Up Next
Lecrae Moore Had a Vision the Night Charlie Kirk Was Murdered and What It Revealed About Culture War
39:44
Mark Geragos and Prosecutor Matt Murphy Analyze a Shocking Murder Case and America's Collapsing Discourse
13:45
Glenn Greenwald and Analysis on Political Violence, Reactions, and the Dangers of Reactionary Totalitarianism
29:47
Theo Von Reveals the Most Horrific Aspect of Charlie Kirk's Assassination That Shook America
Theo Von shares his raw, unfiltered thoughts on the assassination of Charlie Kirk, focusing not on political divisions but on something deeper—the cowardly nature of the attack and what it means for free speech in America. Von, who admittedly disagreed with Kirk on many issues, reflects on what made Kirk brave: his willingness to engage face-to-face with adversarial voices on college campuses. The comedian and podcaster grapples with fear, safety, and a growing sense that dark forces operate beyond public view. In a moment free from typical political rhetoric, Von asks the questions many Americans are quietly asking: Where is safe anymore? What happens when doing the right thing, sharing ideas, debating openly, gets you killed? His reflections capture the human toll of political violence and the sickness many feel watching discourse destroyed from a distance.
The Cowardice That Sickened Theo Von
Theo Von opens up about the heaviness he's carried since Charlie Kirk's assassination, admitting the weight of it surprised even him. He didn't know Kirk personally and disagreed with him on many issues, but Von recognized something he deeply admired: Kirk's bravery. Unlike most podcasters who broadcast from the safety of a studio, Kirk "tweeted with his feet," traveling to college campuses to engage with the most hostile audiences imaginable. He didn't just preach to the choir—he walked into the lion's den with a microphone and invited debate.
What struck Von most wasn't just the violence itself, but the cowardice of it. Kirk showed up. He stood at that microphone, ready to exchange ideas with anyone willing to engage. His assassin, however, attacked from a distance, never looking Kirk in the eyes, never shaking his hand, never attempting to counter his arguments in the arena Kirk created for exactly that purpose. Von describes this as the most sickening element: someone so far away shutting down a voice without ever having the courage to face that person directly.
When Doing the Right Thing Gets You Killed
Von wrestles with a painful irony throughout his reflection. Kirk did what we're supposed to do in a free society—he shared his views, listened to opposing arguments, and created space for public discourse. He was a free speech absolutist who opposed hate speech codes and believed deeply in open dialogue. And yet, despite doing everything "right" in that context, he was still gunned down.
This ruptures something fundamental in Von's understanding of safety and fairness. If engaging in good faith, showing up to debate, and encouraging free expression can still get you killed, then what's the point? Where is safe? Von asks this repeatedly, not just about public figures, but about everyday Americans—parents sending kids to school, people walking their dogs, anyone stepping into public space to share a thought or a song or a poem.
The assassination didn't just take Kirk's life. It robbed his two young children of their father. They won't remember him. That reality, Von says, sickens him most. The violence didn't just destroy one man—it shattered a family and left innocent children to grow up without the person who should have been there.
The 4K Horror and America's New Reality
Von points out something Americans haven't experienced before: watching a high-profile political assassination unfold in graphic, 4K detail. Previous assassinations—JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr.—weren't broadcast with this level of visceral clarity. Seeing Kirk's death in such brutal detail has affected people in profound ways, bringing out both the worst and best of humanity.
Some celebrated the killing. Others weaponized it to call for state retaliation against entire political groups. Von doesn't align with either extreme. He's just broken, he says, trying to figure out why this hit him so hard. Maybe it's the attack on free speech. Maybe it's the unfairness. Maybe it's the realization that evil operates from a distance, hidden and cowardly.
He describes a growing feeling shared by many: that dark, powerful people know something the rest of us don't. That official narratives crafted by the FBI and social media will always feel incomplete or wrong. That no matter what story emerges, it won't satisfy the gnawing sense that something deeper and more sinister is at play.
The Loss of Safety in American Life
Von reflects on how different things feel now compared to the past. He's 42, and he remembers the 1990s as a different time—less polarized, less vicious, less consumed by culture war hatred. He wonders if that's just nostalgia or if something genuinely shifted. Maybe humanity has always been fallen, he suggests, echoing a Christian understanding of sin. But it does feel like respect for safety has eroded.
