The CHARLIE KIRK Cover-Up: the darkest rabbit hole I've ever investigated

I mean, there's just no way. In the turbulent landscape of American conservatism, the assassination of Charlie Kirk has turned into a pivotal moment that has not only shaken the foundations of our country, but has also served to further unite and divide the people of America. One thing though that I think we can all agree on is that a government will always lie to its people. A government will always seek to preserve itself. And if that means lying directly to the faces of its own constituents, that's what it will do. And that's what I believe is happening right here. That's playing out right in front of our very eyes. If you want to check where I got the information for this video, there's a resources document in the description. All parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But without further ado, let's just dig right into the story. So, this video is not going to be political. I'm not going to include any opinions whatsoever about politics. But I think that by the end of this rundown, you are going to believe not only that the government's lying to you, but that the United States government, mainly the FBI under Cash Patel, thinks that you are a stupid, bumbling idiot who cannot possibly tell true from false. I mean, some of the facts that I'm about to present you with are comical. And it doesn't matter if you loved Charlie Kirk or if you hated Charlie Kirk. This story, what we're talking about right now is about deep, deep corruption within the United States government, and it flows into all other aspects of the US government and our daily lives. Really quick shout out. If you want to watch these videos fully uncensored, please consider joining me on Patreon. There's a link in the description. YouTube frequently demonetizes, age restricts, or even removes my videos. So, thank you to everybody on Patreon who is helping to keep this show running. So, the official story of Charlie Kirk's shooting goes as follows. If you're somehow unaware at this point, on August 27th of this year, Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk's organization, announced the American Comeback Tour with the inaugural or first event scheduled for September 10th at Utah Valley University, UVU, in Oram, Utah, expecting around 3,000 attendees. Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist and Trump ally, had voiced concerns for his own safety in a speech that he delivered in June of this year. And in that speech, eerily, he had highlighted what he believed were the risks that came with holding these campus events, the dangers of appearing on college campuses, talking to kids, and just being out there in the open. Meanwhile, at around that same time, according to the FBI, 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson, an electrical apprentice from St. George Utah with no criminal history began fixating on Charlie Kirk for reasons at this point that are yet to be fully explained in the official story. However, at some point, according to officials, Tyler Robinson decided that he was going to kill Charlie Kirk. So, he allegedly came in possession of a budget hunting rifle in early September and began scouting Utah Valley University via social media videos. Now, in early September 2025, a week or so before the shooting, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson acquires that rifle that he would allegedly go on to use in the shooting, and engraved the casings with taunts like, "Hey, fascist catch." and other references to online memes. On the evening of September 9th, 2025, Charlie Kirk arrived in Utah. However, it should be noted that no metal detectors were implemented at the outdoor amphitheater. Early that next morning, Tyler Robinson, the future shooter, takes off from his home over 300 m away and drives his gray Dodge Challenger towards Orum. On September 10th, 2025, at 8:29 a.m., Tyler Robinson parks on the UVU campus dressed in a black t-shirt with an American flag and eagle, jeans, a baseball cap, sunglasses, and backpack, and attempts to blend into the student crowd. The FBI later stated that at some point while he was on the roof of the building preparing to take the fatal shot at Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson changes his clothing into a different set of clothes. They said that he arrived on scene wearing something different. The fatal shooting occurred during Charlie Kirk's midday address, shattering the events patriotic atmosphere and triggering a rapid security response amidst screams from the crowd and rapid evacuations. When the shooting occurred, Charlie Kirk was mid-sentence discussing mass shootings with a student when allegedly a single supersonic round from Tyler Robinson's rifle fired from a rooftop struck him right in the neck. >> All right, great. Uh, so do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years? >> Too many. [Applause] >> It's five. Okay. Now, five is a lot, right? I'm going to give you I'm going to give you some credit. Do you know Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? >> Counting or not counting gang violence? >> Great. >> The time was 12:23 p.m. And when the bullet struck Kirk in the neck, it caused him to immediately collapse and almost instantly die despite bystanders and members of Charlie Kirk's team performing onstage CPR and later taking a medevac to a hospital. According to the official story, after shooting Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson then changed back into his original clothing, disassembled his rifle, stuffed all of that in his backpack, then fled the scene. According to the FBI, Robinson left evidence at the scene, like palm prints and a Converse footprint and a screwdriver with his DNA on it. Immediately, a UVU campus lockdown ensued, and the FBI launched a national manhunt, offering up a $100,000 reward leading to the capture of the shooter. Videos of that graphic moment immediately went viral, which obviously amplified the shock that people all across the world felt when they first heard the story and heard of Charlie Kirk's death. The 33-hour pursuit of Tyler Robinson, according to the FBI, involved over 200 interviews and 7,000 tips, culminating in Tyler's surrender on September 11th. But what led to his surrender? Well, according to the official story, Tyler's mother recognized him in FBI released suspect photos that began to circulate around midday on September 11th, despite his earlier text to his mom claiming he was homesick in St. George, Utah the previous day. This discrepancy that Tyler's mother noticed prompted her to confront him on the phone, which led to a partial confession where Robinson admitted that he killed Charlie Kirk and expressed fears of a violent police confrontation and even told his mom that he was thinking of selfdeion. Tyler's parents, registered Republicans with no prior indication of their son's radicalization, immediately sought help from a trusted family friend who just so happened to be a retired deputy sheriff and a youth pastor to deescalate the situation and negotiate safe terms for Tyler's surrender, emphasizing that they did not want a SWAT raid on their home. And from that point on, the FBI knew that they had their man, and they then swept in and arrested him. Now, interestingly, Tyler Robinson's words after his arrest have revealed no distinct ties to any organized groups, but his alleged online paper trail has revealed personal ideological grievances. After Tyler's arrest, charges followed swiftly with prosecutors publicly saying they want the death penalty for the politically motivated act, which has sparked debates here in America on assassination culture, security lapses, and violent rhetoric. Vigils, Trump's Medal of Freedom award, and Charlie Kirk's September 21st memorial have drawn massive crowds. While polls in America show that people are becoming more receptive to partisan political violence, as of September 24th, the day that I'm recording this video, investigations are continuing into the potential online radicalization