Six Lies Social Media Tells Us About Violence, Truth, and Charlie Kirk's Death

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Tyler Robinson Charged With Murder in Charlie Kirk Shooting: DNA Evidence, Discord Group, and the Ideology That Drove the Assassination

Tyler Robinson Charged With Murder in Charlie Kirk Shooting: DNA Evidence, Discord Group, and the Ideology That Drove the Assassination

1:04:14

Victor Davis Hanson Dismantles Left's False Narratives About Charlie Kirk Assassination on Utah Campus

Victor Davis Hanson Dismantles Left's False Narratives About Charlie Kirk Assassination on Utah Campus

7:26

Piers Morgan Uncensored Panel Debates Political Violence After Charlie Kirk Assassination and America's Dangerous Turning Point

Piers Morgan Uncensored Panel Debates Political Violence After Charlie Kirk Assassination and America's Dangerous Turning Point

1:30:11

Six Lies Social Media Tells Us About Violence, Truth, and Charlie Kirk's Death

The assassination of Charlie Kirk exposed six dangerous lies that social media algorithms embed into our consciousness daily. From curated news feeds that present conflicting versions of reality to the amplification of fringe voices that make us believe entire political movements celebrate murder, these distortions are tearing society apart. The shooter's bullet casings, covered in nihilistic internet memes, reveal a generation lost to brain rot and chaos. Yet embodied Christian community offers a counterweight to algorithmic rage—a place where we can be wrong together, confess our sins, and worship the name above every name instead of political figures.

Categories: Analysis
September 18, 2025

The Murder That Revealed Our Fractured Reality

The cold-blooded murder of Charlie Kirk sent shockwaves through social media, but the reactions revealed something even more disturbing than the violence itself: we're living in completely different realities. People on the left celebrated it openly, with some claiming the left has become the party of murder. But beneath the outrage lies a more insidious problem—social media is feeding us six fundamental lies that are destroying our ability to perceive truth, connect with each other, and maintain a functioning society.

These aren't lies that anyone explicitly articulates. They're embedded in the algorithms, reinforced with every scroll, and hypercharged by platforms designed to keep us engaged at any cost. Understanding these lies is essential if we hope to escape the trap.

Lie One: This Is Him

In videos discussing the Charlie Kirk assassination, countless people have said they can't believe Charlie Kirk is being held up as an example because "he is the guy who..." and then they paint a portrait that seems completely unfamiliar to others who followed him.

Nate Morgan Lockach, whose Reformed Mythologist channel is worth checking out, said he had no idea Charlie Kirk was a Christian until after he died. His social media feeds sometimes showed Charlie Kirk doing political things, but never preaching the gospel. For some people, all they see is Charlie Kirk preaching the gospel. For others, all they see is Charlie Kirk defending free speech. For still others, all they see is Charlie Kirk saying things about race and immigration that he shouldn't have said.

If that's your social media diet, how can you conclude anything except that Charlie Kirk is a hater? We live in social media silos where we have curated news feeds. We don't just have alternative worldviews or alternative tastes—there are alternative facts out there for us to discern. The algorithm tells you "this is him," but it's telling your friend something completely different. That sense of fracture is being algorithmically hypercharged.

Lie Two: This Is You

Social media brings very near any kind of event, as long as it happens within sight of a smartphone. That video footage enters your world and gets inside your head at the speed of a click, even when you weren't looking for it.

Scrolling through Twitter looking for information about what happened to Charlie Kirk, suddenly his murder appears on the screen. Everyone said the same thing: they were not prepared to see his murder. The algorithm served it up anyway. How can that not give you a sense of the nearness of the horror?

In a print media age, we would have read a story about something that happened in Utah, and that event would still be just as awful. But to see it in real time from multiple angles makes millions of people think "this is me" and feel the nearness of the threat and potential for violence—perhaps a nearness not borne out by reality.

There's an apocryphal story about April 16th, 1912. The Aberdeen Journal supposedly ran a headline the day after the Titanic sank that simply said "Aberdeen Man Drowns at Sea." While that's not actually true—the Aberdeen Journal did lead with the Titanic—it points to this truth: what is local to us is obviously of most interest to us. But if the Titanic had sunk in a social media age, we would completely forget about the Aberdeen man who drowned at sea. The spectacle of tragedy on the other side of the world would be brought incredibly near and make everybody think they could never go on a cruise ship again.

