All right, guys. Welcome back to the channel for another Real Talk episode. Today, we're going to do a follow-up to the Charlie Kirk video that I put out recently and go over some more of the inconsistencies, some of the holes in the story that I'm seeing from the official narrative that the FBI and this administration, frankly, wants you to believe. And I want to follow up on a lot of the comments that people have made and further clarify some of the things I was trying to say and get across to you guys. Now, I want to go based off of a little bit of a list that I have here because again, this is a very important topic and I'm not trying to make light of the situation. In fact, quite the opposite. I think um we owe it to Charlie Kirk and and we owe it to ourselves in this country to actually find out what happened. And I have uh no hard evidence or hard proof of uh a grand conspiracy, but this is America and I believe Charlie would have stood up for our right to question the official narrative given all the information that's come out recently and the lack of information from our uh from our government and from the FBI, three-letter agencies. So, um that's pretty much what we're going to cover. We're going to go into some of the other questions again that you guys mentioned. You wanted me to elaborate on some things, so we're going to cover those as well. So, the first thing I actually want to start with is why does this matter? Because whether or not you're Republican or Democrat, you like Charlie, you didn't like Charlie, none of that actually matters. The question that I'm seeking out to answer is why would somebody want him dead? Whether you believe it was this Robinson guy, which I don't frankly, or whether you believe the complete opposite end of the spectrum, which was it was a SCOP and there's either one government or multiple government agencies involved in covering up and assassinating him because of reasons we'll get into here shortly. Whatever you believe, the fact of the matter is whoever did it wanted to sew division in our country. And we see this immediate knee-jerk reaction. Again, we're going to cover this here shortly with Pam Bodney coming out talking about uh arresting people, charging people uh because of the things that they're saying, calling calling hate speech a crime. And we're going to get into the distinction between hate speech and actual threats and and actually breaking the law versus just saying something that other people hate to hear. Uh a lot of which Charlie Kirk was accused of. Right. Now, we're seeing the same rhetoric on the on the Republican side and the conservative side in response to this. And I just want to point out that we are all as regular people, as middle class citizens of this country and of the world really, all regular people. If you don't have uh if you're not in that top 1% and you're not in the political class, it's really us versus them. And what is this type of division to sew? Again, whoever you believe was responsible for it, it doesn't matter. You see the result of what's happening. Why did they want Charlie Kirk dead? What was the result they wanted? They want infighting. Did they want us continuing to be at each other's throats so that they can continue taking power and gaining more power and more money and more control over the population? That's where my perspective come from. Again, I'm just seeking out the truth. I don't know what the truth is. I'm just asking simple questions. And if people get offended by that, why don't you just answer those questions? That's that's the simple thing to do, right? If you have an answer, answer it. And I would love to hear from you guys down in the comments about that. And now I want to talk to you guys about why I question the narrative. And that's because I grew up in the '90s with my eyes open and forget about a lot of the baseless conspiracy theories that are floating around out there. Let's talk about the actual confirmed conspiracy no longer theories, conspiracy confirms, confirmations, whatever you want to call them. And I have a few here in a list. And these are all confirmed by declassified documents from foil requests. Many of these are from over 50 to 75 years ago because most of this information does not come out until all the people who were involved are no longer living and there's no repercussions for them and they get away with it time and time again. So, first and foremost, let's just go down really quickly. You guys can take a deep dive on any one of these. Again, I can tell you for a fact these are confirmed to be true, essentially admitted to by declassified documents. Starting with Operation Northwoods, that was a proposed false flag attack on the US in 1962. So the joint chiefs of staff drafted memos proposed creating or fake attacks against civilian casualties to justify action against Cuba. So this was literally released later. The joint chiefs of staff decided that they were going to create terrorist attacks on American citizens, sacrifice them as collateral damage in order to get the American public behind going to war with Cuba. Now JFK shut that down. We saw how that resulted in his fate. Okay, moving on. Project MK Ultra. This one's very famous because it's been talked about a lot. uh CIA mind control drug experiments in the 1950s and60s. Not going to dive into every single one of these guys. I'm going to keep moving on. The Tuskegee syphilis study. This is a pretty disturbing one. The Tuskegee syphilis study. Uh this was deliberate withholding of treatment in 1932 to 1972. This went on for I mean that what is that 50 years? That's uh sorry 40 years. That's insane. Uh US Public Health Service studied the course of untreated syphilis in black men without informed consent. The study documents uh are archived and the US government formerly apologized in 1997. The US government formally apologized in 97. Yeah. So that was a real thing as well. So then you have operation mockingberg where the CIA was actively influencing and paying off journalists to shape the narrative during the cold war. Operation paperclipip. This was the recruitment of German scientists during post world war ii. This is very wellnown. A lot of NASA was actual Nazis from Germany. So that was operation paperclipip. us recruiting these scientists and getting