Senator Josh Hawley Exposes How Biden Administration Concealed Thousands of COVID-19 Wuhan Lab Documents From Congress
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Donald Trump on Viktor Orbán, World Leaders, and the Threat to Democracy Under Biden-Harris
1:41
Lara Trump Shares Personal Reflections on Donald Trump After Assassination Attempt at Republican National Convention
20:24
Senator Josh Hawley Confronts Dr. Anthony Fauci Over Cash Awards During COVID-19 Pandemic
9:14
Senator Josh Hawley Exposes How Biden Administration Concealed Thousands of COVID-19 Wuhan Lab Documents From Congress
Senator Josh Hawley questioned a congressional task force witness about the Biden administration's response to a unanimous 2023 law requiring declassification of all information linking the Wuhan Institute of Virology to COVID-19 origins. The administration delivered only five heavily redacted pages despite possessing over 2,000 pages of relevant documents. The witness testified under oath that the conclusions in the government's report were false, revealing how Dr. Anthony Fauci intervened to influence the intelligence community's assessment by recommending scientists who supported the natural origin theory. Hawley characterized the administration's actions as a deliberate cover-up and violation of federal law, arguing that when officials can blatantly disregard congressional statutes and mislead the public without consequence, democratic accountability ceases to exist.
Senator Hawley Confronts Witness About Missing Wuhan Lab Documents
Senator Josh Hawley opened his questioning by reminding the witness and the committee that in March 2023, the Senate unanimously passed legislation he authored requiring the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to declassify "any and all information related to potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of COVID-19." The legislation also passed the House unanimously before President Biden signed it into law.
The law established a statutory deadline just a couple of months after passage, which the Biden administration ignored. When the administration finally released their report, it consisted of only five pages, heavily redacted, with one page serving merely as a cover note. Hawley displayed the sparse document to illustrate the inadequacy of the government's response to a law requiring "any and all information."
Witness Reveals Thousands of Hidden Documents
The witness, Mr. Erdman, who served on a task force reviewing COVID-19 origin documents, confirmed that the five-page report did not represent all the information the United States government possessed. He explained that a classified report was being written at the time the law passed, and he assumed officials would simply redact that existing report and release it. Instead, the National Intelligence Council decided to write an entirely different paper.
When Hawley pressed for details about the volume of withheld information, Erdman revealed that Director Tulsi Gabbard was working through approximately 2,000 pages in the first batch alone for potential release. He clarified that while the law mandated releasing "any and all" information, there remained a requirement to protect sources and methods. However, he emphasized there were "many, many more" documents beyond even the initial 2,000 pages.
Director Haynes' Response Contradicted by Evidence
Hawley shared correspondence he and Senator Braun received from Director Avril Haynes following the inadequate report release. Haynes claimed the administration had declassified "only what we could without endangering sources and methods." This explanation appeared deliberately misleading given the existence of thousands of relevant documents.
While Erdman stated he had no direct proof that Haynes personally made the decision to withhold the material, he acknowledged it was her office, her signature on the letter, and her office that sent the five pages. The witness confirmed Haynes was the one who claimed the five-page summary represented all available information.
False Conclusions in the Government Report
Hawley outlined two key claims made in the five-page report. First, it stated that nothing researched at the Wuhan lab could plausibly be a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2. Second, it claimed there was no evidence of any research-related incident involving Wuhan employees that might have been related to the pandemic.
When asked whether these statements were true based on his review of the actual documents, Erdman testified under oath that they were not true. He indicated that while some details would need to be discussed in a classified setting, the conclusions presented to the public were false.
Hawley Defines the Conduct as a Cover-Up
The Senator summarized three violations by the administration. First, they deliberately violated a law passed by Congress and signed by the President ordering release of all Wuhan lab information. Second, they violated the law again by withholding thousands of pages they possessed at the time and knew were covered by the statute. Third, the conclusions they released to the public were false.
Hawley declared that if officials can blatantly violate statutes and lie to the American people without consequence, the country no longer functions as a democracy. He argued that when unelected officials in the intelligence community can operate with such impunity, the people are no longer in charge.
Dr. Fauci's Behind-the-Scenes Intervention
Hawley referenced Erdman's opening statement about Dr. Anthony Fauci intervening to influence what information the intelligence community could review during their initial assessments of whether the Wuhan lab was linked to COVID-19. The witness clarified that Fauci provided a list of scientists and subject matter experts he recommended the intelligence community consult.
While Fauci didn't technically have the power to mandate these consultations, the bureaucracy at the time was receptive to his recommendations despite concerns raised by individuals within the intelligence community. At least one person questioned whether it was appropriate to accept such guidance from a policy maker rather than maintaining an independent intelligence cycle.
Erdman confirmed that Fauci held a clear point of view: he believed in the natural origin theory and continues to maintain that position. Hawley noted the conflict of interest, pointing out that Fauci had supported gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, lied about it to Congress repeatedly, and had "dirty hands" in the matter. Yet despite this compromised position, Fauci intervened behind the scenes to stop the intelligence community from accurately assessing the evidence.
The Crisis of Public Trust
Hawley expressed disbelief at the scope of the deception, noting it extended beyond Fauci's public statements to active interference with intelligence community operations. He connected this pattern of dishonesty to the broader crisis of trust between the American people and their elected officials.
The Senator emphasized that the committee had only scratched the surface of the issue and thanked the chairman for calling the hearing. He stressed the significance of having a witness testify under oath that the government's official report lied to the American people and contained false information. Hawley concluded by stating the country faces a serious problem that has not yet begun to be solved, highlighting the fundamental threat to democratic accountability when officials can violate laws and mislead the public without consequences.
