Jim Jordan Exposes Fauci's Evasive Testimony on BLM Protests During COVID Lockdowns
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Jack Posobiec Exposes Facebook Whistleblower Operation Funded by Liberal Billionaire Pierre Omidyar
2:25:11
Tucker Carlson on Venezuela Operation: America Explicitly Becomes an Empire and What That Means for Free Speech
1:42:39
Anthony Fauci's Southeast DC Vaccine Campaign Backfires: Black Resident Challenges COVID Fear Tactics
12:06
Jim Jordan Exposes Fauci's Evasive Testimony on BLM Protests During COVID Lockdowns
During a July 2020 congressional hearing, Jim Jordan confronted Dr. Anthony Fauci about the glaring inconsistency in COVID-19 restrictions: churches, beaches, and businesses were shut down with force, yet mass BLM protests were never discouraged. Fauci repeatedly claimed he wasn't in a position to limit gatherings, despite spending months dictating lockdown policies for every aspect of American life. This exchange revealed the political calculations behind pandemic restrictions and exposed how public health guidance became weaponized against certain activities while protecting others. The conversation also touches on early evidence that COVID-19 was man-made, with one NIH doctor privately warning in July 2020 that the virus appeared manipulated.
Jim Jordan Questions Fauci on Protest Restrictions
In July 2020, during a congressional hearing, Representative Jim Jordan pressed Dr. Anthony Fauci on a fundamental contradiction in America's COVID-19 response. While churches, schools, beaches, and small businesses faced strict lockdowns enforced by government power, mass protests involving hundreds of thousands of people received no similar restrictions or condemnation from health officials.
Jordan's questioning was direct: "Do protests increase the spread of the virus?" Fauci initially gave a vague answer about crowding and masks. When Jordan pressed him on whether protests should be limited, given that half a million protesters gathered on June 6th alone, Fauci became evasive, claiming he wasn't "in a position to determine what the government can do in a forceful way."
The Hypocrisy of Selective Enforcement
Jordan highlighted the absurdity of Fauci's claim that he had no authority to recommend limiting gatherings. The government had already:
Shut down churches across the country
Closed schools and beaches
Used bulldozers to fill skate parks with sand
Cut down beach volleyball nets
Welded pipes over basketball hoops in parks
Covered swing sets with nets
Arrested a man for paddleboarding alone in the bay
Fauci had spent months making proclamations about Thanksgiving gatherings, restaurant capacity, and even dating. Yet when asked about mass protests potentially spreading COVID-19, he suddenly claimed he wasn't in a position to make recommendations.
The Supreme Court and Religious Liberty
Jordan referenced the Calvary Chapel case, where five justices on the Supreme Court ruled that Nevada could limit church services while allowing casinos to operate. Justice Gorsuch dissented, writing: "There's no world in which the Constitution permits Nevada to favor Caesar's Palace over Calvary Chapel."
Jordan asked Fauci whether the Constitution could favor one First Amendment liberty (protesting) over another (practicing faith). Fauci responded that he wasn't "favoring anybody over anybody" and made only "a broad statement that avoid crowds of any type." Yet he had just refused to recommend limiting protests when directly asked.
Personal Stories of COVID Tyranny
The discussion included a personal account of fighting back against funeral restrictions in California in January 2021. Despite government orders prohibiting funerals, one family insisted on holding a dignified outdoor service for their mother. They told the funeral home and cemetery they would provide their own chairs, flowers, and musicians if necessary. The funeral proceeded despite official objections.
This story illustrates how COVID restrictions denied basic human dignity to families during their most vulnerable moments, while mass political protests continued without interference.
Early Evidence of Lab Origin
The conversation also revealed that some scientists working for the government knew early on that COVID-19 appeared to be man-made. Dr. David Clonoff, a professor of medicine and leading authority on diabetes who was working with the NIH, told a friend on July 3, 2020: "Receptor 26 looks a little sticky, but don't quote me."
This was his way of saying the virus seemed manipulated—man-made. He explicitly asked not to be quoted because revealing this truth at the time would have ruined his career. The scientific establishment was actively silencing anyone who suggested COVID-19 originated from a lab.
The Pattern of Evasion
Throughout the hearing, Fauci repeatedly claimed ignorance on topics he had previously been authoritative about. When asked about natural immunity, he claimed not to know. When asked about protests, he suddenly had no position despite months of dictating pandemic policy.
This pattern of selective ignorance is a tell—a sign of deception. When someone who "knew everything" about COVID suddenly "doesn't know" basic facts, they're lying. Fauci had made recommendations on dating, baseball, and countless other activities, but when asked about half a million people gathering during a pandemic, he claimed he couldn't possibly weigh in.
Political Calculations Behind Public Health
The exchange demonstrates that pandemic restrictions were never truly about public health. They were political tools. Fauci wouldn't criticize BLM protests because it would have created political problems for him. He had no similar concerns about shutting down churches, small businesses, or arresting lone paddleboarders.
Jim Jordan pointed out that 63 days of protests in Portland included violence against police officers and burning buildings, while church services involved no such violence. Yet churches faced strict limits while protests did not. In one night in Chicago, 49 police officers were injured during protests, but Fauci still refused to recommend limiting these gatherings.
The Attempt to Remove Trump
The broader context reveals that COVID restrictions were partly designed to damage President Trump politically. Fauci, along with Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Robert Redfield, allegedly cornered Trump by warning that four million Americans would die if he didn't shut down the country. They told him he would be known as "the plague president."
What was presented as "two weeks to slow the spread" was actually "getting their toe in the door to tyranny." The goal was to maintain restrictions as long as possible until everyone received the experimental vaccines.
Why Democrats Can't See the Corruption
The conversation concluded with a comparison to Alan Watts' story about shamans and conquistadors. When Spanish ships arrived in the New World, indigenous people literally couldn't see them because the concept was so far outside their experience. A shaman had to explain in familiar terms what these massive sailing vessels were before people could perceive them.
Similarly, for many Democrats, the level of corruption and lies in institutions like the CDC and NIH is literally unimaginable. They cannot perceive what's right in front of them because it contradicts their fundamental worldview. The system they trusted turned out to be completely filled with lies, and that truth is too large and too threatening to process.
Jim Jordan's Sharp Questioning
The exchange highlighted Jim Jordan's skill as a questioner. Like an experienced attorney, he circled in on the truth, finding contradictions and exposing evasion. His questions were specific, pointed, and impossible to deflect without revealing the political calculations behind COVID policy.
In contrast, many Democratic representatives asked softball questions that allowed Fauci to give rehearsed answers without facing accountability. This difference in questioning quality reflects a broader pattern in congressional oversight.
The Legacy of COVID Restrictions
This July 2020 hearing captured a pivotal moment in the pandemic response. Fauci's evasiveness on protests while he had been dogmatic about every other aspect of life revealed that COVID restrictions were never applied consistently or fairly. They were tools of political power, selectively enforced based on ideology rather than science.
The exchange stands as evidence of how public health authority was corrupted during COVID-19, with officials like Fauci making decisions based on political loyalty rather than objective assessment of disease transmission.
