Up Next
Brandi and Billie Expose Shocking Conflicts of Interest in Charlie Kirk Investigation
1:38:44
Candace Owens Exposes Turning Point USA's Debate Disaster With Andrew Wilson
1:29:06
Zach Costello Defends Open Investigation Into Charlie Kirk Assassination After Heated Paramount Tactical Debate
1:13:41
Alex Jones Reacts to Candace Owens Demolishing Andrew Wilson in Charlie Kirk Debate
Alex Jones provides his analysis of the debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson regarding the Charlie Kirk case. Jones praises Owens' performance, calling it a decisive victory, particularly highlighting the moment when Wilson failed to name the charges against Tyler Robinson while Owens recited all seven from memory. Jones also shares his perspective on the case, revealing that Kirk personally contacted him multiple times before his death, and discusses the theory that the official narrative doesn't add up, pointing to suspicious actions by authorities including the rapid destruction of evidence.
Alex Jones Declares Candace Owens the Clear Winner
Alex Jones shared his thoughts on the debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson about the Charlie Kirk case, hosted by Patrick Bet-David. Jones, who watched the debate after finishing his syndicated show, declared that Owens "slaughtered" Wilson in the exchange. He specifically highlighted what he considered the most defining moment of the debate: when Owens challenged Wilson to name the charges against Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter, and Wilson couldn't do it.
Jones noted that while he was familiar with Wilson's debate tactics from previous encounters, including debates with Jones' own son and appearances on Joe Rogan's show, Wilson was completely outmatched in this instance. According to Jones, Wilson typically relies on appeals to emotion and confident presentation, which work when he's debating topics where he's on the right side. However, against Owens' preparation and knowledge of the case, these tactics failed spectacularly.
The Pivotal Moment: Naming the Charges
The exchange that Jones highlighted as most damaging to Wilson began when Owens asked him to name the charges against Tyler Robinson. Wilson stammered and tried various debate tactics to avoid answering directly, first attempting to flip the question back to Owens, then claiming he knew the charges "of course" but wanted them listed to be sure. When pressed, Wilson could only offer "murder" as an answer, which Owens immediately corrected as incorrect.
Owens then proceeded to list all seven charges in order: aggravated murder, felony discharge of a weapon, two counts of obstruction of justice, two counts of witness tampering, and violence in front of a minor. She took her time explaining why the distinction between "murder" and "aggravated murder" mattered significantly, noting that aggravated murder is narrowly defined and carries a death sentence in Utah.
Throughout this exchange, Wilson attempted to pressure Owens with time constraints and interruptions, classic debate tactics designed to rattle opponents. Owens remained calm and composed, even taking a moment to explain to Wilson that "your strategy of thinking that people are intimidated when you try to put a time constraint doesn't work and you'll be better the next time you debate someone." This measured response, delivered without anger or defensiveness, demonstrated complete control of the situation.
The Phone Check Challenge
Adding to Wilson's embarrassment, he suggested that Owens might have been texted the question about the charges, implying she had outside help during the debate. Owens immediately offered to let him check her phone, pulling it out of her purse and handing it over to Patrick Bet-David. No such communication was found, further undermining Wilson's credibility and showing that Owens' knowledge came from genuine study and preparation, not assistance during the debate.
Reaction from the Debate Community
The analysis included reaction footage from Destiny, a prominent left-wing debate personality who has previously debated Wilson. Even Destiny, who would typically be ideologically opposed to someone like Owens, recognized the moment as a "great gotcha" and acknowledged the devastating nature of the exchange. His reaction showed Wilson's confusion and desperate attempts to recover, calling it potentially "one of the most expensive debates on the planet" given that Wilson was reportedly paid $300,000 for his participation.
Destiny's commentary highlighted how unusual it was for someone to accept such a high-profile, well-compensated debate while being so poorly prepared to defend their position. He compared it unfavorably to other high-stakes debates, suggesting this might rank among the most expensive debate performances in history, making Wilson's lack of preparation all the more inexplicable.
Alex Jones' Perspective on the Case
Beyond commenting on the debate performance, Jones shared his own views on the Charlie Kirk case. He pointed out several inconsistencies in the official narrative, including the claim that Tyler Robinson assembled a .30-06 rifle with a telescopic scope on the roof and immediately made an accurate shot. Jones, drawing on his knowledge of firearms, explained that when you attach a telescopic scope, even if it was previously sighted in, it typically won't "hit the paper at 100 yards" without adjustment.
