Charlie Kirk Debates 20 Woke College Students on Abortion, Kamala Harris, and Border Security at Jubilee

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Defends Trump, Debates Abortion and Feminism at Cambridge Union in Heated Exchange

Charlie Kirk Defends Trump, Debates Abortion and Feminism at Cambridge Union in Heated Exchange

1:06:27

Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Address Immigration, Abortion, and Border Security at College Q&A Session

Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Address Immigration, Abortion, and Border Security at College Q&A Session

5:53

Charlie Kirk Challenges Student on Abortion, Immigration, and the Echo Chamber Accusation at Campus Event

Charlie Kirk Challenges Student on Abortion, Immigration, and the Echo Chamber Accusation at Campus Event

8:09

Charlie Kirk Debates 20 Woke College Students on Abortion, Kamala Harris, and Border Security at Jubilee

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, faces off against 20 college students in a viral Jubilee debate that garnered 1.5 million views in just 7 hours. The discussion covers abortion from conception to birth, with Kirk defending the position that abortion is murder and should be illegal. Students challenge him on everything from fetal viability and women's bodily autonomy to extreme cases involving rape and underage pregnancy. The debate also features discussions on Kamala Harris's record as vice president, border security failures, and the definition of murder versus justified killing. Kirk systematically addresses claims about parasitic fetuses, brain waves at six weeks, and the scientific basis for when life begins.

December 27, 2024

Jubilee's Viral Debate Format Puts Charlie Kirk in the Hot Seat

Charlie Kirk found himself surrounded by 20 college students in a Jubilee Media debate that quickly went viral, accumulating 1.5 million views within the first 7 hours of posting. The founder of Turning Point USA opened with a provocative prompt: abortion is murder and should be illegal. What followed was a rapid-fire exchange where students challenged Kirk's positions on abortion, Kamala Harris, border security, and police profiling.

The format allowed students to raise red flags when they disagreed, creating a visual timer effect that added urgency to each exchange. Kirk appeared prepared for the challenges, systematically addressing arguments about fetal viability, women's rights, and the legal versus moral status of unborn children.

Defining Terms: What Constitutes Abortion and Murder

Kirk began by establishing clear definitions with the students. He defined abortion as "the forcible ending of the viability of a being in utero otherwise known as a fetus," and murder as "the intentional taking of life with intent." When a Catholic student named Juliana agreed with these definitions but argued that judging others isn't Christian, Kirk pivoted to whether society should prevent murder generally.

The definitional debate became more contentious when students challenged whether abortion necessarily involves the death of a fetus. One student suggested a C-section could be considered an abortion, while another argued that a fetus is "technically classified as a parasite until it is viable." Kirk rejected this characterization, asking if elderly people with Alzheimer's who require assistance should also be considered parasites.

The Viability Argument and Six-Week Heartbeats

Naima, one of the students, argued that viability occurs at 24 to 26 weeks, though Kirk corrected this to note that the youngest survivor in a NICU was born at 20 weeks in San Diego. The debate then shifted to what gives a fetus moral worth. Kirk asked why a six-week-old fetus with a heartbeat, its own DNA, fingerprints, and brain waves has less moral worth than an 88-year-old with dementia requiring assistance.

When challenged on the definition of "fetus," Kirk pointed out that the Latin root means "little human being." A student responded by calling his smile "very creepy," prompting laughter but also deflecting from the substantive argument. Kirk pressed on, asking what species the fetus belongs to and challenging the claim that it's a parasite rather than a living organism.

Brain Waves, Sentience, and Future Consciousness

The discussion of brain waves became particularly technical. One student argued that brain waves necessary for subjective experience don't develop until well past the first trimester, and that the same EEG scans showing early fetal brain activity also exist in brain-dead patients. Kirk countered that the difference is trajectory—a six-to-eight-week fetus with brain waves will develop increased consciousness if allowed to continue developing, unlike a brain-dead patient whose condition is irreversible.

Parker entered the debate with a philosophical challenge, asking if brain-dead patients should be allowed to be unplugged by family members. He argued for valuing "sentient life" rather than biological life, suggesting that abortion should be permitted before sentience develops around 18 to 26 weeks. Kirk found this position more reasonable than unlimited abortion, noting it was similar to Donald Trump's proposed 15-week ban.

Extreme Cases: Rape, Incest, and Child Pregnancy

The debate took an emotional turn when students raised the scenario of a 10-year-old rape victim forced to carry a pregnancy to term. Kirk maintained his position, arguing that the baby would be delivered (likely via C-section for safety), and that you cannot determine which ultrasound shows a baby conceived in love versus one conceived in rape—because all human life has equal moral worth regardless of the circumstances of conception.

One student became visibly upset, stating that carrying such a pregnancy would "ruin her life" and "torture" the child. Kirk responded that "the worst thing to do to that daughter is to then say we're going to go murder the being inside of you." He argued it would be a better story to "do something good in the face of evil instead of doing evil after evil." The student's final comment—hoping Kirk's daughter "lives a very happy life and gets away from you"—drew gasps from the room.

IUDs, Plan B, and Unintentional Killing

A particularly nuanced argument came from a student who asked whether women with IUDs are murderers, since IUDs can sometimes prevent implantation of a fertilized egg, effectively killing a "conceived zygote." Kirk distinguished between preventing fertilization (which Plan B does by preventing progesterone production) and preventing implantation of an already-fertilized egg.

