Up Next
SimpleBlackTheory on Charlie Kirk's Assassination: Free Speech, Gun Laws, and Political Chaos
1:09:05
Barack and Michelle Obama Rally Democrats at DNC Night Two with Julia Louis-Dreyfus and Senator Laphonza Butler
1:05:35
Fox News Jesse Watters Reveals New Evidence in Charlie Kirk Murder: Texts, Secret Note, and Death Penalty Charges
12:26
Jon Favreau Discusses Media Response to Charlie Kirk Shooting and Social Media's Corrosive Impact
Jon Favreau joins a candid conversation about the political aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting and the deeply troubling role social media plays in modern discourse. Favreau reflects on the stark contrast between how political leaders respond to tragedy, the dangers of our fractured media ecosystem, and why he believes social media has become a cancer on society. Drawing from his experience as Obama's speechwriter and host of Pod Save America and Offline, Favreau offers insights into how we might begin to reconnect as human beings in an increasingly digital world.
The Immediate Aftermath and Political Response
In the wake of the Charlie Kirk shooting, a familiar pattern emerged across the political landscape. Before authorities had even identified the suspect, right-wing commentators and Republican officials rushed to assign blame to Democrats and the left. Clips circulated widely featuring statements like "The Democrats just killed Charlie Kirk today" and "When is the Democrats going to stand up and apologize for the hatred and the lies that they have fed their base that's led to these actions."
Jon Favreau, host of Pod Save America and former Obama speechwriter, addressed these inflammatory responses head-on. When authorities apprehended the suspect, initial reporting suggested someone with Republican parents, deeply immersed in online culture. Favreau emphasized that the shooter appeared to be "terminally online," a characteristic shared by many mass shooters, rather than someone driven by a coherent political ideology.
Jesse Watters and Donald Trump both used the moment to declare that Democrats were "at war" with conservatives. Trump himself released a recorded address framing the shooting as part of a larger conflict with leftism. Favreau pushed back firmly against this narrative, stating unequivocally: "We're not at war. We don't—we want you to lose in the next election."
Contrasting Leadership in Times of Crisis
The conversation took a particularly pointed turn when examining Trump's response to questions about how he was holding up after the Charlie Kirk shooting. Rather than expressing grief or concern, Trump immediately pivoted to discussing construction of a new White House ballroom, calling it "a beauty" that would be "one of the best anywhere in the world actually."
Favreau contrasted this with his personal experience working for President Obama in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook shooting. He shared an intimate moment when he brought Obama the initial statement to review. "When he handed me the edits, he couldn't even look up from the desk because he was very emotional," Favreau recalled. That genuine emotion wasn't manufactured for public consumption—it was simply who Obama was.
Regarding Trump's response, Favreau offered several possible explanations: Trump might genuinely lack empathy due to sociopathic tendencies, he might refuse to show vulnerability because everything is about projecting strength, or his attention might simply bounce around as rapidly as a social media feed. Regardless of the reason, the contrast between the two leaders' responses couldn't have been starker.
The Fractured Media Ecosystem
A central concern Favreau raised was the bifurcation of America's media landscape. When Fox News, Megyn Kelly, Jesse Watters, and Republican lawmakers all broadcast the same message—that Democrats are at war with conservatives—millions of viewers consuming only that ecosystem come away with a completely distorted view of reality.
"This has been our concern forever with the right-wing media ecosystem," Favreau acknowledged. The challenge is that people watching Fox News aren't simultaneously consuming left-leaning perspectives. Their understanding of what progressives believe comes entirely from how the right portrays the left, not from what progressives actually say.
Favreau suggested the only remedy is for people on the left to "show up in some of those places and be out there publicly on whatever platforms we're on, letting people know that our values and principles are and that they're not violence." It's an uphill battle against a well-oiled misinformation machine, but one he sees as necessary.
Social Media as Cancer
Utah Governor Spencer Cox offered stark words in the shooting's aftermath: "Social media is a cancer on our society right now and I would encourage people to log off, turn off, touch grass, hug a family member, go out and do good in your community." Favreau, who hosts the podcast Offline specifically about the harms of digital culture, couldn't agree more.
"Social media is a cancer. Governor Cox is correct," Favreau stated flatly. He explained that social media promises connection but delivers only the illusion of it. "You are not really connecting with human beings the way that you connect with human beings in real life. But it is hard to see that which is why people keep going back to it."