"This is you" is a distortion. When it happens amid incidents of political violence, it makes everybody feel that violence is right near to us—as close as our smartphone. That's not true, but that's the second lie.

Lie Three: This Is That

Social media invites us to make press releases on a daily basis. We are all our own spin doctors, riding our favorite hobby horses. Then an image comes to us from the other side of the world, and we're tempted to say "this is that."

Remember the Covington High kid from 2017 at the March for Life? He happened to be wearing a MAGA hat when a Native American beat a drum in his face. A snapshot captured this kid not knowing what to do, frozen in the middle of a smile. The image went around the world at the speed of a click, and millions of people suddenly believed this kid was smirking at a First Nations tribal leader because it fit the narrative.

We're constantly being invited by social media to see little snapshots from around the world with contexts we know nothing about, but they fit into our own narrative. We want to use these as jumping-off points for sermons we were going to preach anyway. We ride a hobby horse and we'll be riding that hobby horse long after the image has faded away. On social media, beware the "this is that" fallacy.

Lie Four: This Is Them

This has always been them. This is the platonic ideal of what they are always like. Right now, it's straightforward to troll through TikTok and find any number of people celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk and thinking he had it coming to him. That is appalling. It is imbecilic. It speaks of psychological and spiritual dysfunction on a level that does enrage.

But social media constantly invites you to be enraged at "them," to quote-tweet them and say "this is them." This deluded TikToker is them—the other side. Elon Musk tweets things like "the left is the party of murder," as though the left is celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk. Yet it's straightforward to find very well-balanced and helpful comments by those on the left—Bernie Sanders, AOC, Barack Obama, and other left-leaning people having appropriate reactions to this moment.

Social media gives a megaphone to anyone with the most fringe views. The most fringe views get amplified because if it enrages, it engages. That used to be the old saying about print media: "If it bleeds, it leads." The sensational thing gets forwarded in print media. Social media has hypercharged that principle. If it enrages, it engages.

The man who owns Twitter is the worst offender. Addressing a march where Tommy Robinson asked him to comment on the events, instead of being the grown-up in the room, he fell instantly for the "this is them" fallacy, inviting over 100,000 people demonstrating in London to do the same.

He said: "You see how much violence there's on the left with our friend Charlie Kirk getting murdered in cold blood this week and people on the left celebrating it openly. The left is the party of murder and celebrating murder. Let that sink in for a minute. That's who we're dealing with here. This is a message to the reasonable center—the people who ordinarily wouldn't get involved in politics, who just want to live their lives. My message is to them: if this continues, that violence is going to come to you. You will have no choice. You're in a fundamental situation here where whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die. You either fight back or you die. And that's the truth."

A profoundly unhelpful speech, committing all sorts of fallacies, including the "this is them" fallacy. Let's not fall for it ourselves.

Lie Five: This Is Nothing

Here we need to talk about Tyler Robinson, the shooter who engraved onto his bullet casings any number of conflicting internet memes. Many people are calling this "posting" as a political assassination. An article by Ryan Broderick and Adam Bumas titled "Charlie Kirk Was Killed by a Meme" offers helpful insights.

The use of memes in political mass violence started in earnest in 2019 when a man filmed himself attacking a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand. Just before he started, he told viewers, "Subscribe to PewDiePie," the biggest YouTuber at the time. Months later in Halle, Germany, an attacker live-streamed the shooting of a synagogue on Twitch. In 2022, an 18-year-old white nationalist live-streamed a shooting in a grocery store in Buffalo, New York. Investigators discovered he was planning it openly on 4chan and Discord, calling it a "real life effort post." Last year, Luigi Mangione allegedly gunned down United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson with bullets that read "Deny, Defend, Depose." Days later, a 15-year-old posed for a photo flashing the right-wing okay hand symbol before allegedly carrying out a school shooting in Madison, Wisconsin. Just last month, a shooter in Minneapolis used bullets with messages from all around the political spectrum, including "I am the Joker baby," "Why so serious?" and the simplified line version of the loss JPEG meme.

According to law enforcement, the messages on bullet casings believed to have belonged to Robinson were equally politically confusing. The bullet that struck and killed Kirk had "notices bulge—OwO what's this?" written on its casing, a reference to a longtime internet joke that originally comes from text-based furry roleplay. It's not proof that Robinson was a furry—the meme has long since become part of the extremely online canon.

