Dave Smith Warns Against Dark Forces and Violent Reactions Following Charlie Kirk Assassination Tragedy
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Theo Von Reveals the Most Horrific Aspect of Charlie Kirk's Assassination That Shook America
27:22
Tim Dillon and Max Blumenthal Reveal Charlie Kirk's Growing Skepticism Toward Israel and Donor Pressures Before His Death
36:42
The Charlie Kirk Utah Valley University Shooting: Media Response and Leftist Celebrations Exposed
14:49
Dave Smith Warns Against Dark Forces and Violent Reactions Following Charlie Kirk Assassination Tragedy
Dave Smith addresses the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative influencer who was killed while exercising free speech at a public debate event. Smith emphasizes the importance of moral clarity in condemning this murder without qualification, while warning against falling into darkness through vengeful reactions. He cautions both sides against inflammatory responses, noting the dangers of collective blame and government expansion that could follow. Smith's message focuses on choosing not to escalate violence, resisting propaganda, and maintaining the principles Kirk stood for rather than letting his death become a catalyst for further tragedy.
Dave Smith weighs in on the assassination of Charlie Kirk with stark moral clarity. The tragedy represents something deeply disturbing about the current state of American discourse. Kirk was engaged in exactly what he always did—sitting at an institution of higher learning, ready to have an exchange of ideas and achieve truth through debate. Anyone who disagreed with him could come up and challenge him, and he would respond. It was an exercise in free speech, and then he was sniped out.
Smith describes this as a powerful and profoundly disturbing snapshot of where society stands. The situation is pretty black and white, despite some people equivocating. The person going out and saying "Let's have a battle of ideas, and I will answer all challenging questions" is the good guy. The person who murders the husband and father in cold blood for the crime of discussing ideas is the bad person who needs to be held accountable.
If someone doesn't have that level of moral clarity, then what else is there to talk about? This is what society should encourage—a culture of people living amongst various different ideologies and factions having debates freely without the use of violence. Kirk got shot anyway, and if someone doesn't come down on the side of recognizing this as a preposterous, vile, abhorrent murder with no justification, they are lost morally with no moral compass.
The Most Basic Litmus Test of Morality
Smith frames this as the most simple of tests—the most basic test of moral character. It's like considering settling down with someone and starting a family, but first needing to agree on something fundamental like not violently abusing children. When something like this happens, the test is really simple: Is your reaction just "oh my god, this is horrible and we can't have this in our society" or do you have anything else to say?
There should be no qualifier whatsoever. Not even something like "while I don't agree with Charlie Kirk on his issues." No qualifier at all. That's the simplest and most basic litmus test to deduce whether someone is wearing moral character around them or has succumbed to demons.
Regardless of how anyone feels about Kirk personally, this applies universally. Kirk believed things that many people don't believe, but that has no bearing on the fact that he was a father leaving behind a family with two young children who will never know who he is. That is the sickest tragedy about this whole thing. They were young and won't know him now.
The Dangerous Responses From Both Sides
While many people have come out with good reactions to this tragedy, some have used it as political capital or a propaganda tool. Some called it gun violence immediately to try to push their favored political direction. There have been bad responses on both the left and right.
Influencers on platforms like TikTok have been seen saying they're glad Kirk is dead, laughing about it, claiming he asked for it. Media outlets suggested it might have been a Kirk supporter shooting in celebration. Another anchor suggested Kirk was just a hate speech monger who deserved what he got. These responses reveal people who are psychotic barbarians.
This isn't a political conversation anymore—it's a spiritual conversation. Those celebrating or justifying this are possessed by evil. When you see video of what happened to Kirk and recognize how real this situation gets, the thing everyone should come together on is that we do not want to go down this path. This is a very dark path, and there's real danger of escalation.
You can't just do this and think the other side is incapable of responding in kind. This is a dangerous path. Smith's message is simple: calm down everybody, take a breath, and don't do anything stupid. Don't do something stupid and senseless and violent in response to this. That only will lead to more violence and make the situation much worse.
Warning Against Right-Wing Overreaction
Smith expresses concern about some right-wing responses as well. Within an hour after the death was announced, some prominent voices were saying things like "the Democrats killed Kirk today" and "this is war." Others suggested the backlash would not be pretty, or called for outlawing political parties and creating censorship regimes.
Treating this as a new Reichstag fire could be disastrous. The lessons of the past must be learned. Consider how 9/11 was twisted against the American people when it was blamed on terrorists—the result was the DHS, Pentagon expansion, endless wars, and more, all justified by blaming a vast swath of people or an abstraction.
Dividing the American populace down the middle and saying "it's the left" that shot Charlie Kirk is dangerous. Even statements from political leaders calling out "the radical left" for killing Kirk fan dangerous flames. Blaming those who aren't culpable or an entire political sector of the country—some of which include neighbors—could lead to a right-wing reaction that wouldn't be pretty.
