Charlie Kirk Offers To Be Elon Musk's Ombudsman After Billionaire Takes Red Pills on Russia Hoax
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Charlie Sykes and Tom Nichols Dissect Charlie Kirk's Astonishing Historical Illiteracy and Modern Conservative Dysfunction
43:01
Stephen A. Smith Sits Down With Candace Owens On Israel, Iran, Trump's Betrayal Of MAGA Movement
58:37
The Disturbing Truth About Charlie Kirk's Views: A Compilation of His Own Words
17:28
Charlie Kirk Offers To Be Elon Musk's Ombudsman After Billionaire Takes Red Pills on Russia Hoax
Charlie Kirk reacts to Elon Musk's tweets about the Clinton campaign lawyer creating what Musk called an "elaborate hoax" about Trump and Russia. Kirk offers his services as an advisor to help channel Musk's newfound conservative positions, celebrating that the billionaire is now agreeing with Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. The commentary explores the desperation of conservative figures to claim Musk as one of their own, despite his inconsistent positions on issues like China and his questionable Twitter acquisition tactics.
Charlie Kirk expressed enthusiasm about Elon Musk's transformation, offering to serve as the billionaire's ombudsman or advisor. Kirk noted that Musk has taken "a steady dose of red pills" and needs help channeling that energy effectively.
The conservative commentator highlighted a tweet from Musk stating that "most people don't know that a Clinton campaign lawyer using campaign funds created an elaborate hoax about Trump and Russia," adding "makes you wonder what else is fake." Kirk celebrated this as evidence of Musk's alignment with conservative media personalities.
Inviting Musk to the Team
Kirk acknowledged that Donald Trump had issued a critical statement against Musk, suggesting the billionaire only wanted to be involved because of regulatory problems. However, Kirk disagreed with this assessment, stating he believed conservatives should try to invite Musk onto their team instead.
Kirk emphasized his excitement that Musk was calling the Russia investigation a "hoax," noting that five years ago, only Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and others were using that term. He expressed amazement that "the billionaire industrialist from South Africa is agreeing with Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson."
The Desperation for Cool Factor
Commentary on Kirk's reaction highlighted what was described as desperation within conservative circles to claim any figure perceived as cool or culturally relevant. The observation noted this pattern extends to other instances, such as featuring Clint Eastwood at conventions despite potential embarrassment.
Critics pointed out the irony that conservative figures typically hate Hollywood, athletes, elites, and electric cars, but eagerly embrace anyone from those worlds who shows any conservative leanings. The commentary suggested this stems from deeper cultural insecurities within the conservative movement.
Selective Accountability Standards
The discussion noted hypocrisy in how Kirk and similar commentators hold different public figures accountable. While they criticize athletes like LeBron James for not speaking out about China's human rights issues, they give Musk a complete pass despite his being "a massive wimp" when it comes to criticizing China.
This selective standard reveals how willing these commentators are to overlook inconsistencies when someone aligns with their political positions.
The Twitter Acquisition Debacle
Commentary addressed Musk's attempt to back out of the Twitter acquisition by claiming he just discovered the platform has bot problems. The absurdity of this claim was highlighted, noting that Musk, who benefits from Twitter bots more than perhaps anyone else on the platform, would suddenly be shocked by their existence.
The discussion examined Musk's supposed business acumen, questioning how a genius businessman would offer $46 billion for a social media company without doing due diligence on its primary asset: actual users. The failure to make the offer contingent on representations about user counts versus bot accounts was described as a fundamental business failure, suggesting the entire acquisition was never a serious endeavor but rather a PR exercise.