Up Next

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Tik Tok and Young Voters Fueled Trump's Historic Comeback Victory

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Tik Tok and Young Voters Fueled Trump's Historic Comeback Victory

20:36

Donald Trump Jr. on the Most Amazing Political Comeback in American History and Why Exile Made Them Stronger

Donald Trump Jr. on the Most Amazing Political Comeback in American History and Why Exile Made Them Stronger

22:56

Charlie Kirk Declares Conservative Movement's Greatest Victory After Donald Trump's Historic Comeback at America Fest

Charlie Kirk Declares Conservative Movement's Greatest Victory After Donald Trump's Historic Comeback at America Fest

27:16

Charlie Kirk Breaks Down Trump's Constitutional Strategy to Shrink Government and Expose Federal Waste

Categories: Interviews
December 28, 2024

Charlie Kirk reveals the constitutional questions at the heart of President Trump's plan to dramatically cut government spending through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaking about the recent Congressional spending battle, Kirk explains how Trump intends to challenge whether the executive branch must spend all money appropriated by Congress, potentially saving hundreds of billions of dollars. Kirk discusses the strategic dismantling of agencies like the Department of Education, the presidential reorganization act, and why Elon Musk's purchase of X proved instrumental in mobilizing Americans against wasteful omnibus spending bills. The conversation explores the fundamental tension between congressional power and executive authority that could reshape American governance.

Breaking the Omnibus Spending Trap

Charlie Kirk identifies one of Washington DC's oldest tricks: bundling essential legislation with wasteful spending in massive omnibus bills. This forces congressmen in competitive districts to vote for packages containing items they oppose, simply because the bills also include necessary provisions like veteran funding. Kirk argues that breaking legislation into separate bills would allow each item to be judged on its own merits.

The resistance to separate votes comes down to a simple reality: members of Congress want to go home for Christmas vacation. Kirk points out that nurses, EMTs, and countless other Americans work on-call through Christmas Eve, Christmas, and New Year's, making far less money while keeping the country running. He questions why members of Congress cannot work through the holidays to conduct 12 or 15 separate votes, arguing that stewardship of the country is far more important than personal vacation plans.

Trump's Clean Slate Strategy

President Trump wants to enter office with a clean slate, not inheriting the problems of a dysfunctional Congress. Kirk explains that Trump's agenda, which Americans voted for, would be thwarted if he had to spend his first months cleaning up congressional messes. Additionally, Trump doesn't want Senate Majority Leader Schumer to have leverage over him with debt ceiling negotiations.

Kirk expresses his own position on the recent spending battle: while he opposes raising the debt limit in principle, he would have supported it this time to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt. Trump has earned that trust, and Kirk finds it credible that Trump isn't a debt guy. With Elon Musk leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the plan involves both growing the economy and cutting spending. If Trump doesn't dramatically shrink the size of government, Kirk argues, he doesn't stand a chance at success.

The Constitutional Question: Must the Executive Spend All Appropriated Funds?

Starting January 20, the executive branch through DOGE will pose a fundamental constitutional question that will likely reach the Supreme Court quickly: Does the executive branch have to spend all the money that Congress appropriates? This centers on the impoundment act and represents a fascinating constitutional question.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress controls the purse and that all spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives. However, it's unclear whether the executive branch must spend all appropriated money if they can fulfill their congressionally assigned duties for less. If DOGE determines they can accomplish something for half the cost, why can't they return the money to Congress or simply not spend it?

This constitutional tension between executive and legislative branches could result in hundreds of billions of dollars in cost savings. Senator Rand Paul and Russ Vought from the Office of Management and Budget have discussed this concept. Kirk praises Vought as "10 out of 10" and "spectacular."

Legislative Supremacy vs. Co-Equal Branches

The Founders never intended legislative supremacy. They designed a system of co-equal branches with spirited tension between them. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay, who designed and explained the U.S. Constitution, wanted collision between branches—not war, but different opinions on how governing should work.

Currently, America operates under the assumption that Congress can bully the executive branch regarding spending, forcing agencies to spend every dollar appropriated. Kirk describes the horror of cabinet officials and agency secretaries who must find things to spend money on because their funding will run out. If they don't spend it, they lose it in the next budget cycle. There's no reward for saving money, and agencies cannot simply return unused funds.

