[00:00] So, I am changing my tone, cuz I just
[00:02] did a very serious video about the
[00:04] Minnesota thing and I want to talk about
[00:07] this TPUSA
[00:09] uh Wolves and Finance cease and desist.
[00:12] The next chapter's hit and listen, man.
[00:14] I am ready to spectate this thing and
[00:18] talk about it and make jokes, because
[00:20] this is a lesson apparently people need
[00:23] to all learn. That is that if you want
[00:27] to challenge people with legal letters,
[00:29] what you should definitely do is make
[00:31] sure that the threat is real, cuz if
[00:35] it's not, guess what's going to happen,
[00:37] okay? The only reason you'd be sending
[00:39] out cease and desist orders to people is
[00:41] if the thing that they are saying is
[00:42] damaging you, right? I mean, that's like
[00:44] but now, something damaging you does not
[00:47] mean
[00:48] that it's not true, okay? You can't sue
[00:49] people for telling the truth about you.
[00:51] And you also can't sue people for asking
[00:54] questions about things that you're
[00:55] doing. And so, if you decide to send a
[00:57] cease and desist, you are literally
[00:59] Streisand- Strei- Strei- what?
[01:01] Streisand- Streisand effecting it.
[01:03] Where now you're pointing a a microscope
[01:06] directly in your microscope, wrong You
[01:09] guys understand. Like putting a light at
[01:10] you.
[01:11] And if they keep on doing it and you do
[01:14] not sue them, what have you communicated
[01:16] to everyone? Empty threat and you were
[01:18] scared. And Wolves and Finance is
[01:20] literally taking his finger and sticking
[01:22] it right in between the eyes of Tyler
[01:24] Boyer right now, okay? He's like, "Hey
[01:26] Tyler. Hey Tyler. Go ahead, sue me,
[01:28] dude. Hey, you said you want to sue me,
[01:30] right?
[01:31] Hey, do you like my finger in your
[01:32] eyeball? Here, I'm going to put it right
[01:34] in your eye, okay?
[01:35] He is daring him. And if you think that
[01:38] I am exaggerating that, let's just watch
[01:39] this clip real quick just as a as a
[01:41] quick intro into some of the things
[01:44] we're going to be looking at right now.
[01:45] >> So, let me tell you what I think is
[01:47] going on. Tyler Boyer manages these
[01:49] political companies.
[01:50] The Trump election is coming up in 2024.
[01:54] Tyler Boyer realizes he needs more
[01:56] people to do ballot harvesting.
[01:59] So, he decides
[02:01] let's just steal the donations from
[02:03] Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.
[02:06] So, he transfers $8.6 million into the
[02:09] company he manages, America's Turning
[02:12] Point.
[02:13] And then he hires a bunch of people for
[02:15] illegal political activity.
[02:18] And he tells everyone
[02:20] come on, no one will ever know. Charlie
[02:23] Kirk doesn't even have to know.
[02:25] We will just say it is non-partisan.
[02:28] We will call it get-out-the-vote
[02:30] efforts. No one's ever going to ask
[02:32] questions. No one will ever look at the
[02:34] photographs. Don't worry about it.
[02:37] Except I think that Charlie Kirk found
[02:39] out.
[02:41] This fits the timeline of the Baker
[02:43] Tilly audit that concluded on June 20th,
[02:45] 2025 that would have revealed all this
[02:48] information to Charlie Kirk shortly
[02:50] before his murder.
[02:54] Oh, man, I'd only watched that once and
[02:57] I was watching it the first time just
[02:58] like, my goodness gracious. But I
[03:01] watched all of the build-up to that. And
[03:04] it was like he sounds like he is just
[03:07] overtly saying, "I have your cease and
[03:11] desist right here and this is me uh
[03:13] urinating on it." Like the like Wolves
[03:15] and Finance looks like a guy to me who
[03:18] takes extreme pleasure in like
[03:20] challenging people. He's just not
[03:22] naturally as like super clever. So, he
[03:26] looks to me like a person who would
[03:27] actually like take the cease and desist
[03:30] and and all stone-faced record himself.
