So, are you picking up what I'm putting down here? What is just revealed right here? Tyler Ber, the COO of TPUSA, who almost certainly has the ability to make decisions on who gets paid what and what vendors that they use at TPUSA. He's on the board of this super feed company with Lori Franvie. That's Erica Kirk's mom. What circumstances could there be where Erica Kirk's mom and Tyler Boyer could be on the board of the same company that TPUSA is sending millions of dollars to? That's not some kind of shady backdoor deal that everybody should be looking into. All right, Jesse on fire. Welcome back. So, we are going to continue our uh breakdown of the TPUSA audit that uh that Danks is doing because in this section right here, he gets into Tyler Boyer and uh this is wild, dude. I'm just going to say that right now. There is a partnership that he reveals in this section that is going to break your brain. Bottom line. Bottom line. Okay? Because again, and I will continue to repeat this, keep in mind Charlie Kirk ordered a do style audit of the books and then you know, I'm not smiling about that. It's just the you know what I like this is. You want to honestly know what this is like? You want to know what this is like? It's exactly like a movie like a like a Knives Out where you just keep investigating and every time that you, you know, get to a new scene, you find out that there's another person who's at this party who had a reason to kill the person who got killed. You know what I mean? Like, if you really think about it, it's like, well, he was he was leaving the Israel lobby. All Jesus, it was Israel. It's like, it must have been Israel. And then it's like the next second it's like well he also ordered an internal audit at TPUSA and look at all this money that these guys were taking in the exact way that you hypothesized Jesse on fire when you did that Twitter spaces uh you know I don't know a few months ago and I was like look this is how you would rob this place blind with being you know you'd have external contractors and if you control the purse strings then you could pay them an astronomical amount of money they kick you back cash whatever literally basically exactly what they were doing and uh you You know, so it's like Jesus, TPUSA did it themselves. And then it's like Erikica Kirk is a sleeper cell. It's Erica. And then of course you've got Tyler Robinson and the Little Trady Kids. And and a culture that people seem to be ignoring whereby Charlie gets killed and just regular Joe's on the street are like, "Yeah, Charlie's dead. Charlie's dead. Charlie's dead." And it's like, this is psychopathic. And so yeah, it's like knives out now. Keeping with the theme of this video, I want you, if you believe that Colonel Mustard killed Charlie Kirk with the exploding microphone in the dungeon, I'd like you to subscribe to the channel. If you guys don't know what that reference is, that's uh that's Clue. And actually, I don't think that there is a dungeon in Clue. But listen, if you've ever heard of this of the game or the movie Clue, then you should subscribe to this channel because I have too. And that means we have a lot in common. And you should also like this video because it's very helpful to the channel and I promise you're gonna like it. So, it's like you can just like preemptively like it because I promise you're going to actually like it. All right, so let's get into it right this second. All right, let's go. All right, let's rock and roll and let's let Danks take it away so we can react to his investigation. And again, real quick, the reason why I like reacting to his stuff is because he is incredible at investigating and he does not have as much experience with understanding what he's looking at as I do openly. He says that, you know, he says it himself. So, I can actually provide a lot of color to uh the stuff that's in his videos. >> In 2011, Tyler Boyer lost two condos to for >> Oh, by the way, uh that is Tyler Ber. You guys know who Tyler Boyer is, right? Tyler Boyer is the COO and uh the guy who said he was going to hitch his uh wagon to Charlie Kirk >> closure during a divorce. He had his wages garnished after a homeowners association sued him for thousands of dollars and unpaid fees. That was his financial situation less than maybe a decade ago, a little over a decade ago. So in 2021, he purchased a $1.95 million urban farm in Mesa, Arizona. The down payment was $650,000. So 10 years later, he's buying homes with 30% down in the multi-million dollar range. He also has a 2020 Taj ski bet registered under his wife's name that sells up to $200,000 on skiboat. You got a $200,000 skiboat. The actual only thing that matters is how are they getting this money? you know, how was the money going from wherever it was into your bank account where you're buying $200,000 boats and putting that much money down on a house? I'm just, you know, I mean, we'll get into it because at the end of the day, what would be most interesting to me is if there were specific partnerships with other people in this story that would blow people's minds, >> the used market. So, what happened between 2011 and 2021? Turning point happened. The form90 part 7 compensation table shows Ber has received $98,126 in 2018, $327,000 in change in 2020, 280,000 in 2021, 278,000 in 2022, 79,000 in 2023, 337,000 in 2024, and in grand total, that's $1.4 million in disclosed compensation. Look at how Okay, so that in and of itself is not that bad. Like I mean, you know, obviously I'm not saying $370,000 a year is not a lot. It's it's a lot, but it's not that much to where, you