Up Next
Charlie Kirk Analyzes Israel's Preemptive Strike on Iran as Regional War Looms in Middle East
1:40:21
Candace Owens Exposes Erika Kirk's Lies and Jeremy Boreing's Epic Failures at DailyWire+ and Turning Point USA
1:08:56
Charlie Kirk's Evolution on Israel: From Staunch Defender to Questioning Voice Got Him Killed
45:34
Brandon Tatum Exposes Conspiracy Theories and Double Standards Surrounding Charlie Kirk Assassination and Israel-Gaza Conflict
Brandon Tatum dismantles dangerous conspiracy theories circulating about Charlie Kirk's assassination while defending the investigative process and Erika Kirk's response to tragedy. He confronts critics like Stew Peters and Nick Fuentes who spread baseless claims, from exploding lavalier microphones to arranged marriages. Tatum also addresses the Michigan church attack and breaks down the glaring double standards applied to Israel's response to Hamas terrorism, comparing American military responses throughout history. With direct commentary on Netanyahu's White House meeting with President Trump and a proposed 21-point peace plan, Tatum challenges those pushing anti-Israel narratives to confront the facts about Hamas's role as a terrorist organization embedded within Gaza's civilian population.
Michigan Church Attack: Waiting for Facts Over Speculation
Brandon Tatum opens by addressing the tragic attack at a Michigan church where a Marine veteran who fought in Afghanistan rammed his truck into the building, shot multiple people resulting in five confirmed deaths, and set the facility ablaze. Tatum emphasizes the importance of waiting for investigatory information rather than jumping to conspiracies.
"I want you guys to know, and this is why you can trust Brandon Tatum, because I'm not going to push conspiracies. I'm only going to push what investigatory information that we have," Tatum states. He identifies this as another attack on a faith-based facility, part of a pattern of attacks on Christian institutions.
Tatum pushes back against those attempting to politicize the incident by labeling the attacker as a Trump supporter or Republican, arguing that such violence contradicts all Republican theology and policy. He notes that Democrats and leftist rhetoric actively creates hatred and animosity by calling conservatives fascists and Nazis, while there is no conservative rhetoric that instructs people to commit violence against churches.
The police chief described the incident as an "evil act of violence" that does not define the Grand Blanc community. Eight people were injured in addition to the five fatalities. Tatum speculates that the attacker may have had a specific grievance with this particular LDS church, though he stresses this is only his opinion based on the planned nature of the attack.
Debunking Dangerous Conspiracy Theories About Charlie Kirk's Assassination
Tatum delivers a passionate rebuke of conspiracy theorists spreading misinformation about Charlie Kirk's assassination. He warns that people spreading unverified conspiracies are "unwittingly, some of them willingly, propping up a defense for the defense team" by creating arguments that could establish reasonable doubt and potentially allow the shooter to escape justice.
"If this shooter is the shooter, you are doing more harm than good by coming up with a defense attorney's arguments to create reasonable doubt," Tatum explains. He emphasizes that spreading conspiracies could taint the jury pool and jeopardize the entire case.
Tatum addresses those demanding Turning Point USA release footage of the incident, stating: "This is not a game. This is not a talk show. This is not a reality show. This is not social media. This is real people doing a real investigation that have real people's lives on the line."
He references the recent court hearing where both defense and prosecution acknowledged the massive amount of evidence to review, including extensive electronic communications from multiple devices and platforms like Discord. The defense indicated that more than 20 or 30 people either communicated with or knew about the defendant's intentions to kill Charlie Kirk.
Stew Peters and the Exploding Lavalier Microphone Theory
Tatum calls out Stew Peters as "the nuttiest person on planet Earth" for promoting an absurd theory that Charlie Kirk was killed by an explosive device hidden in his lavalier microphone rather than by the accused shooter. Peters claimed on his show that Charlie Kirk's Israeli security detail was responsible for his death.
"The lavalier explodes and goes on the other side and kills him?" Tatum questions incredulously. "There is no evidence on no video that nobody has ever presented or saw an entrance wound on the other side of his neck. Where are you getting that?"
Tatum points out the obvious flaws in this theory: if a lavalier microphone contained munitions powerful enough to kill someone, it would be too heavy to be held by the magnetic clip used to attach it to clothing. He also notes that the security team being accused served in the United States military or law enforcement, and Tatum knows them personally.
"These people were hired by Turning Point and they serve, many of them served in the United States military or law enforcement. I know these guys personally. What are you talking about, bro?" Tatum asks.
Nick Fuentes Attacks Erika Kirk's Response to Her Husband's Death
Tatum delivers a scathing response to Nick Fuentes, who criticized Erika Kirk for how she has handled her grief following Charlie Kirk's assassination. Fuentes questioned why Erika appeared at public events, continued Charlie Kirk's show, and sent fundraising messages so soon after her husband's death.
"It's like, lady, didn't your husband just get his face blown off like two seconds ago?" Fuentes said on his show, calling Erika's behavior "inappropriate," "weird," and "bizarre."
Tatum defends Erika Kirk passionately: "Some people know how to put on the face that they need for their husband's legacy to do what she got to do to continue his legacy. What kind of woman would just sit at home and cry all day when she was married to a soldier, a man who stood on principle, that fought every day for American values?"
He compares the situation to biblical figures who continued their mission even after tragedy: "That's like saying that the apostles when Jesus was crucified on the cross somehow they supposed to sit around and cry all day. That Mary was supposed to sit around and cry all day. No, they said they killed my son. Mary said they killed our brother and we must continue on even in the face of death."
Tatum also dismantles Fuentes's claim that Charlie and Erika Kirk had an "arranged marriage." He explains that Charlie has publicly discussed many times how he met Erika when she applied for a job at Turning Point USA, and during the interview they connected, leading Charlie to pursue a relationship instead of hiring her.
Netanyahu at the White House: Trump's Middle East Peace Plan
Tatum addresses Tucker Carlson and others who criticize Netanyahu while remaining silent about President Trump's involvement with Israel. "If Netanyahu is committing a genocide and a war criminal, and Donald Trump is having him at the White House negotiating peace with him, what does that make Donald Trump?" Tatum challenges.
