Charlie Kirk's Best Friend EXPOSED, More Suspicious Updates!

[Music] [Music] Hello everyone. I feel like I I ain't been live in like two or three days, so feels like forever. What's up everybody? Give me ones in the chat if you can hear me, if you don't mind. Ones in the chat. Hit the like button on your way in. Heck yeah. Hopefully I can still I still not do this. All right, bet. I got ones in the chat. Hit the like button. Thank you. Thank you. Hey, I'm going to go ahead and say this at the very beginning. I am extremely um proud to announce that a documentary that I have been working on for the past three weeks is officially done. I'm going to repeat this later in the live for those who join a little bit later. But everybody, I want you to know that this documentary that I just finished, um, in my estimation, um, I I I I believe that it's it's the greatest work that I've ever done before. I know that's a very uh bold thing to say, but and it's it's going to be it's going to be uh subjective, but for those of you that are on Patreon, I want you to know that the extended and the uncensored version will be uploaded tonight. In fact, it'll be it should be ready sometime around 8:30. So about 2 hours from now uh you will have access to the video the extended and the uncensored version of this video. Um, the second thing I want to say is the uh the heavily censored and edited version uh for YouTube will will hit tomorrow at 300 p.m. Again, I'll repeat all of this maybe 30 40 minutes into the live. But um this this documentary made my brain hurt. I'm not joking. It it it it really stressed me out, but I guess in a good way because I really went down the rabbit hole. I connected a lot of dots, a lot of relationships, and I've never done it like this before on this channel. So, I know I'm ranting right now, but I want y'all to know if you're on Patreon, link is in the description to my Patreon, but it but if you're on Patreon, be on the lookout for that sometime around 8:30. The documentary is about an hour long. It's part one. I do plan to make a part two um probably in a in another month or so because it took a very long time to to to finish this one. But you're going to enjoy the video. If I don't look tired to y'all, I'll never look tired. So, there is that. Uh but again, let's let's go and hop let's hop into this. Somebody told me other than in the comment section, they said uh that they have Charlie Kirk fatigue. The last 15 of my last maybe 20 videos have been about Charlie Kirk. But I think all of this has been by design. That's my personal opinion. Uh but we're going to talk about some updates, some crazy updates that's come out over the past couple of days and it's a lot going on. And as always, we're going to talk about it together. As a reminder, hit the like button. Um and I do have a guest that's going to be on here with me. He's been on here before. [Laughter] They say they have fatigued. Charlie Kirk fatigue. That's funny. I get it. I get it. But but some of this stuff is interesting. And And Charlie Kirk's good friend Andrew Co uh embarrassed himself yesterday. I don't know if you all heard about it. So before I bring the guest on, I'm just going to say this. I'm going to let you all know what we're going to talk about. We're going to talk about some Charlie Kirk updates. We're gonna cover Andrew Kovit embarrassing himself and getting exposed yesterday and it's went viral. It's all over the place and I really want to talk about that. We're going to cover something that happened with Charlie Kirk at one of his debates that I guarantee you a lot of you all have never seen before. So, I want I want to talk about that. And then I also want to I'm leaving something out. Jasmine Crockett. A lot of you all may or may not know who Jasmine Crockett is. Uh she's a member of Congress. Uh she represents the state of Texas and I want to talk about uh a viral beef that's going on right now between her and Stephen A. Smith and I want to give my opinions on that topic. All right. So, let me go ahead and bring Kelvin on. Kelvin, >> what up? What up? >> What's up, bro? >> What's up, man? Good to see you. Good to see you. >> Good to see you as well, man. Uh it's been what a a couple of weeks since since you were last on. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's been a couple of weeks since I was last on. Yeah. Had a good time. >> Yeah. For sure. For sure. I know I know uh you you have I think a couple of of different opinions than I do as it pertains to this Charlie Kirk situation. But we're going to discuss it here for everybody to see. >> Um and let's see here. Let me see if I got all of this >> up to the peoples. Everybody, do do y'all remember Kelvin from a couple of weeks ago? Let's see here. Okay. All right. So, the first thing I want to talk about, >> yeah, >> is is is the is the revelation coming out about um the Google searches. I don't know if you all have heard about this, but >> I I I briefly referenced this in a couple of lives um actually earlier this week, but there were some Google searches um coming out of that one foreign country, but also coming out of Washington DC of several people u there was Google searches of um Charlie Kirk. There were Google searches of the hospital that he was allegedly taken to. There were Google searches of um >> you said what? >> The surgeons >> of the surgeons. >> There was Google search Google searches of all of this stuff and it just made no sense like the day before. >> So Kelvin and I are going to react to this together, but we're going to first uh play the clip from the Jimmy Door show. >> Awesome. So let me pull that up now and we'll get into this, man. >> Yeah. Looking forward to it. All right, let's do it. All right. >> All surgeons at this regional hospital that nobody ever heard of. That's the one they inexplicably took Charlie Kirk to. Instead of taking him to the closer place with a trauma center, they take him to this regional hospital. And turns out people are Google searching this regional hospital from Israel and and Washington DC. They're Google searching the medical examiner from Washington DC and Israel. And now we find out they're they're Google searching the surgeons at that regional hospital from Israel and they're all on this around the same time cluster. Well, uh I wanted to show people this. This might freak you out. Uh somebody figured out how to do these Google searches. Like so you can you can do some kind of search and you can see what people are searching for via Google searches, >> right? And so like if you put in something like Jimmy Door, it'll show you all the places in the world people are googling Jimmy Door, right? >> I remember after the election, Jimmy, everyone was searching uh painless slip and slide methods. Uh do I need to get a lawyer? Yeah. >> Remember because we thought Trump was going to do something. >> So So I found this and I was getting ready to put it on the show and then I saw James Lee also found this and I like the way he breaks it down. So, let's listen to what James Lee, friend of the show, guest host, has to say about these Google searches that are super sus. Watch this. Let me ask you a question. When was the first time you heard the name Tyler Robinson? Or, >> by the way, it's always three names, right? Tyler James Robinson. Tyler James Robinson. Lee Har Lee Harvey Oswald. >> Uh, why why is it always three names? Anyway, let's go. Let's keep going. In case there's another guy with that name so you can disambiguate. >> Is that it? >> I I I would just guess if I had to guess why, but who knows? >> I don't know. Luigi Manion was just two names, right? >> Yeah. Syllables. >> There's only one Luigi Manio. >> There's only one. >> And then you have Jack Ruby. >> What about the guy who killed uh RFK? What was his name? >> Remember? He lives in Pasadena. >> Sir, sir. Three sir hands. >> That's like siran sir hand. That's like if Chris Christie was named Christy Christie. [Laughter] >> All right, here we go. >> Or the Losi center. >> So let's let's start it again. >> Let me ask you a question. When was the first time you heard the name Tyler Robinson or the Losi