know, where it would look bad on a, you know, on a tax form where they're like, "Hey, I thought this is a nonprofit. You know, it's if they got $100 million going through it, you could pay your executives, you know, that much money." I listen. Hey, you want to see something crazy? Go look up how much uh Planned Parenthood CEO makes. Okay, a lot more than that. Like a lot more than that. But that's neither here nor there. Okay, that's neither here nor there. But what is here or there is the other places that he's getting money. How he's because 370 you don't like you you're not buying $200,000 boats. If you're making 370, unless you're, you know, relatively frugal, if especially if you have a $ 1.9 million house, okay, your payment on that is going to be, you know, I don't know, eight 810 $8,000 a month, something like that on a low side, depending on when he bought the house. I can't remember what year he said. So, you know, the rates or whatever, but I mean, that's an eight to $10,000 mortgage right there. And 8 to $10,000 a month, let's call it nine. That's $100,000 a year net, right? just on your house payment, nothing else. Nine, you know, $100,000 right there. So, if he's making 378 after taxes, what does that turn into? Okay. So, what he if he's only making 370, then he's paying, I don't know, 50 to 70% of his entire net money on his house payment if that was the only place that he was getting his money, which it's not. Those numbers actually stack up. Does your salary fluctuate up and down like that? Does it ever drop from over 300K to under 80K? That's super suspect. Also, super suspect. Then jump back up. That pattern raises questions about how compensation is being allocated across different entities. And here's why that matters. When someone's compensation jumps around like that across multiple related organizations, it can indicate compensation shifting. money moves from one entity to another to obscure the total amount being paid to an individual or to take an advantage over different reporting requirements. Yep. And this is exactly what we know that they were doing or at least that has been reported uh that they were doing when they were paying paying themselves from these like different organizations, you know, like ju even Charlie was making 400 from this one, 400, he was making one point uh 1.6 6 million but he was paying himself 400 out of four different organizations you know and again I am not throwing rocks at these guys at all okay don't don't get my don't twist my words this is what I would do also as long as it's not illegal now assuming that what we're now don't get me wrong I'm just talking about what we've listened to so far there is going to be more that maybe crosses uh some pretty big lines but here's the key to understand, okay? When you're talking about guys taking millions of dollars out of a nonprofit and it sounds it's like what on earth are they doing or giving themselves sweetheart deals or taking 400,000 from this one, 400,000 from this one. Okay, the reason why that would sound unethical, okay, is because it's donor money, right? People donate money to TPUSA and they think that that money is going to be going to these events that they do or it's going to be going to this, it's going to that, you know, helping campaigns, whatever, right? And then it turns out that the executives are taking tons of this money for themselves. Okay? Well, the assumption that that would be doing something out of the ordinary would be an incorrect assumption. Okay? A lot of these donors, they donate millions of dollars every year, millions every year. These are super wealthy donors. Super wealthy. And to them, a a person who's running an organization as big and powerful as TPUSA, who is taking $1.6 million a year, that is baby money to them. Boyer is receiving 337,000 from Turning Point entity one in a year when he's receiving $79,000 from another. The question is, what's the total? And is that total being clearly disclosed so donors and regulators can evaluate whether it's even reasonable? For donors, you might be giving to multiple Turning Point entities, thinking you're supporting different programs, but if it's the same person getting paid by all of them, your donations are going to the same pocket through different doors. Compensation for nonprofit executives is supposed to be reasonable. But reasonable compared to what exactly? If the compensation is split across multiple entities in ways that make the total hard to calculate, how can anyone determine if it's actually reasonable? Now, let me tell you about his company that he's on the board of and CEO of, Superfeed Technologies, because here we go. Okay, buckle up everybody. That was an appetizer. This is where we are about to eat a big fat bloody rare steak that has been marinating in uh you know Federal Reserve notes for two years because you're just going to you're going to chomp into it and be like this tastes like dirty money. It's like it is exactly what it is and it's uh being shared among some very interesting people. You know what I mean? That was a really weird metaphor. This is where the conflict of interest actually becomes explicit. Super Feed Technologies makes political applications. Their main product is called Early Vote Action, which is designed to help conservative volunteers contact voters. This app collects voter data, including contact information, location data, and political preference. Look at those names right there. I'm sorry. Let me go back just a little bit. Look at those names. Board chairman Tyler Ber. Okay. Lori Franie, who is