Up Next
Charlie Kirk Assassination Sparks National Crisis: NewsNation Reports From Utah Valley University Crime Scene
38:28
Washington Post Report on Tyler Robinson Reveals Chilling Details of Charlie Kirk Assassination
14:03
Death Penalty Defense Strategy Breakdown: Bryan Kohberger Case Analysis with Legal Experts Mark Geragos and Ashleigh Merchant
15:40
Legal Experts Analyze Tyler Robinson Court Case and Death Penalty Prospects in Utah Shooting
Legal analysts Mark Geragos, Arthur Aidala, and Jonna Spilbor examine the Tyler Robinson case following his court appearance in Utah. Robinson faces potential death penalty charges after prosecutors determined he caused grave risk when he shot Charlie Kirk. The discussion explores Robinson's lack of cooperation with authorities, his roommate's cooperation with the FBI, and the ethical complexities defense attorneys face when representing clients accused of heinous crimes. The experts share personal experiences about court-appointed cases and debate whether they would take on such a controversial defense, while noting that Robinson's own family turned him in to authorities.
The Case Against Tyler Robinson
Tyler Robinson appeared in court on Tuesday facing serious charges in Utah. According to Utah Governor Cox, Robinson has not confessed to authorities and is not cooperating with the investigation. However, people around him are cooperating, which Governor Cox emphasized as very important to the case.
The FBI confirmed that Robinson's roommate, who is his boyfriend and transitioning from male to female, is cooperating with authorities. Law enforcement needed to investigate the roommate's potential knowledge because Slack messages reportedly indicate the roommate knew the location of at least one weapon. Investigators are working to determine how much the roommate knew before, during, and after the incident.
The Strength of the Prosecution's Case
Legal analyst Mark Geragos assessed that despite Robinson's lack of cooperation, prosecutors already have a strong case built on family members' statements, pictures, and other evidence. He noted that Robinson's family cooperated with authorities, which led to his apprehension in the first place. The confirming of the transitioning roommate's status became relevant to law enforcement's investigation due to the Slack messages and potential knowledge of weapon locations.
Geragos explained that this presents an uphill battle for whoever defends Robinson, given the substantial evidence already gathered through family cooperation and physical evidence.
Defense Attorneys Discuss Representing Difficult Clients
The legal panel discussed the challenges of working with families of people accused of terrible crimes. Criminal defense attorney Jonna Spilbor, who has 32 years of experience, identified two types of parents she encounters in her practice. Most commonly, she sees parents who do not turn their children in and act as enablers, finding excuses and doing everything possible to keep their child out of trouble. Less frequently, she works with parents who do turn their children in, as happened in Robinson's case.
Spilbor gave Robinson's parents credit for turning him in, though she questioned why they didn't see the situation coming to a boil or do anything to stop it. She called Robinson "a piece of garbage" and stated she would turn down his case immediately, saying no amount of money would allow her to do her job properly given her personal feelings about the case.
The Conflict of Interest Problem
Mark Geragos pointed out a critical issue for any defense attorney: they cannot sit with Robinson's family or discuss the case with them because of an enormous and obvious conflict of interest. The family members who cooperated with authorities are now walled off from defense counsel in terms of any case discussion.
Arthur Aidala explained his approach when dealing with such cases, emphasizing that a defense attorney's role is to ensure everyone plays by the rules. If DNA was recovered properly, search warrants were executed correctly, and everything was done legally without law-breaking to catch the defendant, then attorneys can only play with the hand they're dealt. When overwhelming evidence exists, the job becomes working out appropriate dispositions rather than pursuing futile trial strategies.
The Debate Over Defending the Worst Criminals
The panel debated whether they would represent Robinson. Aidala mentioned Texas lawyer Dan Cogdell, who commented he would absolutely represent such clients. Aidala noted he's seen both extremes in the legal profession, recalling Justice Scalia's observation that criminal defense lawyers make choices all the time, often based on whether clients have money.
Geragos took a strong position on defending even the worst defendants, arguing it's essential for the system. He respects lawyers who have areas they won't defend due to strong feelings, but personally believes in defending the worst of the worst zealously. He argued that without zealous defense, prosecutors face no real check on their power. Geragos stated that tyranny and fascism start in the criminal justice system when defendants have attorneys who are just window dressing going through the motions.
He referenced the concept of giving someone "a fair trial, then take them out back and shoot them," rejecting this approach. Instead, he believes the system needs people willing to defend the worst cases zealously to protect everyone's rights.
Personal Examples of Difficult Court Appointments
When asked what they would do if court-appointed to represent Robinson, the attorneys shared personal stories. Aidala recalled that in 1993, the chief judge called his father to represent one of the first World Trade Center bombing defendants. The judge wanted to ensure no reversal on appeal and knew Aidala's father would cross every T and dot every I. His father represented someone who tried to topple the World Trade Center, doing so zealously and with all his heart. The defendant received a 280-year prison sentence.
