Zach from WolvesAndFinance Investigates Shocking Evidence Government Is Lying About Charlie Kirk Shooting
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Candace Owens Questions FBI Narrative on Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation and Missing Evidence
34:06
Candace Owens Confronts Benjamin Netanyahu and Bill Ackman Over Charlie Kirk's Final Days and Hampton Meeting Pressure
1:09:54
Zach Costello Defends Open Investigation Into Charlie Kirk Assassination After Heated Paramount Tactical Debate
1:13:41
Zach from WolvesAndFinance Investigates Shocking Evidence Government Is Lying About Charlie Kirk Shooting
Zach from WolvesAndFinance examines the official narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk's shooting and uncovers troubling inconsistencies in the government's case against suspect Tyler Robinson. The prosecution claims they have a murder weapon, video footage, and a text message confession pointing to Robinson as a lone gunman. However, weapons experts question whether the alleged 306 rifle could have caused the wounds described, surveillance footage contains unexplained gaps and contradictions, and key evidence like Discord messages and a written note cannot be verified. With eyewitness testimony contradicting the FBI's description of the shooter and forensic evidence raising serious doubts, Zach argues the case against Robinson has reasonable doubt written all over it. He explores the possibility of accomplices and questions whether the real shooter remains at large.
Tyler Robinson was arrested for Charlie Kirk's shooting and was indicted under seven criminal counts, including murder. The indictment explains that Tyler Robinson was a lone gunman who acted alone. In a message to his lover, he allegedly said, "I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age."
According to the indictment, police found the suspected murder weapon—a bolt-action 306 rifle—nearby. There was also ammunition engraved with transgender ideology. The indictment explains they published photos of the shooter from the UVU surveillance cameras, which led to people recognizing Tyler Robinson and ultimately his arrest.
During this time, police also discovered messages sent from Tyler Robinson where he confesses every element of the crime. The messages describe a note left by Tyler Robinson that read, "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it." He confesses in the messages that he alone did it. He had absolutely no accomplices. He explained where he left the murder weapon, how he engraved the ammo, and why he did it. According to the messages, he killed Charlie Kirk because of love—he did it for his transgender boyfriend who is transitioning to a woman.
At first glance, this looks like a pretty airtight case. They have the murder weapon, video footage, and the text message confession. But examining each of these elements more closely reveals serious problems.
The Murder Weapon Doesn't Match the Wound
Here is a map of the shooting: Charlie Kirk was at one location and the shooter was allegedly on a roof two football fields away. The video of the shooting shows blood bursting out of the front of his neck. The authorities claimed that the murder weapon is a 306 rifle. This is a big gun, and people who are experts in guns immediately started calling this out as unlikely.
Candace Owens has been doing her own investigation. She made the bombshell claim that she has received information that the bullet fragment removed from Charlie Kirk's body was not from a 306. She has not produced evidence of this claim, so we have to be careful because she is saying the exact opposite of law enforcement. Law enforcement is saying that Charlie Kirk was shot with a 306.
Looking at test footage of someone shooting a 306 rifle provides crucial context. The bullet is enormous—a 150 grain bullet with muzzle velocity of 2,910 and energy footpounds at the muzzle of about 2,820. That's a powerhouse. When fired at a gel head that simulates flesh and bone, the results are devastating.
Do you understand why weapons experts think this story is unbelievable? The gunshot wound was not consistent with the damage you would see from a 306. If Charlie Kirk was hit with that massive gun, his head would have exploded. The people standing in the front row would have been covered in gore. Not only that, the bullet would have passed through him and hit the people who were standing behind the tent.
What is even more strange is there is camera footage showing the back of Charlie Kirk's head. Only a handful of people have seen this footage and they have reported that it shows there is no exit wound. This has officially been confirmed by Turning Point USA in a post on X.com. The surgeon who worked on Charlie Kirk said his bone was so healthy and the density was so impressive that he's like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. The coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
They are claiming that this 306 bullet entered Charlie Kirk's neck, hit his bones that acted like steel plates, and stopped the bullet just beneath the skin. Looking at the ballistics test again, this explanation appears to be nonsense. The allegation that the 306 is the murder weapon is false.
