Up Next
Jesse Weber and Tracy Walder Break Down FBI Investigation Into Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University
30:24
The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: Demands for Transparency in Investigation and Trial Coverage
10:51
Roger Stone Raises Critical Questions About Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation and FBI Timeline
16:49
Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard Clash Over Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation FBI Probe Dispute
Conflicting reports emerge about tensions between FBI Director Kash Patel and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over the investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination. The New York Times claims Patel shut down efforts by Tulsi's advisor Joe Kent to investigate potential foreign intelligence connections to accused assassin Tyler Robinson, while the FBI disputes these characterizations. As court proceedings continue in Utah, new orders reveal Robinson will appear in civilian clothes but remain handcuffed during pre-trial hearings. The case has sparked intense public reaction, with some activists openly celebrating Kirk's death while Turning Point USA rallies to continue his legacy with events featuring Vice President JD Vance and Kirk's widow Erika.
FBI Director Disputes Reports of Investigation Shutdown
The New York Times published a report claiming FBI Director Kash Patel shut down efforts by Joe Kent, the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center and close advisor to Tulsi Gabbard, to investigate potential foreign intelligence connections in the Charlie Kirk assassination case. The Daily Mail picked up the story with an inflammatory headline suggesting an "explosive feud" between Patel and Tulsi Gabbard over the probe into accused assassin Tyler Robinson.
According to the Times report, which cited multiple anonymous sources, Kent examined FBI files in recent weeks to investigate whether Robinson had support from a foreign power or another entity. The inquiry allegedly alarmed Patel and other senior FBI officials who believed Kent was overstepping his authority, treading on the FBI's responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and prosecution of Robinson.
However, Fox News reported that a high-ranking source downplayed the tensions, stating they were exaggerated and that there was no serious dispute between the agencies or their leaders. The FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a joint statement saying they "will leave no stone unturned in the investigation and the assassination of our friend Charlie Kirk."
White House Meetings Address Inter-Agency Tensions
The dispute became serious enough to warrant White House intervention. Two meetings were held to ameliorate tensions between the FBI and Tulsi Gabbard's office. The first meeting, which focused on multiple issues including the Kirk investigation, was described as so tense that very little was accomplished, requiring a second meeting.
Attendees at these high-level meetings included Kash Patel, Joe Kent, Tulsi Gabbard, top Justice Department officials, Vice President JD Vance, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. Kent reportedly told administration officials that a lower-level FBI official gave him access to the agency's files, which Patel said he was not aware of.
The Times reported that some White House officials have pressed for sweeping investigations of liberal groups and donors, including Antifa, with some of the president's allies convinced that Kirk's killing is part of a broader plot despite officials involved in the arrest saying Robinson acted alone.
Defense Attorney Perspectives on Investigation Scope
One potential concern raised about Kent's investigation is that it could provide fodder to defense attorneys who could use the notion that more than one person was involved to raise reasonable doubt in the minds of jurors. If other agencies identify another person, the lone gunman theory could be challenged, creating reasonable doubt for Robinson.
However, Chicago defense attorney Donna argued that broader investigation actually doesn't help the defense. She noted that if agencies didn't conduct thorough investigations, the defense would simply attack them for not being thorough enough. She explained that even if investigators found additional suspects, it doesn't change the core question of whether there is evidence that Robinson shot Kirk.
The FBI and Department of Justice generally keep tight control on these cases to prevent anyone from poking holes in their prosecution. While Robinson currently faces state charges, concerns exist that interference could jeopardize the current investigation and open opportunities for the defense to dismiss the case.
Evidence and Investigation Details
Robinson was identified as the shooter based on security footage and other evidence. Some officials raised questions about the assassin's abilities and training after security footage showed him jumping from a ledge. Early in the investigation, evidence was collected that contained words often associated with Antifa, including inscriptions on bullets.
