Charlie Kirk and Senator Mike Lee Discuss Left-Wing Terrorism Targeting Elon Musk and Tesla

[00:00] with the stock market at record highs

[00:01] are you prepared for the next downturn

[00:04] Corrections can be unforgiving smart

[00:06] investors know diversification is the

[00:08] key to Financial Security Noble gold

[00:11] Investments make it easy to diversify

[00:13] with gold with over $2 billion in sales

[00:16] Noble gold has helped thousands of

[00:18] Americans add gold to their portfolios

[00:21] open a qualified account today and

[00:23] received two 5 oun silver America the

[00:25] Beautiful coins as a thank you noblegold

[00:28] investments.com don't let the next

[00:30] correction catch you off guard Noble

[00:33] gold investments.com

[00:36] joining us now is Senator Mike Lee from

[00:39] the great state of Utah senator thank

[00:40] you so much for taking the

[00:42] time thank you for having me Senator

[00:46] what do you make of this rise of

[00:48] left-wing terrorism targeted at Tesla

[00:51] and Elon Musk my fear Senator and I hope

[00:54] I'm wrong and let's say stay in prayer

[00:56] that I'm wrong that someone is going to

[00:58] get shot the same way that Steve scales

[00:59] got shot and God forbid killed the left

[01:02] is creating a pressure cooker with so

[01:05] many of their Rank and fireal

[01:06] paramilitary troops that very well might

[01:09] result in one of us getting shot or

[01:12] killed God forbid that happens we're

[01:14] getting death threats every single day

[01:16] here on the Charlie Kirk show Senator

[01:18] Mike Lee your

[01:20] thoughts this is what domestic terrorism

[01:24] does this is what domestic terrorism

[01:26] looks like they very much want people to

[01:29] be in fear that's why they do it they

[01:32] understand that people understand that

[01:34] there's a risk of bodily harm or even

[01:36] death in these kinds of circumstances

[01:39] and that's designed to induce fear one

[01:41] of the many problems with this is that

[01:43] these folks apparently feel at Liberty

[01:45] to do this they've been trained by the

[01:47] radical left to think that there will be

[01:49] no consequence to them for doing this

[01:51] that they'll be applauded that they'll

[01:53] be rewarded this isn't going to end well

[01:55] for them uh and it's not going to end

[01:57] well for the country it's got to come to

[01:58] a stop one of the things that is missing

[02:01] in all of this we haven't seen

[02:04] politicians on the left elected office

[02:06] holders in the Democratic party in any

[02:08] significant numbers coming out and

[02:10] saying stop this madness end this stop

[02:12] the death threats stop the painting of

[02:15] the sasas the vandalism uh all forms of

[02:18] violence um knock it off you've seen

[02:21] that almost not at all representative

[02:23] Rana was one of the few who has come out

[02:25] to do it and I I invite uh all other

[02:28] Democrats to join him there's no good

[02:30] reason for them not to and they must we

[02:33] have a piece of tape here I believe in

[02:35] our library I'm trying to find it Jimmy

[02:37] Kimmel who's supposed to be a funny man

[02:40] he he he read on a script you know stop

[02:43] burning Teslas but obviously did it as a

[02:45] joke and did it as a way to try to of

[02:47] course encourage his audience to burn

[02:49] more Teslas as he did it with a little

[02:50] bit of a smirk trying to find the piece

[02:52] of tape here we have so much tape it's

[02:55] 195 thank you Ryan let's play Cut 195

[02:58] please and he fired them immediately

[03:00] upon Landing Tesla stock is way down

[03:03] almost disastrously so

[03:07] people people have

[03:09] been vandalizing Tesla vehicles new

[03:12] Tesla vehicles please don't vandalize

[03:15] don't ever vandalize Tesla vehicles and

[03:18] so

[03:20] uh Elon Musk has been making the rounds

[03:23] in the right-wing

[03:24] media Senator your

[03:27] reaction this isn't funny

[03:30] it's not cute it shouldn't be allowed on

[03:34] public Airwaves and I'm frankly stunned

[03:37] that his Network hasn't called him out

[03:38] on it hasn't

[03:40] apologized uh hasn't taken some action

[03:43] against them for doing this this is

[03:45] disgraceful look regardless of what your

[03:47] political views are as an American you

[03:50] should be able to look at this

[03:51] objectively and say uh you know um

[03:55] violence and acts of vandalism aren't a

[03:57] good thing and if you're going to

[03:59] comment on that either say something

[04:01] that's actually funny which this wasn't

[04:04] or ideally parrot was something

[04:07] suggesting that people not do it instead

[04:09] he did the opposite that is

[04:11] shameful and and yet Disney is not going

[04:13] to have a single Advertiser drop not a

[04:16] single Advertiser say you know I don't

[04:18] know that might go a little bit too far

[04:20] let's continue here this is uh Tim Waltz

[04:24] a sitting governor of a state cheering

[04:26] on the downfall of a American

[04:30] manufacturing public company Tim wals is

[04:34] cheering for people to lose their jobs

[04:36] these people are arsonists and Tim Walls

[04:38] knows something about arson because his

[04:40] creepy wife enjoyed the smell of arson

[04:44] during Floyd of paloa real thing play

[04:47] Cut

[04:49] 196 saying on my phone I don't know some

[04:51] of you know this on the iPhone they've

[04:52] got that little Stock app I added Tesla

[04:54] to it to give me a little boost during

[04:56] the

[04:57] day 22 five and dropping

[05:04] so

[05:05] and and if you own one if you own one

[05:09] we're not blaming you you can you can

[05:11] take dental floss and pull the Tesla

[05:13] thing off you know and take out just

[05:15] telling

[05:16] you Senator the the approach from the

