2,279 videos 1,365,173,983 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Exposes the Ukraine-Zelenskyy Oval Office Fallout and What America Must Do Next
Charlie Kirk breaks down the explosive Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy that ended in disaster. Kirk argues Trump spent 40 minutes extending an official state visit with full honors, only to be met with hostility and threats from Zelenskyy. With over 1.2 million dead and Ukraine's average soldier age at 43, Kirk questions what Zelenskyy is really fighting for, especially since he cancelled elections. Kirk examines whether Zelenskyy was coached to sabotage peace talks, the role of warmongering neocons like Lindsey Graham, and why European leaders suddenly rallied around Zelenskyy. He warns that British troops in Ukraine could trigger NATO Article 5 and drag America into war. Kirk celebrates Trump's refusal to be bullied into endless conflict, calling it a president who finally puts America first.
President Trump rolled out the red carpet for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyyy, providing an official state visit complete with honor guards lining the driveway and all the trappings of diplomatic respect. Trump sat there for 40 minutes, engaging in what should have been productive peace negotiations. Instead, Zelenskyy walked in with his arms crossed, displaying open hostility and effectively threatening the United States of America.
The fallout was immediate and severe. According to Charlie Kirk, this was a disgraceful performance that humiliated America on the world stage and reinforced suspicions among European partners that America can no longer be trusted as an ally. But Kirk sees it differently than the media establishment. This wasn't Trump's failure—it was Zelenskyy's refusal to engage with the high-stakes diplomacy Trump was offering.
The Devastating Reality of Ukraine's War
The numbers tell a grim story. Over 1.2 million people have been killed in this conflict. The average age of a Ukrainian soldier is now 43 years old. Ukraine is taking aging fathers out of communities and farms and putting them on the front lines into what Kirk calls "the meat grinder." Ukraine has become one of the oldest countries in the world demographically, burning up their future and destroying their demography.
Kirk asks the fundamental question: for what? An extra 50 miles of land that Ukraine may or may not control? He argues it's time for Zelenskyy to strike a deal, but Zelenskyy appears to have other goals and means to get there.
The Election Question Nobody Wants to Answer
Zelenskyy keeps claiming his people want to continue fighting, but Kirk raises a critical point: how does Zelenskyy know what his people want if he doesn't have elections? Zelenskyy cancelled elections, so nobody knows if he even has the support of his people anymore.
Abraham Lincoln had an election in the midst of the American Civil War. FDR had elections in the midst of World War II. It's possible to conduct elections during conflict and strife. But Zelenskyy has implemented martial law that has seen the shuttering of opposition newspapers, opposition political parties, and religious groups not aligned with his political preferences. There's no democratic accountability.
Was Zelenskyy Coached to Sabotage Peace Talks?
Molly Hemingway from The Federalist joined Kirk to analyze what happened. She noted that it was bizarre to watch Zelenskyy go into a meeting ostensibly designed to advance peace negotiations and see him being unbelievably hostile. Zelenskyy had met with various members of Congress prior to the meeting, and as everything blew up, they started talking about how they had counseled him beforehand.
Lindsey Graham even admitted he counseled Zelenskyy not to behave the way he ultimately behaved. Graham told Zelenskyy that morning: "Don't take the bait. Don't let the media or anybody else get you into an argument with President Trump." The New York Post published a piece the day before the meeting telling Zelenskyy to take his case directly to the American people because Trump's position supposedly isn't popular.
Zelenskyy was getting substantial advice and coaching to behave in exactly the manner he displayed in the Oval Office.
What Does Zelenskyy Really Want?
Kirk and Hemingway explored what Zelenskyy's endgame might be. While you wouldn't typically say a man whose country has been destroyed by war wants more war, there are aspects of ending this conflict that might not go well for Zelenskyy personally.
Zelenskyy hasn't held democratic elections for an extended period. Hemingway noted he's legitimately concerned that if elections were held, he might not win, which would raise serious questions about what his life will be like once peace is established. Zelenskyy and his allies in America and throughout the world are seeking U.S. security guarantees.
But what does a security guarantee actually mean? Ultimately, it means nothing unless it involves U.S. troops willing to go on the ground to defend Ukraine. That's not what the American people want, but it's absolutely what the media complex wants, what the neocons want, and what Europe wants. They want American troops and American money backing this security guarantee.
