Evidence of planning the Kirk assassination or meaningless hype?- Clip

[00:00] Gigi's wigging out. Gigi, if it's CIA

[00:03] bark, let me know.

[00:07] >> Information is the oxygen of the

[00:09] democracy.

[00:10] >> There's so much evidence out there that

[00:12] even if less than 1% is true,

[00:15] that will be enough to collapse the

[00:17] current paradigm and change the whole

[00:20] planet.

[00:26] I've been watching Baron Coleman's

[00:28] streams for like the last

[00:30] 20 hours or something catching up

[00:33] because I had seen his work here. Let me

[00:35] go to his channel. I had seen his work

[00:38] um you know being reported on by like

[00:40] James Lee and uh Redacted and all these

[00:42] other places and it's like legit. Um and

[00:44] I get it and so I never really went to

[00:46] his stream and actually watched the

[00:47] whole stream because I it's a lot of

[00:49] time. But it eventually caught up to me

[00:51] that like I should probably catch up

[00:52] with what Baron's doing and see what's

[00:53] going on here. And I've now watched

[00:55] almost all of every single video except

[00:57] for one of them.

[00:59] And what I realized

[01:02] is that someone's got to put this

[01:03] onto a timeline and figure out when all

[01:07] these searches were happening relative

[01:09] to the Charlie Kirk timeline, the TPUSA

[01:13] timeline. what's happening in the world

[01:15] while all these really weird Google

[01:17] searches are being done in Israel and

[01:20] Washington DC and probably the FBI

[01:23] office in Huntsville, Alabama. So, I

[01:26] built that um and I went through all of

[01:28] his videos and tabulated all of the

[01:30] relevant Google search trends that he's

[01:32] found and put it on a timeline that

[01:35] paints a pretty striking picture. If you

[01:38] have not if you somehow have been living

[01:40] under a rock and have not seen this

[01:41] dude's face and not seen what this dude

[01:43] is reporting on um

[01:46] I don't know where you've been but

[01:51] um we'll catch you up. I'll give you the

[01:52] fast version because the tough part when

[01:54] people's information is hidden within a

[01:57] live stream there's a huge time

[01:59] investment required to dig it out and to

[02:01] put it all together. and Baron's

[02:03] investigation has been going on for a

[02:05] month now over many live streams that

[02:08] build on each other and you kind of have

[02:09] to watch them all in order to really get

[02:11] the context of what he's talking about.

[02:13] I highly recommend you do that. I right

[02:15] now I would recommend it's easy. You

[02:17] have a computer in front of you right

[02:18] now. I would recommend you open a new

[02:20] YouTube tab, search for Baron Coleman,

[02:22] and go and subscribe to him right this

[02:24] minute because his shit's fire. He's

[02:27] really interesting. He's got a great

[02:28] mind on this. Um, and he's bringing some

[02:30] of the most concrete facts, not like

[02:34] it's proving anything about like that

[02:36] person did it, but concrete facts about

[02:38] things that did happen that are

[02:40] extremely suspicious, that are digital,

[02:43] that is a digital footprint of what

[02:45] looks an awful lot like the planning of

[02:48] an assassination, happening before the

[02:51] assassination.

[02:53] And so, I just want to introduce you to

[02:54] him a little bit so you can get a feel

[02:55] for who he is and how this works. and we

[02:57] can show you the tool that he's using to

[02:59] to grab this data and evidence. And then

[03:02] we'll skip ahead and we rather than

[03:04] watching, you know, the 15 hours of live

[03:06] streams or whatever that I spent the

[03:07] last two days watching, we'll skip ahead

[03:09] from there to some of the more

[03:11] significant ones and kind of put it all

[03:12] together quickly so you can understand

[03:14] how groundbreaking this stuff is. Um, so

[03:17] I just want to go to his intro

[03:20] real quick and let him speak his own. I

[03:23] don't want it to be painful. I want this

[03:24] as painless as possible, but I didn't

[03:27] know how else to get this information

[03:29] out into the public, and I think it is

[03:30] disturbing enough that it needs to be

[03:32] out in the public. It is uh frankly one

[03:35] of the more disturbing things I've run

[03:36] across. But let me give you the

[03:37] background of how I did this.

[03:40] There's a there's a search function in

[03:41] Google I learned about years ago.

[03:44] And everybody knows how to use you open

[03:46] google.com and you can you can uh you

[03:49] get a search window and you start typing

[03:50] in your stuff. A lot of it's a de a lot

[03:52] of you have it as the default browser.

