and and I think you know the the there are a lot of people who are out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate. complete rewriting of a complete rewriting of history. >> Yeah, there is nothing um more effed up, you know, like uh than to than to completely pretend that you know his words and actions um have not been recorded and and and in existence. This is a woman who has cheered on Sharia law which women in mass will be killed by their own family members if they don't if if they're actually raped. They will be killed for being raped like that. Like this is a woman who's talking about her top priority is her home country where she's actually from now. Suddenly she cares about foundational black American lives. Just because we are skin folk does not mean we are kinfolk. When has she ever advocated for black Americans and now she's upset about Junth and slavery comments and still using that to as a justifica justification as to why he was killed because see on the left words to them are violent. If they disagree with you then you have a target on your back. you should be taken out because your words, your disagreement, your ideas are are violence in their mind. That's how insane they are. And Medi Hassan is sitting up there just like, "Yeah, you know, he would that's a rewriting of history." I'm sorry. When did Charlie Kirk kill somebody or incite violence or tell people to kill each other or him himself did something to somebody? He makes no sense right here. He is literally I showed you the clip of someone on the left saying it's the left who is closed down who doesn't who shuts you down that there is no echo chamber on the right that they actually are willing to debate and listen and talk and have different ideas. Like I have so many videos on this disgusting woman and the things she's said and done. Please do not pretend because you have brown skin that you are a foundational foundational black American that you can speak about slavery. That is not your history. You don't own it. You have no voice in it. Okay. The same thing if you are a first generation American. If your lineage does not date back to his to slavery, do not speak for black people in America. In America, especially when you want to use it as a dog whistle or brownie points as to justification as to why Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Really? That's where we're at now? Complete poison. And now, oh, wow. Now it's saying Dave Portoy says Donald Trump played a huge part in Charlie Kirk's death. Uh, when I say Oh, wait. Let's play this now. This is shocking. >> Like politics definitely has a huge part in it. Trump. And and when I say Trump has a huge part in it, I don't necessarily mean he's to blame for it, but he's so divisive without really even just his face is like divisive. Like he just people hate him so much. And the left and the right, the rhetoric, especially to me, the left is insane. And it just boils boils boils boils. And this happened when Trump they they threatened when when his assassination attempt there's like a threehour period of like let's tone down the rhetoric and then they're right back to it. Politics definitely has a huge part in it. Trump and and when I say Trump has a huge part in it, I don't necessarily mean he's to blame for it, but I mean I just don't even think that conversation should be had. Like it is not Trump's fault by any stretch or I get it. I get what he's trying to say that to the left he is a divisive figure like Trump and anyone connected to him any ideas on the right but this can be said about every single person on the right like there is such a hatred such a deep hatred that if you don't agree with them even if you're on the left you will be cancelled. Kla Harris uh put out her book and she's going in on Biden now like like like Karen John Pierre, she switched on him. So the the left over there, it's like they're divisive on their own. They hate each other. They go after each other. Like Kla Harris in her book is talking about Joe Biden and how he's to blame and blah blah blah blah blah. I won't bore you with that in this video. We will get to it in another one. But yeah, if you don't know, she's going on her book book tour. I wonder if she feels protected. I wonder if a right-wing person would actually go there and do something like they did to Charlie Kirk. No, you're not seeing that. And I definitely do not advocate for that. We do not need to be assassinating anyone because that gives them that. First of all, it's wrong. It's morally wrong. I don't care how much you disagree with a person. Absolutely. Violence is never the answer. Um, and then it's also just going to give them more of like juice, like, "Oh, look, look, it's happening to us. The right-wing is just as violent." No, no, no. But she probably feels safe and secure cuz she knows that as she goes on this book tour, which Charlie Kirk was beginning his book his tour to college campuses yesterday when he was shot, it was his first date. And so when you when you think about this, when she goes on her tour again, she doesn't have Secret Service anymore, but she probably feels secure because you're not seeing people on the right doing these types of things. We don't need to shoot Klairers. We don't need to shoot these other figures. They shoot themselves every day in the foot. People have left the the Democrat party in droves and especially Gen Z. There is a 44 point swing from the Democrat party to the Republican party for Gen Z males. I am giving you that number correctly. 