Up Next
Candace Owens Uncovers Federal Operation Behind Charlie Kirk Assassination as Mainstream Media Launches Coordinated Attack
59:53
Andrew Kolvet on Charlie Kirk's Assassination, Candace Owens Conspiracy Theories, and the Future of Conservative Movement
1:10:32
George Galloway Examines Israeli Motive in Charlie Kirk Assassination Amid Growing Conservative Shift on Israel
38:00
Michael Franzese Analyzes Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories: Israel, Epstein, and God's Chosen People
Michael Franzese examines the evidence and conspiracy theories surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination, from transgender ideology and left-wing radicalization to allegations involving Israeli intelligence, Jeffrey Epstein's Mossad connections, and pressure from billionaire Bill Ackman. Drawing on his own experience with federal incarceration and organized crime, Franzese evaluates claims of a professional hit, Trump involvement, and whether Israel orchestrated the murder. He also addresses the biblical meaning of Israel as God's chosen people, clarifying that this designation doesn't mean Israel is above reproach or immune to criticism when innocents are killed in Gaza.
The Evidence Against Tyler Robinson
Michael Franzese begins by laying out the hard evidence against 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who has been formally charged with aggravated murder and faces the death penalty in Utah, where execution is still carried out by firing squad. Prosecutors filed seven charges on September 16, 2025, including aggravated murder, weapons offenses, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering.
The evidence linking Robinson to Charlie Kirk's murder is substantial. DNA was found on the trigger of the rifle used to kill Kirk, as well as on a screwdriver discovered on the rooftop and a towel that allegedly wrapped the murder weapon. Text messages show Robinson confessing to his roommate, stating "I had enough of his hatred" regarding Kirk. Robinson also appeared to confess on Discord, writing "It was me" just hours before surrendering to police. Physical evidence includes palm prints at the edge of the roof where the shooter escaped and a footprint showing Converse sneakers.
Franzese acknowledges this evidence appears compelling but urges caution, noting that in the current climate, it's difficult to trust government institutions completely. However, taking the evidence at face value, there appears to be substantial proof pointing to Robinson as the shooter.
Understanding Tyler Robinson's Background and Motivation
Robinson grew up in a right-wing family—conservative Utah Mormons whose parents and extended family are described as supporters of Donald Trump and the broader MAGA movement. This immediately led Trump critics to claim a right-winger killed Kirk, jumping to conclusions without waiting for more evidence to emerge.
However, investigators discovered that Robinson's family indicated he held left-leaning political views and had grown increasingly radical. Robinson was living with a transgender roommate with whom he was romantically involved. Investigators believe Robinson was motivated by ideological disagreement with Kirk's conservative positions, particularly his views on transgender people.
Charlie Kirk, as a Christian, believed there are only two genders—male and female. He opposed hormone therapy and surgical transition for minors and was against transgender men competing in women's sports. While Kirk didn't express hatred toward transgender individuals, he was vocal about his Christian principles on the issue, which may have incited Robinson.
Robinson had reportedly been tracking Kirk's schedule and studying campus maps prior to the attack. Reports also surfaced of bullet engravings with transgender and anti-fascist ideology, though these were later questioned. Robinson's transgender roommate is reportedly cooperating fully with authorities in the investigation.
Left-Wing Rhetoric and Radicalization
Franzese addresses the pattern of violent and hateful rhetoric that has been directed at Trump and those on the right for years. Trump blamed radical left rhetoric for the violence, stating that those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Kirk to Nazis. This is factual—the words Nazi, fascist, and danger to democracy have come primarily from the left, targeting Donald Trump in particular.
Major figures including Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Adam Schiff, Elizabeth Warren, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Chuck Schumer have all used this language, as has the media. This isn't bias, Franzese insists—it's documented fact that anyone can verify. The concern is that emotionally unbalanced individuals hear this rhetoric from positions of authority and become radicalized to act violently.
Professional Hit Theory: Franzese's Expert Assessment
High-profile figures like Roger Stone have suggested without concrete evidence that Kirk's killing was a professional hit, possibly orchestrated by a nation state, rogue government elements, or a terrorist group. Franzese, drawing on his background in organized crime, offers his expert assessment: based on the evidence available, this was not a professionally backed hit.
The shooter was a young man with experience hunting and using rifles, capable of hitting a target at 200 yards with a telescopic lens. But there's no evidence of tremendous financial support or sophisticated planning. The only puzzling element is how Robinson escaped so quickly—traveling four hours away in such a short time. He got off the building, into a car, through the woods where he dropped the gun and screwdriver, and disappeared.
This raises questions: Did anyone help him escape? Was there an accomplice? These questions need investigation, but Franzese sees no evidence of a major nation-state conspiracy or elaborate scheme with significant backing. Could there have been people in dark corners of social media pushing Robinson and others to a fever pitch of hatred against Kirk? Possibly. Bad actors could have been subtly or not-so-subtly influencing vulnerable individuals like Robinson in online forums, recognizing they had someone who might act violently and pushing him to the limit.
But as for Roger Stone's theory of an elaborate nation-state hit, Franzese respectfully disagrees. If evidence emerges to the contrary, he'll reconsider, but based on current information, he doesn't see it.
Rejecting the Trump Orchestration Theory
Some social media users blame Trump for Kirk's death, claiming the shooting could have been orchestrated by Trump to distract from Epstein files and provide a pretext for martial law. Franzese flatly rejects this theory as lunacy from social media that should be dismissed.
If Trump wanted to orchestrate a killing to create a pretext for using the military to control cities, why Charlie Kirk? If Trump were that ruthless, there were other targets he could have chosen—AOC, Bernie Sanders, politicians he openly dislikes. Why specifically Charlie Kirk? The theory makes no sense.
Furthermore, if Trump's goal was to use the military as a pretext for eventually controlling every city in the country, he would want to disarm Americans first. He wouldn't want citizens able to defend themselves against military control with their guns. Yet Trump upholds the Second Amendment and supports Americans' right to bear arms. He's not calling for gun control; he's rejecting it. The theory immediately falls apart under basic logical scrutiny. It's nonsense that deserves no serious consideration.
The Israel Connection: Candace Owens' Allegations
Franzese turns to allegations raised by Candace Owens, for whom he has great respect. Owens is very bright, does her research, and doesn't shoot from the hip. She alleged on her podcast and social media that Charlie Kirk faced increasing pressure from pro-Israel contributors and groups to change his stance or silence dissenting opinions about Israel's policies.
In recent weeks and months, Kirk had begun questioning Israel's efforts in Gaza. Franzese makes his position clear: he doesn't care if it's Israel, the United States, or any nation in the world—he does not support any country killing innocent people in Gaza or anywhere else. If Israel is killing innocent people in Gaza, he condemns them for it, as a Christian and as a human being.
According to Owens, billionaire Bill Ackman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu orchestrated a tense intervention with Kirk about a month before his death, using threats and blackmail tactics to pressure him. Candace suggested she had text messages documenting this. Franzese has no reason to disbelieve this—he can easily see Ackman, a Jewish billionaire with ties to major financial institutions, confronting Kirk about questioning Israel's Gaza policies and threatening to cut off funding to Turning Point USA.
Kirk had always been a very strong supporter of Israel, so a sudden shift in his position would have upset major pro-Israel donors. Could this meeting have happened? Absolutely. Candace Owens said it did, and Franzese doesn't think she's a liar or suddenly turning against Israel for no reason. Should we not question Israel if there's reason to? They're not superior to anyone, even if they're God's chosen people—and Franzese promises to explain what that actually means.
