The Pharmaceutical Industry's Wealth Extraction System
After spending more than a decade in national pharmaceutical litigation, one expert gained unprecedented access to corporate computer hard drives from executives and scientists, revealing how the system actually works. The healthcare system has become a golden goose for large corporations, with enormous amounts of money flowing through political contributions, public relations campaigns, and payments to doctors. Despite litigation resulting in money changing hands and injured parties receiving settlements, the fundamental structure remains unchanged.
The drug companies' realized purpose is simply to extract as much money from American society as possible. Litigation hasn't changed this basic reality. States received settlements for opioid damage, but the extraction system continues unabated. This expert dropped out of litigation specifically because it wasn't creating genuine reform, only transferring money while leaving the corrupt structure intact.
The only path out of this situation requires Americans to become educated about the problem so that the power of voting citizens becomes greater than the power of drug company political contributions and lobbying. Without mass education leading to informed action, genuine reform remains impossible. The American people must understand how deeply compromised the system has become before they can create the political will necessary for structural change.
The Megalomaniacs' Population Control Agenda
At UN summits, the agenda is discussed openly without any attempt at concealment. Global elites are obsessed with the idea that there are too many people on this planet, that humans are consuming too many resources and represent a cancer on the earth. They believe the ideal population would be somewhere between 500 million and perhaps a billion people. With the emergence of artificial intelligence and robotics, many now think even that number is far too high.
If these megalomaniacs succeed in building their one world political and economic system, many people simply won't wake up. They state this clearly and openly. Those who do survive can look forward to a future of slavery where all decisions are made for them. Basic decisions that previously would never have been considered candidates for government control—who to marry, what kind of family to have, how many children to have, what kind of work to do, what to study—would all be determined by the system.
A century ago, technocrats justified this under the guise of efficiency. Today they use sustainability as a buzzword to justify tyranny. The result is the same: loss of autonomy, sovereignty, and liberty. To the extent people are allowed to operate and exist at all, it will be as a means to an end—empowering and enriching those at the top. Personal and economic decisions will be removed from individual control. Entertainment and drugs will be ubiquitous, creating a miserable existence for the masses.
Fear as a Control Mechanism
Fear serves as a powerful mechanism of control. When people are scared of overpopulation, disease, or other threats, they become willing to accept ideas they never would have accepted before. In communist China, authorities don't even need to convince people—they simply point guns, force compliance, throw dissidents into re-education camps, or harvest their organs. China has dispensed entirely with pretense.
Even in the Western world, the progress made through fear is alarming. This has been accomplished through a combination of dumbing down the population, indoctrinating the population, and terrorizing the population. While there remains hope they won't ultimately succeed, they are making substantial progress toward their goals.
The Media's Corruption and Complicity
The primary incentives media personalities respond to are prestige and money. Unfortunately, just like in other professions, most people will sell out their principles and their fellow human beings for money and prestige. This is painfully clear in the media world. The people paid the most in media are those who have sold out their nations, sold out the truth, and served as propagandists for evildoers, in many cases consciously and deliberately.
At UN conferences, thousands of so-called journalists function as a cheerleading section. When a Chinese communist comes out to announce a climate agreement that will supposedly save the world, these journalists rise like trained seals to give standing ovations. They ask no real questions, displaying a level of complicity that is disgraceful.
The situation has become so bad that some real journalists hesitate to identify their profession when asked. They worry people will assume they're one of the nasty, lying, dishonest propagandists that have become enemies of the people. A recent poll found that 60% of Americans regard the media as enemies of the people. While that phrase evokes communist China and the Soviet Union, the reality is that American media has largely earned this designation. They actively want to hurt citizens, selling them out, destroying their country and families, and constantly lying.
Encouragingly, some solid voices continue doing real journalism, digging out information and working to disseminate it. However, the system is doing everything possible to silence these voices through various means. Some journalists are murdered outright. Gary Webb, who exposed CIA involvement in cocaine trafficking, supposedly committed suicide by shooting himself twice in the head. Michael Hastings from Rolling Stone supposedly crashed his car into a tree at 100 miles per hour, after which intelligence agency heads stated they had the technology to make that happen—not that they didn't do it, but that they could have. These incidents serve as messages: touch certain stories and bad things will happen to you.
Sustainable Development Goals and Communist Ideology
The UN's sustainable development goals align closely with the planks and plans of the communist movement since the 1920s. In 1963, the 45 plans of international communism were read into the Congressional record. One plan called for instituting the United Nations as the savior of all nations and getting everyone on board with UN directives. The 2030 agenda is all about establishing the United Nations as the one global authority that will dictate everything.
