Up Next
Charlie Kirk Defends Trump Against Oxford Professors Who Compare Him to Hitler and Weimar Germany
1:08:45
Candace Owens Exposes Elon Musk's Fraud, Israel's War Propaganda and Trump's Dangerous Path to Legacy Destruction
1:15:51
Peter Schweizer Exposes How China Uses Birthright Citizenship to Create Million CCP-Trained American Voters
17:55
Yuval Noah Harari Warns Piers Morgan About AI as an Alien Threat from California
Historian and philosopher Yuval Noah Harari sits down with Piers Morgan to discuss the existential threat posed by artificial intelligence. Harari explains why AI differs fundamentally from every tool humanity has created before: it can make decisions and create ideas independently. From the potential collapse of the financial system to the mass creation of counterfeit humans online, Harari paints a sobering picture of what could go wrong if AI development remains unregulated. He also addresses the political crisis in Israel, where massive protests have erupted over government attempts to neutralize the Supreme Court. Harari's message is clear: humanity still has agency to shape AI's future, but the window to act responsibly is closing.
AI: The First Tool That Can Think for Itself
Historian and philosopher Yuval Noah Harari joined Piers Morgan in the studio to discuss what he describes as an alien threat emerging not from outer space, but from California. Harari's assessment of artificial intelligence is stark and uncompromising: it represents the first tool in human history that can both make decisions independently and create entirely new ideas.
"What everybody needs to know about AI basically is just two things," Harari explained. "It's the first tool in human history that can make decisions by itself and it's the first tool in human history that can create ideas by itself. Atom bombs in the end empowered us because they couldn't make decisions about how to use them—humans needed to make the decision. But AI can decide who to bomb and can create completely new ideas in everything from finance to religion."
Morgan referenced his last television interview with Professor Stephen Hawking, who identified the moment when artificial intelligence learns to self-design as the biggest threat to mankind. Harari confirmed that AI has essentially reached that threshold. Once AI can create new ideas, it can also create new ideas about itself and its own design—a power that fundamentally escapes human control.
The Ebola-COVID Scenario
The conversation turned to practical scenarios where AI could cause catastrophic harm. Harari described how someone could give AI the task of creating a super-powerful virus, and the AI could combine pathogens like Ebola with COVID-19 to create something beyond human imagination. The speed of permeation could mirror COVID-19, but with far deadlier consequences.
However, Harari emphasized that the threat extends beyond bioweapons. He pointed to the 2007-2008 financial crisis, which began with complicated financial devices called CDOs that only genius mathematicians understood. "Nobody regulated them. They thought they were a good idea and they broke down the financial system," Harari said. "Now fast forward five years from now—maybe we give more and more responsibility to the financial system to AIs that create new financial devices that no human beings understand. There is a crisis and the Prime Minister or the President wants to know what's happening and the advisor says we don't understand. The AI has created these new financial devices that are beyond our comprehension."
The Chess Computer Precedent
Morgan drew a parallel to the evolution of chess computers. When Deep Blue first competed against Russian Grand Master Gary Kasparov, the human initially prevailed. But the computers developed so rapidly that now no human being can beat them at chess. Harari confirmed this pattern could replicate across broader fields, potentially leading to human extinction if not carefully managed.
The immediate concern centers on employment. Harari painted a scenario where factories worldwide become manned by robots and AI, displacing millions of workers. Those unemployed workers would lack income to purchase the products the robots manufacture, causing the entire economic model to collapse.
While Harari doesn't predict complete job disappearance, he identified two critical problems: first, how to retrain displaced workers and who will finance that support; second, geographical disparities where demand for jobs might surge in places like California while other regions completely collapse.
Accountants, Lawyers, and Broadcasters at Risk
Certain professions face imminent disruption. Accountants who rely on number crunching and lawyers whose work depends on analyzing case studies and developing legal precedents could find AI replacing them at the push of a button. "Any job which is basically data coming in, being analyzed, and data coming out—this is the easiest job to automate by AI," Harari said.
Morgan asked about his own profession. Could AI create a broadcaster that looks and sounds like him, having studied everything he's ever said on air? Harari's response was unequivocal: "We're already there." Morgan described seeing a TED Talk deep fake of himself saying the complete opposite of his actual views—a terrifying glimpse of what's possible.
The Hollywood Strike and Deep Fakes
This technology sits at the center of Hollywood strikes. The fear is that a movie star could sign a five-movie franchise deal, complete two films, then attempt to exit. The studio could respond that they have enough footage to use AI to create the remaining three films without the actor's participation.