Favreau acknowledged his own struggle with this dynamic. Despite hosting a show about the virtues of logging off, he remains active on social media, partly for his job but also because he's as vulnerable to its temptations as anyone else. In the days following the shooting, he found himself online wanting to see what others were saying, seeking that sense of collective processing that used to happen when families gathered around televisions during national tragedies.
The Algorithm's Destructive Design
The fundamental problem, Favreau explained, is that people on social media are already more partisan and ideological than the general population. Then the algorithm amplifies the most extreme views on all sides while exposing users to graphic violence and dehumanizing content.
"If you are yelling at someone online, if you are arguing with someone online and you are not seeing their face, you don't know who they are, you're not sitting across the table from them like you and I are right now, then it is easier to not see them as a full person and a full human being," Favreau explained.
This dehumanization has particularly severe consequences for young people whose entire social world exists online. "If you're home all day and your community and you think you have friends, but your community is people who you do not see in person and who are only online in terms of their media accounts and you're interacting with them that way," you won't develop an accurate understanding of humanity's full range, both good and bad. "It hurts our souls. I really do," Favreau said.
A Growing Backlash
Despite the grim picture, Favreau sees reasons for hope. A genuine backlash against social media has been building, visible in polling data showing majority support for banning phones in schools—including among young people themselves. When researchers talk to students, even those who want to keep their phones acknowledge they'd prefer if everyone gave them up together. They understand the harm but feel they can't unilaterally disarm.
Favreau predicted that a candidate running in 2028 on a platform opposing social media's stranglehold on society could do remarkably well. "It's an issue that you have some people maybe on the center right who also feel the same way," creating potential for rare cross-partisan agreement.
He also noted emerging campaign strategies that prioritize in-person organizing over direct-to-camera social media content, suggesting a return to grassroots relationship-building with voters. "If we're going to get out of this, it'll be in person and not necessarily just like knocking on strangers' doors, but holding meetings of like-minded people and talking about politics."
What We've Lost
The conversation concluded with a reflection on what previous generations had that today's young people have lost. One participant recalled graduating college in 2011, just as smartphones were emerging, and initially feeling jealous of younger students who would have constant connectivity. But over time, that jealousy transformed into gratitude.
"What a blessing it was that everything we did, not just the stupid that I did in my frat house, but just that everything that we did was not broadcast to the entire world and that we got to have real intimate experiences with other human beings without feeling like you're performing for the whole world. And nobody will ever have that again."
Favreau shared his own college memories of scattering after parties and then reconvening at the dining hall the next morning to share stories. "It was the best time because it was like, let's talk about last night, let's talk about what happened, where'd you go, where'd you end up, how'd this happen, what's going on tonight. And it was just like a place where you could have a real conversation with people."
He recounted a story from Vivek Murthy, the Surgeon General under both Obama and Biden, about visiting schools and watching students sit together at lunch, all staring down at their phones in silence. It's a powerful image of connection lost.
While acknowledging the irony of two people whose livelihoods depend on online media advocating for logging off, both hoped their conversation might encourage viewers to put down their phones and reconnect with the physical world and the people in it.
Video Transcript
I'm joined now by the host of Potsy
America, John Favro. Favs, thanks for
joining me.
>> Always a pleasure.
>> So, we are right now in the aftermath of
the shooting by Charlie Kirk. As of this
morning, they have uh found uh uh the
suspect, the person responsible for the
shooting. Um prior to that though, prior
to that update, there was a slew of
right-wing commentators, right-wing
officials, uh Republicans who had come
out and said stuff like this.
>> The Democrats just killed Charlie Kirk
today. They're desperate. They're
losing. They want to intimidate you and
me and everybody else. Charlie Kirk's a
casualty of war. We're the we're we're
in this country.
>> When is the Democrats going to stand up
and and apologize for the hatred and the
lies that they have fed their base
that's led to these actions.
>> They are at war with us. Whether we want
to accept it or not, they are at war
with us. Now, as of this moment, there
is, you know, there are some indications
of what we know about the shooter. Um,
has two Republican parents. Uh,
steeped in online culture. I think like
the one thing above all else is that
this guy is just terminally online, as
is the case with a lot of these shooters
that we see. There isn't some cogent
political ideology in in a lot of these
cases. It's just somebody who is
up enough to be able to do this in the
first place, right? And yet that hasn't
stopped, I think, a lot of what what
we're seeing from, you know, these
figures, which is to kind of use an
already violent moment to to further
inflame tensions. Uh we saw the same
thing from Trump himself, who came came
out uh in in a in a record a recorded
address and basically said that we're at
war uh uh with with leftism, right? So,
how are you thinking about um how are
you thinking about like what the the
practical impacts of of that kind of uh
that kind of rhetoric are going to be?