He's scared now. Scared in a way he wasn't before. Scared that sharing ideas publicly, standing on a stage, or engaging in debate might cost you your life. That fear isn't limited to high-profile figures—it trickles down into everyday interactions. If Charlie Kirk, who built an entire platform on civil discourse, can be murdered for his beliefs, then what does that say about the rest of us?
The video ends with Von admitting he doesn't have answers. He's rambling, he says, just trying to process feelings he didn't expect to have about someone he never met. But the feelings are real: grief, fear, sickness, and a deep sense that something sacred—the ability to speak freely and safely—has been violated in a way that can't easily be repaired.
A Moment Beyond Politics
What makes Von's reflection valuable is that it strips away the typical political posturing. He's not calling for revenge or pushing a policy agenda. He's just a guy trying to make sense of senseless violence. He acknowledges Kirk's widow and the heartbreaking task she faced explaining this to her children, and he mourns the loss of a man who, despite their differences, represented something important: the courage to engage.
Von's message resonates because it's human. It's not about left versus right, pro-Kirk or anti-Kirk. It's about recognizing that when violence silences discourse, everyone loses. When cowardice replaces courage, society fractures. And when doing the right thing—showing up, speaking honestly, inviting debate—becomes dangerous, something fundamental breaks.
Americans across the political spectrum are grappling with these same questions. Von's vulnerability in admitting his fear, his confusion, and his grief offers a different kind of commentary—one rooted not in ideology but in the shared human experience of witnessing something profoundly wrong and struggling to understand what it means.
Video Transcript
It feels like some people in the world,
like some like dark and powerful people
know what's going on and they're not
telling the rest of us. Like this that
video was so horrific is that it it felt
cowardly. At least come and come and
meet me here that he went he showed up
to have conversations.
Diovan just pinpointed the most horrible
part of the Charlie Kirk assassination
in his eyes. the most evil aspect of it
and the thing that will cause the most
negative ramifications for society. And
I decided to cover this because Theo is
not an ideologue. He's kind of an
everyday Joe. He has shared political
opinions, but I think that's carving a
little bit different of an angle on this
than I've seen portrayed out there. So,
let's get his sense on this. Please like
the video and subscribe to the channel.
I
>> I I I was thinking about Charlie Kirk.
I've been thinking about him some the
past few days and not even just thinking
about him, just feeling the
the heaviness of
uh the assassination of the murder,
you know, just how everybody saw it and
how severe it was. Uh,
and it left me
it may like obviously it's horrific and
it's heartbreaking and um, and I didn't
know Charlie, you know, I know we had
different views on a lot of things. I,
you know, I I I wasn't in his world a
lot. Um,
but I admired
that he was brave. He went out and
uh had conversations in,
you know, he kind of like like he
tweeted with his feet, you know, he went
in instead of just yelling from,
you know, from a desk or something or,
you know, like most podcasters were
sitting in a room saying stuff and and
then putting it out. He went out into
the world. Uh, and I really admired
that.
I do admire it. Um,
>> yeah, I got to agree. I mean, regardless
of where you stand on his viewpoints,
and you know, not a news flash to a lot
of you, some of them I very much
disagree with, especially as it
pertained to his insistence on
supporting Israel over such a long
stretch and, you know, antagonizing
China, some of his penchant for
protectionism. There's a lot of things
that I would have disagreed with
Charlie, but no one can take this part
away from him that he went to these
campuses with microphones talking to and
willing to engage with the most
adversarial people imaginable toward him
and his views. And he was a free speech
absolutist. I really do believe in, you
know, the most sincere way. Glenn
Greenwald has showed this too and shared
this opinion that he truly didn't
believe in curtailing free speech. She
didn't believe in any kind of hate
speech codes. Nothing under the guise of
we need to pass these new anti-semitic
codes and put those into state laws. He
did oppose that sort of thing. And you
know, say what you want. You know,
there's a lot of people that are going
to watch this and say, "What are you
talking about? This guy's an idiot. He
had stupid opinions. You know, some
people have even justified his murder."
But I don't think most people can take
that away from him.
And it just I it just left me feeling so
like uh
just kind of broken. A part of me I
don't even know what part of me feels
kind of broken.