Kirk poses a simple question: What if every agency tried to operate at 70% or 50% of their current cost? With a $6 trillion federal budget, returning to pre-COVID 2019 spending levels would create a $500 billion surplus. Shrinking government will happen differently this time because it won't require immediate Congressional buy-in—the executive branch has a co-equal role in identifying and potentially saving money that Congress was forcing them to spend.

The Presidential Reorganization Act

Kirk advocates for reauthorizing the presidential reorganization act, which has been authorized multiple times in history. This act essentially states that if an agency can do work that duplicates another agency's function, it no longer needs to exist.

The Department of Education serves as a prime example. Kirk states unequivocally that the Department of Education needs to be shut down. Linda McMahon, whom Kirk describes as a "phenomenal" manager, shares President Trump's stated plan to close the Department of Education. However, Kirk acknowledges the practical steps required to dismantle it.

Dismantling the Department of Education

Kirk outlines three examples of how to break apart the Department of Education:

  • Student Loans: These should move to the Department of Treasury. While Kirk believes subsidized student loans should be eliminated entirely, moving this function to Treasury would at least reduce the Department of Education's role.
  • School Assisted Lunch: Whether or not taxpayers should fund school lunches is debatable, but if this program continues, it should fall under the Department of Agriculture, which already handles food stamps and similar programs.
  • Office of Civil Rights: The Department of Education has its own Senate-confirmed civil rights division that harasses Christian schools and targets conservative students. This function should move to the Department of Justice, which already has a civil rights division.

By relocating just these three functions, the Department of Education inherently weakens. Kirk notes that the Department of Education never existed in its current form originally—it used to be part of HEW (Health, Education, and Welfare). These departments could be re-merged to find duplicative processes and better synergies.

Constitutional Questions About Federal Education

Kirk goes further, stating he doesn't believe the Department of Education is constitutional at all. He argues it's not part of the original intent as written and that the federal government has no role in educating children, period.

Progressives understand something that many Democratic voters don't: the issue isn't about forcing everyone to live the same way. Kirk explains he has no problem with California living according to California values, no matter how "insane" he finds them. Communities can vote for their own policies. The problem arises when those policies are forced upon small towns that fundamentally disagree—and when everyone is forced to pay for them through federal mandates.

This is the problem with federalizing education: San Francisco values get imposed on small towns through federal power. The Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights exemplifies this overreach. Kirk recalls when the Department of Education used school lunch funding as leverage to force transgender bathroom policies. Schools were told they wouldn't receive money to feed children who needed lunch assistance unless they adopted radical transgender policies.

Linda McMahon's Dual Mission

Kirk believes Linda McMahon will pursue two concurrent goals: shutting down the Department of Education while also fixing and reversing as much damage as possible in the interim. This includes:

  • Ending Critical Race Theory in schools
  • Refusing to send federal money to schools teaching DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion)
  • Pushing the NCAA to ban men from competing in female sports, with the federal government refusing to send taxpayer dollars to the NCAA if they continue allowing this

These interim measures can help reverse the damage while working toward the ultimate goal of closing the department entirely.

The Supreme Court and the Administrative State

The fundamental constitutional question coming before the Supreme Court is this: Do federal workers in the administration work for the president, or does the president work for them? Kirk believes that thanks to President Trump's first-term Supreme Court appointments, the Court is finally willing to address these questions.

The West Virginia v. EPA case and other recent constitutional cases have begun questioning whether the administrative state itself is legitimate. The core issue: Can regulations be authored without Congress? Kirk argues that the entire premise of a fourth branch of government—unelected, unknown, and unchecked—contradicts America's founding principles.

The Power of Transparency Through DOGE

Kirk emphasizes that even if DOGE does nothing else besides live-tweeting government waste in real time, it will have performed a great service to the country. The exposure of waste should not be underestimated.

The recent Congressional spending battle demonstrated the power of the Trump-DOGE-X machine. When President Trump and Elon Musk mobilized opposition to the omnibus spending bill, the American people stood up and stopped it. This happened without going through mainstream media at all—it all occurred on X.