In documents, Robinson claimed these inscriptions were mostly an internet meme. The counterterrorism center gathered material from intelligence agencies about potential foreign ties to Robinson and also looked at foreign funding of people who identify with the far left movement known as Antifa. President Trump designated Antifa as a terror organization and has said that Robinson was radicalized by the left, though he didn't directly connect him to Antifa.
Under Kent's leadership, the National Counterterrorism Center has taken a higher profile than in past years, issuing warnings about terror attacks, though some suggest he might be pushing into areas traditionally under FBI and CIA jurisdiction.
Court Proceedings and Media Access Orders
Judge Tony Kgraf Jr. issued a nine-page order following a closed hearing on October 24th regarding Tyler Robinson's court appearances and media coverage. The order addressed several significant issues regarding how Robinson will appear in court and what media access will be permitted.
The judge granted Robinson's motion to appear in civilian clothing during pre-trial proceedings, citing concerns about prejudicing potential jurors. The court noted that photographs and visual recordings shared widely could lead potential jurors to associate jail clothing with guilt. The judge expressed particular concern about technological advancements like AI that could allow images to be manipulated.
However, the court denied Robinson's request to appear without restraints, noting that the charges are serious and that showing him as dangerous with handcuffs may undermine his presumption of innocence but is necessary for security. The judge ordered that media will not be allowed to photograph Robinson's hands during proceedings to minimize the visual impact of the restraints.
State Requests to Limit Court Access
In a surprising development, the state prosecutors requested that all non-evidentiary hearings be conducted virtually via WebEx and joined with the defense in requesting limits on electronic media coverage. The judge found these requests not yet ripe for decision and ordered additional briefing on both issues.
The judge expressed that he would not rely on briefing already provided and required the parties to file separate motions explaining the basis for conducting hearings virtually and restricting media coverage. The court also struck a response filed by the sheriff's office, noting that the sheriff is not a party to the case, though the judge indicated he would still consider security concerns raised.
The court issued an amended standing decorum order governing electronic coverage of proceedings. The order specifies that recording or transmitting images or sound of court proceedings without court permission is prohibited, that media representatives must not photograph court employees or Robinson's physical restraints, and that all camera locations are subject to court approval.
Next Steps in the Case
Robinson will be the only defendant in the court holding cell when he appears at special settings scheduled specifically for his hearings. The court determined there is a low likelihood he could not be identified or tracked if there is commotion given these special security arrangements.
Several motions have filing deadlines, with some due November 5th, but the next in-person proceeding is not scheduled until January of next year. Until then, motions will be exchanged back and forth between the parties as the case proceeds through the pre-trial phase.
Activist Celebrates Kirk's Death at Protest March
At a "No Kings March" protest event, a woman identified as Jennifer Welch was captured on video by conservative commentators celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. When asked about Kirk, she stated he was "horrible" and said she was glad he's not here anymore. When pressed about whether she was glad he was dead, she confirmed "yes."
Welch justified her position by saying Kirk was "horrible on the campuses, the college campuses." When asked if she would be glad if the interviewer died as well, she responded "maybe, I'd have to think about it." The woman and her companions laughed during the exchange, treating the subject matter casually.
The video illustrates a disturbing trend where some activists believe that people they consider racists or fascists deserve to die, treating murder as a less serious offense than holding certain political views. Welch later transitioned to threatening Democratic politicians who take AIPAC money, saying "we're coming after you in the same way that we come after MAGA."
Turning Point USA Continues Kirk's Legacy
Despite attempts to end Charlie Kirk's work through violence, Turning Point USA is continuing his mission with major events. Vice President JD Vance appeared at an Old Miss Turning Point USA event alongside Kirk's widow Erika Kirk, with an expected attendance of 10,000 people.
The event took place in Oxford, Mississippi, where crowds began forming hours before doors opened, undeterred by cold rain. The line started forming around 11:00 a.m. local time and stretched beyond visibility. Attendees included Old Miss students, high school students, parents, and local politicians, all expressing determination to keep Kirk's legacy alive.
