30-06 Mystery FINALLY SOLVED?!?! NEW Charlie Kirk Conspirators IDENTIFIED...

[00:00] Well, this turned out to be quite the

[00:01] video, you guys. I think Nate ended up

[00:03] solving potentially the 306 mystery and

[00:05] all that after Candace went ham in her

[00:08] members only, and we got to see her tell

[00:10] you what she really thinks about this

[00:12] entire case. All right, Jesse on Fire,

[00:14] welcome back. So, uh, I found out that

[00:16] there are no law enforcement agencies

[00:19] that are still working on the Charlie

[00:21] Kirk assassination. But I have good news

[00:23] for you guys, okay? because I'm still

[00:25] working on it and I'm working on it with

[00:26] a team of people behind the scenes and

[00:28] we are uncovering some serious serious

[00:31] stuff. I cannot exaggerate that. I I

[00:34] it's in fact it's so much stuff that I

[00:36] will have a forthcoming video and I

[00:38] can't even guarantee when it's going to

[00:39] come out. It'll be I mean for sure by

[00:41] Monday the first stage of this uh

[00:45] discovery will start to unfold. But

[00:47] today what we're going to be looking at

[00:48] is Candace Owens. Um, and she's getting

[00:51] she's under fire because on her

[00:52] membersonly area last night, apparently

[00:55] she made some comments uh while you

[00:57] know, I mean, look at her, dude. Like,

[00:59] she's chilling. She's in her she's in

[01:00] her pajamas. She's just talking. It's

[01:02] her members only. It's behind the payw

[01:03] wall. So, she thought she can just say

[01:04] whatever she wants. And it got clipped

[01:07] and uh people are coming after her

[01:08] because she apparently, according to the

[01:11] people who want to clickbait it, she

[01:13] said that Trump had Charlie killed.

[01:15] Right. That is what people are saying

[01:17] that uh that she said. Now, I haven't

[01:20] listened to the whole thing entirely, so

[01:21] I'm going to do that. But before we move

[01:23] on, I'll give you a little bit more

[01:24] information about what it's coming out.

[01:25] What if I told you that the person who

[01:27] drew this picture uh on August 13th and

[01:31] posted it on August 13th also wrote a

[01:36] poem or song titled Charlie Kirk Dead at

[01:40] 31 weeks before Charlie Kirk was

[01:44] assassinated. A couple other things of

[01:46] note there. A that says roof 813. It

[01:51] also has a rifle and it has a person in

[01:54] a prone position apparently on a roof in

[01:56] that image. And it definitely was not

[01:59] Tyler Robinson that drew that picture.

[02:01] And as far as the world knows, it's a

[02:03] person who is not directly connected to

[02:05] Lance and Tyler Robinson even though

[02:07] people were looking at them before.

[02:09] Except we connected them and we can show

[02:11] you exactly how they're connected. We're

[02:13] going to blow the [ __ ] doors off this

[02:15] thing once it's compiled. Literally by

[02:18] Monday we will have it all the way

[02:19] compiled. But for now we're going to

[02:21] look at Candace Owens. Now one quick

[02:22] thing that people kept sending me

[02:24] yesterday is this image right here. Uh

[02:27] and then we'll get into Candace. Okay.

[02:29] So someone sent me this and it was like

[02:31] if if Tyler Robinson was caught on

[02:32] camera running through the UVU courtyard

[02:34] at 12:23 p.m. How the hell was he on the

[02:37] Loi rooftop at the same second? Well, I

[02:40] could certainly answer that if that's

[02:42] not Tyler Robinson or if that's Tyler

[02:45] Robinson there or and the uh the

[02:48] boyfriend is up on the roof. Okay? Or if

[02:51] one of their other conspirators is the

[02:53] one taking the shot, okay, very simple.

