The BIGGEST ACCUSATION gets CONFIRMED!!!! ERIKA must be in FULL PANIC!

[00:00] Generally speaking, when my face looks

[00:01] like this at the beginning of the video,

[00:02] it means that I have something that I

[00:04] know my audience is going to be very

[00:06] interested in. And in this case, it is

[00:07] directly related to what we've been

[00:09] talking about in the TPUSA and Wolves

[00:11] and Finance unfolding conflict related

[00:14] to the season. Now, when they started

[00:16] sending seasons to both Candace and

[00:18] Wolves and Finance, I knew it was going

[00:19] to blow up in their face. I knew it was

[00:21] going to blow up in their face for sure.

[00:23] And the reason that I knew that is

[00:24] because I understand the nature of both

[00:26] of the people who received them.

[00:28] Candace, it's not hard to predict.

[00:31] Candace only has one speed. She is a

[00:32] hammer and she is looking for nails. If

[00:35] you pop yourself out of the wood and

[00:36] you're like, "Hello, Candace. I'm a

[00:38] nail." Guess what she's going to do?

[00:40] She's going to hammer you. There is no

[00:42] question about this. Now, when it comes

[00:44] to Wolves and Finance, I actually talked

[00:45] about my read yesterday. And you know

[00:47] what? I actually have a point to make

[00:49] about that really quick. Like, Wolves

[00:51] and Finance looks like a guy to me who

[00:53] takes extreme pleasure in like

[00:56] challenging people. He's just not

[00:58] naturally as like super clever. Let's

[01:01] just get this out of the way. He's

[01:02] hilarious. Okay, I didn't mean anything

[01:04] by that. I was just trying to set the

[01:05] joke up that I was about to make. Now,

[01:07] also what you're going to learn in this

[01:08] video is he is having a tremendous

[01:10] impact right now at TPUSA. They are

[01:12] worried about this. They weren't before,

[01:15] but they are now. And I'm going to show

[01:16] you how I know. And I'm also going to

[01:18] show you the realization that they have

[01:20] inevitably had as a result of what

[01:23] you're going to see here and why Tyler

[01:25] Boyer is probably answering some very

[01:27] tough questions to the people who trust

[01:29] him to make good decisions. And then I'm

[01:32] also going to show you something that I

[01:34] actually spoke about which is the IRS

[01:36] letter that Wolves and Finance had said

[01:38] he thought was Trump and I said I don't

[01:40] think that that's who it is. Well, guess

[01:41] what? There is something huge, huge from

[01:46] that story that I completely missed and

[01:48] so did Wolves and Finance that I am

[01:50] going to change. I'm going to change the

[01:51] fact that we missed it in this video.

[01:53] That's going to be the last segment and

[01:54] believe me, you are going to want to see

[01:56] that because if you understand what I'm

[01:57] explaining, it's a really, really big

[02:01] deal. Okay, so we're going to jump right

[02:03] into it right this second. Now, if you

[02:05] watch my videos and you have not

[02:07] subscribed, I will just say I keep on

[02:10] saying it's not free to watch my

[02:11] content. It's one of those things that's

[02:13] on the honor system. I'm like the guy

[02:14] with the candy at the front of the

[02:15] store. Leave a quarter for

[02:17] musculardrophe and people just do it.

[02:19] That is subscribing to my channel and

[02:20] liking the video if you're going to

[02:21] watch my stuff. Now, all of my

[02:22] subscribers, I appreciate you guys, but

[02:24] if you don't mind remembering to like

[02:26] this video and everybody forward this

[02:28] video to everybody if you find yourself

[02:31] going, "Oh my god." Which you will,

[02:33] which you will. So, let's go. All right.

[02:35] So, let's rock and roll and we are going

[02:37] to take a look at this and I will tell

[02:38] you exactly what we are talking about

[02:40] here. I received a message from someone

[02:42] named Margaret. Like many other people,

[02:45] she donated money to Turning Point USA

[02:47] because she was moved by Charlie Kirk's

[02:49] death. She was told if she gave a

[02:52] donation that she would receive a hat as

[02:54] part of their fundraising effort. Here

[02:57] is the message. Thank you for your

[02:59] contribution to TurningPoint USA with

[03:01] the official Turning Point email

[03:02] address. And it says, "Shipping of your

[03:05] hat could take up to 10 to 12 weeks."