of Tyler Robinson. So, it's very long-winded. I'm sorry. I know you guys probably know that story and it's the facts are facts are familiar, but it's very important to stress to you the clear and concise version of the story that the FBI is going with. So that now like a vulture on a corpse, we can go in and pick it apart piece by piece. And yes, that is the official story. So according to those around him, like his friend, family members, people like that. But most importantly, not according to Tyler himself. Tyler Robinson essentially ratted on himself after planning and executing a perfect getaway and then was taken into custody. But curiously, here's one of the first things that sticks out to me. Tyler Robinson to date has not admitted to the authorities that he is the shooter. He has not spoken to them during interrogations or interviews, and he's provided them with no official corroboration of the story or timeline. He has not stated that it was him that, you know, pulled this whole thing off. He is not the shooter. He said I couldn't find anything that he said. Like I don't think he's spoken to the authorities at all. Kind of like, not to draw a comparison, but Lee Harvey Oswald was kind of pulling similar stuff. He was more denying that he was a shooter. Um, but it's just kind of a similar vibe to me. Um, in the wake of the JFK shooting, this is where the cracks in the official story, in my opinion, really begin to surface. So, I do want to state this is all opinion. This is just what I'm pointing out. These are the factual things that I believe do not make any sense and point to some sort of more some sort of larger more malignant narrative that could exist surrounding the shooting of Charlie Kirk. I'm not going to suggest to you a person who I think did this or a group or a country. I am simply going to put the facts in front of your face. Then you can decide. Does this make sense to you or does it not? And if you want to verify everything that I'm saying, I always post a resources document in the description of this show. So, go access the resources document and check out all this evidence, draw your own conclusions yourself. Before we get into all the stranges, though, I want to show you a somewhat unrelated clip. So, I want you to remember all of this evidence, this theory, this story has been presented mainly by the FBI, which is led currently by a man named Cash Patel. Now, interestingly, the FBI immediately took almost all the credit for the investigation and for Tyler Robinson's capture, even though they really didn't even do all that much. It was Tyler Robinson's, you know, parents or family friend, according to the story, who turned him in. They gave the solid lead. The FBI was way behind trying to figure out who he was. But for a moment, let's focus on Cash Patel. Now, a lot of people I know online are just naturally going to trust the FBI. They're going to trust the government. They think that the government cannot lie to them, that they would never lie to them, that they do no wrong. But I think in recent years, we've seen, you know, conspiratorial thought used to be more of like a right-leaning, right-wing thing that people were slammed for believing in. You know, it was like almost a derogatory term to be called conspiracy theorist. And it still is for some a very small group of people. It's it's still a a a slanderous term when you call someone, oh, conspiracy theorist, but as we're seeing with Epstein, how many videos have I made on Epste? I've got so many more coming. That issue is uniting the right and the left because you can clearly see in real time a government cover up being put into place. You are actually, it's unprecedented. We are watching as these as these events transpire the cover up not only form but get sealed into place, glued into place, whatever you'd say. Like you're seeing these people put the puzzle pieces in and then apply epoxy or I don't know whatever the hell resin over the top so that it can never be broken again. It's absolutely crazy. And the guy in charge of the FBI right now is obviously Cash Patel. Back in when was it? July, early July or mid July, whenever that was, Cash Patel, the FBI, the DOJ, Pam Bondi released that infamous document, that presser release, whatever it was, whatever you'd call that, the memo, I guess, saying that Epste never trafficked anybody. He was essentially completely innocent. He never trafficked a soul that he definitively selfdeed and a number of other things. But basically just saying that all the evidence that shows that Epstein was a trafficker is basically fabricated or doesn't exist. Now with all of this evidence that I mean there's a ton of evidence that has existed surrounding Epstein before that memo was released by the DOJ and FBI. But in the months after they stated Epstein never trafficked anyone, there's been a ton more evidence that's emerged. Like so much more evidence. And they have committees investigating all this and bipartisan groups trying to bring some sort of truth to the Epstein situation. And yet Cash Patel just a few days ago, this isn't a long time ago. I think this was on this was last maybe Friday or Monday. It's Wednesday right now. I can't remember how long ago this was, but it was just a few days ago. Cash Patel actually said this. Check this out. Now, I know that there's a lot of talk about Epstein, and I'm here to testify that the original sin in the Epstein case was the way it was initially brought by Mr. Aosta back in 2006. The original case involved a very limited search warrant or set of search warrants and didn't take as much investigatory material it should have seized. If I were the FBI director, then it wouldn't have happened. >> You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to besides himself? >> Himself? There is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he traffked to other individuals. And the information we have again is limited. >> So the answer is no one >> for the information that we have >> in the files >> in the case file. >> Okay, >> that's right. As you're seeing right there, Cash Patel, the damn stoogge himself, is still sitting there saying that Epstein never trafficked anyone, saying there's no credible evidence, which is just it's just mindblowing. There is actually so much evidence, whether it's paper trails and financial documents and associations and flight logs and victim testimonies and corroborating evidence and things found in Epstein's homes and the goddamn fact that Gain Maxwell was convicted of trafficking. He's just ignoring that little factoid. It's just like it's such a bold-faced lie that everybody knows is a lie. We all know that that's a lie, Cash. Everybody knows it's a lie. And yet he says it with that [ __ ] eating expression on his face and just forces it down your throat as if just saying it a bunch of times is going to make it true. But that to you should show you straight off the bat the kind of FBI that we're dealing with. Now, I know a lot of people I never thought that there was going to be really transparency with this administration, obviously, but I know a lot of people out there thought Cash Patel seems like a guy who's not been involved in whatever you want to call it, the swamp, and he's going to come in and be honest and transparent and Dan Bonino too, and Pam Bondi, all these guys are they're like the dream team of heroes that are going to bring light to the Epstein situation and do this and that. All of them have been corrupted. And you could tell, I mean, once they got in there, they probably got threatened. They were told, you know, you're going to lose everything. We're going to blackmail you. We're going to plant evidence on your devices. We're going to kill you. I don't know what they what they would have said, but you see from all of them now that they they for years were saying the government is lying. And then the moment they joined the government, they're like, "Yeah, the lie is the truth." And they just started lying. So once a lie is told, a person's credibility begins to crumble. the