>> I mean, I certainly don't think it's
going to turn the temperature down or
lead us to a better place in any way.
>> I mean, you know, I think uh the Wall
Street Journal ran that story about like
maybe there's markings that are
>> trans ideidology. I don't even know what
the that is. Or uh or anti-fascist.
And so my takeaway is that um yesterday,
Thursday, everyone jumped to conclusions
about the shooter's motive with very
incomplete information. And now we have
a little bit more information, but it's
still incomplete. So I don't really want
to jump to the shooters motives either.
We're like because they caught him alive
and he's got a family and apparently and
I believe they said he's talked to his
family about some of this stuff. So it
sounds like we're going to find out.
Yeah. But I do think like whether the
shooter was a left-wing guy, a
right-wing guy, someone with, and I said
this on the pod yesterday, someone with
complicated, weird ideological beliefs
that could be conflicting. Um, what
matters is that this, for all we know,
one person pulled the trigger here. Um,
and to Jesse Waters and Donald Trump and
all those people that we just saw saying
the Democrats are at war and Democrats
hate it, we're not at war. We don't we
want you to lose in the next election.
>> Yeah.
>> Um I I don't like what you say. I think
it's uh it's insightful. I think that uh
Donald Trump is um an authoritarian who
is trying to consolidate power right
now. But I think that we uh approach
that with nonviolence opposition,
nonviolent opposition. And I believe
strongly in that. So I and the reason I
just bring that up because it sounds
kind of obvious is like I do think the
best way to contrast with that is to
show everyone in this country we're not
the people looking for war. We are not
the people we are not in in this country
who um want violence. We don't. And if
you want to keep making up this fantasy
that there is this war in this country,
that the left is hateful and wants to
tear people down and and and ruin this
country, like you can do that, but
that's not what we stand for. Is there
some concern though given like how
bifurcated our media ecosystems are that
>> if you're watching Fox News, if you're
consuming, you know, like Donald Trump's
addresses where he's saying this, Megan
Kelly saying the same thing, Jesse
Waters saying the same thing, these
Republican lawmakers saying the same
thing, uh that that still the takeaway
for a lot of the people consuming all of
this content is going to be the polar
opposite of what you just said.
>> Yes. Yeah. I have a lot of concern about
that and I don't know what to do about
that.
>> Yeah. Because I mean it's it's like this
it's it's this massive asymmetry here
where where one side is saying that the
other side is is advocating for
something but the problem is that those
people are not consuming the other
side's views and commentary and and and
beliefs and so it's they are they their
takeaway is just that is is only based
on basically how the right paints the
left and not what the left is actually
saying.
>> I Yeah. And that obviously that's a this
is a a magnified example of this, but
like this has been our concern forever
with the right-wing media ecosystem. I
do think the only thing we can do is
show up in some of those places and be
out there publicly on whatever platforms
we're on.
>> Yeah.
>> Letting people know that um what our
values and principles are and that
they're not violence. I wanted to throw
to a clip of what Trump said in the
aftermath of of being asked about uh
about Charlie Kirk and how he's holding
up.
[Music]
>> How are you holding up over the last
three and a half years?
>> I think very good. And by the way, right
there you see all the trucks. They've
just started construction of the new
ballroom for the White House, which is
something they've been trying to get, as
you know, for about 150 years. And it's
going to be a beauty. It'll be
absolutely magnificent structure and I
just see all the trucks we just started
so it'll get done uh very nicely and
it'll be one of the best anywhere in the
world actually
>> look we all we all grieve differently
>> you know um
Obama in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook
shooting I think o Obama had a reaction
that I think uh spoke to the vast
majority of this country virtually all
of the country and then you have this
reaction uh from Trump in the aftermath
of of Charlie Kirk shooting. I'm just
curious, you know, having written for
for Obama, how like
I can't even ask you to get into Trump's
head because that is a it like the the
level of sociopathy and and malignant
narcissism that you have to be capable
of displaying to be asked about somebody
who you purportedly care a lot about and
to respond with how great the
construction of your ballroom is going
is is like, you know, next level. But
just curious, you know, having having
worked with Obama, hearing that response
to to a a horrific, tragic uh uh
shooting like like the one we saw in
Sandy Hook to today, you know, a decade
and a half later, Trump's response. I'm
just just your general reaction.