[03:07] She donated on September 16th. 12 weeks

[03:11] would have been the second week in

[03:12] December. Margaret has never received a

[03:15] hat. Instead, she received this card

[03:18] with a rubber bracelet. They are sending

[03:21] bracelets to people instead of the hat

[03:23] they promised. And this is not an

[03:26] isolated incident. Here is a Facebook

[03:28] post made a $25 donation to TPUSA back

[03:32] in September. Now, I am pretty sure that

[03:34] I covered this in my video yesterday,

[03:36] but in case I didn't, and I am just not

[03:38] remembering, bottom line is they were

[03:40] promised uh that if they donated at

[03:43] least $25, they would receive a hat uh

[03:45] with uh you know, the 47 on it. Okay?

[03:48] And I talked, I'm pretty sure also

[03:49] yesterday about how what this probably

[03:52] means, the fact that they're no longer

[03:53] shipping the hats, is that it was one of

[03:56] those deals where they bought all of the

[03:57] hats from one of their political friends

[04:00] so that they could have an excuse to

[04:01] kick them $200,000 out of uh TPUSA

[04:04] funds. They get to make a profit of

[04:06] whatever 150,000 or actually they could

[04:08] charge whatever they want for the hats,

[04:09] so it doesn't really matter. They can

[04:10] kind of, you know, oh, they're $30 hats

[04:12] and then we're giving them away for free

[04:13] and we're going to buy uh you know, I

[04:14] don't know, a million of them or

[04:15] whatever. I mean, I'm exaggerating, but

[04:17] this is like a perfect method where

[04:19] there are no laws being violated where

[04:21] you can kind of friends and family kick

[04:22] people a lot of money. Okay? And the

[04:24] fact that they stopped doing that almost

[04:26] certainly means that what happened is

[04:28] the friend of theirs who they bought the

[04:30] hats from stopped producing them because

[04:33] they're no longer campaigning to be the

[04:35] 47th president. So, like there's no more

[04:38] of those to do this deal on. So, TPUSA

[04:41] doesn't have anymore and they can't get

[04:42] anymore because the person they bought

[04:43] them from is no longer producing them.

[04:44] Okay, fine. whatever. Right? That is

[04:46] what I talked about yesterday. There is

[04:48] a very big development right this second

[04:50] though that I am going to show you here.

[04:52] Okay. So, check this out. This was sent

[04:54] to me. It was not sent to me. It was

[04:55] sent to me by someone else, but they

[04:56] forwarded to me and then I looked at

[04:58] this. But this is another TPUSA uh donor

[05:02] who sent this to a friend of mine and

[05:04] they and she was like, "Hey, look at

[05:05] this." So, I received this on uh

[05:08] September 20th and it says, "Delivery of

[05:10] your 47 hat could take up between 8 to

[05:13] 10 weeks." Okay. And then here, this is

[05:16] on uh December 29th. It says, "Pam, I

[05:19] wanted to thank you for your recent

[05:20] donation to Turning Point USA. I'm

[05:22] writing to provide you with an update on

[05:23] the status of your 47 hat you are

[05:25] expecting. Unfortunately, there has been

[05:27] a delay in the shipment of many of our

[05:29] products due to the sheer volume of

[05:30] support we've received across the

[05:32] country. We apologize for the delay."

[05:35] Okay. So, you're like, "All right. All

[05:37] right. That Okay, but this is the thing

[05:40] that really matters." Okay. This is this

[05:43] is what really matters. So she receives

[05:45] this letter January 20th, 2026. Very

[05:49] important. Okay. So it says right here

[05:52] in the highlighted area, it says, "This

[05:55] letter serves as an official receipt for

[05:58] your charitable donation to Turning

[06:00] Point USA received on 92025

[06:03] in the amount of $25. No goods or

[06:07] services were provided or received in

[06:09] exchange for this contribution." You're

[06:11] probably asking yourself why this is

[06:13] important in any way at all because we

[06:15] already knew about this, right? Except

[06:17] for, you know, the backdated letter that

[06:19] they received. Well, here's the thing.

[06:22] Why would they suddenly send this person

[06:25] a backdated letter to explain that in

[06:27] fact, even though we did tell you that

[06:30] you would get a hat in exchange for your

[06:33] donation, which I'm sure is legally

[06:34] binding in one way or another, you're in

[06:37] fact not going to receive the hat that

[06:40] we promised you. And as kind of small

[06:43] time as this seems, it's probably

[06:45] actually a potentially very large

[06:46] problem if they had hundreds of

[06:49] thousands or whatever number of people

[06:52] who actually donated money. Who knows

[06:54] how many who knows how many people

[06:55] donated after Charlie Kirk was

[06:57] assassinated. And the point is, if you

[06:59] make one mistake, like you promise

[07:01] someone a hat for a donation, you don't

[07:02] deliver it, that can be whatever. But if

[07:04] you promise hundreds of thousands of

[07:05] them, that could be a much bigger

[07:06] problem. The thing about it is is you

[07:09] don't really expect anyone to make a

[07:12] huge thing of it on their own, right?

