so familiar that he knew exactly how to scale across the rooftops to duck down or in order to take an almost impossible shot at a Charlie Kirk who was sitting beneath a a tent. I'm told that it's because the feds told them that if they spoke out their lives could be at risk. You start going, I don't really trust these feds. Like I'm a little suspicious about the feds. Handis just exposed the FBI's Charlie Kirk assassination narrative, calling it a total lie. And in this clip, talking about some pieces of evidence she believes leads us in a very different direction, some of which was ascertained by parties close to Tyler Robinson. So, let's just get right into it. Please like the video and subscribe to the channel. Last week, I have to tell you, I was contacted by a source who I vetted with information that answered a lot of the lingering questions that we've had about the investigation. Not all of them, but some of them, some of the big ones. Uh, first and foremost, we were like, how exactly did it work? How did Tyler Robinson turn himself in, as we were told, but also never confessed? And did he actually author those absurd fed messages? this cuz I'm thinking no. Lastly, what was he doing at Dairy Queen doesn't really quite fit into our timeline. Also, don't expect this kid who just tried out being a stone cold killer to really have an appetite. And why exactly did the feds withhold that information at Dairy Queen? And why are they allegedly stalking the Dairy Queen to see who comes in and out? Uh well, we we have the story that could possibly potentially answer all of those questions and it certainly makes a lot more sense than the slop that the government is currently trying to feed us. >> Well, I have some problems with a lot of the inconsistencies that the government's trying to feed us, especially in relation to the gun disassembly and assembly narrative they originally went with. Then going back on that saying that he carried up the rifle to the roof, assembled it there and it would never got disassembled again. That was after saying, you know, it got disassembled and assembled and then disassembled or the other way around. But anyways, they changed their minds on that. The George thing, the George Zin thing piques my interest, too. The guy that was the decoy arrested and then claims I was only doing this to help the real killer escape. You know, he's saying this to the authorities. That doesn't require any kind of speculation whatsoever. But the Dairy Queen thing does actually fit into the general timeline. That was supposed to have taken place, I believe, 6:38 local time in Utah. And the shot rang out at 12:23 p.m. local time. According to the text messages, and you can say that they're bogus or whatever you want about the text messages, but this would fit into the timeline if he was waiting around trying to retrieve that gun as he told his roommate. and lover Lance Twig that he was hanging around there for hours uh around that time. It actually would fit in. Just one thing to note, >> first and foremost, Tyler Robinson has never confessed. They acknowledge that he has never confessed to this crime and he still uh is pleading innocence on the shooting. In fact, I was told that he was quote unquote bewildered by the idea that he carved casings. I should be clear, he does not dispute the fact that it is his gun at all. It is his gun, but Tyler is not exactly a gun enthusiast. He doesn't hunt like his other brothers do. In fact, he's apparently a fisherman. The reason that he has that gun in the first place is because it is in fact a custommade family heirloom. Tyler is the firstborn son, so he inherited. That's what firstborns do. They get the family heirloom. That is why he has the gun. As many of you guys have noted, the Robinson family appear to be conservative, hence the hunting and the fishing uh as the the sports of their choosing. I am told that they are fans of Charlie Kirk and they are fans of Donald Trump. Although this source noted that Tyler, like many other conservatives have um expressed wish that Trump would sometimes tone down his speech and his rhetoric. Now, on the topic of rhetoric, I am told that Tyler absolutely did not author those text messages. What text messages? He has no idea where these messages came from. Uh believes that they are therefore entirely fictionalized. It turns out, you're going to be shocked, that he doesn't actually use words like vehicle, uh, which should come as no surprise to anyone that has a brain, by the way. Um, I don't know if that would come to a s surprise to anyone that does or does not have a brain. I think both people that do or do not have a brain might think different ways on that. And if you're saying that someone that says the word car doesn't necessarily use the word vehicle, I think that's a stretch potentially. And as far as the text messages, we talked about it before in other videos, but I'm going to put it here, too. If you're saying that the feds fabricated these text messages, this guy is going to walk because the defense is going to have subpoena power, be able to get to his provider and see if they match. Furthermore, Lance Twig is not disputing the text messages and he is a party to the text messages. So, you'd think that this lover, and by all indications that they were close, they they weren't at each other's throats. They had a close relationship, it seemed from the information we have, would want to vindicate, you know, the arrest of his friend by saying no, that this is totally wrong. So, this is going to make this guy walk if they can really show that the feds are fabricating a narrative here. And then that disposes with the the idea that Tyler is a psy, which you can't have a pathy if you're