Old Miss Turning Point Chapter President Leslie Lachman helped organize the event, which marks Erika Kirk's only scheduled campus tour stop. Students expressed honor that she chose their campus and described her as a strong and resilient woman. Vice President Vance's appearance included a speech and an open dialogue with questions from the audience, continuing the format that Charlie Kirk was known for during his campus tours.
Video Transcript
remember's name was
>> Charlie Kirk, ma'am?
>> Yeah, him is horrible.
>> Charlie Kirk is horrible.
>> Yes, I'm glad he's not here.
>> You're glad he's dead?
>> Yes.
>> You know what? I do the exact same
thing. Would you be glad if I would die?
>> Maybe. I'd have to think about it.
>> You should be ashamed of yourself.
>> Be ashamed of yourself.
>> Your friend just said she'd be happy if
I died.
>> FBI coverup story making the rounds. As
you can see, the Daily Mail wrote a
spicy headline here, saying, "Cash
Patel, the FBI director, shuts down the
Charlie Kirk foreign intelligence probe
in an explosive feud with Trump's
counterterror." And the article is
fleshing out this battle between Cash
Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, and this gentleman
down here known as Joe Kent. You can see
here's a photograph of Tulsi and Joe
Kent out there standing next to a
helicopter doing some PT or something.
But now the Daily Mail is saying there
was a probe that was silenced in the
investigation of Charlie Kirk, may he
rest in peace, of the assassination that
removed him way too soon from this
planet. But the report is based on the
New York Times. And the New York Times,
as we know, is very much garbage. And
Fox News is saying the FBI is disputing
the report, saying Cash Patel did not
limit a probe. All of that is being
exaggerated. And so we'll go through the
stories and then we got some updates on
the case itself because we now have the
order that we heard about in court from
the judge that was allowing Tyler
Robinson to wear civilian clothes but
remain in cuffs. We've got that. We've
got the new decorum order. And we have
this maniac lunatic called Jennifer
Welch this week who is celebrating the
death of conservatives and demanding
that Democrats support that concept. So
we'll get into that. We'll hear from her
and get more reaction on what's going on
tonight over at Turning Point. But this
story is all over X right now. People
saying, "Oh, this is very suspicious."
Saying Cash Patel shuts down a foreign
intelligence probe. Not good. But they
deny it. FBI director Cash, they write,
"Crushed efforts by Tulsi's closest
advisor, Joe Kent." And it's based this
headline on this New York Times story.
And so they actually got the sourcing on
this. And here's what they said.
Officials access to the FBI files drew
push back from the FBI. There's Joe Kent
who was looking into all this. And here
they explain three journalists including
Maggie Haberman who has for some weird
reason a lot of access to Trump people
over the years. They write the head of
the National Counterterrorism Center
examined FBI files in the last several
weeks to investigate whether Tyler
Robinson, the guy charged, had support
from someone else, a foreign power or
another entity that came out according
to multiple people with knowledge of the
matter. Now the inquiry was led by Joe
Kent, the director of counterterrorism
working with Tulsi and it alarmed Cash
Patel. they say saying that Patel and
other senior officials thought that Kent
was overstepping, saying, "Hey, that's
our investigation." Treading on the
FBI's responsibilities and potentially
interfering with the investigation and
the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler
Robinson. And one way that might happen,
I'm not sure if they're going to get
into it or not, but the one idea, and
they might get into it, one idea would
be that if the other agencies identify
another person, then the lone gunman
theory goes out the window, and that
creates reasonable doubt for the
currently charged defendant. But if that
is the case, don't you want to know
about these other people who are
involved? You don't just want to put a
nice little bow on your investigation.
Well, we got the guy, lone shooter,
that's it. Case closed. Why don't we go
out for pizza? It needs to be a little
bit more thorough. Obviously, we want
every stone overturned so we can get to
the bottom of this. But you can see how
there might be some interference
concerns because if somebody else comes
in, it's too many cooks in the kitchen.
