Investigating the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Timeline Holes, Hunter Kozak's Jimmy Kimmel Connection, and George Zinn's Suspicious Actions

[00:00] It's no secret that no one is buying the

[00:02] mainstream narrative surrounding the

[00:04] Charlie Kirk situation.

[00:05] >> There's a lot of weird going on with

[00:08] this. I know

[00:08] >> cuz something is fishy here. Something

[00:11] is very fishy here.

[00:12] >> That doesn't look like the same person.

[00:14] Like ish.

[00:15] >> Breaking news, folks. Turns out Charlie

[00:17] Kirk had bones of steel strong enough to

[00:20] stop bullets.

[00:21] >> They said that he took it apart and then

[00:23] put it back together again.

[00:26] Shut the up. On the face of it, it seems

[00:29] cut and dry, but the more you peel back

[00:31] the layers of the onion, the stronger

[00:33] the stench. This case has a lot of what

[00:36] are the chances attached to it. What are

[00:38] the chances that Charlie Kirk was asked

[00:41] such an ironic question right before his

[00:43] life was taken? What are the chances

[00:45] that there were dozens of social media

[00:48] posts foreshadowing this days before the

[00:50] event? What are the chances that just 5

[00:53] days after this event, the university

[00:55] starts dismantling the crime scene and

[00:57] replacing everything while there is

[00:59] still an active investigation underway?

[01:02] What are the chances? When there are too

[01:04] many coincidences surrounding an event

[01:06] like this, it makes you wonder if there

[01:09] is a larger conspiracy at play. And the

[01:12] information that I have to show you guys

[01:14] in this video is going to have your jaws

[01:16] on the floor and you're going to be

[01:18] asking yourself, what are the chances?

[01:22] Hello everyone. If you're a new viewer,

[01:24] welcome. If you're a returning viewer,

[01:25] welcome back. If this is your second,

[01:27] third, or fourth time watching one of my

[01:28] videos and you are not yet subscribed,

[01:30] we already go together. Okay, make it

[01:32] official and hit that subscribe button.

[01:35] Today's video is sponsored by me. In

[01:38] case you haven't heard, I do have a

[01:39] merch line. All of my designs come in

[01:41] both men's and women's sizes. I have

[01:43] t-shirts, hoodies, cups, mugs,

[01:45] pillowcases, phone cases, stickers, and

[01:48] more. So, be sure to check it out. Now,

[01:50] let's talk about this whole Charlie Kirk

[01:52] situation. The deeper you go down the

[01:53] rabbit hole, the crazier it gets. I have

[01:56] seen episodes of Black Mirror that make

[01:58] more sense than this. There are three

[02:01] things that I want to focus on in this

[02:02] video, and all of them are going to make

[02:05] you rethink this whole situation. Number

[02:07] one, I want to address the official

[02:09] timeline because there are holes. Number

[02:11] two, I want to talk about Hunter Kak.

[02:13] He's the guy who was asking Charlie Kirk

[02:15] the question right before he was shot. I

[02:17] learned new information about him that I

[02:19] haven't seen anyone talk about, and it's

[02:21] pretty substantial information. And

[02:22] number three, I want to talk about

[02:24] George Zinn. I haven't talked about

[02:27] George Zinn up until now because I

[02:29] largely dismissed him as some old fart

[02:31] who's like cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. But I

[02:33] spent hours learning about this man and

[02:36] there is a lot of legitimate reason to

[02:38] be suspicious of him. I don't think it's

[02:39] a coincidence that he dropped his pants

[02:41] and created that huge distraction. He's

[02:43] not mentally insane. He's actually

[02:45] highly intelligent and it's weird that

[02:47] people are scrubbing information about

[02:50] him from the internet. But I did manage

[02:52] to find archived information about him

[02:54] and I want to talk about it. But first,

[02:56] let's start with topic number one, the

[02:57] timeline. On September 10, 2025, Tyler

[03:00] Robinson was captured on home

[03:02] surveillance walking towards the UVU

[03:04] campus at 8:07 a.m. And at that time, he

[03:07] was just yards away from the UVU campus.