them on our side to help us, you know, win the space race and and defeat Russia during the cold war, the USSR. You have the Iran Contra affair, the Gulf of Tonkan misrepresentation. Then you have the USS Liberty documents and that goes into Israel bombing American ship, a US ship back in 1967 and the controversy surrounding that. Um, there's a lot more that goes into every single one of these guys. My trust in the government, my trust in the official narrative has been extremely tainted by that. Not not to mention also most of the books that we learned on McGra Hill growing up were actually owned by the publication that was run by Glain Maxwell's father. So if you're not questioning the narrative at this point, I question your ability to have critical thinking and to see the world as what it is around you, right? You're still taking that blue pill and not blue as in liberal or democratic. I'm talking about blue pills and you're you're choosing to accept the narrative. You're living in the matrix versus actually taking the red pill or the black pill some people call it which is you are awake to what is actually happening. You are being manipulated. You are being controlled. Back in the day they could really control the media outlets just by purchasing them flat out. We see that again. Uh Gla Maxwell's father owned the publication company from McGraill which was all the books I learned on growing up. You could just simply buy the news radio. You could buy the TV station. You could buy the publishing company. Now it is through bots and through social media and through these algorithms you are being trained to hate the other so you cannot focus on the true enemy who continues to amass money, power, wealth and put you down further and make you an indentured servant so that you can't afford a house and you can't afford to have children. And these are all things that I think Charlie Kirk was exploring and calling out more recently. And so let's just dive right into that now that we finally got that out of the way. Why don't I trust the government? Well, um, how much time do you have? That's kind of my perspective on it. Now, I want to talk to you guys about motive real quick. Okay, so I brought up in the last video that Charlie began to ask questions that he maybe shouldn't have been asking. So, what did I mean by that? Well, we have a few clips pulled up and I want to show you guys. >> We're just heartbroken. Myself, my my wife, my family, my son, actually on his 2019 visit to Israel had lunch with him >> and his wife Erica. My son had lunch with him one time 2019. He's heartbroken. >> We're shattered first as human beings because a great human being has been taken from us. Uh he's was an extraordinary friend. Uh he u you know he he said he wrote me a letter on on May 2nd this year. He said, "One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization. A few weeks before the tragedy yesterday, I I called him and I spoke to him and I said, "Please come to Israel." I invited him to Israel. >> And sadly, that visit will not take place. But he was >> All right, I'm going to pause there for one second because there's a couple things I want to tackle. Charlie Kirk has allegedly turned BB Netanyahu down for his travel to Israel that visit. He decided not to go because that was a part of a larger fundraising effort for Israel and the Israel lobby to buy him off essentially because he was starting to question things like October 7th and whether or not Israel intelligence, Israeli intelligence had knowledge of that event and let it happen, why the response was so slow. There's a lot of videos on this. You guys can look that up yourself. But >> he was a defender of our common Judeo-Christian civilization. and he was unbelievably excited to walk in the footsteps of Jesus here. He uh he valued our bond, the bond between America and Israel. He uh you know he uh uh did so many things to defend free speech. He had his truth. He stood up for it. But he said you can you can come and debate me. He invited that debate. He certainly didn't invite the violence the horrible violence that tried to silence him. And you know this is a worldwide problem. the the people on on the, you know, on the extremes, the the Islamists, the radical Islamists and the their union with the ultra progressives. >> Take note. Okay, remember what I said at the beginning of the video. What is the agenda that they want to push? Who is going to use this tragedy? Whether they're involved or not, right? Like whether Israel is involved, I have no idea. But is Israel going to use it to their advantage? 100%. He's already tying the left wing left-wing extremists in America to uh Muslim extremists. Okay, just just take note. Just listen to what he's saying. >> Uh they often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies. Whether it's President Trump who's been almost assassinated twice or you know they try to kill me here too. So right now he's using the America's mourning of losing Charlie Kirk to relate to the American public and saying, "Hey, you guys know now you know how we feel with these uh Muslim extremists." By the way, Hamas BB's been on record talking about how he needs to keep them in power because he can control the height of the flame. Dave Smith uh famously has been talking about that and I think he did talk about that on Charlie Kirk show actually. Not 100% sure if he did or not. Definitely on Rogan, but um he's been on record saying that. So again, now he's trying to leverage this tragedy, whether they were involved or not, to get the American public on the side of Israel, saying, "Hey, you guys know how it is. Your left-wing extremists in your country just murdered one of your most beloved leaders and and uh young people in this movement. We know how it is. They're just they're they're partnering up with Hamas and all these Muslim extremists, Islamist Islamic extremists, right? Just just pay attention." Uh >> but they got Charlie Kirk and it's just heartbreaking. He looks heartbroken. I'm just kidding. He doesn't. He doesn't look heartbroken at all. >> I think Candace picked up on that, too. >> Who is they who got Charlie Kirk? We don't have to actually speak conspiracies. I'm just wondering because you said a lot there, but it really sounded like it was about BB trying to establish