legitimacy and the integrity of the institution itself also begins to crumble with that of its leader. So if Cash Patel's lying to you about Epstein, and I I don't know how you could believe what he said there, what else is he lying about? If Cash and his crew can lie about Epstein trafficking kids, why couldn't they lie about Tyler Robinson and a event that has completely fundamentally rearranged and reshaped the American political landscape in so many so many ways? Why couldn't they lie about that and why wouldn't they? Well, before we get any further, let's take a look at the absolute mountain of evidence found within the Kirk assassination story that makes no sense. So, the origins of the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, form the bedrock upon which the FBI's timeline and sequence of events teeters. And yet, even this foundation cracks under just a small amount of scrutiny. So, right after the shooting occurred, media reports and initial leaks from law enforcement painted Tyler Robinson, known back then just as the suspect out to have been a local student at Utah Valley University. Everyone was saying in the news, "This guy had to be a student here. He was so familiar with the campus." It was stated repeatedly that he had to have been a student because he seemingly had an incredibly intimate familiarity with the campus layout. He knew the campus, the ins and outs of the campus like the back of his hand. News anchors and federal law enforcement agents publicly emphasized that this could really be the only way to plausibly explain how the shooter had ascended completely undetected through offlimits areas in school buildings, through restricted corridors, and through seemingly hidden hallways up to that rooftop vantage point. I mean, to get up to that area, I've read and heard from individuals that have reported on this story, it's really hard. like normal students. If you're just a student at UVU, you can't just walk up to that rooftop. You can't just access that rooftop if you want to go up there. I don't know exactly what it is. Maybe key cards that you have to scan to open up doors. There's like uh there's no way that you can just walk up there. I mean, I went to school at UT in Austin and it's like I can't just get up to the rooftop of a building if I want to. Like it's a college campus. They are very secure places and they think of these things. So, when it comes to Tyler Robinson, a lot of people have said that the shooter wouldn't really have known how to get up there unless they had really studied the area for themselves, step by step, walking through the process. But according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson only used online resources to construct his assassination plan. He, according to the FBI, never physically visited the university to scope out this area prior to the shooting. Now, that may change. They may find a video that they purport shows Tyler Robinson four months ago looking at the area or something like that. I don't know what they will say in the future, but as of right now, they're saying he figured out how to get to the rooftop going through these restricted areas simply by looking online. So that initial version of the story that was being told throughout the news implied that the shooting itself was simply a spontaneous act of violence born out of proximity and opportunity, suggesting that the shooter that day was perhaps a disgruntled attendee that had been at Charlie Kirk's rally that had been radicalized by hearing Charlie Kirk's fiery rhetoric and decided to kill him. Basically, the initial theory was that this was somebody who went to the school, who knew how to get up there, who had been to the building hundreds of times, who knew it inside and out, who had just snapped that day and decided, you know what? I'm just going to go kill him. However, as the investigation unfolded, this detail was abruptly revised, and the official story began to change. You see, Tyler Robinson himself had attended a different school approximately 3 hours away from UVU in the middle of very rural Utah. nowhere near UVU. To carry out the attack, for example, he would have had to have planned an extremely deliberate, meticulously planned out road trip. A journey like this from where Tyler Robinson lived to the UVU campus would require not just a intense logistical planning like planning for fuel stops, aiding security checkpoints, etc., but also an almost preient reconnaissance of the venue. How, ask yourself this question. How did a 22-year-old who was ostensibly operating completely alone by himself map out parking spots that were obscured from the main entrances identify a low-slung building that he would be able to climb and pinpoint the exact spot on the rooftop and necessary angle for him to take a clean 150 to 200 yard shot. Online forums, particularly a viral Reddit thread in r/conspiracy, have been buzzing with user submitted maps showing the campus's hightraic zones and have argued that any outsider who crossed through some of these restricted areas required to cross through to get to that rooftop would have triggered some sort of alert or notification from the events security detail. A security detail that day which included offduty officers and private contractors. The FBI's pivot on Robinson's school affiliation, which was reported by Al Jazera in a September 12th fact check underscores a pattern of fluidity when dealing with the facts of this case that seemed to erode trust straight from the jump. The facts are changing back and forth and going forward and backwards. And he was here, now he wasn't here, and he was a student, now he wasn't a student. And I get it, it's confusing at first when it comes to a case like this, and reporters want to report anything and everything, any lead that pops up. But this doesn't to me seem like a mere investigational oversight. This seems to be a narrative slate of hand that requires us, the viewer or the reader or whatever, to assume that Tyler Robinson's virtual scouting of his sniper hideout was 100% absolutely flawless without any mistakes. His drive to the location was unremarkable and on time, and his execution of every event that day was seamless. assumptions that multiply like unchecked variables in a deeply flawed equation. Now, one thing that I find extremely strange about this narrative is Tyler Robinson's alleged clothing odyssey, a series of clothing swaps that to me almost seem comedic because they're just so damn hard to even believe in the first place. You see eyewitness accounts and grainy CCTV stills first captured Tyler Robinson that day arriving to the UVU campus in casual jeans and a shirt emlazed with an eagle and an American flag wearing a hat and glasses easily blending into the student crowd milling about the amphitheater waiting for Charlie Kirk to arrive. Yet, according to the FBI affidavit released in Utah's fourth district court, after Tyler somehow inexplicably makes his way all the way up to the roof without being seen by anybody, keep in mind, making his way up there without raising a single eyebrow or raising any suspicion, while he's on the rooftop, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson then sheds this outfit and puts on a nondescript gray tracksuit. Now, people have said that he probably put this gray tracksuit on, presumably to hide his silhouette so that when he was on the roof itself, no one would see him. But then, this is where it gets weird. After taking that single fatal perfect shot at Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson completely changes his clothing again while he's still on the roof and then changes back into the clothing that he was wearing when he had first arrived on campus before leaping down from the rooftop. That's a very, very important detail. So, he gets on the roof, changes clothes into this gray tracksuit, kills Charlie Kirk, then changes back into his other clothes, all before leaving the roof again. Keep in mind, this change of clothing was stored in a tiny little backpack that Tyler Robinson carried up