And I don't know if it's about,
you know, that it's because someone is
sharing their point of views or that
someone's uh, you know, that free speech
is getting um,
gunned down or if you know
I I don't know exactly why it feels like
it affected me so much.
You know, of course that sort of thing
affects you. It happens a lot in the
world these days.
And I think maybe just the severity of
it, how just uh graphic it seemed and
was, you know, um yeah, seeing that in
4K is something Americans haven't
experienced. You know, we all know about
the Kennedy assassination, the Kennedy
assassinations in the plural, Martin
Luther King, etc. That really wasn't
brought to the public in 4K like these
videos, and we're not going to show the
videos. Most people that are interested
in that sort of thing have seen it. But
it was gruesome and I really think that
turned a lot of people's minds in
various ways on this thing from extreme
you know wor the worst most toxic parts
of humanity to the most kindhearted
ones. I think we've really seen the
gamut of what humanity is both is
capable of both good and evil after this
story. That's something like I totally
agree with him on.
>> And sorry my hair is so me. It's like
I've been helping my buddy. I'm doing a
um
playing a character in this haunted
house. So, we've been practicing. But,
um
yeah, there was just something about it.
It's just left me scared first of all,
you know, and maybe that's selfish to
think that, but it left me scared,
you know, because a lot of people go out
and put themselves out in front of the
public. And we all do. We do it when we
walk down the street. We do it when we
take our dog to the dog park. Um,
you do it when you know if you step on a
stage and read a poem or sing a song or
or anything.
Um,
and that's kind of
I think that's what it was. It's like it
just like that's supposed to be
something that's kind of safe, right?
to be able to have a voice to say
something.
And whether people may agree with it or
not.
Um, I didn't know Charlie. I'd never
gotten to meet him. Uh, I didn't know. I
know we had different beliefs on some
things. I didn't know a lot of his
stuff, you know,
but
Excuse me. But I did uh I did admire
that he was brave.
Yeah, I think he was. And I think
there's something to what Theo is saying
about it being safe. The idea of sharing
information, sharing your thoughts and
opinions with others. I mean, in that
context, Charlie did the right thing,
quote unquote, the right thing. And
again, I know people are going to be
turned off on that that hate Charlie and
his politics and where he leaned in
certain directions, rightfully so in my
mind in some regards. But he did what
was right in regard to sharing truths
with others and being willing to receive
them from a microphone from very
adversarial people that had very
different opinions than his on foreign
policy and the culture war and gender
ideology and guns and taxes and all
sorts of issue the entire you know gamut
of issues. And that's what's the most
senseless part of this whole thing is
because he did the right thing in that
context and he still got shot. He still
got shot and presumably it was for his
opinions. And I'm not going to rattle
off, you know, a lot of the theories or
narratives regarding this. I think it's
healthy to question the prevailing
narratives of all times that the FBI
rushes in and, you know, creates a
narrative, pieces it together, etc. But
that's the worst part of this. you know,
he did the right thing to try to share
discourse. And there's videos him of him
talking about what his aim is in these
conversations, this campus tour that
he's done for years and years, and it's
to have conversations with people. So,
you get the benefit of the doubt. You
meet people, you might interact with
them, grow closer to them even in
difference such that violence doesn't
happen. And that's the worst part of
this. Ultimately, violence did happen.
And that, you know, ruptured the idea
that humanity
can just do that wholesale, I think. And
it really shows the evil nature of
humanity in some regards. But then some
of the outpouring of love that's come
from people of various political
directions I didn't assume also shows
the other side of humanity in this whole
thing that he went he showed up to have
conversations
and that it just like that just it was
such a final and sick and distant thing.
It was from so far away.
And maybe that's it. That somebody so
far away can can shut you down
without ever having even like looked at
you in the eyes or in person or shaking
your hand or anything.
>> I don't know.
>> I don't know. And I don't even know why
I'm like kind of speaking up about it.
Maybe. I don't know.
I think I'm trying to figure out.
I mean, it it scared me, you know. It It
made me It made me kind of scared. It
made me really scared.
Yeah. And uh
Yeah. And my you know, my prayers to his
family and to people that knew him and
loved him.