[03:32] He's all, "This is me peeing on your
[03:35] cease and desist.
[03:37] It's getting yellow.
[03:39] Your cease and desist is getting yellow.
[03:41] Would you like to come get your cease
[03:43] and desist? I think you wouldn't. So,
[03:46] I'm going to take this cease and desist
[03:48] and I am going to use it to wipe my
[03:50] bottom.
[03:51] That's what I'm doing with your cease
[03:53] and desist, Tyler Boyer. And anyone who
[03:56] believes that his cease and desist was
[03:58] based on anything that has merit, you
[04:01] can come get the cease and desist and
[04:03] you can use it to stir your drink
[04:05] afterwards. Now, I would like to think
[04:07] that if Tyler Boyer saw this video, he
[04:09] would enjoy those jokes and that
[04:11] impression so much that even he would
[04:13] say, "You should definitely subscribe to
[04:15] Jesse on Fire's channel and you should
[04:18] definitely like this video." Or in the
[04:19] words of Wolves and Finance I just found
[04:23] out
[04:24] that you are not subscribed to Jesse on
[04:26] Fire's channel.
[04:28] This is unacceptable.
[04:30] If you don't subscribe, I will come to
[04:32] your house and I will audit your
[04:34] children.
[04:35] So, again
[04:37] if Tyler Boyer is the one who sent the
[04:39] cease and desist, which I think he is
[04:41] based on the fact that that's what I
[04:43] said from the beginning, cuz his name is
[04:45] all over it, right? It's It's him that's
[04:48] getting mentioned all throughout the
[04:49] thing.
[04:50] Well, I think he's made a drastic
[04:52] miscalculation of his opponent
[04:54] and now he just found that out, because
[04:57] that was just 1 minute of this video
[05:02] where Wolves and Finance is cooking him
[05:04] alive. And let me tell you something
[05:06] else, okay? He is not holding back. He's
[05:09] going after everyone. Now, clearly his
[05:13] attorney has advised him that what he's
[05:14] doing is completely above board and he
[05:16] is legally safe from any kind of
[05:19] repercussions, because he's the kind of
[05:21] person that would button that up in
[05:22] advance and there's no way that he would
[05:24] put this out if he thought that he
[05:25] wasn't.
[05:26] But I think that he might be looking at
[05:29] this differently if I were advising him
[05:32] and I would have additional concerns for
[05:35] him to consider before he went all the
[05:38] way ham on this
[05:39] because it it's it's about choosing your
[05:42] enemies selectively, right? There are
[05:45] certain battles you don't want, okay?
[05:47] You don't want them, I promise. And I
[05:49] think that he may have uh
[05:51] gone after someone that could end up
[05:54] costing him and I will show you exactly
[05:55] what I mean right here, okay?
[05:57] So, let me just show you this section
[06:00] and you guys tell me. Listen, I'm not
[06:01] I'm not condoning anything that's in
[06:03] this at all. I'm purely talking about if
[06:06] Wolves and Finance was my boy and I was
[06:09] giving him strategic advice
[06:11] I would have given him the following
[06:12] advice that I will tell you after we
[06:14] look at this.
[06:14] >> reported on by mainstream news outlets
[06:16] like CBS. Except the letter itself has
[06:20] never been shown until Paramount
[06:21] Tactical's podcast.
[06:23] In fact, I'm guessing he was not
[06:26] supposed to show this to his audience,
[06:28] because it is quite shocking.
[06:30] It is a two-page letter on Department of
[06:32] the Treasury letterhead. It says it is
[06:34] responding to a request from Erica Kirk.
[06:37] It says, one, there is no IRS
[06:40] investigation currently underway on
[06:42] Turning Point. Two, all 4990 forms were
[06:45] filed by May 15th, 2025.