And you might say, you might jeopardize
our current investigation and open up an
opportunity for the defense to try to
dismiss the case. Now, Robinson is
accused of killing Mr. Kirk last month
as the conservative activist made an
appearance. We know the story. The
Senate did confirm Mr. Kent as the
director of the counterterrorism center.
He's one of the closest advisers to
Tulsi. And here's the story. Mr. Patel
was troubled that Mr. Kent had gone
through the FBI material that was
related to the case. According to people
with knowledge on the matter, Joe Kent's
efforts were a topic at a White House
meeting that happened recently. It
included Mr. Patel Cash, Mr. Kent, and
his direct superior Tulsi Gabbard. FBI,
Joe Kent, and Tulsi all in the room. Top
Justice Department officials were there.
Vice President JD Vance, White House
Chief of Staff Susie Wilds were also
there. According to several people who
spoke to the Times, the people
interviewed by the Times were granted
anonymity to speak frankly. So, we don't
know who, but the FBI and the DOJ, they
generally keep tight reigns on these
cases so that nobody can poke holes in
their case. And while Robinson is
currently facing state charges, Joe
Kent's efforts, they say, could provide
fodder to defense attorneys who could
use the notion that more than one person
was involved to raise reasonable doubt
in the minds of the jurors. Right? Oh,
the lone gunman theory now goes out the
window because Joe Kent and the director
of national intelligence are thinking
maybe there's foreign help or there's an
Antifa group or somebody's funding the
attack. Now, since Kirk's death, some
White House officials have pressed for
sweeping investigations of liberal
groups and donors. Trantifa and other
president's allies outside the
administration are convinced that this
killing is part of a broader plot
despite a lack of evidence to support
that. Officials involved in the arrest
say it's just Mr. Robinson, Tyler
Robinson, the assassin alone, the lone
gunman. Now, Kent Joe told
administration officials that a lower
level FBI official gave him access to
the agency's files, which Patel said he
was not aware of. According to some
people that the New York Times
interviewed in response to questions
from the Times, Mr. Patel and Miss
Gabbard, they released a joint statement
that did not even address the debate
over the inquiry. They responded, they
said, "The FBI and the intelligence
community under the direction of the
president will leave no stone unturned
in the investigation and the
assassination of our friend Charlie
Kirk." All right. But multiple people
said tensions over Mr. Kent Joe's work
with Tulsi had persisted for some time,
part of a broader set of issues. So
maybe Cash is just tired of He's like,
"Man, this dude is always sniffing
around here. Go do your business over
there. I got the FBI covered. Get out."
The meeting that Mr. Kent attended at
the White House was one of two that was
intended to ameliate tensions between
the FBI and Tulsi. The people brief said
the earlier one, which was focused on
multiple issues, included Kirk. It was
so tense that very little was
accomplished. They had to come back a
second time. Now, we know Mr. Robinson
was identified as the shooter. Some
officials inside the government though
raised questions about the assassin's
abilities and the training after
security footage was released showing
him jumping from a ledge. Early in the
investigation, evidence was collected
that contained words often associated
with Antifa writing, namely inscriptions
on the bullets. In the document,
Robinson claimed that they were just
mostly an internet meme. Now, the
counterterrorism center gathered
material from intelligence agencies
about potential foreign ties to Tyler
Robinson and also looked at foreign
funding of people who identify with the
far left as the movement known as
Antifa, all the Soros cash and more. Mr.