Evaluating Direct Israeli Involvement in the Murder
While Franzese acknowledges the possibility of pressure from Ackman and Netanyahu, he draws a clear line: he sees no evidence of elaborate planning by Israel or any other nation in the actual assassination. Looking at the facts, the videotape, and the evidence that has come forward, this appears to be a 22-year-old living with a transgender partner who acted on his own radicalization.
Franzese doesn't believe there was direct involvement—nobody approached Robinson offering money to assassinate Charlie Kirk. Even if Kirk had a confrontation with Ackman and Netanyahu and was murdered weeks later, that's not evidence of causation. Could they have been upset? Absolutely. Could they have had a blowup? Yes. But tying that to the murder is a stretch without evidence to fill that gap.
Some conspiracy theorists have attempted to link the assassination to the Groyper movement and far-right activist Nick Fuentes because Kirk had longstanding conflicts with Groypers. Messages found on bullet casings appeared to reference Groyper memes and anti-fascist themes, but Fuentes has publicly rejected these speculations, claiming his group is being framed. Without supporting evidence, these remain theories rather than facts worth serious consideration.
Charlie Kirk on Epstein and Israeli Intelligence
Kirk became increasingly vocal about connections between Jeffrey Epstein and alleged Israeli intelligence, including Mossad, and became much more critical of Israel in his final months. These comments significantly fueled conspiracy theories about the motives behind his assassination.
At the 2025 Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa, Kirk directly speculated about Epstein being connected to foreign intelligence agencies, naming MI6, Saudi intelligence, or Mossad. He said he would guess Mossad, citing Epstein's link to Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father Robert Maxwell had widely reported connections to Israel's intelligence apparatus.
Kirk spoke at length with Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson about the theory that Epstein ran blackmail operations on behalf of Israeli intelligence, targeting American political and business elites. Franzese admits this is a possibility he cannot discount. If Epstein was an Israeli agent—which Franzese wouldn't discount at all—and he was luring powerful Americans to his island, videotaping them in compromising positions so Israel could have power over America, is that possible? Franzese has to say yes.
There's a cloud or shroud of secrecy around Epstein that just doesn't sit right. The fact that Trump was so adamant about releasing the files, and then the files haven't been released in their entirety, raises questions. Ghislaine Maxwell being moved to a comfortable prison camp raises questions. Without accusing anyone directly—Franzese is not accusing Trump—things don't sound good, don't appear good, don't look good. Could he absolutely see a connection between Israeli intelligence and Epstein? Yes, he can.
Franzese's Personal Knowledge of Epstein's Death
Kirk called for greater transparency about Epstein's death and connections, describing government coverups and hinting that powerful interests, including possibly Israeli state actors, were protecting secrets about Epstein's activities. Franzese agrees—somebody is protecting these secrets. There's more than what has been revealed, and he would stake almost everything he has on one belief: Jeffrey Epstein did not commit suicide.
Franzese has a good basis for this belief. He was on that tier and in that type of cell. He spent 29 months and 7 days in solitary confinement, much of it in the federal system, in the exact same kind of jail cell that Jeffrey Epstein was in. In fact, Franzese was on that tier in MDC in 1985 and 1986, spending seven months there. He knows what he's talking about. He doesn't believe Epstein committed suicide. He doesn't believe Epstein could have committed suicide.
So what happened to Jeffrey Epstein? Is it part of a coverup? It's speculation, but speculation based on substantial circumstantial evidence. The whole Epstein mess is so ugly that we have to question everything. Franzese doesn't think the truth will ever come out, especially if the Israeli theory is true, because if Israel has dirt on prominent figures in the United States—whether in government or corporate America—we're not going to find out.
Kirk's Reported Silence After a Trump Phone Call
There are reports that Kirk abruptly stopped talking about Epstein publicly, saying he would "trust his friends in the administration to do what needs to be done," which fed additional speculation and skepticism among supporters. Did Kirk receive a call from President Trump? Franzese doesn't know that for a fact, but it's being reported. Is he discounting it? No. Is he saying it's absolute fact? No. Could it have happened? Yes, because Kirk did make that statement and did back off the Epstein matter.
Why did he back off? Maybe there's credence to the phone call theory. The whole Epstein situation is such a mess, so ugly, that we have to question everything. Franzese doesn't think the truth will ever come out. If Israel does have dirt on prominent figures in the United States, does that give Israel control over America? We can form our own conclusions to a degree.
Franzese makes an important point: if the Biden administration had information that Trump engaged in pedophilia or abusing young girls, they would have released it. They hate Trump enough to use it. That's why Franzese doesn't believe such information exists, or it's being covered up at such a high level to protect not only Trump but many others—Democrats, Republicans, people in power—because Jeffrey Epstein was doing this for decades. God knows how many people he brought to that island, to his properties in New York. God knows how many people he could have information on.
Biblical Truth: Israel as God's Chosen People
Franzese addresses a question of utmost importance for Christians: Are the Israelites God's chosen people? According to the Old Testament, yes, they are. But what does that actually mean? Many people misunderstand this designation, so Franzese provides biblical context.
Deuteronomy 7-9 tells us: "The Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples. But it was because the Lord loved you and kept the oath he swore to your forefathers that he brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the land of slavery, from the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. Know therefore that the Lord your God is God; he is the faithful God, keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commands."
God chose the nation of Israel to be the people through whom Jesus Christ would be born—the savior from sin and death (John 3:16). God first promised the Messiah after Adam and Eve's fall into sin (Genesis 3). God later confirmed that the Messiah would come from the line of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Jesus Christ is the ultimate reason why God chose Israel to be His special people.
God did not need to have a chosen people, but He decided to do it that way. Jesus had to come from some nation of people, and God chose Israel. This is what "chosen people" means—they were chosen to bring forth the Messiah.
Israel's Mission and Failures
However, God's reason for choosing Israel was not solely for producing the Messiah. God's desire for Israel was that they would teach others about Him. Israel was to be a nation of priests, prophets, and missionaries to the world. God's intent was for Israel to be a distinct people who pointed others toward God and His promised provision of a redeemer, Messiah, and Savior.
For the most part, Israel failed in this task. However, God's ultimate purpose for Israel—that of bringing the Messiah into the world—was fulfilled perfectly in the person of Jesus Christ.
Are Jews Still God's Chosen People Today?
To answer this, we must first determine what is meant by "chosen." It certainly doesn't mean these people are a special race privileged above all others because they are more righteous, smarter, or holier than others. Their history reveals human frailties and susceptibility to the carnal nature as much as any other people group.
In fact, the Jews exhibited such wickedness that God once purposed to wipe them out. They were rebellious against the Lord from the very first (Deuteronomy 9:24), and their unfaithfulness was demonstrated throughout their subsequent history in the Old Testament (Hosea 9:1).
From the very foundation of the earth, God had a plan of redemption in mind, and He needed a people group through which to work it out. Abraham and his descendants were chosen to be the means by which the whole world would be able to be saved. Their chosenness lies in their job, not their spiritual DNA. They were chosen to bring the Messiah to earth (Galatians 3:16-18, 24). This was the purpose of the Abrahamic covenant. Period.
Christian Support for Israel—With Biblical Limits
As Christians, we support Israel because they brought our Messiah, the savior of the world. We believe nobody gets to the Father, nobody gets to heaven except through Jesus Christ. Franzese believes this with all his heart based on the evidence of scripture and evidence that supports scripture's authenticity. His faith is perfect in this regard. Nobody can tell him differently, though he remains open to listening. But in 30 years, nobody has presented an argument that holds water. Jesus is the savior of the world, brought to us by God's chosen people, the Israelites.