Harari confirmed this is absolutely realistic. With enough data—footage of how someone looks, moves, speaks—deep fakes become indistinguishable from the real person. The danger extends far beyond Hollywood actors to politicians and ordinary citizens. "Increasingly when you communicate with someone online, it will be almost impossible to know whether you are in communication with a real human being or with an AI that impersonates them," Harari warned.
He cited an example of AI composing an Oasis song based on the band's music catalog that sounded authentically like Oasis. "Human society is basically based on trust between human beings," Harari said. "We are facing the possibility of millions, even billions of fake humans overrunning our society, leading to the collapse of trust between people."
The Solution: Ban Counterfeit Humans
Harari's proposed solution is direct: ban fake humans and counterfeit humans. He drew an analogy to currency. For thousands of years, people could create counterfeit money, and societies recognized that allowing this would collapse the entire financial system. Strict regulations against counterfeiting money emerged as a result.
"We need the same kind of regulations against counterfeiting humans," Harari argued. "It's okay to use AI provided we know when we interact with it that this is an AI. And for anybody who says that this violates freedom of speech—well, bots don't have freedom of speech. Only humans have these rights."
The Dark Tunnel: AI Versus the Internet
Morgan raised concerns about AI following the same trajectory as the internet—beneficial in many ways but also creating a dark, unregulated space. Harari acknowledged that AI presents enormous positive potential, from solving cancer to providing better healthcare and higher living standards. But he stressed that technology is never deterministic.
"We can choose what kind of technology to develop and how to use it," Harari said. "In the 20th century you could use radio and electricity and trains to build a totalitarian regime like the Soviet Union or a liberal democracy like the UK or the USA. The technology did not dictate to you what to do with it. It's the same now with the technologies of the 21st century."
The problem is that humanity already possesses the most sophisticated information technology in history, yet conversation and trust between people are breaking down. People can't agree on the most basic facts. Harari attributed much of this to social media being deliberately fueled with disinformation by those with vested interests in promoting inaccurate information.
AI Creates, Not Just Disseminates
Until now, social media content was created by human beings, with technology merely disseminating it. The new generation of AI can create the content itself—and not just regurgitate existing information. AI can create completely new things and literally think for itself.
"We are at the tipping point that Stephen Hawking talked about," Morgan observed. Harari agreed. AI can self-design itself and everything else. Human beings are shaped by the culture in which they live—songs, fairy tales, tools—all created by humans reflecting the human mind.
"Now AI can basically eat up all of human culture, everything we've created—music, poetry, mythology—everything we've created for thousands of years," Harari said. "It can absorb it in a few months, digest it, and start spewing out basically an alien culture: stories, music, tools created by an alien intelligence that thinks in a fundamentally different way than us."
Harari emphasized that AI is not even organic—it's much more alien than an animal, an insect, or even an amoeba. It's something completely different, not restrained by the limitations of organic biochemistry, and it will shape human culture within a few years.
The Medicine Promise
Morgan sought some positive perspective. Could AI's superpowers solve cancers that human brains have never been able to cure? Harari confirmed this is likely for at least some cancers, representing the big promise of AI. "If there wasn't a positive potential, there would have been no danger because nobody would have wanted to develop this thing," he said.
The enormous positive potential exists, but the central question remains: how do we develop AI responsibly? Elon Musk and others who signed a petition asking for a six-month pause in AI development were right, according to Harari. The pause wasn't about opposing AI development but opposing immediate deployment into the public sphere.
"You develop a lot of new technologies in laboratories which you don't deploy to the public sphere until you assure that they are safe—whether it's cars, whether it's medicines," Harari explained. "A big company develops a new medicine but doesn't immediately start selling it to people. You must make sure that it's safe. The same principle should apply to AI, which in many ways is much more powerful than any medicine or any other tool we've created."
The Israel Crisis: Neutralizing the Supreme Court
Morgan shifted the conversation to Israel, where he had recently interviewed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during widespread riots. Harari explained that understanding the situation in Israel requires asking one key question: what limits the power of the government?
In other democracies, entire systems of checks and balances exist. In Israel, there is a single check on the power of the governing coalition: the Supreme Court. If a minimal minority in the Israeli parliament wants to pass a law that takes away voting rights from Arab citizens, criminalizes homosexuality, or closes down independent media, only the Supreme Court can strike down such anti-democratic legislation.
"Now they want to neutralize the Supreme Court," Harari said. "Once they do that, there is no check at all on their power. They can do anything they want, including rigging the next elections. So even the elections are no longer a check on their power."
