2,387 videos 1,376,944,188 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff on Political Violence, Montana State Rally, and Red Mass Explosives Plot
Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff discuss the electric atmosphere at Turning Point USA's Montana State University rally, where students packed the venue and chanted in support of open dialogue on campus. The conversation shifts to a disturbing trend of political violence, including the arrest of a man with over 200 homemade explosive devices outside the Red Mass ceremony attended by Supreme Court justices. They examine the lenient sentencing of Brett Kavanaugh's attempted assassin and argue that society must enforce consequences for those who celebrate or engage in political violence. From campus energy to serious threats against public figures, Kolvet and Neff make the case that America's tradition of debate and dialogue is under attack.
Montana State University Rally Energizes Campus Movement
Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, opened the discussion with a praise report from Montana State University, where Turning Point USA's "This is the Turning Point" campus tour made its latest stop. Despite Montana not being a major population center, the venue was packed with enthusiastic students who chanted, jumped, and created an electric atmosphere that demonstrated the energy behind the campus conservative movement.
Vivek Ramaswamy, who left his gubernatorial campaign efforts in Ohio to attend, spoke to the students, showcasing the commitment that movement leaders have to Turning Point's campus mission. The crowd's energy was so intense that "Charlie" chants broke out, reminiscent of previous viral moments at events like Politicon. Kolvet reflected on how the chant has become a rallying cry, comparing it to "USA" chants at patriotic events.
For Kolvet, the rally represented a clarifying moment. After weeks of challenges and attacks, the event reminded him of what Turning Point USA is fundamentally about: dialogue, debate, and the free exchange of ideas on college campuses. The organization has always championed conversation over confrontation and debate over violence, making it especially important during a time when political discourse is becoming increasingly hostile.
The Red Mass Explosives Plot
The conversation took a darker turn as Blake Neff discussed a disturbing incident in Washington, D.C., involving the Red Mass, an annual Catholic ceremony dating back to the Middle Ages that's dedicated to lawyers and members of the legal profession. The event has gained prominence in recent years because many conservative Supreme Court justices, who are Catholic, attend the service.
Louis Garry, a 41-year-old man, was discovered in a tent outside the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle when police arrived to secure the area for the Supreme Court justices. When approached by officers, Garry warned them to stay back, claiming he had explosive devices. According to court records, he possessed over 200 vials of nitromethane configured as homemade grenades, complete with fuses secured by rubber bands. He also had Molotov cocktails and modified bottle rockets covered with aluminum foil and treated in a pyrotechnic solution. Authorities determined the devices were fully functional.
Garry told officers, "You might want to stay back and call the federales. I have explosives." While he appeared to be mentally unstable and perhaps incapable of executing a sophisticated attack, his presence with functional explosive devices outside a venue where Supreme Court justices were gathering represented a serious security threat.
Neff pointed out that NBC4 Washington initially described the incident with remarkable understatement, tweeting that "a man who had vials of liquid" was arrested outside the cathedral. Community note contributors quickly added context, clarifying that the "vials of liquid" were actually Molotov cocktails, creating one of the most notable community notes corrections in recent memory.
The Red Mass incident came just one week after the sentencing of the man who attempted to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. That would-be assassin had taken a far more systematic approach, flying across the country with a detailed plan that included acquiring a gun, wire cutters, and a knife. He had researched Kavanaugh's home address and was prepared to carry out the attack when he arrived at the justice's residence.
The attempt failed only because the assassin experienced a failure of nerve when he saw federal agents posted outside Kavanaugh's home. He subsequently turned himself in. Despite the seriousness of the planned attack, the federal judge presiding over the case sentenced him to only eight years in prison, of which he had already served three. The judge expressed sympathy because the defendant now identified as a transgender woman and would have to serve time in a men's prison.
Most troublingly, according to Nef, the judge became angry when someone referred to the assassination attempt as a political attack, insisting that judges aren't political and that there couldn't be a political agenda involved. Even the defendant's own lawyer acknowledged the political nature of the crime.