>> I know everyone thinks that everything
in politics is like planned for public
consumption and um just on the Obama
thing, obviously the nation saw him uh
tear up. Yeah.
>> But um when I when it first happened and
um I brought him the initial statement
that he did, not the speech at the at
the eulogy, but I quickly rushed out a
statement and I brought it up. I I sent
it up to him and then he called me up to
the oval so he could give me his edits
and it was the first time I saw him. It
was just me and him. And when he um
handed me the edits, like he couldn't
even look up from the desk uh because he
was, you know, it was very emotional.
And so when that showed in public,
that's just who he is, you know. And
sometimes you don't control the things
that the public sees uh when you're a
politician, as much as either you might
like or your adviserss might like or
whatever, that's just something that
happens. I say this because for for
Trump, Trump could have had a a very
close relationship with Charlie Kirk and
cared about him very much. Um, it could
be that Trump Trump doesn't really have
that Trump is sociopathic and you know,
plenty of evidence of that. And um, it
also could be I was thinking that like
he knows you're never ever supposed to
show any kind of weakness or
vulnerability or emotion because
everything is about strength with him.
And so maybe he was like, I'm just going
to start talking about that. Or maybe he
just was really cared about that because
his brain bounces around as fast as the
social media feeds that are all
uh that are ruining our lives.
>> So, exactly. It's hard to get in his
head. Yeah.
>> Couple options I gave you for what what
it could be.
>> So, I I wanted to talk to you especially
because you know you you host uh you
host a show offline um that I think is
really important especially in moments
like this and a big part of of the
shooting that we saw has been social
media's reaction to it. Um I I I took
all day Wednesday and all day Thursday
and didn't post anything because I I
felt like I had reached the breaking
point in the broader discourse. Um, and
you know, like I have to also kind of to
a degree take care of my mental health
and and not kind of uh get consumed by a
really a really uh I don't know uh
just generally disgusting and and uh and
and hostile and acrimonious news cycle.
Um, I I want to uh I want to put on the
screen here uh the Utah Governor Spencer
Cox offering a few words and then talk
to you about uh kind of a little bit of
what you've you've um spoken about on
offline. We are not wired as human
beings
biologically
uh historically we have not evolved uh
in a way that um we are capable of
processing those types of violent
imagery. And by the way, we've seen
another one with a gruesome stabbing
very recently that went viral. Um this
is not good for us. It is not good to
consume. Um, social media is a cancer on
our society right now and I would
encourage again I would encourage people
to log off, turn off, touch grass, hug a
family member, go out and do good in
your community. So um, so I'm joined by
social media is John Favro.
>> It's um,
>> how are you thinking about this? Because
you are as as online as anybody can be.
Um, but you also host a show called
Offline about the virtues of doing
exactly what the Utah governor said,
which is to to take time um, you know,
to touch grass and and and actually
surround yourself with regular human
beings. And I remember about a year ago,
I had asked you um, maybe maybe even
longer than that. I had asked you if any
if anything that you'd heard while doing
offline, if any guest you'd spoken to
while doing offline, if if there was any
evidence to point to the fact that that
um that it was beneficial to your
health, to your health, um or whatever
it may be that there was any virtue to
being to to being online even more. And
the answer was no. like nobody that
you'd spoken with said that being on the
more that you're on like that there is
in any way uh uh a positive relationship
between being online and like having any
semblance of mental health. Um, but I'm
curious in in given the response that
we've seen from from this shooting,
which is for a lot of people to just
kind of uh devolve further into their
into their corners and uh and and use it
basically to to um uh to defend their
their, you know, their prior beliefs or
or or whatever it may be. How how you're
thinking about uh you know, just the
broader state of social media.
>> Social media is a cancer. Uh Governor
Cox is correct. It it uh promises the um
ill it promises connection. It gives you
the illusion of connection.