Problems with the Video Footage
One of the key points of this case is they claim that they have video and photos of Tyler Robinson committing the murder. TMZ obtained video of the before and after images of the suspect accused of killing Charlie Kirk. The first video shows the suspect walking to the venue in a neighborhood. The person is walking with a limp, and it is believed to be because that person has a rifle in the pants and they are walking with difficulty because of that object inside the pants.
Then there is video after the shooting where the suspect is clearly running in a field. Police and federal authorities examined this footage. There are also new images released by the Utah Department of Public Safety showing clearer photos of the suspect. A $100,000 reward was offered for the capture and arrest of this individual.
But there are several strange things about this footage. The biggest concern is that not all of the footage was released. They only released small portions of the footage. Why are they cutting the footage up and only releasing parts of it? On the photos of the suspect walking up the stairs, why did they release grainy still images and not the actual video footage?
Remember, this was released during the manhunt. Wouldn't they want to release more footage and better quality footage if they wanted the person to be caught? Another problem is that the person was limping in the first video, but he's clearly not limping in the still images. His left leg is bending in one image and his right leg is bending in another image. He is supposed to be limping because he's carrying the gun in his pant leg. But then why would the limp switch to different legs in different pictures?
And why are they not showing the footage of him running across the roof? The FBI cuts off the footage from before the gunshot. Supposedly, there is footage of him on the roof preparing to take the shot, but for some reason, they won't release it. Why are they not releasing it? Because it would show that there is not enough time for him to put the gun together before the shot is fired.
The official story is that Tyler Robinson broke down the rifle, hid it in his pants, got on the roof, put the rifle together with a screwdriver, then jumped off the roof, and hid the gun. In the indictment, they say, "A camera captures the suspect running across the roof carrying an item whose shape is consistent with a rifle." When looking at this footage, it does not look like he's carrying a rifle. It looks like a tiny backpack. It does not look like he's holding a gun. He could not have broken it down because we have the timestamp on the video footage. He starts running at 12:23 p.m. right after the gunshot happens.
Then there is a photo taken from a surveillance camera six hours after the shooting showing Tyler Robinson at a Dairy Queen. When comparing the two images, these are clearly not the same hat. Are we supposed to believe that he took off one black hat to put on another black hat? Why is he wearing a different hat? In fact, these don't even look like the same person. Was the grainy photo even of Tyler Robinson?
What is even more strange is that FBI director Kash Patel was furious at his staff over this specific photo. The New York Times reported that in an online meeting with 200 agents, Kash Patel was incensed that the agents in Salt Lake City waited nearly 12 hours to show him a photo of the suspected killer. This is very strange. Why did the agents wait 12 hours? Was it because they were using that time to doctor the photo and frame Tyler Robinson?
Eyewitness Testimony Contradicts Official Narrative
One of the clearest videos shows someone on a roof, with witnesses pointing him out in real time. In Candace Owens' investigation, she actually spoke with the person who shot that video. This is probably the one eyewitness who had the closest look at the shooter. He immediately went to the police when they were initially arresting the old man on the scene who ended up being the wrong person.
According to Candace Owens' description of what he said: "This is the wrong person. I observed this person with my eyes. You have the complete wrong description. The person you're looking for is wearing tactical gear and is obviously young because I watched him sprint back after taking the shot. I saw this with my own two eyes."
So the defense is going to have an eyewitness that can testify that the person on the roof does not match the FBI's description of Tyler Robinson. This account is verified by other facts. One commenter on YouTube named Kaylee B said: "Candace, that description of the shooter did go out. I was listening to the Utah Valley Public Safety Police Scanner immediately after Charlie was shot, and the description that the witness told you, black pants, black tactical vest, black mask, etc., was exactly the description the dispatcher gave out to the police in the first few hours after Charlie was shot. I'm so glad I recorded it. I'm going to upload it to YouTube or X and tag you. There was some crazy stuff said on the police scanner that day."
