Zach Costello Questions FBI's Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative After Candace Owens Reveals Eyewitness Statement Contradicting Official Story

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Confronts Benjamin Netanyahu and Bill Ackman Over Charlie Kirk's Final Days and Hampton Meeting Pressure

Candace Owens Confronts Benjamin Netanyahu and Bill Ackman Over Charlie Kirk's Final Days and Hampton Meeting Pressure

1:09:54

Candace Owens Reveals Exclusive Footage of Tactical Military Crawl on Losee Center Rooftop During Charlie Kirk Assassination

Candace Owens Reveals Exclusive Footage of Tactical Military Crawl on Losee Center Rooftop During Charlie Kirk Assassination

56:12

Candace Owens Uncovers French Connection to Charlie Kirk Assassination and Brigitte Macron Investigation Cover-Up

Candace Owens Uncovers French Connection to Charlie Kirk Assassination and Brigitte Macron Investigation Cover-Up

55:28

Zach Costello Questions FBI's Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative After Candace Owens Reveals Eyewitness Statement Contradicting Official Story

Zach Costello examines explosive new evidence from an eyewitness who recorded video moments before Charlie Kirk was shot. Candace Owens tracked down the witness, who claims the shooter wore tactical gear, used a different weapon than the FBI recovered, and doesn't match Tyler Robinson's description. The witness, experienced with firearms, says he saw the shot fired from the front and immediately told campus officials they had the wrong suspect. Costello compares body cam footage with FBI images and questions whether the gun with engravings and the transgender narrative might be misdirection from what actually happened.

September 24, 2025

Eyewitness Account Contradicts FBI Timeline and Shooter Description

Candace Owens made a significant announcement that she successfully contacted and obtained a statement from the eyewitness who captured video of the Charlie Kirk assassin moments before the shooting. Owens verified the video's metadata and timestamp, confirming it was recorded to the minute right before Charlie was shot. The eyewitness statement directly contradicts what the FBI has publicly stated and challenges the theory that Charlie was shot from behind.

Zach Costello, a political commentator, states this new information aligns with intelligence he has received from numerous sources over the past 48 hours. Military members, hunters, and sniper rifle builders have submitted tips through his channels, and a common theme emerged throughout many of these communications that he initially dismissed until seeing what Candace published about the eyewitness statement. The gun and Tyler Robinson are now in question.

Campus Walkthrough Reveals Eyewitness Vantage Point

Political commentator and journalist Stephen Gardner conducted a walkthrough of the UVU campus and retraced the steps that the FBI claims Tyler Robinson took to access the roof. Gardner walked up the stairwell where cameras captured the initial screenshots released by the FBI. He then described the eyewitness vantage point.

According to Gardner's reconstruction, a student arriving late for the Charlie Kirk event zoomed in past the Spark Automotive building toward the Losi Center and saw somebody run across the roof. While it appeared to be the Spark Automotive building, there is actually a large green belt and sidewalk between the two buildings, meaning the individual was on the Losi building. As the student was arriving, he zoomed in and observed someone lying on that building.

The eyewitness video captures the moment, with voices noting someone on the roof and stating that the person had just run from one location to another. This footage would become central to understanding what actually happened.

Candace Owens Tracks Down and Interviews the Witness

Candace Owens spent considerable time tracking down the individual who recorded the video. She described the lengthy process of calling people and waiting for responses to piece together accurate information. What the witness told her completely contradicts the narrative the FBI has presented.

Owens is working to confirm the exact identity of this individual, but noted he was straightforward in his communication. The witness has extensive training and experience with guns, and helps train people in that capacity. He stated that the FBI's claim that the shooter dropped onto the roof at 12:15 didn't make sense to him. According to his observation, the earliest the individual ran across, set up, and took the shots was 12:22.

The witness sent Owens all the metadata from the footage he captured. The metadata begins at 12:22 and extends into 12:23, the exact minute that Charlie was shot. The witness confirmed he saw the shot and had stopped recording only about 20 seconds before the shot rang out.

Shooter Description Doesn't Match Tyler Robinson

The witness provided authorities with a description of what the shooter looked like, and it was not the description the world received less than 24 hours later of Tyler Robinson wearing jeans. When Owens asked if the shooter was wearing jeans, the witness said no. The person was dressed in tactical gear and wearing a face mask.