[06:48] Three, the next year's forms will be
[06:50] filed by May 15th, 2026.
[06:53] The letter is signed by Treasury
[06:54] Secretary Scott Bissant.
[06:56] Paramount Tactical
[06:57] >> Real quick.
[06:59] Real quick.
[07:00] Let me show you guys something. Look at
[07:02] that signature. That is a great
[07:06] signature. I am a connoisseur of good
[07:10] signatures. I consider mine excellent.
[07:13] Matter of fact, I might sign something
[07:15] while the next segment is playing, since
[07:17] now we're talking signatures. And that
[07:18] is a fantastic one.
[07:21] Incredibly impressive signature.
[07:24] Um also, who is that guy again? Scott
[07:26] Bissant uh and that is the acting
[07:28] commissioner for the IRS, okay. Just
[07:30] noted.
[07:32] Okay, noted. He signed that. Now, let's
[07:34] continue.
[07:35] signed by Treasury Secretary Scott
[07:38] Bissant.
[07:39] Paramount Tactical is presenting this
[07:40] letter as some kind of evidence that
[07:42] there is no fraud at Turning Point.
[07:45] That is ridiculous for a number of
[07:47] reasons.
[07:49] We all know this, because all of us deal
[07:51] with the IRS. We all know this is not
[07:54] normal behavior.
[07:56] Have any of you ever received a letter
[07:59] from the IRS saying
[08:01] just letting you know, we're not doing
[08:03] an investigation on you?
[08:05] No, of course you have not, because the
[08:08] No.
[08:09] I definitely have not. Neither have you
[08:12] guys. Neither has Wolves and Finance and
[08:14] he's going to explain exactly why and
[08:15] then we're going to get to some
[08:17] important notes that I would have given
[08:19] him had I been advising. The IRS does
[08:21] not do this.
[08:23] And it's not coming from the IRS. The
[08:25] letter is signed by the Treasury
[08:27] Secretary Scott Bissant.
[08:30] To me, this looks more like a political
[08:32] favor to Donald Trump's personal friends
[08:34] than a legitimate IRS communication.
[08:37] >> Okay, but you can see right here that it
[08:39] says Scott Bissant, acting commissioner
[08:41] of the IRS. So, that is at least
[08:43] something
[08:44] that we need to point out before we move
[08:47] on and we continue this video and get to
[08:50] the part where I say, "Listen, dude.
[08:53] If I were advising you I would say you
[08:55] were maybe making enemies that you don't
[08:57] want and Tyler Boyer is not
[09:01] one of those people. But that is not who
[09:03] you're targeting, okay? So, if what
[09:05] you're saying, you know, if you don't
[09:07] want to get sued, that's because you're
[09:08] concerned about finances, right? You're
[09:10] concerned about your finances and you
[09:12] don't want to have your life destroyed.
[09:13] The he talks about that earlier in the
[09:14] video.
[09:16] Okay, well, being wrong in a civil
[09:18] lawsuit, that's not the only way you can
[09:19] get your life destroyed, okay? And
[09:21] again, I'm not condoning anything that I
[09:23] am talking about. I am just purely
[09:25] getting ready to talk about the way the
[09:27] world actually works, okay? Now, let's
[09:29] continue this
[09:30] and then I will make the point that I'm
[09:32] actually making. back. This does not
[09:34] mean that state attorney generals cannot
[09:36] file criminal charges against Turning
[09:39] Point executives.
[09:41] This letter does not disprove my
[09:43] concerns about their finances.
[09:46] And what is this?
[09:48] What is this?
[09:50] At the top of the page, someone has
[09:52] crossed out Mrs. Kirk and wrote in
[09:54] Erica.
[09:56] It looks like someone is proofreading
[09:58] Scott Presant's letter.
[10:01] Who could that be?