Jones also referenced video evidence showing approximately 30 seconds of footage, which he argues isn't enough time to assemble a rifle in the manner described. He mentioned that according to reports he broke months before mainstream confirmation, Kash Patel told a cabinet meeting seven days after Kirk's death that on orders from the president, they were not investigating foreign involvement or threats from groups that had publicly stated Kirk "will be dead when he comes to town tomorrow."
Additionally, Jones highlighted suspicious actions by authorities, including the governor and FBI ordering construction crews to rapidly tear up and destroy concrete in the days following the incident. He questioned why there would be such urgency to destroy potential evidence if there was nothing to hide.
Personal Connection to Charlie Kirk
Jones revealed that Charlie Kirk had personally contacted him multiple times in the month before his death. According to Jones, Kirk called to praise him for "pushing" on the Israel-Iran issue and the "Israel first lobby," telling Jones the lobby was "out of control." Kirk also encouraged Jones to "keep pressing" on exposing the Epstein connections and suggested Trump shouldn't be covering that up.
Jones emphasized that these phone calls and text messages are documented in his records, showing Kirk thanking him for his coverage of these sensitive topics. This personal connection adds weight to Jones' interest in the case and his skepticism about the official narrative.
Theories About What Really Happened
While Jones made clear he doesn't believe old friends of Charlie or his wife were involved in any conspiracy ("It's not how this stuff works"), he did mention that some have speculated about a high-level operation to place Kirk in witness protection. Jones stated he has "no idea" what the truth is but knows something doesn't add up about the official story. He pointed out that the text messages from a high-level TPUSA member to Harrison Smith, sent a month before Kirk's death, mentioned that Israel was "coming after him" because of his stance against the war.
Jones concluded by noting that regardless of whether every detail Candace Owens has investigated is correct, or whether every "rabbit trail" they've gone down has been accurate, the fundamental issue remains: the official story is not true, and the system has lost credibility with the public. This loss of trust, according to Jones, is why people don't buy the official narrative.
Video Transcript
defined and because it carries a death
sentence. I'm not I'm going to answer
the question. You're just going to
recognize that your strategy of thinking
that people are intimidated when you try
to put a time constraint doesn't work
and you'll be better the next time you
debate someone.
>> it. I got it. Give me Give me the
She's going slow not because she doesn't
know, it's because she knows she's
bleeding you out in front of the world
right here. She wants to make sure that
you don't rush her through it. She gets
to enjoy every second of it and you are
conscious the entire time.
So, that's why she did it slow.
In addition to that, once she had pretty
much bled you out right in front of
everyone, you were like, "I'm hanging on
to life."
Did she get text messaged that question
and it's like, "Okay." Well, now she's
going to
your body. So, let's watch that as well.
All right, so the aftermath from the
debate continues and in this video we
are going to be looking at the king of
debating
not not really actually not really a
stick but Alex Jones has some thoughts
about what happened in that debate and
I'm sure you guys are curious what he
thinks since there was some kind of
perceived beef between him and Candace
you know, whenever I don't know within
the last 6 months.
That for the record though, if you know
Alex and I do, he has been very clear
with me and on many episodes that I've
watched that he has absolutely no
problem with Candace at all and it was a
misunderstanding but um
but yeah, so let's uh
whoa, let's see let's see what he
thought about last night's shellacking.
All right, here we go. Alex, take it
away.
>> Candace Owens today decisively defeated
Andrew Wilson, the
champion of the TPUSA put forward in the
Charlie Kirk assassination cover-up
debate
hosted by Patrick Bet-David.
I did my regular syndicated show today
11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and so I
couldn't watch it then. but once I got
off air, I watched it.
And she slaughtered him.
Absolutely slaughtered him.
Now, I've seen Mosab before, and he's
debated my son. I saw him on Rogan, was
familiar with him.
>> Alex Jones' son, how do I not How have I
never seen Alex Jones' son stuff?
I need to make that a priority.
>> And I've seen his tactics. A lot was
appeal to emotion. He acts confident.
That's what he does. All the time he's
debating a topic where he's on the right
side, so he wins the debate because he's
in the right.
But she destroyed him.
And I'm going to post right here with
the same post here where Alex shows on
X.
The most defining moment
where he got annihilated. She says,
"Hey, name me the charges
against the supposed assassin
of Charlie Kirk."