According to the witness, who has extensive experience with firearms, the person looked like a foreign agent. While he acknowledged he didn't know exactly how he reached that conclusion based on the person wearing all black, he was certain this person was skilled, knew exactly what he was doing, and was highly trained like a professional assassin.

Immediately after George Zinnn was arrested and that information started circulating, the witness ran to someone on campus and insisted they had the wrong person. He stated he observed the shooter with his own eyes and authorities had a completely wrong description. The person they should be looking for was wearing tactical gear and was obviously young because he watched him sprint back after taking the shot with his own two eyes. For unknown reasons, this description of a person wearing tactical gear never made its way out publicly. Instead, the public was left with the description of someone wearing a veterans shirt with an American flag and jeans.

The Gun Doesn't Match What the Witness Saw

The witness made another statement that had not been previously heard. He knows guns, and the gun the FBI found was not the gun he saw. The gun he observed was smaller. In a direct text message to Owens, protecting his identity, the witness stated:

"Watching the video of the impact, hearing the sharp crack instead of a big hunting rifle's boom and seeing what looked like a shorter rifle platform, albeit with the absence of the shape of a standard 30 round magaZinne. The assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round magaZinne only expecting to shoot once or twice. I would guess that he was shot with a Hornady VMAX or similar lightweight 223 bullet designed for very rapid expansion. Of course, I don't have access to any autopsy reports like you might, but if they found small shards of copper rather than one large copper coated lead slug, that's the gun and bullet I would expect was used."

Front Shot Theory Supported by Witness Account

Most significantly, this eyewitness claims to have seen the shot fired. This means Charlie was shot from the front and not the rear. Many individuals very familiar with guns have stated that this front shot, given the sound of the crack and lack of exit wound, must have fired a 223 or 22 caliber bullet.

Costello expressed disbelief when he saw the witness statement because so many sources have been saying the exact same thing. They have also stated almost unanimously that a 3006 rifle would have sounded different and left a massive exit wound.

Questions About Tyler Robinson as the Actual Shooter

Costello states he doesn't like how Candace or the witness used the term "foreign agent," considering it a big leap. However, this information calls into question both the rifle the FBI recovered with the engravings and Tyler Robinson as the actual shooter. Given this evidence and additional analysis, Costello has high levels of doubt that Tyler Robinson is the actual shooter.

Consistent with the eyewitness report, footage shows the shooter running across the roof and then jumping down. He is holding something in his hand, and it would align with this being a smaller gun than the one that belongs to Robinson. He is wearing dark clothes and has a backpack on, so laying down in the prone position on the roof could certainly make it look like he was wearing tactical gear.

The images provided by the FBI are not lining up for Costello. The public was given photos of the individual coming up the stairwell by the FBI, but it would be helpful to see the actual video to compare Tyler Robinson, his face and mannerisms, to the police body cam footage that Costello has spent hours analyZinng.

Side-by-Side Comparison Raises More Questions

Costello attempted to view Tyler Robinson from different angles, from the side and back, to see if he could match the profile provided. He created side-by-side comparisons to examine whether the person in the FBI images looks like the person in the body cam footage.

It's the lips and chin structure that Costello cannot reconcile. While acknowledging he may have been examining the footage for too long, he feels these are not the same person. He asks viewers to share their observations.

Implications If the Gun and Shooter Are in Question

If the gun is in question, then Robinson is in question. This has significant implications. It could mean the entire transgender engravings and anti-fascist narrative isn't true. That narrative could be a distraction, though from what remains unclear.

Costello has seen others claim that questioning these things is divisive and stains the memory of Charlie. However, he points out that Charlie himself, regarding Trump's assassination attempt, wanted to get to the bottom of every single detail. Costello believes Charlie would want the same thorough investigation if this happened to anyone else.

Costello argues that what is actually divisive is the narrative that left-wing rhetoric incited a violent transgender person to assassinate a conservative leader. He poses the question: what if Tyler Robinson's gun wasn't actually the gun used and he didn't take the shot?

Seeking Truth, Not Division

The conspiracies that many say shouldn't be discussed are simply attempts to tie up loose ends and get questions answered that haven't been addressed. Costello challenges the notion that honoring Charlie's legacy means being a sheep who believes everything the government says, asking how that approach has worked out over the past five years.

The investigation continues as more witnesses come forward and more questions emerge about what actually happened that day on the UVU campus.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!