However—and this is critical—the Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah. They don't believe He is the savior. They believe Him to be a prophet and that God's Messiah is still coming. They rejected Jesus. So God chose them to bring Jesus here, but they rejected Him.
What does that mean for today? Biblically, yes, they are still God's chosen people for the purpose of bringing the Messiah. Christians support them in that regard. But as Franzese emphasized earlier, the Israelites came out of favor with God many times. He almost wanted to annihilate the whole race. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah? God was upset with Israel many times throughout the Old Testament.
It is not "Israel right or wrong." Israel is not above reproach. We don't support Israel no matter what they do. If Israel is wreaking havoc on Gaza and killing innocent people unnecessarily, we're not supposed to support that, and we won't. There are legitimate questions about Israel doing things that are shady, and Christians are not obligated to support that.
Israel was not chosen because they were holier, smarter, brighter, or more spiritual. They were chosen because God chose them to bring the Messiah into the world. Jesus was a Jew; Mary and Joseph were Jews. In that regard, they're chosen. But it's not "Israel right or wrong." God does not teach us that about anybody, about any race. Christians are not "right or wrong" either.
Applying Biblical Standards to Israel Today
We need to understand what is meant by "God's chosen people." The fact that Jeffrey Epstein did despicable things—do we support him because he was a Jew? Absolutely not. If Jews are killing people in Gaza unnecessarily and Netanyahu is behind this, do we support him? Absolutely not.
Christians should not be condemned for saying the Jews are the chosen people, because biblically they are. Because they brought us our Messiah—whom God ordained them to bring, the savior of the world—we support them. But if they're doing wrong, we're going to call them out on it, and we're not going to support them. Franzese believes he is biblically supported in saying this.
God doesn't support sin from anybody, no matter who they are. This clarifies the whole Israeli issue and what being "chosen" really means.
A Call for Truth, Peace, and a Jesus Revolution
Franzese concludes with a passionate plea for truth and peace. The whole situation is ugly—from the murder of Charlie Kirk to the theories swirling around it, from the Epstein coverup to the violence and division tearing at the nation. He doesn't want to see another murder, whether on the left, the right, or anywhere in between. Murder is bad. Violence is bad. He doesn't want storefronts burned or looted. He wants people to be able to walk their neighborhoods at night safely.
We need a Jesus revolution. For those who might dismiss this as religion, Franzese is clear: he hates religion. But for those who would deny what he's saying, they're ignorant—not in a demeaning way, but ignorant of who Jesus of Nazareth actually was. He challenges anyone with the courage: read the New Testament about Jesus. Read everything credible about Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the man.
We need a Jesus revolution because the world, your city, your community, your neighborhood, your town, your family, your schools—everybody will benefit from it. This world will be a better place with a Jesus revolution because Jesus was the only true, honorable, great, wonderful, perfect man who ever walked the face of the earth in every aspect of His character.
If you're not a coward and have the courage—whether you're an atheist, a Jew, an agnostic, whatever—read about Jesus, because your salvation depends on it. Franzese believes this point blank. Nobody's paying him to say it. If he didn't believe it, he wouldn't say it. He's not going to mislead anyone because he's not going to hell for anybody—not for Donald Trump, not for Charlie Kirk, not for his wife, his children, his grandchildren. He'll die for his family, but he won't go to hell for them. Big difference.
Charlie Kirk showed us all that death can come at any time, somehow, someway. Everyone will die. There is an eternity. Where are you going? Eternity is never-ending, incomprehensibly long. Do you want joy in paradise or do you want hell? Don't be a tough guy claiming you'll take hell—you'll regret it for all eternity.
Franzese doesn't want to see anybody going to hell. He wants everyone following Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the man. If men, women, and children follow Him, this world will be a better place. He's come to that conclusion not only through research and knowledge, but through his experience with the Lord over 30 years—not only in his own life, but witnessing transformation in others. And he was a mobster, a sinful mobster, before encountering Christ.
Final Words to Politicians and Parents
To politicians: Wise up. You're in a position of grace. People put you there. You're nobody special. You have an awesome responsibility—live up to it. Take care of the people. Do things right. Be honorable. That's what you were put there for. Not to be underhanded and abusive, not to develop such an ego and narcissism that you never want to give up your position, not to let your hateful dialogue and rhetoric cause people to die, and not to let your misguided policies cause harm. Wake up. You're worse than the mob, Franzese says. The mob was at least confined. Politicians have control over the whole country.
Wake up and do it right before it's too late for every one of you. We are going to pay for our sins and misdeeds, either in this life or the next. We have a chance to clean it up here. In eternity, you don't.
To parents: Watch who your kids are speaking to. Watch what they're doing online. What are they listening to? Who's radicalizing them? Who's getting into their heads? Who's misleading them? Parents must watch their kids. It's another way to be safe.
Be safe. Be healthy. Men, be protectors of your women. Teach your kids the right way. Make them aware of their surroundings. And when Franzese says "God bless," he means it as a prayer. You don't have to ramble in prayer—you acknowledge God, ask Him for something, thank Him for something. It can be one word: "Thank you, Lord."
God bless each and every person listening. God bless your families, your communities, your neighborhoods, your neighbors. God bless everyone in your surroundings. God bless your enemies that they come to their senses. God bless relatives you may be separated from over ideological views or politics, that they come to their senses. God bless government officials that they come to their senses and start doing the right thing for the people who elected them. God bless those undergoing emotional stress with transgenderism, especially at a young age—may they understand and be comfortable in their bodies, mature enough to make decisions if needed.
Turn to Jesus. He is our savior. Jesus is a win-win situation here on earth and forever in all of eternity.
