Up Next
Candace Owens Exposes FBI's Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative as Total Lie Based on New Source Information
34:59
Candace Owens Exposes Wikipedia Manipulation Hours After Charlie Kirk Assassination and Confronts Donald Trump Jr.
57:36
Frank Turek Was There When Charlie Kirk Was Murdered: Death Threats, Candace Owens, and the Truth About That Horrible Day
50:36
Frank Exposes the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Israel, Iran War Opposition, and Tyler Robinson's Role
Frank presents evidence connecting Charlie Kirk's assassination to his opposition to a US-Iran war. He examines Tyler Robinson's involvement, the Mormon-intelligence connection, and Mossad's potential role in grooming discord members. The analysis explores ballistics evidence, the 30-06 controversy, and whether Robinson acted alone or as part of a larger intelligence operation targeting the only Trump administration voice against Iranian conflict.
The Motive: Opposition to the Iran War
Frank argues that Charlie Kirk's assassination stems primarily from his opposition to a US war with Iran. Kirk stood as the only voice in Trump's administration against such a conflict, while figures like Rubio, Hegseth, and Vance supported it. Kirk was treated almost as a state representative, receiving honors typically reserved for government officials, including a flag at half-staff following his death.
According to Frank, Israel cannot survive a one-on-one war with Iran without US military involvement. Kirk's opposition to American intervention posed an existential threat to Israel's survival. This motive, Frank suggests, outweighs even the JFK assassination rationale, as JFK's opposition to nuclear weapons was about state protection, whereas this involves the very existence of the Israeli state.
The Secondary Factor: Shifting Away from Pro-Israel Positions
Evidence presented shows Kirk had tweeted about potentially leaving his pro-Israel position. While this could have been a negotiating tactic or response to pressure, it demonstrated he was moving away from unwavering support. Kirk had been conducting polls on his Twitter asking followers whether the US should get involved in Israel's war against Iran, with overwhelming anti-war sentiment from his audience.
Frank notes that Kirk never counter-signaled Trump publicly, always defending Trump's decisions even when he disagreed privately. However, videos existed of Kirk stating he didn't want war with Iran and opposed regime change, positions problematic for the Israeli government.
Tyler Robinson's Involvement
Frank maintains that Tyler Robinson was definitely involved in the assassination, though he's uncertain whether Robinson was the actual shooter or served another role. Robinson belonged to Transifera, a trans Antifa group with pro-Israel leanings, which Frank describes as controlled financially by Israeli networks.
Robinson's background raises questions: he came from a Mormon family, and the Mormon community has extensive history in intelligence agencies including CIA, FBI, and Mossad. Mormons are preferred by intelligence agencies because they don't use drugs or caffeine, making them ideal candidates. The Mormon community, particularly strong in Utah with their connection to Mount Zion, maintains close ties to Israel and believes their role involves supporting Jews in Israel.
Intelligence Operations in Discord Groups
Frank presents a theory about how intelligence agencies, particularly Mossad but also FBI and CIA, operate within Discord groups where extremists gather. These groups often involve far-left positions, furry communities, and other fringe ideologies. Intelligence operatives allegedly infiltrate these spaces to groom and manipulate individuals into carrying out violent acts.
Robinson's ideology combined Mormon background, Transifera membership, and pro-Israel positions—an unusual combination that Frank suggests indicates potential intelligence grooming. The conversation between Robinson and his boyfriend/girlfriend, which was presented as evidence, Frank claims was fake.
The Ballistics Controversy
A major point of contention involves the weapon used. The official narrative claims Robinson used a 30-06 rifle, but Frank and firearms experts he's consulted argue the wound doesn't match that caliber. A 30-06 round should have caused catastrophic damage, potentially removing Kirk's head entirely, yet the wound appeared more consistent with a smaller caliber weapon.
Frank references testing shown in videos where 30-06 rounds create massive temporary and permanent wound cavities in ballistic gel, penetrating through flesh, bone, and exiting with tremendous force. The damage to Kirk didn't match this expected result.
Andrew Kolvet, Kirk's right-hand man at Turning Point USA, claimed he spoke to the surgeon who said Kirk was "made of steel" and it was a "miracle" the bullet didn't penetrate further. This explanation lost credibility with many observers.