[02:55] And if you look, my first reaction to

[02:57] this, I always assume everything is fake

[02:59] until I can prove otherwise, right? My

[03:01] first reaction was I was like, "Okay, no

[03:02] one's running around though." Like, like

[03:03] the everybody's like looking in

[03:05] different directions and these people

[03:06] right here seem to be like walking,

[03:09] right? This doesn't look like someone

[03:11] has just been shot. Here's the thing,

[03:13] though. Okay, even like if this is

[03:14] genuine and it's 12:23, well, guess

[03:16] what? Right there. Okay, right there,

[03:19] there's your Turning Point USA event

[03:21] right there. Okay, and that would mean

[03:24] that this person running is at 12:23

[03:27] right before he's going to be shot.

[03:30] Okay, now let me ask you a common sense

[03:33] question. Okay, let me ask you a common

[03:36] sense question. How would a person be

[03:39] running right before the shot is taken?

[03:42] And what would be the marker? Like they

[03:43] they said, "Hey, we're going to do this

[03:45] right at 12:23." Does that make sense?

[03:46] The way that he would know to be running

[03:48] before everyone else because no one else

[03:50] seems to be running is that Hunter Kak

[03:52] just stood up and walked up to the

[03:54] microphone. Okay, I'm going to get

[03:55] sidetracked and go down a rabbit hole

[03:56] because I know so much other stuff about

[03:58] what we're looking at. I just want to

[03:59] get back and do this. So, we're going to

[04:01] look at Candace Owens and what she

[04:02] actually said and uh and I wanted to So,

[04:05] this is what Steven Crowder said. He

[04:06] said, "You can watch this clip and draw

[04:07] one of two conclusions. Erica Kirk is

[04:09] evil and conspired with the Trump

[04:11] administration to kill her husband or

[04:12] Candace Owens is a uh see you next

[04:14] Tuesday." Okay. Well, uh listen, I met

[04:19] uh and hung out with uh Ian Carol today.

[04:21] Uh new buddy of mine. We've been [ __ ]

[04:23] rapping out all day, dude. Imagine that.

[04:25] That we would be uh that we would be

[04:27] Insta friends, you know. But uh he came

[04:30] instantly to her defense and uh he said

[04:33] that it's a dishonest and transparently

[04:35] incorrect interpretation of her words.

[04:37] So again, I have not I've intentionally

[04:39] not full like not fully watched it. So

[04:41] we're going to watch it now. Um and uh

[04:44] listen, by the way, if you want to be

[04:47] aware when I drop the nuclear bomb on

[04:50] this case that it is going to be you

[04:52] should definitely subscribe to the

[04:53] channel and you should ring the bell for

[04:55] all notifications so that you don't miss

[04:56] it. It'll be within the next couple

[04:58] days. And if you guys don't mind liking

[05:00] this video, that would be amazing as

[05:02] well. So, let's rock and roll.

[05:03] >> My heart aches for the fact that he gave

[05:05] so much of his life to Trump and to

[05:07] politics. And they just were like,

[05:10] "Nope, that is it. It serves us or it

[05:13] doesn't serve us and we want to move

[05:14] on." And so, here's a holiday. Bro, if

[05:18] they try to give me a holiday, what is

[05:19] with them giving people a holiday after

[05:21] they kill them? Why is that a thing? You

[05:22] know what I mean? Like, oh, Martin

[05:24] Luther King, what about this holiday?

[05:25] What about this boulevard? Anyways, let

[05:27] me knock off like they're going to give

[05:28] Charlie Boulevard. They already did.

[05:30] They did in Israel. They gave him

[05:32] freaking bullet. It's like as soon as

[05:33] they give you a boulevard in a holiday,

[05:36] they definitely killed you. Okay.

[05:38] There's no question.