[03:10] At 8:23 a.m., a gray Dodge Charger

[03:13] registered to Tyler Robinson is seen

[03:15] driving through a nearby residential

[03:17] area. And according to the FBI, at 8:29

[03:21] a.m., he arrived on campus.

[03:23] Investigators reviewed additional f

[03:26] video footage from UVU surveillance and

[03:28] identified Robinson arriving on UVU

[03:31] campus in a grade Dodge Challenger at

[03:33] approximately 8:29 a.m. on September

[03:36] 10th.

[03:37] >> Did I deliberately not edit out the part

[03:40] where the guy stutters because I wanted

[03:41] to be shady? No.

[03:43] >> Additional

[03:45] video footage.

[03:45] >> I guess it's hard to get the words out

[03:47] properly when you're talking I

[03:48] have questions about this. Okay. At 8:07

[03:51] a.m. he is walking to the campus and he

[03:55] is almost there. Then I suppose he walks

[03:58] away from the campus, walks back to his

[04:01] car that is parked in a nearby

[04:02] neighborhood, gets in his car and drives

[04:06] back to the campus.

[04:10] Why? Tyler Robinson went to great

[04:12] lengths to conceal his identity. So, why

[04:15] would he drive his vehicle to the campus

[04:18] where his license plate could be

[04:20] recorded? Furthermore, how did he do all

[04:22] of that in such a short amount of time?

[04:24] It's possible that these cameras have

[04:27] incorrect timestamps, but law

[04:28] enforcement hasn't said that. So, for

[04:31] now, I'm operating under the assumption

[04:33] that all of these cameras have the

[04:35] correct timestamps. So, the next time

[04:37] stamp that I have for him was 9:57 a.m.

[04:40] where once again, home surveillance

[04:42] catches him walking in the same

[04:44] residential area as before, close to the

[04:46] UVU campus. At 11:44 a.m., we once again

[04:50] see him walking to the campus, but this

[04:52] time he's wearing a black long sleeve

[04:54] shirt and dark pants. And we can see

[04:56] that he's limping, presumably because

[04:58] the gun is in his pants. And we see a

[05:00] vehicle slow down next to him, then

[05:03] drive off.

[05:10] I would like to know who was in that

[05:12] car. It's possible that they saw a young

[05:15] man walking down the street limping and

[05:17] they slowed down to see if he was okay

[05:19] and then they drove off. It's also

[05:21] possible that they knew him. It's also

[05:23] possible that it's just a coincidence,

[05:25] but this person got pretty close to him

[05:27] and potentially got a good look at his

[05:29] face. At 11:49 a.m., so 5 minutes later,

[05:32] Tyler Robinson is captured once again on

[05:35] surveillance footage walking towards UVU

[05:38] campus. Taylor Hansen did a great job

[05:40] recreating the route that Tyler Robinson

[05:43] took. Check it out.

[05:44] >> He is then once again captured on a

[05:46] security camera.

[05:51] You can see a lot of people have just

[05:52] recently walked this. The the grass is

[05:54] pushed forward, but this is the route

[05:55] that he takes. He then crosses this

[05:59] unstable bridge, nice and soggy.

[06:05] This is where one of the first initial

[06:07] images was released. He was right here

[06:08] in this position walking down the stairs

[06:10] in alignment with the wall. That's the

[06:12] camera that actually took that screen

[06:15] grab.

[06:16] We'll retrace his route. There's another

[06:18] one released right here.

[06:20] [Music]

[06:21] So, he went underneath this parking

[06:24] structure.

[06:27] So, he swings a right right here. He's

[06:30] keeping his head down. Obviously, he

[06:32] knows that there's a camera here.

[06:36] And right here

[06:38] is where those additional images were

[06:41] actually released from this security

[06:43] camera. And he's keeping his head down

[06:45] just like this. He walks up.

[06:49] So, after the tunnel in the staircase

[06:50] where he was caught on camera, he came

[06:52] out this way.