[10:03] I have reviewed so many White House
[10:05] documents and in my opinion, that
[10:07] handwriting looks like it was written by
[10:10] Donald Trump.
[10:12] If you compare it to other samples of
[10:14] his writing, he does a consistent method
[10:16] where he writes a name {dash} name
[10:18] {dash} name {dash}.
[10:21] Now, I do have to point out though that
[10:24] the actual handwriting here
[10:28] does not resemble the handwriting on
[10:31] that letter at all, right?
[10:33] The name {dash} yes, he does do that.
[10:37] But
[10:38] that is not the handwriting at all that
[10:41] that like he writes in
[10:43] in all caps.
[10:45] Trump writes in all caps. Now, I noticed
[10:48] that because I do that.
[10:50] I do that also.
[10:51] And uh anyway, so when you go back to
[10:54] the letter, just look and see if you
[10:56] guys agree with me that it actually
[10:57] probably is not Trump. That doesn't
[10:59] matter though for the point that I'm
[11:00] making, but just watch. Shh.
[11:02] The K is very much like this K. The E is
[11:05] written the same way as this W.
[11:08] This handwriting looks like it belong
[11:11] That's that's like half cursive
[11:14] and Trump is a person who writes in all
[11:17] caps. And again, I recognize this
[11:18] because I do the exact same thing and I
[11:21] do it because it enables me to make my
[11:22] handwriting cooler. And as a person who
[11:25] loves to do the signatures, you know,
[11:27] like I like to do that. This has nothing
[11:28] to do This is the only part of his video
[11:30] that I would push back on, but it still
[11:33] is not you know, necessarily related to
[11:35] the point I'm going to make in a second.
[11:36] >> ongs to Donald Trump.
[11:40] This letter does not look like it came
[11:42] from the IRS. It looks like it came from
[11:45] the President of the United States. Do
[11:48] you understand what this means?
[11:51] It means that he got advice from a
[11:54] lawyer that says that as as you say
[11:56] things like it looks like and what this
[12:00] would mean and things like that, you can
[12:01] say whatever you want. And what it means
[12:03] is that Tyler Boyer's cease and desist
[12:06] turned into a green light for them to
[12:09] absolutely hammer him as much as they
[12:11] want. Now, going to now actually make
[12:14] the point that I want to make, okay?
[12:17] Is the following.
[12:20] You do not want an enemy that is the
[12:26] commissioner of the IRS and you
[12:28] definitely do not want an enemy that is
[12:31] the you know, Secretary of the Treasury
[12:34] and you really don't want an enemy that
[12:37] is the President of the United States
[12:38] with a propensity for targeting enemies
[12:41] and trying to destroy them.
[12:43] Okay? Like that's what I'm saying. I'm
[12:45] not like I'm not saying that this is
[12:46] like a good thing for you know, like
[12:48] it's a good thing, bad thing, whatever.
[12:50] This is like I am completely agnostic to
[12:53] whether those personality traits or the
[12:55] way that this all works is a good good
[12:57] thing, bad thing, whatever. I am
[12:59] literally just saying this is what I
[13:01] would tell Wolves and Finance. It's like
[13:03] these guys, if they get it on for you,
[13:05] can destroy your life regardless of
[13:07] whether you're right. As a matter of
[13:08] fact, it actually matters zero if you're
[13:10] right. Now, I want to get into what he
[13:12] is actually accusing them of at least
[13:15] with using words like allegedly. But
[13:18] first, I want to just show you. I
[13:19] literally wrote this in my lap.
[13:22] Okay? So I you know, like look.
[13:24] This is not my This is not my best work.
[13:26] But since I was talking about writing in
[13:27] all caps, there it is. That is how I
[13:29] write. And there is not a world where I
[13:33] would write, you know, like like with
[13:35] half cur You know what I mean? Like it's
[13:36] like dude, if you write like this, this
[13:37] is how you write.