Center? A mouser 98. For me, and I assume many of you, it was in the days and weeks after Charlie Kirk's tragic assassination on September 10th. And you better believe I've been doing some Googling since then, right? Who is Tyler? What are the access points to the Los Cy rooftop? What kind of damage can a 306 caliber bullet do? But what if I told you somebody, maybe multiple somebody's were searching those terms before September 10th? What do you think about that? >> Let me pause this real quick. Hold on. Hold up. Uh I I'll I'll hear what you got to say, um Kevin. But >> see, the the the first thing about this for me, cuz I saw someone in the chat say uh that VPNs apparently can be manipulated. I don't understand that. Um I I don't I don't, you know, I'm not cosplaying to be or pretend as if I'm some sort of professional. But something I will say is that why would someone be searching for these people's names before the situation even happens? >> Yeah. >> Have you seen this video before? Even if it's not from the Jimmy Dor show, are you familiar with this topic? >> I am for sure. For sure. Yeah, I definitely Yeah, I definitely seen this and it Yeah, for some Yeah, VPNs can be manipulated and from my understanding most of the VPN companies uh including NordVPN and I think it's it was AtlasVPN. There's a few of those companies, but the majority of them are are owned from that one country um in the uh >> Wait, what? Really? >> In the Middle East. Yeah. Yeah. So like there's a there's a also a podcaster named Matt Kim who's friends with Jimmy Door as well. >> Matt Kim the Asian guy. >> Yeah. >> So he has his own VPN service that he offers that's like non- enrypted. I mean it's encrypted but it's outside of uh the normal networks that VPNs generally go through. But yeah, most of the VPN companies are owned by former ID ID IDF uh soldiers. I did not know that. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> So, is it So, wait, but is it a coincidence that we're finding Well, let me ask this. Do Do you think that it's possible >> that this information is being manipulated? >> Yeah. >> I mean, by that point, by those people. >> Yeah. By those people 100%. Why would they want us to think? Why why would they want us to know if they know that we have the uh the the access to be able to see these Google searches? Why would they allow that to happen? I think honestly, well, when you're in a position of power, I think the thing is about power, it it it kind of lacks creativity to a certain degree. >> It's kind of like someone being um hubris off their ability to um manipulate and control something. And if you feel like you're chosen, it's very easy to kind of get lost in your own psyche >> that you kind of you don't mitigate the um you don't mitigate the fact that humans have uh their own intuition to be able to look into something themselves >> and there there's obviously there can be checks and balances there. You get drunk off your own power, right? >> So it's easy for them to make mistakes like this. I don't think I don't think that this is actually something they uh planned for as in with doing the Google searches. I think they they felt like it was something they were going to do and people weren't going to catch on to it. >> Yeah, the shooting. >> Well, there's somebody maybe multiple somebody's searching those terms before September 10th. What do you think about that? before the shooting. Well, there's Washington DC at 11:00 a.m. the day before the Charlie Kirk shooting. >> So, this guy figured out the day before he went back and saw from Washington DC. Someone had somebody had Google searched the guy they're claiming did the shooting, but it was the day before the shooting. Why would somebody in Washington DC Google search a guy Tyler Robinson nobody ever heard of from Washington DC? >> Wait, just one person or a lot of searches? >> No. No, just one search. >> Okay. >> And you'll see here where the news finally broke that it was in fact Tyler James Robinson. But notice that that's weird. That's weird. >> That is weird. I got to say somebody. Why would anybody be searching the name Tyler James Robinson one day before he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk? The data point is just a tiny blip, but it's there. Tyler James Robinson, right? A name that nobody knew of prior to September 12th, 2 days after the shooting, when the media told us who Tyler James Robinson was, right? A supposed 22-year-old leftist who hated Charlie Kirk. So, what does that little Google Trend blip mean? Well, I did some research using Google Gemini and they say Google Trends, what it does is normalize search interest to the region you select. The formula is search interest equals total searches in the region and time divided by total searches for the term. So, when you look at things from a nationwide context, the total number of searches is enormous. the small handful of searches for Tyler James Robinson on September 9th is so tiny, a fraction of all the US searches that it gets rounded down to zero. But then when you zoom in in a DC context, if you filter for the D uh District of Colombia, the total search volume is much much smaller. So, if a few searches for Tyler James Robinson on September 9th originated in the DC area, then this handful of searches becomes a significant enough proportion of all DC searches on that day to register a value of 18 out of 100. Then it says, and this part is critical, quote, "The fact that the searches are localized to DC, a city synonymous with the federal government, intelligence, national media, and political organizations, strongly shifts the interpretation away from random noise or perpetrator checking his own name from an ambiguous anomaly into a strong potential signal of pre-event institutional knowledge or activity." Hm, that is >> interesting. And to be clear, I'm not coming to any conclusions myself just yet, but that is how Google is interpreting its own trends data. But hold up for a second. Strap in, buckle up, whatever you need to do because there is actually so much more weirdness. So, we're we don't have to react to the entire clip, but essentially uh what what they're going to discuss in that clip, everybody further in that clip is in so many words, they're they're going to also find like Kelvin was saying earlier that uh they also found that within Google searches, they looked up the hospital that Charlie Kirk was allegedly taken to. And for those of you who don't know, this hospital was not the closest hospital uh to the campus. and it also did not have a trauma center from my understanding. So why did they allegedly take him to this hospital? Uh the second thing is they looked up the the the medical examiner um who has only been in their role I believe for less than a year or or a little bit over a year. And that person is um I still haven't figured out the the the best way to say this. They are J E W I S H and uh they're recently divorced. This woman was recently divorced from a husband of the same ethnicity. >> And so people are connecting a lot of dots that where what are the chances that all of this would be looked up? And before I pass it over to Kelvin, I I'll just say this. I'm more so leaning into the possibility >> that this is intentional. And what I mean is I I I hear what you're saying and I agree with you that I think being wealthy and powerful, there's almost a little bit of >> almost sloppiness that comes with it. There are certain things that you you don't think about, some some things you don't consider. But I I personally, as I've had time to think about this, everybody, this Charlie Kirk situation has been so sloppy that it's almost it almost seems intentional to me. >> It almost seems intentional to me, which only helps further my belief that I don't believe that he was ever powpowed. Um, but that's that's my belief. What are your thoughts? >> I digress. I was waiting to say that. Right. >> But um yeah, no, my thoughts on on the situation is well for people that practice um or believe in Satanism. >> Yeah. >> Am I allowed to? I don't know if I'm allowed to. >> Yeah. So, for anyone that practice Satanism, it's part of their their belief. They believe in uh they believe in karmic retribution. And part of karmic retribution is is that they have to openly tell you what they're what they're going to do so they don't get any sort of karmic reaction back to them. So I I believe certain aspects of this of this situation with Charlie Kirk. I believe some of this is set up intentionally like the hats, you know, everyone knows about the hats that that were on the table. >> Yeah. The 47 47 47 which 33. >> Yeah. 33, >> which is a really big number in Freemasonry. >> Yeah. Um the announcements, you know, where um the um I guess I was the governor of of uh of Utah, the guy I was talking with, um Cash Patel, and they said, "Well, 33 hours." >> Oh, governor. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. Cash Patel 33 hours. So there's certain things that they put out there that's it's coded, but it is some sort of admission of something, but I as far as the Google searches goes, I don't I don't I personally I don't feel like they planned on that. I think that was something that they were just hoping they would just do it and no one would ever geot track it and try to figure out where it came from. >> That's right. It's kind of it's kind of like when uh Trump um had that uh assassination attempt thing >> here thing >> and there was Google searches they started geot tracking some Google searches using cell phone data and they found out that there were some cell phones that were being pinged near uh Washington DC near the uh FBI headquarters if I'm not mistaken. >> Yeah, >> I remember they they were they went into things about that. So perhaps they should have been a little bit more careful to not I mean to understand maybe the general public could look up something but I what I think honestly was a distraction was this this whole sniper on the roof thing. I think that whole thing for me that seemed like that was a scop. >> But a scop for what though? >> A distraction from what though? from the actual proximity of the shooting >> where where it actually happened at >> where the shooting took place and because Americans are so gungho and gun crazy, they know that they would get people going, "Oh, I'm a gun expert." And so everyone's just doing their own videos and being like, "Wait, I saw like a little smidge of a guy moving right >> on the camera." >> So, I believe all of that. For me personally, I feel like that was a scop. >> So, here's the thing. All right, but before we go to this next clip, I I do want to go ahead and address something that I know Kelvin feels differently on. >> So, I don't believe that Charlie Kirk was actually powpowed that day. >> Um, I have multiple reasons to believe it. One of the biggest reasons is the the the photo, and let me see if I can pull it up uh up here. Let's see. Charlie Kirk bodyguards uh table. Um so the the picture that I'm definitely not going to be able to find on the spot right now. >> Oh say show >> but but the picture of the security guards I mean the the the security team. >> Yeah. when they're under the table. When they're under the table supposedly helping Charlie Kirk, >> here's the bottom. Here's the biggest thing that I think most people are overlooking and you're going to have an incredibly hard time justifying this because sometimes the smallest details can tell us all we need to know. How come when the the security team was under the ta was was was kneelled, you know, behind the table supposedly trying to help Charlie Kurt, what's the one thing you never notice? What's the one thing that no one is doing that entire time? No one is speaking. So, let me make sure I understand this. You just witnessed someone get powpowed, >> which is a complete shock, right? It should have caught everybody off guard. No one should have known this was going to happen. Everyone should be in a state of shock. If you're the security team, maybe you're not as shocked because you're in this type of business. So maybe you just get to work. At the very least, you should be like this. I'll grab this. You go get this. I'm I I'll do this. Pass me that. here, let's do this. Not a single one of them are speaking. Everyone's solid. They're handing stuff off. They're pointing. Nobody's talking. Now, Kelvin, you could easily say, >> well, yeah, that could mean at the very most negligence on the security team, but that does not necessarily implicate Charlie Kirk. This is my response to you. >> Okay. I think it does when you pair that in conjunction with the fact that we still don't see any red liquid leaking anywhere >> anywhere. We we covered in my last live, I believe it was my last live, >> yeah, >> I interviewed someone in my last live, but the last live about Charlie Kirk, we covered the guy that was basically debunking my claim. He found some people that had some red liquid on them. However, I've seen um another guy come back and react to that video uh who is actually the same guy who made the original statement who's also ex military green beret or whatever. M he actually followed up and reacted to that and said that one that's not enough red liquid in his opinion if he was actually working on Charlie Kirk at the he said his opinion the amount of red liquid that he saw in the guy's body would be consistent with carrying Charlie Kirk to the car he said but we still never see any red liquid leaking on the concrete or anywhere at any point in time. M. >> So, I'm curious to to to to hear what you have to say or what your thoughts are with the fact that none of them are speaking to each other, bro. Everyone's solid. It's like everyone knew what to do. >> Nobody's talking. >> Man, my thoughts on it. Honestly, I feel like the security team I feel like there were I feel like the security team was in on it on the situation that was taking place. And I felt like once they saw him on the ground, they were just kind of like Well, that's job done. You know, I don't I could see >> What do you think they were doing behind the table, though? >> I don't know. I I I don't know if I could see anyone actually like trying to um plug up his wound because you if you have an exit wound, generally they'll try to they'll try to plug it up with something if it's cloth or something. >> But um >> here's a more specific question though, which is really what I'm trying to get at here. >> Yeah. If you think they were in on it, >> we can clearly see their arms moving. They're doing something. Let's say that they're pretending like they're helping him. Here's the problem. >> Yeah. >> Shouldn't they have something on their hands? They have nothing on their hands. So, what are they touching? >> I don't know. It depends on who is doing what? I I have no I have no idea to be honest. I I you know, unless we can have x-ray vision to see under like past that table, right? There's no indication of what exactly it was that they're doing, but the facial expressions was what was bothering me the most. Especially the the guy with the sunglasses that everyone kind of suspects he kind of had this arm ching thing going on. >> Yeah. >> He just had this >> grin and smile on his face with sunglasses on. >> I think a natural reaction to something like that if it's your first time seeing obviously they're trained security, but no one's anticipating for an assassination attempt. Like nobody. No one's like being like, "Oh yeah, people get shot every day, so we're just kind of like we're just ready for it, >> right?" >> I think if it was a genuine situation, sunglasses would have got removed. >> It would have been a real scramble for detail trying to figure out what was going on. And that look it looked like a coordinated like, >> "Yeah, but here but here's the >> jump tables, pass some stuff." And >> I'm with you. You and I agree that that we both believe that that they were complicit allegedly. Here's the problem though. This is where because I know we still differ with the Charlie Kurt what role he played. Watch this. If the security team is complicit, Kelvin, by default, you have to say that all the other people and their weird behavior is also complicit. Would you agree? The person asking the question, I