The Left's Rhetoric and Culture of Political Violence
Nef argued that these incidents don't occur in a vacuum. They're the result of an environment where people are constantly exposed to extreme rhetoric from the left. Terms like "fascist" and "Nazi" are deployed regularly, particularly around issues like Supreme Court rulings on abortion, gun rights, and child gender transitions. Rather than simply disagreeing with these decisions, activists often frame them in apocalyptic terms, claiming that conservatives are "denying your existence," "trying to destroy your right to exist," or actively attempting to kill vulnerable populations.
This totalizing rhetoric creates a permission structure for violence. If someone truly believes that political opponents are trying to exterminate entire groups of people, violent resistance can seem not just justified but necessary. The left's use of this inflammatory language, combined with lenient treatment of those who act on it, creates a dangerous cycle.
Celebrating Violence Must Have Consequences
Kolvet emphasized the importance of the response to recent attacks on conservative figures. In the aftermath of the attack on Charlie Kirk, numerous social media accounts celebrated the violence. Accounts like Libs of TikTok worked to expose these individuals, many of whom faced employment consequences for their ghoulish celebrations of political violence.
Kolvet defended these efforts, arguing that people who celebrate violence should face social and professional consequences. Creating and maintaining a taboo against political assassination requires more than just laws on the books. It requires a culture that treats such acts and the celebration of such acts as beyond the pale. When someone like Jimmy Kimmel lies about who's behind an attack and then doubles down, he deserves backlash. When anonymous social media users celebrate violence, they deserve to be exposed and face consequences in their professional lives.
However, Kolvet stressed that social consequences aren't enough. There must also be legal consequences. Judges need to take attempted assassinations seriously, regardless of the political leanings of the perpetrator or target. Leniency toward someone who planned to murder a Supreme Court justice sends a message that such acts aren't really that serious. When a would-be assassin receives a relatively light sentence, it's only a matter of time before another disturbed individual attempts something similar.
The Direct Line Between Leniency and Violence
Nef drew a direct connection between the lenient sentencing of Kavanaugh's attempted assassin and the Red Mass explosives incident one week later. When society fails to punish evildoers appropriately, it invites more evil. The taboo against political violence is only as strong as society's willingness to enforce it through meaningful consequences.
If potential assassins know they might serve only a few years in prison, and if they're surrounded by a culture that portrays their targets as existential threats to humanity, the barrier to action becomes dangerously low. Conversely, when society treats these acts with the seriousness they deserve, when judges impose harsh sentences, and when the broader culture universally condemns political violence, the taboo holds.
Why Turning Point USA Matters Now More Than Ever
Kolvet circled back to the Montana State rally, explaining why Turning Point USA's mission is so critical at this moment. The organization has always been about debate, dialogue, and conversation. In a time when political discourse increasingly turns violent, when people celebrate attacks on their opponents, and when the most extreme rhetoric becomes normalized, spaces for genuine dialogue become essential.
Turning Point USA represents an alternative to the culture of violence. It creates venues where ideas can clash without people attacking each other. It builds a movement of young people who believe in persuasion rather than coercion, in debate rather than destruction. The energy at Montana State wasn't just enthusiasm for conservative ideas—it was enthusiasm for the American tradition of free speech and open dialogue.
The contrast couldn't be starker. On one side, you have packed auditoriums of students eager to hear different perspectives and engage in civil discourse. On the other, you have individuals with explosives outside churches and would-be assassins lurking outside the homes of Supreme Court justices. One approach builds a stronger America; the other tears it apart.
The Path Forward
Both Kolvet and Nef emphasized that the answer to the current crisis isn't complicated, but it requires commitment from all parts of society. First, the taboo against political violence must be maintained and strengthened. This means exposing and creating consequences for those who celebrate such violence, even when they haven't personally engaged in it. Second, the legal system must take threats and attempts against public figures with absolute seriousness, imposing sentences that reflect the gravity of attempting to murder judges, politicians, or other public servants. Third, society must create alternative venues for political engagement—spaces like Turning Point USA events where passionate disagreement doesn't lead to violence but to better understanding and sharper arguments.
The work continues on college campuses across America, where Turning Point USA brings speakers, hosts debates, and creates communities of students committed to the free exchange of ideas. The work continues in holding media figures accountable when they spread misinformation or celebrate violence. And the work continues in demanding that judges and prosecutors treat political violence as the serious crime it is, regardless of the political affiliations involved.