All 17 sustainable development goals fall completely in line with what Karl Marx wrote in the Communist Manifesto. The agriculture plans mirror everything Marx wrote about agriculture. The medicine plans mirror what communists have been implementing with universal healthcare since the 1950s. The equity and redistribution of wealth components are all part of Marx's plan. At their core, the sustainable development goals are communist goals.
The Vatican's Troubling Embrace of Global Agenda
In 2014, Pope Francis met with Ban Ki-moon and Jeffrey Sachs about the UN's sustainable development goals. In that meeting, Pope Francis committed the entire Catholic Church to the sustainable development goals. Since then, he has given numerous statements and calls for implementing these goals every single year.
One year after committing the Church to this agenda, Pope Francis promulgated an encyclical called Laudato Si, which makes 28 references to sustainable development and calls for adoption and implementation of the sustainable development goals. He has made this globalist ideology the central agenda of his pontificate.
Pope Francis has numerous friends who are communists and supporters of liberation theology. This friendship is predicated on similar ideology and philosophy. He strongly supports this one world ideology, which is dangerous given the Church's global influence.
In 2015, Pope Francis addressed the UN General Assembly, stating: "The adoption of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development at the world summit, which opens today, is an important sign of hope. I am similarly confident that the Paris conference on climate change will secure fundamental and effective agreements."
In 2016, addressing the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences on human trafficking, he said: "I am grateful for the fact that the representatives of the 193 UN member states unanimously approved the new sustainable development goals."
In March 2017, the Vatican held a conference titled "Religions and the Sustainable Development Goals: Listening to the Cry of the Earth and of the Poor." Pope Francis stated: "The 2030 agenda and the sustainable development goals approved by more than 190 nations in September of 2015 were a great step forward for global dialogue, marking a vitally new and universal solidarity."
These are chilling words given what is known about the sustainable development goals. The Vatican has never been critical of the grave and terrible elements of these goals and the dangers they pose worldwide. Instead, they continue lauding them as a great saving plan, using the plight of the poor to push an oligarch's agenda.
Local Solutions to Global Problems
The world thinks globally, but all solutions are local. The smaller you can make yourself, the more self-reliant and independent you become, the more likely you can survive whatever the world does to itself with relatively little impact on your safety and security. While the world will change enough that many current conveniences may not exist as expected, local resilience provides the best path forward.
When the Roman Empire fell and the world entered the dark ages, people returned to Rome 400 years later and marveled at the ruins, unable to figure out how they were built. In just 400 years, all architectural knowledge was lost. The understanding of legal systems, political systems, and the ideas that built the greatest empire eroded along with the buildings.
To be sustainably local, consider communities that produce far more than their needs. One farmer in rural Idaho could feed 10,000 people, while in cities like San Diego, it takes three people outside the city to keep one San Diego resident alive. Throughout history, big cities have always abused rural communities—this happened in France, England, Russia, China, and around the world. It's happening in the United States where farmers feel abused, and in Europe where farmers are in arms, saying they are the breadbasket that keeps everyone alive, yet they face regulations made in cities that have no business dictating rural practices.
Rural Americans understand the environment intimately. They know more about the ground, water, and food supply chain than city dwellers. When thinking locally, there are practical steps to take. Rural people know how to fix everything—they can repair their roof, grow anything, build anything. They're not intimidated because they live in areas where calling an expert means paying $100 just for them to show up before any work begins. They learn to fix things themselves and are remarkably resourceful. This isn't common in cities, where most residents couldn't survive without the current system.
Practical Preparedness for System Collapse
For those thinking seriously about resilience, a minimum of one year's food supply is advisable. Some maintain seven years of freeze-dried, hermetically sealed supplies, including gourmet options. Water storage is critical—underground tanks, pools that can be converted, and the ability to cook both inside and outside provide flexibility and self-sufficiency.
Serious preppers own pickup trucks, ideally from before 1960, because they have no electronics and are easy to work on. They typically maintain their own gas and diesel tanks and pumps, essentially creating a mini gas station. With decent land, three acres could support a family and many others.
The Death Economy Versus the Life Economy
The current economic system, called a death economy by many economists, is not sustainable and not working. Increasing numbers of people recognize this reality. Throughout the world, consciousness is rising as more people understand the system's failures. Simultaneously, the status quo is pushing back harder, which is true throughout history. Whenever there's been a revolution or consciousness revolution, those with money and power try to stop it. The British Empire tried to stop the United States from breaking away, but failed.