Kaylee B did upload the police dispatch recording. The dispatcher says the suspect is "going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans. Continuing attempt to locate active shooter suspect, tactical vest, and a black mask, possibly carrying a rifle."
Why was the description the police were using on that day different from the photo the FBI is now circulating? Someone is lying. With all of these problems, these videos do not prove that Tyler Robinson was the person who was on the roof.
The Unverifiable Discord Messages
These have been widely reported as text messages. This is wrong. These were not text messages. They were Discord messages. If you do not know what Discord is, it's an online social media space where you can send each other messages.
During a press conference, Utah Governor Spencer Cox explained: "Investigators asked if he would show them the messages on Discord. He opened it and showed several messages to investigators and allowed investigators to take photos of the screen as each message was shown by Robinson's roommate. These photos consisted of various messages, including content of messages between the phone contact name Tyler with an emoji icon and Robinson's roommate's device. The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush, messages related to visually watching the area where a rifle was left, and a message referring to having left the rifle wrapped in a towel."
The fact that these were Discord messages means they cannot be verified by cell phone data and they can be easily faked. Anyone could have sent those messages. Not only that, the police have these messages because they used their phone and took a picture of the screen. So they don't even have the actual messages. If we do not have the original messages, there is no way to verify their authenticity.
So when the indictment says the roommate told police that the roommate received messages from Robinson about the shooting and provided those messages to police, that is not exactly what happened. The police took a photograph of the alleged Discord messages. How this stands up as evidence in court is questionable.
The Mysterious Disappearing Note
FBI director Kash Patel gave an interview on Fox News five days after the shooting. He said: "The written note we believe did exist and we have evidence to show what was in that note which is—and I'm going to summarize—basically saying the suspect wrote a note saying I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it. That note was written before the shooting. Evidence of its existence we now have learned existed before the shooting, was in the location in the suspect and partner's home, but we have since learned that the note even though it has been destroyed we have found forensic evidence of the note and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI."
So now the note doesn't exist. They claim they have evidence of the note. Is this another photograph from someone's phone of this alleged note? Just like the messages, if we do not have the original note, there's no way to verify its authenticity. It sounds like there is no real evidence that these messages ever happened.
There are many reasons why people think the messages are fake. Here's one big reason: The messages talk specifically about the engraved bullets. The messages are mostly a big meme. We have already established that it is unlikely that Charlie Kirk was shot with one of those 306 bullets. So if the bullets were fake, that means that the text messages are also fake.
The Prosecution's Crumbling Case
Let's review the prosecution's case: The murder weapon is false. The video footage is false. And the text message confession is false. It's difficult to see how they're going to win this case against Tyler Robinson. Maybe they have additional evidence, but then why have they not released any of it? All the evidence they released so far doesn't prove anything.
In the United States, in a criminal trial, you have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That means if the jury even has a little doubt, they are going to find him innocent. There is a lot of doubt. They haven't even proved this guy was on campus.
To be clear, Tyler Robinson was likely involved somehow, but he probably was not the person who pulled the trigger. He probably was not on the roof. The evidence shows that the lone gunman theory is not correct, and there are likely other people involved.
Kash Patel has partially confirmed this with his post on X.com saying, "We are meticulously investigating theories and questions, including the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message confession, and related conversations." So he acknowledges that they are still investigating other people involved.
The Danger Ahead
Here is the concern: If someone else committed the murder, there is worry that someone is going to try and kill Tyler Robinson before he gets to trial. If they have already killed Charlie Kirk, what is to stop them from killing again?
There's a lot more to this story, but it is clear that what the FBI is telling us is not correct. Charlie Kirk deserves the truth. Some people don't want anyone to criticize the ongoing investigation, but it doesn't do Charlie Kirk any good if we convict the wrong person for his murder. If there is another accomplice who actually took the shot, we need to uncover who that is. People need to continue to investigate what happened so that Charlie Kirk can get justice.