a narrative uh a narrative that we saw reinforced by a lot of people uh that, you know, Charlie kind of made it almost sound like he died for Israel. I mean, Trump's account even tweeted out a photo of Charlie and an an American flag and also an Israeli flag. A bit of AI used. >> That's weird. Those flags should never be crossed. The American flag is the American flag. >> This is just who Charlie was. He says Judeo-Christian values. He spoke to him two weeks ago. Again, you would think he was busy fighting this 97,000 front war, but no, he's letting you know that he just randomly what? picks up the phone and calls Charlie Kirk and invites him to Israel. >> I think it's important to note, guys, um why am I bringing this up now? Many of you guys have been watching my channel for years and you never knew my my perspective, my opinion, um my doubt in all these different events. The reason I'm bringing it up now is because they've murdered somebody that was literally out there just talking and speaking his opinion and standing on his beliefs. And that I feel like it was a direct attack on America, on the Constitution, and myself. Somebody who believes in free speech, who believes in the Second Amendment. And that's why I'm like, you know what? [ __ ] it. I'm done being silent. I don't care who agrees, who disagrees. If this turns you off, then that tells me a lot about how you think and who you are as a person. I'm not calling anybody dumb. I'm just saying, "Hey, I got a question about this. Can we not talk about this? Why can't we talk about this?" And if you can't talk about it, that's that's pretty telling. seems like maybe there's a little more to the story. No, there definitely is a little bit more to the story. First and foremost, that letter he is holding up, he is severely misrepresenting. Those sentences are real, but I am calling upon BB Netany and Yahoo, the dear friend to Charlie Kirk, to publish the letter's entire contents, like don't start with just two sentences is >> 100% taking it out of context. We're going to skip ahead a little bit. >> I'm going to do that. First, Skyler, can we bring in a clip of Charlie from a month ago speaking about the kind of pressure that he was under because I think that will also help to further contextualize this. >> Take a listen. >> I'm an American citizen. Yes, I want Israel to win. Yes, I'm a Christian. But like the some of the me and you saw you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. >> No, it's very irritating. >> It's all unfair. They were coming after you after a turning point for among other things that you had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith is allowed to criticize Israel. >> You had both sides. The Israeli side was allowed though. No, you're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I just want to repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions, not like, hey, are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no, I am a bad person if >> he's saying that with conviction. You know, he's feeling that >> I do this. And it's I I could go I mean, you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyper paranoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So, I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can, right? Like, okay, what would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in 1930s Germany online? How would I behave? So, that's like my charitable kind of over compensation. Same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb, right? >> No, it's not defensible to be dumb. and he was under an increasing amount of pressure. Uh not just people telling him, "Oh, well, you know, I'm upset with who you're inviting," but flat out telling him that he was not allowed to invite certain people to his events. They were threatening to pull out money. Uh Charlie was getting a lot of really nasty text messages and many of them pertaining to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, but Tucker Carlson was really the focus when it came to America Fest. How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place? How could he allow Dave Smith, who by the way is Jewish, how could they they allow how could Charlie allow this other position to meet the stage? because obviously when people start to hear the debates, what Dave Smith is saying sounds so rational, but it was up to Charlie to not allow those things to happen. And um those that amount of pressure towards the end as you see that hap that conversation he had with Megan was just a month before he lost his life uh really I would say reached a a pinnacle of sorts on the matter of what Tucker Carlson actually said on that stage. Tucker Carlson while he was on that stage at Turning Point brought up Bill Aman. Bill Aman is a billionaire. Obviously, he is also an extremely latgious billionaire. And Bill Aman was on Charlie about comments that Tucker Carlson had made on that stage. Tucker Carlson specifically asked the question, where does Bill Aman's money come from? You know, who is this guy actually? Who is this guy that has this much influence? And like I said, Bill Aman was not happy about this. And so I would like to contextualize BBE. Again, these are things BBE brought up publicly, which he didn't have to. He didn't have to bring up the letter. He didn't have to bring up the phone call, but he chose to do this less than 24 hours after Charlie Kirk was shot. Personally, BB, I would have appreciated if you guys used all of your spyware. You'd spying on us for years to maybe track down the killer. But I guess this is where you thought it was best to do a little propaganda for Israel. would be better than us helping us. >> All right, that's enough. Um, but clearly enough evidence to show people close to Charlie can confirm Candace Ow being one one of them that he was under a lot of pressure from the people that largely supported and funded his organization early on. Turning Point USA with a lot of Jewish donors and for a long time he was very favorable and defended Israel. And in more recent months, he was under a lot of pressure for just allowing the other side to come on his stage and debate. So, I've already spent way too much time kind of showing where my perspective is on this, right? Like, is it a possibility? Yeah, I think it is a possibility