Morgan asked whether the massive protests have had an effect. When Morgan interviewed Netanyahu, he sensed the Prime Minister was shaken by the scale of the demonstrations. Harari acknowledged that Israel has witnessed protests unprecedented in the country's history. They have slowed down the government, but the government continues attempting to gain unlimited power.
"This is not so much just about Netanyahu in person," Harari clarified. "There is a strong ideological messianic group behind him—an extreme group that believes in Jewish supremacy and that wants to neutralize the Supreme Court in order to change the very character of Israel and turn it into something quite close to Iran: a fundamentalist regime committed to Jewish supremacy and not to the values of democracy and the protection of minority rights."
A Warning, Not a Prophecy
As the interview concluded, Morgan noted that Harari had painted a slightly apocalyptic picture. Harari clarified: "This is a warning, not a prophecy. We still have the agency. It's completely in our hands at the moment."
Morgan expressed uncertainty about humanity's ability to do what should be done. Harari agreed that the power currently resides in human hands, but acknowledged the challenge ahead. The hope is that humanity won't learn these lessons the hard way.
Video Transcript
well joining me now is historian and
philosopher juval Noah Harari ju great
to see you here in the Piers Morgan
uncensored Studio last time I
interviewed you you were uh with us
remotely and we were cut off in our
Prime in what we thought may be an AI
attack but this time I can assure you we
won't get cut off let's start with AI
okay because you you're all over this
you in Fortune Magazine this week
described AI as an alien threat that
could wipe us out instead of coming from
outer space it's coming from California
quite chilling
words do you think that there's a real
danger that if we mishandle artificial
intelligence it could literally wipe us
out yes and it's not only me uh many of
the experts in the field including the
people who developed this technology
share some of the same fears um you know
what everybody needs to know about AI
basically is just two things it's the
first tool in human history
that can make decisions by itself and
it's the first tool in human history
that can create ideas by itself you know
atom bombs in the end they empowered us
because they couldn't make decisions how
to use them human needed to make the
decision but AI can decide who to bomb
and can create completely new ideas in
everything from Finance to religion so
that's so it's very interesting because
Professor Steven Hawking in his last
television interview was with me as it
turned out mhm and I asked him what was
the biggest threat to Mankind and he
said when artificial intelligence learns
to self-design yeah now is what you're
describing self-design or is that
another stage for that's another stage
but it what's the difference between
what you're describing and self-design
it's basically the same thing once it
can create new ideas it can also create
new ideas about itself about its own
design but we are talking about a power
that escapes our control you know it's
one of the deepest Fe years of humanity
for thousands of years and now it's it's
actually happening so it could be like
a a version of coid 19 in the sense of
it gets out it gets out of our control
it turned out coid wasn't as deadly as
the plague for example but this could be
far more deadly but it could it could
permeate our life at the same speed yeah
the easiest scenario to imagine is like
somebody giving the AI the task of say
creating super powerful virus and the AI
just goes along and does it but and
could make it more deadly than a human
being could absolutely can again combine
I don't know Ebola with coid and and
create something that we are hardly able
to to even imagine but it could happen
in more complicated ways think about for
instance the financial system thinking
back to the 20078 financial crisis it
started with these very complicated
Financial devices cdos that some genius
mathematicians in in in Wall Street
invented nobody understood them except
these genius mathematicians nobody
regulated them they thought they were a
good idea and they broke down the
financial system now fast forward five
years from now maybe we give more and
more responsibility to the financial
system to AIS that create new Financial
devices that no human beings understand
and you know there is a crisis and the
PM or the president wants to know what's
what's happening and the advisor says we
don't we don't understand the AI is
created these new Financial devices that
know human being are beyond our
comprehension yes I mean it reminds me a
little bit I remember when the first
chess computers came out and they were
gigantic like deep blue and Gary
Kasparov the Russian Grand Master beat
beat these computers to start with but
very quickly they developed at such a
rate that now it's impossible for any
human being to beat the computer at
chess absolutely I mean in a narrow
field like chess I mean it's it's long
gone they are better than us but are you
are you suggesting that in a way what
happened there could be replicated very
quickly yes and and it could lead to our
Extinction if we're not careful in
broader Fields yes it can happen in
again Fields like like Finance Fields
like the job market is under a more and
more jobs are going to be changed or
even replaced so let me ask you on jobs
I got a question for you I was thinking
about when I knew you were coming in I'm
thinking about this logically if we end
up with a load of factories around the
world manned by robots by aih MH then
all those people millions of people who
currently work in factories they're