think you Yeah, because you sent this to me. >> Hunter Kak. Yeah. >> Hunter Kak. What are the chances of that? You you think that was just a coincidence? The son of the person that Jimmy Kimmel works for was the person asking the question and it just so happened to be about transgender >> shooters. >> The person holding the microphone >> Yeah. >> is a guy named I believe his name is Scott. He's not a student and he's also not a Turning Point USA member. >> Wow. >> He was a volunteer for that day. We we covered this on the last live. Candace Owens also spoke about this. He wasn't a student, bro. Yeah, cuz I thought I >> Everybody's new. The medical examiner is new. The the the Utah FBI director is new. The um um um um the person uh holding the microphone was new. All these new people surrounding Charlie Kirk that day. Here's the biggest issue. If you're going to say that you believe that that the security detail was complicit, >> they weren't the only ones acting weird, bro. Also, the young people >> we've covered. I don't know if if you caught that live, >> but there's a white girl. She looked like she's probably mid20s, young 20s with a ball cap, with a MAGA hat on. As soon as Charlie Kirk was pow powed, >> she didn't she wasn't shocked. She didn't gasp. She didn't yell. She turned around and she looked like she was smirking >> and she immediately walked off. This man is falling over to the ground, you know, as as this the security detail guy is taking him over. The woman sees it, doesn't care, walks off. >> You have the the African-American looking girl that was behind the the the scene recording in the opposite direction. She's not yelling. She's not screaming. She's not trying to protect herself. She's not looking for other people. The guy who took the security camera, he left the the scene and went in and and posted up on the hillside by the lever and started. >> Oh, yeah. I saw that. Yeah, I saw that guy. So if you believe the security detail was complicit based on their odd behavior, >> would you also also say that those young people were complicit too? >> 100%. >> So >> because the thing the the thing is is I did research on Hunter Kak and I found out Hunter Kak, the guy who asked Charlie the last question. >> Yep. >> He's tied to another organization called Unfuck America. >> Oh yeah, that's right. uh Destiny's organization, right? >> Yeah. And there was some footage of him talking about Charlie Kirk, the the guy who asked the question in a very unflattering very unflattering way. Um I sent the clip over to you. I don't know if it's YouTube safe. I think it is from from what I saw. It's YouTube. >> Where did you send it? Was it on Instagram? >> Instagram. But um but Hunter Kak is um work he works for Unfuck USA and Unfuck USA is an organization run by the YouTube streamer Destiny. I don't know if the audience has heard of Destiny. Uh he's kind of known in the gamer space. Um, but Unfuck America was uh a company that was set up as a alternative to um Charlie Kirk's um uh touring company. Um something America um forgot the name of the the tour that >> Charlie wasn't America first. >> No, it was um it was the the Bringing America Back tour or something. >> Okay, gotcha. >> Yeah. Charlie Kirk's logo for at where the shooting took place. The logos that are all over the canopies. That's the name of Charlie Kirk's company. And they have a al alternative company called um Unfuck America. Same logo style, same design, but long story short, this kid uh is talking about Charlie in a very unflattering manner. And the reason why that organ organization was uh founded was because they felt like Charlie Kirk's message going around the college campuses was a bad message to be sending out there. They're a liberal left left far-left leaning organization and it was founded by a uh lady who is from the uh the place in the Middle East. She's from that community. Um yeah, her her Yeah, it's in the video. It's in the video clip that I I sent you, >> right? >> I don't Yeah, I don't know if it's you're able to to check it, but yeah, but um >> Yeah. So, >> yeah. So there's some some correlations between that and there was a member in the audience that I saw at Charlie Kirk's as he Charlie Kirk is walking out to the crowd and a member in the audience is also me a member of Unfuck America. Excuse my language, but this is the name of the organization. I don't know if I need to censor myself, but >> So, let me attempt to play it just directly from my phone for everybody to see >> because if I try to screen record it, >> it'll take forever. All right, here we go. >> Just pay attention to them. Some people have their phones, so obviously they're not clapping, but just keep your eye on those two people. And before anyone wants to say I'm accusing these two people of being guilty of this crime, their behavior is certainly worth the FBI calling them in for questioning. We are allowed to ask questions, especially when the narrative has too many anomalies and we see suspicious behavior or activity with our own eyes. All we want is the truth and we have a right to ask. >> So, everyone's clapping except those two. Those are like bullets named Destiny is just pay attention to them. Some people have their phone. >> Okay. Um >> their websites they have a ro >> on their websites they have a roster of their creators listed. So Z is there, Destiny is there, and this guy is there. Hunter Kak. >> Do you hate Charlie Kirk? I know I do. Charlie Kirk is currently poisoning the mind of every young American who can stand to look at his stupid face. And we're trying to do something about that. Charlie has something called the Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida on July 11th. What a coincidence. That's where I'm going to be. This is me and a whole bunch of other creators on this page are going to try to unfuck the damage that Charlie Kirk has irreparably done to the country. If you want tickets, link here. So, Charlie Kirk, bastion of free speech and the marketplace of ideas, cut off my ticket. So, um, what I'm going to be doing is infiltrating as a Trump supporter. So, I just acted confused and said, "I don't know what happened with my ticket, but I'd like to buy another one." And, uh, on their websites, they have a roster of their creat. >> So, Hunter Kak is also Yeah. F. Kak Kak is a uh Yeah. Yeah. >> But see what are you getting at though? You do you believe based on this information? What do you think that means though? >> I think that means that this company unfuck America. Um and uh there's a YouTube creator Nie uh Ni um she's a African Canadian creator, whatever. She did some research on on her end as well too. Uh which is that's part of where where I gathered it from. But she um but overall I think with the Unfuck America thing, I feel like what this is revealing is that Unfuck America was an organization that was kind of set up as um pretty much like an alternative group they could activate at any given moment if they needed something done, >> right, >> on their end. And it kind of like >> like something violent >> or just something to to to like counterprotest. >> Uh counterprotest or >> something else >> or Yeah. or enact something sinister and it kind of absolves direct liability going to that place in the Middle East because they could seed finances to that company through a third party and it's no real direct connection. So, um, but the the founder of that was Destiny and another lady named, uh, Z Cohen. I think, you know, Cohen >> kind of >> That's crazy, bro. That's crazy. That That's crazy. Um, >> yeah. >> And so, um, yeah. And so, there's one angle of the Charlie Kirk, you know, powpowing that they're not showing for some reason or no one has >> from the right side. But see, that promps another question. Has anybody >> Hey chat, has anybody thought about this? We've said it before. I'm going to say it again. There were thousands of people, hundreds of people out there. >> Where is all the camera footage? We've seen, yes, we've seen some miscellaneous videos here and there of people standing way back by the centers. We should have seen hundreds of videos from all different