Up Next
Candace Owens Confronts Benjamin Netanyahu and Bill Ackman Over Charlie Kirk's Final Days and Hampton Meeting Pressure
1:09:54
Candace Owens Reveals Exclusive Footage of Tactical Military Crawl on Losee Center Rooftop During Charlie Kirk Assassination
56:12
Candace Owens Uncovers French Connection to Charlie Kirk Assassination and Brigitte Macron Investigation Cover-Up
55:28
Zach Costello Questions FBI's Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative After Candace Owens Reveals Eyewitness Statement Contradicting Official Story
Zach Costello examines explosive new evidence from an eyewitness who recorded video moments before Charlie Kirk was shot. Candace Owens tracked down the witness, who claims the shooter wore tactical gear, used a different weapon than the FBI recovered, and doesn't match Tyler Robinson's description. The witness, experienced with firearms, says he saw the shot fired from the front and immediately told campus officials they had the wrong suspect. Costello compares body cam footage with FBI images and questions whether the gun with engravings and the transgender narrative might be misdirection from what actually happened.
Eyewitness Account Contradicts FBI Timeline and Shooter Description
Candace Owens made a significant announcement that she successfully contacted and obtained a statement from the eyewitness who captured video of the Charlie Kirk assassin moments before the shooting. Owens verified the video's metadata and timestamp, confirming it was recorded to the minute right before Charlie was shot. The eyewitness statement directly contradicts what the FBI has publicly stated and challenges the theory that Charlie was shot from behind.
Zach Costello, a political commentator, states this new information aligns with intelligence he has received from numerous sources over the past 48 hours. Military members, hunters, and sniper rifle builders have submitted tips through his channels, and a common theme emerged throughout many of these communications that he initially dismissed until seeing what Candace published about the eyewitness statement. The gun and Tyler Robinson are now in question.
Campus Walkthrough Reveals Eyewitness Vantage Point
Political commentator and journalist Stephen Gardner conducted a walkthrough of the UVU campus and retraced the steps that the FBI claims Tyler Robinson took to access the roof. Gardner walked up the stairwell where cameras captured the initial screenshots released by the FBI. He then described the eyewitness vantage point.
According to Gardner's reconstruction, a student arriving late for the Charlie Kirk event zoomed in past the Spark Automotive building toward the Losi Center and saw somebody run across the roof. While it appeared to be the Spark Automotive building, there is actually a large green belt and sidewalk between the two buildings, meaning the individual was on the Losi building. As the student was arriving, he zoomed in and observed someone lying on that building.
The eyewitness video captures the moment, with voices noting someone on the roof and stating that the person had just run from one location to another. This footage would become central to understanding what actually happened.
Candace Owens Tracks Down and Interviews the Witness
Candace Owens spent considerable time tracking down the individual who recorded the video. She described the lengthy process of calling people and waiting for responses to piece together accurate information. What the witness told her completely contradicts the narrative the FBI has presented.
Owens is working to confirm the exact identity of this individual, but noted he was straightforward in his communication. The witness has extensive training and experience with guns, and helps train people in that capacity. He stated that the FBI's claim that the shooter dropped onto the roof at 12:15 didn't make sense to him. According to his observation, the earliest the individual ran across, set up, and took the shots was 12:22.
The witness sent Owens all the metadata from the footage he captured. The metadata begins at 12:22 and extends into 12:23, the exact minute that Charlie was shot. The witness confirmed he saw the shot and had stopped recording only about 20 seconds before the shot rang out.
Shooter Description Doesn't Match Tyler Robinson
The witness provided authorities with a description of what the shooter looked like, and it was not the description the world received less than 24 hours later of Tyler Robinson wearing jeans. When Owens asked if the shooter was wearing jeans, the witness said no. The person was dressed in tactical gear and wearing a face mask.
According to the witness, who has extensive experience with firearms, the person looked like a foreign agent. While he acknowledged he didn't know exactly how he reached that conclusion based on the person wearing all black, he was certain this person was skilled, knew exactly what he was doing, and was highly trained like a professional assassin.