[05:20] left seems to be allout maximalist

[05:24] cultural terrorism

[05:27] intimidation are any of your colleagues

[05:29] on the Senate I mean you guys have good

[05:31] relationships with Dems what what are

[05:33] they saying when you confront them in

[05:35] the hall like hey can you speak out

[05:36] against

[05:38] this like they haven't been inclined to

[05:42] talk about it and um then when

[05:45] Democratic politicians do talk about it

[05:47] they at least don't denounce it take

[05:49] this comment from Tim Walls for example

[05:52] um there's nothing wrong if you know if

[05:55] if that's his thing to monitor the

[05:58] stocks of or F or that company and

[06:02] figure out what kind of stock prices

[06:05] make him happy and make him sad and if

[06:07] he wants to celebrate when some company

[06:09] stock value goes down it's up to him

[06:11] it's weird here even that his own State

[06:14] retirement fund is pretty heavily

[06:16] invested in Tesla as I understand it so

[06:19] he's

[06:20] celebrating the diminution in value of

[06:24] his own state workers his own State

[06:26] retirees uh retirement benefits and of

[06:29] weird but what's doubly weird and

[06:32] concerning is that if he's if he's going

[06:34] to bring up Tesla at all why wouldn't he

[06:37] take that opportunity to say by the way

[06:40] regardless of whether you want to

[06:41] celebrate when Tesla's stock price goes

[06:43] down knock it off with the violence he

[06:45] didn't do that there's a reason he

[06:47] didn't do that and I I fear what it

[06:50] means for the future of our country and

[06:52] democrats should fear what that means

[06:54] for the future of the democratic

[06:56] party so let's uh I now want your

[06:58] thoughts here Senor on the Nationwide

[07:00] injunction crisis is there anything

[07:03] Congress will do to slow down this

[07:05] disturbing

[07:07] Trend look there are things that can be

[07:11] done I'll be introducing legislation

[07:13] next week that would require a a

[07:16] separate procedure to be followed for

[07:18] this type of injunction when I mean this

[07:19] type of injunction I mean a type of

[07:21] injunction that has Nationwide

[07:23] applicability within the US government

[07:26] uh and is focused on a you know a

[07:28] presidential poliy policy decision uh

[07:31] those should have to go rather than

[07:34] being considered by a single federal

[07:36] district judge they should have to uh go

[07:39] before a three-judge district court

[07:42] panel this is a procedure that's

[07:44] utilized in some limited cases most of

[07:47] them dealing with the apportionment of

[07:50] seats in the House of Representatives or

[07:51] the drawing of federal legislative

[07:53] boundaries uh but we could add this to

[07:55] the list and that's what my legislation

[07:57] would do make it infinitely more

[08:00] difficult to gain the system to judge

[08:02] shop uh to file the case in a place that

[08:06] suggests from the outset you'll get a

[08:08] very favorable audience from a leftist

[08:10] judge and then just as importantly

[08:13] anytime you've got a three-judge

[08:14] district court panel you've got an

[08:17] immediate automatic appeal to the US

[08:20] Supreme Court not the opportunity to

[08:21] seek sir Shari or discretionary review

[08:24] from the Supreme Court which is how it

[08:26] usually works there but rather a direct

[08:29] appeal meaning the Supreme Court has to

[08:31] review it or if it chooses not to it's

[08:34] still setting precedent this would

[08:36] expedite the process diminish the amount

[08:38] of time uh that these leftist activist

[08:42] judges uh could highe up the Trump

[08:46] Administration uh in these uh legal

[08:49] proceedings and it would also

[08:51] dramatically impair the ability of the

[08:54] plaintiffs uh to judge Shel so as to rig

[08:57] the system in their favor

[08:59] so I in closing here Senator it seems as

[09:02] if that this new pattern of Nationwide

[09:06] injunctions is the norm not the

[09:08] exception the Supreme

[09:11] Court has to meet and they have to try

[09:13] to reconcile this for the good of the

[09:16] country and the Republic I suppose the

[09:20] question I have here is as someone

[09:23] yourself who really cares about the law

[09:25] and the application of it at what point

[09:28] do you think it's ever appropriate for

[09:30] president Trump to ignore a district

[09:33] court decision if it involved foreign

[09:37] policy is there ever a threshold where

[09:38] that must happen if the injunctions

[09:41] continue out of

[09:44] control yeah this is maybe roughly

[09:46] analogous to the fact that there are

[09:49] circumstances in which a direct order

[09:51] from someone in your chain of command at

[09:52] the military isn't something that you

[09:54] follow um I don't know that the parallel

[09:57] works exactly but yeah I mean they theor

[09:59] iCal limits Beyond which a chief

[10:02] executive um might deem it appropriate

[10:05] not to follow something um uh it's got

[10:08] to be a matter of of individual

[10:09] discretion in the circumstance that we

[10:11] saw last week uh the thing that the

[10:14] court was trying to stop had already

[10:16] happened that was already underway so

[10:19] that's it's a different set of

[10:20] circumstances than what you were

[10:22] describing um the rule of law is

[10:26] important and so normally one uh follows

[10:29] orders it would be the extreme extreme

[10:33] unusual exception U or something like

[10:36] that to exist but I don't think anyone

[10:38] doubts that there are limits to that

[10:41] Senator uh thank you so much for your

[10:42] leadership I hope we can re in this

[10:45] black robe tyranny that we are living

[10:47] under thanks so

[10:49] much hey thank you