Up Next

Patrick Bet-David and Panel Analyze Evidence Suggesting Charlie Kirk Was Shot from Behind by a Second Shooter

Patrick Bet-David and Panel Analyze Evidence Suggesting Charlie Kirk Was Shot from Behind by a Second Shooter

13:34

Dr. Chris Martinson Exposes Major Problems with the Official Charlie Kirk Murder Investigation and Tyler Robinson Narrative

Dr. Chris Martinson Exposes Major Problems with the Official Charlie Kirk Murder Investigation and Tyler Robinson Narrative

54:10

The Charlie Kirk Assassination: Why Millions Still Question the Official Narrative Seven Months Later

The Charlie Kirk Assassination: Why Millions Still Question the Official Narrative Seven Months Later

28:48

RangeDayBro Investigates the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Text Messages, Missing Evidence, and Unanswered Questions

Categories: Investigation
September 20, 2025

RangeDayBro continues his investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination at Utah Valley University, examining the suspicious text messages allegedly sent by shooter Tyler Robinson, questioning the destruction of evidence at the crime scene, and analyzing ballistic inconsistencies in the official narrative. Despite warnings from friends and family to stop asking questions, he breaks down why the case against Robinson doesn't add up, from the grammatically strange text exchanges that read like they were written by law enforcement, to the premature construction at the shooting site, to the curious behavior of a Turning Point USA employee removing camera footage. This detailed analysis covers everything from the rifle setup to the timeline inconsistencies that have internet investigators dismantling what many see as a poorly constructed official story.

Standing for Truth Despite the Warnings

RangeDayBro opens this episode by addressing the backlash he's received from both sides of the political aisle for his continued investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. Friends, family members, and close associates have warned him that he's walking a dangerous road, telling him to stay in his lane with gun content and reminding him that it's always the tall blades of grass that get cut down. But these warnings have only confirmed to him that he's asking the right questions. He believes this pursuit of truth is what Americans owe to Charlie Kirk and to themselves, regardless of the personal cost.

The investigation has reached a critical point with Tyler Robinson now officially charged and appearing in court. RangeDayBro notes the bizarre nature of Robinson's court appearance—the shooter sat completely stoic in a bulletproof vest, showing no emotion even when the death penalty was mentioned. Perhaps most telling: Robinson has no attorney, his family isn't providing one, and he claims he can't afford legal representation, leaving him with a public defender.

The Crime Scene That Wasn't Protected

One of the most disturbing pieces of footage RangeDayBro examines shows a Turning Point USA employee, shortly after the shooting while people are still milling around, moving Charlie Kirk's chair and removing a camera that had been positioned directly behind Kirk. This camera would have captured crucial evidence—the perspective of the crowd, the potential entry and exit wounds, and the trajectory of the shot. The fact that this wasn't immediately secured as evidence in what should have been an active crime scene raises serious questions about evidence tampering.

Even more concerning, construction began at the exact location where Kirk was shot within a day or two of the incident. Workers were already laying pavers around the area, including near a mysterious trapdoor that sits exactly where Kirk was sitting. RangeDayBro questions why the site wasn't preserved and treated like a crime scene until after a verdict had been reached and justice served.

Ballistic Analysis: The 30-06 Question

RangeDayBro provides detailed ballistic analysis using his experience and a friend's sporterized Mauser rifle similar to the one allegedly used in the shooting. He explains that a 180-grain 30-06 round traveling at approximately 2,600-2,700 feet per second should have caused catastrophic damage to Kirk's neck—far more than the relatively small wound that was visible in footage. For comparison, a 30-06 fires a bullet that's triple the grain weight of a standard 5.56 round.

He demonstrates that the distance from the entry point to exit point on Kirk's neck—approximately 4.5 to 5 inches of tissue—isn't enough for most bullets to properly expand and create the mushroom effect that causes maximum damage. This could explain why the exit wound appeared smaller than expected, but it still doesn't fully account for the lack of catastrophic tissue damage one would expect from such a powerful round at only 142 yards.

Using the sporterized Mauser, RangeDayBro also addresses claims that the scope mounting on Robinson's rifle explains why it was positioned so far back. He demonstrates that even with the traditional three-position Mauser safety (fire, safe, and bolt-lock), the scope would still interfere with the safety lever due to the magnification ring. The mounting on the alleged murder weapon remains inconsistent with proper shooting form, especially when compared to photos of Robinson holding his .22 Ruger with correct eye relief.

The Text Messages That Read Like a Script

The most damning evidence against the official narrative may be the alleged text exchange between Tyler Robinson and his roommate. RangeDayBro methodically breaks down why these messages appear to be fabricated by law enforcement rather than genuine communication between two young people:

The language is completely wrong for the demographic. Robinson allegedly writes "vehicle" repeatedly instead of "car," uses terms like "squad car" and "drop point," and refers to his father as "my old man"—phrasing that sounds like law enforcement jargon, not how a 22-year-old would text.