The Alternative Theory: Shot from Behind
Frank presents an alternative theory from ballistics experts: Kirk may have been shot from behind with a smaller caliber weapon. The entry wound would be extremely small, but the exit wound would appear large, potentially matching the observed damage. This theory's weakness is that it would require many people to be complicit, including those who performed the autopsy, Kirk's team, and others who would have seen evidence of a different entry wound.
The FBI claims to have video footage of Robinson in prone position on the roof shooting, but hasn't released it publicly. The charging document references this footage, which would supposedly show Robinson from behind, making it difficult to see the weapon clearly. Frank questions why this footage hasn't been made public if it clearly shows Robinson as the shooter.
The Cover-Up Elements
Several elements suggest a potential cover-up. Initially, officials claimed there was no autopsy performed, but later it emerged that an autopsy had been completed. The autopsy report hasn't been released, though Frank notes this delay is normal in such cases.
The FBI received flag at half-staff treatment given to Kirk, the lack of transparent ballistics information, and the inconsistencies in the official narrative all contribute to suspicions about the true nature of the assassination.
The Intelligence Asset Theory
Frank presents a more controversial possibility: Robinson himself may have been a direct intelligence asset rather than a groomed patsy. Given the Mormon community's deep ties to intelligence agencies and Robinson's unusual ideological combination, it's possible Robinson was never actually transgender and the entire persona was constructed for an intelligence operation.
In this scenario, Robinson would have been told to execute the assassination knowing he would take the fall. Frank emphasizes this is a lower probability theory compared to the grooming scenario, but maintains it should be considered given the Mormon-intelligence historical connections.
Why This Matters More Than Other Political Assassinations
Frank argues this assassination carries more weight than even the JFK killing because it involves Israel's existential survival. Without US intervention in a war with Iran, Israel cannot prevail. In a war of attrition, Iran's massive stockpile of missiles and drones would eventually overwhelm Israel's interceptor missile defenses, despite what Western media reports.
More Iranian missiles penetrate Israeli defenses each day, and the mathematics don't support Israel's ability to maintain defense indefinitely without US backing. Kirk represented the singular voice capable of preventing American involvement, making him an unacceptable obstacle to Israeli war planning.
The Conspiracy Theories Frank Rejects
Frank explicitly rejects several alternative theories he considers intelligence operations designed to make legitimate questions seem absurd. He dismisses theories involving drones, pager attacks similar to those used in Lebanon, or security guards giving signals. Frank believes these are deliberately spread to make questioners appear like "kooky flat-earthers," preventing serious examination of the actual evidence.
Robinson's Likely Motivation
If Robinson acted as a manipulated individual rather than a direct asset, Frank believes his motivation likely stemmed from opposition to Kirk's positions on transgender issues and domestic political policies. Kirk had been critical of transgender ideology and the broader LGBTQ activist agenda, which could have motivated someone in Robinson's position to act.
However, Frank emphasizes that even if Robinson believed he was acting on his own ideological motivations, the operation likely involved intelligence agency manipulation through Discord grooming operations. The question isn't whether Robinson pulled the trigger, but who put him in position to do so and why.
Video Transcript
You're saying he was either the psy or
pulled the trigger. One of the two. So
who put him up to it?
>> What happens is intelligence, FBI, CIA,
what they do is they work in these
discord groups. And if you look at a lot
of these school shooters or mass
shooters, they come from these kind of
discord groups where they're speaking
about these kind of far-left or far
extreme positions. And then what I
believe is they go in these discord
groups and kind of brainwash them into
doing these type of things. So someone
like Tyler Robinson, they were into this
kind of furry community. I believe that
likely what's happening is Mossad is
going into these groups and criminal.
>> We're going to talk now about the
Charlie Kirk situation. You think that
Israel had a hand in it though you do
think that Tyler Robinson did play a
role in the hit and you were kind of
talking about
>> Antifa. Well, it's definitely Tyler
Robinson was involved, right?
>> Just go from the beginning again. I'm
sorry for that.
>> So, no, no, no problem. So, like uh in
terms of uh do you want the motive as
well? Like why?
>> Sure. go through everything like you lay
it out why you uh why you think Wizard
was involved, who was the shooter, why
they did it, you know, whatever you
want.