Kirk notes that media networks now simply report what they read on X, essentially just reading tweets on air as "breaking news." Americans don't need mainstream media as intermediaries anymore. This represents a decentralization and democratization (with a small 'd') of information flow.

Elon Musk's Historic Impact

When discussing Time Magazine's Person of the Year, Kirk agrees that Donald Trump was the obvious choice—the man who will change the world and potentially be remembered alongside Abraham Lincoln as a transformational figure, an anti-FDR and anti-Wilson. However, Kirk acknowledges that the only other legitimate choice would have been Elon Musk.

Musk did more to save America just by buying X than almost anything else. Kirk stands by his statement from when the purchase happened: Elon Musk's acquisition of X (formerly Twitter) was the most important transaction since the Louisiana Purchase in terms of scale and importance. Kirk believes it was the cause set in motion that helped save Western civilization.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:00] Charlie Kirk is with us Charlie you

[00:01] think Glenn great to see you it's

[00:03] phenomenal first of all it breaks things

[00:04] into separate votes that's the first ask

[00:06] enough of these omnibuses of it is the

[00:09] oldest trick in Washington DC put things

[00:11] that are essential with things that are

[00:12] terrible and then you bind these

[00:14] congressmen that are in tough districts

[00:15] they say oh I vote for this thing

[00:16] because had all this veteran stuff that

[00:18] I like and 90% of it was garbage yes and

[00:20] so if you break it into separate bills

[00:22] then you can actually say Okay farmer

[00:24] Aid disaster Aid fine do that separately

[00:26] you know why they don't like do doing

[00:28] that they actually wanted to go home

[00:29] this weekend for Christmas break it is

[00:30] as simple as that is that there is a

[00:32] lifestyle component to our legislative

[00:35] process and when I first learned that I

[00:37] said wait a second we have nurses EMTs

[00:40] we have people on 24 call that are

[00:41] working Christmas Eve and Christmas all

[00:42] through New Year's that are making the

[00:44] country run our members of Congress can

[00:46] work through Christmas yeah to go do 12

[00:48] or 15 separate votes it's not that hard

[00:50] in fact the stewardship of the country

[00:52] is far more important than your

[00:54] Christmas vacation yes and you know we

[00:58] they're working for

[01:00] the people allegedly allegedly that's

[01:03] what they're supposed to be doing I I

[01:06] gave up a day of my vacation to be here

[01:08] I'm I I'm on you're with all these

[01:10] wonderful Patriots look at all these

[01:11] great people and it's because everybody

[01:14] here is most likely doing the same thing

[01:17] giving you know taking some vacation

[01:18] time to be here because it's important

[01:20] it's really important yeah and it it's

[01:22] just a phenomenal event here and glory

[01:24] be to God and we we always have hang on

[01:26] just a second glory be to God yes but

[01:29] God God needs uh actual physical hands

[01:32] on Earth and you have been th this is

[01:36] your thing turning point is you it's our

[01:38] thing as an organization BL uh it took a

[01:42] leader to lead it and you deserve a lot

[01:46] of credit for the win uh and all the CR

[01:48] well no not all the credit but most of

[01:50] the credit for this because it was your

[01:52] baby uh thank you Glenn that that's very

[01:55] touching and I you know this and I'll

[01:56] throw it back at you you've been an

[01:58] instrumental piece in my World viiew

[02:01] formation okay uh so he won't accept it

[02:04] I I got to get better at receiving

[02:06] compliments no I and I I've heard you

[02:09] and it's really great and I and I'm

[02:11] grateful that you know we have a good

[02:13] relationship and and we've helped each

[02:15] other out um but uh let's uh let's talk

[02:19] about what we're facing January 20th MH

[02:23] um because we I I am for the spending

[02:28] cuts I am against raising the debt limit

[02:30] but if I were in Congress I would have

[02:33] done it this time because I want to give

[02:36] Donald Trump the benefit of the doubt I

[02:37] think he deserves it he's earned it uh

[02:40] and I find it credible he's not a debt

[02:43] guy but Elon Musk is uh and and Trump

[02:47] knows along with Elon Musk we got to

[02:49] grow the economy but we also have to cut

[02:52] it down and I'll give Donald Trump the

[02:54] uh the benefit of the doubt because if

[02:57] he doesn't cut the size of government