because of what we've seen and the fact that we know that that one government is like the world's leader in taking people out in a covert way or in a uh in a way that makes it look one way, but it's really not. So, let's talk about the Mouser K98. So, if you guys haven't seen my video yet that I published a few days ago, I encourage you to go check it out in the comment section where people just kept commenting about the rifle being able to be broken down and how it could be easily be stowed in his backpack and therefore uh concealed and then it wouldn't show up in these photos of him in the stairwell. So, this is these photos right here where I break down how there's no way he has a full-size mouser in his trouser. Literally, again, people are pointing me to this video here. And then he goes through and shows how one could break down the mouser and conceal it. But I have people pointing to this video saying, "Look, dude. They dude could have definitely broken it down and put it back together. Look, look, look at this video." Dude literally posted this in the comments in the last video. Well, the problem is with an old rifle like this, although all albeit the new rifle is or the rifle used was not quite an old wooden stock. It looked like a synthetic stock, but albeit an old mouser like this would most likely have been bedded into the stock. And what is bedding for those you don't know who those of you who aren't into firearms? Betting is essentially an epoxy like glue that allows the the stock to the receiver connection to be consistent and as tight as possible. Because if it's not and there's any wiggle room there when you shoot the gun and under recoil if that thing moves at all even ever so slightly a millimeter that is going to change the impact. Your point of impact is going to change every time you pull the trigger because there's play there in the stock to receiver connection. That lockup needs to be rock solid. So, a lot of old bull guns, especially that didn't have the machining tolerances that we have today, used some sort of bedding method to get it to be rock solid in an old wooden stock or an old an old fiber composite stock. So, but if we eliminate the possibility of it being a bedded rifle, cuz not all rifles are bedded, especially newer ones, but if we remove that theory, if if it wasn't bed, because if it was bedded, it's like hard to pull them apart a lot of the It's like it's like it's like super glued essentially. I went through that with a rifle of mine. I mean, I got it apart, but it like cracked like it felt like I broke something cuz I was breaking that epoxy part. But if it was epoxied and bedded, then when he takes it apart and he puts it back together, there's a very high likelihood if it's that old style, right, that it would not retain zero. Okay. Now, let's just say it was embedded for the sake of the argument of the folks in the internet. This guy does not actually show breaking the rifle down on camera. Now, does he do that maliciously? I don't I don't think he does it maliciously, but it would have been helpful because again, the official narrative is he broke it down, put it in his backpack, he got up there, and he assembled it. Now, I don't believe he shows assembly either, and maybe that's because of YouTube, but um there's a video from Big Tech's Ordinance Range that I'm not going to play for you guys, but he breaks it down. It's essentially not that many parts. It really isn't that difficult in a bench or in a in a gunsmithing room or at the range even. But in the case of I'm about to pull a shot and assassinate somebody in front of thousands of people, billions of people, including the internet, that is a lengthy task to perform. and especially a lengthy task if you think that he in that in that footage of him uh retreating or running away right here in this footage here. If you believe that he has it, he has broken it down after he took the shot, then we can't really agree on much there, cuz you're going to tell me this dude took the shot, sat up there, took, let's say, on a on a really like grandmaster level of disassembling a mouser. Took him a minute, 30 seconds to 2 minutes. That is a lot of time after you've assassinated somebody in front of thousands of people. So, and if you don't think so, I don't I just don't see him carrying anything in this video. So, I don't see him carrying a fully assembled mouser. That jacket is way too limp to have anything longer than in my opinion like a Mark1 18. Maybe something like this long. Maybe the stock would have been at least 22 in on its own. I think that's the gentleman measured I think it was like 22 inches on the barrel was 22 in. The stock was 18 to 20 in. I just don't believe he would have had time. I mean, yeah. Where are all the people fleeing from this event? That's another thing in this video that I didn't really point out before. Where is everyone running? They they just heard a shot. This guy's gone. He's gone with a wind. If he just pulled the shot, and if he disassembled the gun, then that's a 2 minutes later, you would certainly see people flooding out, going to their cars, running away from the gunshot out of fear of potentially being shot themselves. But you don't see that at all. So again, it just further illustrates the point that the FBI story of him packing the rifle in, assembling the rifle, disassembling the rifle, packing it out, and then reassembling the rifle to leave it neatly in this in the woods for the FBI to find. It is just so far-fetched. And I'll go back again to to give this dude credit. He does disassemble the gun and he tries concealing it and walking around with it. But also, this dude is is no Robinson. This dude is a much larger, thicker build. Uh he's wearing all black with a back with a black backdrop as well. I just want to point that out. Really bad. Like really favorable to the argument that you could conceal it without printing too much. Like you're wearing black with a black background and it's very dark. Like you can see the screen. I'm like my screen brightness is There you go. There's all the way up. Right now, you can see it's black on black. So, like right there, how much is that bulging? If that was a white background, you'd be able to see a lot clear more clearly. And also, this dude is pretty thick. So, it's