When pressed on whether women with IUDs should go to prison for murder, Kirk said no, arguing they've been "deceived by mass culture and mass propaganda." He stated that abortionists—those who prescribe abortion pills and perform procedures—should face legal consequences, not the women themselves. This drew comparisons to historical pedophilia, with students asking if Kirk would retroactively prosecute people for actions that were legal in their time.

Legal Status Versus Moral Status

Students argued that fetuses don't receive birth certificates or Social Security cards, therefore they aren't legally alive and shouldn't receive moral consideration. Kirk rejected this "legal positivist position," arguing that legal status doesn't determine moral status. He pointed out that illegal immigrants don't have Social Security cards but obviously shouldn't be murdered, and that children can't vote but still have rights.

Kirk argued for tax deductions and child support for pregnant women, saying "don't threaten me with a good time" when students suggested pregnant women should receive government benefits if fetuses are considered people. He suggested this would incentivize fathers to stay with mothers and be more responsible.

Ben Shapiro Takes on Kamala Harris Supporters

The video also featured Ben Shapiro debating 25 Kamala Harris supporters on her abortion stance. Shapiro defined Harris's position as supporting abortion until birth with no regulations, which he found "morally indefensible." He noted that Harris has not stated any abortion law she would veto, including the partial birth abortion ban.

Interestingly, some Harris supporters agreed with Shapiro that late-term abortion is indefensible, though they disputed that this represents the majority Democratic position. Shapiro countered that Democrats have not supported any federal abortion restrictions in his lifetime, and would likely vote against a consensus 15-week ban similar to those in Europe.

The debate over definitions continued, with one student trying to argue that C-sections could be considered abortions. Shapiro insisted abortion specifically means "the forcible termination of an unborn human life," while the student wanted a broader definition of "ending a pregnancy." Shapiro cut through this by suggesting they simply discuss "the forcible termination of a fetus" to avoid semantic games.

Kamala Harris's Record: Border Czar and Criminal Justice

Dean Withers, a 19-year-old liberal who debates for a living, faced 20 Trump supporters and argued that Kamala Harris would be a better president than Donald Trump. He was immediately challenged on Harris's record as San Francisco District Attorney, where she allegedly had the highest conviction rate for minor offenses like marijuana possession.

The debate over her marijuana convictions became heated, with one person claiming she only convicted 45 people for marijuana possession while serving as DA. Others disputed this figure, arguing her office prosecuted thousands for small crimes. Harris's relationship with Willie Brown also came up, with critics claiming she "slept her way to the top" by dating Brown, who was legally divorced at the time. Defenders pointed out she received 4.5 million votes in her run for Attorney General and DA.

On border security, Trump supporters criticized Harris as the "border czar" who allowed millions of illegal immigrants into the country and lost track of over 300,000 migrant children potentially trafficked into sex slavery. They cited statistics showing fentanyl seizures increased from 2,500 pounds per year under Trump to over 14,000 pounds under Biden-Harris. Defenders countered that Harris and Biden attempted to pass bipartisan border legislation (Lankford's bill) that Trump killed by calling Republicans in Congress and telling them to vote against it.

Police Profiling and Systemic Racism

Kevin Donaldson, a retired New Jersey police officer, debated 20 people who identified as criminals about racial profiling. The central claim was that most police officers do not racially profile black and brown people. Critics immediately disagreed, stating police are "trained to degrade" minorities and humiliate them in front of their families.

When Donaldson asked what specific training teaches racial profiling, participants said it's just "how you guys are." One person from South Central Los Angeles described being repeatedly stopped by police without cause, though Donaldson pointed out that if this person had committed crimes in the past without being caught, perhaps police were simply doing their job when they did stop them.

The most emotional moment came when someone said "y'all killed my cousin for no reason" and declared hatred for all cops. Donaldson asked if that person was racist, defining racism as treating a group differently based on appearance. The participant insisted this was different because "y'all don't respect us at all." Donaldson countered that making sweeping generalizations about all cops based on negative interactions with some is exactly the kind of prejudice people claim to oppose.

The Statistics and the Reality

Throughout these debates, both sides wielded statistics. Kirk cited 4,000 abortions per day in America, totaling 1.6 million per year. After Roe v. Wade was overturned, states like Texas, Alabama, and Mississippi saw dramatic decreases in abortions, with thousands of babies now alive who would have been aborted. Critics argued that illegal abortions still happen and aren't counted in official statistics.

On police violence, participants noted that black Americans represent 13-17% of the population but are disproportionately incarcerated and killed by police. Donaldson attributed this partly to economics—those who can afford good lawyers are less likely to be convicted or incarcerated. He acknowledged the legal system is "run by human beings" who are "flawed," making perfect justice impossible.

The border statistics showed 14,000 pounds of fentanyl crossing annually under Biden-Harris compared to 2,500 under Trump, with over 300,000 migrant children unaccounted for. HR2, which allegedly would have secured the border, passed the House but sat on Chuck Schumer's desk in the Senate. Meanwhile, the bipartisan Senate bill (Lankford's bill) never made it out of the Senate, with each side blaming the other for its failure.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!