David Sacks on Tulsi Gabbard's DNI Appointment and the Deep State's Endless War Agenda

[00:00] joining us now is David saaks from the

[00:01] all-in podcast David I enjoyed hanging

[00:03] out with you uh this last weekend David

[00:06] and I are uh trying to fulfill the

[00:08] Mandate together is that fair to say

[00:10] David uh that was that was a really fun

[00:12] dinner and um we'll just leave it at

[00:14] that we want to make sure that the

[00:17] warmongers and the neoconservatives uh

[00:20] remain where they belong which is in the

[00:21] losing campaign of kamla Harris David I

[00:23] want to take a Victory lap with you

[00:24] first how big is the Tulsi gabard

[00:27] appointment for Director of National

[00:29] inent

[00:30] Ence I think it's extremely important

[00:32] it's extremely important for the country

[00:34] and it's extremely important for our

[00:36] movement if I had to identify one risk

[00:39] to the magum movement over the next four

[00:41] years it would be that somehow the Deep

[00:43] State or the swamp or the Washington

[00:45] blob Maneuvers president Trump into

[00:48] another Forever War a war that we don't

[00:50] need and that war would not only be very

[00:53] damaging to the country but it would

[00:55] fracture our base and it could destroy

[00:57] the magum movement and derail domestic

[01:00] priorities so you know an unnecessary

[01:03] war is the last thing we need and recall

[01:05] that it was bad intelligence that got us

[01:07] into the Iraq war in the first place

[01:09] remember that it was the CIA director

[01:11] George Tennant who told President George

[01:13] W bush that it was a slam dunk case that

[01:16] Saddam Hussein had WD programs and it

[01:19] was on that basis that the United States

[01:21] got into its most pointless and

[01:23] destructive Forever War so it's so

[01:26] important that the intelligence that is

[01:28] given to the president is correct and I

[01:30] can't think of a better person to be in

[01:32] charge of that than Tulsi because she

[01:35] has worn the uniform she's a soldier she

[01:37] know what what's involved at the T same

[01:40] time she's had a skepticism towards

[01:42] these unnecessary foreign interventions

[01:44] and so she has the right balance I think

[01:46] she can make sure the Intel is correct

[01:48] and hopefully that will avoid this uh

[01:50] horrible type of risk that I'm talking

[01:53] about without a doubt and David they're

[01:55] already smearing Tulsi as being a

[01:57] Russian asset where does this come from

[02:00] I mean it is a demonstrably false slur

[02:03] it is the same as calling somebody a

[02:05] racist or a bigot it's it's the National

[02:08] Security equivalent of calling somebody

[02:09] a racist is calling somebody a Russian

[02:12] asset in in politics they'll say you are

[02:15] a racist if you try to get into The

[02:17] National Security space you're a Russian

[02:18] asset it it that slurp perfectly shows

[02:22] why we need a tear down David even on

[02:25] the most generous reading where the heck

[02:27] does this come from with Tulsi do they

[02:29] call her a Russian asset because she

[02:31] dares to critique the international

[02:32] rules-based neoliberal order that has

[02:34] been a failure the last 30 years well it

[02:37] comes from the exact same source that

[02:40] this the exact same smear came from

[02:42] about President Trump remember they said

[02:43] that he was an agent of Vladimir Putin

[02:45] for years I mean this was the whole

[02:46] Russia gate hoax where did the Russia

[02:48] gate hoax C come from it came from the

[02:50] Hillary Clinton campaign who started the

[02:52] smear that tulsy was a Russian agent

[02:54] Hillary Clinton she just asserted it on

[02:57] cable news one day without any evidence

[03:00] and since then it's just been repeated

[03:02] again without any evidence whatsoever I

[03:04] think it's even worse than calling

[03:05] somebody racist as horrible as that is

[03:08] because you know as as bad as it is to

[03:11] to engage in racism that's not actually

[03:13] a crime whereas being a traitor to your

[03:15] country is actually a crime it's a

[03:18] potential death penalty offense so this

[03:20] is the possibly the worst type of smear

[03:23] that they could ever make towards

[03:24] somebody especially somebody who proudly

[03:27] wears the uniform of of the USA I think

[03:30] the good news is that the people of the

[03:31] United States have now seen through this

[03:34] type of slander obviously they saw

[03:36] through with respect to president Trump

[03:38] and I think president Trump's election

[03:40] shows that the mainstream media that or

[03:42] I should say the Legacy Media no longer

[03:45] has any credibility when it makes these

[03:47] types of assertions and in a sense

[03:49] president Trump has short circuited

[03:52] their slander

[03:55] machine so let's let's play some of the

[03:58] tape here this is Tom Nichols who is

[04:00] obviously on payroll from the cental in

[04:02] Central Intelligence Agency there's a

[04:04] remarkable

[04:06] lie let's play Cut

[04:09] 47 you know every federal employee every

[04:12] year has to sit through um Insider

[04:14] threat training uh to recognize people

[04:17] they think might be um hazards around

[04:20] classified material and part of that is

[04:23] you know people who are deeply critical

[04:25] of the United States and it's and its

[04:27] foreign policy who seem to have a lot of

[04:29] Affinity um and meetings with um foreign

[04:33] Nationals I mean there's all kinds of

[04:35] alarm bells that go off here um and this

[04:40] nomination um sets sets them all

[04:43] off whoa whoa whoa whoa hold on hold I

[04:46] if you're critical of America red flag

[04:48] did he say that if you're critical of

[04:49] our foreign policy decisions David Sachs

[04:52] did you hear that that was a very

[04:55] interesting tell that if you have a

[04:56] difference of opinion on whether or not

[04:59] we send money to Ukraine and we invade

[05:01] Iraq you're a national security threat

[05:03] did I hear that correctly well this this

[05:06] is what they want to redefine treason as

[05:09] is policy disagreements if you don't

[05:12] agree with their agenda somehow that's

[05:14] treason no I mean that's that's that's

[05:15] engaging in uh a reasonable policy

[05:18] debate which we absolutely need to have

[05:20] especially with regard to Foreign Wars

[05:22] look what these people are so upset

[05:23] about it to she does not uh represent a

[05:26] threat to the United States uh I think

[05:28] she's a great asset for the United

[05:30] States what she represents a threat to

[05:32] is the Atlantic Magazine's agenda which

[05:34] is non-stop War it's endless and Forever

[05:36] War this is what the Atlantic magazine

[05:38] stands for and they have made these same

[05:41] types of accusations towards president

[05:43] Trump they again they bought into the

[05:44] whole Russia gate hook hookline and

[05:46] sinker they're the ones who spread it or

[05:48] were some of the people who spread it in

[05:50] fact I think the Eder in Chief of the

[05:52] Atlantic Jeffrey gold uh Jeffrey

[05:54] Goldberg was one of the main promoters

[05:56] of the whole Russia gate hoax they've

[05:58] never come to grips with their

[06:01] complicity in that hoax they've never

[06:03] acknowledged that they were wrong they

[06:05] just move on to the next set of

[06:07] accusations and these are the last

[06:08] people who should be believed about this

[06:10] sort of thing they have no credibility

[06:12] left yeah it's just not just no

[06:14] credibility I mean like they're the ones

[06:16] that are hostile threat to the country

[06:17] the way they're talking