And he couldn't name it.
She then in the order of the charges
listed,
and they pull it up on ChatGPT, and she
nailed it word for word with
photographic memory.
And he says, "Oh, you were using your
phone, I think.
You're on your phone." And she reaches
over to her purse and pulls it out and
gives the paper to David. And there were
no texts about it to her.
>> I think what we should actually do,
guys, is let's all experience that
moment together. All right, so we're
going to go ahead and watch that clip
right here, okay?
And uh
>> When you pulled out your phone just
before you asked that question?
>> absolutely glorious. So, I'm going to
minimize myself and let you guys
experience it in all of its glory.
And we obviously are going to be pausing
it throughout because it's so amazing.
>> Did somebody by chance text you that
question?
>> You can check my phone. I'm just
curious. No, you can absolutely not. I
didn't I have not had one communication
with a single person, not even my
producers who are in there this whole
time we were here. You want to check my
phone? I'm happy to do it. If I may ask
a question, is is that allowed or
permitted?
>> Go ahead.
>> Um just so I also have clarity
>> By the way,
contractually,
she was not allowed to ask questions
last night, it sounds like. Cuz that's
normal.
That sounds like a debate.
Sounds like a nice conversation I would
like to take part in.
>> Okay, since your basis has been
evidentiary, you keep saying that you
have evidence or like you are following
evidence,
which one of the charges against or or
all of them do you think Tyler Robinson
is guilty of?
>> Um the specific charge?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah, so I think what I think is that
um
Tyler Robinson shot [snorts] Charlie
Kirk.
>> Yeah, but of the seven charges that he's
he's being charged with.
>> Yeah, can we list them real quick? I'll
tell you exactly which ones. We'll pull
them up.
>> Well, do you do you know any of the
charges he's he's up for right now?
>> Yeah, of course, but I want to make sure
>> Oh.
Really?
Of course, he says. Of course, I know
which ones they are. Oh, you do?
So, like in real time, you're
recognizing that if you don't know the
charges, your contention that
your opinion matters on this case would
be completely nullified, and you will
lose this debate by default.
So, of course, you know them.
He Did you like That's a perfect moment
to watch cuz this guy what he's good at
is putting pressure on people when he is
questioning them and putting the and
he's in the driver's seat. This guy
folds under pressure, though.
Straight up.
You put him under pressure, he folds.
You make him a little bit mad, he folds.
And this might right here, he knew.
He knew that she had him, and he tried
to navigate his way out of it. He says,
"Yeah, of course, you know, okay, let's
list them." Like, those are tactics that
he was trying to employ, and Candace is
way smarter than him. Well, oh, no, no,
no, yeah, yeah, yeah. Wait, I'm sorry.
Yes, she's way smarter than him.
but that's not why this didn't work.
It's because she knows all of these
debate tactics and so she was prepared
for him is what I meant to say. She's
also smarter than him, obviously.
But uh
This is literally like a slow motion
drowning right here. Sure that we have
them listed.
>> Yeah, but but like that's Can you name
one because my my general perspective is
that you don't actually care about this
case. You're not following the case.
>> That's the That's the question. You're
just not following it enough.
>> pretty like if you're going to engage
and you're going to say the evidence is
overwhelming that Tyler Robinson is
guilty, I just think that you should
like can you tell me one
>> let's do the
Guilty of what, dude? You know what I
mean?
Like you said it's overwhelming that
he's guilty. Guilty of
what? Because you're in a position
You're You're in an authority position
on this case, right? You want to
question what I'm doing on this. You
want to question the investigation I'm
doing. So, tell me specifically which
charge you think that he's guilty of or
why don't you just tell me if you think
he's guilty of all of them. Let's go
through one by one. Oh, you don't know
them. Okay, how about just the first
one?
Oh, you don't know that one. So, what on
Earth could you possibly know about this
case and how would you possibly be in a
position to question me or what I'm
doing investigating the case, guy?
All right.
You can really Hang on. This is a great
gotcha.
>> You just got to ask me, play clips out
of context, put me in the hot seat. So,
please just answer the question.
>> Name all seven since you've been
following the case.
>> Okay, sure. You name You name one.
>> Another attempt. That's just a debate
tactic. He's trying to flip it back on
her. Why don't you name all seven?
Trying to do anything he can to avoid
having to answer this question cuz he
does not know.
