Up Next

Charlie Kirk Dismantles Socialist Arguments on Life Expectancy, Marxism, and Free Market Capitalism

Charlie Kirk Dismantles Socialist Arguments on Life Expectancy, Marxism, and Free Market Capitalism

9:04

Capitalism vs Socialism Debate: Freedom, Property and Peaceful Coexistence

Capitalism vs Socialism Debate: Freedom, Property and Peaceful Coexistence

1:57

Charlie Kirk Debates Socialism Versus Capitalism: Roads, Fire Departments, and Government Monopolies

Charlie Kirk Debates Socialism Versus Capitalism: Roads, Fire Departments, and Government Monopolies

3:38

Charlie Kirk Debates Retired Federal Employee on Socialism, Government Waste, and Constitutional Limits

Categories: Socialism Sucks
December 26, 2021

Charlie Kirk engages in a spirited campus debate with a retired Department of Agriculture employee about the definition of socialism, government efficiency, and constitutional authority. The conversation explores whether publicly funded services constitute socialism, the challenges of firing inefficient federal workers under civil service protections, and why market-based solutions often outperform government bureaucracies. Kirk argues for localized government over federal expansion while acknowledging the legitimate role of basic public services.

A Campus Conversation on Socialism and Government Size

Charlie Kirk engaged in a detailed debate with a retired federal employee about socialism, government efficiency, and the proper scope of government authority. The conversation began with Kirk challenging the individual to name where socialism has actually worked, leading to a discussion about income taxes and whether they constitute a socialist system.

The retired employee, who worked in payroll for the Department of Agriculture processing 700,000 paychecks twice a month for most of the government, revealed an interesting perspective from inside the federal bureaucracy. When asked whether he trusted the government, he affirmed that he did, despite Kirk pointing out issues like reckless audits of political opponents and massive bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Inside the Federal Bureaucracy

Kirk pressed the retired employee about waste within the Department of Agriculture, particularly in the food stamp program. The employee readily admitted there was "definitely" waste in the department. When asked about incompetent government employees and whether they get fired, the employee revealed that the government often hired contractors to do the work of underperforming employees rather than terminating them.

Kirk highlighted how difficult it is to fire government employees under civil service protections, noting the bureaucratic inefficiency this creates. The employee mentioned the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), claiming a 90% approval rate for dismissals, though the difficulty of removing poor performers remained a point of contention.

Finding Common Ground on Government Size

Despite their differences, both Kirk and the retired employee agreed on several key points. The employee admitted that government is too big and acknowledged the inefficiencies within the system. This admission led Kirk to emphasize their shared ground: government has grown beyond its proper scope and operates inefficiently in many areas.

The conversation then shifted to specific government programs. Kirk questioned the value of forcing young people into Social Security, arguing that annualized growth rates are "lackluster at best" and that the government takes seven percent of younger generations' earnings to subsidize older Americans. He distinguished between a "safety net" and a "hammock," suggesting the employee might agree with that framework.

Defining Socialism

The debate evolved into a definitional discussion about what socialism actually means. The retired employee defined it as "where everybody pays in together for the common good," using public university funding as an example. He argued that many people couldn't attend university without government subsidies.

Kirk countered by pointing out that private institutions exist and work quite well through donations. When the employee suggested these work on "socialism," Kirk turned the argument around: if college tuition that rises every year, runs inefficiently with unchecked administrators and unaccountable professors is the example of socialism, then it's precisely something that doesn't work.

Constitutional Intent and Market Solutions

Kirk articulated his core position: government has "gone outside of its constitutional intent and authority" and market-based solutions are "far better for the well-being of its citizens than government bureaucracies are." He acknowledged that certain government functions are necessary—police, firefighters, and the military—but argued these should be handled at the most localized level possible rather than federalized.