willing to sabotage your case over fabricated text messages as a prosecutor. And don't get me wrong, the government's blatantly violating our basic rights in every imaginable way. I hold nothing, you know, against that. I h have no reservations in calling them out for that. I don't even think the FBI should exist. But you also have to demonstrate why this wouldn't just completely jeopardize the case. This is not something that's just a technical difficulty. This is something that would make him walk. >> I'm sure you caught this, but um there's old footage of Tyler Robinson that is now circulating from a car accident that he had. Uh, and during the discussion with the officer that showed up, Tyler certainly refers to it as his car, not his vehicle, because that's how most Americans, how most English speakers refer to a car, unless they're in the military or on the police force. So, here is 2022 police body cam footage, in case you missed that, of Tyler making a crash report. Take a listen. >> Your mom's on her way. >> Yeah, she's got to be a minute. She's got to shuttle over from where she was at to her car and then drive over. >> Gotcha. >> His mother was going to shuttle over from her car. H interesting. There's more, of course. >> Yeah. Again, I this doesn't dispose of the idea that you could use both car or vehicle in the same context, but in different conversations, if that's the word that crosses your mind first. I'm not saying that's always the case. I'm not saying that it's impossible that, you know, you'd only use one of the two, but it seems highly likely. And furthermore, just from that clip, I'm not so sure that there's that many people that use the phrase shuttle over when talking about, you know, their relatives coming to a different location. That would seem abnormal. If you're trying to cast doubt on something, too. You could use it in the same way. You know, driving over, using that instead. Everyone would just say driving over. Well, no. I think a lot of people might use both. You know, I'm not a 22-year-old gay dude like this guy, but I would use both. And I'm sure that I'm not alone in that respect. So I I'm not sure that this is too compelling one way or the other. I'm not saying that it destroys the Fed's narrative or that it doesn't destroy the Fed's narrative. I'm just saying that I don't know about this avenue if no party close to this defendant is saying that his text messages aren't fabricated. And maybe there the defense is holding this close to their vest and they're going to unveil that when it comes closer to court if this goes to trial. But, you know, whether or not it goes to trial, the defense is going to have subpoena power. Again, even if this guy is off, they can have subpoena power to clear his name. >> Of most interest to me, what I've learned is that his father uh does not believe his parents don't believe that their son committed this crime. I was like, "Huh? Excuse me. That's a that's a far cry from what the media has been telling us." Remember, the media presented this amazing story. Uh the father realized his son was guilty. So it goes, right? And then he phoned over a friend to help him convince his son to turn himself in because this guy, you know, this this mysterious guy was a friend and and just had a connection with Tyler. >> Yeah, it's that's not exactly right. That is the truth. And often they're handinand that media and the government act in collaborative schemes often to deprive us of our rights. But in this regard, it actually was the government's narrative in the indictment doc that said this for the first time about this being the case where Robinson's mother thought that it looked like him on the footage that the feds were circulating and the father agreed with that and from there they you know talked to him and then eventually invited that friend over. So again, I'm not saying that the feds have to be innately trusted here quite to the contrary. I'm saying if they're lying about this and this is what they put out to the public, this can be raised by the defense at trial saying, you know, no, this was totally misleading. But again, I don't think you're hearing that directly from any party close to him yet and Lance Twig, who's been often quiet, too. So have the parents. So for all I know, I mean, this could be true that they're going to dispute this, but it's not the media. This was written by the government before the media reported on it. >> And eventually they said, "You got to do the right thing here. we know this is you. That was the vibe. Certainly that's what the media was putting down for us to pick up. Well, I was told actually that it was kind of the opposite. That quote unquote family friend uh who we learned was a former detective with the police force um at least and so therefore has strong ties with the police station informed the family. It was that in between person that informed the family that Tyler had been identified as the shooter. He recognized him. He knows Tyler. He gives them the heads up. And then I'm told, and I believe this, that the way in which he got arrested, or rather turned himself in, was because that family friend slash neighbor slmer detective told him, "Hey, it's best for you to turn yourself in because there's only one of two options here. either you turn yourself in and everything is peaceable or you know the SWAT team could come in here and arrest you and things could get crazy. So that's what happened. He went over to their house. Tyler was called over. Tyler was bewildered. He disputed the idea that he had murdered Charlie Kirk. In fact, according uh to my source, Tyler has never even stepped foot on UVU campus. Tyler, it turns out, has which has already been revealed, um, was