He calls out the inconsistency: "You could say all these negative things about Netanyahu and Israel, but Trump is involved in it too. But you wouldn't dare call his name out because you don't really want that smoke with Donald Trump. You are a coward, Tucker Carlson."
Details emerged of a US-proposed 21-point peace plan for ending the war in Gaza. In an exclusive interview, Netanyahu discussed working with President Trump's team on the plan, which would include freeing hostages, eliminating Hamas rule, demilitarizing Gaza, and establishing a new future for both Gazans and Israelis.
According to reports, if Israel and Hamas agree to the plan, the war would immediately end, the IDF would gradually withdraw from Gaza, all hostages would be returned within 48 hours, Israel would free 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, and aid would surge immediately. Hamas members who choose to stay would potentially receive amnesty.
Trump described the meeting as "a big day, a beautiful day, potentially one of the great days ever in civilization." He emphasized that the discussions went beyond Gaza to include "peace in the Middle East" and "eternal peace in the Middle East," involving Iran, trade, and the expansion of the Abraham Accords.
Hamas Leader Admits Terrorists Are Embedded in Civilian Population
Tatum highlights a CNN interview with Hamzi Hammad, a senior Hamas official who publicly endorses Hamas's violent actions from October 7th. In the interview, Hammad made several revealing statements that undermine pro-Hamas narratives.
When asked if Hamas intended to use Israeli hostages as human shields, Hammad denied it, claiming: "We never use these people just as shields. We as Hamas, we use these people or we deal with people according to the Islamic principles and according to the Islamic values."
Tatum responds: "Islamic principles and Islamic values? You killed a few of them already. You killed like half of the hostages. That's Islamic values? You're starving the other ones that we see in the video. That's Islamic values?"
Most significantly, Hammad admitted: "Hamas is part of the Palestinian fabric. You could not exclude Hamas." This statement, Tatum argues, proves that Hamas is embedded throughout the civilian population and cannot be separated from it.
When asked about giving the Red Cross access to hostages, Hammad repeatedly said it was "not easy" and cited complicated security situations, despite having no problem spreading hostages throughout Gaza City's civilian population.
The Double Standard Applied to Israel
Tatum features a clip from a commentator who perfectly articulated the double standard applied to Israel when prosecuting war. The speaker provided historical context that Tatum found compelling:
"2,200 American servicemen killed at Pearl Harbor. We go on to kill 3 and a half million Japanese including 100,000 in one night. 2,800 Americans in 9/11. We go on to kill 400,000 people in Afghanistan and Iraq. We weren't accused of genocide."
The commentator posed a hypothetical: "If Mexico had elected a jihadist cartel to run their country and then they incurred into Texas and on a per capita basis killed 35,000 people or the population of the University of Texas and on the way back took the freshman class at SMU hostage and hid them under tunnels. What would we do? It'd be the great Sonora radioactive parking lot."
He concluded: "Jews are not allowed and Israel is not allowed to prosecute a war. And they are prosecuting a war more humanely than we have done. The ratio of combatants to civilians, of civilian death to combatant mortality, is lower than it was in Mosul, lower than it was in Japan, lower was in Germany."
Tatum enthusiastically agreed: "That made me feel patriotic. When you come over here and you kill a thousand people, we will obliterate you from existence. You will never—if they ever did this in America and they came over here and did that, I want history to reflect such atrocity that you forget that the people ever lived."
The Reality of Gaza and Hamas
Tatum addresses the fundamental problem with Gaza: "Most of Gaza is riddled with this ideology. There is no saving Gaza from continuing terrorist activity against Israel because the very same people that cry, 'This is an apartheid. This is a genocide.' What do you think the people in Gaza think?"
He argues that if people around the world are claiming genocide is happening, Gazans believe it too, which fuels continued conflict: "You think they want peace? You think they won't go to war? You think they don't believe that they're occupied? Every one of them somehow believe everything is—they believe they're occupied too. They believe it's a genocide too. What do you think they're teaching and preaching to the young people?"
Regarding the justification for fighting, Tatum offers a stark perspective: "If you believe you're occupied, you believe it's a genocide, then it's justified for you to fight for it. But when Israel kicks your ass, then don't say nothing. If you think that you want to fight back and when the people you fight against kill you, stop making excuses."
He draws a parallel: "If the Native Americans decided we are tired of living on the reservation and Tahana in Arizona decide we're going to take over our land back, good luck. You in your heart, you right. But when America turn you into a graveyard, then what?"
Tatum points out that Israel won wars and doesn't owe Palestinians anything, yet still provides them access to regions where they can govern themselves. The problem is that "their only thought is kill Jews, not let's build our own empire."
Why Tatum Trusts Trump's Judgment on Israel
Tatum explains why he trusts President Trump's assessment of the situation with Israel and Netanyahu over online commentators: "Donald Trump is making him come to the table to negotiate peace. He's not initiating peace. Donald Trump is saying, 'We're going to have peace.' And Netanyahu is cooperating."
He emphasizes Trump's credibility: "Donald Trump has spoken to this man multiple times. Donald Trump has been briefed on the circumstances and situations that we are or have been involved with Israel. And Donald Trump is making a decision to say, 'I support this. I'm willing to work with Netanyahu and he's not a war criminal.'"
Tatum contrasts Trump with critics: "I tend to believe Donald Trump, whom we have voted for, that has been incredible for America, that have always put America first, have not gotten us in the wars that we shouldn't be fighting in, has put his neck on the line to make sure America is right. That man that put his family and everything on the line for America, I believe his sentiment more than somebody just getting clicks online or somebody that's trying to be relevant after they lost their job somewhere."
He acknowledges he doesn't necessarily agree with all of Netanyahu's tactics, wishing Israel had acted more decisively earlier: "I wish he'd have just knocked off a whole bunch of people at the first point and got as many hostages back as they could and went after them immediately. Mass casualty situation, which is what America would have done."
