John Mearsheimer Exposed Charlie Kirk's Turn Against Israel and Netanyahu's Scramble to Avoid Blame

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Max Blumenthal Exposes Charlie Kirk's Final 48 Hours and His Break from Pro-Israel Cause

Max Blumenthal Exposes Charlie Kirk's Final 48 Hours and His Break from Pro-Israel Cause

20:39

Dave Smith and Ian Carroll Break Down Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories and Israel Connections

Dave Smith and Ian Carroll Break Down Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories and Israel Connections

2:44:31

Dave Smith Reveals Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu: Wrestling With Israel Support

Dave Smith Reveals Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu: Wrestling With Israel Support

21:35

John Mearsheimer Exposed Charlie Kirk's Turn Against Israel and Netanyahu's Scramble to Avoid Blame

John Mearsheimer breaks down the mounting evidence that Charlie Kirk fundamentally changed his position on Israel and US-Israeli relations before his death. Between high-pressure meetings with billionaire donors, private conversations expressing fear of Netanyahu, and public frustrations about being attacked for criticizing Israeli policy, Kirk appeared caught between his wealthy Zionist backers and a younger conservative base increasingly skeptical of Israel. Mearsheimer explains why Netanyahu issued two separate statements denying Israeli involvement, examines Israel's reputation for political assassinations, and reveals how Kirk's shift mirrors a broader generational change in conservative attitudes toward the US-Israel relationship.

September 18, 2025

Netanyahu Issues Unprecedented Double Denial

John Mearsheimer analyzes why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went on international television before Charlie Kirk's killer had been caught to deny Israeli involvement in his death. Mearsheimer notes that Netanyahu issued not one but two statements distancing Israel from Kirk's assassination, with the second emphasizing that Israel and Charlie Kirk were "the best of friends" and had "absolutely nothing to do with Charlie Kirk's death."

Bill Aman, a mainstream supporter of Israel who had been putting pressure on Charlie Kirk, also released a statement claiming he had "nothing but the highest respect for Charlie Kirk" and describing a "very positive meeting" with him. According to Mearsheimer, both the lobby and Netanyahu are scrambling to avoid blame for this event.

Israel's Reputation for Political Assassinations

Mearsheimer explains that Israel's reputation for assassinations is so extensive that Wikipedia had to break down their documented assassinations by decade because the list involves so many names. He identifies three major events in American history where conspiracy theories involve Israeli participation: the JFK assassination, 9/11, and now the Charlie Kirk killing.

With JFK, Kirk had tried to stop Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons through the Dimona project in the 1960s, with communications between Kennedy and David Ben-Gurion substantiating these claims just months before his death. Kennedy also attempted to force the American Zionist Council, the precursor to AIPAC, to register as a foreign lobby.

Regarding 9/11, Mearsheimer references the "dancing Israelis" incident, where a group of Israelis, some belonging to Israeli intelligence under the guise of a moving company, were filmed celebrating the attacks. They were detained and then released, with mainstream media dismissing questions as conspiracy theories. Tucker Carlson is reportedly producing a five-part series on 9/11 that will argue Israeli involvement.

Max Blumenthal's Reporting on Kirk's Final Days

While Mearsheimer initially suggested that Max Blumenthal argued for Israeli involvement in Kirk's murder, he clarifies that Blumenthal's reporting actually focused on the pressures Charlie Kirk was feeling. Blumenthal documented that Kirk had come to believe Netanyahu was a bully and that high-profile, wealthy donors were pressuring him to align more closely with Israel and "essentially become Ben Shapiro again" on Israeli issues. However, Blumenthal's piece explicitly states there is no evidence of an Israeli government role in Kirk's assassination.

According to Blumenthal's reporting, based on conversations with sources including someone present at the meeting with Aman and someone in the White House, Aman's people offered Charlie Kirk a tremendous amount of money, reportedly upwards of $150 million, if he would begin saying favorable things about Netanyahu. When Kirk refused, Aman invited him to his home on Long Island where they applied coercive pressure, which Kirk also refused.

Kirk's Growing Frustrations With Pro-Israel Pressure

About a month before his death, Charlie Kirk appeared on the Megyn Kelly show expressing frustration about the pressure he was facing. He stated: "The people that are attacking me are in a hyper paranoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white. I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government without backlash than actual Israelis do. The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, you're going to weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues."