>> So, in terms of um why I think that the
uh why I think that they wanted to kill
him was twofold. The main one I think is
the war with Iran. Charlie Kirk was the
only person who was against the war with
Iran. From all of the Trump cabinet,
whether it was Rubio, Heg Seth or Vance,
they all supported the war with Iran. It
was only Charlie Kirk who was against
that. He was basically like the
administration like you saw the when as
soon as he died they almost gave him a a
burial not a burial in terms of when
they carried the coffin and various
other things which was almost like
someone who was a state representative.
He was very much considered part of the
administration. He was the only person
against
>> the flag that have staff.
>> Exactly. And so he was the only person
who against it and so he stopped America
joining the war and that ended the war
and they know they need to go to war
with Iran again. If Charlie Kirk is the
only person who's going to stop that,
they need to take him out because it
basically will mean that Israel will no
longer exist. If it's a one-on-one war,
one war between Iran and Israel, Iran
wins. They need the US to get involved
to take Iran out. And if they don't and
they allow Iran v Israel, Israel will no
longer exist. So your existence is on
the line. Would you take out one man for
that? Of course you would. And then in
addition to that, he was tweeting that
you saw the evidence was prevent
presented yesterday where he said he
wanted to leave the pro-Israel position.
Now, this could have been him
threatening, but that's good. Like,
look, no rich guy wants to be
blackmailed or threatened, right? That
still is like, look, he's getting too
far. We need to take him out as well.
So, that's the second reason or the
second benefit why you would want to do
it. So, but I still think the strongest
ones Iran because when you take him out,
you lose, you lost all your followers
anyway to Candace and Nick Wuentes and
you, right? So, you guys basically took
all them followers. So, in reality, is
it worth it? It's probably not from a
like keeping your base. That's why the
war with Iran makes so much sense to me
a lot more than like, you know, the
followers or his position or losing the
youth. So you think the war in Iran is
what really got him jammed up because of
his opposition to the war?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Now, do you think that if uh
someone was to play devil's advocate and
say Frank go to your bed and someone
were to say, well, you know, is it worth
murdering an American citizen on US soil
that may or may not turn on us overtly
um and you know challenge our position
on this Iran war? Would they would is
that worth doing an intelligence
operation on stay side and risking you
know diplomacy? Well, the
>> relationship JFK for less. I mean, you
can make the argument JFK was because of
nuclear weapons, right?
>> Exactly. But nuclear weapons is their
protection, but protection for the
state. Yeah.
>> The state doesn't exist. The nuclear
weapons become irrelevant,
>> of course.
>> So, this is about the existence of the
state. So, I would say the motive on
this one is even more than JFK.
>> I'm going to war with Iran and being
able to wage this war with American
support. Is that important?
>> So important. They can't do it without
America.
>> They can't. Yeah, you're right. I agree
with that. They really can't.
>> And he was the only one stopping it. And
I do think that now America will m will
probably join the world. I'm trying to
remember here if he was super overt with
his anti-war sentiment before he passed
away.
>> He wasn't.
>> I know. Yeah, I was going to say I know
like there was like murmurss of him cuz
I remember if you remember did the
United You know what? Let's go on his
Twitter. I'll show you.
>> He did a bunch of polls on this [ __ ] to
see where his audience stood and I
remember this, you know, and RP to
Charlie Kirk. You guys know we I
disagree with him on the whole Israel
thing and everything else like that, but
you know, I think he was more of a
positive, but let me show you guys real
quick here cuz he was doing these polls.
Bam. Here we go. So he was doing polls
like this look June 12th and should the
US get involved in Israel's war against
Iran and then this is him talking about
the conflict or whatever but this he was
doing a couple of these different polls
guys asking about the war where American
sentiment was whatever gave me a
barometer and overwhelmingly people were
anti-war right which is a big contrast
from the neocon era of 20 years ago
where everybody was for the Iraq war
right or a majority of people were for
the Iraq war you could see that he was
having a battle uh I guess and I do
think you know there were some times
where he would say hey I don't want a
war or whatever but he wasn't like super
super anti-war yet.
>> He never counter signal Trump, isn't it?
That was always his point. Like he
always would defend what Trump did, even
if he disagreed with it privately.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh but generally speaking, you saw like
there was a there was a video where he
said he didn't want a war with Iran and
he said he didn't want regime change. So
like all of these things were
problematic for the Israeli regime.