Historical Pattern: Nations That Oppose Israel
Tatum closes with a historical observation about nations that have opposed the Jewish people: "Every nation that has exiled Jews and been against Jews, where are they at today? The Ottoman Empire, where are they at today? The Nazis in Germany, where are they at today? All the countries, the Romans, where are they at today?"
He contrasts this with Israel's allies: "All of the people who are partners with Israel in peace, Dubai and all the UAE, all these other places, they're prosperous. The most prosperous nation in the world is the biggest ally to Israel. You think it's a coincidence? I don't."
Video Transcript
Mr. C took a bullet for all didn't finish this till we answer the call and we said hey the time. [Music] Oh, the land of the free and the home of the brave. I'm a proud American from my birth to the grave. 47 is the dog. Took a bullet for all. Didn't finish. Till we answer the call that we say [Music] Be the opposite behind. [Music] If you don't believe that we are in a fight today, you're sleeping under a rock. If you get hit and you lay down and you cry and you fold up in the corner, definitely you will not win the fight. We show up to win. Our culture needs a lot of you young people in here to step up and stand out. There is nothing or no principality, power, division, devil can stop us. We're united. They can only get you when you divide it. When I see the American flag, I see us progressing to something that can be awesome and great. And if you don't plan on winning, you might as well go on today. [Music] Ladies and gentlemen, gentlemen, ladies, welcome back to another Officer Tatum Show. There's a whole bunch of stuff to talk about. I'm going to try to make it quick because I got an interview here in a minute, but let's jump right into it with the uh Michigan church fire. And a lot of controversy obviously is coming out of this. We don't have a lot of information as of yet, but the information we do know right now is that there was a a veteran, a Marine veteran, fought in Afghanistan, decided to ram his truck into the building, multiple people shot, five people confirmed dead, and uh he set the place ablaze. In my opinion, based on what I know so far and what's presented to us, because I want you guys to know, and this is why you can trust Brandon Tatum, cuz I'm not going to push conspiracies. I'm only going to push what investigatory information that we have and you don't need to jump to speculation and conclusions because at some point some real information going to come out then we can evaluate that. So right now this to me looks like nothing other than another attack on a a a faith-based facility. We've seen him shoot up the churches. We've seen them shoot up the schools that are Christianbased. And this is another example of a Christian threat or a attack on a Christian institution. Now, a lot of people will want to jump to the conclusion to say, "Oh, it's somebody on the right. This person was a Trump supporter." I think that's it. That's that's unreasonable to bring that up because I don't think it has any weight here. The real issue is the attack on Christianity. Now, I would argue this. If the person was quote unquote Republican, what Republican theology or policy does this align with? When are Republicans or MAGA against Christians? When are Republicans and MAGA uh uh participate in mass shootings and violence? That's not even a talking point or a theory associated with Republicans. The difference between the Republican and the Democrat is that the Democrat leftist people that we see doing violence are doing it at the at the uh uh I would say instruction and influence from the rhetoric that's coming from the left to say that we're fascist to say that we need to be taken out to say that we should be attacked in the middle of the street to say that we're we're we're uh destroying people's lives through Medicare and Medicaid saying that we're Nazis and and saying that we're uh rounding up illegal aliens for no reason and doing and all this stuff that they're creating hatred and animosity based on their rhetoric. There is no conservative rhetoric that tells a person to go to a church and commit a heinous crime. So, let's listen to the police chief on some of the investigatory information that we have so far. I wrote a clip. >> Evil. This was an evil act of violence. That's exactly what this was. And this is not Graham Blank. This does not define Graham Blank and who we are. We are a community and I am confident that together we're going to build a stronger community due to this incident. Now, an update. This left five people dead, eight people injured. As I said, this is an evil act and does not define Graham Blank or who we are at this time. What we know is everyone has been accounted for. We still are in the process of clearing out that church, but at this time everyone is accounted for. >> So, let's play the other link. Click clip two real quick. And this is going to be brief because we don't have much information, but wrote a clip. >> Hi, Chief Renie. Gran Blank Township Police Department here to give you an update on the active shooter situation that we had and it settled just recently on today's date at 10:25 a.m. So, I want to give the community just a brief update. There has been one more fatality due to gunshots. Uh that person had died at a local hospital. Um, as far as reunification, if you're wondering how to reunify with your family member, I want to provide you with a phone number. That phone number is 248705 7352. That number will lead you to the Red Cross who is on scene over there at Trillium with several people who were at the uh church when this incident took place. and they will be able to tell you where your family member is at. For the community, we know that you're hurting right now and we also want to provide services to our entire Grand Blank community starting tomorrow from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and all throughout this week at the Graham Blank Township Police Department. You could come in if there's anything that you're thinking, anything that you want to talk about. We'll have counselors on staff. So 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. starting tomorrow at the Grand Blank Township Police Department all week long. So um I plan on giving the community an update through a press conference starting at 5:00 p.m. today. Also at the Graham Blank Township Police Department. >> Now let me add a little bit of context here. Not context, but let me just add a little bit of my opinion here. I I think that when we find out what happened, I think that this person may have had an a with this particular LDS church. I don't know that for a fact, but I'm assuming that that's why a person would plan and execute such a heinous crime against a specific church in the area. Now, I'm not saying any of what the person did is justified. Even if the people at this church were doing something wrong, you still don't go kill people and do all that like a coward. Now, let me just add this too because I think it's it's pertinent to to talk about in these scenarios. I I want people to not jump to conclusions as of yet. Hold your water. When information comes out, I will be on top of it and I will let you know exactly what is going on. Um, but it it is it is crazy to me at this point for people to be saying we need to ban semi semi-automatic weapons like rifles. If you know anything about ballistics, you know anything about tactics, you know anything about people who have their mind made up and and I would argue the handgun is just as dangerous. You could put a switch on a handgun and make it semi-auto fully automatic. You can bring multiple