Um you are not really connecting with
human beings the way that you connect
with human beings in real life. But it
is hard to see that which is why people
keep going back to it. So it is also the
temptation of connection for example and
I think part of this is the way that the
media in environment has broken down. I
mean I was in a family where if there
were big events something happened in
the country like there was some almost
solace in gathering around the
television together and knowing that the
whole country was watching whether it's
an election whether it was a tragedy
whether it was whatever it may be that
the whole country was watching that too
and you sort of felt this connection
there and I think that's an important
sort of human need and human impulse and
I think I mean for me I am still on
social media despite hosting the show
and everyone you know I know a lot of
our subscribers are like oh his brain's
broken what does he do he's he's like a
hypocrite he talks about it and he
doesn't get off but it's like I first of
all I am fallible I'm just I am as um uh
vulnerable to these temptations as
anyone else I also do it for my job but
I do think in like I've been online the
last couple days and I've been you know
not posting too much but I've been
online and the reason is this was a sort
of a scary thing that happened, a
tragedy and I wanted to be I wanted to
see what other people were saying and I
wanted to be around other people who
were also dealing with it. So that's why
people go on. The challenge is the
algorithms will show you first of all
it's a self- selecting population,
right? So the people who are on social
media are already more partisan and more
ideological than the rest of the
country,
>> right? And then once you're on, it's not
like you're all just in a room talking
to each other. It's that the algorithm
is showing you the most extreme uh views
on either side. And it's also showing
you like uh Governor Cox was saying,
violence, incredible violence, like the
video of Charlie Kirk. And to the point
where it desensitizes you to violence,
it also dehumanizes people. If you are
yelling at someone online, if you are
arguing with someone online and you are
not seeing their face, you don't know
who they are, you're not sitting across
the table from them like you and I are
right now, then it is easier to not see
them as a full person and a full human
being. And I think whether it's whether
this is the case for this killer or
plenty of other uh troubled killers,
sorry, plenty of other troubled young
people who either go on to be mass
shooters or just go on to have all kinds
of mental health challenges. If you're
home all day and your community and you
think you have friends, but your
community is people who you do not see
in person and who are only online in
terms of, you know, their media accounts
and you're interacting with them that
way. If that's all, you are not going to
have an accurate portrayal of what
humanity is, the good that can come from
humanity and not just the bad. And
that's going to I think it it it hurts
our souls. I really do. I I think and I
so I it's tough because I do think that
we need places to meet people and
interact with people that we may not
meet in person, you know, and I do think
we need places to find good information,
especially information that's that's
breaking quickly, right? I mean, for us,
we do this for a job,
>> but the commentary, the fights, all that
kind of it's just um it's it's a
cancer.
>> Yeah. I mean, I I I was looking at all
of this stuff and I was seeing the way
that things were going very quickly and
just kind of like stepped back and I was
like there there it kind of just feels
like we're through the looking glass,
you know, like it feels like like this
is like
>> I don't know because because it can
always it can always get worse,
>> but like watching the ways in which all
of the commentary was just it was so
hostile, so acrimonious and um and I
just I I I don't know how you come back
from a point where where there is no
humanity left in in any of this. And so
other than just stepping away, which of
course if you have like some nuanced if
you have some nuanced perspective on
this, you know, I think I think the way
like all of the incentive all of the
incentives for posting online are are
completely antithetical to that. But but
um really the only stuff that's going to
bubble to the top is the you know is the
most uh the most hostile takes and the
most partisan takes. And so I like isn't
there some concern that like that you
don't like how do you come back from
this in a world where where anybody with
nu like a nuance take is going to be
either so disgusted with what's going on
that they're not going to want to you
know weigh in or that even if they do
weigh in it's not going to bubble up in
the algorithm because that's not what
works online. And so this is like now
the new normal which is like if if you 5
years ago if you looked at a response to
a shooting if you looked today you'd be
like holy I mean this is just it's a
deeply broken it's a deeply broken
society. Um and so like I guess my worry
here is that is that this is the best
it's going to be like it like it can
only devolve even further from from here
because it's not like the incentives are
going to be any better. It's not like
Elon Musk is going to suddenly say like,
"Hey, let's uh let's start rewarding
nuance and let's start like, you know,
burying uh burying the most hostile
takes that you can get."
>> I do think that a backlash to social
media has been brewing now, like a real
one, not just, you know, people who come
on offline and talk about it. Um, you
can see it in the polls. You can see it
in polls of people who support uh
banning phones in schools. Yeah. And
including a majority of young people, by
the way. Is that true? Young people
young people are in favor of of like for
themselves.
>> It's obviously Yeah, it's obviously
closer. In fact, when you actually talk
to young people, they've done a few
studies of this.