Yeah.
>> From a motive perspective.
>> So you think the motive is not
necessarily turning on Israel as much as
him being a barrier in the way to get US
approval to join in the conflict in the
conflict with Iran. Yeah.
>> Okay. Um, now, how do you think it went
down then? So, explain to us what do you
think Tyler Robinson's role was? Yeah.
>> Um, and how that plays into like the
Israelis.
>> So, obviously I disagree.
>> So, you have a motive.
>> Yeah. I disagree with all these cookie
theories like for example um that there
was drones or that there was the pager
attack or the fact that you know um
there's other like you know the the
security guards were doing signals. I
think that's an intelligence operation
and the reason they do that is that you
don't question the legitimate stories.
you almost sound like these kooky
flatearthers and this is intelligent do
that all the time so that you're not
basically willing to question the real
narrative
>> but in terms of Tyler Robinson so
there's two possibilities and I'm 50/50
but I do think Tyler Robinson was
involved but was he the shooter so 100%
Tyler Robinson was involved but 50%
whether he was a shooter or not in terms
of he being involved that's happened
because is transifer which is the trans
>> that's where we left off before if you
could explain that to him
>> is basically the modern iteration of
that is controlled by Israel
>> and basically how they control it is
financially. They support it through
their networks and what they also do is
um they'll send agitators into certain
protests whether it's pro Palestinian or
pro-left or whatever it may be to cause
issues within that protest as well. So
this is what something that Israel does,
you know, Tyler Robinson's
boyfriend/girlfriend.
>> Yep. The guy that was transitioning
>> from one of the researchers I spoke to
says that he was pro Israel Lance Briggs
or Lance Digs or whatever the person.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> And then what was uh Tyler? Was he was
he pro- Israel or was he pro I'm
assuming most people on the left are pro
Palestine.
>> So so this so they are because they this
group is a weird trans Antifa group
which is like more more pro Israel. If I
had to guess I'd say he was pro Israel.
>> Okay. So how does he play in in your
opinion?
>> Because remember his family is a Mormon
family.
>> Yes.
>> And Mormons are basically conservatives
basically like Jews bro. I know I'm not
allowed to say I know my guy gets
cancelled but like Mormons are like
worship Jewish Jews and I know the
Christians but
>> really yeah.
>> Okay. And the Mormon community and
that's why I always have question marks
about a lot of Mormons. I'll be honest
with you. But the Mormon community have
a long history in intelligence. CIA,
FBI, and massage.
>> Well, they don't do drugs. They're very
clear.
>> They don't they don't. Yeah.
>> They don't do drugs. They don't drink
caffeine. FBI has a lot of FBI. But a
lot of people don't know. FBI has a lot
of Mormon agents. Lots.
>> That's a long long history of FBI, CIA,
and um
>> That is true. And
>> lots of Mormon agents cuz they don't do
drugs. They don't do nothing.
>> Yeah. So
>> Yeah. And Mossad. And so that's So I'm
just demonstrating all the links, right?
>> Yeah. And so um in terms of there's a
lot of motive that he would be the
shooter because Israel will get into the
discord and you know cause you know
these transifer far-left discords and
try and manipulate people into doing
certain things. So I think there is
something going on there. Obviously we
know the conversation was fake between
the the two lovers. Right. Um and so the
only thing that stands against the point
that whether he was the shooter for me
is because he's there on the roof.
>> It's weird that the FBI didn't release
the footage of him in the prone position
shooting.
>> The charging document says they've got
it. Okay, they do have Why did they show
it to us?
>> I I don't know why they did that.
>> That's something I didn't like. Like I
was like, "Dude, just show like you
already have him running across the roof
like show everything from him in the
prone position shooting cuz they said
that he was on in the pro position for
like only like a minute or two."
>> Yeah. So they claim in the charging
document they've got a video of him in
the prone position, but remember the
prone the video is from the back. So you
won't be able to see the gun, but this
is the claim. I'm just telling you what
the charging document says.
>> Um so so that shows that there is a
possibility he was just shooter. He was
running with it. He had the gun and he
was wrapped in a towel that you you can
see once you slow it down. So there is a
high likelihood he's the shooter. The
thing that goes against it is the 3006,
right?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's what they're
claiming
>> because um by speaking to a lot of
people who are experts on this and who
have had on spaces, they say that that
wound does not look like it's from a
3006.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Cuz it would have blew his
head off is what they're saying.