Immediately after George Zinnn was arrested and that information started circulating, the witness ran to someone on campus and insisted they had the wrong person. He stated he observed the shooter with his own eyes and authorities had a completely wrong description. The person they should be looking for was wearing tactical gear and was obviously young because he watched him sprint back after taking the shot with his own two eyes. For unknown reasons, this description of a person wearing tactical gear never made its way out publicly. Instead, the public was left with the description of someone wearing a veterans shirt with an American flag and jeans.
The Gun Doesn't Match What the Witness Saw
The witness made another statement that had not been previously heard. He knows guns, and the gun the FBI found was not the gun he saw. The gun he observed was smaller. In a direct text message to Owens, protecting his identity, the witness stated:
"Watching the video of the impact, hearing the sharp crack instead of a big hunting rifle's boom and seeing what looked like a shorter rifle platform, albeit with the absence of the shape of a standard 30 round magaZinne. The assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round magaZinne only expecting to shoot once or twice. I would guess that he was shot with a Hornady VMAX or similar lightweight 223 bullet designed for very rapid expansion. Of course, I don't have access to any autopsy reports like you might, but if they found small shards of copper rather than one large copper coated lead slug, that's the gun and bullet I would expect was used."
Front Shot Theory Supported by Witness Account
Most significantly, this eyewitness claims to have seen the shot fired. This means Charlie was shot from the front and not the rear. Many individuals very familiar with guns have stated that this front shot, given the sound of the crack and lack of exit wound, must have fired a 223 or 22 caliber bullet.
Costello expressed disbelief when he saw the witness statement because so many sources have been saying the exact same thing. They have also stated almost unanimously that a 3006 rifle would have sounded different and left a massive exit wound.
Questions About Tyler Robinson as the Actual Shooter
Costello states he doesn't like how Candace or the witness used the term "foreign agent," considering it a big leap. However, this information calls into question both the rifle the FBI recovered with the engravings and Tyler Robinson as the actual shooter. Given this evidence and additional analysis, Costello has high levels of doubt that Tyler Robinson is the actual shooter.
Consistent with the eyewitness report, footage shows the shooter running across the roof and then jumping down. He is holding something in his hand, and it would align with this being a smaller gun than the one that belongs to Robinson. He is wearing dark clothes and has a backpack on, so laying down in the prone position on the roof could certainly make it look like he was wearing tactical gear.
The images provided by the FBI are not lining up for Costello. The public was given photos of the individual coming up the stairwell by the FBI, but it would be helpful to see the actual video to compare Tyler Robinson, his face and mannerisms, to the police body cam footage that Costello has spent hours analyZinng.
Side-by-Side Comparison Raises More Questions
Costello attempted to view Tyler Robinson from different angles, from the side and back, to see if he could match the profile provided. He created side-by-side comparisons to examine whether the person in the FBI images looks like the person in the body cam footage.
It's the lips and chin structure that Costello cannot reconcile. While acknowledging he may have been examining the footage for too long, he feels these are not the same person. He asks viewers to share their observations.
Implications If the Gun and Shooter Are in Question
If the gun is in question, then Robinson is in question. This has significant implications. It could mean the entire transgender engravings and anti-fascist narrative isn't true. That narrative could be a distraction, though from what remains unclear.
Costello has seen others claim that questioning these things is divisive and stains the memory of Charlie. However, he points out that Charlie himself, regarding Trump's assassination attempt, wanted to get to the bottom of every single detail. Costello believes Charlie would want the same thorough investigation if this happened to anyone else.
Costello argues that what is actually divisive is the narrative that left-wing rhetoric incited a violent transgender person to assassinate a conservative leader. He poses the question: what if Tyler Robinson's gun wasn't actually the gun used and he didn't take the shot?
Seeking Truth, Not Division
The conspiracies that many say shouldn't be discussed are simply attempts to tie up loose ends and get questions answered that haven't been addressed. Costello challenges the notion that honoring Charlie's legacy means being a sheep who believes everything the government says, asking how that approach has worked out over the past five years.