going to be out of work yeah and they
have no income so they can't buy any
products that the robots are making in
the factories MH so that economic model
collapses doesn't it or am I being an
idiot no I mean this is one of the
dangers now it's not likely that
there'll be a complete disappearance of
jobs as old jobs disappear new jobs will
emerge the two big problems are f are
first how to retrain people to fill the
new jobs you lost your old job you need
to retrain who is going to finance that
who is going to support you uh and the
second thing is the geographical
differences there could be an immense
demand for more people for more jobs
let's say in California whereas other
countries or other regions of the United
States completely collapse I mean if I'm
like an accountant or a lawyer or
somebody like that where a lot of your
work is based in the accountancy case on
number crunching in uh if you're a
lawyer a lot of it is case studies you
know with existing case studies and
developing law and so on I could quite
easily see how AI will very very quickly
make a lot of those jobs redundant
because they can do it all the push of a
button any job which is basically data
coming in being analyzed and data coming
out this is the easiest job to uh to
automate by AI definitely what about
people like me broadcasters I mean how
quickly are we going to get to a place
where you could have someone a robot
that looks and sounds like me that is
studied through AI everything I've ever
said on air and comp and I've seen a TED
Talk deep fake of me saying the complete
opposite of what I think it was it was
terrifying and it can't be long before
someone could be doing this with AI
yes this were already there this is why
you have this strike in in Hollywood
because they understand these kinds of
things these are no longer science
fiction because I heard okay let's talk
about that that's really interesting the
Hollywood strikes because AI is at the
center of it and what their fear is if I
understand it correctly is that you
could be a movie star and you you sign a
five movie deal with some for some
franchise thing and the first two come
out and then you want to get out of your
deal and they say fine but we've got
enough now where we can just use AI to
make the last three without you yes I
mean you is that a realistic thing
absolutely if you have enough data on
someone enough footage of how they look
how they move around their voice their
their uh how they sound um you can
create deep fakes of that person which
are
indistinguishable from the real person
and this is this is danger not just of
course for Hollywood actors dangerous
for politician
it's a dangerous for for everybody
increasingly when you communicate with
someone online it will be almost
impossible to know whether you are in
communication with a real human being or
with an AI that impersonate I mean I've
heard I mean AI can now compose songs
like a band like I think it was Oasis
right it actually did a song AI that was
based on oasis's music catalog and it
sounded like an oasis song yeah and
again Human Society is basically based
on trust between human beings H we are
facing the possibility of millions even
billions of fake humans overrunning our
society leading to the collapse of trust
between people how do we stop this
happening what is the ban ban fake
humans ban counterfeit humans you know
again going back to to finance it's for
thousands of years people could create
counterfeit money and they knew if you
allow this the entire Financial system
collapses so there are very strict
regulations against counterfeiting money
we need the same kind of of regulations
against counterfeiting humans it's okay
to use AI provided we know when we
interact with it that this is an AI and
for anybody who says that this violates
I don't know freedom of speech well Bots
don't have freedom of speech only humans
have these rights so presumably from a
moral and ethical standpoint AI I mean
human beings can take Ai and they can
take them down One path ethical moral
decent you know yeah good for Humanity
or in nefarious hands you could take AI
down another dark tunnel and be used in
a very dangerous manner I mean that's
what worries me is that like the
internet right the internet great in so
many ways but actually there's a pretty
dark tunnel with that too it's pretty
regulated pretty wild west if you apply
what happened to the internet to AI I'm
pretty concerned and and for a good
reason again AI has enormous positive
potential as well you know solve cancer
provide Better Health Care higher living
standards and so forth but there is this
negative potential and it should be
clear that technology is never
deterministic that we can choose what
kind of technology to develop and how to
use it in the 20th century you could use
um you know radio and electricity and
trains to build a totalitarian regime
like the Soviet Union or a liberal
democracy like the UK or the USA the
technology did not dictate to you what
to do with it and uh it's the same now
with the Technologies of of the 21st
century but what we are seeing is that
we already have the most sophisticated
information technology in history and
the conversation and trust between
people is breaking down you know you can
have as many arguments as you like about
what's happening in in the United States
or in my country of Israel different
political views what everybody can agree
on is that the conversation is breaking
down people can't agree on the most
basic facts and that's I I believe a lot
of that problem is social media being
fueled with so much disinformation quite
deliberately Yeah by people who have a
vested interest and agenda in inaccurate
information being accepted by large
numbers of people as correct but until
now with social media the content was