Video Transcript
This may not be true. How can we trust the government? There is a cover up. Israel is involved. Trump is involved. This is a cover up. They're creating this evidence. Those theories are coming around. I know about hits. I'm looking at what I see here at the evidence so far. This is not a professionally backed hit. There is no evidence that there was tremendous financial support for this. The only thing that I think about here is how did this kidda get away 4 hours away in such quick time. I do not support Israel or any other nation killing innocent people in Gaza. There have been reports that that's happening, but it doesn't sound good. It doesn't appear good. It doesn't look good. And could I absolutely see a connection between Israeli intelligence and Epstein? Hey everyone, welcome to another sitdown with Michael Francis. Hope everybody is doing well. All is very good, very blessed on this end, my friends. And as always, I give all the praise, honor, glory, and thanksgiving to my God for that. And people, what's the main story going on right now? 24/7, everywhere you look, whether it be on television, on the news, on social media, it's all about Charlie Kirk. Who killed Charlie Kirk? What were the circumstances surrounding it? Why did it happen? It's all we're hearing. Before I get into that, because I have a lot to say about this today, it's several days later. We have more information, but there's so many theories flying around about so many things that I want to get into. But let me say this. Saturday, this Saturday, September 20th, I'm doing a live stream. Don't miss it. I want you all to participate in this. It's in a tremendous, tremendous live stream. Tremendous in its importance. We need you to jump on board. That's all I'm going to say at this point. This Saturday, September 20th, jump on board our live stream. It'll be on YouTube and Rumble. You got to hear it. All this stuff about uh Charlie Kirk, first of all, let me tell you, I was devastated over it. Devastated. No matter what anybody wants to say, I was devastated. This is a 31-year-old father, husband who is on college campuses throughout the country trying to debate and have open and honest conversation with young people. Something we desperately need in this country. Open and honest conversations. It's okay to disagree. But if you have a way about you that you believe you're right and you can convince people that your way of thinking is right, what's wrong with that? And if somebody else can convince you otherwise, nothing wrong with that. That's what we need to be doing, not what's happening now. All this vitrial, all this hatred spewing out from the top. I've said this many times. Obviously, it's from the top. It trickles down to people, people that might be emotionally upset, unbalanced, influenced, radicalized, whatever. And they lash out the way they did with Charlie Kirk. And this is not the only example. I'm not going to get into all of them, but let's try to talk about this. There's theories going around now. As the days continue to go by, we start to hear things from prominent people, too. Of course, you hear a lot online. You know, lunatics, Trump killed him and this kill and you hear so many different he killed himself, whatever. You hear all of these different things. A lot of this, I'm sorry, on social media, you just got to dismiss. People talk and talk and talk and half of them, they just ramble. They don't really know what they're talking about. It's unfortunate, but it's the truth. Let's call it like it is. But there's some things going around. I've taken notes. I've researched it and I want to break it down and I want to go to all the possibilities here. And I want to talk about Israel also. There's a reason for that. Stay tuned because you're going to need to hear what I'm going to say about Israel. Please stay tuned. And let's get into this. First, let's the question, who killed Charlie Kirk? That's what we need to know. Now, the obvious is out there. There's this 20 year 22year-old Tyler Robinson that allegedly pulled the trigger. Let's see what evidence we have leading up to the law enforcement coming to that conclusion. Let's talk about it. First, let me say this. Tyler Robinson has been formally charged with aggravated murder and faces the death penalty. And in Utah, the death penalty is still by firing squad. Prosecutors filed seven charges against Robinson on September 16th, 2025, including aggravated murder, weapons offenses, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. And that's only the state of Utah. This is the evidence that we now have against Robinson. There are multiple pieces of evidence that link Robinson to the crime. One, we have DNA evidence. Robinson's DNA was found on the trigger of the rifle used to kill Kirk as well as on a screwdriver found on the rooftop and a towel that allegedly wrapped the murder weapon. DNA evidence. Pretty powerful. We know that. I have experience with that. Pretty powerful. There are text messages. Robinson reportedly sent text messages to his roommate confessing to the shooting stating I had enough of his hatred regarding Kirk. Three discord confession. Robinson appeared to confess on Discord, writing, quote, "It was me." Just hours before surrendering to the police. And then the physical evidence. palm prints were found at the edge of the roof where the shooter escaped and a footprint showing Converse sneakers was discovered. Now, this is the hard evidence that they have to this point. Now, there's going to be some theorists out there that are saying this may not be true. How can we trust the government? There is a cover up. Israel is involved. Trump is involved. This is a cover up. They're creating this evidence. Those theories are coming around. Go on social media. you'll see them now. Not really him. You know, unfortunately, we're at a state or a position with our government that it's very hard to believe almost anything. But let's take this at face value and say, okay, to this point, there is enough evidence suggesting or pointing to Tyler Robinson if it's all accurate and true. Let's move on. Let's talk a little bit about Tyler himself. Tyler Robinson did grow up in a right-wing family. conservatives, Utah Mormons, no doubt his parents and extended family are staunchly Republican and have been described as supporters of Donald Trump and the broader MAGA movement. Now, because of this, immediately immediately people jumped online, the Trump haters, and said, "Aha, it's a right-winger that killed him." The theory that it was the left, no, that's wrong. It was a right-winger that killed him. They immediately jumped on that. Why? Because they don't do their research. They don't wait. They don't wait a moment to see as the evidence pours in, does it say something else? They just hate Trump so much they jump right on it. And obviously, they were wrong. And we'll move forward and we'll show you that. My friends, there's a fight that's happening right now. And it's one that threatens the most vulnerable among us. And I've decided to step into it. Not tomorrow, not someday, but right now. On September 20th, I'll be going live to share something that I've never shared before. And I want you all there with me live. For those who stand with me, I want you there live. There'll be an exclusive opportunity at the end, something no one else will ever have the opportunity to join. So, join me for what might be the most important announcement of our lifetime. This is the fight of a lifetime, and I invite you to join. [Music] Robinson's family indicated he held left-leaning political views and had grown increasingly radical. Investigators believe Robinson was motivated by ideological disagreement with Kirk's conservative positions, particularly his views on transgender people, which may have been personal since Robinson's roommate is a transgender. Okay, so those on the left didn't wait until more evidence came out or more information, I should say. Fact, Robinson, Tyler Robinson, was living with a transgender roommate. this transgender now uh has been undergoing that process uh for quite some time and they were together and from what I understand they were romantically together. So Tyler Robinson was living and romantically involved with a transgender person and from what I understand that transgender person is cooperating fully with the authorities on this investigation. That's what I'm hearing. Robinson had reportedly been tracking Kirk's schedule and studying campus maps prior to the attack. That's what they found out. What else can be behind this with respect to him? Transgender related theories. Speculation that Robinson was motivated by Kirk's anti-transgender rhetoric given Robinson's transgender partner. Now, let's clarify this. Charlie Kirk was of the belief as a Christian that there are only two genders, male and female. He was against hormone therapy. He was against this transgender uh surgery in minors. He was against all of that. He didn't have hatred towards transgenders, but he openly spoke out against the transgender process. He was against transgender men competing in women in sports. So outwardly and openly, he was against transgenders in that regard. I haven't heard any hate speech from him with respect to that. But he was talking about his Christian principles that there are only two genders. Okay, that could have incited Robinson. As a matter of fact, I think we can we can assume or conclude that yeah, that was a problem. And maybe that's one of the reasons why he lashed out. Let's continue. Reports of bullet engravings with transgender and anti-fascist ideology, though these were later questioned. Were they really on there? Who knows? But that's what we've seen on the bullet casings. At least that's what's been reported. Left-wing uh attribution. Trump blamed radical left rhetoric for the violence, stating