accepted into Utah State University, not Utah Valley. And that's actually interesting if you pause and reflect on that because we didn't really consider how on earth Tyler became not just familiar with the layout of the campus, but familiar with the rooftop layout of UVU campus. so familiar that he knew exactly how to scale across the rooftops to duck down or in order to take an almost impossible shot at a Charlie Kirk who was sitting beneath a a tent. How did he know how to do all of that? Had he been there before? >> Yeah, I mean that's a that's a good question. I think this is a legitimate question raised by Candace. It's possible that he scoped it out before. We don't know. The feds haven't been forthcoming about everything they have on this guy, including, you know, full video of some of the the clipped photographs that we've seen, but I took a little bit of look at this and on the university site, there is a facilities master plan that you can look at. It doesn't have super close, you know, schematics level by level about each of the facilities, each of the buildings. But this information, some of it is available. It also says that you can contact facilities management for actually building plans. So, it looks like they make it available. It says they're not typically made publicly for security and privacy reasons, but they are available, it sounds like, to interested parties if you do an AI overview, presumably that's being drawn from the website. So, just something to note. The other thing that Candace said about, you know, the family friend kind of playing a bigger role in pointing out Tyler as the possible shooter rather than his parents first being upstream of that. Well, again, that disposes of the narrative that they have in this information that went out to the public that said that Robinson explained not only that he did it, but why he did it. He thought that there was too much evil and the guy spreads too much hate. That's what the feds said. And again, if the feds printed this, the defense is going to make this guy walk if they can find in trial that this is totally wrong and have a convincing and compelling narrative to the contrary where this was all planted to try to take this guy down. There's just too many things here that make it seem like if the feds, you know, want to make this guy go away forever, they couldn't like just fabricate all this and that this guy would just walk if that was true. And that disposes of the pathy narrative if you believe that. But you know, this is just my comments. I've been called controlled opposition because I don't have reason to believe Erica Kirk killed Charlie Kirk. I've been called controlled opposition because I don't have believe reason to believe that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. I've been called controlled opposition because I don't believe that Lance Twig killed Charlie Kirk. No matter what you think, that's what I'm going to be told. But this is just my take based on reason and applying it to this case. that he he knew where Charlie was going to be sitting in it, that he would have that shot from on top of the Lozy Center. What? Right. I would actually and I I don't know, but I would imagine that even actual current UVU students don't know that possibility. Like, they're not even that familiar with how to scale the rooftops and what shots they can take from it. >> Agreed. I don't think the average student would would do that. If you were interesting in murdering Charlie Kirk, perhaps you do some research and and you know, make some preparations before that happened. I have no reason to believe that that's what Tyler Robinson did without more information. But, you know, typical students don't, you know, maul the possibility of gunning down an influencer they don't exactly like or think is spreading hate. But this is a fair point. You know, we should ask questions about this. >> We'll see. Uh, curiously, however, my source says that Tyler Robinson was nearby the campus on that day. I'm wondering if that fact, which I'm trying to learn more information regarding, explains the Dairy Queen photo because what was he doing around the campus on that day? Where exactly was he around the campus on that day? This photo never made any sense. when I plugged it into my timeline, it wasn't fitting in. >> I don't understand that. I would like her to show why that doesn't fit in. I've seen her timeline in previous episodes and she has it like in a word doc and I think she's done a good job at constructing it. But this is supposedly at 638 and he supposedly was hanging around for a long time around that campus, you know, with the possibility of trying to get that firearm back. That was what he was talking about in those texts to Lance Twig. But I I don't know what she's trying to say if it doesn't fit into the timeline. Is she saying that she believes that, you know, this was this was too much later than it took for him to get home? I I would need to know more about why she thinks it doesn't fit into the timeline to really have a strong opinion, but to me, it seems to fit generally. I'm not saying that means he was there for sure. This picture was accurate. He it was definitely him. I don't know any of these things, but it does seem to be a fitting possibility to me. >> So, if you're wondering why exactly Tyler would agree to go to the police station if he's not guilty, um, ironically, the police were honest that day. Um, on one of the points, well, first and foremost, that point is Tyler is not suicidal. Um, he wanted to go to the police station so that he didn't risk accidentally getting shot by the police swarming his home. as I said earlier, in a theatrical arrest setting. But rather confusingly, uh, Brooksby, Nate