[03:54] So you just go up to your where you

[03:55] would normally type like uh

[03:57] baronolman.com or

[03:58] >> use Brave browser folks. Brave browser

[04:00] way better for your privacy. Way better

[04:02] platform.

[04:03] >> Whatever you would uh you go up there

[04:04] and you just start typing something, you

[04:06] know, uh closest grocery store and it'll

[04:08] pop up a Google search because Google is

[04:09] your default search engine. Uh, but if

[04:13] you actually go to the google.com page,

[04:15] it'll give you a search window, but

[04:16] there are a whole lot of functionality

[04:17] you can do in that search window that

[04:19] most people don't know about. And the

[04:21] reason I'm confident most people don't

[04:22] know about it is when I ran by several

[04:26] very sophisticated, again, household

[04:28] names in some instances, uh, names that

[04:30] have people that have advised

[04:32] presidents, uh, advised uh, on on mega

[04:36] national

[04:37] matters and instances.

[04:41] And I said, "Hey, have you ever heard of

[04:43] this search functionality in Google

[04:44] called Google Trends?"

[04:46] And several of them were like, "No,

[04:47] never heard of it. What is it? What does

[04:48] it do?" Some of them were like, "I kind

[04:50] of heard of it, but I don't really know

[04:51] what it was." I first heard of it when I

[04:53] was advising for a grocery store chain

[04:54] decade and a half ago, probably a long

[04:57] time ago. And uh I was a very small

[05:00] member of a team, but I was part of a

[05:01] team and the and the team had a very

[05:03] sophisticated guy on it. and he had

[05:04] discovered this functionality on Google

[05:06] where you could go and you could sort of

[05:07] view what it was people were searching

[05:09] and when and you could get

[05:11] >> makes a lot of sense why this tool would

[05:12] be useful for a grocery store chain

[05:14] >> trends related to it and so I'll

[05:16] demonstrate that for you on something

[05:18] random but it'll and I'll give you an

[05:20] idea of how it works and then I'll

[05:21] explain where I first applied this to

[05:23] any sort of breaking national story and

[05:25] then I'll explain how I applied it to

[05:27] Charlie Kirk and then I'll explain

[05:30] one of the most disturbing things I've

[05:32] come across in a very very long Okay.

[05:35] Um, so that's Baron. He's dope. And he

[05:38] says it a million times in his streams.

[05:40] Um, so I'm just going to say it for him

[05:41] right now. He is not making the claim

[05:43] that what we're about to talk about is

[05:45] proof of any specific guilt from any

[05:47] specific person. He's not claiming that

[05:48] like this is going to show you who who

[05:50] killed Charlie Kirk or who was it that

[05:52] was looking these things up. He's just

[05:54] showing you that this is what it is and

[05:56] it means what it means. So let's let's

[05:58] meet the tool Google Trends. Oh, you're

[06:01] getting a sneak peek. Um, so Google

[06:05] Trends tracks

[06:07] all of Google's searches all over the

[06:10] world all the time and you can pull that

[06:14] data in various ways. And so earlier

[06:16] today, um, just as an example for the I

[06:19] have never done this before about two or

[06:21] three hours ago. Um, as an example, it's

[06:23] like you can search yourself and see how

[06:25] many people are searching for you.

[06:28] And in the past day in the United

[06:30] States,

[06:32] there's two hits, two spikes

[06:36] at 1:28 p.m. and at 2:24 p.m. Uh, right

[06:41] before I went live earlier. Interesting.

[06:44] Um, all across the United States, just

[06:47] in the past day. If I expand it to the

[06:49] past seven days, um, because I'm

[06:51] relatively a public figure, there's, you

[06:53] know, some Google searches for me.

[06:56] What we are seeing on this chart is

[06:58] important to understand. The scale is 0

[07:00] to 100 on the left. And that doesn't

[07:03] mean zero searches, 100 searches. It

[07:07] means that in the time frame you're

[07:10] looking at, one of those days has the

[07:12] most searches. And here that is this

[07:15] day, October 24th.

[07:18] Today.