[07:14] However, if someone points it out in a

[07:17] video that gets widely distributed,

[07:19] that's a very different thing. And the

[07:20] fact that she received it on January

[07:22] 20th tells us something very important

[07:24] about Wolves and Finance and how he is

[07:27] approaching this. Because what this

[07:28] means is it means he took them up on the

[07:31] challenge that they posed in the season

[07:34] desist letter. Okay, so take a look at

[07:36] this real quick and let's get to work.

[07:38] Okay, so here is the cease and desist

[07:41] and you can see, you know, here's all

[07:43] the things that you said. This is bad.

[07:45] You know, hey man, this was dad. Wasn't

[07:47] a it wasn't a doze style audit. It was a

[07:50] it was a good faith effort just to chase

[07:52] down how we're doing this, that, or the

[07:54] other, you know. Then it was this one.

[07:56] It's like, hey, you said uh that we had

[07:58] ghost employees or you said whatever.

[08:00] Okay, none of that's actually important

[08:01] to what we're talking about, but this

[08:04] part is. Okay, so this says, I am happy

[08:07] to provide you with further information

[08:09] confirming what I have set forth above.

[08:11] While the TP entities have actionable

[08:12] and uh meritorious defamation claims

[08:15] against you, the TP entities are not

[08:17] looking for litigation. Rather, their

[08:18] interest is in the truth and making sure

[08:20] the public's record is accurate. Please

[08:22] confirm that you will publicly correct

[08:24] your false statements immediately. So

[08:26] they are stating very clearly what they

[08:28] want is not to go to court, right? They

[08:31] don't want any litigation, man. They

[08:33] just want you to stop. That's the goal

[08:35] of them sending this letter. And they

[08:37] mean it in this case for sure because

[08:40] what they are telling you to stop

[08:41] talking about is all related to the

[08:43] finances. I don't care who you are. You

[08:45] do not want people, especially a

[08:47] forensic accountant of any kind to be

[08:49] digging through your your, you know,

[08:51] finances in a discovery process with a

[08:53] person like Wolves in Finance who they

[08:55] know for sure has a really serious

[08:59] background. And so the way that they

[09:00] close this out is they say,

[09:03] "Additionally, please contact me before

[09:05] you publish anything more about any of

[09:07] the TP entities and their finances. I

[09:10] can provide you with accurate

[09:11] information to answer any legitimate

[09:13] questions you may have. Otherwise, you

[09:14] will be acting recklessly and

[09:16] maliciously if you go ahead and publish

[09:18] further unsupported assertions about TP

[09:21] entities without giving me the

[09:23] opportunity to provide you with the

[09:25] truth in advance. Now, I don't know who

[09:27] Paul Edgar Herald is. I haven't looked

[09:29] into his background. Not relevant.

[09:31] However, I think I'm fair in assuming

[09:33] that Tyler Boyer is the one who's behind

[09:35] this. And what I would have told him if

[09:37] I were Paul Edgar Herald is I would have

[09:40] said this is a catastrophic mistake that

[09:42] you're about to make. Okay? Because what

[09:45] you're doing is you've now given you

[09:48] access to Wolves in Finance. Okay? We

[09:51] sent a threat. Well, right here you are

[09:53] literally telling him if you want to

[09:55] publish anything else, you need to give

[09:58] it to us first. And so to a dumbbell who

[10:01] has not played this thing out chess

[10:04] strategically,

[10:05] they think they're going to scare him or

[10:06] they're going to be able to protect

[10:08] themselves from him putting out false

[10:10] information. What about real

[10:12] information?