[06:58] Almost the entirety of this route has

[07:00] not had a single security camera. You

[07:02] walk straight out of these doors.

[07:09] And just like that,

[07:14] right there's where he laid

[07:16] ultimately took the shot that murdered

[07:18] Charlie Kirk.

[07:19] >> So that shows you how easy it was for

[07:21] him to access the roof. All he had to do

[07:23] was hop over the railing, run to the

[07:25] edge, lay down, and set up his rifle.

[07:28] But what's interesting is that the spot

[07:29] that he chose was very open. If anyone

[07:32] had come up those stairs, they would

[07:34] have seen him. If they just turned to

[07:35] the left, they would have seen him there

[07:37] setting up his rifle, setting up his

[07:38] shot. And I'm actually surprised that no

[07:42] one saw him because he was in such an

[07:44] open space. It's interesting. What are

[07:46] the chances? Something else that has

[07:48] surprised me, well, not really, but

[07:50] still, is the incompetence of the FBI.

[07:53] We were told this by the FBI.

[07:56] >> When he's first spotted on campus, he

[07:58] has different clothing on. And then he

[08:01] changes clothing on the roof and then

[08:04] changed back into that clothing at some

[08:06] point so that when when he was uh when

[08:08] he was apprehended, when he when he was

[08:10] arrested, um the clothing matched the

[08:12] clothing he had on before the shooting

[08:14] here at UB. So, he said that Tyler

[08:18] Robinson changed clothes on the roof.

[08:20] >> Wrong.

[08:21] >> We know that's not true because these

[08:23] still images from the surveillance

[08:24] footage that they released to the public

[08:26] show Tyler Robinson accessing the roof

[08:28] wearing that same outfit. We also see

[08:30] him walking down the street wearing that

[08:32] same outfit. So, it's not true that he

[08:34] changed clothes on the roof. And this is

[08:36] one of the biggest frustrations I have

[08:38] with this case. And it's the reason that

[08:40] so many people don't trust what we're

[08:43] being told because law enforcement just

[08:45] keeps contradicting themselves and

[08:47] saying things that are demonstrabably

[08:50] false. And these are the people who have

[08:52] way more access to the information than

[08:54] we do. In the charging document for

[08:57] Tyler Robinson, it says this. Police

[08:59] reviewed surveillance from the camera

[09:01] covering the roof and discovered that it

[09:03] recorded an individual dressed in dark

[09:05] clothing across the railing from the

[09:07] public walkway and dropped onto the roof

[09:09] at approximately 12:15 p.m. Although the

[09:13] individual moved out of the camera's

[09:14] view for a short time, the camera again

[09:17] captured the individual running across

[09:19] the roof and then low crawling to the

[09:21] area the UVU officer recognized as where

[09:24] the suspected sniper had dropped into a

[09:26] prone shooting position. After a short

[09:28] time, which matches the known time of

[09:30] the shot, the individual arose and ran

[09:32] across the roof to the northeast at

[09:35] 12:23 p.m., so 8 minutes after the

[09:37] shooter had accessed the roof, Charlie

[09:39] Kirk was hit. And we have this footage

[09:41] provided by the FBI, which shows the

[09:43] shooter running away at 12:23. And we

[09:46] see the shooter jump down from the roof

[09:48] and run away. And this footage raises

[09:51] many questions. The first question

[09:53] raised by the footage is why does it

[09:55] start when the shooter is running away?

[09:57] From this vantage point, we should be

[09:59] able to see the shooter access the roof,

[10:01] run across the roof, get down into a

[10:03] into a position, take his shot, and then

[10:06] run away. But for some reason, the FBI

[10:10] has not given us that footage. The other

[10:12] questions raised have to do with, shall

[10:14] we call them, anomalies in the footage.

