[00:00] Hello and welcome back to Trigger Smart.
[00:01] So yesterday Candace came out and said
[00:04] that Andrew Kovette's original tweet or
[00:06] message, wherever it was, they said that
[00:08] Charlie had a neck made of steel and all
[00:10] this kind of stuff from the surgeon and
[00:12] that it was a 30 out 6 round made
[00:15] everyone immediately assume that it was
[00:18] a typical 30 six round. So, in all the
[00:21] testing that's online and everyone
[00:23] that's been posting videos and ballistic
[00:25] gel and everything else and shooting
[00:27] animal parts and pork shoulders and that
[00:29] kind of stuff, they weren't able to get
[00:31] the bullet to stay inside of it, which
[00:33] made sense. And that's why people like
[00:35] Valhalla, Paramount Tactical, and some
[00:38] of the other channels immediately went
[00:40] to that's impossible. Not going to
[00:42] happen. That's why they weren't buying
[00:44] the narrative. That's basically the only
[00:46] reason why most people weren't buying
[00:49] the original FBI narrative. Now, there's
[00:51] other extenduating circumstances around
[00:53] all of that, like who helped Tyler
[00:55] Robinson if he's the shooter? Was there
[00:58] an actual second shooter and he was set
[01:00] up? Was there some foreign government
[01:02] involvement? Right? So, there's all
[01:04] those questions. Those are still there.
[01:05] But the original 306 question, if what
[01:08] Candace says is true, means that
[01:11] frangible ammo was used. So, that's what
[01:13] we're going to cover today. I'm going to
[01:14] show you examples of what it can do and
[01:17] then we're going to kind of talk about
[01:18] this whole new theory. Now, if it's 306
[01:21] FBI narrative and frangible ammo, then
[01:25] it might work. Let's get into it. First,
[01:27] let's see a demonstration of what
[01:29] frangible ammo looks like when it
[01:31] actually hits its target.
[01:39] So, do you see that? So you have an
[01:41] intact bullet and basically to sum up
[01:45] what a frangible round is is it's loaded
[01:48] just like a regular round. It's in the
[01:50] same cartridge. Everything else it has
[01:52] the same casing. It has gunpowder behind
[01:54] it just like a regular full metal jacket
[01:56] or similar type of round. The difference
[01:58] is that the bullet that you see flying
[02:00] through the air, the projectile is
[02:02] compressed or compacted powder, usually
[02:05] metal powder. So when it hits its
[02:07] target, it basically disintegrates on
[02:10] contact. All right? And depending on
[02:12] what you have as far as like the flesh
[02:14] or the bone or like in this case
[02:17] shooting steel or wood, sometimes that
[02:19] tip doesn't break up and sometimes it
[02:20] still penetrates. So if you were, for
[02:22] example, to shoot a water bottle or in
[02:25] some cases ballistic gel, which I've
[02:27] said before is not a one to one for
[02:29] human flesh because it doesn't have
[02:30] muscles and tendons and bones and stuff
[02:32] in it. Some sometimes it will still
[02:33] penetrate and the bullet will still be
[02:35] intact. But if it hits metal or bone,
[02:38] then it can disintegrate like you see
[02:40] here. So now I want to address the
[02:42] elephant in the room. People are going
[02:43] to say if Andrew Kovit made up this
[02:45] original lie or embellished on what the
[02:48] surgeon supposedly said, then how can we
[02:50] believe that this is true? Well, because
[02:52] this actually makes sense. But like Vala
[02:54] said last night, that brings up other
[02:56] issues because it's very convenient, if
[02:59] it was a frangible round, that whoever
[03:02] was responsible for this, if even if
[03:04] it's Tyler Robinson, that's not really
[03:06] traceable back to a specific weapon
[03:08] because the the bullet is basically
[03:11] disintegrated and gone at that point.