nothing against him, but he's not the skinny dude wearing skinny jeans. Okay. And now he has the barreled action on one side, I believe. Maybe this is the stock over here. And then he has the the barreled action on the other side. But he has the the stock and the barrel action or the chassis, you could say. Not the stock. It's a full chassis. Um, I'll show you guys real quick. You know what? Let's just listen to him. >> Looked like he cut anything off in the front end. He also didn't have any slings mounted. Just under 30 in. And >> so I was wrong. That's 30 in. Okay. 30 in. Pretty large. >> Um there may be some variables in the gun that was used. Um there are different stock lengths out there. There's different lengths of pole, different 4end lengths. Uh the one he used looked like it was pretty much standard. It didn't look like he cut anything on the barrel and the receiver assembly. Uh the overall barrel length on this is uh looks like it's about a a 22 going from the chamber forward. And the overall length of this component is just about 31 12 312. >> So you have two items on either side of you if you are to believe this story that are both over 30 in long. You tell me even with that crazy theor you want to accept that crazy theory. Okay. You tell me if you see that here. You see two items that are 30 in long going down this dude's sides being able to bend his legs this way. This guy does demonstrate walking and all that. But look how much skinnier this dude is. He's wearing a backpack which is also going to pull against his shirt making it tighter and making it more likely you would see him printing on his sides. Okay. I just don't buy it. Is it possible? Yeah, anything's possible. I mean, it's possible. But why wouldn't FBI release the video? Get a much better idea of whether or not he was actually carrying that out. Now, let's just go ahead for the for the dudes who want to see this cuz it is interesting. He does show himself walking around here with uh both in his clothes here. Okay. And then later on, he does throw the backpack on. So, he's kind of describing what he's feeling and and it goes down to like right about his knee. You can see it there. So, is it possible? Yeah. Look how he's clenching his arms though to keep it from falling through. Could the dude have used some sort of strap to strap it to himself? Yeah. But AAM's razor, guys, you guys know what AA's razor is? Usually, the simplest explanation is the most likely. And I don't see this as the simplest explanation by any means. Some of you may be like, "Well, yo, you're the you're the guy who's making up baseless conspiracies and trying to, you know, make excuses or make uh come up with reasons for this to have happened when the simplest reason is what they're telling us." I I disagree. I think this is a pretty elaborate way to get around the fact that it's very clear he's not holding anything or packing anything in his clothing going up to the roof. And then the the screwdriver, why why did that come out later? That's always my question. Like, why did that, oh, it's an ongoing investigation. The FBI is like a release that what harm does it does it give to the public or to their investigation to say there's a screwdriver found on the roof. Also, the shooter leaves a screwdriver with his DNA on it on the roof. Weird. Cuz he didn't leave anything else. He didn't leave his change of clothes up there. He didn't leave the rifle up there. He didn't leave any casings up there. Why would he leave a screwdriver with his DNA on it up there? That's That's just really strange. How do you explain that? Oh, well, the screwdriver needed to be there because everyone's saying you can't see him carrying [ __ ] in that picture. So, we need to come up with a reason, a way that our story makes sense. So, here we go. Slipping a little screwdriver. Is that Is that true? I don't know. Maybe. Again, just asking questions, guys. Let's see here. He puts the backpack on here. I want to show you guys this real quick. backpack was. But if you can see, and I'll have to go look in the mirror cuz I'm not reviewing this, but I can move like this. Now, I don't know how the stairs, we do have him going upstairs. >> Stairs. Okay, move the stairs. >> I'm going to >> Okay, there you can see it with the white background how much more that's bulging out right there. >> See how it was? You could see he looks like Spongebob Squarepants here. >> Square sides. >> He's walking up the stairs. >> So, he's expressing he has his arms out. I didn't see that. Uh again, in the picture that I see, he does not have his arms out, but maybe at the bottom of the stairs, he had his arms out to begin with. Um it doesn't look like he's particularly like clenching himself in. I mean, it's kind of obvious when when you go like this to to squeeze your [ __ ] in. Um I don't know. Can it be explained away? >> That's a sure, but is it likely? I really don't think so. Here we go. >> It's not out of the realm of possibility that she can walk. >> Okay. >> After having chewed over >> I agree with him. It's not out of the realm of possibility, but is it likely? I would say extremely unlikely in my humble opinion. Now, uh, and that's not even to again go into the fact that the extra time it would have taken like and just going through the reasoning of somebody who is a 22-year-old radicalized leftist like they want you to believe. This dude would be [ __ ] his pants. He's not a professional. He's not going to sit there calmly and disassemble his mouser and put it back in his backpack to just then sprint off the side of the roof and jump from 12 ft up and and sprain his leg. Okay? Like, that's a person who's not thinking clearly. And for any of you those those of you who say it would fit in his backpack, that's another thing I keep forgetting to mention. There's is literally no way in hell that that mouser broken down or not, especially obviously not broken down is going to fit into this backpack. That does not look like a backpacking backpack or or any kind of like camping backpack. That is like a normal size backpack. Even this one right here, which is which is relatively, you know, oversized vertex bag. I can fit a lot of stuff in this bag right here. Even this guy would come nowhere close to fitting something that's 30 inches long, over 30 inches long. Even