Up Next

RangeDayBro Investigates the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Text Messages, Missing Evidence, and Unanswered Questions

RangeDayBro Investigates the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Text Messages, Missing Evidence, and Unanswered Questions

38:26

Candace Owens Uncovers Eyewitness Testimony FBI Ignored After Charlie Kirk Assassination at UVU Event

Candace Owens Uncovers Eyewitness Testimony FBI Ignored After Charlie Kirk Assassination at UVU Event

1:02:26

Baron Coleman Uncovered Disturbing Google Search Patterns Linked to Charlie Kirk Assassination Using Public Trend Data

Baron Coleman Uncovered Disturbing Google Search Patterns Linked to Charlie Kirk Assassination Using Public Trend Data

1:25:39

ATF Report Shows Bullet That Killed Charlie Kirk Did Not Match Tyler Robinson's Rifle

Categories: Investigation
March 31, 2026

An ATF report reveals the bullet fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk's autopsy produced an inconclusive match to the rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson. The four-page comparison report raises serious questions about the official narrative surrounding Kirk's assassination at Utah Valley University. With no video evidence of Robinson carrying a weapon, questionable ballistic claims, and blocked counterterrorism investigations into potential foreign involvement, the case grows increasingly murky. Joe Kent, former director of national counterterrorism, confirms investigators were stopped from pursuing leads into possible foreign entities, despite Kirk's outspoken opposition to war with Iran and his recent criticism of Israel in the weeks before his death.

ATF Report Casts Doubt on Official Narrative

The news is out, and it changes everything about what we've been told regarding Charlie Kirk's assassination. The bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle allegedly used by the suspect Tyler Robinson. An ATF four-page report on a comparison between a bullet jacket fragment recovered during an autopsy of Charlie Kirk and a rifle recovered by law enforcement came back with one critical result: inconclusive.

For anyone who understands law and proving someone guilty, this is monumental. If there is a rifle that authorities say you used, but the bullet doesn't match, you didn't do it. It can be as simple as that. The technology exists now to match bullet fragments with weapons with extreme accuracy, yet they weren't able to make that connection, or it was inconclusive.

The Miracle Narrative Falls Apart

The original narrative put out was that a surgeon came out and supposedly violated HIPAA laws to tell a TPUSA employee that Charlie's neck was like the Man of Steel—that a .30-06 round stopped in its tracks. Multiple ballistics tests have shown that a .30-06 will go through nearly anything: a full moose, all the bones involved with it. The round is incredibly powerful.

Yet we were told Charlie Kirk's body stopped a bullet that would typically just go through everything, and it was an absolute miracle. Some even went so far as to claim that if you have Christ in your bio but don't believe a miracle was performed by there being no exit wound on Charlie Kirk, you should change your bio.

But here's the reality: the round hit his neck. There's nothing substantial there to stop a .30-06. The laws of ballistics don't change because of a narrative. If God was performing a miracle in this situation, wouldn't He have just made Kirk's skin stop the bullet? It could have hit him and just fallen off. Calling someone dying a miracle doesn't make sense. A true miracle would have been survival, not death under suspicious ballistic circumstances.

The Rifle Discovery Raises More Questions

There is no real imagery or video out there of Tyler Robinson with a gun. The official story claims that Tyler Robinson got on the roof undetected with this gun, put it on the roof, disassembled it, reassembled it, shot Kirk, then somehow dumped it in the woods reassembled in a box.

Does that sound like anything anybody would actually do if they were committing an assassination? The logical action would be to shoot somebody and either leave the gun or take the gun somewhere it's not going to be easily findable by dogs. But here's the thing: the dogs couldn't even find this rifle initially.

A trained detection dog could find a 9mm bullet in the middle of a 20-acre field, but authorities are claiming they couldn't immediately find a gun that was just shot? That defies logic.