Trump has said that Robinson was
radicalized by the left, but he didn't
connect him to Antifa, but did designate
Antifa a terror organization. Now, under
Mr. Kant, the National Counterterrorism
Center has taken a higher profile than
in the years past, issuing warnings
about terror attacks, but he might be
pushing into areas that are in the
jurisdiction of the FBI and the CIA. So,
that's what the Times reported. Then,
Fox News came back out and they said,
"No, no, no, no. We talked to somebody
else." Okay. A high-ranking source is
downplaying all this reporting about
internal tensions between Cash and Joe
over files of this. They say its
director, Joe Kent, the National
Counterterrorism Center, was recently
looking at the assassination case. Yeah.
And that reportedly ruffled feathers.
But the source told Fox News that the
tensions in the report were exaggerated,
as you know, you could expect. And that
there was no serious dispute between the
agencies or their leaders. So Fox
reporting, somebody says that's not
true. They got a statement. They said
the ODNI and the FBI are united in
working with Congress to strengthen our
counter intelligence. Kent was looking
to ties to terror groups, including
Antifa. Patel allegedly took issue into
that and they all had a big meeting with
JD Vance and others. One potential
concern is that this would be less
protective of the investigation. Here's
what a defense attorney says though in
Chicago. This person called Donna says,
"Well, I don't think this helps the
defense in any way." How does it help
the defense? If the agencies didn't do
this, the defense would just attack them
for not conducting a thorough
investigation. Yeah, it's a great point.
You just say, "You just made him the
shooter." The lone gunman theory, you
didn't even investigate anything else.
So, you're just singling him out cuz you
wanted to put a bow on this. But, you
know, defense attorneys are going to
quibble with everything. That's what we
do. So, she said even if investigators
had found additional suspects, it
doesn't change the case. Like, is there
evidence that he shot him or not? Does
it take away from the fact that he was a
shooter? I don't think so. Yeah. I mean,
if they've got DNA, if they've got
evidence, if they've got an admission,
if they got it all, it's like open and
shut. So, if there was a foreign, you
know, operation or foreign connection to
money or whatever, if he's the shooter,
you've got enough evidence for the
shooter. So, all of this is now moving
forward and we've been covering this
case for a while and we've got some
documents now to review, including this
one. So earlier this week, there was a
hearing for Tyler Robinson's case. He of
course is the alleged assassin of
Charlie Kirk. And the judge came back
down and issued this ninepage order.
Gives us some background here. He said,
"Due to the potential disclosure of
court security protocols, we held a
closed hearing on October 24th, and I
was pitching a fit earlier this week
about how we don't have any visuals of
Tyler Robinson in custody appearing at
these court proceedings." And apparently
they held another closed hearing that
maybe we did not attend to. Now Mr.
Robinson, they said, "We discussed a
bunch of things. We stipulated that the
state's motion to conduct all
non-evidentiary hearings virtually and
the request to limit all electronic
media coverage needs further briefing."
And I thought like I misheard that. I
thought what? The state is asking to
conduct all non-evidentiary hearings
virtually. They don't even want to show
up. They just want to zoom in on this.
Okay. and the parties are going to
request all of them together, the state
and the defense to limit electronic
media coverage. Why are the prosecutors
asking for these things? Those issues
are not yet ripe for decision. So, we're
going to brief those further. Now, if
the state wants all non-evidentiary
hearings conducted over WebEx, file a
motion to do that. The court is not
going to rely on the briefing that you
already gave us. File something separate
and we'll get it and see what their
basis is for that. It's ridiculous. The
time for a response and a reply will be
governed by rule. As with all motions,
the parties must file a request. Now, if
you also want to restrict electronic
media coverage, you may file a joint
motion. Why would the prosecutors want
to do that? The court will not rely on
the briefing already provided in their
motion. The parties must add more and
we'll get more information on that once
it's fully briefed. And there's more.