[03:12] There's fragments, but you can't see the
[03:15] rifling pattern and that kind of stuff
[03:16] like you typically can from a regular
[03:18] bullet. So that means that they can't
[03:21] trace this bullet directly back to
[03:24] Tyler's gun in theory. Now, the fangible
[03:28] metals and the powder that's compacted
[03:30] in that bullet, they said that the
[03:31] casing was still in the gun. So, in
[03:33] theory, they could test the compounds of
[03:35] both and maybe link them up that way.
[03:37] But, let's get more into kind of what
[03:39] frangible ammo is and what it does. This
[03:42] is a 223 or 5.56 like you would use an
[03:45] AR-15, but the idea is the same. So
[03:49] higher calibers might penetrate slightly
[03:51] further. They might actually even
[03:53] vaporize more because they have more
[03:54] power behind them, more footpounds of
[03:56] force when it hits. But this gives you
[03:57] an idea of kind of what it does.
[03:59] Typically, you would expect for it to
[04:01] come in the front, fly through the
[04:03] entire block, and exit the other side.
[04:05] And then you see a large wound cavity
[04:07] and it expands, right? And that's
[04:08] typically what we see.
[04:11] It comes in and as you can see there's
[04:14] the large wound cavity but the wound
[04:16] cavity is only going about halfway
[04:18] across the block. Right? And you have
[04:20] some shrapnel. You have some pieces that
[04:22] have broken off and each of these little
[04:25] pieces can do damage in their own way.
[04:29] So the theory now makes a lot more sense
[04:32] because if this bullet comes in, it hits
[04:36] the skin and then it hits the vertebrae,
[04:38] breaks up into pieces and then each of
[04:41] these pieces either hits a different
[04:43] vertebrae or just the fact that this
[04:47] power coming in, the foot pounds of
[04:48] force from that 30 six is going to hit
[04:50] that vertebrae and then the cavitation
[04:53] is going to cause damage up and down the
[04:54] spine and could even cause damage to the
[04:57] brain stem and up into the brain. which
[04:59] could explain that posture. But you can
[05:01] see as it comes in, it doesn't penetrate
[05:04] through, but it causes massive
[05:06] cavitation.
[05:09] And this is what we saw when Charlie got
[05:11] hit.
[05:13] So, this explains what we're seeing. And
[05:15] this also makes the neck wound as well
[05:19] as the cavitation as well as the broken
[05:21] vertebrae all make sense because now
[05:24] we're not talking about a situation
[05:26] where the bullet comes in and hits and
[05:28] then bounces down and changes directions
[05:30] and hits different vertebrae. Now we
[05:32] have compacted powder in a bullet that
[05:34] still has a ton of force behind it. It
[05:37] hits the vertebrae and that force and
[05:39] that cavitation spreads out through
[05:41] everything and destroys everything. And
[05:43] that could even put more pressure on
[05:44] that initial entrance wound to make that
[05:46] wound bigger and make the blood, you
[05:48] know, gush out like we saw. All right,
[05:50] so let's dig a little bit more into
[05:52] fangible ammo. So you can see, like we
[05:54] saw in those videos, the bullet looks
[05:56] like a regular intact bullet, but it's
[05:58] compacted metal powder instead of a full
[06:01] metal jacket, instead of a one solid
[06:02] piece of metal. It comes in when it hits
[06:06] it instantly starts to expand into its
[06:08] powdery components and it just basically
[06:11] turns into a mist or a powder. This is
[06:14] what happens when it hits something
[06:15] solid when it hits the outside of it.
[06:17] But if it goes into a body or into flesh
[06:20] or into something soft, it's going to
[06:23] keep going and dissipate all the energy
[06:25] from the shot. But then once it hits
[06:27] something hard inside like the vertebrae
[06:29] in Charlie's case, then it does this
[06:31] inside of his body.