[13:39] My signature sucks on that, dude. I did
[13:41] it on my lap and I said my signature was
[13:43] boss and it's not even that good on this
[13:45] one, dude.
[13:47] I did it on a crumpled up old financial
[13:49] like a a mortgage statement. It like it
[13:52] looks like it fell in some water.
[13:56] Man.
[13:58] I should have done it better. I want to
[14:00] cut I'm just kidding.
[14:01] I mean no, I'm not kidding actually, but
[14:03] I don't actually care.
[14:05] Nonetheless, let's get over to where he
[14:07] outlines why
[14:09] this would be
[14:11] what Tyler Boyer is doing would be
[14:14] illegality, okay? So I want to just skip
[14:16] over a bunch of this cuz there's a lot.
[14:17] This is a very long video. It's 46
[14:19] minutes his video is. So like you
[14:20] obviously should definitely 100% watch
[14:23] it. But let me skip forward a little bit
[14:25] and let's uh
[14:27] let's go ahead. Oh, this is just this is
[14:29] so petty, dude. This is so petty. He
[14:31] does a section He does a section where
[14:33] he's talking about how the the Turning
[14:35] Point donors
[14:37] are not getting what they had agreed to
[14:40] that all of these small donors were
[14:41] complaining that they said that they
[14:43] would get a hat in return for their
[14:46] donation. And I actually want to make a
[14:47] very specific point about this. So I
[14:49] want to
[14:50] I'm actually just going to play a little
[14:51] bit of this because there actually is a
[14:53] very important point related to the hats
[14:55] that I want to make. All right, here we
[14:56] go.
[14:58] Most people don't know what has been
[15:00] happening with the donations.
[15:02] I received a message from someone named
[15:04] Margaret. Like many other people, she
[15:07] donated money to Turning Point USA
[15:09] because she was moved by Charlie Kirk's
[15:11] death.
[15:12] She was told if she gave a donation that
[15:15] she would receive a hat as part of their
[15:17] fundraising effort.
[15:18] Here is the message. Thank you for your
[15:20] contribution to Turning Point USA with
[15:23] the official Turning Point email
[15:24] address. And it says, "Shipping of your
[15:27] hat could take up to 10 to 12 weeks."
[15:29] She donated on September 16th. 12 weeks
[15:33] would have been the second week in
[15:33] December.
[15:35] Margaret has never received a hat.
[15:38] Instead, she received this card with a
[15:41] rubber bracelet.
[15:42] They are sending bracelets to people
[15:45] instead of the hat they promised. And
[15:47] this is not an isolated incident.
[15:49] Here is a Facebook post. "Made a $25
[15:52] donation to TPUSA back in September that
[15:54] was supposed to come with a $47 hat free
[15:57] for making the donation. Never got hat.
[16:00] Tried texting them and calling them
[16:02] several times and have not gotten
[16:04] response. Did get one response from
[16:06] someone named Anika who said she had no
[16:08] record of the transaction. Have sent
[16:10] them copies of my receipt with no
[16:12] response. Called and left my name and
[16:15] contact info on their voicemail because
[16:17] they never answer the phone and they
[16:18] don't even call you back.
[16:20] Loved Charlie Kirk and watched him
[16:22] religiously, but this has totally
[16:24] disappointed me. Will call my bank and
[16:26] see if I can get reimbursed for the
[16:28] donation." Okay, so let me show you guys
[16:30] something real quick, okay? So Bo, by
[16:32] the way,
[16:33] before I even before I even change this,
[16:36] this movie, okay?
[16:39] This movie which is called Violation,
[16:43] okay?
[16:44] I
[16:45] am not going to say anything about this
[16:47] movie except I
[16:50] challenge you to watch this full movie.