[10:13] What about things that are actually real

[10:16] that you would not want to comment on

[10:18] and give any credence to at all? Because

[10:21] the second you open yourself up like

[10:23] this, then now he has access to TPUSA

[10:25] and everyone knows it. So he is going to

[10:27] give you things that he finds and say,

[10:29] "What's your comment on this? Is this

[10:30] something that's real?" And now instead

[10:33] of being able to ignore things and

[10:34] having the public assume that they're

[10:36] not true, guess what? Now your

[10:39] fingerprints are on anything that he

[10:41] puts out and you're going to be

[10:42] basically validating that what he says

[10:44] is true. And so in the example, and the

[10:46] reason that we're talking about the hats

[10:48] is when you look at the date and they

[10:49] got it, January 20th. What does that

[10:51] tell you? That tells you that Wolves in

[10:53] Finance brought this exact thing about

[10:56] the hats to the attorney and said, "This

[10:58] is something that I found. Is this true

[11:00] that you guys have taken this long with

[11:02] the hats and that you're suddenly just

[11:04] now sending wristbands instead of the

[11:06] hats that were promised?" How much do

[11:08] these wristbands cost? I think I did a

[11:10] little bit of research here and these

[11:12] cost about uh six cents to make as

[11:14] opposed to I've done some kind of uh

[11:16] rudimentary research into the hats and

[11:19] the hats seem to cost I don't know uh

[11:21] $16 to get done. Is this something that

[11:24] you like to comment on? Why is TPUSA

[11:27] lying to people about what they're going

[11:28] to get when they donate when you have no

[11:32] intention of actually providing the

[11:33] thing that you're promising to them? Is

[11:34] that a is that a crime of some kind? Is

[11:36] there any statute against that kind of

[11:38] thing? And the attorney is going to take

[11:40] that and he's going to go to Tyler Boyer

[11:42] and he's going to go, "What what do you

[11:43] have to say about this?" Tyler Boyer is

[11:45] going to say the following. He's going

[11:46] to go, "Well, we can't get those hats

[11:47] anymore." You know, if he's really

[11:49] talking clean, he's going to be like, "I

[11:50] actually bought those from Don Jr. That

[11:52] was really more of a way for us to

[11:54] cleverly move some money in the

[11:56] direction of uh you know, the Trump

[11:58] family without having any kind of you

[12:01] know, legal exposure cuz there's nothing

[12:03] illegal about what he did." And as a

[12:04] matter of fact, allegedly that's that's

[12:06] what I would guess is how they

[12:08] structured that deal because I know they

[12:10] bought a million copy, not a million.

[12:12] They bought a bunch of copies of one of

[12:14] the Trump people's book. It might have

[12:16] been Don Junior's book and they were

[12:17] giving those out at events. Why?

[12:21] Well, we get to give conservative

[12:22] values, you know, to the people who come

[12:24] to the events. And then you also get to

[12:25] give a bunch of money to people that it

[12:27] is very convenient to give money to. And

[12:28] then they find ways to make you money.

[12:30] That's this entire game. It's exactly

[12:32] what I would do if I was in their

[12:33] situation. That's why it's so easy for

[12:34] me to back into every single thing that

[12:35] they're doing. But Tyler Boyer knows he

[12:39] can't get more of the hats. And so he

[12:40] has to tell his attorney, "Yeah,

[12:42] actually we can't get those anymore."

[12:44] And so the attorney's like, "Dude, this

[12:45] is a problem, man. You're exposed on

[12:47] this thing." And so Tyler Boyer goes,

[12:49] "Well, what are we going to do?" And

[12:50] it's like, "Well, he's going to put this

[12:53] out. I can't tell him not to put out

[12:54] something that's true. He's going to put

[12:56] it in his video." And so Tyler Boyer's

[12:58] like, "Well, what should we do?" He

[13:00] said, "You need to send out

[13:01] communication to anyone who was promised

[13:03] a hat that you are no longer going to be

[13:06] providing that hat." And maybe you could

[13:07] send like a backdated snail mail letter

[13:10] because that way people are much less

[13:12] likely to actually look at it because if

[13:14] they send it in email, people are way

[13:15] more likely to see it. The fact that it

[13:16] came snail mail means they probably were

[13:19] trying to cover their ass and have as

[13:20] few people actually see it as possible

[13:22] and they thought they might be able to

[13:23] get away with that without wolves in

[13:25] finance finding out about it. But now

[13:27] he's going to because someone reached

[13:29] out to Danks and told him about it.

[13:31] Danks had no idea how to interpret it.

[13:32] He's like, "This is kind of weird. You

[13:34] think they're broke?" And I was like,

[13:34] "Hey, you brought this to the right guy

[13:37] because this is what I do." Okay, I will

[13:40] back into everything that's going on.