>> one
>> Yeah, you name all seven.
>> I'm happy to do that, but can you name
one?
>> I think he's I think he's been charged
with murder.
>> That's actually incorrect.
>> Okay, great. Now, name all seven.
>> He doesn't [laughter] even This is like
>> Name all seven.
>> And and and I I
>> name all seven?
>> I I can't.
>> Then do it.
>> Sure. You don't have to put your
>> Now, do it. I'll count them. Go ahead.
>> You don't have to put your fingers up. I
can do that. Hang
>> them.
>> Yeah, sure.
>> Name them.
>> Uh the first charge is aggravated murder
because that's what carries the death
sentence in the state of you. No, that's
not That is literally not murder.
>> Okay.
>> And so just so people No, don't I don't
have to do it in a time limit. There's
nothing going on. And just to explain to
people the difference of why that really
matters and shows that he doesn't
actually care about this at all is
because aggravated murder it's it's
narrowly defined and because it carries
a death sentence. I'm not I'm going to
answer the question. I'm just going to
recognize that your strategy of thinking
that people are intimidated when you try
to put a time constraint doesn't work
and you'll be better the next time you
debate someone.
>> it. I got it. Give me Give me the other
ones.
This is
a merciless destruction right here. And
you have to understand
every bit of what she's doing is
calculated and intentional.
I took my sunglasses off because uh
that's kind of what my thing. I just
want to make clear.
Generally speaking, if I'm wearing
sunglasses it's cuz I'm going to be
funny. If I have my sunglasses off, I'm
going to be serious. And in general
terms
people probably think that she's just
doing what she this like he and he's the
one that's implementing the tactics and
it's not accurate. It's partially
accurate. He's doing the tactics, but
she's implementing strategy.
And so she knows that a huge part of
this debate is going to be how do you
come off? Like do you come off like uh
unhinged person? Do you come off Do you
come off uh calm? Do you come off
humble? Do you come off overconfident?
Do you You know what I mean? And in that
moment right there, she literally just
punked him so hard. She punked him so
hard right there. She said, "I'm just
trying to show you that your debate
tactics are not going to work and you'll
be better next time you debate someone."
Calm and cool as ice. And she's built
out of fire. You understand that. Like
the
amazing.
>> If the more you cut me off, the longer
I'll take. Do you want to just wait for
me to finish of why that's a big
difference, so that people don't walk
away.
>> the charges.
>> Yeah, I'm going to do that. You just
don't get to pretend that there's a time
constraint for me to do that.
>> Well, how how long does it take you to
list seven charges?
>> I'm cuz I'm speaking. You just got to
>> like you're just delaying it cuz you
don't know them.
>> I I know all seven of them, and I'm
going to say again, cuz I you're going
to get embarrassed. I you don't have to
rush this. I'm also showing an example
of a very flawed debate strategy. I
actually have no time constraint.
>> got one.
>> Great. The second charge is the felony
discharge of a weapon.
Uh the next two charges are for
obstruction of justice.
>> Okay.
>> The next two charges are for witness
tampering. And the final
>> specific charges though?
>> That is them. Obstruction of justice,
obstruction of justice, witness
tampering, witness tampering.
>> Okay, and there's no other specifics to
them.
>> Well, we I can tell you why he's being
charged with
>> no, just the [clears throat] the charges
and then seven?
>> Yeah, see the bad thing is when you try
to be an A-hole and it doesn't work.
>> What's the seventh?
>> The last charge is violent in front of a
minor.
>> Now, real quick, if you guys don't mind
subscribing to the channel, liking this
video, it'll help me, it'll help
Candace, and it'll probably help Andrew,
maybe, I don't know. But if you like the
video, tell your friends. I appreciate
you, and hit the bell, so you know when
I upload. Okay, got it. So, then, he's
being charged with murder. You just say
aggravated murder.
So, now he is putting on a brave face
and trying to act like what just
happened is not the death of his entire
debate.
I don't even know. Like,
that is so decisive right there. And
he's so he's that Oh, so you're you
know, you're saying murder you're saying
aggravated murder. You're like, do you
think that this is a good angle here,
dude?
She just explained in one sentence why
there is a massive difference between
murder and aggravated murder, especially
in this case, because it carries the
death penalty.
Okay? [snorts]
To try to minimize that and go, "Oh,
it's
it's just showing that
every time that you take a snide
attitude like that, it's nothing but a
tactic or you just are the biggest
[ __ ] on Earth, which is probably
both.