if it was a slightly larger than this backpack, there's uh there's no way I'm buying that it's in the backpack. So maybe it was in his pant leg and his shirt, but again, something just does not add up, guys. That's that's all I'm trying to say. Now, quickly, I'm going to touch on what I said in the last video, uh which was that it's not an easy shot to make, being that it's this guy with no bipod, no rear bag, and 142 yard shot. So, this is the distance of the shot here. I have it mapped out. 425.3 ft, which is approximately 142 yards. So, I mapped it out on Google Maps here. Um, originally, I think in the S2 video, he showed the shooter being on this platform here, but I think it's pretty clear that he's actually on this top platform because he sprints over here, and then you see him running behind this little square uh extrusion uh protrusion here in the in the roof. So you see him running behind this and it would have to be all on this one level. There is, if you look at street view from down here, there is a ladder right here to where you can get from possibly a man door out here up onto this ladder and up, but that is facing the event. So I doubt that was the way he got up, but who knows? Um, to be honest, I don't know enough about the building. I'm not there. But I say all this to say, I'm going to defend the point that I make made about it being a more difficult shot given the circumstances with this kid who I just don't believe has the skill set with this rifle. So, let's talk about why I said that because it's not a difficult shot for most average shooters. Now, am I qualified to talk about this? Yes. I shoot a lot of rounds. I've never been in the military. I'm not law enforcement, but I shoot with those guys all the time, whether it be against them in competitions or in training classes. And not beating my chest here, but it's just factual. 95% of the time I outshoot the military, law enforcement, and a few special operators that I've trained with. As far as pure accuracy, you're not talking about physical fitness, not talking about land navigation and all the other things that they, you know, medical that they know and they need to be trained well on and and strategic warfare and just straight up trigger pulls and impacts on targets and accuracy with time. I shoot better than most. So, I am qualified to talk about how hard it would be to take a shot at this range, right? Not saying I'm the best in the world. As far as again, the vast majority of excellent shooters, I'm very mediocre. But compared to most of the military law enforcement out there that I've trained with, and that's a lot here in Texas, I outshoot most of them. So, I'm more than qualified to talk about it doesn't take, you don't, and by the way, you don't need to be a special operator to know how to shoot. And this guy, this kid didn't need to be a special operator to know how to shoot either. But given the fact that he's shooting a a mouser uh in 30 odd six, this gun right here, um again, no no bipod. He's disassembling it and reassembling it, which again in in its own nature can cause your zero to shift. But what is what is the inherent accuracy of a Mouser K98? And if you ask the internet, the answer is about 4 to 6 in depending on the specific rifle and ammunition used. Obviously, ammunition has a huge effect on your accuracy. Anyone who shoots knows that. Hand loads versus factory ammo versus, you know, acurize versus FMJ, all that good [ __ ] But let's just say some well-maintained examples can achieve tighter uh tighter groups of about 2 in. So, this is a very favorable assumption. I talked to a friend of mine who is a collector of mousers and many different calibers he has them, but it doesn't change the fact that he said with a factory barrel that gun is shooting about 4 in on standard with a factory barrel. We're being very charitable to say 2 in, right? That's like the extreme spread, like the extreme low end of the spread of these guns and how accurate they are. So, let's say 2 in at 100 yards. What that is is 2 MOA. So, at 142 yards, that is just under 3 in. 3 MOA rather. So, that is a 2.85 MOA at 142 yards. Let's take our measuring tape here. There is 3 in right there. If you want to shoot this target right here, right? If you go from the edge of my neck to the other edge of my neck, that's approximately like five 5 and 12 in. At the extreme spread of the accuracy, assuming he had match grade ammunition, the most accurate mouser ever created, you're talking about the gun, if it never moved, if you cemented concreted that gun into place and pulled the trigger five times in that extreme scenario, it would be in a group about 2.85 in big. So that is removing all human error, all wiggle, all wobble, all breath work, all your trigger inputs into the shot out of the question. The gun is capable of a 2.85 inch group on the extreme low end. On the average, like my buddy said, the 4 in average, 4 in at 100 yards. My neck is only 5 in wide from edge to edge, skin to skin. Okay, that's a small T. That's that's a hard shot to hit. You have to be perfect on your trigger press. That's what I'm saying. Your sight picture has to be perfect. Your breath has to be perfect. your trigger pull to be perfect and you better hope you didn't get a hot round or or a underloaded round. It's got to be perfect. And at four 4 in at 100 yards is over 5 in at 142 yards. So take that for what it's worth. It's just something to know. But that may not even be an issue because we have new footage coming out. Again, unverified, but I think this is very interesting. I want to show you guys of another angle. A gentleman showing something that I hadn't seen yet. and he posted this I believe yesterday and uh he talks about the shooter being in a potentially different position. So let's take a look at this. Keep your eye on this space here where the red circle is as the next clip plays to me. I first seen this and thought straight away, holy [ __ ] that is the bullet. It matches the exit wound. It also matches the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit. Um, I needed another angle just to see if this was actually fact. I'm trying to get as much info as I could before I posted anything. And in that video, you can see the same what appears to be the bullet coming down. And it does line