[05:39] >> Number one, that's a joke. Okay. Like

[05:42] for sure she's making a joke. She is

[05:45] certainly not being shy about what she

[05:48] thinks happened here. And I don't think

[05:49] she's been hiding the ball on that from

[05:52] the beginning of this thing. Okay. So, I

[05:53] have people go back and forth. Like,

[05:54] some people are like, "Play the whole

[05:56] video and then go back and and play it

[05:58] again and give your commentary." I'm

[05:59] like, "All right." But then some people,

[06:01] they don't like when I do that. So, I

[06:02] don't know. I'm going to I'll let her

[06:03] talk for a while. I'll do my best. Dude,

[06:06] >> it killed you. There's no way. That's

[06:07] like their signature thing. It's like

[06:08] that's what they do. It's It's the Fed

[06:10] signature. It's sign off after they

[06:12] murder you. You're like holiday in a

[06:14] boulevard. And it's never on a nice side

[06:16] of town either. Like Charlie Kirk

[06:18] Boulevard is not going to be a nice side

[06:19] of town. Anyways, I will be back on the

[06:21] 27th, you guys. Um, thank you guys for

[06:24] all the support throughout these couple

[06:25] of weeks, these last really kind of six

[06:27] weeks since Charlie died and uh we will

[06:29] see you guys then.

[06:31] >> Okay. Well, to me that uh was definitely

[06:35] not her saying Trump definitely killed

[06:37] Charlie Kirk. I do not agree with that

[06:40] interpretation at all. I mean, again,

[06:43] she has been pretty clear that her

[06:46] suspicions uh are in the direction of a

[06:49] foreign country in the Middle East. You

[06:51] know what I mean? And uh and I've said

[06:53] from the beginning I don't agree and the

[06:55] well not from the beginning and the more

[06:57] I thought about it I love Candace and I

[06:59] respect the [ __ ] out of her. all you

[07:00] have to do to earn my respect is just

[07:01] say what you actually think and kind of

[07:03] the more you know the more kind of [ __ ]

[07:06] you you are like you you stick to your

[07:07] guns the more I'm kind of like all right

[07:09] you know that doesn't mean I'm going to

[07:10] be convinced you know because there like

[07:12] in my opinion in this particular case

[07:14] there's I mean you have just blaring

[07:17] holes of logic which are why would they

[07:20] do this in like why would they do this

[07:21] in public right like they could these

[07:24] are people who will you know hit you

[07:26] with a dart then make you have a heart

[07:28] attack you know what I mean shooting him

[07:30] in broad daylight in a college campus

[07:32] with a thousand cell phones would be so

[07:35] stupid. It's kind of hard for me to and

[07:38] I understand like her experience with uh

[07:40] you know has been very challenging with

[07:42] that group. They've slandered her.

[07:43] They've like you know like just look at

[07:45] look at the experience she's had with

[07:47] those Jewish donors. I understand why

[07:49] she would you know be automatically

[07:51] suspicious there. But to me the uh I

[07:56] mean I'm not saying it's not a state

[07:57] actor. I certainly could get behind uh

[08:00] George Soros, China, you know, like so

[08:03] they're trying to start a civil war. But

[08:04] in case you guys have not picked up on

[08:07] what I'm putting down on the global

[08:09] stage here, okay, when that would mean

[08:11] you did not watch my video from today,

[08:13] uh well, I guess this would be yesterday

[08:15] when you guys see this. Okay, I did a

[08:17] video which is titled Virginia Guay

[08:19] exposes Israeli prime minister and I

[08:22] expose why Trump has been burying the

[08:24] Epstein files. And I want to be very

[08:26] clear about this, okay? There is a world

[08:29] war. I say this at the end of the video

[08:31] after I showed everybody why Trump has

[08:34] been actually, you know, covering up the

[08:36] Epstein files. You guys can say in the

[08:37] comments, uh, you know, tell confirm to

[08:40] people they need to go watch that video

[08:41] because I solved I solved the mystery.

[08:44] Okay? Now, without going through that

[08:46] entire video again, you guys can go

[08:47] watch that after. I want to make this

[08:48] perfectly clear. There is a [ __ ]

[08:49] world war going on right now. Okay? And

[08:52] the world war is between Trump, okay?