to the rooftop with him. a backpack that was no larger than a school satchel, a backpack which also, according to the FBI, purportedly housed the disassembled rifle, his tools, and perhaps even more. And this to me is where the timeline makes no sense. And that's because according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson brought the 306 rifle up there with him to the rooftop, stored in that same backpack. the the gun was broken down in the backpack when he brought that up to the rooftop with him. So, he goes up there with the change of clothes and the fully disassembled rifle. Then on the rooftop, he changes into that other outfit and then fully assembles the rifle while he's up there, takes the shot and kills Charlie Kirk. Then after killing Charlie Kirk and before hopping off of the rooftop, Tyler Robinson fully disassembles his rifle and changes his clothing and stores the change of clothes and the rifle in that small backpack, all before running across the roof and leaping back down to the ground to escape. So, to put that into perspective, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson performed an entire full body clothing change twice and assembled and disassembled a large rifle, then stored everything in that tiny little bag in how long would that be? Well, at maximum, what I'm finding out here after doing some research, in just 34 seconds. And that's at maximum. So, 34 seconds. That's the amount of time that Tyler Robinson had to change his clothing, put the clothing in the backpack, fully disassemble an entire rifle, a huge rifle, and store that rifle in that small backpack, and zip the backpack up in just 34 seconds. You see, news sources report that Charlie Kirk was shot and killed at 12:23 p.m. that day. That's the time given for the moment that the shot rang out, and I couldn't track down an exact second for when that happened or anything like that, but it's 12:23 p.m. However, according to the video footage that was released by the FBI, you can see at 12:23 and 34 seconds, you can see Tyler Robinson running across the rooftop to make his escape with the rifle already fully disassembled and his clothing already fully changed and everything stored in the backpack. So, bear with me for a second. Let's just assume right here that Charlie Kirk that day was shot immediately at 12:23 p.m. right on the dot. 1223 and zero seconds. That would give, according to the FBI and the released footage, that would give Tyler Robinson only 34 seconds to fully change his clothing, like full body clothing, fully disassemble his rifle, stuff all that into a tiny backpack, and then take off running. I just personally don't see how that could physically be possible. But also, there's something else curious that I noticed. So, there's also a video that was released taken by somebody that was present that day when the shooting erupted, a bystander that was filming the crowd that shows the suspect just moments, seconds after shooting Charlie Kirk running across the rooftop. But that doesn't make much sense to me. If the suspect was already running, that further shaves down the time that he would have needed to change the clothing and disassemble the rifle. Now, he probably had maybe 20 to 25 seconds to change clothes and break down the gun, but also he was already running immediately after the shooting. When did he stop to do all of this? Where did he stop to change clothes and break down the gun? None of this really adds up to me. But I wanted to go even further. So, I asked an AI program, Grock, to be specific, to help me figure out the exact approximate length between where Tyler Robinson would have taken that fatal shot and the location on the rooftop where he seems to jump off of the roof in the footage released by the FBI. There are a bunch of maps online that people have posted and news outlets have posted showing, you know, an aerial view of where he took the shot, where he left the roof, all of that. and Grock, my AI program, used resources to figure all this out. It analyzed maps and at the end, it gave me an approximate distance of 246 ft. 246 ft from where the shot was taken at Charlie Kirk and from where the shooter eventually jumped from the roof to the ground. I then asked Grock how long it would take an adult male to run that full distance, 246 ft. And the results were interesting. For an average adult male, Grock theorized that it would take them 24 or so seconds. But for a trained sprinter, Grock theorized it would have taken them about 12.15 seconds. Now, I haven't seen any information stating that Tyler Robinson was a trained sprinter or that he physically trained for this shooting, but I do also think that he was running faster than just an average jogging pace. He was in a bit of a rush. So, let's just for this kind of equation figure out a number in the middle there. So going off of this data, the run Tyler's run from the shooting location to the location on the roof where the shooter jumped down would have taken Tyler approximately, and this is just according to my calculations, about 18 1/2 seconds. So in the footage that's released, Tyler or the shooter arrives to that corner on the rooftop where he eventually jumps down at about 1223 and 50 seconds. So if you subtract 18.5 seconds from 50, you get about 31 12 seconds. So that is 31 12 seconds past 12:23 p.m. So 31 12 seconds after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed. If you're going with the theory that Charlie Kirk was shot right at 12:23 in the afternoon and 0 seconds, I think that it was probably more like 12:23 and 5 seconds or something like that. Now, interestingly, in the footage released by the FBI, we first see Tyler Robinson or the shooter on the rooftop at 12:23 and 34 seconds. So, if we go back about 3 seconds from then, that's when he would have had to start running from the location to get to the rooftop to make the timeline of the video make sense. So, when you subtract all these numbers and make sense of all this, that leaves you with about 30 seconds. In order to make this timeline work, that means that Tyler Robinson, after taking the shot at Charlie Kirk, would have had to have fully changed his clothing, fully disassembled his rifle, and fully stored all of those components in his backpack before zipping it up in just under 30 seconds. We know that he wasn't doing this as he ran because we can clearly see that when he enters the frame at 12:234 in that footage released by the authorities, Tyler or the shooter isn't fiddling with anything. He isn't changing clothing. He isn't storing anything in his bag. So, all of this would have had to have happened before that. In addition, I don't know, like I just said, exactly when Charlie Kirk was shot exactly. I mean, down to the second. He could have been shot at 1223 and 0 seconds, 1223 and 5 seconds, 1223 and 10 seconds. I just don't know. But it is important when you consider the timeline. Every second counts here. But also, I don't believe that he was shot exactly at 12:23 on the dot. And so, if that's true and he was shot a little after 1223, that would give Tyler Robinson even less time to be able to pull off this magic trick. You're going to go down from 30 seconds to probably 20 seconds. 20 seconds to change his clothing, store that gun, zip it up, and then take off running to make it on camera at 123 and 34 seconds. Now, this doesn't make a lot of sense, does it? Well, it gets even crazier. Once again, I asked my AI program, Grock, a different question. This time, I asked Grock, "How long would it take for someone to fully disassemble a Mouser 3006 bolt-action rifle, the gun that Tyler Robinson allegedly used to kill Charlie Kirk?" And Grock's answer was shocking to me. Initially, the AI program told me that it would most likely for someone with familiarity with the weapon itself, take someone somewhere between 6 to 11 minutes to fully disassemble the gun and store it in a small backpack. But, you know, I thought maybe I should ask Grock again, what if the person disassembling the rifle is in an extreme hurry, like they're in a really big rush. And the answer to me was still shocking. After regenerating an answer, Grock stated that it would have taken at minimum somewhere between three to five minutes to fully break down the gun and store it in a backpack. 