angles. They don't exist. Where are they? >> Yeah. >> How come the only videos we seem to get are the ones that almost feels like we're supposed to see? But I do want to address this comment right here. Jamie says, "I'm eight minutes behind." And he is saying, "No red liquid, but I saw it in HD like a water holes from his neck. You sound like Kelvin." I'm pretty sure >> that's Kelvin's position. My position is I saw it on live by accident when it first happened. I shed a tear. No one deserves that. If that actually happened, I am now entertaining the idea that there's a good chance that that may have been AI. Part of the reason I believe that, there's three good reasons. One of them is because I listened to a a a doctor, and I I covered this on Patreon. A doctor said when he saw the video, in his opinion, what he saw was not real. um red liquid. He said because that is not what it typically looks like when it is expelled from the body. He says that looks like something from a video production. He said you he said he understands why why the most people in public would believe that it's real because no one most humans have never and probably will never witness anything like that unless you're in combat. He said that's not what it actually looks like. He said the blood the the red liquid looked or appeared a bit too thick as if it had already been exposed to air before consistent with that of fake red liquid. That was his opinion, not mine. The other reason is because Candace Owens when she first covered it, >> um she said that um she she saw the camera footage from behind and she saw no red liquid. Oh, that was from that was from behind. Yeah, >> but what does that mean? Like the camera's right there. Why would you if if it's coming from the side, you're going to see something. >> It came from right here. So, it would have been gushing out and coming down like this way. So, if she if the camera angle's from behind, it's not going to see it leaking out from the >> You believe or maybe your your your view is that he got popped out from the front. I don't know anybody else that believes that, bro. I think most people believe he got popped out from the right. Well, >> and that was an exit wound that we saw, which means that the the red liquid would have dispelled that way. >> Well, there there was two two theories on Well, there was more than one theory on the shooting for sure, but there were two that for me made the most sense. And it was I actually did you see the lapel mic one? >> I saw Yep. >> If a bullet travels through his chest, it can come out from here. But they're saying it didn't come out. But that's still where the exit wound is. So if the camera's from behind and it's leaking out this way, there's no way they would they would she would catch it on camera. >> By that time, he would have rolled >> he would have rolled over and fell, >> you know, cuz he toppled over, >> right? >> Yeah. >> Okay. Okay. Well, >> now if it was directly on the side of his neck, then yeah, it would it should have been shown like spraying out or something or, you know, something of that nature. I don't know. I don't know if it actually sprays out. I know it does movies, >> right? Okay. So, look, I I I I do want to transition to this next clip. So, for those of you who don't know, um Andrew Kovit, who I have said multiple times at this point, um there's something off about the guy in my opinion. Um I >> you know, you know where he's from, right? >> No. Is he from the that foreign country? >> His business partner? Yeah. Charlie's business partner from the Bro, >> I don't believe you. >> I don't believe. >> You can, bro. You can Google that. You can Google that. Yeah. >> Hey yo, Chad. >> Hey yo, Chad. Are y'all hearing what he's saying? Andrew Co, Charlie Kirk's right-hand man is from that one foreign country. Yo, I did not know that. >> But I'm going tell you information. >> Huh? >> It's public available information. It's patterns. I I studied patterns. >> Watch this. So, for those of you who don't know, Andrew Co. See, my chat knew some of them knew. I I I didn't know that. That makes it makes it even worse. But I'm about to really blow blow you all's mind. Did you all know that Andrew Kov uh went on a debate stage yesterday? Did you know that, Kelvin? >> No, no, no, no. I actually when you mentioned it earlier I I heard you and I bro Andrew Co went on a debate stage. I don't know why you would be doing that. It's it's just bad timing if I just witnessed my friend get powpowed. I don't care about the left versus the right and no heal. I'm trying to heal. >> Yeah. It's not natural to go and like I want to handle some debates. >> It's it's not natural around TPS USA is not natural. Nobody. And whoever whoever's gonna take over for Charlie, they're gonna roast it at every debate. >> So, it's just the whole thing is the company's done. >> It gets it gets wor I I I think the company is done as well, >> but it gets worse. I'm about to I'm about to show you all a clip. >> Yeah. >> Once again, hit the like button, everybody. I'm about to show you all a clip of Andrew Kov on a debate stage, which is already the first problem, but he got owned by a 20-year-old. Watch what happens. Watch this. I've never been so like eager to show you all a video. >> He is no Charlie. That's for sure. >> He's no Charlie. Here's the clip. >> Listen. Listen up. I live in the city of Chicago. >> Oh, hold on. >> Okay, there it is. >> Can you all see that, Kelvin? Can you see that? >> Yeah, I can see it. Yeah, I can see it. Let's do it. >> Live in the Let me finish. Listen. Listen. I live in the city of Chicago. Donald Trump over the past two months has not only posted an AI video of Obama being arrested, but then after that, he posted an AI image of Chicago being invaded. After that, he sent the National Guard to Chicago. So, I have spent my formative years watching the president do this. And just think about this. We saw these Nazi group chats, which I'm sure you condemn, right? This Nazi group chat. >> Well, we can talk about it. >> Do you condemn it? >> We I want to talk about it. >> Wait, so when they said gas chambers disavow >> When they say gas chambers, you won't So, you're like JD Vance. You just won't condemn this? Well, I actually had somebody on the show today. We had a whole conversation. >> You guys can all condemn this, right? >> Oh, yes. >> Thank you. Hold on. >> All right. Can you condemn that? >> Here's here's the point. Of course, but that's easy. >> What What >> for him? You know what? This this is this is not constructive, right? >> Because what what the constructive part is not this is what look what's happening here. And I know both of you guys and I want to bring Joe in on this and I want to get to the audience, but let's just be clear about where the path is forward. university guy who runs the Republican club there and said that people came up and said they were happy that Charlie Kirk had been assassinated. >> Yeah. I believe his name was Luke. He said that a bunch of young progressives were coming up and acting in insane ways. And as a young liberal, someone who's on the left, I just want to say I wholeheartedly condemn anybody who is saying insane things about Charlie Kirk, horrendous things about Charlie Kirk. Anyone who is spitting or shutting down conversation, that is not what America is about at all. And I can I can I can very easily condemn when my side is going off the rails, but I just ask the bare minimum from Andrew when they're talking about gas chambers and group chats. Can you condemn that? >> Are we really going to do this again? No. >> So you don't condemn it? >> Your energy is so aggressive. >> I love Hitler. Gas chambers. >> Can't condemn that. >> Just easy, easy, buddy. Okay. So there is a whole conversation that I want this to be attached to. Okay. And the whole conversation is that we have a a guy who's running for attorney general in >> I condemn that, but you can't condemn your side. >> But your party is not disavowing still supports this guy. >> Name one Democrat that supports him in Congress who says I support what he said. >> Campaign just got asked on CNN tonight and