Brooksby tells us that Tyler is suicidal. Whatever. Let's just take a listen to to what Nate Brooksby said after he had been apprehended. Take a listen. >> So, so I get a call from my friend and his his said, "Hey, how you doing?" Good. And it's not, you know, he's been retired a few years. He he'll we'll call each other. It's not it's not unusual for me to get a call from him or vice versa. And at 8:02 p.m. he calls me. Hey, I can tell his voice is kind of shaky. So, my first thought is who who died? Like, who who's he going to tell me that died? And then uh and then I can't I couldn't fathom what actually came out of his mouth. So, he said, "Hey, um I know who I know who Charlie Kirk Shooter is. Um, I I know the family through religious association and uh he's in he's in Washington County now and we're working on trying to get him to come in voluntarily. During that phone call um some information was provided about Tyler uh potentially having some suicidal ideiations was in or out to a remote area Washington County. Um the parents convinced him not to do that and uh you know conveyed that they would uh you know stand by him and help him help him um surrender peacefully. >> I'm told that's that's not true. That Tyler was not suicidal at all. He was just confused and didn't want to get shot. Uh and then he gets to that part, right? He then tells us Brooksby that he came in willingly because he didn't want to die. Let's take a listen to that portion. >> Within the hour, um, my friend, uh, drove Tyler and his parents to my office where he was greeted by, uh, plain closed detectives. So, that was part of the part of the deal is um, Tyler knew it was just inevitable with all the law enforcement pressure that he, you know, his picture in the news, the gun, the gun on the news, he knew it was inevitable uh, that he would be caught. he was fearful of a SWAT team hit on his house or he was fearful of being shot by law enforcement. So part of the negotiation and getting him to bring himself in was that that we would we would treat it as delicate and as soft as possible to make him feel comfortable to where he would he would show up at my office and that's exactly what happened. >> It can't be both. It can't be both. Was he suicidal and wanting to die or was he worried about dying? It can't be both. And I didn't catch on to that early on. It's the answer was he came in because he is not suicidal and did not want to get shot and was confused as I am told. Now you're >> Yeah. Again, this kind of does away with the FBI's narrative. And again, I'm not saying the FBI's narrative is right, but I'm saying this is another major part of what they're saying in the indictment information. And again, this is just another thing that the defense could point to if this goes to trial or gets close to trial and they're mauling the possibility of it going to trial or a plea. They can say, "Hey, you told a lie about this." This is like the third thing that Candace has brought up that completely does away with this narrative. So, more and more, I'm just telling you, these things are lining up to make this guy walk. Maybe that's the intention that he's not supposed to be a psy. then they're not allowing the public to buy the narrative that he's the shooter. If all these things are wrong and that's demonstrated in legal proceedings. So, just another thing to think about. >> Probably wondering why the father and the mother didn't speak out to assert his innocence. That would make sense, right? Uh why don't you come right out and dispute everything immediately? Well, interestingly enough, I'm told that it's because the feds told them that if they spoke out, their lives could be at risk. like they they needed to keep things private and they convinced the family to go into witness protection. >> Okay. Well, if that's the truth, somehow it slipped out that that was the threat that they were threatened by the feds, you know, if they told someone that something dire would happen to them, but they told someone such that that person could tell Candace. So, if that's the case, they violated that. Um, so that's where we're at. I mean, I have no reason to prove or disprove this. Maybe this will come out in defense somehow, too. But it seems as though they didn't take that threat too seriously if they let a source close to Candace know, which was relayed to Candace. >> Your lives are in danger. You shouldn't say anything. Somebody could like, you know, just come back and and try to harm you guys because of what your son did. You should go into witness protection and don't speak to anybody. Trust us, we're the feds, bro. And they agreed, of course, in the fog of it all. Why wouldn't you agree? But then, like any good maybe conservative family, you start going, I don't really trust these feds. Like, I'm a little suspicious about the feds. Here's another point of interest. Okay. His father had no idea that Tyler was gay. That's what I'm told. They are learning this in and through the media. They thought that Lance was just his roommate. And they were especially shocked because apparently Tyler kept mentioning to them that he wanted them to meet some girl that he was seeing. Now, I would like to interject my own voice here and say that I think this girl was likely Lance and Tyler was working up the courage to tell his family that he was gay. >> All right, this completely again goes against the FBI narrative. I'm not defending the FBI. People are going to say that, but I'm saying this is like the fourth or fifth thing that if true, if Can's source is true, they're going to have no case whatsoever against this guy. It's not even going to go to trial. It's too much of an embarrassment at that point because the