Um,
but yeah, there's supposed to be a thing
where you can
you can get up on a stage and share
something, right? You can get into a
public place and people would come to
see an art
or to jer at an art. I think a lot of
people that came to him came
cuz they wanted to uh combat him with
arguments or whatever be do the opposite
argument.
>> Yeah, that's what he thrived on doing.
And what just can't escape thoughts of
this situation in my head is, you know,
those two young children that will not
remember him. They're very young and
they won't remember him. That sickens me
the most that the person that deprived
him of his life is actually depriving
these two little children, these tiny
innocent children that had no bones and
you know the culture war politics or the
leftright dichotomy are going to grow up
without their father. And yeah, I mean
the response from the most vile people
is like even Hitler had family too. And
it's like dude, you're totally missing
the boat. And this has produced the
worst sides of humanity. Both the people
that that have said he deserves it and
call it a small niche. A lot of those
videos have gotten a lot of backlash.
It's led to, you know, a cancel campaign
against people doing that. And then
there are some voices on the right that
says the state has to be weaponized
against the entire left over this. I
think both of those responses are maybe
equally heinous and equally terrible in
this moment where people should reflect
and not take up arms, not have a call to
violence and not celebrate this, you
know, that just makes you a rotten
person. Um,
yeah. And just I think it's just a
culmination of that that sort of thing's
become so prevalent in our society.
like this. That video was so horrific
and you're just like that we've like
that we've
like it just felt like that this is the
this can't happen anymore,
you know, but you don't know what to do
and you I think you I don't know most
people or maybe I I don't know I think
that or I think that yeah people are
always like you want to you want to
at least be
have a certain level of like um
what's fair
and it just seems so unfair.
Yeah, man. That's an understatement. I
mean, let that sink in. if he didn't do
the right thing in terms of exchanging
ideas, debating them, you know, whether
you thought he was right or wrong,
whether you thought he got the best of
others or not, whether you thought he
got destroyed by some of his
adversaries,
you know, he did that. He did what was
supposed to be right. And it is unfair.
I mean, unfair is to say the least. And
this is probably the most high-profile
political assassination in terms of a
very influential person in society
outside of elected politics since Martin
Luther King. I can't think of a closer
parallel. I'm not saying that's one to
one, but I really believe that, you
know, his influence was that
significant. He's probably one of the he
was one of the top three influencers on
the entire right. Probably you could say
maybe Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson
are above him. There's some others in
that mix potentially, but those are
among the conversation. So, man, I just
think politicalbased assassinations
backfire in so many ways. You see it
throughout history. you know, the race
riots after Martin Luther King's
assassination, all the violence of the
weathermen and, you know, the state
being weaponized against black dissident
and co-intel pro, but going back far
longer than that, I mean, Julius Caesar
and Abraham Lincoln were both two
figures that were very unpopular among
certain segments of their respective
countries and societies and political
systems, and they essentially became
deified martyrs after dying. it really
does backfire and I think this has that
same propensity. Charlie wasn't elected
but that same sort of influence might
spill out of this. And you know, if you
listen to Charlie's widow, who I don't
think you can listen to that kind of
conversation regarding what she said in
response to it, regardless again of how
you saw Charlie's issues without crying
and her telling the story of how she's
going to keep his organization going,
hell or high water, and explaining how
she had to explain this to their young
children. I don't think you can get
through that without at least tearing up
a little bit. or if you're not the kind
of emotional person like that at least
thinking deeply about that
and so cowardly like if there is a
microphone there and he's there to
debate go and go and debate him you know
go speak your peace
whether the crowd agrees or whoever kind
of wins the debate or whatever I don't
know if that matters
what matters is that you like kind of
try and try and share whatever you're
whatever you're thinking or feeling.
And maybe there's people that don't
maybe there's people that don't feel
like they have a place to do that. I
don't know.
But to go that far away, not even have
the balls to go to the microphone or to
I think uh something about that makes me
sick. That's what it is. I think I just
it's made me feel sick.
And I think there's other stuff, you
know, like feeling like there's like it
feels like some people in the world,
like some like dark and powerful people
know what's going on and they're not
telling the rest of us.
I think that feels like what's happening
sometimes.
And I don't I don't I don't know if I'm
the only person that's feeling that.
I feel like they all know something
that's happening.