44 point swing. That is why they took out Charlie Kirk because too much of the youth was waking up and Gen Z by and large was moving over to the right. They're tired of the craziness. So they had to shut that down. They had to shut that down. Now, I know um Oh, man. Yeah, I'm not getting into anything about if certain people decided that this was going to happen or I know there is a lot of talk talk right now and I have to do more investigation before I put that out there of a foreign government. Okay, I think you know what I'm talking about. a foreign government was behind his assassination, which is a very real possibility. And I also want you to think about the distraction because guess what came out today? Um, let me I don't know if I'll be able to actually I'll put that on him really quickly. If you don't know this, Tucker Carlson, today uh let's see if he has um uh let me see share this. I don't know if he has it posted. He's just posted about he to posted about Charlie Kurt. I don't see it mentioned on here. Let me go to his actual page. But his documentary series comes out tonight on I mean today on 911. So, it was started today, 911. Today is 911. Um, if you guys don't know, my mother was in the Pentagon. Her office was hit by the plane, if it was a plane. I'm I have some things about 9/11 I want to talk about. Uh, yeah. So, it was her office was hit right on 911 and she ended up she was on the other side of the Pentagon during training that day. She was a civilian at the time. She was formerly Air Force, but she worked for the uh the Joint Chiefs. And she ended up having to cuz at the time cell phones were down. If you were in the DC area, there were no phone coverage and we were trying to call her and call her. She ended up calling us from a satellite phone in a helicopter with a four-star general. So that was a interesting take. Right now she would be outraged. Um, if you guys know she passed away in May, but this being the anniversary of 911, that was an anniversary that was very personal. This is a very personal anniversary for me because my mother could have died during that time. Um, and if you guys know, I grew up pretty much in the Pentagon. Uh, my mother worked there my my entire life. So, anyway, there's a lot more coming out. I just wanted I'm not seeing Tucker talk about that. He's uh that his his Oh, here it is. Here it is. Okay. Okay. So, if you go to Tucker Carlson, it says, "Watch the 911 Files premiering September 11th." Um, and I think he it's a fivepart series, which if you are subscribed to his um his his website or part a member, then you can get all five at once. But then the other ones, I think he's putting them out one at a time. Otherwise, you know, uh if you aren't part of his supporters or subscribed to his thing. So, anyway guys, I wanted to give you that information. I want to leave you off with that. If you guys didn't catch the beginning of this, we were talking about how the day before September 9th, Charlie Kirk was murdered, assassinated, a book on Amazon was published by a person with this name. I'll make it bigger. Um, a person was, look at this. Okay, so they says, "Who is Anastasia Casey?" The mysterious book titled The Shooting of Charlie Kirk raises questions. So, I'm not going to read through all of this, but you're not seeing mainstream media talk about this. This is the Hindustan the Hindustan Times, whatever this is. But mainstream is ignoring this completely. And you've got to wonder why. If the book was published the day before he died and the New York Times and LA Times reported him shot the day before he died, something's not right. But you guys let me know. Again, if you want to be a moderator, leave a comment on this chat. I will be checking those and approving people to be moderators for upcoming lives when we have breaking news coming in. Um, I appreciate you becoming a member. Thank you to uh Do Bordeaux forno. Oh, I like that. Do Boro Bordeaux forno. Thank you for becoming a member, guys. Now, I have got to get back on it. I have got to get back on it. A lot of videos to make, a lot of new information coming out. Um, I'll be deep diving into X. If you're not on social media like that to find this information out, don't worry. Your girl's got you. I will be bringing you more. So, make sure you subscribe and hit the notification bell because you definitely do not want to miss any of my updates. And I will see you guys very soon. [Music]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.