3 to 5 minutes. And that's going extremely fast. Like you know exactly what you're doing, exactly what screw to unscrew, exactly what to put where. I mean, we're talking about a large rifle here that just fired a fatal shot at someone. And according to the official timeline of events, that weapon was fully broken down, fully stored, and Tyler Robinson completely head to toe had changed his outfit in just under 30 seconds. Probably more like 15 to 20 seconds if you account for the fact that Charlie Kirk was probably shot a little after 1223. Yeah, it's pretty unbelievable, right? By the way, if you want to read through the detailed breakdowns of this information that I received from Grock, I'm going to include the full text of this analysis and these breakdowns in the resources document that can be found in the show description. And just keep that in mind. You just killed somebody and you have somewhere between 15 and 30 seconds to fully deconstruct a weapon that you just used to kill somebody to fully change your clothing head to toe and to stuff all that. Store it in a backpack that you zip up in about 15 to 30 seconds somewhere in there before you're seen on camera running across a rooftop to make an escape. It's just so highly improbable to me. It's just it's weird. It's really weird, man. After learning this information about those clothing changes and the rifle deconstruction, the news station Newsmax ran a segment on September 15th where they interviewed a former FBI profiler who likened the FBI's timeline of events to a quote spy novel plot end quote and questioned the physical feasibility of this explanation amidst the sweatinducing September heat. You see, according to acue.com, on that day in St. George, Utah, when the shooting happened. The high was 95° and as we can see in that footage, the sun was shining bright that day. It was also almost exactly midday when the shooting happened, meaning that it would have been incredibly hot outside. And in my opinion, sweat would have definitely served to further complicate Tyler Robinson's plan of changing clothing and disassembling the rifle. I mean, I'm assuming that he was already sweaty from just being nervous about killing someone and stuff like that. I mean, sweaty clothes or just having slippery hands, all of that could lead to losing one or two seconds in the timeline, but every second here is so important because it just gets more and more unbelievable. Exusers under the hashtag Kirklo swap have me'd piece of information relentlessly. It should also be stated here that the FBI claims that they found no pieces of fabric, no clothing left behind, no broken zipper, no sock, nothing left over from Tyler Robinson's clothing changes. Meaning, if you really think about it, that he pulled off these stunning clothing swapping feats with zero error. He didn't break a button. He didn't snap a zipper. He didn't rip a piece of clothing. He left not even a single shred of fabric behind. He was immaculately clean and immaculately precise. Such details, when fully fleshed out, transform, in my opinion, the FBI's lone gunman narrative to some, into a logistical comedy of errors, which begs the question, was this shooting really the result of a premeditated precision? Or were all of these details added in after the fact, after the shooting had happened quickly without any afterthought in order to cover somebody else's tracks? But now we have to get into one of the angles that I find to be the most damning, and that's the discussion surrounding the rifle itself. The murder weapon, a Mouser 3006 bolt-action rifle, a weapon typically used by big game hunters or even back in the day used by soldiers in war, is the real anchor of the FBI's physical evidence. It's the literal smoking gun. Yet, its handling in the narrative seems to defy reality. So, according to the official story, as you probably know by now, after shooting Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson fled the scene and according to the FBI almost immediately ended up in a nearby wooded area very close to where the shooting happened, where he, for some reason, fully reassembled the rifle and then just left it there. He left the fully reassembled rifle in the woods along with those engraved bullet casings and just it just so happened that he left a towel with his DNA on it. The official story states that Tyler Robinson assembled the rifle on the roof, then disassembled it and stuffed the pieces of the rifle into his backpack. The barrel detached, stock separated, all nestled in that small backpack alongside his change of clothing before hopping off the roof for transport. But the reasoning isn't clear at all as to why Tyler Robinson, when attempting to flee the scene of the world's most high-profile crime that day, would then take the time to reassemble the rifle fully when he was out in the woods and then leave it somewhere where it could be easily found and seen and photographed by FBI agents who just so happened to be looking for it. This to me seems to be a fabrication of some sort by the FBI or someone else. I mean, think about it. If the rifle was still disassembled, it would have been nearly impossible for agents to find it in the middle of a dense wooded area. However, I mean, just imagine they're looking. How would they find a disassembled little chunk of metal in the middle of a wooded area? There's no way even if you're walking doing a ground search, it would be much harder to find pieces and parts of a broken down gun that he could have Tyler could have easily hid anywhere in the wooded area. However, the fact that the large gun, big gun, was fully assembled, in my opinion, made it much easier for the FBI to find, if that makes sense. Like, I'm not saying that in my opinion, they actually found it. Like, oh, we're searching. Look at here's a gun. I think it was more like in my opinion, let's put this here and uh act like we found it. If that makes sense. And it's made me question, and I want you to ask yourself this question. What a guy like Tyler Robinson, think about it. What a guy like Tyler Robinson, who up until this point had perfectly executed the assassination, perfectly obscured his identity, and had pulled off a near perfect escape from the crime scene undetected, and had pre-planned all of this for a long period of time. Would he really take the extra time to stop in the woods in the midst of his escape, reassemble, fully reassemble the rifle, and then leave it practically gift wrapped with a DNA stained towel in a nearby wooded area for federal agents to just so happen to find? It makes truly no sense. And then there's the screwdriver. Now, according to the FBI and official reporting, while he was on the roof, Tyler Robinson used a screwdriver that he brought with him to meticulously reassemble the rifle, threading pins and torquing screws under the scorching midday sun. Remember, when he went up to the roof, according to the FBI, Robinson carried with him that backpack full of gun parts, then put it together while he was up there. Then he took the shot and somehow took the rifle apart, changed the clothes, and stored all that in his backpack in somewhere from 15 to 30 seconds. The screwdriver though that Tyler used to assemble and disassemble the rifle, according to FBI director Cash Patel in a statement on September 11th, that screwdriver was later recovered from the rooftop itself. And serendipitously for the FBI, the screwdriver was found with Tyler Robinson's DNA on it. But this makes no sense. Remember, after fleeing the scene and according to the FBI, immediately after carrying out the shooting, Tyler Robinson then heads to a wooded area and fully reassembles the rifle in the woods. But how would he do this without a screwdriver? If he left the screwdriver that he used to put the gun together and break it down up on