This does not explain all of Robinson's motives. He had told family members that he thought Charlie Kirk was full of hate and he couldn't be reasoned out of it. It appears Tyler Robinson identified hate in Charlie Kirk and wanted to stop him with a bullet. The variety of confusing memes doesn't mean this wasn't politically motivated, but it does mean Tyler Robinson was lost in more ways than one. He was lost to an ideology that believes violence can end speech. But he was also lost to utter nihilism, to brain rot, to posting.

The article draws attention to links between shootings and meme culture, concluding: "All of it is now just another meme you can participate in to go viral, made even more confusing by a new nihilistic accelerationist movement that delights in muddying the waters for older people who still adhere to a traditional political spectrum. Many young extremists now believe in a much simpler binary: order and chaos. And if you are spending any time at all trying to derive meaning from violent acts like this, then you are by definition their enemy."

That's the fifth lie: this is nothing. It's a lie Tyler Robinson bought into. It's a lie many others are lost to, and it's killing us. We shrug our shoulders at brain rot, but in a nihilistic frame, in a godless frame, what else is brain rot except soul rot? We are giving ourselves and our children over to a world of brain rot, a world that says "this is nothing."

There is danger in ideologies that glorify violence and permit violence in the name of that ideology. But it's also extremely dangerous: a nihilism that permits violence because "this is nothing." That's the fifth lie, and it's all over our online world.

Lie Six: This Is Everything

If you're online as much as most people are, you're receiving a diet of this stuff on a daily basis, algorithmically tweaked, refined, and supercharged to push your buttons in a way that is bespoke for you. All the algorithm wants is for you to stay at the computer, to stay glued to your screen, to keep scrolling. That's all it wants.

It's found that the way to keep you glued is to enrage you. It turns out that will tether you to your device more than seeing attractive naked people. We used to think sex sells. What we found is something better: rage. These algorithms have figured out that the best way to get engagement and more ads is to figure out your political leanings and then take you as far as they can—tweet by tweet, reel by reel, or TikTok by TikTok—to an extreme.

Now that two-thirds of Americans get their news from social media, the temperature has just gone up. Search your feelings. You know this to be true. More than lust, which is a problem all its own, anger will keep you addicted to the machine. We're tempted to believe this sixth lie: this is everything. But it's really not.

The Antidote: Embodied Christian Community

Last night, a church gathered to help Christians get better at sharing their faith. One training exercise involved using the line, "That's what I love about my church." There are so many things people love about their church. There is this embodied community where we get to meet people from all kinds of different walks of life. Some have a social media diet that paints Charlie Kirk in one way. Some have a social media diet that paints Charlie Kirk in a totally different light. And we get to come together.

When we come together on a Sunday morning, we get to hit reset. We get to say the problem is me. We get to confess our sins out loud together. We can talk about how "I've beenaspirin this week, and you've been aspirin this week. We've all been wrong this week." Doesn't that recalibrate your heart?

Instead of being right online, you can show up in church and be wrong. Instead of an online world where you're trying to look good in the presence of judgment, you can come to church and look bad in the presence of love. Never have we needed embodied community across racial lines, across ideological lines. Never have we needed the church of Jesus Christ more than right now.

If Charlie Kirk and the social media coming from Charlie Kirk meant you ended up in church on a Sunday, praise God. But if you leave that church because it didn't mention the name of Charlie Kirk, that's not even what Charlie Kirk would have wanted. Church is the place where we refocus on the name above every name, where we challenge the lies we've been telling ourselves all week, where we come clean in front of one another. We drop the act. We stop trying to look good in the presence of judgment. We start looking bad in the presence of love.

We worship a Jesus who descended into the mess to be with us, to be with us all, to be for us, to be for us all, and to lead us in a truth that comes from beyond. Have you investigated the truth of Jesus yet? There's a great way of doing that called 321. You can go to 321course.com and see life according to Jesus. Plenty of people have done it since the Charlie Kirk event. Some people are finding faith right now because the Charlie Kirk events have awakened them to their spiritual need. They've done 321, come to Christ, and now they want to go to church.

Could that be you? Could that be your friends? Perhaps you should do it as a Christian and then pass it on to your friends. Go to 321course.com and discover life according to Jesus.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!