[13:42] This is what actually happened. This

[13:43] means Wolves in Finance brought it to

[13:45] the attorney, told him this. The

[13:47] attorney took it to Tyler Boyer. He

[13:49] knows he can't get more hats. So they

[13:50] have to try to sneak this as best they

[13:53] can to try to, you know, kill any legal

[13:55] liability and they're going to do it in

[13:56] a way that is least likely for the

[13:59] people to actually see it. But they're

[14:00] now covered because they told them

[14:02] documented that they were not actually

[14:03] going to provide the hat. I don't know

[14:06] if that would hold up in court, you

[14:07] know, and basically all I'm doing here

[14:09] is just hypothesizing, by the way,

[14:11] allegedly, you know, just like maybe one

[14:14] of the most educated guesses I've ever

[14:16] made in my entire life that this is

[14:17] exactly what happened. But again, this

[14:19] is an example of how this cease and

[14:21] desist is going to bury them. Okay? This

[14:25] was a catastrophic mistake.

[14:26] Catastrophic. And if you're not

[14:28] understanding what I'm saying, I just

[14:29] want to fully like reiterate this.

[14:34] Wolves in Finance was a small YouTuber

[14:36] who did not have the type of reach that

[14:39] these guys are used to having to deal

[14:41] with. And when I say small YouTuber, I

[14:43] put myself in in that category by a

[14:45] mile. I am not a big big anything,

[14:47] right? TPUSA is a massive globally

[14:52] powerful organization. People still do

[14:54] not realize who they're dealing with

[14:55] when they're talking about them. I was I

[14:57] the next part of this video is going to

[15:00] be about who you're actually dealing

[15:01] with at TPUSA and how powerful they

[15:03] actually are. Okay, but since we haven't

[15:05] gotten there yet, I just want to

[15:06] reiterate the correct strategy in almost

[15:09] every case if you're TPUSA dealing with

[15:11] someone like Wolves in Finance or me or

[15:13] anybody who's like a little bit like

[15:15] smaller than Candace is to ignore it.

[15:17] It's to ignore it because it doesn't

[15:19] have any validity as long as they ignore

[15:21] it. The second that you sent this cease

[15:23] and desist, you can't ignore it if it's

[15:25] true because Wolves and Finance is going

[15:27] to bring it to your attorney and then

[15:29] you're going to be made aware of it and

[15:31] then you can't plead ignorance publicly,

[15:32] privately, or anywhere else. And the

[15:35] fact that they had to send these letters

[15:36] out means that anyone who advised

[15:39] against the cease and desist to Tyler

[15:41] Ber is right this second watching this

[15:43] video and being like we should hire that

[15:45] guy to run this organization because the

[15:47] numbum skull that we have doing it made

[15:49] the most predictable mistake of all

[15:51] time. And now who knows where this is

[15:55] going to lead because they're also

[15:56] looking at Wolves and Finance and

[15:57] they're looking at his background.

[15:58] They're going this is not some small

[16:01] YouTuber. Did you know who this guy was?

[16:04] Did you think that he was going to get

[16:05] scared by a seasoned desist? Have you

[16:07] not seen what this guy's been involved

[16:08] in before? We don't want to around

[16:11] with this guy, but they did. Now, listen

[16:12] to be clear. To be very clear, Wolves

[16:16] and Finance is a way smaller threat to

[16:20] TPUSA than any of those guys are to

[16:22] Wolves and Finance. I would not do what

[16:24] he's doing. Okay, to be clear, I would

[16:26] not do what I'm doing is I'm just

[16:29] basically like uh translating a language

[16:32] that I speak, which is human chess, in

[16:36] the corporate and legal environment, to

[16:38] people who I know don't understand what

[16:40] they're actually looking at at the level

[16:42] that I do. That's all I'm doing. I am

[16:44] not trying to attack TPUSA. I am

[16:48] definitely not trying to make enemies

[16:49] with anyone at TPUSA. And I can tell

[16:51] them directly if they're watching this.

[16:53] I have had things come in that I have

[16:55] very intentionally not put out. And

[16:57] that's definitely not a threat. I'm

[16:58] never putting them out because I don't

[17:00] want a problem with them at all. I do

[17:02] not want a problem with people who can

[17:04] cell phone. Okay. The chairman of the

[17:08] Treasury. People do. You don't

[17:10] understand how powerful they are. But

[17:13] Wolson Finance is probably a guy who's

[17:15] got his entire life buttoned up and he's

[17:16] like, "Go ahead, throw a problem at me.

[17:19] I'm not wired like that. I like to make

[17:21] people laugh and I like to live a nice

[17:23] fun life and I will totally acknowledge

[17:25] that every single thing that I have seen

[17:27] from DB USA in terms of sweetheart deals

[17:29] with their buddies. I say this every

[17:30] time. I would do the same thing. Now I

[17:34] would not have sent this season desist

[17:35] out though. I would have seen this

[17:36] coming for sure. Absolutely. For sure.