the roof, if he left it there and made the escape without the screwdriver, well, what happened? Did a screwdriver magically appear in his backpack? Could he have possibly brought a second screwdriver with him? Did he really plan that far ahead? I mean, it's known that he left his trusty screwdriver, which once again conveniently had his DNA on it, on the rooftop, but there was no screwdriver left on scene when they found his rifle. This also begs the question, if Tyler really did take the time to assemble this rifle in the woods, to throw some ammunition, some carved ammunition on the ground, and even conveniently took the time to leave a DNA covered towel near all of this. Why would Tyler Robinson not just leave the screwdriver that he used to assemble the gun in the woods there with all that stuff, too? I mean, think about it. He had already taken everything out of his backpack, like the carved casings and whatever this towel is, wherever this towel came from, and the gun. And he already left his other screwdriver, if we're going with the two screwdrivers theory, on the rooftop. And since he was, and like I said, since he was using it to reassemble the gun in the woods, we can assume that he would have grabbed that second screwdriver from his backpack in order to use it to build the gun again. But why wouldn't he just leave it there? Why not just throw it on the ground with his other extremely and conveniently incriminating items? I mean, it just makes no sense. If he actually had a screwdriver in his hand and he's just throwing all this stuff down, why wouldn't he just throw the screwdriver down, too? Why wouldn't he pack up the bullets? Why Why wouldn't he pack up the towel if he's going to take the time to pack up the screwdriver? And why would he not just throw the screwdriver on the ground? I mean, it just makes no sense. And it is important to note that to date the FBI has not claimed that they have located another screwdriver. They haven't even explained this inconsistency in the official story. They've made no comment on it. I think they know that people are pointing this out, but they haven't said anything. I think that they just are realizing that they up the story. Now, people online have spent hours analyzing footage of the shooting, the footage of the killing itself, and the footage of the alleged perpetrator on the roof. And many have pointed out that after viewing the footage, when looking at Tyler Robinson's rooftop sprint, they see no telltale bulge of a slung rifle, just a light backpack over his shoulder. He doesn't appear to be holding a rifle on his person, and he doesn't appear to have a rifle in his pants or under his clothing, as it definitely would have been visible in that footage, meaning he had to have broken down the rifle. Or maybe the rifle was left on the roof and later confiscated and planted by the FBI. I don't know. That's just a theory. One person online even posted a photo for comparison showing what a 306 crammed into loose jeans would look like. And it's very noticeable. And this image almost underscores the absurdity of all of these claims. Hiding an entire rifle in skinny jeans or a tiny backpack. It's just unbelievable to me that he would have been able to get the rifle off of the roof without being noticed unless it was either in his backpack or he didn't even have it on his person. Then there's the fact that in all the announcements that Cash Patel made with the DNA on the towel and the screwdriver, it was not announced that there was any DNA found on the rifle. Yeah, there's there's no DNA on the rifle. Instead, the DNA was found on that towel. random ass towel in the woods and the screwdriver, which is again incredibly bizarre. How could Tyler Robinson's DNA have been found on a towel and a screwdriver, but nowhere on the gun itself? Think about that. To build the gun, he would have been sweating all over the gun. He would have screwed it all in. He would have been touching all the parts over and over again. and he would have carried it with him, been touching it at his home, probably been shooting it before the shooting, training. If he did that, his DNA would have been all over that thing. But apparently, they didn't find any DNA on the gun itself. Recently, Newsweek reported on September 21st that Cash Patel is currently questioning potential accompllices of Tyler Robinson's, hinting at some sort of weapon handover scenario where an accomplice of Tyler may have taken it from him, reassembled it, which makes no sense still, and dumped it in the woods or something like that. Once again though, absolutely none of this makes sense when you actually look at it beyond the surface level. It's great to have a little easy explanation that says, "Yeah, yeah, this is what happened and I'm just going to believe it." But when you poke and prod at these things, they just fall apart. Cash Patel's broader conduct during this investigation has also invited scorn from both parties, Republicans and Democrats, as NBC News detailed in an article posted on September 15th. For example, Cash Patel, the leader of the FBI, was posting in real time on X throughout the rapidly unfolding investigation, speculating and taking guesses about the shooter's motives before a single piece of evidence materialized. Critics, including former DOJ officials, have publicly argued that these actions performed by Cash Patel only serve to prejudice the case, echoing whispers of the Epstein coverup. Forums like r/true crime discussion have overflowed with timelines charting these missteps. Now fully fleshed out, the rifle saga reveals not only what seemed to be mechanical impossibilities, but also a deep institutional hubris where evidence is forced and bent to fit an inventive narrative or story that was dreamt up before a shooter was even in custody. But things get even weirder and weirder as we go down the rabbit hole. Now, I initially I was like, "Yeah, there's some weird things about this." But one of the things that kind of incentivized me to make this video was a rabbit hole I fell down on Tik Tok a few nights ago um and on YouTube where I've been watching these people these guys who run um like gun weapon YouTube channels, hunting YouTube channels, hunting Tik Toks, these guys that have channels where they use guns frequently and they have a lot of knowledge about weaponry and they've all been saying the 30 6 that if that was really fired at Charlie Kirk from that distance, it would have absolutely blown him away and the the damage would have been much greater than what we saw with the footage. If you've seen that clip of the actual wound appearing on Charlie Kirk's neck, every person that I've seen that has had actual experience with these guns, whether through hunting or just recreational shooting, has said, "Yeah, he should have been way more [ __ ] up by that shot." And you see, to me, the ballistic enigma of the wound on Charlie Kirk's neck constitutes the cover story's most egregious affront to science. A miracle that physicists and surgeons alike have stated is complete and utter, to be frank, [ __ ] This essentially is the FBI's core claim. A 3006 slug screaming through the air at 2700 to 3,000 feet per second fired from a distance of approximately 150 to 200 yd strikes Charlie Kirk's neck soft tissue approximate to the corateed artery piercing his skin with a modest entry wound but no visible exit wound. The round lodging harmlessly within Kirk's neck where it came to a halt. Still frames from the viral footage. Charlie Kirk, mid gesture after being shot with his head snapping backwards, according to some eagle-eyed firearms experts, appears to show a bullet wound similar to a wound that most likely would have come from a 22 caliber rifle, not the cavernous, extremely gruesome trauma that would be expected from a weapon and round designed for shooting and killing elk at twice the distance. To put this in layman's terms, the shot itself, if this round was really fired from that exact spot by Tyler Robinson and really fired from that exact rifle, should have, according to many