Now, they also the sheriff member added
a response and like the sheriff's not a
party to the case, so we can consider
it, but it's not going to be a part of
the official record. In the future, if
you have a concern about security, don't
add it into the file. You're not a party
to the case. Just tell the prosecution
and the prosecution can add it. You
don't need to submit it. So that's
stricken, but we will also consider that
you have security concerns. Got it. All
right. So that's kind of moot. Then we
talk about his civilian clothing. They
say he moves to appear without
restraints at the other hearings and
they grant him the civilian clothing
rights. The state, they argue that
dressing him in jail clothing is for
safety. But the judge says, "We're going
to balance everything. We think that his
right to a presumption of innocence and
unbiased jury supersedes the security
concerns of dressing in civilian
clothing. It's arguably unprecedented in
the state of Utah. At the point we made
earlier, photographs and visual
recordings will be shared all over the
place. There's a strong likelihood that
a substantial number of potential jurors
in Utah will view these images and may
associate this with guilt, which is just
a wild standard because like there were
pictures of Trump in court every day.
They released a mug shot of Trump in the
middle of a presidential election. I
understand the concept, but it's just
interesting how it's selectively
applied. The danger of prejudice is
compounded by technological advancements
like AI which will allow the images to
be manipulated. So the court intends to
hold all of his hearings as special
settings. Unless unforeseen
circumstances arise, he will be the only
defendant in the court holding cell when
he appears. And again, he hasn't even
appeared yet. He appeared the first
time. We never saw him. There is a low
likelihood that he will not be able to
be identified or tracked if there's
commotion. And so the court orders that
he is dressed in civilian clothing.
We're not going to lose sight of him.
he's going to be the only person here
and he's also going to have to appear
with restraints. Now, he says the
restraints are going to taint the jury
pool, but he says no. This has been a
lot of pre-trial publicity generated
here. As with many cases, public
interest may both wax and wayne, but
it's probably going to persist. Visual
recordings showing that he's dangerous
with the handcuffs on may undermine his
innocence, but the charges are serious.
He shot someone in the neck allegedly,
and so there's going to be a lot of
strong emotions here as well. And so
therefore, we deny Tyler Robinson's
request to be unrestrained during the
pre-trial proceedings. At a trial,
they'll take the handcuffs off, but
during the pre-trial proceedings, he'll
be handcuffed, and the media will not be
allowed to take pictures of his hands.
So, accordingly, the motions are granted
in part, denied in part, signed off on
by Tony Graph Jr. Then we got a new
standing decorum order. This just came
out from the judge as well. And here's
what they say. The purpose of this order
is to allow right now for electronic
coverage of court proceedings. Now,
again, this might be modified later
because both sides are briefing this and
apparently they want to limit access,
which is insane. We'll see what the
judge does. So far, he's allowed at
least the camera to be in there. Have
not seen Tyler Robinson show up on
court, but he says, "Here's the amended
order. Bags, face coverings, dangerous
items, seating, conduct of the
spectators, behave yourself, don't
scream things, use of electronic
devices. What about news? Does the media
is going to be here? Media reps shall
identify themselves and follow the court
rulings. Recording or transmitting
images or sound of court proceedings
without our permission is prohibited.
So, if he says no, it we're cut off.
News reporters need to read it and
understand the locations of cameras are
all subject to court approval. After the
court is appointed pool photographers,
then the media will decide how to pool
the video. The arrangement shall be
reached before proceedings commence. You
all shall use the right equipment. No
media interviews in the courtroom. Media
representatives don't photograph court
employees if he's in physical
restraints. This is the addition. Media
representatives don't record your hands.
Nothing in the lobby. No other
permission to do anything else that we
don't give you permission to do. So,
also signed off on by the judge Tony F.
Graph. And so, as it stands right now,
looks like we're still going to have
media coverage. And we've got some
extensions of time. We've got another
motion that is due November 5th, but
other than that, we're not due back in
this case until we have oral arguments
scheduled in January. So, we got motions
that are going to be back and forth, but
the next in-person proceeding, it's not
until January of next year. But
unfortunately, we have lunatic lefties
like this woman. Her name is Jennifer
Welch, and she is encouraging Democrats
to commit more violence. Here's what she
sounded like, courtesy of our friend
Colin Rug over on X. People are waking
up only in New York City. You're
mistaken. Look at this clip of a wine
mom at the No Kings March. Play the
clip. Whoever's name was
>> Charlie Kirk, ma'am.