those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis. Well, listen, we know this has been going on for years. Trump's a Nazi. Trump's a fascist. Trump's going to destroy democracy. You know, we got to get rid of these people. There's been a lot of violent and hateful rhetoric targeting Trump in particular and many people on the right. That's a fact. I'm not being biased here. I'm just reporting the facts. Does it go the other way? I'm sure it does. But has it yet gone to the level where people are killing each other? I don't know. I haven't really seen that. Now, we can talk about the two Democrats, the politicians that were killed in their house, husband and wife. Horrible. absolutely horrible and whoever did that should be held accountable. Why they did it, I don't know. I'm not learned or knowledgeable enough about that to comment. But it was horrible. Obviously, obviously, we don't support anything like that. None whatsoever. But we have to be honest. The word Nazi, the word fascist, the word danger to democracy has all been coming from the left, mostly targeting Donald Trump. It's been happening for years. All the major people have said it from Biden to Harris to to uh Adam Schiff to Elizabeth Warren to AOC to Bernie Sanders, you know, to to Schumer. All of them have been saying it and the media has been saying it. You can't dispute that because it's there. It's right in front of you. Look it up. So, I'm not making this up. I'm only saying that's where this has come from. No question about it. Farright and Groper claims some conspiracy theorist theorists attempted to link the assassination to the Groper movement and far-right activist Nick Fuentes because Kirk had long-standing conflicts with Gropers. Messages found on bullet casings appeared to reference Groper memes and anti-fascist themes. But Fuentes has publicly rejected these speculations claiming his group is being framed. Okay, it's another theory out there. Fuentes is against it. He's saying he's being framed, but it's another theory that is out there. A theory is one thing. Is there evidence to support that? The investigation is ongoing. Will that come out? I don't know. Too early to speculate at this point. We know what we have and we know what people are saying, but what people are saying has to be supported by some kind of evidence before we give any credence to it. Okay. Now, we get into something totally different. As far as who killed Charlie Kirk, we have professional hit and government theories, listen to this, high-profile figures like Roger Stone, somebody that I had on my show who I happen to to like, have suggested, again without real evidence that Kirk's killing was a professional hit, possibly orchestrated by a nation state, rogue government elements, or a terrorist group. Okay, I'm going to get into this more deeply. This is where Israel comes in, but I'm going to get into it more deeply. I know about hits. I'm looking at what I see here at the evidence so far. This is not a professionally backed hit. It's just not. We had a young kid that had experience shooting guns. He was a a hunter. He had a rifle capable of hitting somebody at 200 yards and he had a telescopic lens and he knew how to use the gun. There is no evidence that there was tremendous financial support for this. The only thing that I think about here is how did this kid get away 4 hours away in such quick time? He got off the building, got in the car, boom, he was gone. Went through the the woods where he dropped the gun and the screwdriver and he was gone. Did anybody help him get away? Was there somebody else involved? We're not seeing that yet, but I think those questions have to be um investigated and I'm sure they're investigating that now. But is this some major supported hit by a government? Was this like JFK? I don't know. I I don't see it at this point. I'm not seeing anything to suggest that that there was some big nation state behind this, that there was some huge conspiracy and he had so much help financially and there were other people alongside him there that helped him get away and helped him set it up. I don't see that yet. I'm not discounting it, but I'm not seeing it. And I think all of you can look at it and tell me if you see something different. If you see something different based upon what we have seen so far, let me know. I want to consider it. But I don't see it. Right now, this me seems to be a young kid. Now, I will say this. He might have had people online on social media in some of these dark, cold places pushing not only him, but others that didn't like Charlie Kirk, getting to them to the fever point where, yeah, I want to kill this guy. There are people on this side of social media that could be doing this subtle influence, maybe not so subtle, and you get the wrong person like a Tyler Robinson who's heard it online, who's heard it online, who's heard it from the top, who's living with a transgender, all of a sudden I'm going to get rid of this guy. It's a noble thing that I'm doing. So, could he have had support in that regard? And could it have been calculated when messages came back to whoever it was on the other side saying, "Hey, I got somebody here. He's communicating with me." And I think we can push this guy to the limit. I hope you follow me and you understand what I'm saying. Then maybe that's possible. Maybe there were bad actors out there that didn't like Charlie Kirk and they're spreading that in these online chat rooms that they have, whatever they call them. And you get somebody like Tyler and you keep pushing him because he's responding to you and yeah, it's making sense. I might have this guy. I got to take a glass of wine. This is, by the way, non-alcoholic. I enjoy it. I've been drinking quite a bit of it. Fran's wine. So, that's a possibility, but I don't see any big elaborate scheme here with nations supporting him. So, Roger, I have to disagree with you at this point. And if there's evidence that starts to come out or that they uncover, because I understand the FBI has every possible resource investigating this right now, well then we'll find out. But I don't see it at this point. Trump related claims. Some ex users blame Trump for Kirk's death, claiming the shooting could have been orchestrated by Trump to distract from Epstein files and provide pretext for martial law, the New Republic. I reject this. I totally reject it. I cannot see Trump orchestrating the death of Charlie Kirk because of this. There's other people he could have killed they didn't like. Could have killed AOC when she was on door or he could have killed Bernie Sanders. Don't like them. Why Charlie Kirk? I'm not buying that. That's X and that's all this stuff on social media. I'm sorry. I'm not buying it. And it's not because I'm a Trump supporter. I'm just not buying it. Now, if you want to get into the Epstein stuff, I'm going to get into that. But right now, I'm not buying this. Trump did not orchestrate the killing of Charlie Kirk to hide or cover up the Epstein files or his plan to take over martial law and take over every city in the country by use of the military. And I've said this in one of my lives. If Trump wanted to use the military as a pretext, okay, sending them into places like Washington DC, Chicago, Memphis to stamp out the crime, but it was only a pretext to later send them in to control every city in the country. Well, he would be the first one that would want to take our guns away because he wouldn't want us to be able to defend ourselves against the military with our guns. It doesn't make sense. He's not for that. He upholds that amendment. We have the right to bear arms. Trump is not against it. So that theory immediately falls apart. Makes no sense. It's ridiculous. He would be calling for gun control instead of rejecting it. So I don't want to hear that. Common sense. Common sense. So I reject the Trump theory that he orchestrated Charlie Kirk's. That's the lunacy as far as I'm concerned. Now let's get into something that's very deep. And this is what Candace Owens has claimed about Israel and Epstein connection. And I have a lot of respect for Candace Owens. She's a very, very bright woman. I'm not saying I agree with everything, but I respect her very much. She's very bright, very, very smart. She does her work, and I don't think she just shoots from the hip. I know she doesn't. So, let's hear what she has to say. Owens alleged on her podcast and social media that Charlie Kirk faced increasing pressure from pro-Israel contributors and groups to change his stance or silence dissenting opinions about Israel's policies. Netanyu on Charlie Kirk. Benjamin Netu shares memories of Charlie Kirk. He was once in a generation. Okay, let me give you some context to this. There are talks going around and I think there is something that supports this that in recent weeks, months, Charlie Kirk was beginning to question beginning to question Israel's uh efforts in Gaza. And let me make this perfectly clear, people, my position. I don't care if it's Israel, the United States, any nation in the world, any race, any color, any creed. I do not want to see anybody killing innocent people in Gaza or anywhere else. If in fact Israel is killing innocent Gazas, I condemn them for it. I condemn them for it. And I'm a Christian. And I'm going to get into whether or not Israel, Israelites, I should say, are God's chosen people. Biblically, I want to talk about that because it's in context here and it's very important. All right. But I do not support Israel or any other nation killing innocent people in Gaza. There have been reports that that's happening. We have some kind of evidence that that is happening. I don't want to see it happen. And if Charlie Kirk began to question that the same way Tucker began to question it, the same way Candace Owen began to question it, well, they have a right to. Nothing wrong with that. If that's the way their thinking