[02:59] dramatically

[03:00] he doesn't stand a chance he must shrink

[03:03] the size of the state a couple things

[03:05] number one on this legislative back and

[03:07] forth is that President Trump wants a

[03:09] clean slate what does that mean he does

[03:11] not want to inherit all of the problems

[03:13] of this dysfunctional Congress and he

[03:14] has to go clean this up and his agenda

[03:16] that he ran on that people voted for

[03:18] would be thwarted so he wants a clean

[03:20] slate he also doesn't want Schumer to

[03:22] have this him over a barrel with debt

[03:25] ceiling unnecessarily what president

[03:27] Trump has done this is what will happen

[03:29] January 20 through doge is that the

[03:31] executive branch is going to ask a

[03:33] fundamental constitutional question and

[03:35] it's going to go up to the Supreme Court

[03:36] very quickly which is does the executive

[03:38] branch have to spend all the money that

[03:39] Congress sends it this is around the

[03:41] idea of the empowerment act and it's a

[03:43] very interesting constitutional question

[03:45] it says in of course that the Congress

[03:47] controls the purse the House of

[03:48] Representatives all spending bills must

[03:49] originate in the house but it's not

[03:51] clear whether the executive branch has

[03:52] to spend all of that money if they can

[03:54] do the duties that Congress ascribes to

[03:56] them for less money so if doge is able

[03:58] to say hey we're able to do this for

[04:00] half the cost why can't they just send a

[04:02] wire back to Congress or say no we

[04:04] actually don't need it and that

[04:06] constitutional executive tension

[04:08] theoretically could result in hundreds

[04:11] of billions of dollars of cost savings

[04:13] and that is Senator on Russ vot has

[04:14] talked about this from Office of

[04:15] Management budget who's 10 out of 10

[04:16] he's spectacular is the empowerment act

[04:19] and then also the presidential re

[04:20] reorganization act I think I think

[04:22] that's a really healthy debate because

[04:23] our Founders did never they never wanted

[04:26] legislative Supremacy you know this they

[04:28] wanted co-equal branches and we're

[04:30] living under this idea that Congress can

[04:32] just bully the executive branch of what

[04:33] to do with spending you must spend it in

[04:35] fact Glenn you've covered the horror

[04:37] stories of cabinet officials and agency

[04:39] secretaries that have to spend the money

[04:41] like right now what's happening is

[04:42] they're finding things to spend money on

[04:44] because their money is going to run out

[04:46] and if you don't spend it then you you

[04:48] lose it the next time there's no reward

[04:50] for saving it and they'll say well even

[04:51] if we don't spend it it has to be sent

[04:53] to another con agency no that's not

[04:55] correct what if every agency says you

[04:57] know try to do this for 70% of the cost

[04:59] or half of the cost and you're talking

[05:01] about a $6 trillion Beast the ask is

[05:04] very simple can we go back to pre-co

[05:06] spending can we go back to 2019 spending

[05:08] we do that we have a $500 billion

[05:10] Surplus just back to pre-co spending

[05:12] levels and so the way that we shrink the

[05:15] size of government and the state is

[05:17] going to be done in a different way

[05:18] because typically it's like well you

[05:19] must immediately get Congressional Buy

[05:21] in the executive branch has a co-equal

[05:23] role in identifying and potentially even

[05:26] saving money that Congress was forcing

[05:28] them once time and you know the

[05:29] Democrats are taking everything to court

[05:32] how long before Donald Trump just starts

[05:34] to shut parts of the government down I I

[05:38] I can't speak on his behalf but I can

[05:39] say though that this impoundment act

[05:41] question will probably be heard this

[05:43] summer or sometime soon and if if it

[05:45] comes back the way it should which is

[05:47] this question again Hamilton and Madison

[05:49] and Jay who were the obviously the

[05:51] designers of and the explainers of the

[05:53] US Constitution they wanted spirited

[05:55] tension between the branches they they

[05:57] they wanted Collision they wanted the

[05:59] branches to kind of not to be at war

[06:01] with each other but to have different

[06:03] opinions on how governing should this

[06:06] idea that the executive branch must bend

[06:08] a knee because Congress has appropriated

[06:10] the money and so look in addition to

[06:13] that is if we can get this is where the