up with the actual gunshot itself. >> We're not coming by. >> So, again, I needed another angle. I found this video and this one's a little bit harder to see, but you can see something. Go down into the back right hand side of uh of Charlie. So, from this looking at Google Earth and and drawing a line from where I believe the shooter was, um, his tent being set up in the middle of that triangle area would appear that the shooter was up here somewhere. Um, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from. Um, it all makes sense to me. pretty crazy. I think if we pan around and look at where the media and where everyone else is saying that the bullet come from and giving scenarios on ricochets and different bullets and bits and pieces, it just it doesn't make sense for it to come from this from the rooftop over here. It's um it well it doesn't line up with what appears to be the bullet anyway. Um, however, when we come and look from this point of view, I'll just swing this around so we can get a uh a better idea um of what's around here. You can see there's rooftop access there, but there's also um a staircase down in in the little alley there in that little nook. So, um, >> okay. So, first things first, no idea if this is true. This is not verified, but as a guy who shoots all the time and films myself shooting all the time, I will say light does weird things. And even when shooting really fast rounds, I can catch the rounds on the camera sometimes shooting at 60 frames per second. Everyone's saying, "Well, you the iPhone films at 30 frames per second." Yeah, sometimes. But a lot of iPhones shoot at 4K at 60 frames per second now. Uh, but that's not a huge difference, right? That's not a high-speed camera, and that's not slow-mo on the iPhone either. But light is the fastest thing in the universe. So, it doesn't take a lot for a photon to bounce off an object and catch the camera at the right moment for a moment in time or for the camera to catch atmospherics like um like the sound barrier being broken, catching that sonic boom, catching that boom coming off and and seeing what the what it does to the pressure and the air waves around it. That that to me is what that looks like more in that zoomed out shot. Um, unfortunately I don't think there's a way for me to like rewind on Instagram on the desktop, so I can't like go back for you. But that's my perspective on it. Is it possible? 100%. I see it all the time. I see bullets flying out of 65 Creedors that are traveling ridiculously fast. I catch those the little glints in the sun depending on the angle, the time of day, the the direction of the sun. Does it happen all the time? Like in every video? No. But there's definitely certain times where I'm editing and I'll do a little bit of back and forth. Oh, that's pretty cool. There's a bullet right there. Also, there's a thing called a vapor trail, which is what it looks like in the last scene. Um, this looks like a like a glint of sun just hitting it and the one in a million chance that God maybe gave us to see something flying there. It all checks out. Like, let's let's start with that. There was an autopsy. There was an autopsy, but the the results haven't been released. Okay, if you buy the original narrative, that was the entry wound right there in the front, but it looked more like an exit wound. I didn't really get into it cuz to me like this this never even occurred to me at the time. Like I was too involved with looking into the the uh the inconsistencies in like the rifle and the dude changing his clothes. I was all wrapped up in that. I wasn't even wrapped up in the thing I know best, which is gunshots. Um in that case, it looks like a little glint of sunlight hit that bullet at the perfect time and the phone captured it. Is that possible? Just like everyone's saying, is it possible that he packed it in in his pants? Yeah, it's definitely possible. I've seen it. Now, in this picture here, this part of the video rather, I have it muted now. Uh, this looks more like a this looks more like a um an atmospheric type occurrence, whether it be the sound barrier breaking, um, vapor trail, something like that, that kind of c again caught the sun, right? Um, is it possible? 100%. And based off of the trajectory and and the way that his body reacted and the supposed exit wound being down here and the supposed entry wound being back here from this angle 100% looks like it could have been possible. This right here looks like a vapor trail. That's what that looks like to me. Really grainy shitty footage of a vapor trail and in this angle coming it would be coming in like right over this camera's essentially over their left shoulder into Charlie's back right shoulder area neck and coming right out the front. This is a way bullets tend to travel in straight paths. I know they can do weird things, but a 30 odd 6, which we haven't even confirmed yet if it's actually a 306 that hit him. We have no actual forensic data on the bullet, but if it was a 30 odd 6 traveling out of a 22 in or 24 in barrel, that thing is cooking. And it's very unlikely that this much flesh is going to divert the direction of it that much. Even even with the spine being there, I just don't see it happening. And after seeing this, I was like, man, that is very clearly more of an exit wound than an entry wound. Most of the entry on wounds you see on any animal that you ever hunted um or humans even if it's not a shotgun with with double eye buckshot at point blank range is a very small hole about the size of a pencil usually size maybe a little bit larger than the diameter of the bullet. Um, but it's the exit wound that is much more um catastrophic and depending on how fast the rounds traveling, how much time it's had to expand in the tissue. Um, you could say that that wound looked more like an entry wound because it was such a short amount of flesh it traveled through. It didn't probably had that much time to expand, but that makes a lot more sense that he got shot from back here and that was a smaller yet pretty uh catastrophic as we saw exit wound. Uh, but we haven't seen the we haven't seen the autopsy so we won't know until that comes out. So, that was another angle I wanted to show you guys. Um, it is certainly possible for you to catch bullets flying on on camera, even a