>> Even the ones who think that they want
to keep the phones, they say, "Oh, if
everyone else gave up the phone, I'd be
great. I don't want it, but I just want
it because I I can't not have
unilaterally disarm,
>> right?" Which I I understand that that
point of view for sure. Um,
>> and so people people don't want this. I
think that in I was just saying this to
on a on a group chat much better than on
social media. Um a candidate who runs in
2028 against social media and against
the phones. Um and I'm saying phone
rest. I'm not saying ban the phones
completely like some people think I do.
Uh but a a a candidate who runs on that.
>> Too late. It's too late.
>> It's too late. the sound's going to
>> a candidate who runs on that I think
would do really well because I also
think it's an issue that um you have
some people maybe on the in the center
center right who also feel the same way
about that people don't want this and I
think even campaigning in politics I
mean
>> Zoran Mandani and his uh social media
strategy is very interesting right which
is instead of uh direct to camera stuff
that he's doing so it's just like a
relationship with the voter
>> he's doing grassroots in-person
organizing and meeting people and then
broadcasting that to people, which is
different, right? Because that it I
think campaigns are going to return to
to the point that they can. Uh if we're
going to get out of this, well, it'll be
in person and and and not necessarily
just like knocking on strangers doors,
but holding meetings of like-minded
people and talking about politics. Like,
I just think we have to mediate some of
our conversations in person. And I say
that knowing that I will go back online
and have fights because that is what we
have right now. But I know that I am
always looking for ways to meet in
person and have debates about politics
that way.
>> You know, right when I was graduating
from college, when I was graduating from
Lehi, I remember I remember so like
smartphones were just coming out. This
was in 2011. I think I had like one one
of my buddies was the first one to get
like an Android. Uh I I had a flip phone
in college. Like it feels it feels so
prehistoric now, but like I had flip
phone in college and I remember being so
jealous. I remember like on on
graduation day watching, you know, I was
there and I I saw I saw like you some of
the um uh you know people getting ready
to leave and and some of the you know
siblings of of graduates coming and
they're like I'm going to I'm going to
be here and I was like man I'm so
jealous because these kids are going to
have such a different college career
because they're so much more connected
than we were and they'll have the
internet and they'll be they'll have
like Instagram and social media and they
can they can talk to each other and like
we missed out on all of that and and for
years that that was how I thought about
This was I was so jealous because these
kids are going to be so much more so
much better connected to the world and
to even people like on our own campus.
And recently I started thinking what
what a blessing it was that
everything we did,
>> not just the stupid that I did in
my frat house, but like just that
everything that we did was not broadcast
to the entire world and that we got to
have like real like intimate experiences
with other human beings without feeling
like you're performing for the whole
world. And uh and and nobody will ever
have that again.
>> I know. I always think I didn't
>> I mean it's it's like a little bit like
you know when we were growing up and
like the way you found people in your
neighborhood in the '90s was like look
for the bikes, right? Like look for
people's bikes in their front yards.
>> It's that and also I was thinking about
this in college cuz I I had a flip phone
like maybe the last year in college.
which I didn't even cuz I'm you know I'm
old and um but you'd go out at night
you'd go to parties everyone after all
your friends at the party after the
party would scatter in different
directions and then every every morning
Saturday or Sunday morning we'd meet in
the dining hall and everyone would share
their stories.
>> Yeah. And because you weren't texting
each other, you weren't posting it. And
so there's like a table of all your
close friends and and it was the best
time because it was like, let's talk
about last night, let's talk about what
happened, where'd you go, where'd you
end up, how' this happen, what's going
on tonight. And it was just like a place
where you could have a real conversation
with people. And I do I like I feel so
sorry for kids today that they don't get
to have that. And when I talked to uh
Vic Murthy, the surgeon general, he he
talks about how he or Biden's surgeon
general and Obama's as well, he talked
about how he go into schools and sit for
lunch with kids at schools and they
would all just be down looking down on
their phones the whole time.
>> Yeah. Well, look, I I think uh you know,
it's a little weird for for like two
people who work online and whose
livelihood comes from from being online
to talk about like the virtues of not
being online, but I hope that like you
know, the last the events of the last
few days can at least uh you know, offer
offer folks who are watching a little
bit of of a push to put down the phones,
stop stop watching folks, including us,
and uh and just, you know, spend some
time uh you know, reconnecting with with
people in the world here. So, uh, Favs,
as always, I appreciate the time. Uh,
thanks so much.
>> Thanks for having me.