who? Oh, right. That is Erica Kirk's mommy and Charlie Kirk. Okay. And so what that means is the Tyler Boyer and Lorie Franie, Erica's mom, are chopping money that comes into super feed. Okay, so just so you clear TPUSA if it pays super feed that money is going to get divided among Tyler Lori Charlie Kirk vote action which is designed to help conservative volunteers contact voters. This app collects voter data including contact information, location data and political preferences. The App Store privacy disclosure says that the data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by various other companies. Tyler Ber is the chairman of Super Feed's board and Turning Point is one of Super Feed's biggest clients. Now, where it gets explicit is that a TPUSA spokesman told reporters that Turning Point gets a discount on Super Feed services in exchange for Boyer's board service. So, let me repeat that. The nonprofit gets a discount in exchange for its COO serving on the vendor's board. That is the definition of quidd proquo. Uh I mean kind of not. It's the definition of a quid proquo is like I do you a favor, you do me a favor, right? like and the reason why this is so weird is because Turning Point receives actually I guess you know what I take that back. This actually is a quid proquo kind of like they're saying that because Tyler Boyer works for TPUSA and is also on the board of Super Feed. they get a discount because Tyler Boyer is like supposedly providing insight or vote, you know, he's on the board so he's got to vote for things or whatever on on Super Feed and you know, so basically he's loaning himself out to Super Feed just to support uh you know T like to get TPUSA a discount, right? Except the reason why I said it's not a real quid proquo is because that's nonsense. Like that's absolute nonsense. You are doing this because you are controlling TPUSA funds which you are paying to a company that you own and are on the board of. I mean, I'm sure he owns it, you know, like that's what's really going on with Erica Kirk's mom, by the way, in exchange for Boyer's board service. They just admitted it to a reporter and nobody's picked that up in 20. >> It's because it's not illegal, I don't think. Dude, that's what I'm saying is is hilarious because it's just ins it's just it's insane like this kind of thing. It's insane. That's I mean how don't you wonder how uh how don't you wonder how people like Ilhan Omar who's been a congresswoman for like you know five minutes compared to many of these senators and now she's worth $30 million. She had no money when she got there. Now she's worth 30 million. $30 million you guys. Okay. Ask someone who is actually like in you know someone who makes real money. Uh well like I don't know ask someone who makes a million five a year as an example. Okay like we were talking about with Tyler Boyer where I was like that's baby money to the big boys. Okay $1.5 million a year after taxes after whatever you know let's say it's a million dollars. Okay that's let's call it 90,000. Oh I'm sorry one point. Yeah. 90. Well, $125,000 gross a month sounds like a lot. It is a lot. It's an a It's a huge amount. 30 million. Do you know how long it would take you to save up $30 million if you're just if you're making $ 1.5 million a year? Okay. It'll take you 30 it'll take you 50 years, 60 years. Okay. So, just that like just to put it in perspective how much $30 million is, right? Like I'm telling you to to put to have a net worth of $30 million. It would require one point, you know, a $1.5 million salary for like ever. 30 is an enormous number. Enormous. And Ilhan Omar somehow got it. I wonder how she pulled that off, dude. You know, probably not because the system is 100% set up for people who are in office to rob it blind. And yeah, it's just ridiculous, man. That's why no legislation ever gets gets passed that would regulate this stuff. Like, do you understand how absurd it is that insider trading is allowed for people in Congress? Like, I know people talk about this and it's kind of like it's like a, you know, it's like a conversation, you know, talking point, but I don't think people really grasp how absurd, how insane that is. Okay, let me explain to you for real what this actually means for those of you who don't really know what it means. Okay, I'll give you an example. Martha Stewart, okay, Martha Stewart, very famous example, who was put in prison for uh insider trading. What happened was she was invested in some, if I remember correctly, something very close to this. Let's just say, you know, I'm not saying this is exactly right. If it's a little bit different, then you guys could write it in the comments, but it's conceptually this is exactly what happened. She's invested in some some pharmaceutical company that is developing a cancer drug or something. Okay. She finds out someone calls her and tells her, "Hey, they failed the clinical trial." Okay, like they failed the clinical trial, which means it's going to that's going to be really, really, really bad for the stock price when the public news of that hits the market, right? Okay. It's a publicly traded company. So some insider tells this investor, regular investor who owns common shares that they failed, right? So now Martha Stewart has inside information. Okay? So she calls her broker and sells out of that company because she doesn't want to be holding her stock in the or you know her shares in the company when that information hits the mainstream. So she sells out. She goes to prison for that. That's exactly what she did. Okay. again details of exactly like