[07:20] Oh, because it's breaking up by

[07:22] timeline. So whatever time frame you

[07:24] choose, it'll segment that into time

[07:26] sections and then whichever time section

[07:28] has the most hits that becomes 100%. And

[07:32] then every other day is relative to the

[07:35] big day. So in this case if on this day

[07:38] October 20 if right here in this time

[07:40] frame I got 100 Google searches then all

[07:44] the others are relative to that time

[07:46] frame of 100. And so 21% means 21 out of

[07:49] 100 searches. If I expand my time frame

[07:52] to 90 days, the whole scale resets and

[07:54] now this is the biggest day, September

[07:56] 29th, 2025, that's the day out of this

[08:00] time frame, 90 days, where there were

[08:02] the most people Google searching me in

[08:04] the United States. And so all the other

[08:06] data points here are September 26, 54%

[08:11] of this biggest day. Okay, that's what

[08:14] this means. And you can look at it in

[08:17] all kinds of ways. U across whatever

[08:19] time frame you want. Um so over the last

[08:22] year, it's kind of interesting. I had

[08:24] the most Google searches March 2nd to

[08:26] March 8th of 2025. I don't remember what

[08:29] I was doing, but I'm sure I was causing

[08:30] trouble somewhere. Um then you can

[08:33] change it to be like in New York State.

[08:37] How many people are Google searching

[08:38] Ian? Interesting. It's that same time

[08:40] frame, March 2nd to March 8th. If anyone

[08:43] remembers in the chat what I was doing

[08:44] March 2nd through March 8th, let me know

[08:47] because I was probably starting trouble.

[08:48] I was probably talking to Elon or

[08:50] something like that, I would guess. Um,

[08:53] California,

[08:57] right? So, each different location with

[08:59] each different time frame will sort of

[09:01] yield a different window into it, but

[09:03] it's not terribly granular. You can't

[09:05] tell who's searching it. You can't tell

[09:07] exactly where it's coming from. Um, and

[09:10] you can't tell exactly how many searches

[09:11] it is. And with someone that's a public

[09:13] figure, it's not all that helpful in

[09:14] this context because there's going to be

[09:16] a lot of Google searches for someone in

[09:18] my position or for someone even more

[09:20] popular or famous than me. And so you

[09:22] got to take the tool for its own

[09:23] limitations is what it is. But it is all

[09:26] real data. It is all actual searches

[09:29] that actually happen. And if there is

[09:30] data on these charts, those were real

[09:33] searches.

[09:35] And so I wonder if it'll still show up

[09:37] because earlier today, just for the

[09:40] funny of it, I was like, you can also

[09:42] search internationally, right? And so

[09:43] over the past 12 months in Israel,

[09:46] there's no significant data to show that

[09:49] people in Israel are searching for Ian

[09:50] Carol. Thank God. Thank God. But then I

[09:54] reduced the time frame to 30 days and to

[09:56] 60 days, and I was like, cool, nothing's

[09:57] showing up. Nothing's showing up.

[09:58] Nothing's showing up.

[10:00] Um, and on one of the time frames, it

[10:02] showed me a little blip. And so I opened

[10:04] up the 7-day time frame and noticed that

[10:08] in Israel there are searches for me on

[10:10] October 20th at 11 p.m. and October 21st

[10:14] at 5 a.m.

[10:17] And it might just be a few searches. It

[10:19] might just be like four Google searches

[10:20] and one Google search kind of a thing.

[10:22] Although 21% doesn't really equal 1/4,

[10:25] but you know what I'm saying. So on

[10:28] October 20th, someone was searching for

[10:30] me in Israel. What was I doing on

[10:32] October 20th? I don't know. Maybe I was

[10:37] This is actually a slightly different

[10:38] day than we honed in on earlier. Um

[10:42] because it can be a little shifty as far

[10:44] as what

[10:46] six days ago.

[10:48] Yeah. So October 20th was two days after

[10:51] my last Free Speech Friday.

[10:54] Two days after I did this whole live

[10:57] free speech Friday about the Israeli

[10:59] propaganda machine and about all the

[11:01] Jewish donors and about all the

[11:03] organizations they have and their

[11:05] skirting of Farara. It was a very

[11:07] critical stream, let's just say. And so

[11:10] maybe it's a coincidence, but my best

[11:12] guess would be that people in Israel

[11:14] were probably Google searching me

[11:15] because they were not exactly stoked

[11:17] about the live stream that I had done.

[11:19] And I'm not saying that like MSAD was

[11:20] Google searching me. I'm just saying

[11:21] that people in Israel were Google

[11:23] searching me and maybe they're just

[11:24] regular civilians that are just curious.

[11:26] Maybe they're hyped. Maybe they're

[11:28] homies that are in the chat right now.