[10:17] As the alleged shooter is running away,

[10:20] everything appears normal. We can see a

[10:22] shadow beneath his feet, but then all of

[10:24] a sudden his shadow miraculously

[10:25] disappears. We also see that this person

[10:28] in the background is walking and minding

[10:30] their own business and all of a sudden

[10:33] they just disappear. Did they enter the

[10:35] quantum realm? Did they just so happen

[10:37] to stop walking or change directions at

[10:39] that exact moment? Has the footage been

[10:42] doctorred? Or was the camera too low

[10:44] quality to accurately capture these

[10:46] events? Who knows? One thing that I've

[10:48] been waiting for is mobile ad data. Do

[10:51] you guys remember back when Trump was

[10:52] shot in Butler, Pennsylvania? The

[10:54] Heritage Foundation's oversight project

[10:56] had done mobile data analysis and found

[10:59] that someone had visited Thomas Matthew

[11:01] Crook's house in Pennsylvania and had

[11:03] also visited DC near an FBI office. And

[11:07] that raised a lot of suspicion. Well, I

[11:09] was kind of surprised that they didn't

[11:11] do the same thing in this instance. and

[11:13] I've been waiting for them to do it, but

[11:15] as far as I I know, they haven't done

[11:18] it, which may or may not be of interest,

[11:21] especially considering that one of their

[11:23] former employees was implicated in this

[11:25] investigation the day of the shooting.

[11:27] Do you remember how initially the police

[11:29] kept arresting people, then turning

[11:31] around and saying that they had the

[11:33] wrong guy? One of those individuals was

[11:35] Zachariah Careshi, and he used to work

[11:38] for the Heritage Foundation.

[11:39] Coincidentally, it was when I was

[11:41] looking into Zachariah Careshi that I

[11:44] accidentally stumbled upon a lead

[11:46] pertaining to Hunter Kak. The student

[11:49] questioning Kirk when he was shot is a

[11:51] 29-year-old Jewish math student. Some of

[11:53] his relatives own a security firm

[11:55] specializing in real-time crime

[11:57] prevention using AI plus video to

[11:59] prevent crimes before they happen. They

[12:01] were featured in Campus Safety magazine

[12:04] this year. So, this intrigued me. This

[12:06] was a very good lead. And truth be told,

[12:08] there's always been something that has

[12:10] seemed off in my opinion about Hunter

[12:12] Kak. Whenever he talks about what

[12:14] happened, he very much gives, "My dog

[12:17] stepped on a bee."

[12:18] >> In the words of a behavior analyst, his

[12:21] facial expressions and his words seem

[12:25] inongruent. Here's an example.

[12:27] >> Yours was the last question that Charlie

[12:29] Kirk ever heard.

[12:31] >> Yeah. I don't There's a strange amount

[12:34] of weight to that. I don't really know

[12:35] how to grapple with that. I mean, he's

[12:37] answered tens of thousands of questions,

[12:39] and mine just that was the first

[12:41] question I've ever asked him. We never

[12:43] talked before that.

[12:45] >> There's video of you in that moment.

[12:47] What was that moment like?

[12:49] >> I thought I heard a firecracker and um

[12:54] um I see his uh

[12:58] um I see the bullet hit his neck and um

[13:03] uh I fall to the ground. I I think I

[13:05] recognized immediately what this was.

[13:09] That this wasn't necessarily like a mass

[13:10] shooting. This was like an

[13:11] assassination.

[13:12] >> So, the gentleman sitting next to Hunter

[13:13] is fighting back tears the whole time.

[13:15] Meanwhile, Hunter seems to be attempting

[13:18] to portray false emotions, and it just

[13:21] doesn't sit right with me. And I'm just

[13:23] deeply suspicious of how ironic Hunter

[13:26] Kak's question was. And so, I did a

[13:28] background check on Hunter Kak, and I

[13:30] found a couple of his relatives. The

[13:32] first one that I found was a woman who I

[13:34] thought may be his mother, but I needed

[13:36] to confirm. So, I found her Facebook

[13:39] profile and I scrolled through the

[13:41] photos and I found pictures of Hunter

[13:43] and she referenced that he is her son.

[13:45] And so, I had confirmation that this

[13:47] woman is his mother. But from what I can

[13:49] tell, she doesn't work in IT or crime

[13:52] prevention. She works in real estate.