Aidala's father's appointment created an awkward situation because Arthur was running for city council in New York at the time. His father didn't think it was a good idea to inform him before doing the opening statement, which received widespread coverage. While campaigning door-to-door, people asked if he was related to "that person who's in court right now" representing the bomber, catching Arthur completely off guard.
Geragos shared that in high school, his father was court-appointed to represent a serial killer. His mother and his high school friends were appalled by the appointment. His father accepted because he was court-appointed and because that generation believed deeply in the principle of zealous representation, even for the most despicable defendants.
Death Penalty Determination
The prosecutor has determined that Robinson will face the death penalty in Utah. The basis for this decision is that Robinson caused a grave risk to those around him when he shot Charlie Kirk. This grave risk to bystanders is one of the requirements under Utah law to pursue capital punishment. Notably, Robinson only fired one shot in the incident.
Video Transcript
Tyler Robinson was in uh or is in court
um Tuesday and um let's hear let's go to
ST four and hear what the Utah Governor
Cox said.
He has not confessed to um to
authorities. He he is he is uh he is not
cooperating. Uh but uh but but all the
people around him are cooperating and I
I think that's uh that's that's very
important. Um, there were reports
yesterday that that that uh that we can
confirm that uh that his roommate was
indeed a boyfriend uh who who is
transitioning from uh from male to
female. Uh that's that's information
that the FBI had uh had mentioned
yesterday. Uh we can confirm that as
well and that that uh that he is
cooperating with uh with authorities as
well.
>> Well, Mark Aragos, what do you make of
that so far? Well, look, he's not
cooperating. And I think what they're
saying is is that his family cooperated.
That's how they got to him in the first
place. And obviously, the confirming of
the transitioning roommate would be I
know that that's kind of a hot button,
so to speak. But remember, they have to
go there as law enforcement because if
you believe what's being reported, there
are Slack messages there that appear to
indicate that the roommate knew at least
a location of of one of the weapon. If
that's the case, they clearly law
enforcement is going to run that down.
Clearly, they're going to want to know
how much they knew the roommate knew
before, during, and after. And uh
whether or not this young man is
cooperating or not, it uh it appears
that they've got um quite a case already
just based on the family members
statements and some of the pictures and
other things. So this is quite an uphill
battle for the person who's defending.
>> J and we'll talk about who's defending
in a minute. Um Johnny, you you've
represented thousands of people at this
point in your career. give people a
little insight on what it's like dealing
with the parents or the significant
others of someone who clearly did a bad
thing or a horrible thing um maybe took
someone's life away in a DWI accident or
all the kinds of crazy cases you handle.
just give folks who are watching or
listening what it's like for you and
being in Mark when you're sitting there
with the family and they're dealing with
with what did my kid do or what did my
husband do or what did my wife do.
>> First, let me just get this off my
chest. Tyler Robinson is a piece of
[ __ ] Number one. Number two, I in my
career, which is 32 years long at this
point, there are two types of parents
that I have.
>> You started She started practicing law
at 10, folks. Just
>> I did. That's right. I was nine.
>> So, there are two types of parents.
More often than not, the parents that I
have experienced
are those that do not turn their child
in. those who actually are, for lack of
a better word, enablers. Those who will
find excuses, those who will pull out
every stop to make sure that uh little
Susie cream cheese does not um get in a
whole host of trouble, whether it's
something big or small. I have not had
the privilege as often to work with
parents who are just the opposite. I
mean, these parents turned this piece of
[ __ ] in. And to that, I have to give
them credit where credit is due. While I
I think it's terrible that they did not
see this happening, why they did not see
this this this coming to a boil, why
they didn't couldn't do anything to stop
it. I mean, I'm I'm making a lot of
supposition here, but I will give them
credit for turning this person in. And
can I just also little sidebar
>> by the way, John, I was just going to
say the one problem here to Arthur's
question. If you're sitting with the
family, the problem you would have as a
defense lawyer, I'm not telling you two
anything you don't know. You're not
going to be sitting with the family.
You're not going to be talking to them
about this case. You have
>> Yeah. The they're they're done. They're
they are walled off from you in terms of
anything discussing this case because
there is the most enormous obvious
conflict you will ever have.
>> Absolutely. And that's another great
point. And can I just ask that like I've
represented some and and you guys even
more than me have represented some
hardened criminals, some unlikable
people over the course of our career.
This is a case I'm going to tell you
right now that I would turn down faster
than you could say don't. I would turn
it down. I would not. No matter what I,
you know, and look, his attorneys, he's
going to have some and they're going to
have a tough a tough job, but I would
say absolutely not. What would you guys
do?