magazines. You can conceal a handgun a lot better. And a lot of times when a person is utilizing a handgun, they are more directed at firing shots than they are spraying and praying with AR-15s. And I'm telling you, that's why majority of shooting incidents that occur in the United States of America occur with handguns. It's easily concealable and it also is more targeted. Therefore, a person will look and gun down people individually instead of spraying because they have this false sense of accuracy and and and and effectiveness from an AR-15 if they're not, you know, in my opinion. That's just my opinion. I I've shot AR-15, I shot a handgun. If I had to go into a situation with a AR-15 versus a handgun, now obviously I have tactical experience. I was on a SWAT team, so obviously I I know how to direct the shots, but and he was a Marine, but I don't know how active he was. I don't know how proficient he was. I don't know if he was in any any tactical environment. Just cuz you're a Marine don't mean you really that good to be quite honest. Um, you have to have some tactical experience. But using a handgun, using a rifle, if I had to go one or the other, I have to be more methodical and more strategic and more point blank if I have a handgun versus with a rifle, if you're trying to cause mass casualties, you would just spray. That's just my two cent. Let's get to the stupidity surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination. Um, I will say this, people who are spreading conspiracies that are unverified are unwittingly, some of them are willingly propping up a defense for the defense team. And this is not my own thought. Another guy uh came up with this idea and I thought it was brilliant that he mentioned it and I think it's 100% true. If this shooter is the shooter, you are doing more harm than good by coming up with a defense attorney's arguments to create reasonable doubt. So therefore, you could create an environment in a situation that taints a jury pool that also creates reasonable doubt that if this is the actual suspect, the suspect could get off in the crime. Is do you want that on your consciousness? You claim that you love Charlie and you love Turning Point USA. You claim that you support the movement, whoever that you are, and I see a ton of you guys, and I'm going to expose a few of them right now, that are saying things that are unourred and that will cause problems in the investigation, you are absolutely unequipped to speak on a subject, if you think that Turning Point USA had anything to do with this, or you think that Turning Point USA should somehow release footage of an incident that's currently under investigation, this is not a game. This is not a talk show. This is not a reality show. This is not social media. This is these are real people doing a real investigation that have real people's lives on the line. And it bothers me to no end. And people continue to push conspiracy theories. It's okay to question, but without accurate information, you should shut your mouth and let the investigation yield results that you can then critique. I'm going to show it here in a minute, but in the hearing that was presented today on the topic, both the defense and prosecution admitted that there's tons of evidence to go through, that the defense says that they need more time to diagnose the plethora of evidence that they're going to have to evaluate to defend the def the the defendant. They also made claims clearly that there's so much electronic communication that they need ample amount of time to go through all the electronic communication. What does that mean? That means that the little cell phone stuff that you think you saw or that you saw that you think you know the totality of is not the full story. They're going to extract electronic communications from his cell phone, her cell phone or or the boy cell phone that he dating that transition. They're going to extract electronic communication with a dad's cell phone. They're going to extract electronic communication on Discord. And he said that there's more than 20 or 30 people that either communicated with or knew about the inferences of the defendant killing Charlie. Let the information come out and then critique it because there's going to be so much information in this trial and it's going to be presented live for the world to see. evidence from OM, the autopsy, experts on ballistics. It's going to be so much information. You ignorant folks, if you have the if you have any integrity, wait till there's information presented and critique the information instead of critiquing a a straw man. And then what happens is you lie about everything and then when the truth come out, you just go on to the next lie. Let's go with Stu Peters, who is the nuttiest person on planet Earth. I I think I know I thought I went on his show before. I said I've seen him before. He is the nuttiest person on planet Earth. I thought that others were nutty. He is the nuttiest. I thought it was a parody until I realized what this fool is saying. Let just roll one clip. Tyler Robinson didn't kill Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's Israeli security detail killed Charlie Kirk and Charlie Kirk's assassin is caught on tape. Blake Bednar has brought us this video. We'll break it down. Take a look at this. Here it is from the wide angle. Watch Charlie Kirk's right side of his t-shirt. Watch the lavalier lapel mic. Do you see it explode? Let's bring it in just a little bit closer. Watch this. Put it in a freeze frame. That is the explosion from Charlie Kirk's lavalier lapel mic. Want to see it again? Bring it in closer. Remember when we told you that >> this guy is stupid? I I don't want to show too much of Charlie, but he think a lavalier exploded. Somehow the lavalier exploded and then went on this side of Charlie's neck and penetrated and and killed him. We we The lavalier explodes and goes on the other side and kill. There is no evidence on no video that nobody has ever presented or saw a entrance wound on the other side of his neck. Where are you getting that? The lavalier has precision munition in it that will shoot one round through this side and out this side. If they if it has the velocity to shoot a round through from this angle, it's not going to come out this side. And if it's if it's how did it come and if it has enough velocity to blast from here, come in and out of this side, in this side, out of this side, it's going to hit somebody that's standing right next to him. His Israeli team, these people were hired by Turning Point and they serve, many of them served in the United States military or law enforcement. I know these guys personally. What are you talking about, bro? Now it's a lavalier mic. So, so, so the so you're saying the team is involved because they Nick, help me. The they travel with the lavalier mic that they use for Charlie all the time. >> The same one that they put on me when I go to the event. And if you have a lavalier mic with munition that's powerful enough to kill you, that lavalier mic will be so heavy you couldn't use the magnetic hold on it. It will be draping down his shirt. You stupid idiot. Finish the clip. Absolutely. An exit wound. Yeah, it is. Check the trajectory of the round that was deployed from that lavalier lapel mic that went directly from Charlie Kirk's lapel. that went directly from underneath Charlie Kirk's white t-shirt up through his neck and created the exit wound that we told you was an exit wound immediately when we saw >> All right. I don't like to see Charlie like that. Roll this. Let's get off of that for a second. >> But the lavalier mic shot him but didn't explode cuz the thing is hanging right here. Okay, it's get it