[17:39] You know I am available for uh you know

[17:42] strategic advice just for fun. You know,

[17:45] if I told you some of the uh contracts

[17:47] I've helped negotiate, you wouldn't

[17:49] believe me, but it's true.

[17:52] Especially when you have to play in the

[17:54] press and you have to think through what

[17:56] is going to happen if you do X or if you

[17:58] do Y, you know. But, uh, now let's move

[18:02] over to the other part of this video.

[18:04] So, I put the two segments of this video

[18:07] in the order that I did on purpose

[18:09] because I wanted what I just said to be

[18:11] the leadin to this section. Okay. Now,

[18:14] Wolves and Finance yesterday said that

[18:16] he thought that Donald Trump's uh

[18:18] handwriting was on the letter that was

[18:22] exonerating or uh not exonerating,

[18:25] that's the wrong word. Uh I don't know,

[18:26] stating to the public that TPUSA is

[18:28] actually not under any kind of

[18:30] investigation. And he said that he

[18:31] thought that the red line that says

[18:34] Erica instead of Mrs. Kirk appears to be

[18:36] Trump's handwriting. I disagreed with

[18:37] that yesterday, but that's also not

[18:40] important because I missed a massive

[18:42] massive thing that I am now going to

[18:45] shed some light on because to me saying

[18:47] you think it's the president of the

[18:48] United States who made that red line is

[18:50] actually a much bigger accusation than

[18:52] anything that I am going to uh say here.

[18:55] However, what I'm going to say here

[18:57] requires way less speculation than this.

[19:01] Okay? Because this is just a question

[19:02] that no one's going to be able to answer

[19:04] when I pose it. So, let's go ahead and

[19:05] take a look at that. and uh we'll

[19:08] understand why Jesse does not want a

[19:10] problem with these guys.

[19:10] >> Uh the letter from the IRS to Erica Kirk

[19:14] and TPUSA that talks about what their

[19:17] situation is as regards to the IRS. This

[19:20] letter has been floating around and

[19:22] reported on by mainstream news outlets

[19:24] like CBS. Except the letter itself has

[19:27] never been shown until Paramount

[19:29] Tactical's podcast. In fact, I'm

[19:32] guessing he was not supposed to show

[19:34] this to his audience because it is quite

[19:37] shocking. It is a two-page letter on

[19:39] Department of the Treasury letterhead.

[19:41] It says it is responding to a request

[19:43] from Erica Kirk. It says, "One, there is

[19:47] no IRS investigation currently underway

[19:49] on Turning Point. Two, all four 990

[19:52] forms were filed by May 15th, 2025.

[19:56] Three, the next year's forms will be

[19:58] filed by May 15, 2026. The letter is

[20:01] signed by Treasury Secretary Scott

[20:03] Bassant. Paramount Tactical is

[20:05] presenting this letter as some kind of

[20:06] evidence that there is no fraud at

[20:09] Turning Point. That is ridiculous for a

[20:12] number of reasons. We all know this

[20:15] because all of us deal with the IRS. We

[20:18] all know this is not normal behavior.

[20:21] Have any of you ever received a letter

[20:24] from the IRS saying just letting you

[20:27] know we're not doing an investigation on

[20:29] you?

[20:31] >> No.

[20:31] >> I just want to reiterate again. He is

[20:33] clever. He absolutely is clever. Let's

[20:36] continue. Sorry.

[20:37] >> Of course you have not because the IRS

[20:39] does not do this and it's not coming

[20:42] from the IRS. The letter is signed by

[20:44] the Treasury Secretary Scott Basant. To

[20:48] me, this looks more like a political

[20:50] favor to Donald Trump's personal friends

[20:52] than a legitimate IRS communication.

[20:55] Second, the wording in this letter does

[20:58] not mean anything.

[21:00] Just because the IRS is not

[21:01] investigating does not mean there is no

[21:04] fraud going on. This does not mean that

[21:07] donors cannot sue Turning Point to get

[21:09] their money back. This does not mean

[21:11] that state attorney generals cannot file

[21:14] criminal charges against Turning Point

[21:16] executives.

[21:18] This letter does not disprove my

[21:20] concerns about their finances. And what

[21:23] is this?

[21:25] What is this? At the top of the page,

[21:28] someone has crossed out Mrs. Kirk and

[21:31] wrote in Erica.