The grammar switches inconsistently. At one point, Robinson uses proper punctuation and complete sentences, then suddenly adds 15+ question marks and writes "You're joking, right????" in an apparent attempt to sound young and emotional.

The messages conveniently narrate the entire crime. Robinson allegedly admits to the murder, explains his motive ("I had enough of his hatred"), establishes premeditation ("a bit over a week"), describes where he hid the rifle ("in a bush where I changed outfits"), and even addresses the scope mounting controversy ("I guess my grandpa's gun does just fine").

The internal contradictions are glaring. Robinson claims he "hoped to keep this a secret till I died of old age," yet he left a handwritten note under his keyboard and then immediately confessed via text message—creating a permanent digital record that would be read by authorities and the world.

The messages end with Robinson giving his roommate legal advice: "Don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If they ask you any questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent." This reads like instructions written by someone familiar with legal proceedings, not a panicked 22-year-old who just committed murder.

The Dairy Queen Photo and Timeline Problems

At 6:38 PM, Robinson was photographed at a Dairy Queen approximately 15-17 minutes away from campus. In the photo, he's wearing a curious combination: jeans and the maroon shirt from the morning, creating a 50/50 mix of his alleged outfit changes. He's showing his face (partially), appears completely calm, and seems content enough to stop for food after allegedly killing someone.

The timeline creates problems. According to the text messages, Robinson was supposedly near his rifle stash, worried about a "squad car" parked nearby, unable to retrieve the weapon. Yet he had time to drive 15 minutes away, order food, eat, and be photographed looking relaxed. The text exchange claims he changed outfits completely, but the photo shows he only changed his shirt—making the elaborate outfit change story seem unnecessary and fabricated.

Other Anomalies and Conspiracy Theories

RangeDayBro examines several other curious elements, including drone footage that allegedly shows a fast-moving object (potentially an FPV drone) flying across the venue during or after the shooting. He notes it could be a bird, but the speed suggests otherwise.

He discusses the book titled "The Shooting of Charlie Kirk" that was published on September 9th, 2025—one day before the actual assassination. The book provides an "in-depth humanized account" of the shooting at Utah Valley University with specific details about the event. This has been verified through internet archives, yet no mainstream media or FBI has addressed this extremely suspicious timing.

There's also speculation about a photo in Robinson's dorm room showing Goat Island in New Zealand, which some claim is the location of a resort called Valhalla used by the FBI for witness protection. Kash Patel's statement ending with "See you in Valhalla" has fueled this theory, though RangeDayBro notes this is a common saying among military and law enforcement personnel.

RangeDayBro also addresses an eyewitness—a young Turning Point USA worker—who began giving his account of seeing Kirk "slump forward" (contradicting video evidence showing Kirk slumping backward). Before he could continue, several people rushed over, told him "we're not doing this right now," and physically stopped him from speaking. The reason for silencing this eyewitness remains unclear.

The Rifle and Scope Controversy

The alleged murder weapon—a sporterized Mauser in 30-06 with a scope that appeared to cost around $2,000—has been the subject of much debate. RangeDayBro uses a similar Turkish Mauser action rifle chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor to demonstrate proper scope mounting and rifle setup. The comparison shows that Robinson's rifle had the scope mounted improperly, too far back, and in a position that would make accurate shooting difficult.

The rifle was also bedded, a process using marine-grade epoxy to create a perfect fit between the barreled action and stock for extreme accuracy and consistency. This level of customization suggests the rifle belonged to someone who took shooting seriously—supposedly Robinson's grandfather, who gifted him the weapon. Yet Robinson allegedly left this family heirloom wrapped in a towel in some bushes, a detail he conveniently narrated in the text messages.

Why RangeDayBro Continues Despite the Risks

RangeDayBro emphasizes that he's simply asking questions and seeking truth—activities that should never be dangerous in America. The First Amendment protects exactly this kind of inquiry. The fact that he's receiving warnings and experiencing persecution for asking questions only confirms to him that he's on the right track. He sees this as a duty owed to Charlie Kirk, to the American people, and to his faith in God and Jesus Christ.

The internet community of investigators has been instrumental in finding inconsistencies and holes in the official narrative. RangeDayBro shares a meme showing "CIA director watching everyone dismantle their billion-dollar psyops with low-effort memes," which perfectly captures the current situation. When citizens armed with basic logic, screenshots, and public information can find more inconsistencies than professional investigators are addressing, something is deeply wrong.

Conclusion: More Questions Than Answers

As RangeDayBro wraps up this investigation update, the official story continues to fall apart under scrutiny. The text messages read like they were written by middle-aged law enforcement trying to sound like Gen Z. The crime scene was contaminated almost immediately. The ballistics don't quite add up. A book about the shooting was published the day before it happened. And crucial evidence—like the camera footage from behind Charlie Kirk—was removed by unauthorized personnel before proper investigation could occur.

RangeDayBro maintains that whether people agree with his conclusions or not, the pursuit of truth through questioning should be celebrated, not suppressed. He encourages viewers to examine the evidence themselves, think critically, and never stop asking questions—even when it's inconvenient or uncomfortable for those in power.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!