But,
she knew all of them. I have no idea
what he what he was thinking. This is
what I'm saying, okay?
There are people who are going to be
putting on pressure and they're good at
people who are good at at you know,
maintaining composure and dealing with
pressure, right? I am actually not super
fond of putting pressure on people, but
I hold up real strong under pressure.
Real strong. I don't like debating
people and [ __ ] but like you're going
to have you're it's going to be a very,
very, very hard like search to find any
clip of me where like someone puts it
and I'm like, "Oh, shit."
You know what I mean? But, I'm not that
good at that kind of like [ __ ]
pressure either. Like that's I I don't
like doing it. It makes me feel
uncomfortable. I don't like to do that
stuff.
But, uh that's totally irrelevant to
this conversation anyway. I don't even
know why I brought it up. I was just
self-assessing and it just came out of
my mouth.
But, with uh with Andrew, he's the exact
I mean, literally, he that this is such
a this is such a choke moment where he
says he challenged her to name all
seven. Why would he think she wouldn't
know those?
Like why on Earth like okay, you don't
know them. Okay, so you're panicking.
So, it's like, "Okay, well, maybe I can
get out of this if she doesn't know
them." And it's like, "Why would you
think she wouldn't know them? What if
she does, guy?
What if she knows them? Of course she's
going to know them. Do you not
understand she's focused on nothing but
this case for a year? Me too.
You think that I didn't know those
charges? Of course I knew those charges.
That's my point is these guys that are
like on the outside like, "Oh my god,
these conspiracy theories, whatever,
blah blah blah." The idea that we would
have not known what he's charged with is
laughable. You don't know [ __ ] about
this case. Nothing. Okay?
If if it's a if the people who are still
over there like, you know, yelling
about, "Oh my god, the conspiracy, blah
blah blah blah." I'm telling you, you
don't know anything about the [ __ ]
case, man. You don't.
Bottom line, you don't.
If that's still your position. I'm not
saying that,
you know, anyone hit Charlie with a
direct energy weapon from whatever,
although my theory is probably sounds
just as crazy to regular folks,
but it's irrelevant.
You're not in a position to argue with
us. You're just not. You don't know the
[ __ ] case.
And this is where he really made it
worse.
>> That's the distinction. You just want to
>> It's a massive It's like you can't even
You cannot say murder versus aggravated
murder. This gets
>> to the [clears throat] entire crux of
why him being up up for the death
sentence. And I actually find the
defense's filing about why this is not
aggravated to be uh
very compelling of why it's not.
>> So, I don't want to show the whole clip
cuz I want to go back to Alex, but
bottom line is,
like,
he challenges her on whether or not she
uh
she was sent
uh whether or not she was sent that
question.
And when they search her phone, she
wasn't. And so, he gets like triple
embarrassed, you know.
Here's Destiny's Destiny's reaction to
it, too, which is classic because
Destiny and Andrew have That's all
That's the only reason I knew who Andrew
Wilson was is because I saw him debate
Destiny.
And I'm going to make a confession,
dude. God damn it. I can't believe I'm
going to do this.
I can't do it with my sunglasses off.
Ah.
I kind of like Destiny, dude. He's
obnoxious. He says terrible things.
But I think it's a game to him. I will
acknowledge that. And when I watch him,
I have always found him likable, which
is crazy cuz he tries to to as unlikable
as possible. And he's huge creep.
But I don't know. I can't explain it,
dude.
But [ __ ] him. You know what I mean? But
let's watch this.
>> Do you know any of the charges he's he's
up for right now?
>> Yeah, of course. But I want to make sure
that we have them listed.
>> No.
>> And if you don't know who Destiny is, he
is one of the like he is like the the
quintessential
left-wing debate bro.
The whole debate thing is so lame, dude.
It's so lame, dude.
It's like uh
it's like a cop, you know, for people
who are like, "Yeah, I like to crush
people." But they're like not able to
like actually crush people, you know?
But uh
his opinion on a debate actually matters
to the internet.
>> Like that's Do you Can you name one?
Because my my general perspective is
that you don't actually care about this
case. You're not following the case.
>> That's the
>> I mean like that's a fair thing to say.
>> The question is you're just not
following it enough.