what drug it was or whatever could be a little bit different but that's that is exactly what happened exactly and in Congress okay so anyone any person who gets an inside tip based on real information that is provided by someone who works for that company if they trade on that if they sell or buy or or do you know options or whatever which I'll get into in a second they go to prison okay that is how they protect the glo you know the the the you know public markets from manipulation which is obviously not you know there's a lot of manipulation going but nonetheless that is that's those are the rules in Congress they have no rules against them trading against uh based on what they know from serving in Congress example okay so let's say that uh let's say that you're on one of these committees and one of the responsibilities of the committees is to choose a vendor to um provide cloud servers for some new initiative. Okay? And you're going to spend $2 billion or let's just say $8 billion over 10 years, right? So it's an $8 billion budget that you guys are in charge of. You go to the committee, you guys are listening to the pitches from Azure, from AWS, which is just Microsoft and uh Amazon, and then Google Cloud. And then you guys decide you're going to go ahead and go with Azure, which is the Microsoft company. Okay? It's an $8 billion deal. And so now that you've made that decision, you know that when that information hits the public market, you are going to see a massive increase in Microsoft stock. It is a it not not not maybe, it is a 100,000% certainty that that Microsoft will have a huge jump in the stock price right when that news hits the market. Okay. And in that case they are completely allowed to call to go on and uh and trade any in any way that they want. They can make they can do call options. Okay. Do you know what a put or a call option is? Without getting into the complete you know like the mechanics of it. You basically it's a much riskier investment. Okay. If you guess correctly then you make astronomical money especially if it's a short-term call option. Okay. Okay, so I'm going to explain it really quick and then I'll show you uh what kind of swings we're talking about in a short period of time. So basically what a call option or either a call or a put option is you are reserving a block of shares that you are going to be able to purchase at a future date and the date is locked in and so is the price that you can buy those shares at on that date. So you lose your entire investment if you're wrong. If it's below the the threshold that you have locked in the price for, you can lose the entire investment. But if you're right, the profits are [snorts] huge, especially if you bet short-term. I just did a whole thing breaking down how they actually work, and I watched it back and I'm like, half the people are going to turn the video off, even if other people are like, man, I never really understood how options work. It's it's it was too long. So, I apologize. We got to move on. It's it it's unbelievable how much money you can make if you know for sure what a stock is going to do using options. And it's totally legal for uh Congress people to do it even though they do know exactly what a stock is going to do because they are the ones who choose where the US government is going to spend these enormous amounts of money that literally don't exist in many cases in other industries. Like there aren't a lot of people who can spend the amount of money or I'm sorry and many corporations can spend the kind of money that the US government does. and for Congress totally illegal and they will never make that illegal because they all benefit from it and self-interest is the driving force behind everything. You know, that's that's basically people's main issue with capitalism is they're like, "Oh, well, you know, people ultimately human nature gets the best of them and then it breaks down whatever yada yada yada." Yeah. So, that's I understand the argument, right? But the reality is there's no perfect solution for anything because the opposite of that is social communism, right? Oh, well, no one owns anything. We we take the profit incentive out of everything and so everybody gets the same thing. It's fair. We divide it all up, yada yada yada. Okay. Well, the problem for everyone is that if you're going to get the same thing no matter what, what motivation do you have to do anything, to excel in anything, to do a better job, to not just not show up at work? Okay, there is none. There's no incentive for that. And so, people do not do what people need to do in order for society to work. And what does that mean? The only other way to incentivize people to do things is with fear. Okay? You have to incentivize people with either a carrot or a stick. That is just what it is. In a small hippie commune, the motivation can be the collective because you love these people and you love the community because it's small enough that you can have genuine feelings for everyone. At a at a countryized, you know, group that is not a thing, right? It's just not. It's too many people. And so people do not do what they are supposed to do because they're not incentivized with a positive. And so they get incentivized with a negative. That's why people always that's why they kill everybody. I mean, one of the reasons they kill everybody, you know, they kill them because they're they're they're dissident. Whoa. They kill them because they're dissident. And the other reason is because they are given absolute power. The people It's so hilarious. People do not understand