Agents of change must take energy from opposition. In martial arts, when facing someone bigger and stronger, you cannot overpower them directly. You must use their energy against them. Good revolutionaries always use the energy thrown at them against their opponents. George Washington exemplified this principle. He kept losing battles repeatedly but had an amazing ability to persist regardless of circumstances. At Valley Forge and many other places, soldiers' feet were bleeding, they had no shoes, no clothes, little or no food, but they kept going, throwing British energy against the British.
Success must be redefined. Reality is molded by perception. There is no United States, no Ukraine, no corporations, no religion, no culture except as we perceive them. When enough people accept a perception or codify it into law, it changes our actions, and when we change our actions, we change reality. Perception molds reality.
Washington recalled the Battle of the Monongahela during the French and Indian War in what is today Pennsylvania. He was with General Braddock, the best British general in America at the time, marching with the largest British army to Fort Duquesne, which would become Pittsburgh. While marching through wilderness, this huge British army was attacked by a much smaller band of Indians and Frenchmen and totally defeated. Braddock was killed, most officers were killed, hundreds of men were killed, while very few French and Indians were even wounded.
Washington survived and remembered this lesson. He told the Continental Congress that the British weren't invincible. All Americans had to do was hide behind trees and change the perception of warfare. Changing perception leads to changed actions, which changes reality. Washington changed the reality of the British Empire at that point in time, and the British Empire never actually recovered.
We're now at a point in history where we've created a system that doesn't work, based on a perception that we need to maximize short-term profits for corporations and materialistic consumption for everyone else. This perception has molded a reality that no longer serves us. We must change that perception and say instead that we need to maximize long-term benefits for all life on this planet.
Confessions of an Economic Hitman
One former insider worked as an economic hitman, initially believing he was doing the right thing. Omar Torrijos, head of state of Panama, changed that perspective. Torrijos was incredibly charismatic and his people loved him. He was a David standing up to Goliath, standing up to the United States and insisting the Panama Canal belonged to Panamanians and should be reverted back.
A huge swath running through the center of Panama was the canal zone, with approximately 18 private golf courses, magnificent clubs, and movie theaters only for Americans or their employees. It was essentially a US colony inside a sovereign state with its own laws and police force—a real thorn in the side of Panamanians who hated it.
Torrijos had been trained at the School of the Americas, a CIA school that trained operatives in Latin America to support CIA objectives. He knew what was going on, having been trained there himself, but came out absolutely determined to stand up to the United States. He was becoming very popular around the world for this stance. As a problem for the American government, an economic hitman was sent to convert him, bribe him, corrupt him, and bring him around.
Torrijos could see this operative had a conscience and just didn't understand what he was doing was wrong. Torrijos said: "You know what you're doing is terrible. That's really wrong. And I want you to understand that. Why don't you come work for me? You won't make nearly as much money, but you'll have a lot more fun. You'll be doing the right thing. You'll be doing something really good for the world."
This message resonated deeply. Torrijos started showing numbers and statistics about what GDP really represents. After extensive research, this operative reached the conclusion that he couldn't continue this work. However, getting out proved nearly impossible. Nobody wanted him to leave. As the youngest partner in the hundred-year history of a major consulting firm, he was constantly told he had a great deal—doing good work, making lots of money, flying first class around the world, staying in finest hotels, eating in the best restaurants, wining and dining with presidents.
He was living the American dream as the son of a teacher in rural New Hampshire. The pressure not to leave was immense, and part of him didn't want to leave because of the lifestyle. But the more he thought about it, the more he realized he was miserable, living on Valium, alcohol, and caffeine. He would travel to places like Indonesia, flying from Boston, spending a night in Hong Kong hanging out at bars, drinking heavily, taking Valium to knock himself out, then waking up drinking tons of coffee to fly to Indonesia and negotiate huge deals involving massive amounts of money.
He finally realized that maybe this was the American dream, but it wasn't his dream. He wasn't happy. Many people in this business still believe they're doing the right thing, stuck in a system that reinforces this belief repeatedly. Business schools taught that investing lots of money in infrastructure and watching GDP grow was the right approach. The World Bank continues promoting this, as do business schools.
Waking People Up to Reality
How do we encourage people to wake up to what's really going on? Many people are waking up these days. By continuing to hammer away through writing, films, and speaking out, everyone can play a role. Teachers can teach students and communities about these issues.
At a major US college lecture about creating a death economy versus a life economy and working within an imperialistic system, an economics professor raised his hand during questions. He had been tenured for 10 years and just realized that all this time, without even realizing it, he had been teaching people to produce a death economy and create an empire. He was actually encouraging people to become economic hitmen. He asked what he could do about it.