Investigators eventually discovered a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a dark-colored towel in a grassy area with trees on the edge of the UVU campus, north of Campus Drive Road. The rifle was determined to be a Mauser Model 98 .30-06 caliber bolt-action rifle with a scope mounted on top of it.

Strange Inscriptions on Bullet Casings

Investigators noted inscriptions that had been engraved on casings found with the rifle. The inscriptions on a fired casing read: "Notices, bulges, capital O, what's this question mark?" Inscriptions on the three unfired casings included:

  • "Hey, fascist! Catch!" with up arrow symbol, right arrow, and symbol, and three down arrow symbols
  • "Oh, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, Ciao Ciao"
  • "If you read this, you are gay. LMAO"

These inscriptions seem almost theatrical, designed to fit a particular profile rather than the markings of a serious assassin.

No Visual Evidence of Robinson With a Weapon

The fundamental question becomes: Did Tyler Robinson truly kill Charlie Kirk? Looking at everything available, and acknowledging we may not have all of the information and evidence that the Department of Justice has, maybe they have a video of him carrying the gun. But that seems highly unlikely because this is 2025. If there was a video out there of Robinson carrying a gun onto a school campus, we would have seen it by now.

As of now, when he jumps off the building, there's no gun that anybody can see, that anybody can prove. So did he leave it up there? Why would he do that? The absence of visual evidence is glaring.

Blocked Counterterrorism Investigation

Joe Kent, who served as director of national counterterrorism, has publicly stated that he was blocked in regard to investigating any foreign entities who could have been involved with this assassination. This is perhaps the most damning piece of information.

Kent explained: "We don't know what happened with Charlie Kirk. And by no means am I saying the Israelis did this or any of that, but I'm saying there's a lot of unanswered questions there. And there is enough data to at least say that there's a good chance that President Trump feels like he is under threat."

He continued: "We're not allowed to ask basically was there any linkage between what took place with Asif Merchant who was recruited by the Iranians to come to America to recruit proxies to kill President Trump. The FBI put a confidential human source at him. All this is public now. This is all out there in the open. And he's arrested and then two days later a sniper takes a shot at President Trump."

Kent noted that the confidential human source that the FBI put on Merchant was talking about how they could kill the president potentially with a sniper rifle, but then they arrest him. Two days later, Butler happens, and according to the official narrative, Thomas Crooks is an enigma. Authorities claim they don't know anything about him, can't get into his devices, and if they did get into his devices, maybe there's nothing there. No more questions are allowed to be asked about Thomas Crooks.

Then Charlie Kirk is killed publicly in a horrific way, and investigators aren't really allowed to look into that at all.

Charlie Kirk's Opposition to Iran War

Charlie Kirk was one of President Trump's closest advisers, and he advocated heavily against a war with Iran. He was in the Oval Office in the leadup to what became known as the 12-day war.

Joe Kent recounted: "I wasn't particularly close with Charlie. He was very gracious to me when I was running for Congress, very supportive. So we knew each other. And the last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this earth was in June in the West Wing in the stairway and I said hi to him and he looked me in the eye and he said very loudly—and it's a small, you've been in the West Wing, it's small, it's a tight space—and he said 'Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran' very loudly."

Kent added: "He was single-minded. And he walked off and he went I believe into the Oval."

So when one of President Trump's closest advisers who is vocally advocating for the U.S. not to go to war with Iran and for the country to rethink at least its relationship with the Israelis is suddenly publicly assassinated and investigators aren't allowed to ask any questions about that, it's a data point that needs to be examined.

What "Not Allowed to Ask Questions" Really Means

When asked what he meant by "we're not allowed to ask any questions about that," Joe Kent explained: "We've been told that this individual Robinson is a lone gunman and maybe he is. But the investigation that I was a part of, the National Counterterrorism Center was a part of, we were stopped from continuing to investigate."

He continued: "And the FBI will say that they stopped that because they wanted to turn everything over to the Utah state authorities. Everything's going to trial. It's very sensitive. But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can't really get into. But there was still linkage for us to investigate that we needed to run down. And I'm not making any conclusions."