>> pretty like if you're going to engage
you're going to say the evidence is
overwhelming that Tyler Robinson is
guilty. I just think that you should
>> Can you tell me one charge that he's up
>> You can really Yeah, you know, this is a
great gotcha.
>> you just got to ask me play clips out of
context. Put me in the hot seat. So,
please just answer the question.
>> It's a great gotcha. What charge do you
think he's guilty of? Oh, huge [ __ ]
gotcha, dude.
It's literally like, "Can you Can you
recite your ABCs?" He's like, "Uh no. I
want to hear you do your ABCs
backwards." She's like, "I can. Can you
do Can you give me one of the letters?"
He's all, "Uh
sure. Z."
She's like, "Oh Oh, we're doing it
backwards?" He's all, "Wait, what?"
She's all, "Uh I don't know. I meant Q."
He's all,
"What are we doing here?" He's all, "I
don't know." She's like, "Do you even
know your ABCs, dude?"
[ __ ] embarrassing.
>> Name all seven since you've been
following the case.
>> Okay, sure. You name You name one.
>> Yeah, you name all seven.
>> I'm happy to do that, but can you name
one?
>> Uh I think he's I think he's been
charged with murder.
>> That's actually not right.
>> Okay, great. Now, name all seven.
>> He'll be more qualified probably, right?
And I don't know if even for this
particular one would, yeah.
>> Doesn't even This is like
>> Name all seven.
>> And and and I I
I can't
>> Then do it.
>> Sure, you don't have to
>> Do it. No, do it. I'll count them. Go
ahead.
>> You don't have to put your fingers up
like that.
>> Okay, now name them.
>> Yeah, sure.
>> Name them.
>> Uh the first charge is aggravated murder
because that's what carries the death
sentence in that's
>> That's going to be a qualifier, yeah.
>> That is literally not murder. And so
just so people know, don't I don't have
to do it in a time limit. There's
nothing going on. I just explain to
people the difference of why that really
matters.
>> Like, if she could even get like five of
them, it looks so bad. Why would he feel
confident? She asked the question. Why
would he think that she would ask a
question like that that she wouldn't be
able to answer? That's because that's
the thing that Andrew would do. Maybe
she can't though, because she is acting
a little bit, you know, she just seems
like she's not trying to answer the
question. But if she if she can, if she
could even get five of them, oh no.
>> It shows that he doesn't actually care
about this at all. It's because
aggravated murder uh it's it's narrowly
defined and because it carries a death
sentence. I'm not I'm going to answer
the question. I'm just going to
recognize that your strategy of thinking
that people are intimidated when
>> She's dragging it out to gut you slow,
guy.
Okay?
She's dragging it out to gut you nice
and slow. That's why.
It's not because she doesn't know it.
She wants to make sure that as she
bleeds you out in front of the world,
you are conscious the entire time. That
is why she's doing it the way that she's
doing it. All right, let's finish this
thing.
>> You try to put a time constraint,
doesn't work. And you'll be better the
next time you do
>> it. I got it. Give me Give me the other
one.
>> The more you cut me off, the longer I'll
take. Do you want to just wait for me to
finish up why that's a big difference
>> I just want you to list the charges.
>> Yeah, I'm going to do that. You just
don't get to pretend there's a time
constraint for me to do that.
>> Well, how how long does it take you to
list seven charges?
>> I'm cuz I'm speaking. You just got to It
sounds like you're just delaying it cuz
you I I know all seven of them and I'm
going to say it again cuz like you're
going to get embarrassed. I you don't
have to rush this. I'm also showing an
example of a very flawed debate
strategy. I actually have no time
constraint.
>> I got one.
>> Great. The second charge is the felony
discharge of a weapon. Uh the next two
charges are for obstruction of justice.
>> Okay.
>> The next two charges are for witness
tampering.
>> What are the specific charges though?
>> That is them. Obstruction
>> That's the charge that that's going to
be the charge. USC whatever [ __ ] Or
it might be written in It's not going to
be um
It won't be citing federal statutes,
probably. It's going to be citing Utah
statutes or whatever, but that that
would probably be the
>> That's obstruction of justice, witness
tampering, witness tampering.
>> Okay, and there's no other specifics to
them.
>> Well, we I can tell you why he's being
charged
>> No, no, no, just
>> [laughter]
>> Oh, no. Say the charges and then seven.
>> Yeah, you see the bad thing is when you
try to be an A-hole it doesn't work.
