[00:00] nurse
[00:14] and associates. May I help you?
[00:16] >> Hi, it's Jason Goodman. Um, did you
[00:19] intend for me to call Blake sort of
[00:21] right now because I've tried him three
[00:22] times and he's not answering.
[00:25] >> Um, sorry sir, I I didn't pick up
[00:28] earlier. What's this in regard to
[00:30] >> uh the other woman answering the phone
[00:32] called me back and gave me Blake's cell
[00:34] phone number and said to call him and
[00:36] I've tried him and he's not answering.
[00:39] >> Okay. I'm sorry. Hold on just a second.
[00:41] Okay.
[00:41] >> Yeah. Yeah.
[00:48] >> Mr. Goodman.
[00:49] >> Yeah.
[00:50] >> I'm sorry. Have you tried to email
[00:53] Blake?
[00:54] >> Well, I was just told to call him. I was
[00:56] just told to call him on his cell phone.
[00:58] Is that no longer
[00:59] >> Oh, okay. Okay. Um I I would suggest
[01:03] emailing him.
[01:04] >> Why?
[01:05] >> He'll reply.
[01:06] >> Well, I was told to call him. Why is
[01:08] that no longer
[01:10] >> what he wants?
[01:10] >> Sorry, I'm not the one that I didn't
[01:12] answer the phone earlier, so I really
[01:14] don't know. But I would attempt to email
[01:15] him, see if he got if you can get a hold
[01:17] of him.
[01:17] >> I'd prefer to call him. Is there a
[01:19] reason why he won't answer the phone?
[01:22] >> I I have no idea. Let me let me find out
[01:25] see if I can find out some information
[01:27] for you. Hang on.
[01:37] >> Okay, hang on one second, sir.
[01:38] >> Thanks.
[01:52] >> This is Blake. Blake, it's Jason
[01:53] Goodman. How are you
[01:56] >> doing? Well,
[01:57] >> so I was just watching Chris Martinson's
[02:00] video and if I understood him correctly,
[02:03] you have obtained the original video
[02:05] from Samir MSI.
[02:12] Is that right?
[02:14] Blake, you there?
[02:18] Blake, did I lose you?
[02:20] >> Hello.
[02:20] >> Can you hear me?
[02:23] You are cutting out really bad.
[02:25] >> I'm sitting here on my phone uh in my
[02:29] apartment. I said I was just watching
[02:31] Chris Martinson's video and if I
[02:33] understood him correctly, it seems that
[02:35] you've obtained the original video of
[02:38] Charlie Kirk being shot from Samir
[02:41] Mossi. Is that correct or incorrect?
[02:44] >> Uh from someone in the crowd. I've put
[02:46] out requests for people to send their
[02:51] videos in.
[02:53] >> Right. And the one that you've got there
[02:55] seems to have come from Samir Mossi,
[02:57] right?
[02:59] >> Samir Mossi. No.
[03:01] >> Oh, it didn't come from Samir Mossi
[03:03] because he's the guy who claims to have
[03:04] shot that video. So, do you have the
[03:07] original video or No.
[03:10] >> Did he give it to you?
[03:12] He didn't give it to me, but ABC News
[03:14] said he shot it and he confirmed that to
[03:16] me on the phone.
[03:20] >> Okay.
[03:21] >> So, are you sitting in front of your
[03:22] computer?
[03:23] >> Are you wanting it? I mean, like, just
[03:25] ask me if you want the video. I mean,
[03:26] Jason, here's the deal, man. Look, I I
[03:30] do not like you because I feel like
[03:34] number one, I feel completely attacked
[03:37] by you and I am just someone that is uh
[03:41] just trying to get to the truth, okay?
[03:44] And am just a normal everyday person. I
[03:48] don't want to be in this sort of like
[03:52] investigative jour. I'm way too busy. I
[03:54] have no desire to. But I'm also a really
[03:57] pissed-off American. Okay. And the way I
[04:01] feel that things took off is that it's
[04:04] more of a blood sport for you. How did
[04:06] they your partner to talk a partner? I
[04:09] have no amount of [ __ ] on people.
[04:11] >> Hang on now. I don't have a partner
[04:13] blood.
[04:13] >> This is just me, Jason. Let me talk and
[04:15] then I'll let you talk. So
[04:17] >> look, that's how everything started
[04:19] started off. Okay. Now, whether you had
[04:22] the same video, there's there's two
[04:25] >> or three different people that are on
[04:28] that side
[04:30] >> with that resolution. So, I hope that
[04:32] you did not get the video because if
[04:35] that is true, then you deliberately
[04:38] deliberately deceived, which I I
[04:41] genuinely don't think you did. Okay? But
[04:43] if you if you do have that video, then
[04:46] you would clearly be able to tell that
[04:49] the object is moving in the opposite
[04:52] direction of what a bullet would travel.
[04:55] So um so if you would like the video, I
[04:59] will be more than happy to share it with
[05:01] you. I I have told this on every post
[05:05] that I will share every ounce of video.