[13:54] So, no bueno. But I did see that she

[13:57] posted a picture of herself backstage at

[13:59] the Jimmy Kimmel show. Now, let's just

[14:01] pause for a second. Okay, you're

[14:02] probably wondering like, why am I

[14:03] bringing all of this up? What's the

[14:04] point that I'm trying to make? And I

[14:06] promise you, there's a point to what I'm

[14:07] going to say. When Charlie Kirk's life

[14:09] was taken, there were tons of people who

[14:12] said things that were insensitive. And

[14:14] the person who got the most heat out of

[14:17] everyone else was Jimmy Kimmel. This is

[14:20] what he said. We hit some new lows over

[14:22] the weekend with the MAGA gang

[14:24] desperately trying to characterize this

[14:27] kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as

[14:28] anything other than one of them and

[14:30] doing everything they can to score

[14:32] political points from it. In between the

[14:34] fingerpointing there was uh grieving on

[14:36] Friday. The White House flew the flags

[14:38] at half staff which got some criticism

[14:40] but on a human level you can see how

[14:43] hard the president is taking this.

[14:45] >> My condolences on the loss of your

[14:47] friend Charlie. I ask sir personally,

[14:49] how are you holding up over the last day

[14:51] and a half, sir? I think very good. And

[14:53] by the way, right there you see all the

[14:55] trucks. They've just started

[14:57] construction of the new ballroom for the

[14:58] White House, which is something they've

[15:01] been trying to get, as you know, for

[15:02] about 150 years. And it's going to be a

[15:05] beauty.

[15:06] >> Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief.

[15:09] Construction.

[15:12] Demolition.

[15:14] Construction.

[15:16] Now, Donald Trump's response to that

[15:17] question was trash. It lacked empathy

[15:20] and it deserved to be criticized. But

[15:23] after Jimmy Kimmel said what he said on

[15:25] his show, there was a tremendous amount

[15:27] of backlash and Jimmy Kimmel's show was

[15:30] suspended. Initially, we were told that

[15:32] it was suspended indefinitely and people

[15:35] rallied around Jimmy Kimmel, especially

[15:37] Hollywood celebrities, saying that

[15:38] cancelling his show was an attack on

[15:41] freedom of speech. And after being off

[15:43] air for about a week, Jimmy Kimmel's

[15:45] show returned and he apologized. But

[15:47] make no mistake, all of this was a huge

[15:50] deal. Jimmy Kimmel's name had been

[15:52] intertwined with Charlie Kirk's name in

[15:54] the headlines for days. Donald Trump got

[15:58] involved. People from the Trump

[15:59] administration got involved. There were

[16:01] talks about passing hate speech laws off

[16:03] of the back of what Jimmy Kimmel had

[16:05] said. Granted, there were other people

[16:07] who were saying things that were um

[16:10] offensive and insensitive, and people

[16:12] were upset about that, too. But Jimmy

[16:14] Kimmel, of all people, became the

[16:16] ultimate scapegoat. The whole media

[16:18] circus surrounded Jimmy Kimmel

[16:20] specifically. So, just keep all of that

[16:23] in mind. But let's go back to Hunter's

[16:25] mom. I'm scrolling through her social

[16:27] media, and the Jimmy Kimmel show just

[16:29] keeps popping up. And then I see a photo

[16:31] of her and her husband Steve Kak

[16:34] backstage at the Jimmy Kimmel show. Now

[16:37] that name has come up before at the

[16:41] Jimmy Kimmel show. Steve Kak.

[16:43] >> Anyway, we had one of these. We had a

[16:45] mandatory regularly scheduled all staff

[16:47] HR meeting on Zoom. They did it on Zoom.

[16:50] And this is the Zoom. And if you look

[16:51] closely, you can see GMO. Um, zoom in on

[16:54] that on the Zoom if you could pass. does

[16:58] sound asleep.

[17:00] >> So, Steve Kak works for Jimmy Kimmel.