experts, done a lot more damage. I mean, I've seen a video where a guy describes how they use this gun and rounds like this specifically to hunt larger game like elk. And let's and he explained it on his video, but let me explain it to you here. Let's think about this for a second. Elk have extremely thick and heavy bones. Their bones, in fact, are one and a half to two times thicker than human bones. After all, their frames typically have to support anywhere from 600 to,200 lb of weight. But if a Mouser 300 6 boltaction rifle is fired at an elk from around the same distance that Charlie Kirk was shot at, according to what I've seen people say online, the elk's bones will completely shatter. I'm talking the bones practically disintegrate. Not like a little crack. The bones are evaporated inside of the elk's body. The Mouser 300 6 boltaction rifle is in fact a rifle designed for power and for deadliness. All you have to do is look at some of the videos that people have posted online after the shooting replicating the exact shot taken at Charlie Kirk taken from approximately the same distance using the same rifle. And you can see almost immediately that if he really was shot with that weapon, the damage should have been so much greater. Just take a look at these clips. >> So today on Dual Liberty Firearms, we're going to be showing you what a 30 6 does to a ballistics gel skull. So we have a realistic human head here made with ballistics gelatin and a resin skull. And it's got a filling in there. So hopefully you'll be able to see what happens. All right. So, now we're going to throw it in about a 10% slow-mo for you. This is going to look super cool. Now, what happened was when the 300 6 projectile hit the head, I had predicted it would go through the front side and just blow a big hole in the backside. But what actually happened was the large projectile of the 300 6 went through the skull and impacted all the liquid blood that I had on the inside. All right, Will's going to try some 30 odd six in a rifle to see what it does. Full metal jacket. 30 odd six. Yeah. Wow. What happened there? >> Did that come in backwards? It tumbled. Yeah, it did. [Applause] This is a Winchester Model 70 chambered in 30 yacht 6. >> Ready? [Laughter] >> Right out the back. >> Yeah. >> Completely unstopped. Straight through. >> Filled the whole frame. >> You can see the bullet go straight through. >> I didn't care. The watermelon didn't know it was shot until there was already an exit wound. >> Dude, that blew the 2x4 in half. That was the coolest part. [Applause] >> That 2x4 is cool. >> That's almost the entire bullet there. Oh, wait. Is that >> the steel core? >> Steel core. And that's copper. >> Oh, I bet it is. Yeah. Good eye. That is wild. It still barely slowed down. I feel like >> it's crazy how much it diverted that steel core up. >> Yeah. >> Looking up this spine coming out of the back. >> It demonstrates again just how much bigger exit wounds are than entrance wounds. >> Welcome back to Ballistics Nation. Today we're taking the 200yd shot. But in today's video, we wanted to take a look at just how difficult it is to hit a shot from 200 yards, especially on a roof. [Music] >> Well, so I definitely missed, >> which is kind of the point I was trying to make. Uh there's so many things that come into factor here. There's there's a lot of things that come into play and you would just have to be a phenomenal marksman to have one shot with a bunch of people around. We're going to go ahead and shoot a couple more rounds down range. See if we can get lucky and hit the target. There is a lot of scopes on the market, right? Some are for close range, some are for far range, some are red dots, some are for super long range, what have you. So, you're going to have to plan out in advance what's a good scope for 200 y at that distance. You have to know how to make certain adjustments with the windage and the elevation changes, how far to be zoomed in and zoomed out on the scope. So, someone to make this shot would really have to know what they were doing. Definitely missed again, unfortunately. But honestly, that kind of goes to show you that with the setup that we did, we shot this gun at 50 yards and then 100 yards and we were right on a little bit low. So, obviously making those adjustments for this distance, and I still can't even hit that. And I bet when we go look down there, I'm going to be kind of all over the place, right? Because you have to think about this. I had to climb up a ladder to get up here. It's hot. Kind of zipping up and down. I'm a little stressed. I've got to film myself. So, like all those things you have to think about when you're going to take a shot. So, for somebody to be able to hop on a roof in the hot sun and lower their heart rate down, right? Because every time you go to breathe through the scope, right, everything's everything's connected. So basically when I breathe the gun is going to move slightly, right? Might not make a difference this close, but you know, extend that movement 100 200 yards down range and you're going to be off by, you know, a huge margin. So again, you got to know how to control your breath. You got to know what scope to use. You got to know what bullets to use, what gun is the right power. Yeah. Well, I did a lot better than I thought I was going to do from that distance away. Couple things to think about. This is a stationary target. Think about trying to hit a target that's moving around unpredictably. Think about that. Also, you got to think about how I missed off to the right. Because when I'm shooting, I'm pulling my trigger finger and the gun's jerking to the right. I would have to train for years to be able to hit a shot this precise consistently at 200 y. All right, for the next part of this theory or conspiracy theories that are floating about, Charlie stood about 6'5. You take his body mass, if it was proportional, his neck would have been about 5 and a half, maybe 575 in diameter, giving him a circumference of maybe anywhere between 15 to 17 in of his neck. So, what we're going to do is we're going to simulate that with a pork neck. So, we have pretty hefty pork neck here. Solid bone, couple inches of meat. We're going to see if we can get a bullet to stop in it at 100. And this time, I'm pushing out. I'm going to go to 175 m. And we're going to see if we can hit this right square in center and get a 150 grain bullet to stop. Now remember, it's a corlock. It is designed to stop. That's what it's designed to do. But it's not designed to stop here on just ballistics gel alone. The 150 grain corlock from a 30 6 is going to have almost 24 in of penetration. There we go. That's our close approximation to a deer neck. Well, up to Charlie's neck. So, and again for size reference, see what we got. On the day that he was shot, Charlie Kirk was not wearing body armor, a fact that has been corroborated by timeline reconstructions, placing Charlie Kirk in a t-shirt that day without a vest, which implies that the round fired at Charlie that day would have had a direct soft tissue impact. Now, if this impact was applied to Charlie Kirk's slender frame, this round fired from this rifle, according to the official story, should have absolutely, not to be too graphic, but it should have eviscerated his vertebrae, his spinal cord. It should have severed multiple arteries and caused a hemorrhagic cascade. And it should have painted the tent's canvas rear, the material behind Charlie Kirk, with a large bloody red arterial spray. And it also at the same time would have endangered the cluster of aids and guests that sat just a few feet away from Charlie when he was shot. Instead though, as you can see in the footage, there's no blood. There's zero blood that sprays out behind Charlie. In fact, it's been claimed now that there was never even an exit wound at all. It just gets even more unbelievable by the day. So on September 20th, a close friend of Charlie's and one of the most powerful people at TurningPoint USA, Charlie's organization, a man named Andrew Kulvet, posted the following