[06:15] other thing is that I was pushing for

[06:17] and I don't think it's going to happen

[06:18] is if we can reauthorize the

[06:19] presidential reorganization act which

[06:21] has been authorized in many times which

[06:23] essentially says if an agency can do the

[06:26] work that is duplicative of another

[06:27] agency it no longer needs to exist yes

[06:29] so let's just take the Department of

[06:30] Education which needs to end it the

[06:32] Department of Education needs to be shut

[06:33] down do you guys agree and the

[06:35] Department of Education so do you

[06:37] believe do you believe Lind McMahon

[06:39] because she's a great manager she's

[06:41] phenomenal is she a manage to the close

[06:46] she she shares the president's stated

[06:48] plan to close the Department of

[06:49] Education but let's just take three

[06:51] examples of how that can happen before

[06:53] you close it student loans what what

[06:55] that should be under Department of

[06:56] Treasury put that under treasury there's

[06:57] no reason should be there wait wait wait

[06:58] wait wait

[07:00] why do we have it that was the problem I

[07:02] agree that's going to require Congress

[07:04] like that's what I'm getting at though

[07:05] is at least you can break apart I agree

[07:08] we should get rid of any subsidized

[07:09] student loans I'm just getting at this

[07:11] is the way that you can actually weaken

[07:12] an agency to no longer exist through

[07:14] duplicative type processes right School

[07:17] assisted lunch you can make an argument

[07:18] for it or against it but School assisted

[07:21] lunch basically that the taxpayers need

[07:22] to you know pay for lunch that could be

[07:24] under Department of Agriculture they do

[07:25] food stamps much better done then

[07:27] finally they have this whole separate

[07:28] Office of the depart dep education that

[07:30] is Senate confirmed tier 2 position that

[07:32] is the office of civil rights put that

[07:34] under the Department of Justice they

[07:35] don't need your own civil rights

[07:37] division in the Department of Education

[07:39] that goes and harasses our Christian

[07:40] schools and goes after conservative kids

[07:43] so you can completely close that that's

[07:44] three functions all of a sudden the

[07:46] Department of Education inherently

[07:47] weakens and and you know this Glenn the

[07:49] Department of Education actually never

[07:50] existed it used to be called HW health

[07:53] education and Welfare Y and in fact we

[07:56] could we could REM merge these together

[07:58] and then we could find duplicative type

[08:00] processes and better better synergies

[08:03] that is even before we get more to the

[08:04] fundamental question of which I have and

[08:06] you have I don't think the Department of

[08:08] Education is constitutional I I do not

[08:10] think that is in the original intent as

[08:13] written that the federal government has

[08:15] any role in the education of our

[08:17] children period what what progressives

[08:19] do understand but the actual voter that

[08:22] votes usually what Democrats don't

[08:24] understand is uh I don't have a problem

[08:28] with the way you live in California you

[08:31] want you want to live in California and

[08:32] you want to you know be as insane as you

[08:35] are you can do that your own Community

[08:38] can vote for that and that's that's fine

[08:40] I'm not going to pay for it and don't

[08:42] force me to live that way you know uh

[08:47] and that's unfortunately the problem we

[08:49] have San Francisco values right in small

[08:52] towns that do not agree with those

[08:54] values at all and it's forced upon them

[08:56] it's forced upon them because it's

[08:58] Federal the office ofil rights to

[08:59] Department of Education and even worse I

[09:01] mean you guys remember this was not a

[09:03] very covered um issue the Department of

[09:06] Education was using School assisted

[09:08] lunch funding to force transgender

[09:11] bathrooms do you remember this it was a

[09:12] was a lesson like they said we are not

[09:14] going to give money for kids that need

[09:17] assistance for lunch if you don't have

[09:19] radical transgender policies so what

[09:21] we've done is we've created this insane

[09:23] leverage that the Department of

[09:25] Education should not have over local

[09:27] municipalities in school districts and

[09:29] the good news is Linda McMahon I believe

[09:31] will do two things I I could say just

[09:32] believe looking as on the outside two

[09:34] things concurrently she wants to shut it