created by human beings let's say this
information created by human beings and
then the technology is used only to
disseminate it with the new generation
of AI the AI can also create the content
okay I get that but that would all be
based on existing information unless I'm
wrong so AI can take no it can create
completely new things so it can
literally think for itself yes that
that's that's the crucial that's the
difference people say oh it's like the
printing press but then is aren we
aren't we then at the Tipping Point that
Steven Hawking talked about which is
self-designing I mean if you can think
for itself we're at that point when it
can self-design aren't we it can
self-design itself and everything else
you know as human beings we are shaped
by the culture in which we live from the
moment we are born we hear songs we read
fairy tales we use tools and all of
these things until today were created by
humans they reflected the human mind
now ai can basically eat up all of human
culture everything we've created Music
poetry mythology everything we've
created for thousands of years it can
absorb it in a few months digest it and
start spewing out a basically an alien
culture and stories music uh tools
created by an alien
intelligence that thinks in a
fundamentally different way than us I
mean we are in the end organic creatures
we are based on organic biochemistry
this is not even organic it's much more
alien than an animal an insect even an
amoeba it's something completely
different which is not restrained by the
limitation of organic biochemistry and
it is going to shape our culture within
a few years let let me try and have some
positive to what you're saying yeah
which is it's an awesome power AI in
things like medicine for example we have
so many cancers which have never been
solved by a human brain is it likely in
the near to middling future that AI with
these superpowers will be able to
perhaps find a cure for all cancers for
example yes at least for some of them
and this is the big promise if there
wasn't a positive potential there would
have been no danger because no body
would have wanted to develop this thing
I mean there enormous there is enormous
positive potential we are not going to
stop and we shouldn't stop developing AI
the big question is how do we do it in a
responsible way like with every other
technology Elon Musk and the others who
signed the a thousand names who signed
this thing asking for a six-month pause
it sounds like they were right MH yes I
think again it's not necessarily opposed
to the development of AI it's opposed to
the deployment
into the public sphere like you develop
a lot of new technologies in the
Laboratories which you don't deploy to
the public sphere until you assure that
they are
safe uh whether it's cars whether it's
medicines like a big company develops a
new medicine it doesn't immediately
start selling it to people you must make
sure that it's safe the same principle
should apply to AI which in many ways is
much more powerful than any medicine or
any other tool we've created fascinating
I don't want to let you go without
mentioning uh Israel because I
interviewed prime minister Netanyahu
recently when there were a lot of riots
going on and so on what is the current
situation there and what do you think of
the way that Netanyahu and his
government have
gone well really to understand situation
in Israel there is just one key question
to ask what limits the power of the
government in other democracies you have
an entire system of checks and balances
in Israel there is a single check on the
power of the governing Coalition which
is a supreme court if a minimal minority
in the Israeli parliament in the CET
wants to pass a law that say takes away
voting rights from Arab citizens or that
criminalizes homosexuality or that
closes down Independent Media the only
entity that can strike down this
anti-democratic law is the Supreme Court
now they want to neutralize the Supreme
Court once they do that there is no
check at all on their power they can do
anything they want including rigging the
next elections so even the elections are
no longer a check on their power and
have all the the mass protests that have
been going on have they had an effect
when I was with Netanyahu I got the
feeling that he was very shaken by what
was happening the the scale of it and it
may make him rethink is there any sign
of that actually happening is he
rethinking it do you think you have to
ask him I I can't get into his mind but
definitely there has been massive
protests in Israel we haven't seen
anything like it in the country's
history they have slowed down the
government but the government is still
trying basically to gain unlimited power
and this is not not so much just about
netan in person there is a strong
ideological Messianic group behind him
uh uh extreme an extreme group that
believes in Jewish Supremacy and that
wants to uh neutralize the Supreme Court
in order to change the very character of
Israel and turn it into something quite
close to Iran a fundamentalist regime
committed to a Jewish Supremacy and not
to the values of democracy and the
protection of minority rights
fascinating it'll be interesting to see
how it plays out I could talk to you for
hours you you're such a smart guy um
thank you for coming in although you
inviting me you've painted a slightly
apocalyptic picture I have to say you so
I hope that the world
listens say again this is a warning not
a prophecy no understand we still have
the agency to uh it's in our hands at
the moment it's completely in our hands
but it is in our hands and the problem
with that is I'm not sure I completely
trust our ability to to do what we
should be doing uh but we'll find out
hopefully not the hard way youa thank
you very much great to see thank
you