>> What's the seven?
>> The last charge is uh violence in front
of a minor.
>> Oh, no, Andrew.
>> [screaming]
>> Time to leave. This is where you start
coughing and you say I have stage four
lung cancer. Sorry, guys. I'm gone from
the internet. Oh, no. Oh, man.
>> See?
He's funny, dude. He's objectively
clever.
He's a little [ __ ]
but clever. This is where you say I have
stage four cancer and just leave the
internet.
>> [laughter]
>> Okay, got it. So, then he's being
charged with murder.
>> [laughter]
>> This might be the most expensive mommy
dommy pay for play in the history of all
the internet. I will pay you $300,000
to dom me live in front of 1 million
people.
You've got everything you could ever
want. She's smarter, the race play
angle, he's married, so the
Rachel [ __ ] queening like like this is
just it is unbelievable to me that he
would have done this debate for such a
high amount of money. This might be the
one of the most expensive debates on the
planet, technically historically
speaking. How often do people even get
paid to do debates, right? Even that Ru
claim one we watched was for 100k, which
might have been the most expensive
debate on the planet at that time. This
might be the most expensive debate.
And it's just like what it what's what
are we doing here?
>> Yeah, what he meant by what are we doing
here is
you paid $300,000 to debate Candace and
you prepared
so poorly to defend your side of the
argument that you didn't even know
what Tyler Robinson was charged with in
the case.
You're a great guy Hey, he's awesome at
teaching That's what he should teach.
The tactics of putting pressure on
people
when debating. What he should absolutely
never teach is the other side of the
debate where someone puts you under
pressure and what do you do? Cuz his
answer is freak out and fold. Now, back
on Alex, let's have him finish up here.
>> So, she she she destroyed him right
there.
Look, folks, I'm going to explain the
keys here.
They claim Tyler Robinson got on the
roof, made the shot, put a .30-06
together, put a telescopic scope on it.
Then anybody that knows telescopic
scopes know you put them on, even if
they were sighted in before, they don't
even hit the paper at 100 yards.
So, the fact that he could do that, then
they put the video out that's
30-something seconds. He doesn't have
time to put a rifle together and do
that. Looks like he unfolds something,
whoever it is. So, the official story is
not true. And I broke what
Joe Kent confirmed happened. This has
been in the news, they confirmed
happened months after I broke it, that
in a cabinet meeting 7 days after
Charlie was killed, Kash Patel said I
orders from the president, we're not
looking at any foreign involvement or
all the trans groups that said he'll be
dead when he comes to town tomorrow.
So, we know there's a cover-up. Doesn't
mean everything Candace has investigated
is right. Doesn't mean every rabbit
trail they've gone down has been
accurate. But, you know, the governor
and the FBI are ordering concrete torn
up in the days after as fast as they
could, having construction crews to
hurry up and destroy it. Why would you
do that?
Okay?
What I know is the official story is not
true.
And I know the system has lost all
credibility and that's what the public
doesn't buy into this.
Do I think old time friends of Charlie
were involved killing him? Do I think
his wife was involved? No.
It's not how this stuff works.
But, did he have a high-level member of
TPUSA tell Harrison Smith I'm that out
on X month before he died,
are his text messages out?
Israel was coming after him because he
was against the war. He called me a
month before he died.
Said good job pushing this Israel Iran
the Israel first lobby is out of
control. He also said keep pressing
another phone call
exposing Epstein, Trump shouldn't be
covering that up. This is really
important. Keep putting pressure. I
said, "Thank you."
So, I had Charlie personally call me.
That's in my phone records that he
called me
repeatedly and text messaged me,
thanking me.
And when Candace said, "I've got texts
to him saying so, let me tell you what
Alex thinks." Since I I'm not sure if
he's going to say it on this one, but he
said it on Shawn Johnson's podcast. I
could show this later.
He thinks that it's a big high-level put
Charlie and Witsec hoax is what he
thinks is most likely. I have no idea.
I have no idea. I know that there's
something in my eyeball though, and it
is itching really bad. But the other
thing I know is that
it's interesting that people are coming
around to that theory even though we'll
never know, you know?
But what I do know is that Andrew Wilson
definitely doesn't know what happened
cuz he doesn't know anything about the
case. So, that's what that is and uh now
I'm going to cover
uh Andrew Wilson's wife going ham on X.
So, that's going to be really funny.
Look for that as well.