>> Um, I don't know. You know, I I I I
don't have your reaction. Um, I've been,
believe me, I've been in those
situations and and for the most part,
I've taken them I've taken it on the
challenge and all of that. Look, my Oh,
now I'm going to start pontificating.
But my job, my role is to make sure
everyone's playing by the rules. If this
kid did it and there's DNA and there's
DNA and there's this, if it was the DNA
was recovered properly, if the search
warrants were done properly, if
everything was done the right way, no
one's breaking any laws to get this guy
because of who the victim is, then the
the truth is you can only play with the
hand that you're dealt. So if there's
all of these things proving his guilt,
you don't say, "Okay, kid, let's go to
trial and you know, it'll be a long
plea." Sometimes they make you do that
or let's work out some kind of
disposition like the the case we covered
where the kid croninberg, you know, he
just all right, let's just plead a life
and you know, you'll live the rest of
your life in prison. Um, but I don't
know if I would be jumping. I'm not put
it this way. I'm not putting any feelers
out there uh to represent Tyler
Robinson. Mark, I'd like to hear your
answer to the question. You know, I saw
I I became a fan during the um Ten
Paxton impeachment of a lawyer down in
Texas, Dan Cogwell, uh who's now
somebody has got him doing Tik Toks and
I uh apparently it's in my uh my feed
and I watch them and he uh commented
that he would absolutely represent and
and and I have heard
>> both that extreme and I remember rather
fondly Scalia talking about, well, of
course, criminal defense lawyers make
choices. They make choices all the time
on whether or not the client has money.
And so the I mean, and I used to chuckle
when I would hear the the late great
Scalia say that. And I think in our
system, I uh I will tell Janna because I
know a lot of lawyers, criminal defense
lawyers who have kind of verboten um red
flag areas they won't defend. And I
respect that and I get that because they
feel so strongly. I feel strongly about
the system. I think I tilt more towards
the cogndale uh side that you need
defense lawyers who are not going to
play judge and jury who are going to
zealously defend because otherwise
prosecutors
if you don't defend the worst of the
worst and if you don't do it zealously
then that's the to my mind I always
laugh when people talk about tyranny or
fascism or things like that I always say
it starts in the criminal justice
system. If you have people who are to to
uh quote the Brandon Sullivan, the
potted plants or window dressing or
whatever you want to call it, um who's
just there to kind of go through the
motions, um or as I say to jurors, we're
going to take him, we're going to give
him a fair trial, then take them out
back and shoot him. I I I don't go I
don't subscribe to that. I think you
need people who are going to defend the
worst of the worst and do it zealously.
>> I agree. You need people who will defend
the worst of the worst. And
>> J says it's not going to be her
>> and it's just not going to be it's not
going to be our 32year-old Janna.
>> No, it's not going to be me. In this
particular case, I don't nothing really
is off limits. This case though, I would
be doing this [ __ ] a disservice cuz I
just in my soul there's not enough money
in the world that would allow me to do
my job the way I normally would do my
job. I would say no.
>> I'm going to make it even tougher for
you. What if the court called you up and
appointed you and said we can't
>> which is what is ju just to fill people
in because I was going to bring that up
because my people in my office here who
aren't lawyers said you know who's going
to represent him I said the court is
going to call look I'll tell you the
truth it happened to my dad I don't know
20 some odd years ago when 1993 the
first words world trade center bombing
and they caught the guys and the chief
judge called my dad and said look Luke
and he complimented me he goes I want to
make sure there's no reversal here and
you know after these guys are convicted
and I know you'll cross every tea and
dot every dot eye and I want you to to
remen my dad had to stand there and
represent a guy who blew up or tried to
topple the World Trade Center in 1993
and he did it zealously and with all his
heart and this guy got sentenced to 280
years I think it was in prison but um it
does
>> it's amazing our parallel lives I I
remember in high school my father
getting appointed on a guy on a a serial
killer And my my mother being just
literally appalled in high school and my
friends being appalled and he did it
because he was courtappointed and it's
you know they they back that generation
believed that in their heart and soul.
>> Yeah. I'll just before we move on I was
running for city council at the time in
New York and my dad didn't think it was
a good idea to let me know he was doing
the opening statement. That was all over
the place. So I'm ringing the bell going
Arthur Idol. I'm running.
Are you related to that [ __ ] who's in
court right now? Representative, what
are you talking about? I have no idea
what you're talking about. Oh, that
that's not what happened. Well, to to
put a little bow on all of this,
Robinson is uh going to face the death
penalty in Utah. The the prosecutor has
determined that he caused a grave risk
to those around when he shot Charlie
Kirk. And that is one of the
requirements to get uh the um to get the
death penalty. You know, he only fired
one shot.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.