The fact that a counterterrorism investigation was stopped raises the question: what were they prevented from investigating?

Who Wanted Charlie Kirk Dead?

Everything at this point is lining up to a foreign entity, contractor, or some other actor killing Charlie Kirk and somehow setting up Tyler Robinson as the patsy. The evidence includes the text messages Tyler Robinson shared with his boyfriend, seemingly admitting to it. But who does that? Who texts their boyfriend admitting to planning an assassination?

Charlie Kirk came out firmly against Israel at the end of his life. He was talking about issues with Jewish donors. He was talking about problems with Israel. He was questioning why the response time on October 7th was so horrible in one of the most protected borders in the world. He was not a fan of the war in Iran. And then he was killed.

We are in a spiritual war and an information war. Charlie Kirk wasn't dangerous because he had an army of people ready to commit violence. He was dangerous because he controlled information. He had influence over people. If someone has such a big audience and such a loyal audience and starts questioning something that every single president except for JFK bent the knee to—something you don't do anything to oppose no matter what they do, no matter if they bomb one of our ships—that creates a threat to certain interests.

In this analysis, that is the most logical thing to examine.

The Implausibility of the Lone Gunman Theory

What else can an educated, logical, rational, analytical person conclude? Could this Tyler Robinson, who is dating a furry, really take a 140-yard shot with all the adrenaline in the world pumping through his system and hit a 3 to 4-inch area accounting for wind and elevation?

From a marksmanship perspective, it's not an easy shot even in perfect conditions with no adrenaline pumping. Add in the stress, adrenaline, movement, wind, and the technical difficulty increases exponentially. For someone with no apparent military or advanced shooting training to make that shot under those conditions strains credulity.

The questions continue to mount, and the official narrative continues to crumble under scrutiny.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:00] Man, the the news is out. I don't want

[00:03] to say I told everybody so or the

[00:06] doubters or I don't know who literally

[00:09] whoever, but the bullet used to kill

[00:12] Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle

[00:16] allegedly used by the suspect. So folks,

[00:19] we have to kind of put this in

[00:20] perspective because if you are a defense

[00:22] lawyer, if you are anybody who

[00:24] understands law proving someone guilty,

[00:27] the reality of this is is if there is a

[00:30] rifle that they said you used, but the

[00:33] bullet doesn't match, you didn't [ __ ]

[00:35] do it. Like it it can be as simple as

[00:39] that. So who the [ __ ] is Tyler Robinson?

[00:41] Like who is he? So I'm going to go

[00:43] through just kind of the history on this

[00:45] at this point. all the crap that's came

[00:47] out of the FBI. But this is the first

[00:50] thing. The narrative that was put out

[00:51] for those of you who forget is this

[00:54] surgeon came out supposedly violated

[00:56] HIPPA laws to tell a TPUSA employee that

[00:59] Charlie's neck was like the man of

[01:01] steel. 306 stopped it in its tracks. We

[01:05] have shown through our 3006 test. We're

[01:08] we're about to do another one on the

[01:09] other channel that a 300 6 will pretty

[01:12] much go through anything. a full moose,

[01:14] all the bones involved with it, it's

[01:17] ready to go. But they came out and they

[01:19] said this. Charlie Kirk's body stopped a

[01:21] bullet that would typically just go

[01:23] through everything and it was an

[01:25] absolute miracle. Then this dumbass, my

[01:28] god, this guy, this guy is just

[01:29] insufferable. If you have Christ in your

[01:32] king in your bio, but don't believe that

[01:34] a miracle was performed by there being

[01:36] no exit wound on Charlie Kirk, change

[01:39] your bio. How about you just shut the

[01:41] [ __ ] up, man, and maybe understand

[01:43] ballistics a little bit better. Go buy a

[01:45] 300 6 and shoot it. See how much crap

[01:48] you can get it to go through because

[01:50] I've done the test. I know it from

[01:51] simply hunting, but I've done the test.