[06:33] And that energy is spread into his
[06:36] vertebrae and expands out into his other
[06:38] vertebrae. So that makes a lot of sense
[06:40] now because it's not going to just go in
[06:42] to the entry wound and out the out the
[06:44] back like everyone was expecting. And
[06:45] what many people use this type of round
[06:47] for is for military training. And then
[06:50] some competition shooters also get it,
[06:51] but it is much more expensive in some
[06:53] cases. And you're also exposed to a lot
[06:56] of lead, but you can get lead free
[06:58] variants. But the reason why it's a good
[07:00] training aid is because you can get as
[07:01] close as you want to the steel. You can
[07:04] be a foot away from it and shoot it and
[07:06] it's going to hit and become powder. So
[07:07] you don't have to worry about it
[07:08] ricocheting and coming back at you. It
[07:10] makes it much more convenient,
[07:12] especially for CQB style training for
[07:15] the military. So here's what it looks
[07:16] like. You have your bullet and this
[07:19] bullet is compacted powder.
[07:23] I'm not sure of the exact science of how
[07:25] they make the powder hold its shape and
[07:26] that kind of stuff, but I'm sure with
[07:28] enough pressure or force they can get it
[07:31] to maintain its shape in a press or
[07:32] something similar. I have to do more
[07:34] research into that, but um it
[07:36] disintegrates when it hits something
[07:38] hard enough. Now, a typical faux metal
[07:40] jacket looks like this when it breaks
[07:42] up.
[07:44] So, you have the lead pieces and you
[07:46] have the copper pieces. Now, if this is
[07:49] what hit Charlie, then yes, it would
[07:51] probably just go right through, right?
[07:53] Just like Dr. Chris Martinson, Valhalla,
[07:57] Paramount Tactical, Range Day Bro, I
[07:59] mean, all these there's there's hundreds
[08:01] of other people that have done it, too.
[08:02] Like First Shot TV, all their tests, the
[08:05] bullet just flew right through and
[08:07] exploded whatever it was going through.
[08:09] This is the type of round they were
[08:11] using or something similar, right? It
[08:13] had much harder components that are
[08:14] designed for penetration. Now, this type
[08:18] of bullet is more for practicing and for
[08:22] up close shooting, and it was also used.
[08:25] There's some World War II versions of
[08:26] it. So, I had a thought. If Tyler
[08:28] Robinson has his grandfather's old
[08:30] rifle,
[08:31] does he have his grandfather's old World
[08:33] War II frangible ammo? Because it was
[08:36] very popular back then. So digging in a
[08:38] little bit more, you find things like
[08:40] this. Frangible ammunition, especially
[08:42] 30 caliber like 306 for machine guns,
[08:45] was used in World War II primarily for
[08:47] gunnery, allowing people to train
[08:49] without endangering pilots or causing
[08:50] ricochets with live aircraft. I had
[08:53] looked at World War I and French ammo
[08:56] was not as common. So, I don't know if
[08:59] there's something there, but my thought
[09:00] was if Tyler Robinson has his
[09:02] grandfather's old gun, could he also
[09:04] have his grandfather's old frangible
[09:06] ammo laying around? It's possible, but
[09:09] it's not impossible to get frangible
[09:12] ammunition. And if he was working with a
[09:14] group of people, any of them could get
[09:17] access to it or have it and provide it
[09:19] to him. And to a lot of people who are
[09:21] saying that Tyler Robinson couldn't do
[09:25] this because he looks like a nerd. He
[09:26] games all the time, you know, he was he
[09:29] was apparently he was on his phone
[09:31] playing Wordle or something after the
[09:33] shooting. You have to remember that
[09:35] these kind of skills
[09:38] are built behind the scenes. So, there's
[09:41] actually a popular YouTube channel of a
[09:43] guy who is a I believe he is transgender
[09:46] and um they're kind of like that LGBTQ
[09:49] militia type mentality and they train
[09:52] all the time, but if you saw them in
[09:54] person on the street, you would never
[09:56] ever realize that they were highly
[09:59] trained with guns. So, I think people
[10:01] using the he looks like argument. That's
[10:03] not a very strong argument. Supposedly,
[10:06] Tyler Robinson's brother is also very
[10:08] into guns and hunting. And some of these
[10:11] images show, you know, him with AR-15.
[10:14] We know that his father was a police
[10:16] officer, and obviously they use guns.