[21:33] It looks like someone is proofreading

[21:35] Scott Basent's letter. Boom. Now,

[21:39] correct assumption

[21:42] in one of his two assumptions because if

[21:44] you guys remember, you know where that's

[21:45] going, right? He's going to say that he

[21:48] believes that it is Donald Trump's

[21:50] handwriting. Okay. Now, the point he's

[21:54] trying to make is he's trying to make

[21:56] the point that the Trump administration

[21:58] is doing a political favor for people at

[22:02] TPUSA. Okay? I have no insight as to

[22:06] whether or not that is accurate. What I

[22:08] can point out to you is that this is

[22:12] much less likely to be someone on the

[22:15] other side of this who redlined take out

[22:18] Mrs. Kirk and write Erica, right? Why

[22:22] would someone on the other side of this

[22:25] at the IRS or the Department of the

[22:26] Treasury or whatever, why would they be

[22:29] redlining this document? And how would

[22:32] Paramount Tactical get the copy of this

[22:35] document that has a red line on it?

[22:37] Let's say that you're negotiating a

[22:39] contract between your your company.

[22:41] Let's just say it's me and some I don't

[22:43] know, somebody who wants to represent me

[22:44] to brands, right? And it's like, hey, do

[22:46] you want to have this annual deal with

[22:48] this company over here and here are the

[22:50] deal terms? And they send me over the

[22:51] contract. And then a smart person would

[22:54] then send it to their attorney. I do

[22:57] this myself without a law degree.

[22:59] probably not that smart, but I feel

[23:00] pretty confident in my ability to do

[23:02] this nonetheless. I read through it and

[23:04] I take language that I think should be

[23:07] changed in order to protect me better

[23:09] and I redline it. Okay, normally you

[23:11] would be doing this on a computer or

[23:12] whatever, but I would like cross out a

[23:14] line and I would say like if it would

[23:16] said this this deal will have

[23:18] exclusivity for 365 days after your

[23:22] contract is over. And I would go I would

[23:24] redline that and I would say this this

[23:27] deal has exclusivity for 30 days after

[23:29] this contract because that protects them

[23:31] against me immediately leaving their

[23:33] deal and then going and promoting a

[23:35] competitor. They want a year, I want 30

[23:38] days. So, I would send that version back

[23:40] over to them and then they would make a

[23:42] a determination if that's acceptable. In

[23:44] that case, they would probably say 90

[23:46] days and I would say, "Okay, fine." And

[23:48] then we would sign it. So, a red line

[23:51] like this that is telling this person

[23:53] that they want this change to Erica,

[23:56] okay, why would someone on the IRS side

[23:58] have any opinion whatsoever on what the

[24:02] name is that this is written to? Why

[24:04] would they care? Why would the IRS care?

[24:06] Why would why would Donald Trump be

[24:08] redlining this document? Makes no sense.

[24:11] Okay? Because what that means is that

[24:13] the red lines would in this in my

[24:16] example, I have no idea if I'm right

[24:18] about this, okay? But in my example, the

[24:21] people redlining would be TPUSA, right?

[24:25] And they're like, well, let's have it

[24:26] say Erica instead of Mrs. Kirk. And then

[24:29] they would send that back and then they

[24:31] would do it because guess what? Again,

[24:34] why would Paramount Tactical have a copy

[24:36] of a redlinined version that says Erica?

[24:39] They would have had to have he would

[24:40] have had to have gotten that from the

[24:43] IRS or the Trump administration or

[24:44] whatever. And we already know that he is

[24:47] getting he's receiving things from

[24:49] TPUSA. I believe Andrew Kovit, a really

[24:52] nice gentleman, looks like a

[24:53] good-looking guy who I would probably

[24:54] get along with very very well, who I

[24:56] definitely do not want a problem with.