>> Claim. Yeah. And more likely this looks
like an exit wound. And they claim that
um because basically 3006 couldn't do
this. And you know the there should be
an exit wound and there's no exit wound.
Now the claim is that the angle that he
was shooting from wouldn't cause it. But
if you look at the angle, we did the
maths on it. It's like it's not that
much degrees. Is it like 4° angle?
>> Mhm.
>> That wouldn't be that much of a That's
quite an acute angle. I don't think that
would cause the bullet to go down. Uh
and yeah, this video is decent as well.
He
>> Which one do you want to see? Which one
do you think is I've seen the one above?
>> This one?
>> Yeah. And he shows it goes through
>> What's going on everybody? Welcome back.
Thank you. Here, give your I'll play it
after. He he shows it goes through um
the gel and then goes into the water and
stopped by the water. And then the
second one it goes through flesh, sorry,
like flesh, meat, bone, thick bone, and
then another piece of like flesh and
then it goes straight through all of
them.
>> Okay, bit. All right, let me uh
>> the controversy surrounding the
ballistics of the 3006. So, there are
thousands of people out there right now,
including very popular creators with
large followings, who are convinced that
the damage sustained from the shot was
not consistent with the 306. They think
it should have been way more severe. I'm
not here to say yes or no. I just
thought we would test the caliber for
ourselves and find out in real time.
>> And didn't the surgeons say something
like his bones stopped the bullet from
going further, which is like crazy.
>> Well, this is the No. Well, the thing
is, first of all, they claimed there was
no autopsy and now we find out there's
an autopsy.
>> Yeah. They haven't released the autopsy
report either, right?
>> No, but that's normal. Like it takes
photos to
>> release the autopsy. Yeah.
>> Even though it's complete.
>> Yeah. Okay.
>> What h what you're referring to is
Andrew Kovlak, the um
>> his right-hand guy.
>> Yeah. Of TP USA. He said that he spoke
to the surgeon and the surgeon said that
basically Charlie Kirk is made of steel
and it was a miracle and that's the
reason the bullet didn't penetrate.
>> Yeah, that that made people say what the
[ __ ] like they lost a lot of Yeah. get
started. Okay. So, like I said, one of
the big theories I'm seeing online is
people are not buying the damage
sustained to be consistent with that of
a 300 6. And there's a couple things you
have to understand when a bullet travels
through a target, especially a high
velocity rifle round like 300 6. There's
basically two things happening
simultaneously. First, you have the
permanent wound cavity, which is the
damage caused by the actual bullet
itself. Then, you have the temporary
wound cavity, which is caused by the
velocity, impact, and the energy
transfer of the round. It's like a shock
wave of energy traveling through the
target that only lasts a second. It's
really only visible in ballistic shell
on high-speed cameras, but it basically
just looks like a big bubble expanding
inside the target. And this is why
targets like watermelons, for instance,
basically turn into vapor when we shoot
them with rifles. But animals and humans
with a lot more weight, mass, tissue,
etc. are going to do a much better job
at containing that energy. So internally
there could be a massive area affected
by the bullet while externally you only
see a tiny little hole. Hopefully this
kind of clarifies it for the people that
thought the damage should have been far
more catastrophic. That's typically not
how it works when people get shot. So
today we're going to shoot a few
different targets with the 300 6 and
find out for ourselves how much damage
this rifle round actually does. All
right guys, the first target we're going
to shoot with the 300 6 is a 10% clear
ballistic shell block. I'm hoping that
this will show us both the permanent and
temporary wound cavity so we can see the
difference. I've also got some water
jugs behind it kind of scattered off to
the side just in case the bullet passes
all the way through or takes a sharp
turn in the gel. This should also
probably show us how unpredictable high
velocity rifle rounds can be. Now, I was
going to start with a watermelon just to
show you how crazy those are, but we
literally just shot one in our last
Charlie Kirk video with a 308 at 142
yards, which is the exact distance he
was shot from. So, I'll probably just
play that video now and you can see how
dramatic it was. Oh [ __ ]
smokes the watermelon.