[10:18] And of course, you remember this
[10:19] [ __ ]
[10:23] Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. We
[10:25] got him.
[10:27] On the evening of September 11th, a
[10:30] family member of Tyler Robinson reached
[10:32] out to a family friend who contacted the
[10:35] Washington County Sheriff's Office with
[10:37] information that Robinson had confessed
[10:39] to them or implied that he had committed
[10:42] the incident. This information was
[10:44] relayed to the Utah County Sheriff's
[10:46] Office and scene investigators at Utah
[10:48] Valley University.
[10:49] >> Confession
[10:51] and implying are two very different
[10:54] things.
[10:55] There are some people that do not buy
[10:57] this narrative that he was the killer
[11:00] for some various reasons, but let's look
[11:03] at what Mike Glover has to say about it
[11:05] >> as an example would be super unlikely. I
[11:08] mean, the biggest controversy is
[11:10] obviously the JFK assassination. To
[11:12] think that Oswald alone was a lone
[11:16] gunman with no help and coordination
[11:20] after he travels to Russia, like what?
[11:23] Like, so I'm afraid the further away we
[11:26] get from it, every day that we get away
[11:27] from it, the more it becomes a
[11:30] conspiracy and the less it becomes
[11:32] confirmable.
[11:34] And I just think it's it's ass
[11:37] backwards. I and other people are saying
[11:39] the same thing. And now with this
[11:41] information about this frangible round,
[11:43] they say even though it can explain what
[11:45] happened in the official 306 FBI
[11:48] narrative, it adds more questions. So,
[11:51] is there someone else behind this?
[11:53] Right? So, he could be the shooter, but
[11:56] who set him up? Who groomed him? Who
[11:57] provided him the equipment? How did he
[11:59] learn how to shoot? Now, again, his
[12:01] father was police. So, if I have a child
[12:04] and I'm a police officer or I, you know,
[12:06] like in my case, a firearms instructor,
[12:08] then yeah, I' I've taught my children.
[12:10] They know how to shoot. I want to make
[12:11] sure they know how to defend themselves
[12:12] with a firearm. So, it is not beyond
[12:15] reality to think that he knew how to
[12:17] shoot. And they also said that they
[12:19] hunted. So he can handle 140 or 200 yard
[12:23] shot fairly easily if he has that kind
[12:25] of experience. And if he is going to be
[12:28] planning this shot, planning how to get
[12:30] in, how to Xfill and all these different
[12:32] things, he has as much time as he wants
[12:35] to learn this stuff.
[12:37] He just took the opportunity at UVU
[12:40] because he said in a message somewhere
[12:41] that UVU was a really bad venue to do
[12:45] this at. So I think he just saw that
[12:47] opportunity, but we don't know how long
[12:49] he was training for. where his parents
[12:50] said that it was up to like a year that
[12:52] he'd be getting more radicalized and
[12:54] turning more leftist. So imagine someone
[12:56] taking an entire year and shooting with
[12:58] this supposed like LGBTQ
[13:01] militia.
[13:02] Doesn't even have to be a militia. It
[13:04] could just be friends, right? His
[13:06] radicalized friends. They can go to a
[13:08] range. It's not illegal. Anyone can pick
[13:10] ammo up and go to, you know, go to a
[13:11] range with a rifle. If you're not a
[13:13] felon, then you can shoot. So he could
[13:16] practice. And it doesn't have to be
[13:18] something just public that everyone
[13:19] sees. He could do this on someone's farm
[13:22] somewhere. He could do this in a forest
[13:23] with his friends, right? So to think
[13:26] that he couldn't get good enough for
[13:29] basic shooting is asinine. And I can
[13:32] tell you with 100% certainty that my
[13:34] children, one of which is 11 years old,
[13:38] can easily hit 3, four, 5, 600 yards,
[13:43] especially with a 65 Creedmore or 30 6.
[13:45] There would be other stresses.