Resisting the Temptation to Fall Into Darkness
Smith acknowledges the temptation many feel. He understands why people share videos declaring "war" or get fired up with righteous anger. He gets the temptation, but urges people to think about the message being sent. Obviously justice is needed for whoever did this, and answers are needed about what happened, but nothing will bring Charlie Kirk back or fix his destroyed family right now.
There's a temptation to sink into what Smith believes is a dark force. When something like this happens, there's this temptation to get angry, and it's incredibly easy to get angry. For many people who loved Kirk, he was somebody they knew and just watched get publicly executed in cold blood despite being guilty of no crime. Then seeing videos of people celebrating it makes it easy to fall into that darkness.
It's natural to ask what the right response is when they kill someone you love and then celebrate it. It's very easy when going down that path to start coming up with what seems like the right response. But there's nothing but destruction behind that path. No matter how tempting it may be or how good it might feel, everyone knows on some level that then the darkness wins and nothing good can come from that.
The Right Path Forward
Smith cautions against posting and sharing videos of leftists celebrating Kirk's death, even though he understands where that impulse comes from. Working up anger may not be the best thing, and it's probably not what Kirk would have wanted either. Kirk was against all of that and always wanted things to calm down and not escalate to violence.
The foundational principle of the nation is free speech. Kirk was exercising free speech and got murdered for it. Maybe that could be a moment where everybody goes "whoa, hold on, no, that's not who we are." People get to determine who they are as a society. The choice is to decide it's not that.
Those celebrating this are morally bereft, but a large number of people who wouldn't necessarily be expected based on their appearance or political proclivities have actually weighed in properly, saying this is a vile atrocity and a murder that can't be justified in any way. Being sensible is the right way out of this.
People can fall into the darkness or try to build a better future without a horrific government response to this atrocity. It will be propagandized—that's already known. Kirk was probably a top three conservative influencer, and this cannot devolve into additional violence. It would be the easiest thing to do, but Kirk believed in free speech and championed it. He had debates with people and still got shot. The dark forces exist but shouldn't be embraced.
Finding Justice Without Giving In to Evil
If there is to be just retribution, let it be about finding out who's responsible, making sure that person is held accountable, and if there's a conspiracy, getting to the bottom of it. But don't give in to the evil spirits. It's real easy to fall into anger when looking at people celebrating Kirk's death, thinking about war and revenge, but that misses the fact that many others are actually saying the right thing.
Videos have gone viral of people who appear left-wing saying "what's wrong with all you guys? A human being just got killed. He's got a family. Even if you disagree with his ideas, he was there to debate the ideas. What's wrong?" There were tons of people agreeing with those sentiments too. Keep that in mind—there's also beauty in the world and people doing the right things.
Historical Context and Future Concerns
This is a truly horrifying event without many parallels in recent memory. There have been shootings of prominent people—the softball game shooting in DC in 2017, the shooting of Gabby Giffords, and others—but there isn't much parallel here considering Kirk's influence. His influence was considerably high, perhaps not approaching what Martin Luther King's was in the 1960s, but still substantial. What followed King's assassination were riots, and the hope is that doesn't happen in this case.
The propensity and propaganda that could unfold in response is visible. The hope is that the flames of this fire are not fanned by the right, and that the left doesn't double down on celebrating this tragedy. That's the quickest way to right-wing reactionary totalitarianism.
For any leftist who is in any way encouraged or tempted to celebrate this travesty, continuing down that line and trying to provoke the right will produce a version of the right about a hundred times worse than the current version. Everyone will suffer for it.
Silver Linings and the Path Ahead
There are silver linings. Good people are responding to this properly, taking a breath, letting rationality prevail. There are also people handling it terribly. Where this goes remains to be seen, but the warning stands against fanning flames toward more violence or giving the state more power to deal with this.
Finding the culprit, bringing them to justice, throwing the book at them, and going from there while learning as much as possible—that's the appropriate response. But blaming an entire half of the country for this atrocity must be avoided. The lessons of history show that when people act impulsively toward these things and blame entire groups rather than those directly culpable, the result is collective government expansion and the sword of the state pointed at everyone's neck.
When Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, the response was collective punishment not against Japanese people or the Japanese government, but Japanese Americans who were rounded up and placed into internment camps based on ancestry. The same happened to some Italian Americans and German Americans. That is not the way to handle this. Asking for a totalitarian system by carrying out collective punishment against an entire group of people will only lead to more suffering.
The choice remains: fall into darkness or build a better future where this doesn't devolve into additional violence and government overreach. Kirk championed free speech and open debate. The best way to honor that is to resist the temptation toward vengeance and collective blame, seek justice for the actual perpetrator, and refuse to let this tragedy become the catalyst for greater evils.