said, "Yeah, I still support him." >> Supports what he said? >> No, he doesn't support what he says, but he's not pulling. >> So no Democrat supports what he said. >> You're going to parse. Okay. Well, listen. I condemn what they say, but I still support. >> Thank you. Why did I have to like like pry that out of You are you are you are parsing uh you it's basically a distinction without a difference. >> JD Vance lied on your podcast today. He said these were young. >> Whoa. Look, I don't understand why this is >> I got some journalistic questions for you guys. >> So, hold up. This is one of the wildest things I've seen in a while. So, first and foremost, dude, what why are you there? First and foremost, Stephen A. Smith was also up there. Why you up there debating people on the left versus the right paradigm? That's silliness, bro. You should be trying to heal. Second of all, you you were asked a a a straightforward question, bro, about condemning gas chambers and and Nazi group chats. He wouldn't do it. >> He's from Yeah. >> And he's from that I'm I'm so confused. I'm even more confused now that you just revealed his background. That's a major red flag. Why would he not condemn that? I I I can't call it to be honest. I I don't know why he I don't know if he's trying to hope in maintaining some sort of fan base from a >> leftwing side. I I have >> Yeah. I mean, perhaps there's a connection because of, you know, some things I just said about Unfuck America. I don't know. But I I Yeah, it's very odd and it's it's just odd for him to be at that in general, that uh that little debate. And with News Nation, they're they're for me, they're kind of suspicious. >> News Nation, I I think I think um >> because they're these are former these are former uh like broadcasters from TV and they weren't >> Yeah, they weren't they weren't doing >> they weren't doing well. So they segueed on to YouTube because they're trying to move into the uh into the content creator space where you know they're obviously independent um you know researchers such as yourself and other people. It's like they're trying to move in on on the territory so they can you know kind of mitigate the uh the information and and how far we should go and >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Control the narrative. They're they're looking to control the narrative. So I when I see News Nation, I'm like, uh, >> yeah, the guy is 20. So So someone here says, >> um, I like this young dude. Already saw that. >> Um, uh, his name is Adam Mockler. That's the kid's name. He has well over 1 million subscribers on YouTube alone. He's he's built an empire. Um, he is, um, a quoteunquote leftist, a liberal. Um, I do fall more so on the conservative side. For those of you who may be new here, um I believe that it's impossible um to be a believer of Christ and to be a Democrat. That's my personal opinion, but I don't I I don't fall into the leftight paradigm anyways. But if we're having that conversation, then I I think it makes more sense to fall on the conservative side. But I will say Adam is extremely bright. Um it's just when it gets to certain conversations, it seems like all of his intelligence goes out the window. Like if you ask him a simple question like, "How many genders are there?" all of a sudden he can't tell you how many genders there are. It's very odd >> that we get that way on on a question that we all know the answer to, you know, conversations like >> whenever we start speaking about abortion and things of that sort, but I'm digressing. >> Um, very bright kid. We just definitely don't agree on a lot of things when it comes to politics, but he completely owned Andrew here. And I think he exposed something bigger about Andrew. It almost seems to me that Andrew, I don't know if he's supposed to be taking over in Charlie K Charlie Kirk's role. I don't think it's the right move um for them. I I I just don't think he have it in him to debate because doing this back and forth. He goes, "Whoa, your energy here." It's like the kid's energy wasn't even bad. He's asking you a simple question. He's wanting an answer and you're refusing to answer a very simple question of disavowing um certain hate groups, you know. >> Yeah. About your character. It's a direct question about how you feel about something regarding how that affects your character. Yeah. >> Exactly. Now, I have an even crazier clip for everybody. And I haven't even told Kelvin about this. Kelvin may have seen this before, >> but something that I always wondered about Charlie Kirk >> Yeah. was he was a really big proponent and defender of this foreign nation. >> Yeah. >> And I always thought to myself, I said, Charlie Kirk is bright. He has to know that there is a book and there is a belief system that a lot of them from this foreign country operate from. There's a lot of things that they believe and is it and it is called the Talmood. >> Yeah. >> Has Charlie Kirk ever read it? Of course, he's read the Talmood before. I said, "Why does no one never ask him that question? Why is that never brought up to him?" >> Yeah, >> but it was brought up to him. I'm about to show you all >> Charlie Kirk's response at a debate. >> It was at a debate. He was not only asked about it, >> but he was read out >> in detail the things that the Talmoose says, >> and it's some of the most demonic crazy things. >> It is. It is. What's what's even more crazy? What's even more crazy? Absolutely, James. What's even more crazy is Charlie Kirk's response. As a follower of Christ, it is literally in congruent with your belief as a follower of Christ. If you claim to be a follower of Christ, you have to disavow the things that these people stand for and what they believe. Let's see how Charlie Kirk responds when it is read out loud to him in front of a crowd of hundreds of people. Let's see what Charlie Kirk has to say. Uh refers to Jesus as being a fornicator. >> Gon 56 refers to >> There it is. >> 4713 uh refers to Jesus as being a fornicator. Gon 56 refers to Jesus burning in hell. And um Shabbat 104B says that Mary was a Baba Messia 24A reads that a Jew if a Jew finds an object that a gentile [ __ ] has lost does not have to return it. Yebath 98a says all children of goyam are animals. Uh Tuspath Jeremiah 84b says if you eat with a [ __ ] is the same as eating with a dog. Babessia 114 beast as say as Gentiles go are not humans they are beasts >> all of which are legitimate verses all of which are legitimate verses Judaism here's my my opinion we'll just disagree I believe that Paul said in the New Testament we must bless them we must bless the Jews I believe that our own Lord and Savior when we go up and we see the Lord of lord and the King of Kings we're going to see a rabbitic rabbi by the name of Jesus Christ sitting on the throne he was That's a severe. >> He was a Torah observant, Shab Shabbas observant Jew. Here's the thing. We just have difference of opinion. I think we have an obligation to the Jews as Christians. You might disagree. We can disagree. Thank you for your time. I got to get the next question. Thank you. >> He didn't even address Hold on, bro. This infuriates me so much. He didn't even address what the kid said. Charlie Kirk, he just read directly from the Talmood all these things that are literally antithetical to what you believe as a Christian and a follower of Christ. He just read things that are evil. They believe that Jesus Christ is burning in I mean burning in hell in urine. >> This is what they believe. Did you hear what they just said? They believe that that people are beasts. >> They are not human. >> I was laughing because I could see Charlie was so uncomfortable. He's just adjusting his neck the entire time. He knew it was bad and that's why he he kind of he rushed and bulldozed through his response and just was like, "Oh, no. Thank you. Next, next." Because he knew he knew it was wrong. >> Have you all ever seen this clip before? I've never seen this. >> Like that. That for me was like that was something that he was it was almost like he knew if he responded to that >> the wrong way. correct correct way. He was done for. >> He was done for. >> So he he looks like a man defeated like sitting in the chair like like blackmailed. >> That was that's why I was laughing cuz I was like he looks black. >> It's so obvious. If you ever needed a clip to better understand who this person was and who was funding him, here's proof. >> Yeah, >> here's proof. >> Yeah, >> brother. You can clearly say I first and foremost he starts off by saying those are all legitimate verses. Now to be fair to him I don't believe that he was saying those were legitimate verses that he agrees with. >> He agrees with Yeah. >> I think he was just saying those are legitimate verses that are in the mood. >> They're there. >> Kurt, if you know this, >> what are you doing, brother? >> You're uplifting. >> They're antithetical to each other. They don't they don't they don't mix. They don't mix. They're antithetical to Christianity. It doesn't It doesn't mix. >> It doesn't mix. I'm I'm I'm going to run this back. Some people are asking me to run it back. I'm going to run it back. >> Uh refers to Jesus. 