[05:08] It's cost me money up until this point
[05:12] and I am not looking for money. I am
[05:14] just looking for truth for everyone. So,
[05:20] I'll be more than happy to share it um
[05:23] if you would like, but other than that,
[05:25] I'm not going to like disclose anything
[05:27] else because number one, I J I just
[05:29] don't know you, man. And like I don't
[05:31] like you. I don't trust you. So,
[05:34] >> may I speak?
[05:36] >> Sure. I don't have a partner. I presume
[05:39] you're referring to John Cullen, but
[05:40] he's a guy who has appeared on my show.
[05:42] He's not my partner in any way and he
[05:44] doesn't speak for me and he doesn't
[05:46] represent me.
[05:47] >> So, what specifically were like on his
[05:49] podcast?
[05:50] >> What specifically have I done
[05:52] >> that you perceive is coming at you that
[05:54] causes you to tell me twice in the first
[05:56] phone call we've ever had that you don't
[05:57] like me? What have I done?
[06:00] Um, well, I guess it's the fact that
[06:03] like being called a [ __ ] And
[06:06] >> I never called you a [ __ ] That's
[06:08] something someone else said to you. I
[06:10] never called you a [ __ ] Where did I
[06:12] call you a [ __ ] That sounds like
[06:13] something John Cullen would do. And
[06:15] yeah, he was on my podcast, but he
[06:17] doesn't speak for me. He's not my
[06:19] partner, and I didn't call you.
[06:21] >> That's where because I just don't know
[06:23] like anything really about
[06:25] >> someone else does something, then you
[06:27] don't like me. Is that what I
[06:28] understand?
[06:30] One more time.
[06:31] >> If someone else does something, then you
[06:33] don't like me. Is that what I
[06:34] understand?
[06:35] >> No. I So, I was under the impression
[06:38] that you two are like on this thing
[06:41] together, this mission. I did not
[06:42] realize that you're like an independent
[06:45] actor
[06:46] um by yourself and you just had him on
[06:49] there. So, so forgive me for
[06:53] uh saying that you are the one that
[06:56] called me a [ __ ] I just I kind of h had
[06:58] you guys in the same boat. Okay. So, um
[07:02] please accept my apology on that one.
[07:04] But at the same token, there also seems
[07:06] to be kind of this idea or notion behind
[07:10] like your aura that if it's not your
[07:13] idea or something that came out of your
[07:15] brain or came uh you know out of your
[07:19] labors like then it's it's it's a a scop
[07:23] or it's fake. I don't think I've ever
[07:25] said that. I don't think I ever said
[07:27] that. See, the the first time I remember
[07:29] seeing you
[07:30] >> was um maybe days after I located what I
[07:35] determined to be drones in the Adam
[07:36] Bartholomew video and I saw some tweets
[07:38] from you and I realized I had blocked
[07:40] you and I presumed maybe we interacted
[07:42] on the Butler thing. So, I unblocked you
[07:44] to discuss what you said was a drone
[07:47] coming out of a vent and you gave me a
[07:49] very rude response. And we've now
[07:51] confirmed with Adam Bartholomew going
[07:53] back there that there's a very fine mesh
[07:56] over only some of those things are
[07:58] actually even could be construed as
[08:01] vents. Some of them are completely
[08:02] closed and the ones that allow air to
[08:04] pass through have a fine
[08:06] >> think it is then
[08:07] >> I think it was a bug very close to the
[08:09] lens and I explained that in a number of
[08:11] detailed videos but that's irrelevant
[08:13] because you and I had an encounter on a
[08:15] podcast where I was kicked off for being
[08:17] a Jew
[08:18] >> and I asked you a very direct question
[08:20] which is how did you use chat GPT? You
[08:24] said you used frames. That means you
[08:26] loaded
[08:28] 124,000 frames into chat GPT. And you
[08:32] told me we would do a Zoom call where
[08:33] you would verify for me how you did
[08:35] that. Are you ready to do that? Because
[08:36] I'd like to see it.
[08:41] >> Uh yeah, I'll do it at some point. Like
[08:43] I'm very like I'm very busy. I'll show
[08:45] you exactly what I did.
[08:46] >> We'll do that. We'll do that in the
[08:47] future. When can we do that?
[08:48] >> Quite frankly, like here's the deal,
[08:50] Jason. I genuinely I'm I have moved on
[08:54] from the drone thing. If
[08:56] >> I have true I'm just saying that you
[08:59] made a commitment to do something and
[09:00] you said you're interested in the truth.
[09:02] >> No, I didn't make a commitment on
[09:04] anything. Um
[09:05] >> you said to me on a phone call on a Zoom
[09:06] call before I got kicked off for being a
[09:08] Jew. You said to me, you'll do a Zoom
[09:11] call with me and show me how you did
[09:14] this because I don't think that's true.