indictment information says that it was Robinson's mother that explained that he had been becoming more progay and trans rights oriented and that he began to date his roommate. So, the feds are saying that they got this information from Robinson's mother, meaning that they did know about this, or at least the mother did, if the father didn't. And, you know, again, fourth or fifth thing, it's going to destroy their case. He's not going behind bars. No jury would convict him. And no prosecutor worth assault would allow this embarrassment to take place if all of these four or five things are wrong in the indictment in addition to fabricated text messages. That is what is most likely in my opinion because we know for a fact that Tyler was in fact in a relationship with Lance because we have exclusive photos by the way they're about to show you uh that the two of them posted to their Instagrams. This is Lance posting Halloween era photos. I forgot to post my boyfriend is the best. Love you. Um don't worry that handle has since been taken down of what Tyler's handle was, but he's got a handle that doesn't have his name in it. So he's maybe trying to hide this stuff. Um, and then there's another photo of them. And this one's posted by Lance again, pics from when Tyler had a mustache. You can see that they are in a relationship. Just makes sense that he was working up the courage to maybe tell his family about that. Now, I was told also that Tyler is off the charts intelligent and always has been. We know this. He had a perfect GPA in high school. Now, that is precisely what made the idea of him being so stupid as to author a full confessional via text messages pointedly absurd. Like any person with a modicum of intelligence is going to go, I'm not going to put this down in writing with every detail. Uh, and apparently whoever offered those messages, likely feds, didn't have a modicum of intelligence or they would have maybe not included every single detail there. >> Yeah. I mean, I had to admit, if you read the text messages, it does relay basically almost every factor about the crime, the motive, um, where the weapon is, etc. But again, this is something that's going to free him, you know, in court. If this is your narrative, they're fabricating it. It he can't be a psych. He can't both be a pathy and them to either be this corrupt or this incompetent, whichever you think this is. But, uh, yeah, man, that's where we're at here. And we know based on the history here that there was a relationship. I'm glad that Candace pointed that out. She's being fair characterizing that as such. You know, it it'd be very hard to dispose of that narrative now with the information we have. But, you know, I don't know that the the feds are going to have a case again if Candace's source is accurate about all these five things. It completely contravenes the narrative. And guess what? There's a lot of Fed narratives that are completely contravened by the facts. Ruby Ridge and COINTEL Pro and Waco and uh Betty things regarding some of the Fed activities that we all know and love, right? But that is the case here. I just do not think that they can put this guy behind bars if this source is true. Now, if this source is inaccurate, then they got a pretty good case so far, right? And I've had my own problems. I've raised them. On some things, I disagree with Candace. On other things, I agree. Things like the George Zen connection. It doesn't take any kind of speculation, any kind of unnamed sources, any kind of suppositions about the language that a 22-year-old would or wouldn't use, you know, allegations as to what his mental state was at the time or whether he would eat Dairy Queen over, you know, not eating that night or something. This is documented evidence from George Zinn telling the authorities that he tried to help the real killer escape. I think that's much more substantial than most things raised here. so far and Candace has done a good job covering that, but I think it's worth mentioning in comparison to some of this other stuff, which to me it it's a little far-fetched to just cling to rigidly. You know, if it's worth exploring, it's worth exploring. I'm with Candace on exploring every lead. We just seem to prioritize things that seem to be more compelling relative to others a little bit differently. Uh the family says that the photo of the young man that is coming up the stairs which was shared that blurry image is definitively not Tyler Robinson. And let me just say I never thought it looked like him. Neither did you. Okay. Face looks different. Face looks more narrow. Also that person looks taller. Every time I say I'm like this person is taller than Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson also appears to have full lips even though this image is blurry. We're not looking for someone that's got a that got fuller lips and Tyler Robinson looks broader um than that individual walking. Right. So, I I I'm on board with that person walking up the stairs is not Tyler Robinson because I feel like it was intentionally blurred. They also never gave us the footage at all because in order to blur it, they probably needed a static image. Well, I'm totally with her as far as getting better footage and having that released to the public. I think that behooves the FBI if they want the public to take their narrative seriously to do that. I'm with Candace on that 100%. I question whether you would be able to tell someone's height by that kind of angle looking down on them by a stairwell in which there's not many good comparison points because the way in which a lot of people determine like how tall someone is is relative to other objects or relative to other people standing beside them. If I stood