The employee shared a personal example of his wife being admitted to graduate school with a full-ride scholarship to study animation. Kirk used this to reinforce his point: "Nothing is free. Somebody's paying for something at some point of the transaction." He rejected the idea of people living on "the forced extraction of wealth from others" except for basic services like police, fire, roads, and the national military.

The Limits of Government Services

Kirk expressed opposition to several federal departments, including the Department of Education and Department of Labor, viewing them as examples of socialism that he doesn't support. When asked about roads, he advocated for private roads where feasible or, at minimum, the most localized government control possible, criticizing the Department of Transportation as "a mess" that's "widely inefficient."

The conversation concluded with Kirk pointing to the Veterans Administration as another example of a socialist program that "runs horribly," reinforcing his argument that government monopolization of social utilities represents the worst parts of our society. Throughout the exchange, Kirk maintained that while some government is necessary, the current federal bureaucracy has expanded far beyond its proper constitutional limits and operates with unacceptable levels of waste and inefficiency.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:02] does it

[00:02] yeah

[00:03] where is socialism work

[00:05] where is socialism worked

[00:07] you pay your income tax income tax is

[00:09] not socialist it's not

[00:11] no yeah well i think it's way too high

[00:13] isn't it

[00:14] yeah but sexualism is where everybody

[00:16] pays in why don't you do you give more

[00:18] money than your income tax every year to

[00:19] the government

[00:21] do you give more than what the

[00:22] government asks you to give each year

[00:24] yeah i do you do

[00:25] you give more to the government yeah so

[00:27] you give more than what the irs asks you

[00:29] to give yeah you do

[00:32] so you think that do you trust the

[00:33] government i don't take all the

[00:34] deductions that i'm entitled to do you

[00:37] trust the government

[00:39] of course they do

[00:40] you do yeah you trust the government

[00:42] that

[00:45] recklessly

[00:46] audits people they disagree with and

[00:48] runs inefficiently and

[00:50] has huge bureaucracies of nothingness

[00:54] i'm a retired federal employee

[00:57] which agency department of agriculture

[00:59] okay

[01:01] so do you think there's any waste in the

[01:03] food stamp a lot men in the department

[01:04] of agriculture

[01:06] yeah definitely oh so you do think

[01:08] government is wasteful

[01:09] well we have to do something we're not

[01:10] perfect well that's a horrible argument

[01:13] to spend trillions of dollars having to

[01:15] do something

[01:16] isn't it you just admitted you were you

[01:18] worked for the department of agriculture

[01:20] which oversees the distribution of food

[01:23] stamps right and you actually what i did

[01:25] was well part of what the department of

[01:27] agriculture does is

[01:29] you did payroll for the department of

[01:31] agriculture well for most of the

[01:33] government okay you wrote 700 000

[01:36] paychecks twice a month so did you know

[01:38] of any government employees that were

[01:40] not very good at their job

[01:42] did they get fired

[01:44] man they hired contractors to do their

[01:46] work

[01:47] so but did the employee the government

[01:48] employees get fired

[01:51] for not doing their job

[01:54] i find that very hard to believe

[01:58] it's very hard under civil service

[02:00] protection to lose your job in the

[02:01] government bureaucracy

[02:03] very difficult if you go to the mspb

[02:05] you'll see that they have 90 approval

[02:08] rate for dismissing people do you think

[02:10] government is too big

[02:12] yeah

[02:13] okay then you and i are in agreement

[02:16] we agree that there's an efficiency and

[02:18] so that's that's our whole argument i'm

[02:20] saying socialism is what our

[02:21] government's about no it's not

[02:24] part of the worst parts of it might be

[02:26] but i i reject those parts of government

[02:28] book parts

[02:32] yeah that would be a good start food

[02:34] stamps are too much how's in urban

[02:35] development department of education what

[02:37] about social security

[02:39] i don't think i don't think young people

[02:41] should be forced into paying something

