Steven Crowder Exposes Leftist Streamer Destiny's Call for Conservatives to Fear Death at Events
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Matt Walsh Calls Charlie Kirk Assassination an Act of LGBT Terrorism Demanding Federal Crackdown
25:26
New Poll Shows Liberals Support Political Violence at Much Higher Rates Than Conservatives After Charlie Kirk Assassination
2:46:21
Kim Iversen Exposes Hypocrisy as Both Parties Embrace Cancel Culture After Charlie Kirk Assassination
24:53
Steven Crowder Exposes Leftist Streamer Destiny's Call for Conservatives to Fear Death at Events
Steven Crowder dissects a viral clip from leftist streamer Destiny, who argued that conservatives need to be afraid of getting killed at public events to force their leaders to "turn down the temperature." Crowder dismantles this premise by highlighting the extensive security measures conservative figures already require, contrasting Destiny's minimal security needs with the millions spent protecting events like "Change My Mind." He emphasizes that conservatives do fear for their safety but demonstrate courage despite it, while Destiny's rhetoric reveals the left has lost the ideological battle and resorted to intimidation. Crowder frames Destiny's statement against the UN's definition of terrorism and calls for lawful self-defense while encouraging peaceful, respectful protest.
Destiny's Argument: Conservatives Should Fear for Their Lives
Destiny, a prominent leftist YouTuber and streamer, made waves with a controversial statement: conservatives need to be afraid of getting killed when they attend events. He argued this fear would compel conservative leaders to "turn down the temperature" of political rhetoric. Destiny criticized conservatives for lacking this fear and suggested the left's approach is more aggressive, claiming conservatives are "infinitely hyped up on their civil war machine" while the left "just rolls over."
Steven Crowder's Response: Conservatives Do Fear—But They Have Courage
Steven Crowder strongly disagreed with Destiny's premise, emphasizing that conservatives absolutely do fear for their safety at public events. He pointed out that many conservative figures—including Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, and Jordan Peterson—require significant security measures at public appearances. The critical difference Crowder highlighted is that conservatives demonstrate courage despite their fears, while Destiny and his followers lack this courage.
Crowder noted that Charlie Kirk was so careful about protecting his children that he would never allow front-facing photos of them on social media—always ensuring they faced away from cameras. In contrast, leftists often publicly parade their families, treating them as accessories. This stark difference in behavior, Crowder argued, reveals who genuinely fears for their safety and who does not.
Comparing Security Needs: The Left vs. The Right
Crowder provided a compelling visual comparison: footage of Destiny conducting his own version of "Change My Mind" showed him sitting on a college campus with no visible security. Crowder contrasted this with his own "Change My Mind" segments, which have required millions of dollars in security costs over the years—with tens of thousands spent on individual events alone. The footage showed multiple security personnel positioned around Crowder's setup, with some intentionally kept off-camera for strategic reasons.
"We've had four, so we kind of have to jerry-rig it," Crowder explained, describing the security arrangements that have become necessary at conservative events. "We'll never show you how many are around—those are just the ones you guys have seen because they've had to take out the trash a few times."
Destiny himself, Crowder noted, has apparently not needed any security at times, and certainly not to the level required by conservative speakers. This discrepancy undermines Destiny's claim that conservatives don't fear violence.
Context Doesn't Help: The Full Clip Makes It Worse
Anticipating the inevitable "out of context" defense from the left, Crowder played an extended version of Destiny's remarks. Far from improving the situation, the additional context only reinforced the troubling nature of his statements.
In the fuller clip, Destiny continued: "The question you should ask is, why is nobody on the right afraid enough to say, 'Hey, Trump, can you like tone it down a little bit, bro? We're getting killed out here.' Like, literally, can we like chill? It's unacceptable that that feeling doesn't exist over there... And the reason why it doesn't is because they're just like infinitely hyped up on their civil war machine and then everybody on the left just rolls over on it."