>> Yeah, him is horrible.
>> Charlie Kirk is horrible.
>> Yes. I'm glad he's not here.
>> You're glad he's dead?
>> Yes.
>> Why would you say something like that,
ma'am?
>> Yes. He was horrible on the campuses,
the college campuses. Horrible person.
>> You know what? I do the exact same
thing. Would you be glad if I would die?
>> Maybe. I'd have to think about it.
>> You should be ashamed of yourself. be
ashamed of yourself for
>> her friend just said she'd be happy if I
died.
>> Yeah, they all laugh about it. This is a
point we've made before. They think if
you're a racist or a fascist or you're
bad for colleges or something that you
deserve to die. In other words, being a
murderer, killing somebody like this is
less of an offense than being a racist.
If it's be alive and a racist or be dead
and not a racist, they'd rather you be
dead cuz that's how twisted their
humanity is. Now, you can see this lib
woman just laughing in here. And I don't
think this is a joke. I mean, actually,
I don't think she thinks it's a joke
either. Listen to this.
>> So, listen up, Democratic establishment.
You can either jump on board with this
or we're coming after you in the
same way that we come after MAGA.
Period. Stop taking Apac money. Go on an
I'm sorry I took Apac money atonement
tour if
>> So, they're going to shoot you in the
neck or something and wish you were dead
if you take Apac money. I didn't think
that was going there, but they're just
nuts. So, I guess it's Israel money is
what she's so mad about. All right. So,
this is what they're doing. They laugh
about it. There are people out there who
wish you dead. And then she starts to
transition into Apac money. Is that why
they're going to shoot people like
Charlie Kirk in the neck? Sick people.
But the mission marches on. JD Vance is
going to be in attendance at an Old Miss
Turning Point USA event tonight. And it
is jamming over there. expected to have
10,000 people out there pushing forward
the legacy of Charlie Kirk in spite of
these lefties best attempts to end it.
Here's a quick report and scenes from
the facility.
>> All right, right now in Oxford,
Mississippi, a cold rain isn't stopping
the crowds from forming hours before
tonight's Turning Point USA event where
Vice President JD Vance will join Erica
Kirk on stage. Turning Point's Miss
Chapter President Lesie Lachman is
standing by. But first, let's get to our
correspondent, Madison Scarpino, who is
live in Oxford for us. Hi, Madison.
>> Hey, Sandra. Doors don't open for these
attendees for another nearly 2 hours,
but ever since this line started forming
at around 11:00 a.m. local time, you
can't see the end. There is expected to
be around 10,000 people here tonight.
Most people we've talked to are Old Miss
students, of course, but there are also
high school students here, parents,
local politicians, and they're all fired
up. They say they want to keep Charlie
Kirk's legacy alive and they say they're
especially honored that this is his wife
Erica Kirk's only scheduled campus tour
stop. I think she is a very strong
resilient woman and I really look up to
her. We are honestly so truly honored
that she decided to come to Miss has
such a big community and we really
showed out and I really think that this
was the best place she could have come.
>> These students tell me they're also
thrilled to hear from Vice President JD
Vance. The plan is for Erica Kirk to
introduce the VP. He says there will be
a quick speech and as mentioned he then
plans to answer questions and have an
open dialogue just like Charlie did.
>> Nice to see the turnout and the legacy
of Charlie lives on in Turning Point. JD
Vance, Erica Kirk will be there tonight
and I'm sure it's going to be amazing to
watch. So, we'll keep our eye on the
Tyler Robinson case and see what comes
next. But as it stands, we've got a lot
of time left until we have our next
court dates in January. A lot of filings
and motions will be coming in. We'll be
here to cover them. Thank you for
subscribing and joining as we