[08:56] Elon, Peter Teal, Israel, Saudi Arabia,

[09:02] and other allied countries. And the

[09:05] adversary is George Soros, whatever his

[09:09] deep state people are, China, Russia,

[09:13] and their, you know, associated people.

[09:16] Okay? And the foot soldiers here in

[09:19] America are left-wing radicals. Okay?

[09:23] That's reality. That is reality. And you

[09:26] should keep this very very much in the

[09:28] front of your mind in this war which is

[09:31] being fought and if you want to

[09:32] understand much more clearly what like

[09:34] how I can say that so confidently go

[09:36] watch the video that I did for Virginia

[09:37] Guay exposes Israeli prime minister.

[09:39] Okay.

[09:41] The reason that you should be on the

[09:43] right for this which is not really a

[09:45] right or leftwing thing. The reason you

[09:46] should be behind Trump on this

[09:48] regardless of how you feel about him is

[09:49] in his world he is strengthening America

[09:53] and between America, Israel, you know,

[09:56] and these allied countries over here.

[09:58] They're going to build out the Gazas

[10:00] trip, which is monstrous. I completely

[10:01] understand that. But that is their

[10:03] endgame is they're going to build the

[10:04] power through the United States and

[10:06] beyond. Okay? Soros and these guys,

[10:09] Soros and all of them are doing it

[10:11] through China. And their endgame is to

[10:13] destroy the United States. my opinion,

[10:16] China is hoodwinking them, dude. Okay,

[10:18] they could tell them all the way, you

[10:19] know, oh, the future is in is in China,

[10:20] the manufacturing center of the world.

[10:22] The future is in China. America is the

[10:23] past. yada yada yada. And they could,

[10:25] you know, these guys are globalists.

[10:26] They don't give a [ __ ] about America.

[10:27] And so Bill Gates and Soros and them can

[10:29] go make deals with them and do whatever

[10:31] and then, you know, do whatever they

[10:33] think that they need to do to make the

[10:34] America fall. But if you are an American

[10:37] citizen, if you have to think hard about

[10:39] which team you want to be on given that

[10:42] that scenario, if that is the case, then

[10:44] I'm sorry. If the fact that you don't

[10:46] like Trump is your driving force for

[10:48] signing up for, you know, Civil War and

[10:50] Armageddon, you need to get your [ __ ]

[10:51] head checked, dude. Okay? Doesn't matter

[10:53] who you like. Do you want to be able to

[10:54] feed your family? You know what I mean?

[10:56] Do you want to see the American economy

[10:57] collapse? You want to see us get a boot

[10:59] on our neck? Do you want to see the

[11:00] entire like the the way that you live

[11:02] completely flipped upside down? That's

[11:03] their endgame. Okay? And the leftwing

[11:05] radicals are part of that group. All

[11:07] right. So now we are going to look at

[11:09] some very very important pieces of the

[11:12] mystery that are still out there which

[11:14] is the 306.

[11:16] Was it actually that rifle or is it

[11:20] possible that it's that rifle that

[11:22] killed Charlie Kirk? And Valhalla VFT

[11:24] covered this and he Jesus [ __ ] video

[11:27] has 113,000 public views in 4 hours. So

[11:30] this video is going to go ham for him.

[11:32] Good for him. And we're going to react

[11:33] to it cuz he's going to go through this.

[11:34] Now, if you're not familiar with his

[11:35] channel, he's one of the guys. We're

[11:36] doing a uh we're doing a uh Fight

[11:38] Companion November 14th, Jake Paul uh

[11:41] versus Jervante Davis. Me, uh Nate

[11:43] Valhalla, VFT, heavy duty country, and

[11:45] uh and JD Delay are going to be doing

[11:47] it. So, you definitely tune in to that.