[16:53] And then tell And then hit me up an
[16:55] email and title it Violation and then
[16:57] tell me exactly what your experience
[16:59] watching this movie was. This is one of
[17:02] the most like
[17:05] impactful Not impactful. I don't even
[17:07] know how to even describe it. Like I've
[17:08] never had a movie that I could think of
[17:11] where I had a more visceral reaction to
[17:13] a film ever. Where I was like I I
[17:19] I I don't know how else to describe it.
[17:20] It's called Violation. It's on Amazon
[17:23] Amazon Prime, okay?
[17:26] Now,
[17:27] the point I wanted to make though is the
[17:28] following, okay? So right here.
[17:31] In 2020, Turning Point USA paid a
[17:34] company owned by Donald Trump Jr.
[17:36] $333,000 to purchase copies of one of
[17:38] his books. These were used by TPUSA as
[17:41] part of fundraising drive. Separately in
[17:43] 2019, the RNC spent nearly 100,000 on
[17:46] bulk of copies of the book. Okay, so
[17:49] why is that relevant? Simple, okay?
[17:52] Simple. It's because this is the nature
[17:56] of the game that they're playing. And
[17:58] when they get promised a $47 hat, okay?
[18:02] What that almost certainly means
[18:05] is that they did a very similar deal
[18:07] with someone else who is in that circle
[18:09] and they probably bought $150,000 worth
[18:12] of hats, you know? And then they give
[18:14] them out for free, but they ran out,
[18:16] right? Probably ran out of the hats. And
[18:18] then they go to you know, whoever this
[18:21] person is and they're probably done with
[18:22] that business now because that was kind
[18:25] of a you know, a campaign thing and they
[18:27] sold out of the hats. And so now they're
[18:28] like, "Oh, we're out of them. What are
[18:29] we going to do?" They're like, "I don't
[18:30] know. Just get like get those
[18:32] bracelets." Those little like those
[18:33] little bracelets cost nothing, right?
[18:35] And so they're you know, they're just
[18:37] trying to get away with the you know,
[18:38] "Oh, we'll do this."
[18:39] Problem though is that apparently people
[18:41] remember. Now, I would imagine it's not
[18:43] that big of deal and it's it's not that
[18:45] big of a deal. It's probably not super
[18:46] widespread. But if you're wondering why
[18:49] they are doing that, I can pretty much
[18:51] guarantee that that is exactly why,
[18:54] okay?
[18:55] Now, let's just get over here and let's
[18:57] let him explain what he believes is the
[18:59] illegality related to Tyler Boyer's
[19:02] Turning Point Action. And then
[19:06] I will leave you to watch his video
[19:08] without my hilarious commentary.
[19:11] success.
[19:12] One way is what Charlie Kirk was doing.
[19:15] He was creating spaces on college
[19:17] campuses where students could talk about
[19:19] capitalism and free markets.
[19:21] He was allowing free speech where people
[19:23] could make fun of being woke.
[19:26] Everyone likes this idea. Everyone wants
[19:29] more of this. If this was all Turning
[19:31] Point was doing, no one would have a
[19:34] problem with it.
[19:36] What people are now realizing from
[19:37] Turning Point's financial information is
[19:39] that they are involved in a whole lot
[19:41] more.
[19:43] Let us look again at the four nonprofit
[19:44] companies. We have Turning Point USA,
[19:47] Turning Point Action, Turning Point
[19:48] Endowment, and America's Turning Point.
[19:51] Three of these companies are 501c3
[19:53] organizations. Turning Point Action is a
[19:56] 501c4.
[19:58] The difference is that a 501c3 is not
[20:01] allowed to participate in political
[20:02] activity. A 501c4 can participate in no
[20:06] more than 50% political activity. And
[20:10] then there is also Turning Point PAC,
[20:11] which is 100% political activity. Now, I
[20:15] have seen arguments from people claiming
[20:16] that this is normal. They say it is
[20:18] normal for nonprofits to have multiple
[20:21] different companies.
[20:23] Not like this, it's not.
[20:25] Do not let people gaslight you about
[20:27] what's going on here.