>> So, again, I think videos like that have
kind of given people the wrong
impression. [ __ ] exploded, dude.
>> And if they're inexperienced, they think
that's what bullets do in real life. And
obviously, that's not the case. I'm
hoping this will help prove that point
as well. All right, guys. The rifle
we're using is the 1903 Springfield 3006
from BFF Firearms. We've got our 150
grain full metal jacket. Probably the
most common 306 ammo there is. The
problem is we don't know what kind of
ammo this guy used. They typically don't
go with super hightech rounds. So, this
is a pretty good guess, but we just
don't know for sure. Let's see what this
one does. Going to try to put it right
in the middle of our gel block.
Wow.
Okay. Well, that was actually more
dramatic than I thought it would be. Our
ballistic shell got yeated off the
table. And it looks like we have a hole
in our 5gallon water jug. So, hopefully
we captured that bullet.
Okay, I tried to clean off the ballistic
shell block since it fell under the
ground after it was shot. You can
definitely see the temporary wound
cavity on the high-speed footage. So,
I'll play that for you guys. And that is
the permanent wound cavity inside the
ballistic shell block. So, that's the
actual damage that the bullet did inside
the ballistic shell. And even for a
rifle round, that is a massive wound
cavity in a ballistic shell block. I've
got to say, this thing outperformed what
I thought it would do. You can see for
the first, I don't know, six or seven
inches, it's just a very small hole
where the bullet is penetrating. And
then about halfway through, it started
dumping most of its energy in that
ballistic shell block. We have one
bullet fragment that I see right there,
probably 2 in from the end of the
ballistic shell. And it did curve down.
The block is flipped, you know, compared
to what it was when we shot it. And so
the bullet curved down, exited out
towards the bottom, and it did enter our
5gallon water jug. And there it is right
there.
>> Now that we kind of see what the damage
is with the with this with with this
gun. So what what are your thoughts, I
guess, as far as like So you think that
he was the shooter?
>> Yeah.
>> But yeah, the the thing is is that do
you not buy the 30 odd six? Do you think
you shot him with another gun? Do you
think that weapon
>> Oh, no. So I know he was definitely
involved, but whether he was the shooter
or not, I'm 50/50 about. This is what
makes me think that it wasn't him
because because for it to not be
>> 30 out six and the damage obviously is
not indicative of him.
>> Exactly. But in terms of it not being
him so thing is if it's not him it means
that the uh guy who's doing the autopsy
is lying. It means Charlie Kirk's lying.
It means everyone's in on it right
because you will see the wound somewhere
else. So what I mean by that the other
possible theory which I think is also
likely is that he was shot from behind.
Buy a smaller caliber weapon. And by the
way these are not my theories. I'm not
an expert. I'm going from the UK. This
is just experts who come on MySpace and
very very made a very strong and cogent
argument and provided the evidence to
me.
>> Um and so what they say is that he was
shot close to the ear. The entry would
be would be extremely tiny but the exit
wound wound would be that large. Yeah.
>> And so that is quite plausible as well.
And so that's why I'm 50/50 cuz I think
the weakness of this one is everyone has
to be in on it. And the weakness of this
is the 30 yard six clearly just doesn't
normally cause that kind of damage that
we saw. So I think those are the kind of
points but I think it's one of those two
but definitely tell you Robert Robinson
either was the psy up there or he shot.
So he was definitely involved.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> So just so we can bring this all
together because obviously we're
analyzing evidence and everything.
>> So just so I make sure I have this
right. So your theory is you think
Israel was involved with killing him
with assassinating him because he posed
a threat not so much to influence in the
United States and well his influence in
the United States and him pulling those
people from supporting Israel rather his
opposition to the Iran war. Yeah. is
what you think got him jammed up. and uh
the fact that he was starting to deviate
away from the Israel lobby
>> might have been too much of a problem
for them when it comes to them needing
support with to fight the Iranians,
which is true cuz we know that if the
United States had not intervened um and
ended that conflict with bombing Fordo
and everything else like that. I do
think that the Iranians would have
destroyed Tel Aviv. Um because obviously
more and more missiles are starting to
get in day by day, contrary to what the
Western media says in a war of attrition
because obviously interceptor missiles
just just if you do the math, the
interceptor missiles, they don't have
enough interceptor missiles to deal with
Iran's huge [ __ ] stockpile of
missiles and drones. They just don't. So
you're saying Israel needs US backing to
fight a war against Iran. Charlie stood
in the way of that. We obviously have
the Twitter post here with him, you
know, gauging the interest of his
audience in the war. Obviously, they're
saying no. He leaned more against the
war. And they felt as though if he was
going to turn his back on the Israel
lobby, that would also mean turning his
back on the war, which would hurt their
ability.
