Ana Kasparian Explodes on Destiny Over Mocking Charlie Kirk's Widow Erika Kirk

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Andrew Kolvet and Chris Cuomo Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy and Rising Political Violence in America

Andrew Kolvet and Chris Cuomo Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy and Rising Political Violence in America

19:01

Megyn Kelly Reports on Charlie Kirk Assassination: Donald Trump Jr. First Interview After Friend's Murder

Megyn Kelly Reports on Charlie Kirk Assassination: Donald Trump Jr. First Interview After Friend's Murder

1:44:37

Office Depot Refuses to Print Charlie Kirk Memorial Poster, Calls It Propaganda Before Firing Employee

Office Depot Refuses to Print Charlie Kirk Memorial Poster, Calls It Propaganda Before Firing Employee

15:18

Ana Kasparian Explodes on Destiny Over Mocking Charlie Kirk's Widow Erika Kirk

Patrick Bet-David and Eric Bolling react to a heated exchange between Ana Kasparian and Destiny over mocking Charlie Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk. The discussion examines the boundaries of political discourse, the weaponization of grief, and the depths of cruelty displayed by some public figures following Kirk's assassination. From Keith Olbermann's shocking tweet suggesting Kirk went to hell, to Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett blaming guns within hours of his death, the panel dissects how political hatred has poisoned basic human decency. Bet-David announced that $100,000 raised through merchandise sales was donated to Turning Point USA, with the fundraising effort continuing in Charlie Kirk's memory.

Categories: Analysis
September 17, 2025

The Confrontation Between Ana Kasparian and Destiny

Patrick Bet-David and Eric Bolling analyzed a viral clip showing Ana Kasparian of The Young Turks confronting political commentator Destiny over his mocking of Erika Kirk, widow of the late Charlie Kirk. The exchange revealed a stark divide over the boundaries of political discourse in the wake of tragedy.

Destiny defended his mockery by arguing that because Erika Kirk's grief was being "weaponized" for political recruitment—referencing her 17-minute speech and her continued presence at Turning Point USA events shortly after Charlie's assassination—he not only had the "ability" but the "obligation" to mock her. He claimed that her speech about "good versus evil" constituted political activity that justified his response.

Kasparian pushed back forcefully, telling Destiny: "You have so much hatred in your heart." She emphasized the human dimension of grief that Destiny appeared to dismiss entirely. "If someone assassinated my husband, I would not be able to have the level of composure she had during that speech. I would be out for blood," Kasparian explained. "You need to understand what being a human is. What it's like to actually lose someone that you love, that you chose to spend your life with, that you chose to raise children with, a person who was violently and viciously assassinated like that."

Destiny attempted to deflect by accusing Kasparian of allowing her own experiences of being "bullied online" to define her political ideology, suggesting her defense of Erika Kirk stemmed from personal grievances rather than principle. Kasparian stood her ground, insisting that basic human decency should transcend political disagreements.

Keith Olbermann's Shocking Tweet

The discussion then turned to one of the most egregious examples of post-assassination cruelty: a tweet from former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann. Bet-David shared Olbermann's message, which read: "I assume Kash Patel means Valhalla New York because otherwise I hate to break it to him, but neither he nor Kirk nor Trump are getting into heaven."

Bet-David expressed disbelief at the malice behind such a statement. "He's basically saying Charlie is in hell. That's what this guy is saying," Bet-David explained. Rather than responding with equal vitriol, Bet-David said he replied to Olbermann asking: "Dude, did your parents hurt you? They had to have. Who hurt you? Who didn't believe in you? Who made you feel not good for you to have this level of hate in your body?"

The panel contemplated what creates such deep-seated hatred in a person. "This is not normal for somebody," Bet-David observed. "What makes someone like that? Who hurt you to say something this nasty?" The conversation raised questions about whether such individuals had been psychologically damaged by family trauma, systemic influences, or the relentless negativity of partisan media.

Blaming the Media Industrial Complex

Bet-David suggested that figures like Olbermann and others displaying similar cruelty might actually be victims themselves—victims of a media environment that had poisoned their ability to think rationally. "If I was Rosie O'Donnell, if I was Keith Olbermann, if I was these psycho leftists, I would do a class action lawsuit and say, 'You guys, CNN, MSNBC, all these all of you guys that have been spitting this poison, you've ruined our brains. You've ruined our brains,'" Bet-David said.

The implication was that years of consuming and participating in hyper-partisan media had fundamentally altered these individuals' capacity for basic human empathy. "Who, what human being thinks like this?" Bet-David asked, suggesting that something systemic—not merely individual moral failure—had created this environment.

Jasmine Crockett's Response

Eric Bolling highlighted another troubling response to Charlie Kirk's assassination: comments from Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, who some consider a potential 2028 presidential contender. Crockett blamed Charlie Kirk's death on "assault weapons" and claimed it wouldn't have happened if not for policies supported by Donald Trump.

Bolling called out the factual inaccuracy and timing of her statement. "That is number one patently false. It wasn't an assault rifle. It was a rifle. It was a sniper rifle. It wasn't—they have no idea what they're talking about. Blaming guns again, again within minutes of his death," Bolling said. He noted the pattern of immediately politicizing tragedy rather than allowing even a brief moment for grief and reflection.

"If our elected officials can't take a moment and be heartfelt and sorrowful for the loss of someone on our side and blame people immediately—blame MAGA, then blame Charlie for his own words, and then blame the guns—this is what they do," Bolling observed. He expressed pessimism about the possibility of national unity: "If they can't have that, then we'll never ever ever be able to come together. We are just destined to be two separate countries."

$100,000 Raised for Turning Point USA

On a more positive note, Bet-David announced that his audience had rallied to support Turning Point USA in Charlie Kirk's memory. He had previously pledged that 100% of proceeds—not profits, but total revenue—from USA-themed merchandise sales would be donated to the organization Charlie founded.

"Within 24 hours, we sold $100,000 worth," Bet-David revealed. "We're announcing today that we're sending $100,000 to Turning Point USA. We sent it to them yesterday. It was wired over to them yesterday." He emphasized that the achievement belonged to his audience: "That $100,000 went because of you. You guys chose to do this. So, respect to all of you."

The fundraising campaign continued beyond the initial 24 hours, with new designs added to the collection, including a "Live Free" shirt featuring an American flag with "Future Looks Bright" integrated into the design. Bet-David reiterated that 100% of all purchases from the USA collection would go directly to Turning Point USA, with updates promised on the total raised by week's end.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!