[20:29] Let me explain what is unusual.
[20:32] You would normally create different
[20:34] shell companies for different types of
[20:35] activities. For instance, Turning Point
[20:38] Endowment is for their investments.
[20:40] That's clearly a different type of
[20:41] activity. It gets its own company. That
[20:44] makes sense.
[20:45] Turning Point Action is a 501c4. That's
[20:48] a different type of activity, so it gets
[20:50] its own company. What is this?
[20:54] Why is America's Turning Point separate?
[20:57] The company descriptions on the 990 form
[20:59] are very similar. It's basically
[21:02] education for young people.
[21:04] So, why are these two different
[21:06] companies?
[21:07] The only major difference that I see is
[21:10] that Charlie Kirk managed Turning Point
[21:11] USA and Tyler Boyer managed America's
[21:14] Turning Point.
[21:16] So, in a way, America's Turning Point
[21:18] existed to give Charlie Kirk plausible
[21:21] deniability. It gave Tyler Boyer his own
[21:24] 501c3 where he could do whatever he
[21:26] wanted and Charlie Kirk would not
[21:28] necessarily know about it.
[21:30] This is explained in the fine print of
[21:32] the 990 form for Turning Point USA,
[21:34] which says, "Turning Point USA's other
[21:36] educational programs include campus
[21:39] leadership programs which are hosted by
[21:41] Turning Point USA's related entity
[21:43] America's Turning Point with grants
[21:44] totaling 8.6 million dollars." So, what
[21:47] is Tyler Boyer doing with these
[21:49] students?
[21:51] It sounds like this leadership program
[21:52] is a pipeline for these students to go
[21:54] work for Tyler Boyer.
[21:57] I wonder what these students are doing
[21:59] that costs 8.6 million dollars.
[22:03] We're going to get into that in a
[22:04] minute.
[22:05] The other obvious question for most
[22:07] people is,
[22:08] "How does Turning Point get involved in
[22:10] so much political activity?" The only
[22:12] companies that are allowed to do
[22:13] political activity are up to 50% of
[22:16] Turning Point Action and Turning Point
[22:18] PAC. What happens in the real world is
[22:20] that a lot of 501c3s will perform what
[22:22] they call get-out-the-vote efforts or
[22:25] voter education.
[22:27] This is defined in Treasury regulation
[22:29] 1.527-6b5.
[22:32] "Get-out-the-vote campaigns must not be
[22:34] specifically identified by the
[22:36] organization with any candidate or
[22:39] political party." Yikes.
[22:42] Yikes.
[22:44] I feel like not only is that uh being
[22:48] violated here, it's probably being
[22:51] violated at literally every single 501c3
[22:53] that operates in the political space
[22:56] ever, right? Ever.
[22:58] But, you know what? I just realized, you
[23:00] know what? I've shown enough of his
[23:01] video for today. I don't want to take
[23:03] any more of it. I just want to end like
[23:05] this, okay?
[23:07] Jesse on Fire
[23:09] showed part of my video,
[23:11] but he did not get to the point where I
[23:14] make my most damning accusation.
[23:16] Tyler Boyer
[23:18] will rue the day
[23:20] that he sent that cease and desist to my
[23:22] home, which I used to wipe my bottom and
[23:25] then stir his drink.
[23:27] He is the kind of person that I would
[23:29] expect
[23:31] is a little [ __ ] who does whatever his
[23:33] wife tells him
[23:35] and then pretends to his buddies that he
[23:37] runs the roost. You don't run the roost,
[23:40] Tyler.
[23:41] The roost is not yours. You're a little
[23:44] [ __ ] and we all know it.
[23:46] And now
[23:48] I am going to let you see Tyler Boyer
[23:50] get owned by his wife in this exposé
[23:53] video that I got my hands on from
[23:55] someone who Tyler had mistreated in a
[23:58] former job.