[09:36] down but also fix as much as we can and

[09:38] reverse as much as we can no more CRT

[09:40] for schools we're going to not send any

[09:41] federal money after schools that are

[09:42] teaching Dei and day one there needs to

[09:45] be a massive push to the NCAA the NCAA

[09:48] itself as an official bodying

[09:50] organization that the federal government

[09:52] will not send another dime of taxpayer

[09:54] dollars if men are competing in female

[09:56] sports we will not tolerate that

[09:57] absolutely it's not going to happen yeah

[09:59] and so there's a lot that we can do in

[10:01] the interim to help reverse some of this

[10:04] nonsense we've been living through but

[10:05] to answer the question is Trump going to

[10:07] just shut down agencies he he does the

[10:10] question is can he and and that's the

[10:12] that's the Constitutional question it's

[10:13] going to go to the Supreme Court and the

[10:15] the question there is do the federal

[10:18] workers in the

[10:21] administration work for the president or

[10:24] does the president work for them this is

[10:26] the fundamental question I mean and if

[10:29] if if you are part of the administration

[10:31] that is a branch of the government that

[10:33] is separate but equal and the you have

[10:37] to have an executive that's running

[10:38] you're totally right and thanks to

[10:40] president Trump with what he did in the

[10:42] first term I think Glen we finally have

[10:43] a supreme court that's willing to weigh

[10:46] in and look the the West Virginia vepa

[10:49] case um other constitutional cases that

[10:52] we've seen in recent years are getting

[10:54] at the fundamental question of wait a

[10:56] second the authoring the birth of the

[10:59] administrative state is illegitimate the

[11:01] administrative State itself is an

[11:02] illegitimate experiment that you cannot

[11:04] author regulation without Congress in

[11:06] fact said differently that the entire

[11:09] premise that there is a fourth branch of

[11:11] government that is unelected unknown Y

[11:13] and unchecked is against our birth

[11:16] certificate and so I think we're finally

[11:18] I think the Overton window has moved in

[11:20] up you you wrote a book called Overton

[11:21] window years ago it was a great book

[11:22] growing up I read it it's finally moved

[11:24] enough where I think the American people

[11:25] can stomach it and here's why I love

[11:28] what doge is doing if they do nothing

[11:29] else than just live tweet the government

[11:32] waste that they find in real time they

[11:34] will have done a great service to this

[11:36] country I mean don't underestimate the

[11:37] exposure of things oh I I think we saw

[11:41] the Trump Doge machine on Wednesday you

[11:46] know you you can talk all you want but

[11:47] when the president and Elon Musk and the

[11:51] rest of us have a leader that says Nope

[11:54] stop this right now the American people

[11:56] stood up and it stopped and and here's

[11:59] here's what's amazing thanks to Elon

[12:00] Musk purchasing X and turning it into a

[12:02] more po we didn't have to go through any

[12:03] of the mainstream media it just we just

[12:05] did it in fact what the media is now

[12:07] doing the media networks are now just

[12:09] reporting what they're reading on X we

[12:11] can do that we don't need to watch them

[12:12] for that they're literally just reading

[12:14] x and they're like well now breaking on

[12:15] X okay I got that I could do it in real

[12:17] time I don't need your intermediary and

[12:19] so it's it's a decentralization and a

[12:21] small D democratization of the flow of

[12:23] information uh I I will tell you um when

[12:27] uh we were talking about Time Magazine

[12:29] and the person of the year obvious

[12:31] there's no other choice than Donald

[12:33] Trump he is the guy who's going to he's

[12:35] going to change the whole world and if

[12:37] he does what he said he will be

[12:39] remembered as another Abraham Lincoln

[12:41] kind of guy kind of figure I think

[12:43] you're right um an anti FDR Wilson um

[12:47] however the only other choice could have

[12:50] been Elon Musk I I I think that's right

[12:53] he he did more to save our country just

[12:56] by buying X than anything else I think

[12:58] you'll appreciate this I said it when it

[13:00] happened and now it's proven to be true

[13:02] it's the most important transaction

[13:04] since the Louisiana Purchase yeah and of

[13:07] of scale and importance and I believe it

[13:09] was the cause that was set in motion y

[13:12] that helped us save our civilization

Link copied to clipboard!