gets worse. Now, here's Nick Fuentes, who is another idiot who's criticizing Erica Kirk's response to her her husband's assassination, wrote a clip. It's like, lady, didn't your husband just get his face blown off like two seconds ago? And not to be insensitive about it, but everyone's thinking it. No one wants to be the No one wants to say it. Everyone's thinking it. Everyone was thinking it when she gave the first speech. Everyone was definitely thinking it at the memorial. Nobody wants to say it because it's inappropriate. It's insensitive. I I am the uh the troll, right? So, I'll be the one to say it. I think it's super inappropriate. I think it's inappropriate. I think it's weird. It's bizarre. Something is off there. And I don't like it. But they're doing the Super Bowl commentators with the headsets on doing a media table. They're selling merch, registering voters. They got pyrochnics. Is this Wrestlemania or is this a funeral? Like, what are we doing here? And then the day after the funeral, I'm getting 500 texts and emails. Erica Kirk here. I miss him. Every time I blink, every beat of my heart, make sure to donate. $5, $15, $25. It's like, okay, then they're doing a show. Did you see the show today and so preient? I said it last night. I said, I'm getting like a fake vibe. I'm not Something's off there. And people say, "Well, everybody grieavves differently." Yeah, I don't know how much mileage we can get out of that one anymore. Something's not right there. Very bizarre, weird vibe there. And did you see the show? Erica hosted the Charlie Kirk show this afternoon and she's like she looks like she's over the moon. She's happy as a clam. And again, I'm not who am I to judge? Everybody grieavves differently. She's a very devout Christian. Some people say maybe that's just strength, that's resolve. I don't know. It's one thing if your husband dies, period. It's another thing if your husband dies at age 31 unexpectedly. It's another thing if your 31-year-old husband unexpectedly dies because he gets publicly executed with blood gushing out in front of thousands of people screaming and running away. That's like something that's altogether different. >> How many seconds? Oh, thank God it's over. What an idiot. What a I don't know how people think this dude is a normal person that they should platform other than kicking his butt verbally on a debate. Like, do you not have any intuition or wisdom? Do you not believe in God? These fake Christians like Nick Fuentes who trash Charlie forever and call Charlie a fake Christian. Look at his theology of Erica Kirk. dummy some people because you're a maniac and you don't have any emotional intelligence. Some people know how to put on the face that they need for their husband's legacy to do what she got to do to continue his legacy. What kind of effing woman would just sit at home and cry all day when she was married to a soldier? a man who stood on principle, that fought every day for American values, that traveled all over the country. She's married to that guy that prays over his family, that supports his family, surrounded by patriots who have something in them that's greater than what the world is offering. And she can step up to the plate to honor her husband, and she probably cries at home all night. That's like saying, Brandon, you don't cry every time you get on a thing. I have cried multiple times over what happened to Charlie, but I know how to compose myself enough to fight the good fight. These people are stupid saying that Erica's speech when she first did it, she was crying and she was But you you want to judge her on what? Show me an example of a person who lost their husband the way she lost Charlie. And what did they say in response? How was their first speech? The woman is continuing his legacy. I got the messages. I love him. I miss him. What else you want to do? Say, "Let's forget about it." It It makes your husband's death even worse if you sitting around crying about it and you're not helping further the mission. Good people that believe in God understand that God has a plan and that God's plan is bigger than ours. When you Nick Fu says, you don't believe in God. I don't know what God he believe in. You somehow think that you should be consumed by worldly uh uh events and emotionalism and not by the spirit of God that gives you grace and gives you passion to keep going. That's like saying that the apostles when Jesus was crucified on the cross somehow they supposed to sit around and cry all day. That Mary was supposed to sit around and cry all day. No, they said they killed my son. Mary said they killed our brother and we must continue on even in the face of death. And that's what the apostle did. Let's we got we got another clip from him >> talking about uh Charlie was in an arranged marriage with Erica. Wrote a clip. Um you know the thing about Erica Kirk is I 100% believe that that's an arranged marriage. Charlie and Erica I do not believe for one second that they met organically. How do you think they met each other? Do you think that they bumped into each other at CPAC and Charlie said, "Hey, let's go on a date." >> Hold on. >> No, they were set up. >> Hold on. This is why you know he's stupid. All you got to do is listen to Charlie over the last several years. Explain how he met Erica. She applied for a job at Turning Point USA. In the interview, they connected and he said, "You know what? Uh, you can't work for me because you're going to be my woman." That's normal behavior. A young man like Charlie Kirk is probably open to having a wife. Beautiful, smart, intelligent, articulate woman got something going for herself. Her resume is probably insane. A man look at her and say, "Wait a minute. You you you going to be a you you going to work be a influencer or whatever you No, you wifey material." He speak he sees so many women and there is not many women that can lead or or be in a position to be a part of his life to take him to the next level. I met my wife similarly to that. My wife was uh she was on social media or whatever and I knew she lived in California. I invited her to an event. I was talking to another woman. I mean we was trying to date another woman. I just liked Karan because she was very sweet and she was nice and I like she was a patriot and so I invited her to the event. Didn't think nothing of it. The girl that I like, she had to go somewhere else. She couldn't go to dinner with the rest of everybody else. But Korean went and me and Karen talked. She embarrassed me. Well, not embarrassed me. She blasted me because my social media sucked. She said, "Brand, let me help you with this social media." I didn't want nothing to do with Korean. She was good-looking, but she lived in California. And I ain't never living in California. I never moved from Arizona. That's what my mom was. And I don't have time to be dealing with women really. And I thought she was bougie, too, cuz she had Louis Vuitton. And now I know she thrift all that stuff and she's smart about her money. But then over time, bro, she started helping my social media. Then she started being like a like a to help me with my speaking engagements, kind of like a a manager. And then after a while, I say, "Well, wait a minute. This woman is beautiful. She's conservative. She's smart. She a grown woman. She got her stuff together. She adds so much value to my life. What am I? This is wifey material. This the kind of woman I I want to marry and I married her. But when you a little incel uh uh wanking off at night to to I don't know uh uh anime >> bunny ears. Y'all see the guy he was with doing bunny ears probably probably on the back of him at night. When you doing stuff like that, you don't understand the