4713 uh refers to Jesus being a fornicator. >> They call Jesus Christ a fornicator. His his his behavior has me cracking up. Charlie's behavior. >> If you're not a believer, this is different. >> Yeah. For those of us that are believers, you are calling our Lord a fornicator. >> Yeah. >> That's like walking in someone's house and disrespecting the owner. >> Yeah. >> Getting 56 refers to Jesus burning in hell. Um, Shabbat 105 says, >> they said Mary was a wh ho e. >> Mhm. >> Please help me understand. Do Christians here not support Israel? Because the Bible is very clear on those who bless. You're actually wrong. That's actually not even what the scripture says. I read this online live before and just so we're clear in the scriptures, Israel um are followers of Christ, the descendants of Abram. It it is not a a a foreign nation, especially it's not a foreign government respectfully. And and and I do mean that with grace. It is not talking about um someone and their ethnicity. That is not what the scriptures, if you bring the scriptures to me that prove that, I will completely take back everything I said, but you won't find it. The scriptures are clear. >> Yeah. >> And even if the even if that's what the scripture says, if you have a specific group of of said nation that believes the things that this kid is reading, >> why would you not be furious? furious in righteousness. But why would you not be furious as a believer of Christ >> at offense offense to what's being said? >> Why are you not offended? How dare you say that about my Lord? >> And and I'm saying and I'm saying that as a person that I I I grew up in Christianity, right? >> But like I me myself, I haven't been involved in Christianity in quite a bit or any specific religion for a bit. And I I kind of have my reasons for it. I I don't see anything wrong with Christianity, but I just haven't been actively involved. So, I'm saying that as a person that's I actually am not really in practicing, >> right? >> So, I'm saying that first. >> Yeah. So, I'm saying naturally common sense wise, you would be offended hearing something like that because that's a complete disrespect to your >> beliefs, >> your belief system. Yeah. >> Your your your spiritual belief system, which is the deepest that it gets. But not only does he not refute it, but at to your point, >> the swig of the drink >> clearly uncomfortable here. >> Yeah, the swig of the drink just got me. I was just like, >> "Here, let's run it back." >> 4713 uh refers to Jesus being a fornicator. >> Wow. >> Gidden 56 refers to Jesus burning in hell. And >> Wow. >> Um Shabbat 104b says that Mary was a >> Wow. Baba Messia 24A reads that a Jew if a Jew finds an object that a gentile [ __ ] has lost does not have to return it. >> Yebamoth 98a says all children of goyam are animals. Uh Tuspath Jeremiah 84b says if you eat with a [ __ ] is the same as eating with a dog. >> Wow. >> Babessia 114b says Gentiles go are not humans. They are beasts. >> Charlie Kirk gets so uncomfortable. He's ready to get this over. All of which are legitimate verses. All of which are legitimate verses Judaism. Here's my my opinion. We'll just disagree. I believe that Paul said in the New Testament, we must bless him. We must bless the Jews. I believe that our own Lord and Savior when we go up and we see the Lord of Lord and the King of Kings, we're going to see a rabbitic rabbi by the name of Jesus Christ sitting on the throne. He was a category. He was a Torah observant, Shab Shabbas observant Jew. Here's the thing. We just have difference of opinion. I think we have an obligation to the Jews as Christians. You might disagree. We can disagree. Thank you for your time. I got to get to the next question. >> Completely. You You don't have to get to the next question. You completely dismissed this kid and you didn't address a single thing that he read. >> Yeah, >> that is crazy. Yeah, >> that's but that's how he was operating at that time. When he if he got asked a question he didn't like, he would kind of just bulldoze through through things. I've seen Charlie do that quite quite a bit. Maybe even on subjects about race relations. >> He would just kind of bull bulldoze through his response without actually having any like um humility to admit if something doesn't sound congruent or consistent. Right. >> Yeah. You know, so that that's that for me that's what Charlie's fallacy was. He his only his main fallacy is that he would be arrogant at times where it wasn't necessary just to get through a conversation. He'd be very dismissive and disregarding. And that was one of the moments where, you know, he was I could see like the side of his face. He kept like lifting his cheek like like he didn't want to be bothered with it. He kept doing that, you know, the the hand rubbing through the hair and >> he was uncomfortable. That is clear footage of a man not comfortable with being asked about that particular place and their book that they practice. So yeah, not not a good look. >> No, I agree. I agree. >> It was my first time seeing that. I hadn't seen that before. >> Yeah, I had either. I saw it maybe a couple of days ago. >> I only saw the Go ahead. >> Yeah. I only I only saw the one where he got questioned from the um the uh Iranian Muslim guy. Well, he was a Muslim. >> Oh, yeah. Yeah. I know what you're talking about. >> Yeah. The uh Iranian Christian guy, the guy from >> Yeah. who questioned him about the war. >> Yeah. And and then he explained, "Well, look, my family is Iranian Christians, you know." He's like, >> and he was like, "Oh, there's Christians in in Iran." He was like, "Yeah, there's a lot of us. There's a lot of Christians that are Palestinian, too." >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. and he was explaining that Christianity has been protected in Iran and in other countries, but he was so used to hearing about Muslim extremists that he couldn't fathom that actually being something, you know, that's a part of Islamic countries that they do have Christians that are there. I mean, there's there's a whole Christian diaspora that are in Syria that are unfortunately at the moment, uh, a lot of them are being killed by >> Yeah. by the new regime that's there. But yeah, I digress. >> That's crazy. That's That's crazy. Americans, do you get free college? No, we do not. Yet, we're sending our tax dollars overseas um to a foreign nation that has I believe they have free healthcare as well. I may be wrong. >> Yeah. Free healthcare, free college, all these things. >> What is going on, man? >> I'm I'm Look, I I'm where I'm at. I'm in New Zealand. I'm in New Zealand. So, we we get we get free healthcare here as well, too. Like like you can go to the hospital >> for any reason. >> Any reason. If you got something wrong with your pancreas, you got to have an emergency surgery. They'll do it. >> And how does that work? Like who who pays the um so are they being paid by tax dollars or what? >> Yeah, tax dollars. It's government government subsidized. So they have something here called uh ACC and they take it out of like your pay, but it covers for universal basic like