The investigation continues as more witnesses come forward and more questions emerge about what actually happened that day on the UVU campus.
Video Transcript
Candace Owens in a stunning announcement
said that she was able to contact, speak
with, and get a statement from the
eyewitness who took this video of the
Charlie Kirk assassin right before he
took the shot. Candace verified the
video's metadata and its timestamp to
the minute right before Charlie was
shot. His statement contradicts what the
FBI has told us and the theory that
Charlie was shot from behind. I wanted
to get this video out as soon as
possible though because this lines up
with all of the intel that I have
received as well. Thanks to all of you
who have reached out and submitted tips,
especially you military members,
hunters, and sniper rifle builders. You
know who you are. A bunch have come in
over the past 48 hours, but there was a
common theme throughout many of the
comments that I receive that I began to
notice, and I dismissed them until I saw
what Candace published about the
eyewitness statement. It is the gun and
now Tyler Robinson that are now in
question. Let's get into it. I'm Zach
Costello.
Political commentator and journalist
Steven Gardner did a walkthrough of the
UVU campus and retraced the steps that
the FBI has told us that Tyler Robinson
allegedly took to get on the roof. He
walked up this stairwell, which you can
see the camera right there. This gave us
the initial camera screenshots that the
FBI released. And he then describes the
eyewitness view right here. Watch. So, a
student comes in late for the Charlie
Kirk event and he zooms in right here
past the Spark Automotive over to the
Los or the Losi Center and he sees
somebody run across the roof. It looks
like Spark Automotive, but there's
actually a big green belt and a sidewalk
in between the two buildings. So, he is
on the Los building. Uh, and as that
student was coming in, he zooms way in
and says, "Hey, there's somebody laying
there on that building." Now, here is
that eyewitness video that he's
referring to.
>> Right up.
>> Yeah. You think he'd already be in
place?
>> You would think that. So, there's
somebody on the roof right there.
>> Just saying.
>> He just ran from uh
>> over Where's my finger? Who from over
there? Ran in.
>> Now, he's right there. Just saying.
>> Okay. Now, Candace Owens tracked down
this individual. Listen here as she
describes what he told her about what
happened and then the statement that he
made in writing to her about what he
saw. This aligns with what many of you
are telling me via the tip line. I had a
conversation with that individual after
all this running around. Hence the
reason these episodes take so long to
put together because you're calling
people, you're waiting for responses.
and what he said to me completely
betrays the narrative of what the FBI
has put out. I am working to quadruple
confirm exactly who this individual is.
Uh but he was very much um and maybe
this is a poor way of saying it a
straight shooter said yes you know I
have training I um and I don't want to
give too many identifying details here
but this person himself has a lot of
experience with guns and knows guns and
um you know helps to train people in
that sort of a capacity and said that
they observed that individual the FBI
saying that the shooter dropped onto the
roof at 12:15. Didn't make sense to him.
He said earliest it was 12:22 that the
individual ran across, set up, took the
shots, and I said, "Well, you must have
been there." Because he then sends me um
the I I wanted to see all of the
metadata of when he took that footage.
And it the metadata begins at 12:22
and goes into 12:23, the very minute
that Charlie gets shot. And he says,
"Yeah, I saw the shot. I had just
stopped recording about 20 seconds
before the shot rang out. And he said
that he told them a description of what
the shooter looked like and it was not
the description that the entire world
received less than 24 hours later of
this person, Tyler Robinson, wearing
jeans. I said, "Was he wearing jeans?"