value of what women bring to the table. This dude is his age and he don't got no girlfriend or nothing. We know what that is, bro. You're gay probably and ain't nothing wrong being gay. That's what you want to do. But don't be in the closet about it. You running around talking all this Christian stuff and you the dumbest person on earth with no wisdom. Charlie arranged marriage. Where your evidence that this is arranged? Everybody that got married that I know in Turning Point, a lot of them young people met they people at a Turning Point event. They work with them. They ran into them. What are y'all talking? This is what happens when you in the movement. You run into somebody that's your wife. But when you a weirdo sitting in your parents house making little videos like being a racist, no woman want you anyway. Who you who what woman going to want Nick Fuentes? You ain't got nothing to offer. You too stupid not to have a build a platform or something for yourself. You go on these podcasts, you a little groper. You make your little YouTube stuff, but you are not desirable for a woman to be with. you have no nothing to offer. Anyway, I will go on, but I need to move on to my next topic. But the court proceeding happened and we'll play it in post-production so you guys can see it. But the court proceeding happened where it was like an initial council for the defendant. They introduced the council and they obviously convened to create another uh um hearing. I don't know what the hearing is called, but a hearing so they can begin to articulate their position because he just secured counsel. So, let's let's go to the next subject. And this is one that you Jew haters need to just get off of here cuz you don't want to see it. But Netanyahu went to the White House and met with Donald Trump. Let me just explain this real quick. This is why Tucker and the rest of them are cowards to me. They they love to talk about Netanyahu, but they're too cowardous to call out Donald Trump. If Netanyahu is committing a genocide and a war criminal, and Donald Trump is having him at the White House negotiating peace with him, what does that make Donald Trump? If if, like Tucker said, he going around telling the world that he run President Trump, you know, but Trump don't know. You mad, but Trump ain't mad. You can call him out, but Trump won't call him out. So what you're saying is that Trump is a wussy with a P. That's what you're saying? You're saying that Trump will let a man run around in the Middle East and say he run Donald Trump and Donald Trump will kiss his butt and let him come into the Oval Office and kik key like nothing going on. Is that what you saying, Tucker? But Tucker is a wussy with a P because he won't call Trump out. We send funding to Israel. We allowed Israel to go into the airspace in Qatar and create the bombing that y'all complaining about. We did that. We in partnership with Israel bombed Iran. But you could say all these negative things about Netanyahu in Israel, but Trump is involved in it, too. But you wouldn't dare call his name out cuz you don't really want that smoke with Donald Trump. You are a coward, Tucker Carlson. I said it with my own mouth. And there's other people I want to call out to be cowards, but that will come in due time. Let's get to the clip real quick because I got to get on the interview. Listen to what Hamas official said on the interview. And y'all dumb, ignorant fools that support a terrorist organization disguised as gazins. Listen to what he said. This is the leader of Hamas and the government structure of Gaza. Listen, and the interview was worse than this. I listened to the whole thing. So, the stainedheaded idiot that's talking underneath the gentleman that's comment commentating, listen to what he said, wrote a clip. >> No one asked Hamas to surrender. We will never surrender. We will never >> This is uh Hamzi Hammad, a senior Hamas official who publicly endorses Hamas's violent actions on October 7th. I want to show you some of Hamad's statements during a recent CNN interview. Hamas recently announced that Israeli hostages have been spread out throughout Gaza City. Is your intention to use those Israeli hostages as human shields? No, >> we never use these people just uh as as shields. No, we never use it. All the time we explain that we as Hamas, we use these people or we deal with people according to the Islamic principles and according to the Islamic values. Hold on. So what are the Islamic >> Hold on. Islamic principles and Islamic values. Y'all killed a few of them already. Y'all killed like half of the hostages. That's Islamic val. You're starving the other ones that we see in the video. That's Islamic values. We don't use them as leverage. >> Values. Torture, starvation, abuse, kidnapping men, women, and children and taking them as hostages. >> This is a statement from the Alcasam Brigades, Hamas's military. They said that in order to deter this Israeli military invasion, they are placing Israeli hostages strategically. >> The hostages are spread everywhere. >> Did you catch that? >> The hostages are spread everywhere. >> He said the hostages are spread everywhere, which means Hamas is spread everywhere. Also, the civilian population is Hamas. And he proves that with this statement in the interview. >> Hamas is is part of the the Palestinian fabric. You you could not exclude Hamas. But >> Hamas is a part of the Palestinian fabric. You can't remove it. That's what this Gazen leader has publicly proclaimed. Can someone please send that soundbite to every single world leader who just voted at the UN General Assembly? Those who think that Hamas is just going to simply disappear if they offer them statehood. >> Hamas is is part of the the Palestinian fabric. >> Hamas is a jihadist cancer and the Arab Palestinian identity is riddled with Hamas. Leaders like Hammad and many of the people who support Hamas in Gaza are just monsters. And the people who are marching in support of them are marching in support of their jihadist violent ideologies. But I want you to look at the final question and his response if you don't believe me. >> And Hamas just announced that it is holding these Israeli hostages in strategic locations around Gaza City. Why not give the Red Cross access? This is something that the families that the Red Cross has been asking for for nearly is very complicated. Security situation is very complicated. It's not easy to to get access for these people. >> Have you tried? >> It is not easy. No. >> Have you tried? >> It is not easy as I told you to for to give you access. So, let's get this straight. It's easy to spread out the surviving hostages among the civilian population of Gaza City. But it all of a sudden becomes complicated and not so easy to allow the Red Cross to give the remaining 20 living hostages the desperately needed medical attention and care they require after being held captive by Hamas for 723 days. Do you know what Hamas loves more than its own women and children? Its weapons and its power. They would rather keep their rockets and AK-47s in their future rather than their own children. >> And we will never surrender. Now, let me let's let's put this in perspective. And I'm gonna try to be short on this because I need Trump to his stuff to come out, people. What what what is the problem with Go and pray about this? Because I have seen some of the dumbest and most ignorant responses I've ever seen in my life. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Hamas murdered and filmed the killing of so many Israelis. They launched 4,000 missiles into Israel, trying to kill everybody, but they can't because the Iron Dome is there. Hamas is hiding behind their people, using them as as as literally human shields. They will not let their people go. They will not let them. Other countries won't even re receive these people. Jordan won't. Egypt won't. Other countries won't receive these people. Why? Hamas won't let them go. Won't let them free. They can show all these videos of of kids getting blown up and most of it is fake, but they can't show what they did to the hostage. How about you show what you did to the hostage that all died? They killed a hund of them, what did y'all do to them? Why Why are we not talking about the hostage that they held that died? If you can say that the Gazin people have nothing to do with Hamas, the government, then the Israeli people have nothing to do with Benjamin and Yahoo in the government. Why don't they get the dignity that you're trying to give women and children? They kidnapped women and children. They've killed them in the last wave of bodies that they brought back. They brought back a woman and two children. How did they die? Where is the video footage of that? Where is the protest of that? They killed innocent people. It it it irritates me. This a terrorist group. this guy. Listen, let me let me say this and and I'm going to be done. I'll let Trump speak. Listen to me clearly, people. Most of Gaza is riddled with this ideology. There, to be honest, there is no saving Gaza from continuing terrorist activity against Israel. Because the very same people that cry, "This is an apartheid. This is a genocide." What do you think the people in Gaza think? If the if people around the world are claiming that this is happening to the people of Gaza, what do you think they think? You think they want peace? You think they won't go to war? You think they don't believe that they're occupied? Every one of them, they somehow believe everything is co. They believe they're occupied, too. They believe it's a genocide, too. What do you think they're teaching them and preaching to the young people? So, what do you think they're going to do in the future like they have done before? And I'll say this and I'mma stop. You ignorant folk think that it's justified for Hamas to fight. I tell you this, and I said it from day one, so that you can go back and fact check me. I don't, and I said this on campus when people ask me this, I'm not in the conflict. I'm not I I haven't been there. But what I will say, I mean, I'm saying I haven't been there in the conflict. I've been to Israel. But if you believe you're occupied, you believe it's a genocide, then it's justified for you to fight for it. But when Israel kick your then don't say nothing. If you if you think that you want to fight back and when the people you fight against kill you, stop making what are we talking about? If the Native Americans decided we are tired of living on the reservation and Tahana in Arizona decide we're going to take over our land back, good luck. You in your heart, you right. But when America turn you into a graveyard, then what? What are we talking about? Israel won wars. They don't owe Palestinians nothing. But they give them access in in in regions where they can they can uh govern themselves. And their only thought is kill Jews, not to let's build our own empire. Anyway, Trump goes to the White House and speaks with Netanyahu and he comes up with a a peace agreement. Let's roll it. And and and mind you, Israel agreed to it. Like every two-state solution that ever existed on the books, Israel has agreed to every one of them. And Gaza or or the the the the Arabs denied or rejected them. What are we saying here? Quit talking about a two-state solution. Israel just agreed to this one. Let's see how Gaza will respond. We saw what the what the guy said there. They'll never surrender, but let's see what Trump and Netanyahu says in this agreement. Roll the clip. Details are emerging this weekend of a US proposed 21point peace plan for ending the war in Gaza. Moments ago, I spoke exclusively with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of his pivotal meeting tomorrow at the White House with President Trump. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, thank you for joining the Sunday briefing. I want to start by asking you if you've seen this 21point peace plan and if you plan to declare support for it at the White House tomorrow. at the White House. >> Well, we're working on it, Jackie. It's not been finalized yet, but we're working with President Trump's team actually as we speak. And I hope we can uh we can make it a go because we want to free our hostages. We want to get rid of Hamas rule and have uh them disarmed, Gaza demilitarized, and a new future set up for for Gazans and Israelis alike and for the whole region. According to some reports, if Israel, >> now you don't have to like Netanyahu. You can say he a war criminal. But what he said right there is that reasonable. The answer to me is yes. Wrote a clip. >> And Hamas agree to this plan. The war would immediately end. The IDF will gradually withdraw from the Gaza Strip. All hostages will be returned within 48 hours. And then after that, Israel would free 1,000 Palestinian prisoners and aid will surge immediately. But Hamas members who choose to stay would get amnesty. And in your speech to the UN, you didn't indicate that amnesty is in the cards. Listen to this. >> The final remnants of Hamas are holed up in Gaza City. They vow to repeat the atrocities of October 7th again and again and again, no matter how diminished their forces. That is why Israel must finish the job. Will you agree to amnesty for Hamas? >> To amnesty for? >> Well, I I think the uh the details of this have to be worked out. But in previous statements, I said that if leaders if kamas leaders, for example, uh are escorted out of the country. Uh yeah, if they finish the war, release all the hostages, we let them out. Uh that is something that we have said in the past, but it has to be worked out. All of that, I think, is part of the the plan. And I'm not going to preempt it because we're having these discussions exactly right now. >> How many Hamas fighters do you estimate are left? Is it more than before the war started? >> No, it's considerably less, but as we uh you know, as we decimated them, they actually what they did was they they stole the food that we were giving to Gazan civilians, hiked up the prices, and then used it to fund the recruiting of uh replacements. Then the replacements could be 14, 15 year olds. That's what they're doing. I mean, they're they're actually blackmailing uh Palestinian families to give them their kids in order to fill the ranks that that have been uh uh decimated by us. Uh but no, it's not the same number at all. And by the way, you have gazins now fighting Hamas, fighting Hamas, and say we we've had enough of this. We've got to we have to have something else. And they're fighting Hamas. They're killing Hamas. Some of them are dying in the process because they've had enough. And I fully understand them. >> Now, let's think about this for a minute. Let's say they agreed to a two-state solution. And I want you to put your thinking cap on. What happens if they attack Israel again? Now they're now they're own separate state, their own separate government, their own separate military. What what then they have to do this all over again? Oh my god, man. Is that the end of the clip? We got more. >> We have another clip from today. >> I just >> All right, let's play it. >> So, this is a big big day, a beautiful day, potentially one of the great days ever in civilization. Things that have >> Trump be exaggerating >> been going on for hundreds of years and thousands of years. We're going to at least we're at a minimum very very close. And I think we're beyond very close. And I