[01:53] And all the people out there who were

[01:55] like, "Oh, it's possible, dude. It hit

[01:57] his [ __ ] neck. There's nothing in

[01:59] there." Charlie Kirk's body absorbed the

[02:02] entire force of the bullet and in turn

[02:05] saved everyone behind the tent from

[02:07] being shot. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Shut up.

[02:09] Shut up. I would ask if if God was

[02:12] performing a miracle in this situation,

[02:14] wouldn't he have just like I don't know

[02:16] made his skin stop it? Like it hit him

[02:19] and just fell off. I wouldn't call him

[02:22] dying a miracle. So, here it is. A

[02:24] four-page ATF report on a comparison

[02:27] between a bullet jacket fragment

[02:30] recovered during an autopsy of Charlie

[02:32] Kirk and a rifle recovered by law

[02:34] enforcement. The result of the

[02:36] comparison was inconclusive.

[02:39] Okay, so a bullet jacket fragment. They

[02:43] have the technology now to pretty much

[02:46] be able to match whatever it is with any

[02:48] kind of gun and they weren't able to or

[02:50] it was inconclusive. So then we kind of

[02:52] have to put two and two together, right?

[02:53] So there is no real imagery or video out

[02:58] there of Tyler Robinson with a gun. The

[03:01] story is that Tyler Robinson got on the

[03:03] roof undetected with this gun, put it on

[03:06] the roof, disassembled it, reassembled

[03:09] it, and then dumped it in the woods,

[03:11] reassembled in a [ __ ] box. Does that

[03:13] sound like anything anybody would do if

[03:16] they were going to do something like

[03:17] this? No. It's shoot somebody, leave the

[03:19] gun, or take the gun that's not going to

[03:22] be easily findable by dogs. But guess

[03:24] what? The dogs couldn't even find this

[03:26] rifle. If you take my lab, I could put a

[03:28] damn 9 mm bullet in the middle of a 20

[03:31] acre field and he would find it. But

[03:33] you're telling me they couldn't find a

[03:34] gun that was just shot? This is what

[03:36] they said right afteration as well as to

[03:40] uh the the writing on those casings,

[03:44] those those uh those bullet casings. And

[03:48] uh I believe we have that as well. And I

[03:51] will I will share that with you now.

[03:53] So, the area north of Campus Drive Road

[03:56] where the suspect crossed over. You saw

[03:58] some of that in the video that we

[03:59] released last night consists of a grassy

[04:02] area with trees on the edge of the UVU

[04:04] campus. Investigators discovered a

[04:06] bolt-action rifle wrapped in a dark

[04:09] colored towel. The rifle was determined

[04:11] to be a Mouser model 9830 6 caliber 306

[04:15] caliber bolt-action rifle. The rifle had

[04:18] a scope mounted on top of it.

[04:20] Investigators noted inscriptions that

[04:22] had been engraved on casings found with

[04:25] the rifle. Inscriptions on a fired

[04:28] casing read, "Notices, bulges, capital

[04:32] O, what's this question mark?"

[04:35] Inscriptions on the three unfired

[04:37] casings read, "Hey, fascist exclamation

[04:40] point. Catch exclamation point." Up

[04:43] arrow symbol, right arrow, and uh

[04:46] symbol, and three down arrow symbols. A

[04:49] second unfired casing read, "Oh, Bella

[04:52] Chow, Bella Chow, Bella Chow, Chow

[04:54] Chow." And a third unfired casing read,

[04:58] "If you read this, you are gay." L M Ao.