is, okay, Charlie Kirk has been a big supporter of Israel and he said it out there publicly for years, supported Israel. That doesn't mean he supports everything that Israel does. You know, if Israel, we're going to talk about this in depth, if the Israelites are God's chosen people, that doesn't necessarily mean that it's Israel right or wrong. Remember, God rebuked and punished Israel many times in the Old Testament. He let them wander in the desert for 40 years because they were disobedient to him. There are plenty of of passages in the Bible that show that God was unhappy with Israel. But yet, he does say they're his chosen people. I'm going to get into that. Please stick with me here. This is important because I want to clarify some things. Candace suggested billionaire Bill Aman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu orchestrated a quote tense intervention with Kirk a month before his death using threats and blackmail tactics to pressure him. According to both her own podcast and references to reporting by the Greyzone, Candace Owens clip on Acriman's text messages. We'll put it up. You'll see it. Now, I have no reason to disbelieve this. You know who Bill Aman is? Billionaire has ties to Blackstone, Jewish. I could very easily see him going to Charlie Kirk and saying, "Hey, why are you all of a sudden questioning Israel and their position on Gaza? Why are you doing that? Stop. You need to stop that." Because Charlie Kirk had always been a very strong supporter of Israel. So, Bill Aman could have been went there and got very upset. Hey, you stop it or we're cutting off all our funds to Turning Point. Could this have happened? Sure, I can believe that. And Candace Owens said it happened. She said she had text messages back and forth with Charlie Kirk. I don't think she's a liar. I don't think she's all of a sudden going against Israel for whatever. That makes sense to me. And why should we not question Israel if there's reason to? They're not superior to us. Even if they're God's chosen people, and I'm going to explain that, stick with me, doesn't mean they're superior to us. Not in any way, shape, or form. Owens hinted on multiple platforms that Kirk's shift on some issues related to Israel led to mounting behindthe-scenes pressure. And though she never directly accused Israel of orchestrating the murder, her insinuations fueled a wave of conspiracy theories online. Megan Kelly on pressure. Megan Kelly brought it up and um and a few other people. Now, let me say this at this point. I just made reference to this a few minutes ago. I don't see any elaborate plan by Israel or any other nation with respect to this assassination of Charlie Kirk. I'm looking at the facts as we see it. We looked at the videotape. We're finding out the evidence that's come forward. We see this is a 22year-old kid. He was living with a transgender. I don't think there was any direct involvement. Nobody went up to him and say, "Hey, I'm going to give you x amount of dollars if you go and assassinate Charlie Kirk." Whether it be subtly, whether it be whatever, I don't believe that that happened at this point. If evidence comes out to the contrary, I'll say okay. But to this point, there is no evidence pointing to that. And even if people are saying, "Oh, Charlie had a blowout with uh with uh with Acrian and with Netanyu, and all of a sudden he's killed. He's murdered a few weeks later." Okay. I I All right. But is there evidence of that at this point? I don't see it. I'm sorry. I do not see it. So, I can't state that. Could they have had a blowup? Absolutely. Could have Netanyu been upset that all of a sudden a strong supporter with a big big big powerful influence that Netanyu also supported is all of a sudden questioning Israel and their involvement in Gaza. What are they doing? I could see him getting upset. I could see Aman getting upset. Yeah, but tying that to the murder, that's a stretch at this point. There's a real gap in that that there's no evidence to fulfill that gap at this point. Let's keep going. Now, this is interesting. We're going to talk about Epstein. Kirk's public remarks on Epstein and Israel. Charlie Kirk was overly overtly vocal about connections between Jeffrey Epstein and alleged Israeli intelligence, including Mossad, and became much more critical of Israel in his last few months. These comments have significantly fueled conspiracy theories about the motives behind his assassination. Now, there have been or there has been a lot of speculation about Mossad and Epstein and some powerful figures being involved with with Jeffrey Epstein. We have the Gizlane Maxwell connection. Her father was Mossad or closely related to Mossad. We have Epstein dealing with a number of people that may have had ties to Israel and MSAD. We have this seemingly invulnerability for such a long time of Epstein. Can we see a possible tie there? Yeah, I think we can. Let's continue. Kirk at the 2025 Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa directly speculated about Epstein being connected to foreign intelligence agencies naming M16, Saudi or MSAD, and said he would guess Mossad, citing Epstein's link to Gizlane Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell, has widely reported connections to Israel's intelligence. So Charlie Kirk was starting to question, was Epstein involved with MSAD? Is that why he was protected? Is there really an Israeli connection here? I can see him questioning that. I have questions, too. Absolutely. So now, is Israel becoming increasingly upset because Charlie is starting to say, "Hey, something's not right here." And he starts to question it. leads to the Bill Arian meeting in the Hamptons just a few weeks before he was murdered. Okay, let's keep going. He spoke at length, Charlie did, with Megan Kelly and Tucker Carlson about the theory that Epstein ran blackmail operations on behalf of Israeli intelligence targeting American political and business elites. I'm sorry people, but I have to say that that's a possibility. No doubt. if he was an Israeli agent, and I wouldn't discount that at all, and he was luring people to his island, Americans, powerful Americans, billionaire Americans, politically connected Americans, luring them to his den of iniquity on that island, videotaping them, getting them in compromising positions so that Israel can have power over America. Is it possible? I'd have to say yeah. I can see that as being possible because of this cloud or shroud of secrecy around Epstein. Something's not right there. It's just not right. I've said it all along. The fact that Trump was so adamant adamant about releasing the files and then we know what was been going on. They haven't been released in their entirety yet. There's questions about Gizlane Maxwell being moved to, you know, a cushiony prison camp. There's a lot of stuff that makes you think. I'm sorry. Without accusing anybody directly, I'm not accusing Trump. I'm not accusing anybody directly. But it doesn't sound good. It doesn't appear good. It doesn't look good. And could I absolutely see a connection between Israeli intelligence and Epstein? Yes, I can. I'm sorry. Yes, I can. Kirk called for greater transparency about Epstein's death and connections, describing government coverups and hinting that powerful interests, including possibly Israeli state actors, were protecting secrets about Epstein's activities. Somebody's protecting these secrets. There's more to it that we haven't seen. And I'm telling you right now, I would stake just about everything I have on it. I do not believe that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide and I have a good basis for that non-belief. I was on that tier and in that cell and I spent 29 months and 7 days in solitary confinement much of that in the federal system in the exact same kind of jail cell that Jeffrey Epstein was in. And I in fact was on that tier in MDC in 1986 uh 85 and 86. I spent seven months there, so I know what I'm talking about. I don't believe that he committed suicide. I don't believe he could have committed suicide. So, what happened to Jeffrey Epstein? Is it part of the cover up? It's speculation, but it's speculation based upon a lot of circumstantial evidence. Some commentators claim to have inside knowledge of Kirk warning, "Israel will kill me if I turn against them." A narrative promoted by fringe influencers on X and Telegram. I don't see any factual information to support that. You got to question people on X. You got to question people on YouTube that make these comments. Some of these influence, I'm sorry, just want to get views and they'll say almost anything to get people's attention or they hear something that might be a germ of something and they take it to the next level like it's fact. I don't know if Charlie ever made those statements. It's not coming out anywhere else. Let me read it again. Some commentators claim to have inside knowledge of Kirk warning Kirk that now this is Charlie Kirk saying this quote, "Israel will kill me if I turn against them." And this is a narrative promoted by fringe influencers on X and Telegram. And there are a lot of fringe influencers and many of them don't like Israel. Let's call it like it is. We have a lot of anti-semitism on everywhere. It appears everywhere in this country. But I can't place any credence in that because we don't have anything of substance to back it up. We have substance to back up the Bill Aman being upset with Charlie Kirk. We have substance to back up that ch that Jeffrey Epstein could have been working for Assad. We have substance circumstantially to support in some way the fact that there was a cover up because Israel might have control over important figures in this country. Who they are, I don't know. I can't name them. Of course, we're going to think Trump right away. I'm not saying that. I can't say that because I want to tell you this people. I would not