[11:49] But, uh we're going to watch his uh his

[11:51] breakdown of this, and then we're going

[11:52] to discuss the conditions. What is the

[11:54] official narrative? So, yes, Charlie was

[11:57] hit with a 306

[11:59] round supposedly according to the FBI.

[12:02] That left no exit wound, which we all

[12:04] know is very, very bizarre. And

[12:07] according to the medical examiner's

[12:10] report that Turning Point USA has put

[12:12] out and told people, if we remember

[12:14] this, yes, the man of steel neck, but

[12:17] the important part of this, of course,

[12:18] is in the end, the coroner did find the

[12:20] bullet just beneath the skin. Turning

[12:23] Point USA also told Steven Gardner that

[12:26] the round came in, impacted the C2,

[12:28] traveled down through all the vertebrae,

[12:30] and then lodged just above the T1.

[12:32] That's very, very important if we're

[12:34] going to make some type of situation

[12:36] work to understand that. Okay. All

[12:39] right. So, let's talk about rounds first

[12:40] and we'll get into grain weights and

[12:42] some other different things. See if we

[12:43] can get a combination of all these

[12:44] things to make it work.

[12:45] >> So, the one thing, let me just say this

[12:47] real quick. I mean, like, just I'll put

[12:48] this out there because the one thing

[12:49] that I put out there in terms of how it

[12:52] could have been a 306 round and it makes

[12:55] sense because I haven't seen this yet.

[12:56] I'm literally putting this on right now.

[12:58] Um, is I said that if they were packing

[13:00] their own rounds, okay, because I heard

[13:01] Ian Carol say that, uh, Ian Carol said

[13:03] that on a podcast we did today and I'm

[13:05] like, I said that at the very beginning.

[13:06] If they're packing their own rounds,

[13:07] they put, you know, if you put less

[13:08] powder in there, of course, it's not

[13:10] going to be an exit. You know, you can

[13:11] have this massive shell casing, but if

[13:14] you reduce the amount of power, then

[13:16] amount of powder, then it's not going to

[13:17] go as fast. You know what I mean? But I

[13:19] have literally no idea where this is

[13:21] going. So, let's see. Work. But first,

[13:23] of course, your full metal jacket 30 six

[13:26] round. Your standard round. All right.

[13:28] Your typical 30 six round here. Uh it's

[13:30] typically going to be used for target

[13:31] shooting, practice, things like that.

[13:33] You definitely can use it for hunting uh

[13:35] if you needed to. But uh yeah, this is a

[13:38] round that's just again designed to

[13:40] enter the body, mushroom out, create

[13:43] damage, and would be one you would

[13:45] likely find in the event like if you

[13:48] were to shoot a moose or something like

[13:49] that and it came off the moose's

[13:50] scapular or something like that, you

[13:52] would actually find the entire round

[13:54] still in the body rather than having it

[13:56] fragment all over the place or

[13:57] disintegrate like some of the rounds

[13:59] we're going to talk about next. All

[14:00] right, next is your soft point round.

[14:02] I've seen some people think this.

[14:03] >> Okay. So, I think he is going to go

[14:05] through the ones that are almost

[14:08] certainly not it. And then we're going

[14:11] just cuz that's how I would structure

[14:12] the video and he's sharp. So, like now

[14:15] I'm I'm just going to push forward. So,

[14:16] you guys want to see the breakdown of

[14:17] all of them obviously go watch his uh

[14:19] his video. But I'm going to you know I

[14:22] mean you should go watch his [ __ ]

[14:23] video anyway, dude. Jesus. I'm just

[14:24] kidding. Uh okay. So, check this out

[14:27] though. some niche rounds where there

[14:29] may be a possibility to create no exit

[14:32] wound. It disintegrated in nothing,

[14:33] which would kind of be the idea if it

[14:35] hit something really hard like hard

[14:37] bone. Okay, it potentially wouldn't

[14:40] create any exit wound. So, you might

[14:42] think, oh, there it is. We solved it. It

[14:43] was a frangible round. But what's the

[14:45] problem with the frangible round idea?