Yeah, I definitely don't think he's the
only one feeling that on this with, you
know, contradictions to the FBI
narrative. People raising questions over
Charlie Kirk, you know, being more
skeptical toward Israel in the last
month or so of his life, things like
that have raised questions. And I know
that Theo isn't the only one thinking
that. Certainly. So and thinking that no
matter what narrative was going to be
produced by the government or by you
know social media it was going to be
wrong innately. So you know just having
the worst feelings and impressions about
you know the other whatever the other is
if it's left versus right to you if it's
you know the citizens versus the
government whether it's citizens versus
corporations or whatever angle you're
looking at this at. A lot of people have
questions, I think rightly so, about
official narratives and the narrative
that's being produced here. You know,
there are so many pre-manufactured
narratives and then when the information
starts to come out, a lot of which
contradicts those pre-manufactured
narratives, people take it as if it's
like a hit to the religion that they
constructed around this and around it
themselves. I I really think there's
something to that. It always feels like
there's something bigger and evil in the
distance hiding behind something that's
kind of laughing a little
and um
yeah, and this just felt like the
pinnacle of the horn of whatever
creature that is kind of
uh or or Yeah. I don't know. Something
like that.
Yeah. Yeah. And it it I think it's
scare. It's like
Yeah. It's like where's where where is
safe?
Where where is safe?
Where is safe? How you know? How is like
a dad or parents who send their kids to
school supposed to feel like they're in
a safe place? It used to think it used
to feel like things were safe,
you know?
Or maybe it never I don't know. Maybe it
never felt like that.
But I I don't I don't know. It used to
feel like things were safe somehow.
Yeah. I think you can make both
arguments in this. We're a fallen
we're a fallen species. I think man is
fallen. I'm a Christian. That's what I
believe. And nothing explains this more
to me in terms of what I believe in
religion than sin entered the world. And
you know, I don't think that that's ever
going to be rectified in the world
through humans. You know, we can strive
to make society better. We can strive to
make government less oppressive than it
is. You know, things more conducive to
individual rights. That's my objective
in having this channel. But I don't
think we can perfect that whatsoever.
But I do agree that even in growing up
in my childhood, the 90s ju it just
seemed like another time. And I'm 42
years old. I know many of my viewers
probably a little bit older or about my
age. Let me know down below. Do you
agree that it's we have a different
society today than we do in the '9s?
It's more polarized than today. At least
it seems like that. It really seems like
there there's a more polarized society.
A lot of it is probably just narratives
that play out on social media that don't
necessarily play out in real life. I
think there's something to that, too.
But I just we never had, you know, the
the culture war, the woke versus the
right-wing culture war. We didn't have,
you know, cheering on the death of
innocents to the extent in my
recollections like we do now. We didn't
have trying to weaponize the state
against the others like we do now. I
know that that was part of the civil
rights era though too. So I don't want
to like detract from that being
happening in certain periods in American
politics. But I think at least there was
a law during the '9s and maybe 80s to
some extent. Tip O'Neal worked with
Ronald Reagan after all. Clinton worked
with the Republican Congress and you
know after all he didn't get off for it.
He didn't get shot through the ear.
Attempted assassinations.
Um, they did try to Yeah, I shouldn't
say they. I mean, Reagan was shot by
Hankley, right? But I really think that
it was a different world back then. Let
me know if you agree. This is just sense
of sense on my part and that the p that
other people had a respect for safety
and maybe that still is there and maybe
this is just such a moment that feels so
intense.
Um,
yeah. And I I don't know. I and nobody
has to hear what I want to say or
whatever. I'm I'm not like I don't know
anything. You know, I'm just I don't
know. I've had this feeling. It's just
been like, man, what is why is this
hitting me so hard? Somebody that I
don't know.
Yeah, I think a lot of people are having
that feeling, too. I disagree that no
one wants to hear him on this. This
video has over 2 million views so far,
by the way. And I think it's because of
how genuine Theo comes off. You're not
going to get, you know, political
manifestos out of his show. And I think
that's why a lot of people watch him, by
the way. That's why I'm watching him.