[24:57] But if we're assuming that he is a, you

[25:00] know, consistent source for Paramount

[25:02] Tactical, then that would mean that he

[25:04] is the one who sent this to him. If I'm

[25:06] hypothesizing

[25:09] correctly, which means that he would

[25:12] have been the one who has the redline

[25:13] copy, which means who

[25:16] who is approving

[25:19] the writing or the the language in this

[25:21] letter? Who is approving it? Who

[25:23] redlined it? Because if TPUSA is

[25:27] redlining an official document from the

[25:30] Department of the Treasury that is

[25:31] signed by the uh chairman,

[25:35] okay, you starting to understand who

[25:37] you're dealing with. Do you know anyone

[25:40] who could make a phone call and get a

[25:42] document like this? Of course not. These

[25:45] guys are incredibly powerful. which is

[25:49] why I always whenever I talk about this

[25:52] stuff make very clear I got no issues

[25:55] with these guys I am just talking that's

[25:57] what I do and I am incapable of seeing a

[26:01] thing like this which does not appear to

[26:03] be illegal it and and not saying it

[26:06] because it makes me feel smart that I

[26:09] can pick out what's going on and then I

[26:11] also assume that people probably find it

[26:13] pretty interesting but to be clear me

[26:15] shutting up is as simple as beep boop

[26:18] Boop boop boop boop. Hello, Jesse

[26:20] Empire. Uh, you're a little too good at

[26:22] what you're doing and we would

[26:23] appreciate it if you would just stop

[26:25] talking about our money. Stop talking

[26:26] about any uh favors that we're getting

[26:28] this that or the other. And I will,

[26:31] okay, we don't need to get legal and you

[26:33] certainly don't need to attack me any

[26:35] other way because I and I don't mean

[26:36] like violence or anything. I just mean

[26:37] like I don't you know I don't want to

[26:39] put any ideas in anyone's head of like

[26:40] nasty things they could do that I would

[26:42] not want. But like I'm a phone call

[26:45] away, dude. you know, take me golfing

[26:47] and I'll be your best friend. And that

[26:48] goes for everybody. Every person on

[26:50] earth most likely, except for Gavin

[26:52] Newsome, except for Gavin Newsome. I

[26:54] don't care. I'll go golfing with you.

[26:56] I'll be like, "Wow, he's charming." And

[26:58] afterwards, I'll be like, "But Patrick

[27:00] Baitman, dude, real life version."

[27:02] Nonetheless, okay, nonetheless, they are

[27:05] extremely powerful. And when I recogniz

[27:07] when I figured that out, you know, that

[27:08] this is probably what was going on,

[27:10] certainly no certainty. I was like,

[27:12] "Wow, wolves missed that. He missed it.

[27:16] He put it on Trump because he's asking a

[27:18] question. You can't tell. But the point

[27:20] he's making is is probably correct that

[27:23] it is exactly what it looks like a

[27:24] political favor.

[27:27] But it's not it's probably not Trump's

[27:28] actual handwriting, but what it actually

[27:31] is is a much bigger deal. If TBUSA is

[27:35] redlining their own documents from the

[27:37] IRS or the Treasury, like that's a

[27:38] really big deal, dude.

[27:40] And again, maybe the reason why I keep

[27:42] saying like they're just doing what I

[27:43] would do is none of this surprises me at

[27:46] all. This is the way the world works. Do

[27:49] you really think that because people

[27:50] have big highowered jobs that their

[27:51] relationships are different than yours?

[27:53] you know, like if you've got like if

[27:55] you're in the uh if you're in the I

[27:57] don't know, if you paint houses or

[27:58] something or you've got like a small um

[28:01] I don't know, you got a a company that

[28:02] does uh renovations and you've got a

[28:05] buddy that in the same business that

[28:06] you've been buddies with for 15 years

[28:08] and he kicks you jobs, you kick him jobs

[28:11] and there's a way that you guys can, you

[28:12] know, make a phone call, he could take

[28:14] this job, you guys can kind of split

[28:15] some extra money, whatever, and you guys

[28:17] do like that's what you do. You would do

[28:19] it because you trust them and they're

[28:20] your friends and you like doing your

[28:22] friends favors. Okay. Well, apply the

[28:24] exact same thing except with people who

[28:27] have the world at their fingertips.

[28:29] Okay? That's all this is. That is all

[28:31] this is. Nothing that I'm seeing in any

[28:34] of this is evil. It is just human nature

[28:36] playing out in real time. And I

[28:38] understand people. Now, when we get to

[28:39] the other stuff, when you talk about,

[28:41] you know, you know what? Not even

[28:43] talking about that. I will just say

[28:45] there's a lot I don't talk about that is

[28:48] not, you know, not this or or them

[28:52] that could be talked about sprouting

[28:54] from the same inciting incident. And I

[28:57] just

[28:59] because I have a feeling TPUSA is not

[29:00] going to have me killed and I certainly

[29:03] don't want to be on the list of anybody

[29:04] who I might be referencing right now. So

[29:07] I just

[29:10] but uh

[29:13] yeah so it's gonna be fun to watch this

[29:15] because Candace Owens immovable object

[29:18] you know wolves in finance definitely a

[29:20] movable object and I am just some

[29:23] dumbass who likes making jokes

[29:24] and uh has a fair amount of experience

[29:26] in this stuff. So I will you know as

[29:29] long as they haven't asked me to stop

[29:31] keep on translating this stuff for

[29:32] people who think it's funny. So that's

[29:34] what I got. I love you guys. Subscribe

[29:36] to the channel. Ring the bell.