[14:47] Well, it's this. All right. And here's

[14:48] where the frangible round theory kind of

[14:50] gets thrown out with the bathwater. And

[14:51] that's of course because of TurningPoint

[14:53] USA who's put out this information that

[14:56] a bullet was found that came in

[14:58] according to again Turning Point USA who

[15:01] I would assume isn't going to lie about

[15:02] this that that bullet came in at the C2

[15:06] tracked crashed through all of these

[15:09] vertebrae and then lodged into the body

[15:12] here. And that bullet was completely

[15:14] found here. Well, like we just saw on

[15:16] the description of the ammo, the

[15:18] frangible round is designed to

[15:20] essentially disintegrate when it hits

[15:21] something hard. What a frangible round

[15:23] is not going to do is hit hit this neck

[15:25] vertebrae, blast through six more

[15:28] vertebrae all the way down here and then

[15:30] just be fully intact. It would have

[15:33] already disintegrated essentially into

[15:35] the body or fragmented all over the

[15:37] place. So, if it is true that this round

[15:40] again hit hit a neck and crashed through

[15:42] a bunch of bone and the whole thing

[15:43] lodged completely intact inside

[15:45] Charlie's body, it could not have been a

[15:46] franchable round. All right, the next

[15:48] one's very very interesting. I've seen

[15:50] some people start to talk about this and

[15:51] that is the idea. It may have been a 300

[15:54] 6 safety slug. H, let's take a look at

[15:57] this one. All right, so yes, the safety

[15:59] slug. This one's very, very interesting.

[16:01] Okay, as you can see here, a little bit

[16:03] lower grain weight. But the entire idea

[16:05] of this round is it's it's basically an

[16:07] urban combat round. So, it's designed to

[16:09] not penetrate through hard things like

[16:12] walls or different things like that to

[16:14] hit innocent bystanders.

[16:15] >> Okay, I just looked something up and it

[16:17] was a dead end. Okay, so I think he's

[16:19] saying that this is definitely probably

[16:21] not it. Okay, so lowgrain load ammo is I

[16:26] believe what this is. You know, this is

[16:28] the last section. So, I would assume

[16:30] this is where he's going to solve um

[16:32] what we're looking for. So, I'm just

[16:33] going to go ahead and play this. Like I

[16:35] said, I haven't seen it yet, but I I

[16:37] hope I'm right. I I hope I was right

[16:39] with my hypothesis.

[16:40] >> Would not have left an intact bullet in

[16:42] the body, right? So, none of those work

[16:45] all the way together. But what you also

[16:47] have probably seen a lot of is well, it

[16:48] was Grand Papy's reloaded lowgrain

[16:51] reload ammo. So, let's take a look if

[16:54] that's an actual possibility.

[16:56] >> Okay. Okay. So, what he's talking about

[16:57] is if this was um I think what he's

[17:00] talking about is if this was an old like

[17:02] old ammunition that was reloaded in like

[17:05] you know people pack their own rounds

[17:06] like I was talking about. I'm pretty

[17:07] sure that's what he meant.

[17:08] >> All right. So, let's jump into the math.

[17:10] First thing we got to understand is that

[17:11] almost all factory ammunition for 306

[17:13] you're going to buy is going to come in

[17:14] grain weight from around 150 to 220.

[17:18] Typically, a lot of hunters are going to

[17:20] use something like 170 grain. That would

[17:21] be pretty common. So, that's what we

[17:23] used here. All right. So what this math

[17:25] shows is what will be the footpound

[17:27] force. So the imp the force on impact

[17:29] into Charlie, not when it's leaving the

[17:31] gun at 140 yards because that's what the

[17:34] FBI, that's the distance they said the

[17:35] shot was from each of these. Okay. And

[17:38] so what we did is we used 170 grain.

[17:40] Pretty uh average compared to 100 grain.