[02:42] we're not going to see

[02:43] social security annualized growth rates

[02:45] are lackluster at best the government

[02:48] takes seven percent of our generation's

[02:49] earnings to subsidize older americans

[02:52] have you seen the homeless problem

[02:54] that's the same people that can't sure

[02:55] work for a living

[02:57] problem yeah i mean i think there should

[02:59] be a safety net but not a hammock i

[03:00] think you'd agree with that

[03:04] define what you mean by socialism though

[03:06] because i think we might be taking uh

[03:08] where everybody pays in together

[03:10] everybody pays in for the common good

[03:12] for the common good

[03:14] this university here how many people

[03:16] could go to school here if it wasn't for

[03:18] the government paying part anybody could

[03:20] pay for an education sure there's

[03:21] private institutions that exist sure

[03:23] there are yeah but how do they work

[03:25] quite well because of donations it's

[03:27] they work on socialism so if your

[03:29] example of socialism is college tuition

[03:32] that rises every year that is run widely

[03:35] inefficient administrators that are

[03:36] unchecked professors that should be

[03:38] fired then you and i have the same

[03:39] definition of socialism which is

[03:41] something that doesn't work

[03:43] so here's the thing is i think

[03:44] government is far too big it's gone

[03:46] outside of its constitutional intent and

[03:48] authority and market-based solutions are

[03:50] far better for the well-being of its

[03:52] citizens than government bureaucracies

[03:54] are yeah but there are some things that

[03:55] have to be paid of course no i agree

[03:57] with that police firefighters

[03:59] but wouldn't you agree it's better on a

[04:00] localized level than a nationalized

[04:02] level

[04:03] yeah definitely okay so we agree so

[04:05] localize more government programs don't

[04:07] federalize them

[04:09] but you still have to have government

[04:10] even if it's at the local level sure i'm

[04:12] not an anarchist and that's not

[04:14] socialism

[04:15] okay but my point was that nobody here

[04:17] could go to school if they had to pay

[04:19] for all the cops they do pay for it in

[04:21] tax somebody pays for it somewhere

[04:23] whether it be taxes or the endowment or

[04:24] donations or tuition

[04:26] you know you actually pay for school

[04:27] here the taxpayers mostly the sports

[04:29] program

[04:30] well and taxpayers it is a it is a

[04:32] publicly funded school i would imagine

[04:34] right

[04:35] you know the state school

[04:36] who was admitted to the graduate school

[04:38] had a full-ride scholarship for two

[04:40] years as a graduate student

[04:44] study animation okay

[04:46] so she wasn't paying at a time

[04:48] but somebody paid for it yeah at some

[04:50] point nothing is free somebody's paying

[04:52] for something at some point of the

[04:53] transaction right if they had money it

[04:55] was socialism that somebody paid for it

[04:58] a lot of people right so i i don't i

[04:59] don't support that i don't support other

[05:01] people being able to live on the

[05:03] well-being of the forced extraction of

[05:05] wealth from others

[05:06] i believe for the paying of basic

[05:08] services

[05:09] such as police and fire

[05:11] roads and bridges on the most localized

[05:13] level possible as well as the national

[05:14] military do i believe in the department

[05:16] of education no department of labor no

[05:18] that's our socialism

[05:20] that's why i don't support it

[05:22] you don't believe that we should have

[05:23] roads we should have private roads and

[05:24] people pay for them as they usually i

[05:26] believe as localized as you possibly can

[05:28] be the department of transportation is a

[05:29] mess

[05:31] it's widely inefficient it doesn't work

[05:33] well at all

[05:35] yeah so i mean you're making my argument

[05:37] for me no i'm not i'm saying that that

[05:39] we still have to have socialism even if

[05:41] it isn't

[05:42] uh okay so you you

[05:44] your your example is social so socialism

[05:47] is the government run of of social

[05:50] utilities essentially the government

[05:52] used to the the government

[05:55] monopolization of social utilities

[05:57] and the worst parts of our society such

[05:59] as the veterans administration which

[06:01] runs horribly is a socialist program

[06:09] you

Link copied to clipboard!