[09:16] Now, just now you've told me you're
[09:18] interested in finding the truth. Maybe
[09:20] I'm wrong.
[09:20] >> Oh, absolutely. So, we'll go somehow.
[09:23] You loaded 124,000 frames into chat GPT.
[09:27] Had it give you a to the second precise
[09:30] list of timestamps where high contrast
[09:33] dots showed up that you didn't bother to
[09:36] verify any further than that there were
[09:37] dots there because when I went through
[09:40] and spent two days tracking,
[09:42] >> you're wasting my [ __ ] time, man.
[09:44] >> I let you talk. Hey, Blake, I let you
[09:46] talk and now I'm talking. You said you'd
[09:48] let me talk.
[09:49] Okay,
[09:50] >> I magnified each of those things, some
[09:52] as much as 2,400%.
[09:55] I evaluated whether they were small
[09:58] objects close to the lens or distant
[10:01] objects far from the lens, how their
[10:04] bodies changed over time, if they were
[10:06] obscured by atmospheric haze. I did a
[10:09] pretty detailed evaluation and I found
[10:12] that everything that you identified was
[10:14] an eagle or some sort of bird or an
[10:16] insect. So, okay,
[10:18] >> you said you'd tell me how you located
[10:20] drones with AI. I'd like to follow up on
[10:22] that. Now, what's happening now is your
[10:24] friend or associate or whatever he is
[10:26] who says he's in communication with you,
[10:28] Chris Martinson, says that you've
[10:31] obtained the original video, which
[10:33] separately Samir Mossi says he recorded.
[10:36] So, I presume you've interacted with
[10:38] Samir Mossi. Is that correct or no?
[10:42] >> Jason, I'm not going to tell you who
[10:45] I've interacted with. I don't [ __ ]
[10:47] trust you. Okay. Why don't you tell me
[10:49] what is hard? I'm not going to tell you
[10:53] who I've interacted with. I've
[10:54] interacted with 15 different students.
[10:57] >> Okay. So, he's the one who got that
[10:58] video. You don't want to tell me because
[11:00] you don't trust me because somebody else
[11:01] called you a [ __ ] Is that right?
[11:04] >> No. I just don't trust you because I
[11:06] just don't trust you.
[11:07] >> Why?
[11:07] >> Because I think you're running a massive
[11:09] interference campaign.
[11:10] >> How am I doing? What have I done that is
[11:12] massive interference according to you?
[11:15] Um,
[11:17] I'll I'll I'll compile some stuff.
[11:19] >> Well, just tell me now off the top of
[11:21] your head. I mean, you're pretty
[11:21] convinced of this. What have I done that
[11:23] consists of massive interference? You I
[11:25] just told you I examined Adam uh
[11:28] Bartholomew's video. I contacted Adam
[11:30] Bartholomew on the 11th or the 12th and
[11:33] got that original video. He told me that
[11:36] on the basis of me doing that, you
[11:38] contacted him and asked specifically for
[11:40] the video that I had got.
[11:42] >> What? Hang on just a second. What? Now
[11:44] you are saying that because you got it,
[11:47] I asked him for it.
[11:48] >> No, I'm saying that's what Adam
[11:49] Bartholomew told.
[11:50] >> That's what you just said. You just said
[11:51] that you got the video.
[11:53] >> Stop talking and listen carefully and
[11:55] I'll explain it to you. What Adam
[11:57] Bartholomew said to me, maybe he's
[11:59] mistaken. He said to me that after I got
[12:03] the video from Adam Bartholomew, and I
[12:06] made it publicly known that I did that,
[12:07] I went into great detail about the file
[12:11] size and the way Adam recorded it and
[12:13] how I got it. Adam told me that after
[12:15] that happened, you contacted him and
[12:18] that you asked for the video and that
[12:20] Adam was a little uncomfortable that you
[12:22] were saying all kinds of things about
[12:24] finding drones and that you told him
[12:25] that you found an angel in the video. Is
[12:27] that true, Blake?
[12:30] There's a weird reflection.
[12:32] >> But did you tell Adam Bartholomew that
[12:33] you found an
[12:34] >> Yeah, I said there there looked like a
[12:36] like a weird uh reflection.
[12:38] >> So, it seems like Adam Bartholomew is an
[12:40] honest and truthful guy and he told me
[12:42] that you contacted him specifically
[12:45] citing the fact that I had obtained the
[12:47] video from him and you wanted that same
[12:50] that's not true.
[12:50] >> So, he lied. You're saying Adam
[12:52] Bartholomew lied when he told me that?
[12:55] If he said that I contacted him because
[12:58] he was mistaken. Maybe he was mistaken.
[13:00] Look, Jason, we're done with this. I
[13:03] don't give a [ __ ] about anything that
[13:06] you have.
[13:08] So, listen. I am done with this
[13:10] conversation. Leave me alone. Do not
[13:13] contact me again. Do you understand?
[13:16] Thank you. Goodbye. told me to call you.