want to thank BBI for really getting in there and doing a job. We've worked well together as we have with many other countries, both of us with many other countries, which is the only way this whole situation gets solved. And I'm not just talking about Gaza. Gaza is one thing, but we're talking about much beyond Gaza. the whole deal, everything getting solved. It's called peace in the Middle East. So, today uh is a historic day for peace and Prime Minister Netanyahu and I have just concluded an important meeting on many vital issues including Iran, trade, the expansion of the Abraham Accords, and most importantly, we discussed how to end the war in Gaza. But it's just a part of the bigger picture which is peace in the Middle East and let's call it eternal peace in the Middle East. So this is uh far more than anybody expected. But the the level of support that I've had from the nations in the Middle East and surrounding Israel and neighbors of Israel has been incredible. Incredible. every. >> Now, let's put this in perspective real quick and and we'll I got many more I want to talk about. We we're going to have to end here soon. But I think that this is what you're hearing from Trump is reality. You don't have to lighten everything Netanyahu is doing. I don't think everything he's doing is perfect. But the reality is Netanyahu do not run Donald Trump. Donald Trump is making him come to the table to to negotiate peace. He's not initiating peace. Donald Trump is saying, "We're going to have peace." And then Yahoo is cooperating. And Donald Trump has spoken to this man multiple times. Donald Trump has been briefed on the circumstances and situations that we are or have been involved with Israel. And Donald Trump is making a decision to say, "I I support this. I'm willing to work with Netanyahu and he's not a war criminal." I tend to believe Donald Trump, whom we have voted for, that has been incredible for America, that have always put America first, have not gotten us in the wars that we shouldn't be fighting in, has put his neck on the line to make sure America is right. That man that put his family and everything on the line for America, I believe his sentiment more than somebody just getting clicks online or somebody that's trying to be relevant after they lost their job somewhere. I I I I I don't understand why we people can't just slow down and say take a back seat. You're not in the government. You don't work for the government. You don't even know how it works. To be so ignorant to say everybody's messed up in the government. No, the government does have flaws and the government has done good things. And and you got to be a a person that's falling off a cliff to just act like everything is a conspiracy. Donald Trump may not necessarily like Benjamin Netanyahu. I don't know the man. I just think that in this war situation what he's doing and I disagree with him taking as long as he had. I wish he he'd have just knocked off a whole bunch of people at at the first point and got as many hostages back as they could and and went after the went after them immediately. Mass casualty situation, which is what America would have done. And let me tell you why I know America would have done it. And I'm going to get off here. Let's play that clip that I found because I thought this dude absolutely killed it on the show and this encapsulate everything that I've been trying to say and all of your ignorant naysayers out there. Have them disprove what he just said. Wrote a clip. >> One of my pet peeves seems to be one of your pet peeves and that is um you know 2 million people have been killed in the Sedan civil war. I haven't seen a protest in YU for that. Assad killed 500 Arabs. I didn't see colleges burned down. 500,000 Arabs killed by Assad. Saddam Hussein killed over a million Muslims in in wars. I I gassed them. I I I I didn't see protest there. And yet your school is shut down right now because Israel is responding to the worst attack against Jews worldwide since the Holocaust. Help us sort through that. >> We can debate that response. I again I don't know. algebra, but I'm pretty good at the common denominators here. And why there's no common denominators in all of these, it's just that it's Jews defending their homeland. Because if you look at the numbers, even with American wars, they don't add up. Well, first off, good to be with you, and I I especially appreciate your leadership on this issue. I'll give you some more numbers. 2,200 American servicemen killed at Pearl Harbor. We go on to kill 3 and a half million Japanese including 100,000 in one night. 2,800 Americans in 9/11. We go on to kill 400,000 people in Afghanistan and Iraq. We weren't accused of genocide. You had if if Mexico had elected a jihadist cartel to run their country and then they incurred into Texas and on a per capita basis killed 35,000 people or the population of the University of Texas and on the way back took the freshman class at SMU hostage and hid them under tunnels. What would we do? It'd be the great Sonora radioactive parking lot. But Jews are not allowed and Israel is not allowed to prosecute a war. And they are prosecuting a war more humanely than we have done. the ratio of combatants to civilians is um of civilian death to combatant mortality is lower than it was in Mosul, lower than it was in Japan, lower was in Germany. So there's just a different standard for Jews in Israel when it comes to prosecuting a war. They're allowed to fight back to a truce, but unlike America or any other Western nation that is attacked viciously, they're not allowed to win a war. It's a double standard. >> That's all I'm saying. It's a mother freaking double standard. I lit up on the inside when he said 200 2,000 was attacked at Pearl Harbor and we went on to kill three and a half million uh Japanese. That that that that made me feel patriotic. Then he go on 9/11 they killed that we come 400,000 people in in uh in the war in Afghanistan. That that that's what I that's what we supposed to be doing. When you come over here and you kill a thousand people, we will obliterate you from existence. You will never like if they ever did this in America and they came over here and did that. I want history to reflect such atrocity that you forget that the people ever lived. I want America to wipe the history of these people off of the face of the earth. What are we say? You coward mother, you know what? I want to cuss. Y'all cowards would want them to come over and kill all our people and then you want to go talk peace. There ain't no peace. Like David and Goliath, knock him over the head, behead him in front of his people, and show him who's boss. You come over here and kill American citizens. It would be the worst decision that you your existence have ever perpetuated. And I'll say this and I'mma end this. Everybody that is against Israel, Is that ringing in my ear? >> Yeah. >> It's telling me to get out of here. Every nation that has exiled Jews and be against Jews, where are they at today? The Ottoman Empire, where are they at today? The Nazis in Germany, where are they at today? All the countries, the Romans, where are they at today? All of the people who are partners with Israel in peace, uh Dubai and all the AUE, I mean the UAE, all these other places, they're prosperous. The most prosperous nation in the world is the biggest ally to Israel. You think it's a coincidence? I don't. I'll see you guys on the next one. I'm out. [Music] Oh, the land of the free and the home of the brave. I'm a proud American from my birth to the grave. 47 is the dog. Took a bullet for all. didn't finish this till we answer the call and we said be [Music] [Music]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.