Kirk told friends and colleagues in the weeks and days before his murder that he was afraid for his life and that he couldn't stand and didn't trust Netanyahu. Harrison Smith reported that an unnamed friend of Charlie Kirk said Kirk was afraid Israel would kill him, a post Smith made in August before Kirk was shot.

Netanyahu's Response and Omissions

In his video statement, Netanyahu invoked Joseph Goebbels, saying "the bigger the lie, the faster it will spread," and called accusations of Israeli involvement "a monstrous big lie." He claimed Charlie Kirk "loved Israel" and "loved the Jewish people," citing a letter Kirk sent him months earlier where Kirk wrote: "One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances with Jews to protect Judeo-Christian civilization."

Netanyahu said Kirk encouraged him "to make the case directly to the American people about how vital Israel is to US national security" and noted that Kirk told him "The Holy Land is so important to my life, it pains me to see support for Israel slip away." Netanyahu added that he had invited Kirk to visit Israel again shortly before his death.

However, Netanyahu omitted key details. According to unnamed sources, Kirk turned down the Israel trip invitation. He also failed to mention that Kirk denounced what was happening in Gaza in the same letter he referenced. Sources close to Kirk reported that he viewed Netanyahu as manipulative and a bully, and was frustrated that Netanyahu was essentially dictating presidential personnel decisions, surrounding the administration with hardcore Zionists like Keith Kellogg, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Mike Waltz, and Kash Patel.

Kirk's Shifting Position on Israel

Mearsheimer argues that what was happening with Charlie Kirk, which is very well documented, is that he was changing his mind in a fundamental way on Israel and Israel's role inside the United States. Kirk had been at one point super supportive of Israel, but he began to change his mind. Tucker Carlson released a video discussing his conversations with Charlie Kirk that tell the same story as Max Blumenthal's reporting.

However, the full picture is more nuanced. Kirk was uniquely positioned in the conservative movement, having to thread the needle between wealthy Zionist donors like Bill Aman and Seth Dillon who wanted him to toe the line on Israel, and a young activist base on college campuses. Young people, even conservative young people, are not nearly as pro-Israel as their parents, and every poll confirms this generational shift.

Kirk's events reflected this tension. He had Tucker Carlson speak at a recent event, where Carlson stated it wasn't anti-Semitic to criticize Israel and suggested Jeffrey Epstein was probably working for Israel. Kirk also hosted a debate between Dave Smith and Josh Hammer, where Smith received a more positive reception than Zionist Hammer at a Young Conservatives event, signaling where the barometer of young conservatives is shifting on Israel.

Yet even late in his life, on July 29th, Kirk posted hardcore Zionist propaganda denying that starvation was happening in Gaza as a deliberate government campaign, calling it "Hamas propaganda." In his August interview with Megyn Kelly, while expressing frustration with pro-Israel pressure, he also aligned with Kelly in promoting Hasbara talking points about not trusting pictures from Gaza because "Gazans are propagandists" and "Hamas would want nothing more to show that kids are starving."

Why Conspiracy Theories Flourish

Mearsheimer identifies two key problems Netanyahu faces. First, almost everyone believes Netanyahu lies constantly, a perception that exists in Israel as well as the United States. When he claims he's telling the truth and others are lying, it's not an argument that sells well.

Second, the Israelis run around the world assassinating people on what appears to be a daily basis. When someone like Charlie Kirk or JFK gets assassinated, it doesn't take much for people to link Israel to those assassinations. In a world where it's very hard to tell what the truth is and most people think the government lies to them, it's very easy for conspiracy theories to take root. When thinking about assassinations, the first country that comes to mind is Israel, and that's the fundamental problem Netanyahu faces.

Implications for US-Israeli Relations

Mearsheimer argues that Israel isn't vital to US national security but is actually destructive of it. He goes further, stating it's reaching the point where the relationship is destructive of American liberal democracy as well. Many people in recent years have begun to rethink how they view Israel and Israel's relationship with the United States, a shift that Charlie Kirk appeared to be experiencing.

The question remains whether this incident will turn more people away from Israel as they learn about the pressures Kirk faced, his fears about Netanyahu, and the broader pattern of Israeli influence in American politics. Netanyahu's need to issue two separate denials and blame "radical Islamists" before any suspect was even apprehended suggests deep concern about Israel's reputation and the growing skepticism among Americans, particularly younger conservatives, about the US-Israel relationship.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!