Lindsey Graham Turns on Zelenskyy
In a stunning development, Lindsey Graham—one of the chief neocons and grand leaders of the war machine—quickly cast Zelenskyy aside after the meeting. Graham said Zelenskyy should "profusely apologize" for the way he treated the President and Vice President in the Oval Office and show gratitude for what the American people have done.
Zelenskyy did not apologize. Kirk asked Hemingway why Graham, who alongside a few others designs these conflicts and stays up late thinking about what countries to invade next, was so quick to abandon Zelenskyy. Hemingway's analysis was revealing: Lindsey Graham cares more about continuing the war in Ukraine than he cares about Zelenskyy. When Graham saw Zelenskyy completely implode in the Oval Office meeting, he realized the best chance for the war to continue is to get rid of Zelenskyy. That way, someone else comes in, you get a fresh start, and you can continue negotiations.
Susan Rice's Suspicious Immediate Response
Molly Hemingway identified something particularly interesting about the aftermath. Immediately after everything blew up, Susan Rice went on CNN to discuss the situation. Her appearance raised several red flags.
First, Rice openly opposed the peace deal that would be good for the United States—shocking to see from a former National Security Adviser. Second, she revealed detailed knowledge of what was in the mineral agreement, suggesting deep insight into the deal Trump wanted Zelenskyy to sign regarding Ukrainian minerals that could help repay American taxpayers. Third, she used the same talking point as Zelenskyy about "concrete security agreements," meaning U.S. troops on the ground. Fourth, she mischaracterized Trump's behavior.
Hemingway noted that Susan Rice runs information operations, which she did with the Benghazi disaster when she immediately lied and said the attack on September 11 was just an organic protest about a YouTube video rather than an Islamist attack. Rice was also involved in the Russia collusion operation, part of that tiny meeting at the end of the Obama Administration where they hatched what to do with the Russia investigation.
The fact that Rice—who hasn't been heard from in quite some time—was out there immediately with this information operation suggests she might have been knowledgeable of the effort to get Zelenskyy to do what he did.
Europe's Sudden Tough Talk and the NATO Article 5 Danger
Right after the Oval Office meeting blew up, European leaders started tweeting support for Zelenskyy. Then Keir Starmer hosted a summit for Zelenskyy that weekend, with leaders getting on planes to come surround him. Kirk points out that if you believed this was staged, this certainly plays into that theory.
The Europeans claim they're going to defend Ukraine and dramatically increase defense spending. Kirk's response: why does America have to fund 70% of NATO when our GDP is roughly equal with all of Europe combined? If Europe responded by upping their defense spending and taking more responsibility for their security, that would be mission accomplished.
But there's a dangerous element to watch. Keir Starmer, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, says he's going to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine. Here's the problem: as soon as a single British troop is killed, it could trigger NATO Article 5—the mutual defense agreement where an attack on one is an attack on all.
If the UK puts 10,000 troops in Ukraine and Russia kills 100 British soldiers, that triggers Article 5, meaning American soldiers might be next and the U.S. could be dragged into the conflict. Kirk argues Trump needs to get out in front of this and call all these leaders to stop their posturing while he brokers peace.
A President Who Finally Puts America First
CNN's Christiane Amanpour said she had never seen anything like this meeting in the history of modern diplomacy. Kirk agrees—but for a completely different reason. He's never seen a president so resolutely putting the nation first, drawing a line and saying "No, go fight your own war if you want to stand on your own. That is not our obligation."
Trump made clear America is here for peace and ceasefire, but the red line is that America will not be bullied into a conflict. The media and war machine want us to believe Russia is coming for America next, but Kirk rejects this entirely. America has an ocean separating it from Russia, a great military, and a wealthy economy. Ukraine doesn't have these advantages.
Kirk celebrates what he sees as refreshing: finally, a president putting America first. The warmongering media complex and permanent bureaucratic elite want U.S. Marines in Kiev. That's not going to happen. Peace is a threat to the war mongers—if there's permanent peace, what will these people do all day long? What's the job justification for the permanent generals?
This whole situation puts on display the military-industrial complex and the permanent unelected bureaucratic elite. There will be no winner in this war, only losers. This is what's called a Pyrrhic victory—where even if you win, you lose. Even if you're the winner, you have no people left. Entire generations are missing, towns are gone, and Zelenskyy won't come to the table.
Trump is doing high-stakes diplomacy, offering to broker an end to the killing and a peace deal that will transcend all peace deals. But the war mongers in America and Zelenskyy, blinded by war, stand in the way. Kirk's message is clear: it's time to cast aside those who refuse peace and focus on what's best for the American people.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.