beside Shaquille O'Neal, I would look, you know, small compared to Shaquille O'Neal, which I am. But if I stood some next to someone that's 6'1, which I am, I would look roughly equivalent to that. It's hard for me to believe that you can judge someone's height based on that, unless you did some comparisons based on, you know, taking video or pictures of someone coming up that exact stairwell on the same steps, etc., and comparing that to the pictures we have. Without that kind of deduction, I'm not sure so sure that that makes sense. As to what she said about, you know, a source telling her that, you know, they don't think that's Tyler Robinson. That contravenes what the FBI said. And I'm not defending the FBI. People are going to say I'm defending the FBI, but I'm not. I'm saying that this is going to destroy the FBI's case. if this is like the sixth or seventh thing she's pointed out that just completely goes against this and they can demonstrate that the parents didn't think that this was Tyler Robinson because in the second paragraph under the Washington County investigation the whole reason this whole thing started the the interest in Robinson started was because the parents suspicions that those photos looked like their son that the mother had that suspicion she talked to the father and then he agreed and the son didn't dispute that. So, if the defense sees this and not only says that's wrong, but also my defendant doesn't say that, you know, he did this or had anything to do with this and they're persuasive, they have corroborating witnesses, including the parents who would want nothing more to vindicate him if that was the truth, that that's going to get this guy off. So, there's tons of theories in this case, right? You know, some people are just so dead set that this was Erica Kirk, man. She had every motive in the world. She's the CEI of Turning CEO of Turning Point USA now. you know, with the assumption that she was guaranteed to walk into that or there must have been a conspiracy among the board to elect her if Charlie died. You know, hide some reasons to want to do that at all despite every public appearance and any indication, meaning that they had a very healthy relationship. You had the Israel did it no matter what, despite, you know, not really a positive narrative. You had this narrative about Charlie Kirk turning against Israel or at least raising suspicions about Israel's influence in the United States. You know, basically asserting that Epstein could have been a Mossad asset, etc. That's true. And during that stretch, he also defended Hosbbor Zionist propaganda with Ben Shapiro and Megan Kelly. And on other podcasts around the same time, he said it was propaganda that Israel was starving Gaza, things like that. He was Israel's cutout in many ways in the United States. Whether or not he liked Netanyahu, Max Blumenthal's unnamed source said he grew to believe Netanyahu was a bully, but he always defended Israel. You know, you can watch film of him saying Israel is my second favorite country. And I believe Israel has a right to defend itself. That's total Zionist propaganda, by the way. And also saying stuff like, "Hey, you know, I hope they win." Whatever that means. It means I guess they're I hope they ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, I wouldn't say that'd be straw manning him, right? But that is a weird response based on what's happening now. Then you have people thinking this is a conspiracy, but I have no positive narrative to say it was this other guy based on information. Um, you have a lot of people talking a lot a lot of things about this. I tend to think that this guy was involved. I'm sorry to say there's too much here where I don't believe the feds would concoct this narrative only to get it thrown out in court. And I think that's guaranteed. I think that if all these things are wrong and they all line up as being wrong and you have corroborating witnesses and a good defense team, which this guy should have worldclass defense probably, that it's going to get thrown out. But I don't think this is going to go to court. I think that this is going to be um a case in which there's a plea deal and he might avoid the death penalty or something like that. But we'll have to see. But I do want to hear from you. I fully expect to just get, you know, rocked by the comments section here, but that's fine. You know, tell me why I'm controlled opposition because, you know, I'm asking questions and asserting where I don't think points are strong and in other cases where they are. I'm with Candace totally on releasing more information, getting to the bottom of the decoy thing. We haven't gotten any great explanation for that. You know, we haven't had ballistics. I I I suspect ballistics can't get done. We have the information that the bullet was recovered from Charlie, but if it's just a fragment, maybe they can't do ballistics on it to match it to the rifle. the autopsy. I've seen mixed information on the autopsy, whether it's going to be released or not, whether the family is willing to sign off on it or not. But so, there's a lot of information that the public deserves to know that we're not getting, but who knows? Let me know down below what your thoughts are. Please like the video, subscribe to the channel, subscribe to Candace Owens. Thank you, Candace, for this program. And please consider becoming a YouTube member. If you click the join button below, you can help support my channel. And in return, I'll give you all my videos before they go live to the general public. And until I see you guys next time, no more war, no more debt, no more inflation, and no more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you in the next one.