accuse anybody of pedophilia unless I had information that was strong enough because it's disgusting. It's horrible. It's despicable. I don't even want to think of it. And unless I had information that says, "Yeah, you were it." And I'd spit in the guy's face. No matter who it is, I have seven kids, seven grandchildren. I happen to love kids, young girls to abuse them. I don't care who it is. And you can hold me to that. I wouldn't I wouldn't name anybody for doing such a despicable act unless I had some really strong evidence to the fact that they did that. Kirk's sudden silence after receiving a reported call from President Trump. Now this has been said. Kirk abruptly stopped talking about Epstein, publicly saying that he would quote trust his friends in the administration to do what needs to be done, which fed additional speculation and skepticism among supporters. Now, Charlie Kirk did make that statement. Did he have that phone call with Trump? I don't know that for a fact, but it's being reported. Am I discounting it? No. Am I saying it it's an absolute fact? No. I don't know. Am I saying it could have happened? Yes, it could have happened because Charlie did make that statement. He did back off the Epstein uh matter. He did back off. Why did he back off? Maybe there's some credence to this. But again, the whole the whole Epstein mess, it's such a mess. It's so ugly that we have to question everything. I'm sorry, but we have to. I don't think the truth is ever going to come out, especially if this whole Israeli theory is true. Because if Israel does have dirt on prominent figures here in the United States, whether they be in government or in high corporate America, we're not going to find out. I'm sorry. Does that give Israel control over America? We can form our own conclusions on that to a degree. Again, we can form our own conclusions on that because let me tell you something. I've said this many times. Those of us that are accusing Trump, if Biden administration had information on Trump, that he in any way engaged in pedophilia, abusing young girls, and they could have released it, they would have released it. They hate Trump enough to do that. That's why I don't believe it either exists because they would have used it or it's being covered up at such a high level not only to protect Trump but to protect a lot of people, Democrats, Republicans, independents, whatever people in power because remember this degenerate Jeffrey Epstein was doing this for decades. God knows how many people he brought to that island and to his house, his apartment, his condo, wherever in New York. God knows how many people that he could have information on. I don't know. To me, it's ugly. It's disgusting. And I don't think we'll ever find out. So, that concludes this. So, what do I what do we conclude by what I'm saying here? Now, right now, as far as I'm concerned, the evidence that I have seen points to this, Tyler Robinson was the shooter. I think there's enough evidence to support that and all of it that I just mentioned. I can't believe because of what I've seen so far, there was any major sophistication, a state, a government, a powerful person, whatever, behind this assassination. It just doesn't show. The only question in my mind, how the heck did he get away so quick? Did somebody help him? Does he have an accomplice here? He might, but I don't think it's going to be anyone at a high level in government or anything else. I'm just not seeing it. I'm sorry. And I'm not covering anything for anybody. I don't see it. If you disagree with me, disagree with me, but support it by either a good theory or by some facts that maybe I'm unaware of. Although I've been watching this very closely. Let me get to Israel. This is extremely important and I want to clarify something about Israel. I started you in the beginning. I'm going to finish it now. Are the Israelites God's chosen people according to the Old Testament? Yes, they are. Let me read the verses. Now, some of you, we don't believe the Bible at all. The Bible is a myth. It's this, it's that. Let's take it for a moment on face value that the Bible is real. As a Christian, I believe it's 1,000% real. And billions of other Christians, Catholics, we all believe the same. But let's take it on face value right now. For those of you that are non-believers, let's say it's true. The reporting is true. So let's go to the Old Testament and let's talk about this about Israel being God's chosen people. Speaking of the nation of Israel and this is in uh the book of Deuter Deuteronomy 7-9. It tells us this quote the Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were numerous than other peoples for you were the fewest of all peoples. But it was because the Lord loved you and kept the oath he swore to your forefathers, meaning Abraham, that he brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the land of slavery, from the power of Pharaoh, king of Egypt. Know therefore that the Lord your God is God. He is the faithful God, keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commands. Now listen, God chose the nation of Israel to be the people through whom Jesus Christ would be born. That's what God means when Israel were his chosen people. Let me repeat. God chose the nation of Israel to be the people through whom Jesus Christ would be born, the savior from sin and death. John 3:16. God first promised the Messiah after Adam and Eve's fall into sin. Genesis chapter 3. God later confirmed that the Messiah would come from the line of Abraham, who was a Jew, uh, an Israelite, um, Isaac and Jacob. And these are Abraham's seeds, Isaac and Isaac's son, Jacob. And that's Genesis 12:13. Jesus Christ is the ultimate reason why God chose Israel to be his special people. God did not need to have a chosen people, but he decided to do it that way. Jesus had come had to come from some nation of people and God chose Israel. So there could be different interpretations of this. There are biblical scholars out there that know a lot more than me that have studied the Bible intensely over decades of time and can interpret it. But I'm doing it from a lay perspective. I've read my Bible. I'm in intimately aware of it. It states in many cases, I'm only talking about one one one particular part of the Bible here, a few verses, but in many verses, it says that the Israelites are God's chosen people. And what they were really chosen for was to bring forth the Messiah, Jesus Christ. That was what they were chosen to do. Now, let's continue. This is very important here. However, God's reason for choosing the nation of Israel was not solely for the purpose of producing the Messiah. God's desire for Israel were that they would go and teach others about him. Israel was to be a nation of priests, of prophets, and missionaries to the world. God's intent was for Israel to be a distinct people, a nation who pointed others towards God and his promised provision of a redeemer, Messiah, and Savior. For the most part, Israel failed in this task. Did you hear what I just said? For the most part, Israel failed in this task. However, God's ultimate purpose for Israel, that of bringing the Messiah into the world, was fulfilled perfectly in the person of Jesus Christ. So, that's what God chose Israel for. Now, I'm going to continue. There's more to it. There's more to it. Listen to this. Are the go are the Jews still God's chosen people? That's the question. Let me read. To answer this, it must first be determined what is meant by chosen. It certainly doesn't mean that these people are a special race privileged above all others because they are more righteous. No. They're more smarter. No. Or handsomemer than others. No. Their history reveals human frailties and susceptibility to the carnal nature as much as any other people groups. Remember, they were chosen to bring the Messiah into the world and they did that in Jesus Christ. In fact, the Jews exhibited such wickedness that God once purposed to wipe them out. They were rebellious against the Lord. They were rebellious against the Lord from the very first. And that's Deuteronomy 9:24 tells us that. And their unfaithfulness to the Lord was demonstrated throughout their subsequent history in the Old Testament. Hosea 9:1 tells us that but from the very foundation of the earth God had a plan of redemption in mind and he needed a people group through which to work it out. Abraham and his descendants were chosen to be that means by which the whole world would be able to be saved. Their choseness lies in their job not their spiritual DNA. This is very important. Now let me get through this and I'm going to explain this to you. They were chosen to bring the Messiah to the earth. Galatians 3:16 G I'm sorry, Galatians chapter 3:16 to18 and verse 24 say this was the purpose of the Abrahamic covenant. Period. So let me clarify this again. God chose the people of Israel to bring the Messiah Jesus Christ. Now let's get into this a little deeper. as because of that we as Christians do support Israel. We do because they did bring our Messiah, the savior of the world, who we believe nobody gets to the father, nobody gets to heaven except through Jesus Christ. I believe that with all my heart based upon the evidence of scripture and evidence that supports that scripture is real. I believe it. No question about it. I'm not a perfect Christian, but my faith is perfect in that regard. I believe it. Nobody can tell me any different. Am I open to listen? Of course. But I've listened for 30 years, and nobody's been able to tell me a different argument. And I've heard all the debates from from agnostics to atheists to anybody else. Doesn't hold water. Jesus is the savior of the world brought to us by God's chosen people, the Israelites. Now having said that, remember this. The Jews reject Jesus as being the Messiah. They don't believe it. They believe him to be a prophet. And they believe that God is still coming. They don't believe Jesus is the savior of the world. They rejected him. So God chose them to bring Jesus here, but they rejected Jesus. So what does that say now? Are they still God's chosen people? Well, biblically, yes, for the reason of bringing the Messiah here. So, we support them in that regard. But like I said earlier, God I I should say the Israelites came out of favor with God many times. He almost wanted to annihilate the whole race. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah? He wanted to annihilate all of them. He was upset with them many times. So, it's not Israel right or wrong. Israel is not above reproach. We don't support Israel no matter what they do. And if Israel is wreaking havoc on Gaza, and they shouldn't be, and they're killing innocent people, we're not supposed to support that. And we won't. We will not. And there's a lot of questions about Israel doing some things that are shady. We're not going to support that. I'm not. And Christians won't either. It's not Israel right or wrong. God did not teach us that. The Bible does not show us that. And like I said, they weren't chosen because they were holier or smarter or brighter or more spiritual. No, they were chosen because that's who God chose. That's his right to bring the Messiah into the world. Jesus was a Jew. He was Mary and Joseph were Jews. They were. So in that regard, they're chosen. But it's not Israel right or wrong. God does not teach us that about anybody, about any race. Christians not right or wrong. So we need to understand that and we need to understand what is meant by God's chosen people. So the fact that Jeffrey Epstein did what he did, the despicable nature of that guy, do we support him because he was a Jew? Absolutely not. If the Jews are annihilating people in Gaza and that new is behind this, do we support him? Absolutely not. So let's get this straight once and for all. And don't condemn Christians for saying the Jews are the chosen people because they are. And because of the fact that they brought us our Messiah, that God ordained them to bring us our Messiah, the savior of the world, well, yeah, we'll support them. But if they're doing wrong, we're going to call them out on it, and we're not going to support them. And I think that I'm big biblically supported in saying this. So, I hope we clarify this whole Israeli thing and what it really means by that. God doesn't support any sin from anybody. no matter who they are. So, keep that in mind, people. You know, this whole thing is so ugly. It really is. Get thirsty when I talk so much. It's so ugly. And I'm just going to leave it off by this, you know. First of all, please do come on to my live stream this Saturday. It's extremely important and you're going to see why. We need a lot of help in this country, in this world. But let's talk about our country here, the United States. We need a lot of help. People are being abused. And we need to support anything that's going to stop the the abuse. You need to come on and listen to what I have to say. It's vitally important. Whatever I tell you, I'm going to back it up. It's vitally important. We need everybody to be involved in everybody. There shouldn't be a person out there that disagrees with anything that I'm going to say. It's vital. I want to see peace in this country. I don't want to see another murder. I don't want to see a left being murdered. I don't want to see anybody on the right being murdered. I want to see anybody in between being murdered. Murder is bad. Violence is bad. I don't want to see storefronts being burned down or being looted. I want people to be able to walk their neighborhoods at night. We have to do something here. There's no question about it. This is this is not We need a Jesus revolution. And for those of you that don't bring it's not religion. Don't give me the word religion. I hate religion. But for those of you that would deny what I say when I say a Jesus revolution, you're ignorant. And I'm not saying that to be demeaning. You're ignorant of the man that Jesus of Nazareth was. And I challenge you. If you got the balls, you got the courage, and you're not a coward, read the New Testament about Jesus. Read everything that's credible about Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus the man. Read about him. And that's why we need a Jesus revolution because this world, your city, your community, your neighborhood, your town, your family, your schools, everybody will benefit from it. this world will be a better place with a Jesus revolution because he was the only true, honorable, great, wonderful, perfect man that ever walked the face of the earth in every aspect of his character. So, I'm putting it out there and if you're not a coward and you got the balls, whether you're an atheist or whatever the hell you are, a Jew, an agnostic, whatever you are, if you got the nerve to read it because your salvation depends upon it. I'm telling you point blank. And if I didn't believe it, nobody's paying me to do this. If I didn't believe it, I wouldn't say it. I'm not going to mislead you because I said this in a YouTube. I'm not going to hell for anybody. Not for anybody. Not for Donald Trump. Not for Charlie Kirk. Not for any Not for my wife, my daughter, my sons, my grandchildren. I'm not going to hell for anybody. I'll die for them. My wife, my kids, my grandchildren. I'll die for them. I'm not going to hell for them. Big difference. And I make that claim for all of you. You need to brush up because people, let me tell you something. Charlie Kirk showed us this last week. Everybody's going to die somehow someway. That time is coming. And there is an eternity. Where are you going? You know what eternity is? Do you know what it is? We can't even comprehend what eternity is, but it is. It's never ending. Do you want joy in paradise or do you want hell? whatever form it turns out to be. And don't throw your chest out and be a tough guy. I'll take hell. No, you won't. You'll take it until you get there and then you'll regret every second for all of eternity. People, this is passion coming out of me. I don't want to see anybody going to hell. I don't. And I want to see everybody following Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the man. Follow him. men, women, children, this world will be a better place. I've come to that conclusion. And I was a mobster, a sinful mobster. And I've come to that conclusion, not only through my research, my knowledge, but my experience with the Lord over the last 30 years, not only with me, but with others. I'm going to end it, people. You know how I get passionate with this? Because I don't like what's going on. I don't like it on either side of the aisle. You politicians, wisen up. I don't know who the hell some of you think you are. You're in a position of grace. People put you there. You're nobody special. You have an awesome responsibility. Live up to it. Take care of the people. Do things right. Be honorable. That's what we put you there for. not to be underhanded and abusive and not to get an ego and be so narcissistic that you never want to give up your position and that your your hateful dialogue and your hateful rhetoric causes people to die and your misguided policies cause nothing but but harm for people. Wake up. You're worse than the mob. We at least were confined. You people have control over the whole darn country. Wake up. Do it right before it's too late for every one of you. Because let me tell you something. We are going to pay for our sins and our misdeeds either in this life or the next. We have a chance to clean it up. In eternity, you don't. I've said enough people. How do I always leave you same way? Never going to change my friends. Be safe. And God said Charlie Kirk if this whole ordeal watch who you're speaking to. Watch your kids online with this stuff. What are they listening to? Who's who's radicalizing them? Who's getting into their heads? Who's misleading them? Parents, watch your kids. It's another way to be safe. Be safe. Ladies, be safe. Men, be protectors of your women. Teach your kids the right way. Make them aware of their surroundings. Be healthy. Need I say anything more? Be healthy. Be safe. Be healthy. And this is a prayer. This is a prayer. Every time I say it, this is a prayer. You don't have to ramble in a prayer. You have to acknowledge God in a prayer. Ask God for something in a prayer. Thank God for something in a prayer. You don't have to ramble to be one word. Thank you, Lord. One word. When I say this, I mean it. God bless each and every one of you. God bless your families, your communities, your neighborhoods, your neighbors themselves. God bless everyone in your surroundings that you know. God bless your enemies that they've come to their senses. God bless relatives you may have been separated from over ideological views or or politics. God bless them that they come to their senses. And God bless all of our government officials that they come to their senses and they start doing those of them that are not, they start doing the right thing for the people that elected them. And God bless those that are undergoing emotional stress with transgenderism, especially at a young age. God interceded in their emotions, in their intellect. Let them understand and be comfortable in their bodies, Lord. That's all. Be comfortable in their own bodies. And let them be mature enough to make decisions if it needs to go in a different direction. And Lord, I ask all of this in our Savior's name. And as I ask, I give thanksgiving to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. And I pray that all of you listening here today will turn towards Jesus. Turn to Jesus. He is our savior. And all you can do is benefit. Jesus is a win-win situation here on earth and forever in all of eternity. Stay tuned. I'll see you next time.
Related Books
Browse Conservative Books