>> And even if he didn't turn his back on
the Israel lobby, if Israel went to war
with Iran, he might counter signal them
or he's likely to counter signal them
and stop American America's getting
involved in the war with Iran. If
America doesn't get involved in the war
in Iran, Israel no longer exists.
>> So, do you think that he had a death
sentence as soon as he went to the White
House and uh told Trump that we don't we
don't want this war? Yeah. You think
that [ __ ] him up?
>> Yeah.
>> No, I mean that's an interesting theory.
I mean I can I can see you you have
motive. You have possibility of how it
was done. I mean we you're still like
you're saying he was either the psy or
pulled the trigger, one of the two. Um
so you do think that so what was what
would Tyler Robinson's I guess what
would his motive be to do that? And then
did he know that he was working for the
Israeli government presumably in this?
>> I don't think so. So who put him up to
it in your
>> um I think that what happens is uh you
know intelligence and this is this is
going to be like um any intelligence
Mossad FBI CIA I think in this case it
was Masad what they do is they work in
these discord groups and if you look at
a lot of these school shooters sorry
school shooters or mass shooters or
these extremists they come from these
kind of discord groups where they're
speaking about these kind of far-left or
far extreme positions or they believe in
this kind of they're gaining the law and
then what I believe is that what happens
is they go in these discord groups and
kind kind of um brainwashed them into
doing these type of things. So someone
like Tyler Robinson, they were into this
kind of furry community. They were the
entire belief system is really weird
because he was Mormon. He was like part
of Transifera and then they were pro
Israel as well. When he brought all of
that together, it's kind of some weird
>> this group that he's a part of is pro
Israel.
>> Yeah. It's kind of some weird ideology.
And so what that tells me is that um I
believe that likely what's happening is
Mossad is going into these groups and
grooming people. So, we know like I
guess the who the puppeteer is, the ma
the puppet master, but what was in
Robinson's head, assuming he was the
shooter? Did he go in there and say,
"I'm going to shoot Kirk because I don't
like his politics when it comes to his
criticisms of the tea community." Like,
what was his motive for potentially
getting involved in this?
>> I think it's likely. Yeah. That
>> Okay. So, you think domestic political
policy or belief systems with with
Charlie Kirk is why%
on that.
>> Okay. Okay.
>> And and so I'm saying that's likely and
that's the normal narrative.
>> I think there's a big possibility that
all of that's fake. Okay.
>> And he's a Mormon and he's part of
intelligence.
>> Okay. So you don't really know. So okay.
So the the motive can or well his
knowledge of the operation can vary
>> because if you know the history of the
Mormons right I know this sounds like I
know people are going to get upset what
I'm saying but someone who's looked into
it.
>> That's fine. Give a theory man. I'm
listening.
>> Yeah.
Decent amount of history you see that
even from the 18 I believe 1865 or is it
what year it was I was looking into the
Mormons have been involved in
intelligence. If you look at it like for
example the Mormon community is very big
in Utah. They got Mount Zion there.
>> They're very much considered like Jews.
They believe that their role is to all
Jews in Israel.
>> And so when you put all of those things
together, you look put Mossad, I think
there is a decent possibility that he
was never even trans and this was just
an intelligence operation and he was
just he was actually an asset himself.
>> Okay. For US or Israeli intelligence?
>> Israel.
>> And they just told him, "Hey, go in
there and shoot this guy and then we're
going and you're going to take the
fall."
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. I mean,
>> I'm saying that's a minor possibility. I
think the more likely is.
>> So again, it's like percentages, isn't
it? And I'm not trying to not do it's
just that there's no like I'm not stupid
enough to just say this is it when we
haven't got enough information or
evidence. Likely he's just was angry
with Charlie cuz the transgender, but
I'm saying this is a possibility and
just keep that in your mind. Uh because
um cuz that option's there.
>> Okay.
It's likely