Crowder responded directly: "No, no, no, no. You don't fear being killed because we don't do it. And you guys don't roll over. You commit acts of violence." He referenced not only the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, but also the widespread violence of the George Floyd riots—which resulted in billions of dollars in damages and thousands of casualties.
The closest comparison the left can make, Crowder argued, is January 6th, where the only person shot was a protester. "It's not even close. It's never even been close," he stated.
Defining Terrorism: Does Destiny's Rhetoric Qualify?
Crowder read the United Nations' definition of terrorism: "As a minimum, terrorism involves the intimidation or coercion of populations or governments through the threat or perpetration of violence, causing death, serious injury, or the taking of hostages."
He then asked whether Destiny's statement—"people on the right need to be afraid... We need them to be afraid"—meets this definition. Crowder drew a visual parallel by showing footage of Osama bin Laden addressing the American people with threats, asking viewers to notice the similarities in rhetoric: making people afraid to speak, afraid to assemble, afraid of death.
"Not just be afraid to speak, be afraid of death, right? They should be afraid to die when they go to these rallies," Crowder summarized. "That's what he's saying. And by rallies, we mean conversations."
The Tame Nature of Conservative Events
Crowder emphasized that events like "Change My Mind" represent the tamest possible form of political engagement—simply having conversations with people, debating ideas, going back and forth on beliefs. "That's the bedrock of this society," he argued. Yet even this fundamental exercise in free speech apparently requires people to fear for their lives, according to Destiny's logic.
Courage vs. Fear: What Destiny Misses
One of Crowder's colleagues made a crucial point: Destiny's premise is fundamentally flawed. "He said that the people on the right aren't afraid. They don't fear. They do fear," the colleague noted. "The difference is... what he's angry about is that the right has courage."
Crowder agreed: "That's what he doesn't have. And he's angry." The distinction isn't that conservatives don't fear—they clearly do, given the extensive security measures they require. The distinction is that conservatives proceed with courage despite that fear, while Destiny lacks both the fear (because he faces minimal threats) and the courage to acknowledge the asymmetry.
Conceding the War of Ideas
Crowder argued that Destiny's rhetoric reveals something deeper: "People like Destiny have conceded the war of ideas. They have lost." When the last resort is to intimidate the opposing side into silence, it means intellectual defeat.
"We genuinely have never called for leftists, for liberals who are having conversations to be banned," Crowder emphasized. "We want as many people to hear them as possible because the more they speak, the more we win. I want people to be able to look at a side-by-side, the original, the copy, and see who's better and see who has the better ideas."
A Clear Statement on Violence and Self-Defense
Crowder made his position unambiguous: "Please do not even disrupt the left's events if they're having conversations or lectures. Do not." He expressed hope that Destiny never needs the level of security conservative speakers require, and that he can continue to speak freely and have people hear his point of view.
However, Crowder was equally clear about the other side of the equation: "Just as surely, I hope that any minions who come over from that kind of program to disrupt or commit acts of violence at my events or any conservative's event is terrified because they might meet a bullet and at the very least a tase and tackle."
He clarified: "I don't want anyone to go to his events and be violent. I want anyone who even thinks of that when coming to ours to be petrified, to have to be willing to risk life and limb just as we have for speaking."
Crowder characterized this as advocating for lawful violence—self-defense—and noted that people who have disrupted conservative events "have been afforded grace that they would never have been afforded if it was just taking place at a crosswalk or in a restaurant. That era is over."
"No one would blame you for defending yourself," he concluded. "It's your moral obligation to do so."
The Fundamental Asymmetry
The discussion highlighted a fundamental asymmetry in American political discourse: conservative speakers require millions in security to have simple conversations on college campuses, while leftist streamers can conduct similar events with minimal protection. This reality contradicts Destiny's claim that conservatives don't fear violence—they clearly do, but they demonstrate courage in the face of that fear.
Crowder's analysis suggests that when one side resorts to advocating for fear and intimidation rather than better arguments, it signals their defeat in the marketplace of ideas. The proper response, he argued, is not to mirror that intimidation but to continue speaking with courage while maintaining the right to lawful self-defense.