[17:44] That would be an almost 42% reduction in

[17:48] grain weight. So, I have no idea why you

[17:50] would purposefully load this low of

[17:52] grain into your ammunition, but just

[17:54] for, you know, hypothetical sake, let's

[17:57] say we did this, right? And you might

[17:58] find this interesting. Okay. All right.

[18:00] So, the 100 grain. Okay. It's going to

[18:02] leave the muzzle at about 3,300. Oh my

[18:04] god.

[18:05] I don't know where he's going with this,

[18:08] but I have something to show people

[18:11] afterwards that is relevant to this

[18:14] because the type of rounds that I carry

[18:16] in my everyday carry are called civil

[18:19] defense civil defense rounds. Okay,

[18:21] they're 9 millimeter and they're only 50

[18:23] grain, which is incredibly light. You

[18:25] know, most people carry 120 to 18, you

[18:28] know, like I think 140 is actually like

[18:30] a normal hollow point. Uh, and these are

[18:33] like onethird the weight. So, I've seen

[18:35] videos where people shoot a um uh a

[18:40] watermelon with them, right? And I'll

[18:42] show I'll try to pull these up. And

[18:43] what's interesting about those, so you

[18:45] shoot a full a ball round, it'll go

[18:47] straight through the watermelon. It just

[18:49] comes, you know, the the exit hole is a

[18:50] little bit bigger, but it's nothing, you

[18:52] know, but it kind of goes straight

[18:53] through. Shoot a hollow point and it

[18:55] mushrooms and it blows the whole thing

[18:57] up and it's, you know, super crazy on

[18:59] the backside. But with the civil defense

[19:01] rounds, it might have actually been the

[19:03] honeydew that I saw this with, which is

[19:04] harder than a than a uh a watermelon.

[19:06] When you shoot it, it blows up from the

[19:08] front. Like it it blows up from the

[19:10] front. It's the only one that does that.

[19:12] And that's the super super super light

[19:14] round. I had not thought about that. The

[19:16] only problem though is that those rounds

[19:18] typically, you know, will go, you know,

[19:20] they'll like they'll if they're not

[19:22] frangible, like a civil defense round is

[19:24] going to break up actually. So, [ __ ]

[19:26] man. That is crazy, dude. it. I wonder

[19:28] if they make super I'm going to look

[19:30] that up while he talks. I'm sorry. I'm

[19:31] just I'm spitballing here.

[19:33] >> 100 feet per second. It's actually

[19:34] higher because there's uh less weight to

[19:36] it as it leaves the muzzle. But keep in

[19:37] mind because of the much less grain,

[19:40] it's going to quickly reduce in velocity

[19:43] compared to the 170 grain. But that

[19:45] doesn't really matter. What matters is

[19:47] what is the footpound force on the

[19:49] impact when it hit Charlie. And as you

[19:52] can see here, all right, 100 grain at

[19:54] 140 yards. The kinetic energy when it

[19:57] hits Charlie 24,47 feetbs. Okay.

[20:01] Compared to your typical 170 grain at

[20:04] 140 140 yards, excuse me, you're going

[20:06] to have a kinetic energy of about 2,432

[20:10] ft-lb. So, the point being here is that

[20:13] yes, it's less. It's about 400 ft-lb

[20:15] less. A 100 grain 306 round is still

[20:20] hitting Charlie Kirk's necks with 2,047

[20:23] feetbs. that is still with a full metal

[20:26] jacket round soft point is going to

[20:29] again blow right through Charlie Kirk's

[20:31] neck. That's not a reduction of enough

[20:35] um kinetic energy to really make any

[20:37] difference on Charlie Kirk's you know

[20:39] little human neck and a neck vertebrae.