[05:02] All right, you guys. If there was a

[05:04] major disruption, like, I don't know,

[05:06] one of these fights in a grocery store,

[05:08] and you couldn't get food, how long do

[05:10] you think you would last right now with

[05:12] what's currently in your house? Let's go

[05:13] bigger. Let's say there was a nuke that

[05:17] hit us. Let's say we were bombed. Let's

[05:18] say there was a sleeper cell that went

[05:20] off in your area because of the war

[05:23] going on right now. How long would you

[05:25] last in your house with what you

[05:26] currently have? Realistically, if it's

[05:28] anything less than a month, you need to

[05:30] check out our friends at my patriot

[05:32] supply. And right now, when you go to

[05:34] preparewithhdc.com,

[05:37] their best-selling 4-week food supply

[05:39] comes with an additional week of food

[05:42] free. Now, you can see that I've popped

[05:44] this open just to try some of it. It's

[05:46] great stuff, especially in a emergency

[05:49] situation. You can't have enough. So, go

[05:51] with preparewithhdc.com.

[05:53] When you get the four-week supply,

[05:55] you're getting a week free in an ammo

[05:57] can. So, folks, the question becomes,

[06:00] did Tyler Robinson truly kill Charlie

[06:03] Kirk? Like, if you look at everything,

[06:05] and we may not have all of the info and

[06:07] everything that the Department of

[06:09] Justice has in terms of evidence, maybe

[06:11] they have a video of him carrying the

[06:13] gun. I find it very hard to believe

[06:15] because this is 2026. If there was a

[06:18] video out there of him carrying a gun

[06:20] onto a school campus, we would have seen

[06:22] it. So, as of now, when he jumps off the

[06:25] building, there's no gun that anybody

[06:28] can see, that anybody can prove. So, did

[06:30] he leave it up there? Why is Joe Kent,

[06:33] who is the director of national

[06:35] counterterrorism, saying that he was

[06:37] blocked in regard to investigating any

[06:40] foreign entities who could have been

[06:42] involved with this? Everything at this

[06:45] point is lining up to a foreign entity,

[06:48] contractor, whatever it is, killing

[06:51] Charlie Kirk and them somehow setting up

[06:53] Tyler Robinson. Everything from the text

[06:56] messages Tyler Robinson shared with his

[06:59] furry boyfriend pretty much admitting to

[07:01] it. I don't know who does that.

[07:02] >> Um, we don't know what happened with

[07:04] with Charlie Kirk. Uh, and by no means

[07:06] am I saying like, you know, the Israelis

[07:08] did this or or any of that, but I'm

[07:09] saying there's a lot of unanswered

[07:11] questions there. And and there is enough

[07:13] data to at least say that there's a good

[07:15] chance that President Trump feels like

[07:17] he is under threat. Um we're not allowed

[07:20] to ask basically was there any linkage

[07:22] between uh what took place with Asav

[07:25] Merchant who was recruited by the

[07:27] Iranians to come to America to recruit

[07:29] proxies to kill President Trump. The FBI

[07:31] put a put a confidential human source at

[07:33] him. Uh all this is public now. This is

[07:35] all out there in the open. Um and he's

[07:38] arrested and then two days later a

[07:40] sniper takes a shot at President Trump.

[07:42] Um, we think Mant and and the C we know

[07:44] the CHS was talking about the the human

[07:46] source that the FBI put at Mant. They

[07:49] were talking about, hey, we could kill

[07:50] the president potentially with a sniper

[07:52] uh rifle, but then they arrest him. Two

[07:54] days later, Butler happens and and

[07:56] Crooks, according to the official

[07:58] narrative anyways, is an enigma. We

[08:00] don't know anything about him. We can't

[08:01] get into his devices. If we did get into

[08:03] his devices, maybe there's nothing

[08:04] there. No more questions are allowed to

[08:05] be asked about Thomas Krooks. And then,

[08:08] you know, Charlie Kirk is killed

[08:09] publicly in a very horrific way. And

[08:12] we're not really even allowed to look

[08:13] into that at all. And Charlie Kirk was

[08:15] one of President Trump's closest

[08:17] adviserss, and he also advocated heavily

[08:20] against a war with Iran. He was in the

[08:22] Oval Office in the leadup to the 12-day

[08:25] war. I I wasn't particularly close with

[08:27] Charlie. Uh he was very gracious to me

[08:29] when I was running for Congress, very

[08:30] very supportive. So, we knew each other.