[17:03] Steve Kak, the father of Hunter Kak, has

[17:07] been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years.

[17:10] What are the chances that Hunter Kak

[17:12] asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question

[17:15] right before Charlie Kirk's life is

[17:16] taken in front of a live audience full

[17:18] of thousands of people. Jimmy Kimmel

[17:20] then gets brought into this by the

[17:22] media, simultaneously dogpiling on him

[17:24] and making him the scapegoat because of

[17:26] his monologue. And then it turns out

[17:28] that one of the higherups at Jimmy

[17:30] Kimmel's show is the father of the last

[17:34] person to speak to Charlie Kirk.

[17:36] >> Yeah, that's

[17:38] >> that's weird. You can't make this

[17:40] up. Especially when you consider all of

[17:42] the other shady things that are going on

[17:44] with this case. It really makes you

[17:46] wonder. In terms of Hunter Kak having a

[17:50] relative that has an AI company that's

[17:53] doing crime prevention and all of that,

[17:55] I've not been able to substantiate that

[17:57] at this time. But this whole thing with

[17:59] his father is very interesting. Tell me

[18:01] what you guys think about it in the

[18:02] comment section down below. The last

[18:04] thing I want to touch on is George Zinn.

[18:06] Now, I want to clarify one thing about

[18:10] George Zinn. George Zinn has never said

[18:12] that he was in New York on September

[18:14] 11th. In the infamous video where he

[18:16] discusses 911, he very clearly says that

[18:20] he was in Denver when he heard the news

[18:24] about it.

[18:26] >> I was in Denver.

[18:27] >> So, I just wanted to clear that up

[18:28] because people keep repeating it and

[18:29] it's not true. But despite the fact that

[18:32] George Zinn wasn't actually there at

[18:34] ground zero on September 11th, he is

[18:37] still a very questionable character.

[18:39] >> And he only has these jobs where he's

[18:42] working for an ice cream shop or a candy

[18:46] store or a seasonal job here or there.

[18:50] He works for a Mormon LDS thrift store.

[18:54] He never actually has like any sort of a

[18:56] highpaying job. And yet this guy is

[18:58] known as the national convention guy.

[19:01] He's been to almost every single

[19:04] national presidential national

[19:05] convention, whether it's Republican or

[19:07] Democrat. We're talking Reagan, both

[19:10] Bushes, uh Donald Trump, Obama. He's

[19:13] been to inaugurations. He snuck his way

[19:15] into Ronald Reagan's funeral past Secret

[19:18] Service and he like brags about this.

[19:20] He's met every and knows almost every

[19:22] senator. He knows all the university

[19:24] presidents in Utah. He knows, which is

[19:27] interesting considering the Charlie Kirk

[19:28] assassination. He just knows. He just

[19:31] has a rolodex of people and he pops

[19:33] around between New York, Denver, DC,

[19:37] Utah, and all of these other places um

[19:40] around the country, which would be hard

[19:42] to do if you're just some guy that's

[19:45] working at a thrift shop, making bomb

[19:47] threats, periodically going to jail for

[19:49] terrorism, and getting out. and he also

[19:51] managed to attend Kobe Bryant's criminal

[19:53] trial back in 2003.

[19:56] >> Another George Zen story.

[19:58] >> Yeah.

[19:58] >> Um Kobe Bryant gets charged in Colorado.

[20:02] >> Oh,

[20:02] >> I'm reading ESPN online

[20:06] >> and here's a quote by George Zen of

[20:08] Utah.

[20:10] >> Did you make it into the trial?

[20:11] >> I did. I did. I went into a couple of

[20:13] them. Um I was just doing I I had a

[20:16] Greyhound layover and it we went through

[20:18] Eagle, Colorado. Where were you coming

[20:20] from?

[20:21] >> It was Eagle, Colorado. And uh I think I

[20:23] was coming from a Broncos game or

[20:24] something. I was doing something in

[20:25] Denver, you know, because uh I'm I'm all

[20:28] the time in Denver because anyway uh

[20:31] >> because because because why why are you

[20:33] all the time in Denver?