[13:46] Obviously, you have the stress of taking
[13:48] another person's life in front of a
[13:50] crowd, the fear of getting caught and
[13:52] all of that stuff, but again, the shot
[13:53] itself
[13:55] is not impossible or extremely
[13:57] difficult, especially at 140 yards. If
[14:00] you ever go out and shoot, 140 yards is
[14:03] fairly simple, right? He told me that
[14:08] the FBI is not cooperating with him
[14:12] and he is trying to corroborate
[14:16] potential foreign influence
[14:18] and was getting blocked out of every
[14:23] opportunity to confirm or deny that. And
[14:26] it was written off as no foreign
[14:29] influence less than 48 hours in.
[14:33] and this guy has access to the president
[14:35] of the United States.
[14:37] >> So, he's saying that someone he knows
[14:40] was trying to get FBI information and he
[14:43] was getting blocked when he was trying
[14:45] to dig more into this case and um
[14:48] apparently blocked not just like
[14:50] communication wise and access-wise, but
[14:52] also physically. So, this raises a lot
[14:56] more questions now. And then of course
[14:58] we have Candace Owens and she brings the
[15:01] new pieces of the story that Andrew
[15:03] Kovit made up who has also since wiped
[15:06] his social media and made some of them
[15:08] private which is very strange. But
[15:10] Candace is saying that the surgeon
[15:12] didn't say the original things like he
[15:14] had a steel neck and some of the other
[15:16] allegations. She's saying that the
[15:19] surgeon who is also a hunter says that
[15:21] he initially thought it was a frangible
[15:23] round. Yesterday, I revealed to you that
[15:26] I was told that Andrew Kovette was
[15:28] allegedly flying blind when he tweeted
[15:32] out the conversation that he had with
[15:34] the surgeon. Now, just to jog your
[15:36] memory, how that all came about was me
[15:40] doing the the show and saying, "Oh, I
[15:42] saw the back footage and there was no
[15:45] blood." And then very quickly, which I
[15:48] didn't really understand why he had done
[15:49] this. Uh he tweeted out that long tweet
[15:52] about Superman neck and he puts this
[15:54] quotation in here. Absolutely. The
[15:56] bullet should have gone through, which
[15:57] is very normal for a highowered, high
[15:59] velocity round. I've seen wounds from
[16:01] this caliber many times and they always
[16:03] just go through everything. This would
[16:05] have taken a moose or two down, an elk,
[16:08] etc. Next up, that quotation continues.
[16:12] Uh, it was an absolute miracle that
[16:14] someone else did not get killed. His
[16:16] bone was so healthy and the density was
[16:18] so so impressive that he's like the man
[16:20] of steel. It should have just gone
[16:22] through and through. It likely would
[16:23] have killed those standing behind him,
[16:25] too. It's kind of been a mess since.
[16:27] This is kind of the beginning of
[16:28] everything, right? If we're being
[16:29] honest, that one solitary tweet was the
[16:32] beginning of the what I would call
[16:33] federal mask slip. It
[16:36] >> which is 100% true. So everything that
[16:39] everyone's been looking at and the
[16:40] reason why all these crazy theories have
[16:42] come out
[16:44] like the exploding pager or microphone,
[16:47] the shot from behind with a, you know,
[16:49] drone um air actuated faking his death.
[16:53] I mean, you name it. There's like 50
[16:55] different theories and they're still
[16:57] going. The electrocution theory just
[16:58] came out. Now, if one of those ends up
[17:01] being true with some proof, then that
[17:03] could be what happened. But the original
[17:05] story makes sense with what she's going
[17:08] to share that the surgeon actually said.
[17:11] And way back then, if we would have
[17:13] known that it was a friendable round,
[17:15] then everyone else would have moved on
[17:17] and stopped looking so deep into this
[17:19] and come up with all these other
[17:20] theories. And um this also could have
[17:23] made it so that if this is the correct
[17:26] narrative and this is the correct round,
[17:28] the frangible ammo, it would have made
[17:30] it so that that energy and time everyone
[17:31] put into all these other theories could
[17:34] have been put into this case to figure
[17:36] out who else was working with Tyler
[17:38] Robinson.