He said, "No, actually uh this person
was dressed in tactical gear and he was
wearing a face mask." And he said,
according to him, like I said, he has a
lot of experience with guns, that this
person looked to him like a foreign
agent. I don't I don't know if he's
wearing all black how he got that, but
he said there's no he was very certain
that this person was skilled, knew
exactly what he was doing, and was
highly trained, like a highly trained
assassin, so to speak. Okay. He then
says something else. As soon as George
Zin got arrested and that started
circulating, he ran to someone on campus
and said, "This is the wrong person. I
observed this person with my eyes. You
have the complete wrong description. The
person you're looking for is wearing
tactical gear and is obviously young
because I watched him sprint back after
taking the shot. I saw this with my own
two eyes." And for whatever reason, that
never made its way out that we can see
of a description of a person wearing
tactical gear. um were kind of left with
this idea that he was wearing the now
infamous um veterans shirt with the
American flag on it and some jeans. So,
he also said something that we had not
heard, which is that he knows guns and
the gun that the FBI found was not the
gun that he saw. That the gun that he
saw was smaller. And I'm going to read
you directly a text message that he sent
me again protecting his identity. Uh he
said, "Watching the video of the impact,
hearing the sharp crack instead of a big
hunting rifles boom and seeing what
looked like a shorter rifle platform,
albeit with the absence of the shape of
a standard 30 round magazine. The
assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round
magazine only expecting to shoot once or
twice. I would guess that he was shot
with a Hornady VMAX or similar
lightweight 223 bullet designed for very
rapid expansion. Of course, I don't have
access to any autopsy reports like you
might, but if they found small shards of
copper rather than one large copper
coated lead slug, that's the gun and
bullet I would expect was used.
>> First and foremost, this eyewitness
claims to have seen the shot. He saw it
fired. This means Charlie was shot from
the front and not the rear. As many of
you all have said who are very familiar
with guns, this front shot, given the
sound of the crack and lack of exit
wound, must have fired a 223 or 22
caliber bullet. When I saw his
statement, I couldn't believe it because
so many of you have been saying the
exact same thing. You've also said just
about unanimously that the 3006 rifle
would have sounded different and left a
massive exit wound. Now, what does this
mean? I don't like how Candace or this
guy used the term foreign agent. I think
that's a big leap. However, take a look
at this. Because this calls the rifle
that the FBI recovered with the
engravings and Tyler Robinson as the
actual shooter into question. Given this
and what I'm about to show you, I have
high levels of doubt that Tyler Robinson
is the actual shooter. Consistent with
the eyewitness report, the shooter runs
across the roof. And we have this
footage of him doing that and then
jumping down. He's holding something in
his hand, and it would align that this
is a smaller gun than the one that
belongs to Robinson. He is wearing dark
clothes. He has the backpack on, so
laying down in the prone position on the
roof could certainly make it look like
he was wearing tactical gear. But it's
these images here that are just not
lining up for me. We were given the
photos of the individual coming up the
stairwell by the FBI. It would be nice
to see that video so we can compare
Tyler Robinson, his face and mannerisms
to this police body cam footage that I
have now spent hours looking at and
analyzing. I was trying to see Tyler
Robinson from different angles from the
side and the back to see if I could
match the profile that was given to us.
Does this person look like this person?
I put these together for you so that we
could compare the side by sides. It's
the lips and the chin structure that I
just cannot get past. Look, I'm a
reasonable person. I really feel that
way. But I just feel like this is not
the same person. Maybe I've been looking
at this for too long. Let me know what
you guys think. But if the gun is in
question, Robinson is in question. And
that has very important implications.
That could mean could that the whole
transgender engravings and anti-fascist
narrative isn't true. That could be a
distraction from what? I don't know. But
I've seen others say that questioning
these things is divisive and it stains
the memory of Charlie. Like Charlie said
about Trump's assassination attempt, he
wanted to get to the bottom of every
single little detail. I think he'd want
the same here if it were anyone else
that this happened to. You know what's
divisive? The narrative that left-wing
rhetoric incited a violent trans
terrorist to assassinate a conservative
leader. What if Tyler Robinson's gun
wasn't actually the gun used and he
didn't take the shot? The conspiracies
that so many say shouldn't be talked
about are simply trying to tie up loose
ends and get questions answered that
haven't been. Does honoring Charlie's
legacy mean being a sheep who believes
everything the government tells us? No,
thank you. How has that worked out the
past 5 years? I'm Zach Costello.