non- highspeed camera. I film on this camera that we're that you're seeing me on at 60 frames per second. So, I've done it before. Obviously, 300 Blackout subsonic, you can see that [ __ ] all day. You see every single bullet flying, but even the super stuff you can see as well, uh, if the camera just catches it, right? And there's a lot of other things like atmospherics. again. Could it be a bug? Could that have been just a bug? Like, or like could that have been a bee that the sun hit, right? Yeah. But it's very precarious that it's right. It's right there. And you can kind of see it moving. You see the light. You see it like kind of appear. It almost appears as if it there's a sunrise on it or sunset. It appears in a line. You see it appear in a line and then literally as it disappears, Charlie is struck. So, I do believe this is probably the more likely uh direction of the shot, especially considering um considering that the ex the entry wound would not line up with the direction of the fire from uh from the original or the narrative position of the shooter. It does not line up this left side of his neck right here. And people are saying it hit his plate. Um I don't think so. I think the way he reacted from getting struck here is a completely reasonable way to react. Somebody of his size sitting in that position if you were to get shot that way. It would definitely jolt you forward. And it's very easy to see how that would happen. It didn't need to be, you know, it didn't need to be him getting blown to the front, right? That bullet's going so fast it whizzed right through him. It didn't push him very much. It caused his body to tense up and then he, you know, he went back and was I mean, [ __ ] terrible. I feel horrible even just doing that motion. It feels very wrong. Okay. Um, an absolute tragedy that I pray to God, and this is another thing I wanted to bring up. I don't find joy in not believing the narrative. I don't find joy in thinking that our government andor foreign governments are acting on American soil, assassinating people for having conversations and discussing things like this. I'm one of these people. My nowhere near as big as Charlie Kirk, nowhere near as influential, but I'm one of these people, too. Like I want to be able to have these conversations and I'm doing it here on the channel. But am I nervous about it? Yeah, a little bit. I mean, I don't I don't want my car to blow up one day when I go turn it on. I don't want my computer to explode in front of me or when I'm near my daughter because I said something critical of Israel or the CIA or whoever. So, I would love to believe it was just some deranged 22-year-old because that's a lot easier to confront. Not I mean, it's not great like it was a sucker punch. How could you prevented that really besides being in a Pope mobile? But it's a it's a person. It's not an entity. It's not everything we've ever believed in being wrong and coming after us if we question their authority and their power. We have a threat to their authority and their power. That's far more large of an issue to address and tackle. I would much rather it be the narrative story. But again, what do people have to gain from blaming it on a 22-year-old radicalized dude who went went off to college, got radicalized, is dating a transgender person? Well, what do you have to gain? Maybe maybe getting the America into a war to fight that to imprison people who descent or disagree with you to bring more federal power on board to allow Planter to come on board all levels of the government start to surveil us more and more and to lose more rights to the federal government, the NSA, the CIA, ATF. All right. Um, so we went through all that. And guys, just one last thing I want to point out. Now, this isn't obviously the same weapon that was used. The weapon that was used was um more of like a spoilerized modernized I guess you could say. We already talked about the scope being mounted way too far back. A lot of people are saying it needs to be mounted that far back because the safety on these guys is right here and in order to disassemble it that needs to come all the way up, but from what I'm seeing it would still impact the bell of that optic. They're saying it needs to be that far back so you could lift that up and operate the rifle properly. You're clearly an idiot. And I'm like, okay, I don't own a mouser, so you're right. I don't know. But either way, that's pretty dumb. If you Why wouldn't you just pick a smaller optic or a different optic uh or extend your stock? It's very a suboptimal system. Let's put it that way. That is pretty much going to be it, guys. There is clear motive to me for individuals that did not like what Charlie Kirk was saying, who was dissenting. He was allowing other people the other side of the of the aisle to come on like Dave Smith and Tucker Carlson who are very much pro-American and pro-American interests and not being the uh bank for Israel and not letting them drag us into more never-ending wars. That's pretty much going to be it, guys. Again, I'm not suicidal. I love every single one of you guys. If you guys want to support the channel, head over to rangebro.com. We have all of our merch over there. We have our GTF tyrants and a bunch of other t-shirts over there as well as all of our affiliate links and discount codes as well. Um, shout out to every single one of you for staying to the end of the video. It means a lot. I'm hopeful for the future. All we can do is pray and thank God for the days that we have and try to have these conversations. And don't be scared of having these conversations. That's what Charlie Kirk wanted. He wanted you to talk about it with people. Don't be afraid to have these conversations. And um again, was never a big watcher of Charlie before this cuz I was just busy and I didn't really consume that kind of content. But I got to say this whole situation inspired me to to ask those questions, have those conversations, and instead of just like, man, I don't want to really get into it. I don't I don't It's not really worth the trouble that I might endure by talking about it. No, it's like we we owe it to him to talk about it now. So, love you guys. Christ is king. Drink a lot of water. Stay safe. Stay dangerous.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.