He's a real guy with genuine feelings on
a real quest about something that's, you
know, tumultuous and vile and in some
ways shows the darkest parts of
humanity. And he's navigating those
waters. That's why I'm watching. Um, so
I think there's value in this,
>> right? Um,
and yeah, I guess that's some of the
feelings that I'm kind of that I'm like
kind of surfing on a little bit
is that it it felt cowardly. At least
come and come and meet me here
and don't like me. That's, you know, I
can handle that. If you're here and you
disagree with me and you don't like me,
I can handle that.
But to do it from way over there, you
know,
and it's the same type of you see it in
other places around the world and we're
just sick of watching it.
We're sick of watching kind of someone
far away decide if someone
there is if they're okay or there. and
eliminating their life. You know, we're
sick of feeling that or I'm sick of
feeling Yeah. like it's unsafe out
there. I don't know. I don't know.
>> Yeah. I think there's some parallels
there. I mean, he cheated what was
right, the assassin, by shooting
Charlie. It was cowardly in a way
because, you know, he couldn't defeat
Charlie presumably on a microphone, even
though that was Charlie's entire
doctrine and mantra to come up and
debate him, even if you disagreed with
him profusely. If he really did disagree
with Charlie, I mean, I think it's a
pretty reasonable thing to say that
likely he was shot for what he believed.
I mean, I don't think that's a big
stretch knowing little else about the
truth and sifting through the
government's narratives on these sorts
of things, but I think we can at least
assume that, right? And it is cowardly.
And I think there is parallels to how
Washington DC treats individuals in the
United States and how they fleece us of
our wealth and you know violate our
rights. Every time you walk through the
airport, the TSA just shreds the Fourth
Amendment in front of your face and you
know they just inflate our currency.
They just send all of our money to
corporations and endless wars and the
pursuit of the Israel lobby and the
military-industrial complex. Loheed
Martin line the pockets of JP Morgan
bankers and Bank of America bankers and
by the way give uh big pharma like Fizer
and Mona immunity from all injuries
caused by vaccines and any kind of drugs
which now you know we're supposed to
just buy into all the prevailing
narratives about how you know it's the
government solving all these problems
but Americans feel otherwise. I think
there is some parallels to that. this
person far away trying to decide whether
you live or die, how your life's going
to turn out or not, whether you're
treated in an honest way or not, or
whether your rights will be violated,
like the ultimate way in which to
violate someone's rights, which was to
shoot Charlie. I think I'm kind of
rambling now, but um
yeah,
so I felt uh
I think I felt some relief today that
they caught this guy, if that's the guy
that did it. I didn't get to read a ton
about it,
but there's still this bigger feeling of
um
like what
happens, what stage is safe, what place
is safe to stand up and share how you
feel or to share something.
>> Yeah, good questions, man. And just this
whole thing was genuine. And I don't
know about you guys, but I needed to
view a conversation like this instead of
just getting in all the weeds about how
close someone was to Charlie or whether
Israel was involved. All those
questions, you know, are important. We
need to consider everything regarding
stories like this, how monumental this
story is and the ramifications for our
society and people that knew Charlie and
his Charlie's political adversaries. We
needed to know a lot of angles of the
story, but just reflecting in a human
way like Theo did here, I think is
awesome. I I really enjoyed this. I took
a lot from this and just seeing his
viewpoint about thinking about the grand
things revolving around this that aren't
necessarily political or aren't
necessarily based on culture, but just
really inward introspective thoughts.
And I think we could all behoove
ourselves to see that kind of content
sometimes. It actually helps me quite a
bit. I like his podcast quite a bit
because he's not the typical political
podcaster. He's kind of a a Joe Blow
everyday American even though I mean
he's rich beyond belief probably, right?
But he is uh he is so because he comes
off that way I think very accurately
from what I've seen. But I do want to
hear from you. What were you thinking?
What is your biggest takeaway from this
assassination? What's the most horrible
aspect of it? Is there anything that you
think's been glossed over in all these
narratives? If even if it goes down to
the most human level, let me know in the
comments down below. Also, please like
my video and subscribe to my channel.
Subscribe to Theo2 also. Great podcast.
I really like that guy. And please
consider becoming a YouTube member. So,
if you click the join button below, you
can help support my channel. And then in
return, I'll give you access to all my
membersonly videos before they go live
to the general public on my channel. And
until I see you guys next time, no more
war, no more debt, no more inflation,
and no more empire. Peace out, guys.