[08:32] And the last time I saw Charlie Kirk on

[08:34] this earth was in in June. um in in the

[08:38] in the west wing in the stairway and I

[08:40] said hi to him and he looked me in the

[08:42] eye and he said very loudly and it's a

[08:43] small you've been in the west wing it's

[08:44] it's small uh it's a tight space and and

[08:47] he said Joe stop us from getting into a

[08:49] war with Iran very loudly

[08:50] >> he was single-minded

[08:51] >> and he walked off and he went I believe

[08:53] into the oval um so when one of

[08:55] President Trump's closest advisers who

[08:57] is vocally advocating for us to not go

[09:00] to war with Iran and for us to rethink

[09:03] at least our relationship with the

[09:04] Israelis Um and then he's suddenly

[09:07] publicly assassinated and we're not

[09:09] allowed to ask any questions about that.

[09:11] It's a data point. It's a data point

[09:13] that we need to look into.

[09:14] >> What do you mean um when you say we're

[09:16] not allowed to ask any questions about

[09:17] that?

[09:18] >> We we've we've been told that this

[09:20] individual uh Robinson is a lone gunman

[09:23] and maybe he is. Um but the

[09:25] investigation that that I was a part of,

[09:26] the National Counterterrorism Center was

[09:28] a part of, we were stopped from

[09:29] continuing to investigate. And the FBI

[09:31] will say that that they stopped that

[09:33] because they wanted to have turn every

[09:35] turn everything over to the Utah state

[09:37] authorities. Everything's going to

[09:38] trial. It's very very sensitive. But

[09:39] there was still a lot for us to look

[09:40] into that I I I can't really get into.

[09:42] But there was still linkage for us to

[09:45] investigate that we needed to run down.

[09:47] And I'm not making any conclusions. I'm

[09:49] not saying I don't think you are

[09:50] >> because you know.

[09:51] >> So the question becomes who wanted him

[09:53] dead? Well, I can tell you this.

[09:55] >> Charlie Kirk came out firmly against

[09:57] Israel at the end. He was talking about

[10:00] issues with Jewish donors. He was

[10:02] talking about problems with Israel. He

[10:04] was talking about why the response time

[10:06] on October 7th was so horrible in one of

[10:08] the most protected borders in the world.

[10:11] He was not a fan of the war in Iran. And

[10:13] then he was killed. Remember folks, we

[10:15] are in a spiritual war in an information

[10:18] war. So it is no longer, oh, Charlie

[10:22] Kirk is super dangerous to our country

[10:24] because he has an army of people that

[10:26] can just come and kill us. No, he

[10:29] controls information. He has influence

[10:31] over people. So if he has such a big

[10:33] audience and such a loyal audience and

[10:36] he starts questioning something that

[10:39] every single president except for JFK

[10:43] bent the knee to and got on their knees

[10:45] for which is you don't do anything to

[10:48] piss them off no matter what they do. No

[10:50] matter if they bomb one of our ships. In

[10:53] my opinion that is the most logical

[10:56] thing to look at. What else can an

[10:58] educated, logical, rational, analytical

[11:02] person confirm that this Tyler Robinson

[11:04] guy who is dating some [ __ ] furry

[11:07] could take a 140 yard shot with all the

[11:10] adrenaline going on in the world and hit

[11:12] a 3 to 4 in area, wind, elevation.

[11:16] Folks, I've done it. It is not an easy

[11:19] shot. Just clear as day. No adrenaline

[11:21] pumping. We're about to do another test

[11:23] where we actually get adrenaline pumping

[11:25] and we're going to see how hard it is to

[11:27] do.

[11:59] Heat.

Link copied to clipboard!