The answer: First, don't lose your job. These students need you. Don't be too radical. It's like getting off oil—we can't do it tomorrow. We must be reasonable and move into it gradually. Tell students what they can do to create a life economy. Show them opportunities in businesses that create better solar energy, wind power, or entirely new forms of energy not yet conceived. Encourage them to look at businesses involved in mining plastic from oceans and recycling it, or restoring destroyed forests or mine pits. Encourage students to pursue businesses they will feel proud of passing on to their children and grandchildren.
Move into this gradually, but don't lose your job. Also understand that some people will never get it, so don't bother trying. If someone insists there are no problems in the world and everything is fine, let them have their insistence. Focus on people who are open to thinking in new ways.
There are people who are economic hitmen today. There are jackals in the CIA who have perhaps been brainwashed, coming out of Navy Seals or similar programs, and they're probably never going to get it. But if we can reach their bosses, or the general population who will elect the next leaders, and consciousness changes, then they will change too.
Many of these operatives are followers. They may be extremely brave at going out and taking action, but they follow what they're told is the right thing. They don't necessarily think deeply about what really is right. They trust their sergeant, their general, or whoever is above them. If we can change the perception of what it means to be successful, then those most committed to doing whatever it takes will do what it takes to turn everything around and create a life economy.
How do you define success? If we can turn around the definition of success from accumulating more and more stuff and maximizing profits, recognizing that businesses must make a profit but don't have to maximize it—they can put some toward the long term and helping their employees more—real change becomes possible. Why do billionaires have to keep making more and more billions? It's a sickness, an addiction. The competitive accumulation of wealth is a pathology that must be recognized and rejected.
The Government's Control of Education
The United States now has a system where parents are considered equal partners with the government. This is enshrined in federal policy, but the policy doesn't mean equal partners at all. Parents are the junior partners. Miguel Cardona, Secretary of Education under Joe Biden, was asked point blank in a Senate hearing if parents are the primary stakeholders in their children's education. He responded that they're important stakeholders, but really educators are—and was cut off there.
The education establishment regards parents as at best an annoyance to be kept at arm's length. This is straight from the pit of hell. Nobody loves a child more than his or her parents. Nobody cares more about that child's well-being than his or her parents.
This raises a fundamental question everyone should ask: Why did we allow government to educate our children in the first place? Looking back at history, it wasn't to give them a good education. It was always to move them in a particular direction.
Government should not be in the business of education. The Bible says the purpose of government is to punish evil. It's not to educate kids, provide healthcare, or redistribute wealth. When government punishes evil, it's acting in its proper lane. When trying to educate children, even with the best intentions, it's like collective farms in the Soviet Union. Even if people running collective farms had good intentions—which they often didn't—it still wouldn't work because proper incentives are eliminated. Government control replaces market mechanisms and price signals. It's a disaster even in the best circumstances.
The solution isn't to alter policy slightly or make policy tweaks to improve the collective farm. The solution is to eliminate the collective farm and return to what worked: private property rights. This must be the long-term solution for education. We never should have allowed government, never should have trusted government, with educating our children in the first place.
Looking at American history, for almost all of American history until starting in the mid-1800s, education was entirely parents' responsibility. To the extent they needed or wanted assistance, they turned to churches, communities, extended family, and neighbors—not government.
This is one of the most critical issues. Even in countries where education hasn't become as horrific as in the United States, people need to know that's the direction it's headed. The US government and UNESCO, the UN education agency, are working together to bring all education systems of the world into this global system. That's the direction everything is moving.
Parents, church leaders, people from all walks of life, and taxpayers need to ask: Is it appropriate for government to educate our children? The answer should be no. It's not appropriate.
The Ultimate Solution: Think Local
Our ability to survive is our ability to be local. Think local. The idea that elites who created this mess somehow win in the end is not true. The failure will be so colossal that everybody will reject it. The only way to survive is to be local. Wherever you are, think local.
All your happiness is local. All the people you associate with and depend on are local. Consider it like planets in a solar system. We have a few planets around us. In personal life, there are people we're really close to, but that's very few. We know lots of people and many consider us friends, but reality limits us because time limits us. We would have a million planets around us if we could have all that time, but we don't.
We must think about finding a place that is local with people who are likeminded. People who are likeminded have a value system. Their politics is common sense, not Democrat or Republican or liberal or conservative. Those labels are meaningless when looking back at your life and who's in your bedroom as you're taking your last breath. It's those last few planets around you. That's all that matters.
The elites can't change that. They'll never be able to change that ever. Their primary goals are supposedly to make the world a better place, but the intelligence community is intertwined with all of this. The goal of this whole enterprise is to transfer money from working Americans to the super rich. The real problems in the world are created primarily by leaders. It's the leaders who must be held accountable and replaced with those who serve the people rather than exploit them.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.