[17:39] >> Feels like they have been feeding us
[17:41] slop ever since. Well, I now feel
[17:44] comfortable revealing some more
[17:45] information for you. some that I have
[17:47] held on to but which I the people who
[17:50] gave this to me are now insisting that I
[17:52] reveal simply put and I'm going to say
[17:54] allegedly here only because I did not
[17:57] speak directly to Dr. Lee Troder but I
[18:01] very much have verified and trust this
[18:03] source. Uh simply put never once did Dr.
[18:07] Lee Troder say that Charlie's neck was
[18:10] stopped uh Charlie's neck stopped a 306
[18:13] bullet. It's actually hugely
[18:15] embarrassing uh to for any surgeon to
[18:18] have said something like that. It's
[18:19] hugely embarrassing. All
[18:21] >> okay, now this might be a misspeak on
[18:22] her part because she's saying that the
[18:24] surgeon never said that his neck stopped
[18:26] a 3006 bullet and then she's going to
[18:28] say that it was frangible ammo and a
[18:30] 3006 and his neck stopped it, right? So,
[18:33] if this is correct, his neck did stop a
[18:36] 3006 bullet, but the bullet just
[18:38] happened to be frangible. So, that's
[18:39] kind of a misspeak there. I think
[18:41] >> also because we're being told that like,
[18:43] you know, he's violating HIPPA to get
[18:45] this information out there in this very
[18:47] high stress situation, you're actually
[18:49] accusing him of being not a professional
[18:51] on top of also kind of being an idiot.
[18:54] And you can imagine that that's put a
[18:55] lot of undue stress on the surgeon's
[18:57] family as many of them have been wrongly
[19:00] implicated in a coverup. like the
[19:03] absurdity of such a narrative. If you're
[19:05] going to put something out there,
[19:06] there's going to be flak that comes upon
[19:08] the surgeon, the other doctors, the
[19:10] nurses.
[19:11] >> She's saying that Andrew Kulvit saying
[19:13] that specific statement implicated the
[19:16] surgeon and could put them at risk and
[19:19] damage his reputation, but she's doing
[19:21] the same thing with everyone at TPUSA
[19:24] and any other leads that she finds. So,
[19:27] she's doing the exact same thing that
[19:28] she's saying Andrew Kovit shouldn't be
[19:30] doing. But, let's keep going.
[19:31] >> Were you involved? Did you try to get
[19:32] Charlie Kirk killed? Were you involved
[19:34] in this in staging this? Why would you
[19:35] say that he ate healthy? Right? There's
[19:37] no doctor or surgeon that would say
[19:39] something like that. So to restate that,
[19:41] the quotation that Andrew Kovette shared
[19:43] on his ex feed is not a direct quotation
[19:47] from the surgeon like at all. Rather,
[19:51] what I was told is that what the surgeon
[19:54] communicated very clearly to Andrew and
[19:57] yes, it is absolutely true that the
[20:00] surgeon Dr. Troder hunts, so he does
[20:03] have experience with bullets. What he
[20:05] communicated is that it was likely a
[20:07] frangible bullet that was used.
[20:10] >> Okay. So then she goes on to talk about
[20:12] the frangible bullet. Now, in all
[20:15] fairness, like yes, she's shared this
[20:17] information. She says a source that she
[20:19] says she trusts is speaking for the
[20:21] surgeon and what he said. So, I mean, if
[20:24] if if the surgeon was talking to Andrew
[20:26] Kovit, was this person on three-way with
[20:29] the surgeon? Was this person in the room
[20:31] with the surgeon when he's talking to
[20:33] Andrew Kovit? I mean, it would have to
[20:35] be a nurse or a doctor or someone close
[20:37] to be able to be in that area. And that
[20:39] would still go against HIPPA for them to
[20:42] share this information out that the
[20:44] surgeon said. And this is not quoting
[20:46] the surgeon directly. This is a third
[20:49] party quoting the surgeon. Actually, a
[20:51] fourth party because now Candace is
[20:52] quoting someone else who's quoting the
[20:54] surgeon. But if this is true, then this
[20:57] explains the original narrative of a 306
[21:01] hitting his vertebrae causing the damage
[21:03] that we see and not exiting out the
[21:05] back. Now, a lot more people are on
[21:07] board, right? But again, this is very
[21:10] strange the timing. And she said in this
[21:13] video that I've been sitting on this
[21:16] information and I didn't want to share
[21:18] it out. How long has she had this? Has
[21:21] she had this for a couple months, for a
[21:24] couple weeks, couple days?