communism. Oh my god. It's just so super fair, you know? Oh, there's not going to be these tyrants at the top. Yeah, right. It's the exact opposite of what they think. It is. It makes the smaller group 10 times more powerful than what we have now. That's not possible. Yes, it [ __ ] is. Okay, read a history book. And I am sorry that you do not understand human nature, but listen and maybe you'll learn something. >> 22 Superfeed's authority to do business in Arizona was revoked completely. The company was employing Carrie Lake and Jeff Dwit at the time. And a company that couldn't maintain its basic business license was getting paid to run voter data operations. And then hey, getting paid to run voter data operations. What do you think that means? And how much is it worth? You know what I mean? Like how much do you how much do you think that they got paid for running voter data operations? Charlie Kirk. And I I mean I feel bad, you know, like because I feel bad putting Charlie in this, but this is this is what we're talking about. This is how this is all done. Tyler Boyer and Erica Kirk. So now Tyler Boyer, Erica Kirk's mom are in on this little this little number, you know, where they're paying themselves for voter data. And Carrie Lake was also employed there, okay? Because they have a hundred million going through TPUSA. It is literally just legal corruption. But anyway, let's go ahead and continue. You know what I mean? because I feel a lot better about how I make money. I just talk and people watch my show and then YouTube is like, "Hey, we put these ads on your channel." And I'm like, "Cool. I read these ads." And I'm like, "Cool." And it feels all very up and up. I turn down ads all the time. I turned down a very big number this week, actually. And you can uh I might have actually mentioned this on my live stream. I might have actually me mentioned this on my live stream. It was like 8 G's, something like that. Eight G's. It was I can't I can't remember the exact number. It was It was less than 10 for sure and it was definitely more than seven, but whatever. And they wanted me to read an ad. Okay, they wanted me to read an ad that was promoting a new flu flu vaccine. And I was like, "No way. No [ __ ] way. I'm not doing it. There's no way." And by the way, those numbers are way higher than what I get paid normally. Like that's like a huge huge number for the record. And I said, "No, I'm not reading that ad." Okay. So, money where my mouth is, dude. I turned down that much money for uh, you know, for a 90-second ad because I'm not going to promote a flu vaccine given who I am and what I stand for. I'm not taking the money, Travis Kelce. Another board member is definitely worth mentioning, Lorie Frony. She sits on Super Feed's board. She's Charlie Kirk's mother-in-law. So, you have Kirk's mother-in-law and Kirk's COO both sitting on the board of a vendor that gets paid by Kirk's nonprofit. See, the problem with that is that in nonprofit governance, independence actually matters. When a nonprofit pays a vendor, there should be someone checking that the vendor is providing real value at a fair price. That's how you protect donor money. But who's checking super feed? Hey, Tyler Boyer is, dude, of course. Wait, isn't Tyler Ber on the board and a partner at Super Feed? Uh, yeah, he is. So, he's the one who's supposed to make sure that these deals are on the up and up when he benefits from every dollar that TPUSA pays a super feed. Yeah, that doesn't sound right. No, it doesn't sound right, but it is what is happening, you know. But listen, you don't think that he would prioritize self-interest over ethical business, right? Come on. Come on. You don't think that he would, I don't know, be involved in some kind of nefarious thing if someone was taking a hard look at what they were doing, you know, even though Charlie was on the board also. So, probably unlikely that that particular deal would have led to a conspiracy to put Charlie in the ground. But, you know, this is not the only deal. It's not the only deal. Tyler Boyer is on Super Feed's board. He benefits when Super Feed gets contracts. Lorie Francy is on Super Feed's board. She's Charlie Kirk's mother-in-law. She's not going to challenge payments to a company that benefits her family. And neither is Charlie Kirk. The people who should be asking, "Is this a good deal for the nonprofit are the very same people who actually benefit the most." That is not oversight. That's [ __ ] The spokesman quote makes >> Whoa, whoa, whoa. I don't know about [ __ ] It is working exactly as it is supposed to work for the people involved. And again, just to reiterate, okay, the big donors, they know that these guys do this. Of course, they know because the big donors are all wealthy guys who got wealthy by doing things like this. You know what I mean? The game's rigged. The game has always been rigged. This is a rigged game. And honestly, this is to them these like to the to the donors who really benefit from these things. They are peasants, dude. These guys are are influential peasants to them. Now, in Charlie's case, he's is a potential future president of the United States. So, you know, he's a little bit different, but Tyler Boyer is a is a is a peasant to them. You know, they might take him on a hunting trip or two, but he's not one of them. Now, doesn't mean he won't be at some point. Like, you know, I mean, I don't know if his status would be sold to soul to the devil yet, you know, un like like the video that we uh looked at this morning. If you guys have watched the video that I dropped this morning