[11:29] Um or maybe they were people like that

[11:32] don't like me. Um who knows? You can

[11:35] only ascribe as much as you can ascribe

[11:36] to it. And it's really all speculation

[11:38] beyond the fact that Google searches

[11:40] happened. Okay, that's layer one

[11:47] of this idea a very long time. And I

[11:50] just go

[11:51] >> and Baron

[11:52] walks us slowly into this idea like I

[11:55] did where he shows us he used the

[11:57] Atlanta Braves as a basic search to show

[11:59] what trend lines tend to look like and

[12:01] why you can't use this technique on big

[12:05] things that are popular that get lots of

[12:07] Google searches. You have to use it on

[12:08] things like someone's full name or an

[12:11] address or, you know, stuff like that.

[12:15] Um,

[12:19] so then he searched Tyler James

[12:21] Robinson,

[12:23] which is Tyler Robinson's full name.

[12:24] Most of us don't know Tyler Robinson's

[12:26] full name, but it is Tyler James

[12:28] Robinson.

[12:28] >> Tyler James Robinson. So, I did a search

[12:30] for Tyler James Robinson nationally over

[12:33] the entire United States for the past

[12:34] seven days. And you'll notice the

[12:37] gigantic spike right after the news

[12:38] broke. But I noticed right over here

[12:39] there was a little blip on September 9th

[12:40] at 7 p.m.

[12:43] Damn, that's weird. That is weird.

[12:45] >> And keep in mind, this is a blip large

[12:47] enough to show up

[12:49] on a on an index at a two. Now, granted,

[12:52] I'm going to keep going. You're going to

[12:53] be surprised by what I've show you here

[12:54] in a few minutes. It's a blip large

[12:56] enough to show up as a two the day

[13:00] before the Kirk shooting. The day before

[13:02] the Kirk shooting, someone in the United

[13:03] States searched Tyler James Robinson,

[13:06] the full name, first, middle, last name

[13:08] of the shooter. Now, what's interesting

[13:09] about that is I've not seen him listed

[13:10] anywhere as Tyler James Robinson. I've

[13:12] seen Tyler Robinson a lot. I've seen his

[13:15] name, his mom's name. I think her name

[13:17] was Amber.

[13:18] >> Okay. So, not going to sit around and

[13:21] watch the whole thing. Um, I recommend

[13:23] that you do go watch the whole thing.

[13:25] Um, because he gets into more granular

[13:26] detail and he looks up different

[13:29] locations and he hones in and he he also

[13:31] looks for other locations where there is

[13:32] no data and he shows you that. And so

[13:34] the granularity of watching his whole

[13:35] stream is important because you get the

[13:37] context that it's not ju he's not just

[13:39] like cherrypicking random things and

[13:41] being like look there's a crazy trend.

[13:43] He's looking all over and he's showing

[13:44] you that like no it's just searched in

[13:47] this one place at this one time not

[13:49] anywhere else not any other time. That's

[13:51] weird. And what he realizes is that

[13:54] Tyler James Robinson was searched the

[13:56] day before the shooting in the United

[13:58] States. and he hones in on realizing

[14:00] that Tyler James Robinson was searched

[14:01] in Washington DC at 12:00 p.m. the day

[14:04] before the shooting. And he was searched

[14:06] in Huntsville, Alabama at 4 p.m. the day

[14:08] before the shooting. And Huntsville,

[14:09] Alabama is a weird place, but he knows

[14:11] from his time looking into Thomas

[14:13] Matthew Krooks, which is where he first

[14:14] started applying this technique to

[14:17] crimes like this to high-profile cases.

[14:20] He knows that in Huntsville, Alabama,

[14:22] there's an enormous FBI field office.

[14:25] And so Huntsville, Alabama shows a lot

[14:27] of blips on a lot of searches that he

[14:28] winds up doing. And then also the

[14:30] District of Columbia at 900 p.m. there

[14:32] was a huge signal. And that is not

[14:36] what's on screen there. That's District

[14:38] of Columbia.

[14:40] District of Columbia.

[14:42] And then he shows Oh, then he's on to

[14:46] something else. I must have skipped over

[14:48] it. Um,

[14:50] so

[14:52] that's the technique that's being used

[14:53] here. And this is just the start. Tyler

[14:56] James Robinson is just the start.

[14:59] That would be enough to collapse the

[15:01] current paradigm and change the whole

[15:04] planet.