on X, saying, quote, I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I'm usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know. I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital. He said the bullet quote absolutely should have gone through, which is very, very normal for a high-powered, high velocity round. I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc. End quote. But it didn't go through. Charlie's body stopped it. I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied, quote, "It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed. His bone was so healthy, and the density was so, so impressive that he's like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him, too." End quote. In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable, miraculous. End quote. And this is, I know I keep saying it, but this is incredibly bizarre. I mean, you're actually claiming now. Think of those videos that I just showed you. Think about all the experienced hunters that I've showed you in this video and weapons experts talking about how damn powerful a 3006 boltaction rifle is. Think of how in, you know, in relativity how close the shooter was to Charlie Kirk. This wasn't like an extremely far shot. He was pretty close to him. And just think of what it actually looks like when you fire rounds from this gun at targets. You've seen those videos. Now you have a guy from Turning Point claiming that it was literally some sort of heaven-sent miracle that the bullet stopped in his neck, which I mean, I'm sorry, but it's just physically impossible. A bullet fired from a gun of that caliber, of that size, would have destroyed his neck. It would have blown blown a hole through him. It would have shattered and destroyed vertebrae and and other parts of Charlie's neck and body. And come on guys, clearly with a with a weapon that powerful, we would have seen an exit wound if that really I believe was the actual weapon. I could be wrong about all this. I'm just reporting on what all these other people are saying and and you know, questioning the narrative with it. It makes no sense whatsoever that the bullet would just stop on his neck and it wouldn't even exit his neck if it's going 2700 to 3,000 yards feet per second. I don't think I don't think you really can grasp how powerful and and really fast that is. But I mean, the inconsistency and the thing that just makes no sense about the shooting whatsoever that all these people are saying this seems like [ __ ] and this official story makes no sense. Now that all these people started questioning all this stuff and making videos about it online and talking about it, Turning Point USA, one of the main guys, comes out and says, you know, it seems like [ __ ] It seems incredibly fake and it seems like it's totally different weapon, but don't worry, it was a miracle. This was an actual This was a divine miracle. And I'm not making fun of religious people. I believe in miracles. I've been to places where miracles have happened. I was just in Italy at multiple places where miracles have happened. I was filming for an upcoming video uh that's going to be going on my other channel. I walked through the Virgin Mary's water at a spring that she in a miracle created. Um I gathered holy water from a miracle well that flows with water in in the center of Rome. I just I've read so much about miracles and I understand and I do believe in them, but this to me seems like a very very easy way to try to explain a very core fact of the FBI's official story that makes no sense. It's like an easy get out of jail free card. I mean, what is it? Is it more likely that Charlie Kirk experienced a miracle when he was shot in the neck or that an entirely different weapon was used? Also, no autopsy report or anything like that has been released so far. And reportedly, the coroner seems to be stonewalling efforts to get that report released, which has left a void where science and evidence should illuminate. Now, I also saw another YouTuber when I was watching a video about Charlie Kirk's assassination and the theories behind it. I saw him talk about AAM's razor, and I think that that concept is really preient and relevant here. Essentially, AAM's razor is a simple idea used to figure out the best explanation for something. It says that when you have a few possible explanations for a situation, the simplest one, the one that makes the fewest assumptions or adds the least complexity, is usually the right one. Now, imagine you're trying to solve a puzzle and you have two solutions. One solution that needs just a few pieces to fit perfectly and another solution that requires a bunch of extra pieces and complicated steps. AAM's razor suggests picking the simpler solution because it's more likely to be correct as it doesn't rely on unnecessary guesses or complications. This principle is often used in science, problem solving, and even everyday life to avoid overthinking things. For example, if your car won't start, it's probably just a dead battery rather than some sort of rare, complex engine failure because the battery explanation is simpler and more common. However, AAM's Razer isn't a strict rule. It's just a guideline. Sometimes, some sometimes the more complicated explanation is true, but by starting with the simplest one that helps you focus on what's most likely without getting lost in wild theories or extra details. So, apply that principle here. Either Tyler Robinson is some form of a psy and this assassination was set up by somebody or some government or some group and the cover up was very very sloppy or Tyler Robinson did do this but he had no prior history. He had no real motivation. He confessed to everything over the texts that we're going to cover in a second. He changed his clothing and disassembled the gun in 15 to 30 seconds. He then reassembled the rifle in the woods to leave it as evidence with a DNA soaked towel. He also confessed and yet he's not talking about it. The official story is much more complicated than this other story, AAM's razor. Same thing with Charlie Kirk's wound. Was it really a miracle? And the doctors can't explain it and he was hit at the perfect angle and something stopped the bullet in his body because the gun would have completely destroyed his neck and it was a complete this and that and that or was it just a different weapon that was used? I'll let you think on that one. We also can't forget about the guy who claimed immediately after the shooting that he was the shooter. The postshot chaos right after Charlie Kirk was shot literally in my opinion unfolded almost like a conspiracy script with immediate loud and visible distractions and false positives piling quickly. For example, right after the shooting occurred, there was an elderly man seen and heard running around the scene screaming out, "I did it." and trying to take credit for Charlie Kirk's killing. Obviously, this guy was immediately tackled and arrested and taken in by the police, even though it was later determined that he had nothing to do with the shooting. But who was this guy? Well, the elderly attendee was later identified as local retiree and semi famousamous Utah political figure George Zinn. Now, it's known that George Zinn is innocent and obviously that he didn't carry out the shooting. But who exactly is George Zinn? Well, George Zinn is a 71-year-old Utah political gadfly known for his decadesl long presence at Republican events, protests, and even cultural gatherings like the Sundance Film Festival. This guy is like a pretty well-known political figure in the Utah political scene who just pops up at all these notable events and protests and notable times when notable things are happening. It's like George Zinn is always there. It's like where's Waldo type of thing. Where's George Zinn? And interestingly, George Zinn is known for frequently disrupting proceedings with his libertarianleaning conservative views. It is interesting, though. So, let's imagine that there really was something weird going on that day, but something bigger, darker was really