[21:26] Because people have been running around
[21:29] with all these these theories, including
[21:32] myself, searching for what could explain
[21:35] something other than this crazy 306
[21:38] that, you know, bounced around and and
[21:40] went down his spine and vertebrae and
[21:41] everything and acted like bullets don't
[21:44] act, right? If she's had this
[21:46] information, how long has she had it?
[21:47] Because she said she's been sitting on
[21:49] it. Okay. So, that would be my question
[21:51] to her. But this does explain a 306
[21:55] hitting his neck, cavitating, damaging
[21:58] his vertebrae. That damage in that
[22:00] cavitation could cause what we saw if it
[22:03] damaged part of his brain stem or his
[22:04] brain from the cavitation, making him
[22:06] seize up and go into that dorticate
[22:08] posture. It explains the wound because
[22:11] if it goes in, right, because this
[22:13] bullet can penetrate it initially, then
[22:15] it hits the vertebrae and then it
[22:16] releases all of its energy and it
[22:18] basically disintegrates. that pressure
[22:20] has to come out somewhere and that entry
[22:22] wound is going to be the path of least
[22:24] resistance. So that blood and stuff is
[22:26] going to come back out from that
[22:27] pressure. So that makes a lot of sense.
[22:29] This changes a lot of things if it's
[22:31] true. But again, she's quoting someone
[22:35] who's quoting someone else who's quoting
[22:37] someone else and she says she's verified
[22:39] the source. How do we know that? Right?
[22:42] Because she shared the Andrew Kovit
[22:43] stuff initially and that was the source
[22:46] and he was incorrect supposedly, right?
[22:49] So, this is a lot of hearsay, but if
[22:51] this is true, that explains basically
[22:54] everything. So, now we have to look into
[22:56] who else was helping him, where did he
[22:58] get the ammo, because again, this isn't
[23:00] super common ammo. So, maybe you could
[23:03] trace it back somehow through the
[23:04] purchases, even if he got it from
[23:06] someone else. So, then you have the
[23:08] other case, too, where when the gun was
[23:10] found, which first of all, why would he
[23:12] ditch the gun? If he's clear and free
[23:14] and he's off campus and he's over in the
[23:16] forest, why would he ditch the gun?
[23:18] But even besides that, let's say he did
[23:20] ditch it. They had dogs that went out
[23:22] there supposedly. She's hearing from,
[23:24] you know, EMTs and uh people that were
[23:26] on the ground there, police officers and
[23:28] the search people. Supposedly, they are
[23:31] saying that the gun was not there
[23:33] initially, but dogs went through and
[23:35] they didn't find it. And then the FBI
[23:37] shows up and all of a sudden, this gun
[23:40] is found. So, these dogs don't typically
[23:43] miss stuff like that. You have to
[23:44] remember that they can track people
[23:46] based on just footprints and the change
[23:49] in temperature and that kind of stuff
[23:51] where they stepped previously, right?
[23:53] And they can easily sniff out gunpowder,
[23:55] guns, bombs, that kind of stuff. That's
[23:57] why they use them everywhere. So, this
[23:59] is very strange, but let me know your
[24:02] thoughts down in the comments. The
[24:04] French ammo 100% fits, but why is it
[24:08] only coming out now? Is the source
[24:10] credible?
[24:12] And does this implicate much more than
[24:14] we originally thought? As always, don't
[24:16] forget to like, subscribe, and share
[24:18] this around. And if you want to support
[24:19] the channel, you can look down in the
[24:21] description for links. And I'll see you
[24:23] on the next one.