[20:41] So with low grain reloaded ammo and you

[20:43] purposely put you know 40% less grain in

[20:46] and again I don't know why you would do

[20:47] this maybe like a mistake. Uh still it's

[20:51] going to go right through Charlie Kirk

[20:52] even with that. All right. Next, I see

[20:54] people talking about, "Oh, well, it was

[20:55] a subsonic 300 six round." First, I

[20:58] don't think that is true because from

[20:59] the sound of the shot, it does sound

[21:01] like a supersonic round. But, uh, people

[21:04] have said, well, you got to lower the

[21:05] grain weight so much to make it

[21:07] subsonic. You don't make a 306 round

[21:09] subsonic by controlling the grain

[21:10] weight. You have to control the muzzle

[21:12] velocity. And I don't think you could

[21:13] even load low enough grain weight for

[21:16] the gun to fire correctly, which would

[21:18] bring us into the possibility of

[21:19] something like a squib or some type of

[21:22] massive malfunction of the round. All

[21:24] right. So, I I literally was just

[21:26] looking up um the lowest grain weights

[21:29] for 306 ammunition, and they said that

[21:31] some specialized subcaliber rounds can

[21:34] use bullets as light as 55 grams. Oh,

[21:36] subcaliber rounds. Uh but these require

[21:38] a Sabo to fit the 300 6 cartridge. I

[21:42] don't even know what a Sabo is. Um,

[21:46] yeah, I don't even know what a Sabo is.

[21:48] So, I don't even know why I'm even

[21:50] contributing to this. He obviously knows

[21:52] a lot better than I do, right? And if

[21:54] you have that massive of a malfunction,

[21:55] the gun's not even going to fire right

[21:57] correctly anyway. So, that doesn't

[21:58] really make sense. All right. But what

[22:00] if we use a combination of both? Can we

[22:02] use Grand Papy's old reloaded ammo that

[22:05] we loaded in super low grain for

[22:07] whatever reason? I don't know. And a

[22:10] specific round type that would not leave

[22:12] an exit wound. I think possibly. I think

[22:14] probably yes. What would that be? Well,

[22:16] Grand Papy's old reloaded ammo 90 100

[22:19] grain with a frangible round tip. Now

[22:22] all of a sudden we're in potential

[22:23] possibilities of a type of round that we

[22:25] would have seen actually hit Charlie and

[22:28] not create an exit wound. There is real

[22:31] possibility in that, but what's the

[22:33] problem? That round would disintegrate.

[22:36] There would be no round found in Charlie

[22:38] Kirk's body for the most part other than

[22:39] some tiny little fragmentation.

[22:41] >> But I think but that is what they said

[22:43] that they found in Charlie Kirk's

[22:46] medical report. So like that's what they

[22:48] said that they found and that's that's

[22:49] what Candace said that was in the

[22:50] medical report was a fragment of the

[22:53] bullet. And here's the other thing too.

[22:55] The reason that that's important to note

[22:57] also is because everybody's been looking

[22:59] to confirm whether or not there is a

[23:02] recovered actual 306 round because that

[23:05] would validate that it was that rifle

[23:07] that was used in the crime. And as far

[23:09] as I know, no one has produced that,

[23:12] right? Like as far as I know, no one's

[23:14] produced that. Um, so I honestly I feel

[23:18] weird. I feel like I've I've so I'm

[23:20] gonna actually I'm going to stop right

[23:22] here so that you can go watch his video

[23:23] to see what his conclusion is. But I

[23:26] will say that what he said right there

[23:29] lines up with what I understand about

[23:31] the uh the autopsy, right? That it was

[23:34] just all that was recovered was a

[23:36] fragment of the round stuck here. So

[23:39] that would line up, right? Let me see.

[23:42] Yeah, if I I'll tell you what. If I can

[23:44] find the video that I'm referencing

[23:46] about the uh civil defense rounds, I

[23:47] will put them in right here. If I can't,

[23:48] then this is the end of the video. And I

[23:50] love you guys indefinitely. Trust me, I

[23:52] cannot stress this enough. I am going to

[23:55] show I am going to blow the [ __ ] lid

[23:56] off this case like very soon. So pay

[24:00] attention.