about uh you know, satanic cabals and uh that like if you have not watched that, watch it. Trust me, watch it. Even worse, they admitted Turning Point gets a discount in exchange for Boyer's board service. Again, that's quid proquo. you know about that if you've ever worked a job. You're always taught about quidd proquo and all these freaking organizations and there's also no chance that they are giving TPUSA a discount. That's just no. No, it's the exact opposite. Okay, the exact opposite. TPUSA is not getting a discount. TPUSA is paying way more for what they're getting than what they should because the money is going to the people who at TPUSA are the ones making the decision to pay it out >> companies and all these. Of course, that's speculation, but it's pretty strong speculation based on my understanding of all of humans in history, >> HR meetings and stuff. The COO's position on the vendor's board is part of the compensation arrangement. That's exactly the kind of insider dealing that nonprofit law is designed to prevent. And for donors, your money is going to a company where people are approving the payments that have financial personal interest in those payments being approved. It's a conflict of interest. For Ber personally, sitting on a vendor's board while approving payments to that vendor is a textbook conflict of interest. If the IRS determines he received excess benefits through this arrangement, he faces personal liability. Now, we're going to talk about fundraising because this is where the biggest personal liability, by the way, all it means is uh is it's about like taxing basically like it's they're like cash penalties. These are not uh like there's no like prison here. Now, we've been going for uh almost 35 minutes already and I think that I have to cut this off because I don't generally do videos that are longer than this under normal circumstances. But what I'm going to do is we're going to get into Stacy Sheridan and the fundraising in my next uh iteration of this series where I'm reacting to uh to the information that Danks is putting out because I have a lot of color I can provide on that. You know, honestly, I really like doing this because like I said, Danks does such good uh he does such good investigative work and like his portion that I reacted to was no way six minutes. Six minutes and I did a 36 minute video. 36 minute video. So, hey, don't tell me that I'm just sitting on other people's research, dude. Don't you dare tell me that. I'm That's even impressive for me, dude. 30 minutes of commentary on six minutes of uh content. I feel pretty good about that, dude. I'm not going to lie. So, uh but yeah, we'll get into Stacy Sheridan next because that is a person who is making a lot of money and she made a big mistake. She made a big mistake in ter at least if if what Den says is correct, then she anyway she did something. I'll tell you right now what it is. Well, I won't be specific cuz I'll tell you that in the other video. But what she did is she took a specific action that made it very clear to me that she was trying to hide the fact that she was being paid money. Okay? And uh at least that's the way I interpreted it. I don't see how else you would interpret it. Okay? And again, we'll get into that uh lately, but we're talking millions of dollars. And uh but that that woman is an absolute savage. And I mean that like you don't you don't you don't be the uh the head of fundraising for an organization that takes in a hund00 million a year from like powerful political you know politically connected donors. Unless you are like a real serious player. As a matter of fact, before we even go I want to look let me see if I can find uh let me see if I can find something of hers. I just want to see what she looks like when she talks because I bet you she is very very smart, dude. Um, Stacy Sheridan. Oh my gosh, look at her, dude. Man, before I even click on that. Oh my god, that is a smart This is a really intelligent woman, dude. exchange cards and I thought nothing of it. What ultimately made me want to join Charlie's cause and Charlie's team because he began a quest to hire me after meeting me. I was reluctant at first, but it was his naive audaciousness to change the world that ultimately sold me. It was the best decision I've ever made and I've never looked back. >> Dude, I've got her pegged. I've got her pegged. Uh she actually she can be like close with people. Like she can actually have genuine relationships, but she is super suspicious of people until she gets to know them really well. you know, like if she's early on in a relationship, she'll be very ky with them until she knows that she can trust them. Uh, and if but man, if you cross her, she uh she'll never forget ever. She will never forget even something small like if she decides that you did something devious on purpose, you will never be able to get back in her good graces ever. She might pretend if you have use to her. Like if you're useful in some way, she will use you and be as nice as whatever she needs to be in order to get what she wants from you. But she will never trust you ever again. And uh yeah, she's I mean super smart. She also is the kind of person who will get you silently. She'll get you silently. She'll set something up that will like the person will not know it came from her and she will never admit that she did it. And her ideal situation would be absolutely no collaborators. Something she could put in motion by herself so that no one on earth knows that she's the one who did it. But she'll do it. All right. I love you guys. I like.