healthcare even even for surgeries in general. like you have to have an emergency surgery, they take care take care of it. It's covered. But over there in America, it's all insurance policies and this sort of it's crazy. And then like like they were saying over like you were saying over in in the country in the Middle East. >> Yeah. >> We're America's subsidizing their their healthcare. So I'm a dual national because I I live between New Zealand and and the States, but mainly in New Zealand. But yeah, if something goes wrong me healthwise, I come here. I don't go to America. >> That's wild, man. >> That's wild. >> Um the the last thing I want to react to so that way I can give people the opportunity to stick around if they want to. >> I'm going to react to this Jasmine Crockett clip. For those of you who don't know, Jasmine Crockett is a congresswoman um that represents the state of Texas. >> Her and Stephen A. Smith, for those of you who don't know, Stephen A. Smith is a um really big uh he's really big into sports. >> Yeah. Sports commentator. Yes. >> Yeah. A sports commentator. >> And um it's he he made some comments about Jasmine Crockett. And a lot of people got upset and I'm going to give my thoughts. Obviously Kelvin will give his thoughts as well. And then after that, um, Kelvin and I are going to delve into some other things specifically that he experienced in his career that I think a lot of you will find very interesting if you find my content interesting. So without further ado, let's go to the clip. Let's do it for the okie do. Stop believing the lies that they are putting out there and the terrible racist tropes that they are constantly using to rile people up. It is time to recognize that while you thought the enemy was the immigrant or you thought the enemy was the trans person or you thought the the enemy was the black folk or you thought the enemy were the women when the reality is that the only person that is harming you right now. If you are struggling to make sure that you can pay your bills, if you're struggling to feed your family, if you are struggling to find a job, if you are struggling to keep your business open, or if you are farmer, while we currently have record level bankruptcies by farmers, it is not any of those people on the list. It is the old white nepo baby that is sitting in the White House that is causing all the destruction, pain, and problems that you are enduring. how Jasmine Crockett chooses to express herself. I'm like, is that going to help your district in Texas? >> Now, let me just say this just really fast for those especially for those of you that will be watching this back and not watching it in real time. Um, Jasmine Crockett was the African-American lady that was just speaking. Once again, she represents the state of Texas. She is known um in fact she's gained a lot of popularity uh because she is very very uh flamboyant and very very quoteunquote ratchet. Yes, I'm not saying that she's not qualified, but she is over the top. Um it's it's it's really bad, but I will say that the clip that we just watched is not a great example of what I just described. I have no problem with the clip that we just watched. I think she conducted herself appropriately. However, you don't have to know who Jasmine Crockett is. You don't even have to understand politics. All I ask you to mean, all I would need you to do is go to YouTube and type in um Jasmine Crockett ghetto uh moments. She literally has >> Oh no. a highlight reel of her in Congress using colloquialism, calling people weird names that you should only be using if you're like talking with your friends at the bar, if you go out to bars, or talking with your friends in the comfort of your home. She's using this language in Congress. Stephen A. Smith is about to give his feedback on the way in which Jasmine Crockett has been conducting herself for the past year because almost every clip you find of Jasmine Crockett, she's calling Donald Trump every name in the book. Let's be clear, I have a lot of criticisms about Donald Trump. Obviously, if you follow this channel, >> but there's a way as a congressional member when you have a constituency to represent to conduct yourself. Stephen A. Smith is about to give his feedback and he got a lot of push back from the black community as you're about to hear. >> Okay. Aren't you there to find a way to get stuff done as opposed to just being an impediment to what to what Trump wants? How much work goes into that? I'm just going to go off about Trump, cuss him out every chance I get, say the most derogatory, incendiary things imaginable, >> and that's my day's work. That ain't work. Work is saying that's the man in power. I know what his agenda is. I'm not exactly in a position to stop him since the Republicans have the Senate and the House. But maybe if I'm willing to work with this man, I might get something out of it for my constituency. Because like Joe Mansion said, he's there to represent or was there for 15 years to represent the people of West Virginia. She's supposed to be there to represent the people of Texas. I don't know. Maybe that just sounds ignorant because it's so simple, but it ain't that damn complicated. We make it complicated. I'm I'm going to let I'm going to let this clip finish. I promise. But I do want to address this comment right here. Peace be with you. She could be a plant also. I 100% agree. And that's something I'm going to talk about next. And I'm going to I'm not going to say prove. I don't want to just loosely use that term, but I'm going to tell you all why I believe that this woman is 100% a plant >> and why you should not be trusting these politicians. Go ahead, Kelvin. >> No, exactly what I was thinking as well, too. When Okay, there's when they platform someone who lacks any type of like uh elegance, >> right, >> about how they go about >> where do these people come from? >> How did you get in that position behaving that way? Well, uh, because someone found usage in that as an example of something to replicate in our community, and I feel like they do that intentionally. It's sort of like who platformed um, Sexy Red, >> you know, >> man, that is a great great example. >> Yeah, they that someone finance and whoever her financial backers are, depending on where where they come from, >> someone put her there for a position to kind of hinder our community. So, that's just my thoughts. >> No, I I think you're spot on. Now, let's continue. >> Yeah. >> Damn, it's frustrating. >> It is. It really can be. >> I felt compelled to come on the air a little bit earlier this week after what I've had to endure this weekend. But I had to endure this weekend where an abundance of people talking a whole lot of stuff about me because uh they did not like what I had to say about Representative Jasmine Crockett. She is a Democrat out of Texas. Um uh Texas's 30th congressional district. Um her work, you know, and her verbiage and all of that stuff speaks for itself. Um, and she has become, you know, a big- time public figure in in essence, not just as a representative, but speaking out on a plethora of issues involving the current administration in the White House, etc., etc. And I made some noise last week because I had the tmerity, the unmititigated gall to say this about Representative Crockett when talking about the state of our politics in the midst of a government shutdown, by the way, that has unfolded since October 1st. brilliant black woman representing over 750,000 people is engaging in verbiage and rhetoric for the streets. >> Bingo. >> And that's fine when you in the streets. How many of y'all bring the streets to the table when you at the negotiating table trying to get a deal done? How many of you are able to think that for a second that you able to to to bring street verbiage to Capitol Hill and that's going to work for you? You literally have senators and congressional figures on Capitol Hill on the side of the Republicans telling the networks, whether it's Fox News, News Nation, or anybody else, please, please, please put her front and center on camera. Why would they do that? >> Yep. >> Because they know i