[20:33] >> No, I'm a Broncos fan.

[20:35] >> Okay.

[20:35] >> George Zen also ran for office in Utah.

[20:38] And this is what he wrote about his

[20:40] political involvement. Additional

[20:42] information about the candidate. I

[20:43] became enthralled with politics since

[20:45] childhood. When my dear mother was a

[20:48] pole worker for years and voting

[20:50] actually took place in our house on a

[20:52] podcast when he was asked what did his

[20:55] mother do for work, he said he didn't

[20:56] know.

[20:57] >> What did your mom do for a living?

[20:58] >> Um,

[21:00] she really was I didn't know too much

[21:03] about her before, you know, before I

[21:05] came into the family, but uh uh I knew

[21:08] she had some jobs, but she she just was

[21:11] basically a mom.

[21:12] >> How would you like to improve the party?

[21:14] I am deeply concerned at the direction

[21:16] our party is going both locally and

[21:19] nationally. The divisiveness and

[21:21] disunityity at every level is

[21:23] threatening our freedom and our

[21:24] sovereignty. As Ronald Reagan spoke so

[21:26] eloquently, "Government is the problem.

[21:29] The burden does not fall on our local or

[21:31] national party leaders. It rests with

[21:33] us." So that's what George wrote about

[21:35] himself back when he was running for

[21:36] office in Utah in 2019. based off of his

[21:39] little blurb, it seems as though he was

[21:40] not happy with the way the Republican

[21:43] party is going. And I just wonder, was

[21:45] that maybe a motive for him to

[21:47] participate in this political

[21:49] assassination? And something else that

[21:51] struck me as interesting was just how

[21:53] far George Zen traveled to attend that

[21:57] TPUSA event. There are two universities

[22:00] in Utah with similar names. There is

[22:02] Utah Valley University or UVU, which is

[22:06] where Charlie Kirk was the day that he

[22:08] died. And there is Utah State University

[22:11] or USU, which just so happens to be

[22:13] walking distance from where George Zinn

[22:16] lives. Now, these two universities are

[22:18] about 3 hours apart, which means that

[22:21] George Zinn traveled about 3 hours to be

[22:25] at UVU the day that Charlie Kirk was

[22:28] shot. Now, what's interesting about this

[22:30] is that Charlie Kirk was scheduled to be

[22:32] at USU on September 30th had he not been

[22:37] killed. In other words, it would have

[22:39] made sense for George to have attended

[22:42] the September 30th event because it was

[22:44] going to be held within walking distance

[22:46] of his home. Instead, he drove 3 hours

[22:50] to the event on September 10th where it

[22:53] just so happened that Charlie Kirk was

[22:55] shot. George Zen stands up, falsely

[22:58] claims to be the shooter, and creates a

[23:00] distraction. What a coincidence. Now,

[23:02] George is currently an inmate in Utah

[23:04] prison after he was arrested for falsely

[23:07] claiming to be the shooter. He was

[23:09] charged with felony obstruction of

[23:10] justice, misdemeanor trespassing, and

[23:13] the police say they found exploitation

[23:14] materials on his phone. So, he's being

[23:18] held without bail, which also means that

[23:20] now it's harder for people in the

[23:23] general public, such as myself, to try

[23:25] to reach out to him and interview him.

[23:26] Anyways, that is all I have for this

[23:29] video. If you liked it, please don't

[23:31] forget to hit the like button. If you

[23:33] are not yet subscribed, please don't

[23:34] forget to hit that subscribe button. If

[23:37] you would like to support my channel,

[23:38] you can do so by checking out my Patreon

[23:40] and subscribing. Or you can buy some

[23:43] merch. And if you are one of the people

[23:44] who have bought merch, please feel free

[23:46] to tag me on Instagram because I'd love

[23:48] to see it. If you like this video and

[23:50] you'd like to see more just like it, I

[23:52] will have two more videos for you guys

[23:53] in the end cards. I will see you in the

[23:55] next one. Take care. Bye.

[23:59] [Music]